Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives: Dynamic Processes of Personality

Part V - Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives: Dynamic Processes of Personality

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020

Edited by

Philip J. Corr and

Gerald Matthews

Show author details

Philip J. Corr: Affiliation:
City, University London
Gerald Matthews: Affiliation:
University of Central Florida

Book contents

Get access

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology , pp. 293 - 374

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108264822 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, P. L. (2003). Aptitude complexes and trait complexes. Educational Psychologist, 38, 85–93.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. (2009). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arce, E., & Santisteban, C. (2006). Impulsivity: A review. Psicothema, 18, 213–220.Google Scholar

Areh, I., & Umek, P. (2007). Predicting quality of memory recall by personality traits. Studia Psychologica, 49, 19–26.Google Scholar

Aue, T., & Okon-Singer, H. (2015). Expectancy biases in fear and anxiety and their link to biases in attention. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 83–95.Google Scholar

Bakker, A. B. (2014). Daily fluctuations in work engagement. European Psychologist, 19, 227–236.Google Scholar

Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.Google Scholar

Barron, L. G., Carretta, T. R., & Bonto-Kane, M. V. A. (2016). Relations of personality traits to military aviator performance: It depends on the criterion. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 6, 57–67.Google Scholar

Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., & Leue, A. (2006). Energetical bases of extraversion: Effort, arousal, EEG, and performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 212–223.Google Scholar

Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Beck, A. T., & Haigh, E. A. (2014). Advances in cognitive theory and therapy: The generic cognitive model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 1–24.Google Scholar

Berggren, N., Blonievsky, T., & Derakshan, N. (2015). Enhanced visual detection in trait anxiety. Emotion, 15, 477–483.Google Scholar

Berggren, N., & Derakshan, N. (2013). Attentional control deficits in trait anxiety: Why you see them and why you don’t. Biological Psychology, 92, 440–446.Google Scholar

Berggren, N., & Derakshan, N. (2014). Inhibitory deficits in trait anxiety: Increased stimulus-based or response-based interference? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1339–1345.Google Scholar

Berggren, N., Koster, E. H., & Derakshan, N. (2012). The effect of cognitive load in emotional attention and trait anxiety: An eye movement study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 79–91.Google Scholar

Beukeboom, C. J., Tanis, M., & Vermeulen, I. E. (2013). The language of extraversion: Extraverted people talk more abstractly, introverts are more concrete. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 191–201.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The modeling and assessment of work performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47–74.Google Scholar

Carrigan, N., & Barkus, E. (2016). A systematic review of cognitive failures in daily life: Healthy populations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 63, 29–42.Google Scholar

Cartwright-Hatton, S., & Wells, A. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 279–296.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679–704.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2005). Engagement, disengagement, coping, and catastrophe. In Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 527–547). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Chapman, A., Devue, C., & Grimshaw, G. M. (2017). Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task. Psychological Research, 1 -13.Google Scholar

Chen, J., Milne, K., Dayman, J., & Kemps, E. (2019). Interpretation bias and social anxiety: Does interpretation bias mediate the relationship between trait social anxiety and state anxiety responses? Cognition and Emotion, 33, 630–645.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Civai, C., Hawes, D. R., DeYoung, C. G., & Rustichini, A. (2016). Intelligence and extraversion in the neural evaluation of delayed rewards. Journal of Research in Personality, 61, 99–108.Google Scholar

Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 203–216.Google Scholar

Corcoran, D. J. W. (1972). Studies of individual differences at the Applied Psychology Unit. In Nebylitsin, V. D. & Gray, J. A. (Eds.), Biological bases of individual behavior (pp. 269–290). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Corr, P. J., & McNaughton, N. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 155–187). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coy, B., O’Brien, W. H., Tabaczynski, T., Northern, J., & Carels, R. (2011). Associations between evaluation anxiety, cognitive interference and performance on working memory tasks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 823–832.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.Google Scholar

Dale, R., Dietrich, E., & Chemero, A. (2009). Explanatory pluralism in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 33, 739–742.Google Scholar

De Cuyper, K., De Houwer, J., Vansteelandt, K., Perugini, M., Pieters, G., Claes, L., & Hermans, D. (2017). Using indirect measurement tasks to assess the self‐concept of personality: A systematic review and meta‐analyses. European Journal of Personality, 31, 8–41.Google Scholar

De Pascalis, V. (2004). On the psychophysiology of extraversion. In Stelmack, R. (Ed.), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honor of Marvin Zuckerman (pp. 295–327). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Dewaele, J. M. (2013). The link between foreign language classroom anxiety and psychoticism, extraversion, and neuroticism among adult bi‐and multilinguals. Modern Language Journal, 97, 670–684.Google Scholar

Dewaele, J., & Furnham, A. (1999). Extraversion: The unloved variable in applied linguistic research. Language Learning, 49, 509–544.Google Scholar

Dewberry, C., Juanchich, M., & Narendran, S. (2013). Decision-making competence in everyday life: The roles of general cognitive styles, decision-making styles and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 783–788.Google Scholar

Dietrich, M., & Abbott, K. V. (2012). Vocal function in introverts and extraverts during a psychological stress reactivity protocol. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 973–987.Google Scholar

Dobbs, S., Furnham, A., & McClelland, A. (2011). The effect of background music and noise on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 307–313.Google Scholar

Doucet, C., & Stelmack, R.M. (2000). An event-related potential analysis of extraversion and individual differences in cognitive processing speed and response execution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 956–964.Google Scholar

Doughty, N., Paterson, H. M., MacCann, C., & Monds, L. A. (2017). Personality and memory conformity. Journal of Individual Differences, 38, 12–20.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ettinger, U., Corr, P. J., Mofidi, A., Williams, S. C., & Kumari, V. (2013). Dopaminergic basis of the psychosis-prone personality investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging of procedural learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7 (Article 30), 1–11.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1957). The dynamics of anxiety and hysteria. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL.: Thomas.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W. (1981). Learning, memory and personality. In Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 169–203). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W., & Derakshan, N. (2011). New perspectives in attentional control theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 955–960.Google Scholar

Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.Google Scholar

Finomore, V. S., Matthews, G., & Warm, J. S. (2009). Predicting vigilance: A fresh look at an old problem. Ergonomics, 52, 791–808.Google Scholar

Fournier, K. A., Couret, J., Ramsay, J. B., & Caulkins, J. L. (2017). Using collaborative two‐stage examinations to address test anxiety in a large enrollment gateway course. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10, 409–422.Google Scholar

Fuentes-Claramonte, P., Ávila, C., Rodríguez-Pujadas, A., Costumero, V., Ventura-Campos, N., Bustamante, J. C., … Barrós-Loscertales, A. (2016). Inferior frontal cortex activity is modulated by reward sensitivity and performance variability. Biological Psychology, 114, 127–137.Google Scholar

Furnham, A., Boo, H. C., & McClelland, A. (2012). Individual differences and the susceptibility to the influence of anchoring cues. Journal of Individual Differences, 33, 89–93.Google Scholar

Furnham, A., & Strbac, L. (2002). Music is as distracting as noise: The differential distraction of background music and noise on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Ergonomics, 45, 203–217.Google Scholar

Gore, W. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 816–821.Google Scholar

Grafton, B., & MacLeod, C. (2014). Enhanced probing of attentional bias: The independence of anxiety-linked selectivity in attentional engagement with and disengagement from negative information. Cognition and Emotion, 28, 1287–1302.Google Scholar

Graham, E. K., Rutsohn, J. P., Turiano, N. A., Bendayan, R., Batterham, P. J., Gerstorf, D., … Bastarache, E. D. (2017). Personality predicts mortality risk: An integrative data analysis of 15 international longitudinal studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 174–186.Google Scholar

Gray, J. R., Burgess, G. C., Schaefer, A., Yarkoni, T., Larsen, R. J., & Braver, T. S. (2005). Affective personality differences in neural processing efficiency confirmed using fMRI. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 182–190.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gurtman, M. B. (2009). Exploring personality with the interpersonal circumplex. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 601–619.Google Scholar

Gustavson, D. E., & Miyake, A. (2016). Trait worry is associated with difficulties in working memory updating. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 1289–1303.Google Scholar

Haran, U., Ritov, I., & Mellers, B. A. (2013). The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 188–201.Google Scholar

Hennessy, D. A. (2011). Social, personality, and affective constructs in driving. In Porter, B. E. (Ed.), Handbook of traffic psychology (pp. 149 – 163). London: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Hockey, G. R. J. (1984). Varieties of attentional state: The effects of environment. In Parasuraman, R. & Davies, D. R. (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 449–483). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hooper, C. J., Luciana, M., Wahlstrom, D., Conklin, H. M., & Yarger, R. S. (2008). Personality correlates of Iowa Gambling Task performance in healthy adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 598–609.Google Scholar

Humphreys, M. S., & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychological Review, 91, 153–184.Google Scholar

Ilkowska, M., & Engle, R. W. (2010). Trait and state differences in working memory capacity. In Gruszka, A., Matthews, G. & Szymura, B. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control (pp. 295–320). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Joseph, D. L., Jin, J., Newman, D. A., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2015). Why does self-reported emotional intelligence predict job performance? A meta-analytic investigation of mixed EI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 298–342.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person–situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1149–1179.Google Scholar

Kennis, M., Rademaker, A. R., & Geuze, E. (2013). Neural correlates of personality: An integrative review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 73–95.Google Scholar

Koch, J., & Exner, C. (2015). Selective attention deficits in obsessive–compulsive disorder: The role of metacognitive processes. Psychiatry Research, 225, 550–555.Google Scholar

Koelega, H. S. (1992). Extraversion and vigilance performance: 30 years of inconsistencies. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 239–258.Google Scholar

Lauriola, M., & Levin, I. P. (2001). Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 215–226.Google Scholar

Leleu, V., Douilliez, C., & Rusinek, S. (2014). Difficulty in disengaging attention from threatening facial expressions in anxiety: A new approach in terms of benefits. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45, 203–207.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lieberman, M. D. (2000). Introversion and working memory: Central executive differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 479–486.Google Scholar

Lubow, R. E., & Kaplan, O. (2010). Psychopathology and individual differences in latent inhibition: Schizophrenia and schizotypality. In Gruszka, A., Matthews, G. & Szymura, B. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory and executive control (pp. 181–193). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

MacLeod, C., & Clarke, P. J. (2015). The attentional bias modification approach to anxiety intervention. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 58–78.Google Scholar

Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (1998). A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 539–560.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (1992). Extraversion. In Smith, A. P. & Jones, D. M. (Eds.), Handbook of human performance: State and trait (Vol. 3, pp. 95–126). London: Academic.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (1997). Extraversion, emotion and performance: A cognitive-adaptive model. In Matthews, G. (Ed.), Cognitive science perspectives on personality and emotion (pp. 339–442). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (1999). Personality and skill: A cognitive-adaptive framework. In Ackerman, P. L., Kyllonen, P. C. & Roberts, R. D. (Eds.), The future of learning and individual differences research: Processes, traits, and content (pp. 251–270). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (2000). A cognitive science critique of biological theories of personality traits. History and Philosophy of Psychology, 2, 1–17.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (2002). Towards a transactional ergonomics for driver stress and fatigue. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 195–211.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (2004). Neuroticism from the top down: Psychophysiology and negative emotionality. In Stelmack, R. (Ed.), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honor of Marvin Zuckerman (pp. 249–266). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (2008a). Personality and information processing: A cognitive-adaptive theory. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and testing: Personality theories and models (Vol. 1, pp. 56–79). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (2008b). Reinforcement sensitivity theory: A critique from cognitive science. In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 482–507). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (2016). Traits, cognitive processes and adaptation: An elegy for Hans Eysenck’s personality theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 61–67.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (2018). Cognitive‐adaptive trait theory: A shift in perspective on personality. Journal of Personality, 86, 69–82.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., & Amelang, M. (1993). Extraversion, arousal theory and performance: A study of individual differences in the EEG. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 347–364.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Davies, D. R., & Lees, J. L. (1990). Arousal, extraversion, and individual differences in resource availability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 150–168.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Davies, D. R., Westerman, S. J., & Stammers, R. B. (2000). Human performance: Cognition, stress and individual differences. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Personality traits (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., & Gilliland, K. (1999). The personality theories of H. J. Eysenck and J. A. Gray: A comparative review. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 583–626.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., & Harley, T. A. (1993). Effects of extraversion and self-report arousal on semantic priming: A connectionist approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 735–756.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., & Harley, T. A. (1996). Connectionist models of emotional distress and attentional bias. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 561–600.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Lin, J., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2017). Emotional intelligence and giftedness. In Pfeiffer, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Panganiban, A. R., & Hudlicka, E. (2011). Anxiety and selective attention to threat in tactical decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 949–954.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Panganiban, A. R., Wells, A., Wohleber, R. W., & Reinerman-Jones, L. E. (2019). Metacognition, hardiness and grit as resilience factors in Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) operations: A simulation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 640.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Pérez-González, J.-C., Fellner, A. N., Funke, G. J., Emo, A. K., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2015). Individual differences in facial emotion processing: Trait emotional intelligence, cognitive ability or transient stress? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 68–82.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., & Reinerman-Jones, L. (2017). Workload assessment: How to diagnose workload issues and enhance performance. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Reinerman-Jones, L. E., Burke, C. S., Teo, G. W., & Scribner, D. R. (2018). Nationalism, personality, and decision-making: Evidence from an SJT for military multi-national teaming scenarios. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 89–100.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Warm, J. S., Shaw, T. H., & Finomore, V. S. (2014). Predicting battlefield vigilance: A multivariate approach to assessment of attentional resources. Ergonomics, 57, 856–875.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Wohleber, R., & Lin, J. (2020). Stress, skilled performance, and expertise: Overload and beyond. In Ward, P., Schraagen, J. M., Gore, J. & Roth, E. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of expertise. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., & Zeidner, M. (2004). Traits, states and the trilogy of mind: An adaptive perspective on intellectual functioning. In Dai, D. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 143–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., & Zeidner, M. (2012). Individual differences in attentional networks: Trait and state correlates of the ANT. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 574–579.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. (2002). Emotional intelligence: Science and myth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2006). Models of personality and affect for education: A review and synthesis. In Winne, P. & Alexander, P. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 163–186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

McIntyre, M. M., & Graziano, W. G. (2016). Seeing people, seeing things: Individual differences in selective attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1258–1271.Google Scholar

McKenna, F. P., & Sharma, D. (2004). Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast and slow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 382–392.Google Scholar

McNally, R. J. (2019). Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity? Clinical Psychology Review, 69, 4–13.Google Scholar

Mehl, M. R., Gosling, S. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2006). Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 862–877.Google Scholar

Moore, A. M., McAuley, A. J., Allred, G. A., & Ashcraft, M. H. (2015). In Chinn, S. (Ed.), Mathematics anxiety, working memory, and mathematical performance. The Routledge international handbook of dyscalculia and mathematical learning difficulties (pp. 326–336). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Moran, T. P. (2016). Anxiety and working memory capacity: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 831–864.Google Scholar

Munoz, E., Sliwinski, M. J., Smyth, J. M., Almeida, D. M., & King, H. A. (2013). Intrusive thoughts mediate the association between neuroticism and cognitive function. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 898–903.Google Scholar

Naveh‐Benjamin, M., Lavi, H., McKeachie, W. J., & Lin, Y. G. (1997). Individual differences in students’ retention of knowledge and conceptual structures learned in university and high school courses: The case of test anxiety. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 507–526.Google Scholar

Newell, A. (1982). The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence, 18, 87–127.Google Scholar

Onie, S., & Most, S. B. (2017). Two roads diverged: Distinct mechanisms of attentional bias differentially predict negative affect and persistent negative thought. Emotion, 17, 884–894.Google Scholar

Ormel, J., Jeronimus, B. F., Kotov, R., Riese, H., Bos, E. H., Hankin, B., … Oldehinkel, A. J. (2013). Neuroticism and common mental disorders: Meaning and utility of a complex relationship. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 686–697.Google Scholar

Phaf, R. H., & Kan, K. (2007). The automaticity of emotional Stroop: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 184–199.Google Scholar

Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. G., & Dunbar, R. I. (2011). Extraverts have larger social network layers: But do not feel emotionally closer to individuals at any layer. Journal of Individual Differences, 32, 161–169.Google Scholar

Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the Five-Factor Model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). What’s in your mind? In Lepore, E. & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (Eds.), What is cognitive science? (pp. 1–25). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rammsayer, T. H., Indermühle, R., & Troche, S. J. (2014). Psychological refractory period in introverts and extraverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 10–15.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, A. S., & Berntsen, D. (2010). Personality traits and autobiographical memory: Openness is positively related to the experience and usage of recollections. Memory, 18, 774–786.Google Scholar

Roberts, R. D., Martin, J., & Olaru, G. (2015). A Rosetta Stone for noncognitive skills: Understanding, assessing, and enhancing noncognitive skills in primary and secondary education. New York: Asia Society and ProExam.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., Lievens, F., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Kuncel, N. R. (2017). Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 254–273.Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F., & Tauriz, G. (2014). The Five-Factor Model, forced-choice personality inventories and performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis of academic and occupational validity studies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 3–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sanford, L. C., & Fisk, J. E. (2009). How does the extraversion personality trait influence false recall with the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm? Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 972–977.Google Scholar

Sarason, I. G. (1972). Experimental approaches to test anxiety: Attention and the uses of information. In Spielberger, C. D. (Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 383–403). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., & Pierce, G. R. (1995) Cognitive interference: At the intelligence-personality crossroads. In Saklofske, D. H. & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 285–296). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2005). A latent state-trait analysis of implicit and explicit personality measures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 100–107.Google Scholar

Servaas, M. N., van der Velde, J., Costafreda, S. G., Horton, P., Ormel, J., Riese, H., & Aleman, A. (2013). Neuroticism and the brain: A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies investigating emotion processing. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 1518–1529.Google Scholar

Spielberger, C. D. (1966) The effects of anxiety on complex learning and academic achievement. In Spielberger, C. D. (Ed.), Anxiety and behavior (pp. 3–20). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Spielberger, C. D. (1972). Anxiety as an emotional state. In Spielberger, C. D. (Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 23–49). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Staugaard, S. R. (2010). Threatening faces and social anxiety: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 669–690.Google Scholar

Stelmack, R. M., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2008). Psychophysiological and biochemical perspectives on personality. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and testing: Personality theories and models (Vol. 1, pp. 33–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Stoeber, J., Chesterman, D., & Tarn, T. A. (2010). Perfectionism and task performance: Time on task mediates the perfectionistic strivings–performance relationship. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 458–462.Google Scholar

Stoeber, J., Haskew, A. E., & Scott, C. (2015). Perfectionism and exam performance: The mediating effect of task-approach goals. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 171–176.Google Scholar

Szalma, J. L., & Taylor, G. S. (2011). Individual differences in response to automation: The five factor model of personality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 71–96.Google Scholar

Szymura, B., & Necka, E. (1998). Visual selective attention and personality: An experimental verification of three models of extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 713–729.Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.Google Scholar

van Rooijen, R., Ploeger, A., & Kret, M. E. (2017). The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1686–1717.Google Scholar

Vogel, S., & Schwabe, L. (2016). Stress in the zoo: Tracking the impact of stress on memory formation over time. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 71, 64–72.Google Scholar

Wacker, J., Chavanon, M. L., & Stemmler, G. (2006). Investigating the dopaminergic basis of extraversion in humans: A multilevel approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 171–187.Google Scholar

Wacker, J., & Smillie, L. D. (2015). Trait extraversion and dopamine function. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 225–238.Google Scholar

Wang, X., Pan, Y., Zhang, K., Sui, Y., Lv, T., Xu, S., & Gao, L. (2017). Emotional experience and personality traits influence individual and joint risk-based decision making. Social Behavior and Personality, 45, 881–892.Google Scholar

Waris, O., Soveri, A., Lukasik, K. M., Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M. (2018). Working memory and the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 130, 26–35.Google Scholar

Warm, J. S., Parasuraman, R., & Matthews, G. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50, 433–441.Google Scholar

Watson, D. (2000) Mood and temperament. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Weinman, J. (1987) Non-cognitive determinants of perceptual problem-solving strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 53–58.Google Scholar

Wells, A. (2013). Advances in metacognitive therapy. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 6, 186–201.Google Scholar

Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (2015) Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

White, L. K., Britton, J. C., Sequeira, S., Ronkin, E. G., Chen, G., Bar-Haim, Y., … Pine, D. S. (2016). Behavioral and neural stability of attention bias to threat in healthy adolescents. Neuroimage, 136, 84–93.Google Scholar

Wright, B. A., Peters, E. R., Ettinger, U., Kuipers, E., & Kumari, V. (2016). Moderators of noise-induced cognitive change in healthy adults. Noise & Health, 18, 117–132.Google Scholar

Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2005). Evaluation anxiety. In Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 141–163). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Ziemkiewicz, C., Ottley, A., Crouser, R. J., Yauilla, A. R., Su, S. L., Ribarsky, W., & Chang, R. (2013). How visualization layout relates to locus of control and other personality factors. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19, 1109–1121.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, M. (2005). Psychobiology of personality (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Ahadi, S. A., & Rothbart, M. K. (1994). Temperament, development and the Big Five. In Halverson, C. F. Jr., Kohnstamm, G. A. & Martin, R. P. (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 189–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ballard, T., Yeo, G., Vancouver, J. B., & Neal, A. (2017). The dynamics of avoidance goal regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 698–707.Google Scholar

Barratt, E. S. (1965). Factor analysis of some psychometric measures of impulsiveness and anxiety. Psychological Reports, 16, 547–554.Google Scholar

Beer, R. D. (1995). A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence, 72, 173–215.Google Scholar

Berg, J. M., Latzman, R. D., Bliwise, N. G., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2015). Parsing the heterogeneity of impulsivity: A meta-analytic review of the behavioral implications of the UPPS for psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1129–1146.Google Scholar

Berridge, K. C. (2004). Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. Physiology & Behavior, 81, 179–209.Google Scholar

Block, J. (2002). Personality as an affect-processing system: Toward an integrative theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In Collins, W. A. (Ed.), Development of cognition, affect, and social relations (Minnesota symposia on child psychology, Vol. 13, pp. 39–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bocanegra, B. R., & Hommel, B. (2014). When cognitive control is not adaptive. Psychological Science, 25, 1249–1255.Google Scholar

Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 106–113.Google Scholar

Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 109–131.Google Scholar

Buckholz, J. W. (2015). Social norms, self-control, and the value of antisocial behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 122–129.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S. (2001). Affect and the functional bases of behavior: On the dimensional structure of affective experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 345–356.CrossRef Google Scholar

Carver, C. S. (2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 241–261.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4, 3–22.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., Johnson, S. L., & Joormann, J. (2008). Serotonergic function, two-mode models of self-regulation, and vulnerability to depression: What depression has in common with impulsive aggression. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 912–943.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., Johnson, S. L., & Joormann, J. (2013). Major depressive disorder and impulsive reactivity to emotion: Toward a dual process view of depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52, 285–299.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., Johnson, S. L., Joormann, J., Kim, Y., & Nam, J. Y. (2011). Serotonin transporter polymorphism interacts with childhood adversity to predict aspects of impulsivity. Psychological Science, 22, 589–595.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., Johnson, S. L., & Timpano, K. R. (2017). Toward a functional view of the p factor in psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 5, 880–889.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., Lawrence, J. W., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Self-discrepancies and affect: Incorporating the role of feared selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 783–792.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19–35.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Scaling back goals and recalibration of the affect system are processes in normal adaptive self-regulation: Understanding “response shift” phenomena. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 1715–1722.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Control processes and self-organization as complementary principles underlying behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 304–315.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2003). Three human strengths. In Aspinwall, L. G. & Staudinger, U. M. (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 87–102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2017a). Perspectives on personality (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2017b). Self-regulatory functions supporting motivated action. In Elliot, A. J. (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 4, pp. 1–37). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Goldman-Mellor, S. J., Harrington, H., Israel, S., … Moffitt, T. (2014). The P-factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 119–137.Google Scholar

Castellanos-Ryan, N., Brière, F. N., O’Leary-Barrett, M., Banaschewski, T., Bokde, A., Bromberg, U., … IMAGEN CONSORTIUM (2016). The structure of psychopathology in adolescence and its common personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 1039–1052.Google Scholar

Clark, L. A. (2005). Temperament as a unifying basis for personality and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 505–521.Google Scholar

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1999). Temperament: A new paradigm for trait psychology. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 399–423). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Clark, R. N. (1996). Control system dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cleare, A. J., & Bond, A. J. (1997). Does central serotonergic function correlate inversely with aggression? A study using D-fenfluramine in healthy subjects. Psychiatry Research, 69, 89–95.Google Scholar

Clore, G. C. (1994). Why emotions are felt. In Ekman, P. & Davidson, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 103–111). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Coccaro, E. F., Kavoussi, R. J., Cooper, T. B., & Hauger, R. L. (1997). Central serotonin activity and aggression: Inverse relationship with prolactin response to d-fenfluramine, but not CSF 5-HIAA concentration, in human subjects. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1430–1435.Google Scholar

Coccaro, E. F., Kavoussi, R. J., Hauger, R. L., Cooper, T. B., & Ferris, C. F. (1998). Cerebrospinal fluid vasopressin levels: Correlates with aggression and serotonin function in personality-disordered subjects. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 708–714.Google Scholar

Cooper, M. L, Wood, P. K., Orcutt, H. K., & Albino, A. (2003). Personality and the predisposition to engage in risky or problem behaviors during adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 390–410.Google Scholar

Cyders, M. A., Smith, G. T., Spillane, N. S., Fischer, S., Annus, A. M., & Peterson, C. (2007). Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: Development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychological Assessment, 19, 107–118.Google Scholar

Daly, M., Delaney, L., Egan, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2015). Childhood self-control and unemployment throughout the life span: Evidence from two British cohort studies. Psychological Science, 26, 709–723.Google Scholar

Davidson, R. J. (1992). Anterior cerebral asymmetry and the nature of emotion. Brain and Cognition, 20, 125–151.Google Scholar

Daw, N. D., Niv, Y., & Dayan, P. (2005). Uncertainty-based competition between prefrontal and dorsolateral striatal systems for behavioral control. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1704–1711.Google Scholar

Dayan, P. (2008). Simple substrates for complex cognition. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2, 255–263.Google Scholar

Del Giudice, M. (2014). An evolutionary life history framework for psychopathology. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 261–300.Google Scholar

Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–517.Google Scholar

Dickman, S. J. (1990). Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: Personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 95–102.Google Scholar

Diener, E. (1979). Deindividuation, self-awareness, and disinhibition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1160–1171.Google Scholar

Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 343–353.Google Scholar

Durston, S., Thomas, K. M., Worden, M. S., Yang, Y., & Casey, B. J. (2002). The effect of preceding context on inhibition: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 16, 449–453.Google Scholar

Durston, S., Thomas, K. M., Yang, Y., Ulug, A. M., Zimmerman, R. D., & Casey, B. J. (2002). A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control. Developmental Science, 5, F9–F16.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, N. (2002). Emotion-related regulation and its relation to quality of social functioning. In Hartup, W. W. & Weinberg, R. A. (Eds.), Child psychology in retrospect and prospect: The Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 133–171). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, N., Hofer, C., Sulik, M., & Spinrad, T. L. (2014). Self-regulation, effortful control, and their socioemotional correlates. In Gross, J. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed., pp. 157–172). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.Google Scholar

Finlay-Jones, R., & Brown, G. W. (1981). Types of stressful life event and the onset of anxiety and depressive disorders. Psychological Medicine, 11, 803–815.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1962). The ego and the id. New York: Norton. (Originally published, 1923.)Google Scholar

Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349–358.Google Scholar

Frijda, N. H. (1994). Emotions are functional, most of the time. In Ekman, P. & Davidson, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 112–126). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fulford, D., Johnson, S. L., Llabre, M. M., & Carver, C. S. (2010). Pushing and coasting in dynamic goal pursuit: Coasting is attenuated in bipolar disorder. Psychological Science, 21, 1021–1027.Google Scholar

Gendolla, G. H. E., & Richter, M. (2010). Effort mobilization when the self is involved: Some lessons from the cardiovascular system. Review of General Psychology, 14, 212–226.Google Scholar

George, D. T., Umhau, J. C., Phillips, M. J., Emmela, D., Ragan, P. W., Shoaf, S. E., … Rawlings, R. R. (2001). Serotonin, testosterone, and alcohol in the etiology of domestic violence. Psychiatry Research, 104, 27–37.Google Scholar

Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gray, J. A. (1994). Personality dimensions and emotion systems. In Ekman, P. & Davidson, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 329–331). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gross, J. J. (Ed.) (2007). Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hansen, E. B., & Breivik, G. (2001). Sensation seeking as a predictor of positive and negative risk behaviour among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 627–640.Google Scholar

Harvey, A., Watkins, E., Mansell, W., & Shafran, R. (2004). Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders: A transdiagnostic approach to research and treatment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hayes-Roth, B., & Hayes-Roth, F. (1979). A cognitive model of planning. Cognitive Science, 3, 275–310.Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T. (1996). Ideals, oughts, and regulatory focus: Affect and motivation from distinct pains and pleasures. In Gollwitzer, P. M. & Bargh, J. A. (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 91–114). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T., & Brendl, C. M. (1995). Accessibility and applicability: Some “activation rules” influencing judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 218–243.Google Scholar

Hull, J. G. (1981). A self-awareness model of the causes and effects of alcohol consumption. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 586–600.Google Scholar

Johnson, S. L., Carver, C. S., & Joormann, J. (2013). Impulsive responses to emotion as a transdiagnostic vulnerability to internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 150, 872–878.Google Scholar

Johnson, S. L., Carver, C. S., Mulé, S., & Joormann, J. (2013). Impulsivity and risk for mania: Toward greater specificity. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 86, 401–412.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N., Mancini, F., & Gangemi, A. (2006). A hyper-emotion theory of psychological illnesses. Psychological Review, 113, 822–841.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar

Kaiser, A., Bonsu, J. A., Charnigo, R. J., Milich, R. A., & Lynam, D. R. (2016). Impulsive personality and alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 77, 475–482.Google Scholar

Keren, G., & Schul, Y. (2009). Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 533–550.Google Scholar

Kieras, J. E., Tobin, R. M., Graziano, W. G., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Effortful control and children’s responses to undesirable gifts. Psychological Science, 16, 391–396.Google Scholar

Klinger, E. (1975). Consequences of commitment to and disengagement from incentives. Psychological Review, 82, 1–25.Google Scholar

Kochanska, G., & Knaack, A. (2003). Effortful control as a personality characteristic of young children: Antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Personality, 71, 1087–1112.Google Scholar

Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2006). Reinterpreting comorbidity: A model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 111–133.Google Scholar

Laceulle, O. M., Vollebergh, W. A. M., & Ormel, J. (2015). The structure of psychopathology in adolescence: Replication of a general psychopathology factor in the TRAILS Study. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 850–860.Google Scholar

Lahey, B. B., Applegate, B., Hakes, J. K., Zald, D. H., Hariri, A. R., & Rathouz, P. J. (2012). Is there a general factor of prevalent psychopathology during adulthood? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 971–977.Google Scholar

Lahey, B. B., Rathouz, P. J., Keenan, K., Stepp, S. D., Loeber, R., & Hipwell, A. E. (2015). Criterion validity of the general factor of psychopathology in a prospective study of girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 56, 415–422.Google Scholar

Louro, M. J., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2007). Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 174–193.Google Scholar

Lynam, D. R. (1996). Early identification of chronic offenders: Who is the fledgling psychopath? Psychological Bulletin, 120, 209–234.Google Scholar

MacDonald, K. B. (2008). Effortful control, explicit processing, and the regulation of human evolved dispositions. Psychological Review, 115, 1012–1031.Google Scholar

MacKay, D. M. (1966). Cerebral organization and the conscious control of action. In Eccles, J. C. (Ed.), Brain and conscious experience (pp. 422–445). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Manuck, S. B., Kaplan, J. R., & Lotrich, F. E. (2006). Brain serotonin and aggressive disposition in humans and nonhuman primates. In Nelson, R. J. (Ed.), Biology of aggression (pp. 65–102). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mikulincer, M. (1994). Human learned helplessness: A coping perspective. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Mizruchi, M. S. (1991). Urgency, motivation, and group performance: The effect of prior success on current success among professional basketball teams. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 181–189.Google Scholar

Nesse, R. M. (2000). Is depression an adaptation? Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 14–20.Google Scholar

Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental pychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 220–246.Google Scholar

Nigg, J. T. (2003). Response inhibition and disruptive behaviors: Toward a multiprocess conception of etiological heterogeneity for ADHD combined type and conduct disorder early-onset type. Annuals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1008, 170–182.Google Scholar

Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1–15.Google Scholar

Ogilvie, D. M. (1987). The undesired self: A neglected variable in personality research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 379–385.Google Scholar

Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Otto, A. R., Gershman, S. J., Markman, A. B., & Daw, N. D. (2013). The curse of planning: Dissecting multiple reinforcement learning systems by taxing the central executive. Psychological Science, 24, 751–761.Google Scholar

Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 54–74.Google Scholar

Parker, J. D. A., Bagby, R. M., & Webster, C. D. (1993). Domains of the impulsivity construct: A factor analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 267–274.Google Scholar

Payton, D. W. (1990). Internalized plans: A representation for action resources. In Maes, P. (Ed.), Designing autonomous agents: Theory and practice from biology to engineering and back (pp. 89–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Pearson, C. M., Combs, J. L., Zapolski, T. C., & Smith, G. T. (2012). A longitudinal transactional risk model for early eating disorder onset. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 27, 320–331.Google Scholar

Pittman, T. S., & Pittman, N. L. (1980). Deprivation of control and the attribution process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 377–389.Google Scholar

Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar

Rick, S. I., Cryder, C. E., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Tightwads and spendthrifts. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 767–782.Google Scholar

Riley, E. N., Combs, J. L., Jordan, C. E., & Smith, G. T. (2015). Negative urgency and lack of perseverance: Identification of differential pathways of onset and maintenance risk in the longitudinal prediction of nonsuicidal self-injury. Behavior Therapy, 46, 439–448.Google Scholar

Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., Hershey, K., & Fisher, P. (2001). Investigations of temperament at three to seven years: The Children’s Behavior Questionnaire. Child Development, 72, 1394–1408.Google Scholar

Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Temperament. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) and Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional and personality development (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 105–176). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Rothbart, M. K., Ellis, L. K., Rueda, M. R., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Developing mechanisms of temperamental effortful control. Journal of Personality, 71, 1113–1143.Google Scholar

Rudman, L. A., Phelan, J. E., & Heppen, J. B. (2007). Developmental sources of implicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1700–1713.Google Scholar

Sansone, C., Wiebe, D. J., & Morgan, C. (1999). Self-regulating interest: The moderating role of hardiness and conscientiousness. Journal of Personality, 67, 701–733.Google Scholar

Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.Google Scholar

Shallice, T. (1978). The dominant action system: An information-processing approach to consciousness. In Pope, K. S. & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), The stream of consciousness: Scientific investigations into the flow of human experience (pp. 117–157). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1953). Models of man. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74, 29–39.Google Scholar

Smith, G. T., Fischer, S., Cyders, M. A., Annus, A. M., Spillane, N. S., & McCarthy, D. M. (2007). On the validity and utility of discriminating among impulsivity-like traits. Assessment, 14, 155–170.Google Scholar

Smith, G. T., Guller, L., & Zapolski, T. C. (2013). A comparison of two models of urgency: Urgency predicts both rash action and depression in youth. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 266–275.Google Scholar

Snyder, H. R., Young, J. F., & Hankin, B. L. (2017). Strong homotypic continuity in common psychopathology-, internalizing- and externalizing-specific factors over time in adolescents. Clinical Psychological Science, 5, 98–110.Google Scholar

Solanto, M. V., Abikoff, H., Sonuga-Barke, E., Schachar, R., Logan, G. D., Wigal, T., … Turkel, E. (2001). The ecological validity of delay aversion and response inhibition as measures of impulsivity in AD/HD: A supplement to the NIMH multimodal treatment study of AD/HD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 215–228.Google Scholar

Sperry, S. H., Lynam, D. P., & Kwapil, T. R. (2018). The convergence and divergence of impulsivity facets in daily life. Journal of Personality, 86, 841–852.Google Scholar

Spoont, M. R. (1992). Modulatory role of serotonin in neural information processing: Implications for human psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 330–350.Google Scholar

Stanford, M. S., & Barratt, E. S. (1992). Impulsivity and the multi-impulsive personality disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 831–834.Google Scholar

Steele, C. M., & Josephs, R. A. (1990). Alcohol myopia: Its prized and dangerous effects. American Psychologist, 45, 921–933.Google Scholar

Tackett, J. L., Lahey, B. B., van Hulle, C., Waldman, I., Krueger, R. F., & Rathouz, P. J. (2013). Common genetic influences on negative emotionality and a general psychopathology factor in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 1142–1153.Google Scholar

Toates, F. (2006). A model of the hierarchy of behaviour, cognition, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 15, 75–118.Google Scholar

Tops, M., Boksem, M. A. S., Luu, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2010). Brain substrates of behavioral programs associated with self-regulation. Frontiers in Neurosciences, 1, 1–14.Google Scholar

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.Google Scholar

Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.) (2016). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (4th ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Waldman, I. D., Poore, H. E., van Hulle, C., Rathouz, P. J., & Lahey, B. B. (2016). External validity of a hierarchical dimensional model of child and adolescent psychopathology: Tests using confirmatory factor analyses and multivariate behavior genetic analyses. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 1053–1066.Google Scholar

White, J. L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Bartusch, D. J., Needles, D. J., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1994). Measuring impulsivity and examining its relationship to delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 192–205.Google Scholar

Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five-Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689.Google Scholar

Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2003). Understanding the role of impulsivity and externalizing psychopathology in alcohol abuse: Application of the UPPS impulsive behavior scale. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 210–217.Google Scholar

Whiteside, S. P., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Reynolds, S. K. (2005). Validation of the UPPS impulsive behavior scale: A four-factor model of impulsivity. European Journal of Personality, 19, 559–574.Google Scholar

Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2007). A new look at habits and the habit–goal interface. Psychological Review, 114, 843–863.Google Scholar

Wood, W., & Rünger, D. (2016). Psychology of habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 289–314.Google Scholar

Wortman, C. B., & Brehm, J. W. (1975). Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 277–336). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Schulz, R. (2003). The importance of goal disengagement in adaptive self-regulation: When giving up is beneficial. Self and Identity, 2, 1–20.Google Scholar

Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Miller, G. E., Schulz, R., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: Goal disengagement, goal re-engagement, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1494–1508.Google Scholar

Zelenski, J. M., & Larsen, R. J. (1999). Susceptibility to affect: A comparison of three personality taxonomies. Journal of Personality, 67, 761–791.Google Scholar

References

Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1978). Introduction to motivation (2nd ed.). New York: D. Van Nostrand Company.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Aaker, J. L ., & Garbinsky, E. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 505–516).Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. (2016). Toward a general theory of motivation: Problems, challenges, opportunities, and the big picture. Motivation & Emotion, 40, 1–10.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2012). Cybernetic control processes and the self-regulation of behavior. In Ryan, R. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 28–42). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Corr, P. J., DeYoung, C. G., & McNaughton, N. (2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 158–175.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Koestner, R. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.Google Scholar

Dember, W. N. (1974). Motivation and the cognitive revolution. American Psychologist, 29, 161–168.Google Scholar

Di Domenico, S., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). The Emerging Neuroscience of Intrinsic Motivation: A New Frontier in Self-Determination Research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11.Google Scholar

Dunning, D. (2016). Systems approaches to the treatment of motivation in human action: Three notes. Motivation & Emotion, 40, 27–30.Google Scholar

Dunning, D., & Anderson, J. (2014). Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect that expectation of reward. Journal of Personality Psychology, 107, 122–141.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124, 689–719.Google Scholar

Hmel, B. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2002). The meaning of autonomy: On and beyond the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality, 70, 277–310.Google Scholar

Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410–422.Google Scholar

Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280.Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Lewis, M., & Sutton, A. (2011). Understanding exercise behaviour: Examining the interaction of exercise motivation and personality in predicting exercise frequency. Journal of Sport Behavior, 34, 82–97.Google Scholar

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well–being. Journal of Personality, 84, 750–764.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (1997). An introduction to the cognitive science of personality and emotion. In Matthews, G. (Ed.), Cognitive science perspectives on personality and emotion (pp. 3–30). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (2001). Levels of transaction: A cognitive science framework for operator stress. In Hancock, P. A. & Desmond, P. A. (Eds.), Stress, workload, and fatigue (pp. 5–33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (2008). Personality and information processing: A cognitive-adaptive theory. In Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality theories and models (Vol. 1, pp. 56–79). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Mathews, G. (2009). Personality and performance: Cognitive processes and models. In Corr, P. J. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 400–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mayer, J. D. (2005). A tale of two visions: Can a new view of personality help integrate psychology. American Psychologist, 60, 294–307.Google Scholar

Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Olesen, M. H., Thomsen, D. K., & O’Toole, M. S. (2015). Subjective well-being: Above neuroticism and extraversion, autonomy motivation matters. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 45–49.Google Scholar

Phillips, P., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2003). Personality, cognition, and university students’ examination performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, 435–448.Google Scholar

Reeve, J. (2015). Understanding motivation and emotion (6th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Reeve, J. (2016). A grand theory of motivation: Why not? Motivation and Emotion, 40, 31–35.Google Scholar

Reeve, J., & Woogul, L. (2012). Neuroscience and human motivation. In Ryan, R. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of motivation (pp. 365–380). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Romero, E., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A., & Villar, P. (2012). Life aspirations, personality traits and subjective well-being in a Spanish sample. European Journal of Personality, 26, 45–55.Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 66–78.Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. In John, L. A., Robins, O. P. & Pervin, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 654–678). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Sheldon, K. M. (2011). Integrating behavioral-motive and experiential-requirement perspectives on psychological needs: A two process model. Psychological Review, 118, 552--569.Google Scholar

Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Kasser, T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It’s both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 475–486.Google Scholar

Sulea, C., van Beek, I., Sarbescu, P., Virga, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Engagement, boredom, and burnout among students: Basic need satisfaction matters more than personality traits. Learning & Individual Differences, 42, 132–138.Google Scholar

Szalma, J. L. (2008). Individual differences in stress reaction. In Hancock, P. A. & Szalma, J. L. (Eds.), Performance under stress (pp. 323–357). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Szalma, J. L. (2009). Individual differences: incorporating human variation into human factors/ergonomics research and practice. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10, 381–397.Google Scholar

Szalma, J. L. (2014). On the application of motivation theory to human factors/ergonomics: Motivational design principles for human-technology interaction. Human Factors, 56, 1453–1471.Google Scholar

Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271–360). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Veroff, J. (1957). Development and validation of a projective measure of power motivation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 1–8.Google Scholar

Weiner, B. (2012). An attribution theory of motivation. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W. & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 135–155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

References

Alicke, M. D., & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In Alicke, M. D., Dunning, D. A. & Krueger, J. I. (Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp. 85–106). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 1–48.Google Scholar

Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2011). Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Oxford: Holt.Google Scholar

Anusic, I., & Schimmack, U. (2016). Stability and change of personality traits, self-esteem, and well-being: Introducing the meta-analytic stability and change model of retest correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 766–781.Google Scholar

Anusic, I., Schimmack, U., Pinkus, R. T., & Lockwood, P. (2009). The nature and structure of the correlations among the Big Five ratings: The halo-alpha-beta model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1142–1156.Google Scholar

Asendorpf, J. B., & Ostendorf, F. (1998). Is self-enhancement healthy? Conceptual, psychometric, and empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 955–966.Google Scholar

Ayduk, O., Gyurak, A., Akinola, M., & Mendes, W. B. (2013). Consistency over flattery: Self-verification processes revealed in implicit and behavioral responses to feedback. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 538–545.Google Scholar

Barrett, L. F., Robin, L., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Eyssell, K. M. (1998). Are women the “more emotional” sex? Evidence from emotional experiences in social context. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 555–578.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680–740). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 1–44.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57, 547–579.Google Scholar

Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750.Google Scholar

Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.Google Scholar

Bolger, N., & Schilling, E. A. (1991). Personality and the problems of everyday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. Journal of Personality, 59, 355–386.Google Scholar

Bowling, N. A., & Burns, G. N. (2010). A comparison of work-specific and general personality measures as predictors of work and non-work criteria. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 95–101.Google Scholar

Brown, J. D., & McGill, K. L. (1989). The costs of good fortune: When positive life events produce negative health consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1103–1110.Google Scholar

Brown, N. R. (1995). Estimation strategies and the judgment of event frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1539–1553.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3–25.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 538–549.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141–156.Google Scholar

Cheek, J. M., & Buss, A. H. (1981). Shyness and sociability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 330–339.Google Scholar

Clore, G. L., & Robinson, M. D. (2012). Knowing our emotions: How do we know what we feel? In Vazire, S. & Wilson, T. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 194–209). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Conner, T. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). Trends in ambulatory self-report: The role of momentary experience in somatic medicine. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 327–337.Google Scholar

Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853–863.Google Scholar

Dalal, R. S., Meyer, R. D., Bradshaw, R. P., Green, J. P., Kelly, E. D., & Zhu, M. (2015). Personality strength and situational influences on behavior: A conceptual review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41, 261–287.Google Scholar

DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.Google Scholar

Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1285–1302.Google Scholar

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61, 305–314.Google Scholar

Diener, E., Napa Scollon, C. K., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgments: Global happiness is not the sum of its parts. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 159–176.Google Scholar

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.Google Scholar

Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.Google Scholar

Ditto, P. H., & Boardman, A. F. (1995). Perceived accuracy of favorable and unfavorable psychological feedback. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 137–157.Google Scholar

Donahue, E. M., & Harary, K. (1998). The patterned inconsistency of traits: Mapping the differential effects of social roles on self-perceptions of the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 610–619.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. L. (1966). Relationship between probability of endorsement and social desirability scale value for a set of 2,824 personality statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 238–239.Google Scholar

Erdle, S., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2009). Does self-esteem account for the higher-order factors of the Big Five? Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 921–922.Google Scholar

Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.Google Scholar

Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114.Google Scholar

Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670.Google Scholar

Funder, D. C. (2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120–126.Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617–638.Google Scholar

Gregg, A. P. (2009). Is identity per se irrelevant? A contrarian view of self-verification effects. Depression and Anxiety, 26, 49–59.Google Scholar

Hafdahl, A. R., Panter, A. T., Gramzow, R. H., Sedikides, C., & Insko, C. A. (2000). Free-response self-discrepancies across, among, and within FFM personality dimensions. Journal of Personality, 68, 111–151.Google Scholar

Heimpel, S. A., Wood, J. V., Marshall, M. A., & Brown, J. D. (2002). Do people with low self-esteem really want to feel better? Self-esteem differences in motivation to repair negative moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 128–147.Google Scholar

Hepper, E. G., Gramzow, R. H., & Sedikides, C. (2010). Individual differences in self-enhancement and self-protection strategies: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality, 78, 781–814.Google Scholar

Hepper, E. G., Hart, C. M., Gregg, A. P., & Sedikides, C. (2011). Motivated expectations of positive feedback in social interactions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 455–477.Google Scholar

Houtveen, J. H., & Oei, N. Y. L. (2007). Recall bias in reporting medically unexplained symptoms comes from semantic memory. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 62, 277–282.Google Scholar

Hunthausen, J. M., Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., & Hammer, L. B. (2003). A field study of frame-of-reference effects on personality test validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 545–551.Google Scholar

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar

John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521–551.Google Scholar

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Joiner, T. E., & Metalsky, G. I. (1995). A prospective test of an integrative interpersonal theory of depression: A naturalistic study of college roommates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 778–788.Google Scholar

Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from the controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23–34.Google Scholar

Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1–26.Google Scholar

Klein, S. B., Cosmides, L., & Costabile, K. A. (2003). Preserved knowledge of self in a case of Alzheimer’s dementia. Social Cognition, 21, 157–165.Google Scholar

Klein, S. B., & Lax, M. L. (2010). The unanticipated resilience of trait self-knowledge in the face of neural damage. Memory, 18, 918–948.Google Scholar

Klein, S. B., & Loftus, J. (1993). Behavioral experience and trait judgments about the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 740–745.Google Scholar

Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1996b). Self-knowledge of an amnesic patient: Toward a neuropsychology of personality and social psychology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 250–260.Google Scholar

Klein, S. B., Sherman, J. W., & Loftus, J. (1996a). The role of episodic and semantic memory in the development of trait self-knowledge. Social Cognition, 14, 277–291.Google Scholar

Klinger, E. (1999). Thought flow: Properties and mechanisms underlying shifts in content. In Singer, J. A. & Salovey, P. (Eds.), At play in the fields of consciousness: Essays in honor of Jerome L. Singer (pp. 29–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Köber, C., & Habermas, T. (2017). How stable is the personal past? Stability of most important autobiographical memories and life narratives across eight years in a life span sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 608–626.Google Scholar

Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58–75.Google Scholar

Larsen, R. J. (1992). Neuroticism and selective encoding and recall of symptoms: Evidence from a combined concurrent-retrospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 480–488.Google Scholar

Leising, D., Scherbaum, S., Locke, K. D., & Zimmermann, J. (2015). A model of “substance” and “evaluation” in person judgments. Journal of Research in Personality, 57, 61–71.Google Scholar

Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2001). Understanding extraverts’ enjoyment of social situations: The importance of pleasantness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 343–356.Google Scholar

Luo, Y. L. L., Liu, Y., Cai, H., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C. (2016). Nostalgia and self-enhancement: Phenotypic and genetic approaches. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 857–866.Google Scholar

Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Personality, 38, 299–337.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.Google Scholar

McAdams, D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63, 365–396.Google Scholar

McAdams, D. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 272–295.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1982). Self-concept and the stability of personality: Cross-sectional comparisons of self-reports and ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1282–1292.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1994). The stability of personality: Observation and evaluations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 173–175.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.Google Scholar

McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1988). Content and process in the experience of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 97–144.Google Scholar

Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Mitchell, T. R., Thompson, L., Peterson, E., & Cronk, R. (1997). Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: The “rosy view.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 421–448.Google Scholar

Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality tests for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 60, 1029–1049.Google Scholar

Mulder, L. B., & Aquino, K. (2013). The role of moral identity in the aftermath of dishonesty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 219–230.Google Scholar

Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233.Google Scholar

Oishi, S. (2002). The experiencing and remembering of well-being: A cross-cultural analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1398–1406.Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L., Harms, P. D., Bruce, M. N., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 890–904.Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025–1060.Google Scholar

Pervin, L. A. (1994). A critical analysis of current trait theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 103–113.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Plomin, R., & Caspi, A. (1999). Behavioral genetics and personality. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 251–276). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W. (2007). Contextualizing personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 75, 1071–1082.Google Scholar

Robins, R. W., Tracy, J. L., Trzesniewski, K., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2001). Personality correlates of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 463–482.Google Scholar

Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002a). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 198–215.Google Scholar

Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002b). Belief and feeling: An accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934–960.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2007). Traits, states, and encoding speed: Support for a top-down view of neuroticism/stress relations. Journal of Personality, 75, 95–120.Google Scholar

Robinson, M. D., Goetz, M. C., Wilkowski, B. M., & Hoffman, S. J. (2006). Driven to tears or to joy: Response dominance and trait-based predictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 629–640.Google Scholar

Robinson, M. D., Johnson, J. T., & Shields, S. A. (1998). The gender heuristic and the database: Factors affecting the perception of gender-related differences in the experience and display of emotions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 206–219.Google Scholar

Robinson, M. D., & Oishi, S. (2006). Trait self-report as a “fill in” belief system: Categorization speed moderates the extraversion/life satisfaction relation. Self and Identity, 5, 15–34.Google Scholar

Robinson, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Traits and the self: Toward an integration. In Corr, P. J. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 457–472). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Robinson, M. D., Solberg, E. C., Vargas, P., & Tamir, M. (2003). Trait as default: Extraversion, subjective well-being, and the distinction between neutral and positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 517–527.Google Scholar

Robinson, M. D., Wilkowski, B. M., Kirkeby, B. S., & Meier, B. P. (2006). Stuck in a rut: Perseverative response tendencies and the neuroticism/distress relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 78–91.Google Scholar

Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Saucier, G. (1994). Separating description and evaluation in the structure of personality attributes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 141–154.Google Scholar

Schell, T. L., Klein, S. B., & Babey, S. H. (1996). Testing a hierarchical model of self-knowledge. Psychological Science, 7, 170–173.Google Scholar

Schmit, M. J., Ryan, A. M., Stierwalt, S. L., & Powell, A. B. (1995). Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 607–620.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Cai, H. (2015). On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: The case for the universality of self-esteem. Advances in Motivation Science, 2, 185–241.Google Scholar

Sedikides, C., & Gebauer, J. E. (2010). Religiosity as self-enhancement: A meta-analysis of the relation between socially desirable responding and religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 17–36.Google Scholar

Sedikides, C., Green, J. D., Saunders, J., Skowronski, J. J., & Zengel, B. (2016). Mnemic neglect: Selective amnesia of one’s faults. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 1–62.Google Scholar

Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2003). Portraits of the self. In Hogg, M. A. & Cooper, J. (Eds.), Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 110–138). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102–116.Google Scholar

Sedikides, C., Hoorens, V., & Dufner, M. (2015b). Self-enhancing self-presentation: Interpersonal, relational, and organizational implications. In Guay, F., McInerney, D. M., Craven, R. & Marsh, H. W. (Eds.), Self-concept, motivation and identity: Underpinning success with research and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 29–55). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (2000). Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 14, 407–428.Google Scholar

Suls, J., & Martin, R. (2005). The daily life of the garden-variety neurotic: Reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping. Journal of Personality, 73, 1485–1510.Google Scholar

Swann, W. B. (1992). Seeking “truth,” finding despair: Some unhappy consequences of a negative self-concept. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 15–18.Google Scholar

Swann, W. B., & Ely, R. J. (1984). A battle of wills: Self-verification versus behavioral confirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1287–1302.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Swann, W. B., Rentfrow, P. J., & Guinn, J. (2003). Self-verification: The search for coherence. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 367–383). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Tamir, M., Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). The epistemic benefits of trait-consistent mood states: An analysis of extraversion and mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 663–677.Google Scholar

Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–322.Google Scholar

Trzesniewski, K. H., Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2003). Stability of self-esteem across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 205–220.Google Scholar

Van Boven, L., & Robinson, M. D. (2012). Boys don’t cry: Cognitive load and priming increase stereotypic sex differences in emotion memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 303–309.Google Scholar

Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96, 234–254.Google Scholar

Watson, D., Suls, J., & Haig, J. (2002). Global self-esteem in relation to structural models of personality and affectivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 185–197.Google Scholar

Werner, P. D., & Pervin, L. A. (1986). The content of personality inventory items. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 622–628.Google Scholar

Winter, D. G., John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230–250.Google Scholar

Wood, D., & Roberts, B. W. (2006). Cross-sectional and longitudinal tests of the personality and role identity structural model (PRISM). Journal of Personality, 74, 779–809.Google Scholar

Wood, D., & Wortman, J. (2012). Trait means and desirabilities as artifactual and real sources of differential stability of personality traits. Journal of Personality, 80, 665–701.Google Scholar

Wood, J. V., Hempel, S. A., Manwell, L. A., & Whittington, E. J. (2009). This mood is familiar and I don’t deserve to feel better anyway: Mechanisms underlying self-esteem differences in motivation to repair sad moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 363–380.Google Scholar

References

Allen, T. A., & DeYoung, C. G. (2017). Personality neuroscience and the Five Factor Model. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 319–352) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Oxford, UK: Holt.Google Scholar

Back, M. D. (2018). Continued quality, openness, and curiosity at the European Journal of Personality. European Journal of Personality, 32, 3–5.Google Scholar

Baird, B., Le, K., & Lucas, R. (2006). On the nature of intraindividual personality variability: Reliability, validity, and associations with well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 512–527.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. London: W. H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In Pervin, L. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar

Baumert, A., Schmitt, M., Perugini, M., Johnson, W., Blum, G., & Borkenau, P., … Wrzus, C. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 503–528.Google Scholar

Blackie, L. E., Roepke, A. M., Forgeard, M. J., Jayawickreme, E., & Fleeson, W. (2014). Act well to be well: The promise of changing personality states to promote well‐being. The Wiley Blackwell handbook of positive psychological interventions (pp. 462–474). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2009). Patterns and sources of adult personality development: Growth curve analyses of the NEO-PI-R scales in a longitudinal twin study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 142–155.Google Scholar

Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., Hülsheger, U., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. (2010). Nature and nurture of the interplay between personality traits and major life goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 366–379.Google Scholar

Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2012). Genetic and environmental influences on personality profile stability: Unraveling the normativeness problem. Journal of Personality, 80, 1029–1060.Google Scholar

Block, J. (1993). Studying personality the long way. In Funder, D. C., Parke, R. D., Tomlinson-Keasy, C. & Widaman, K. (Eds.), Studying lives through time (pp. 9–41). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Borgatta, E. (1964). The structure of personality characteristics. Behavioral Science, 9, 8–17.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126.Google Scholar

Cattell, R., Cattell, A., & Rhymer, R. (1947). P-technique demonstrated in determining psychophysiological source traits in a normal individual. Psychometrika, 12, 267–288.Google Scholar

Corr, P. J. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST): Introduction. In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 1–43). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). Concurrent validation after 20 years: Implications of personality stability for its assessment. In Butcher, J. N. & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 4, pp. 31–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2017). The NEO Inventories as instruments of psychological theory. The Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 11–37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cramer, A., Waldorp, L., van der Maas, H., & Borsboom, D. (2010). Comorbidity: A network perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 137–150.Google Scholar

de Raad, B., & Mlačić, B. (2017). The lexical foundation of the Big Five Factor Model. In Widiger, T., The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model (pp. 191–216). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five Theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., & Krueger, R. F. (2018). A cybernetic theory of psychopathology. Psychological Inquiry, 29, 117–138.Google Scholar

Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Pavot, W., & Fujita, F. (1992). Extraversion and subjective well-being in a U.S. national probability sample. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 205–215.Google Scholar

Digman, J., & Takemoto-Chock, N. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Re-analysis, comparison, and interpretation of six major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 149–170.Google Scholar

Epstein, S. (1983). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360–392.Google Scholar

Fiske, D. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329–344.Google Scholar

Fleeson, W. (2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825–861.Google Scholar

Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole Trait Theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92.Google Scholar

Fleeson, W., & Jolley, S. (2006). A proposed theory of the adult development of intraindividual variability in trait-manifesting behavior. In Mroczek, D. K. & Little, T. D. (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 41–59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar

Fleeson, W., Malanos, A., & Achille, N. (2002). An intraindividual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: Is acting extraverted as “good” as being extraverted? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1409–1422.Google Scholar

Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. (2008). The end of the person–situation debate: An emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1667–1684.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fleeson, W., & Wilt, J. (2010). The relevance of Big Five trait content in behavior to subjective authenticity: Do high levels of within-person behavioral variability undermine or enable authenticity achievement? Journal of Personality, 78, 1353–1382.Google Scholar

Fridhandler, B. (1986). Conceptual note on state, trait, and the state-trait distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 169–174.Google Scholar

Friedman, H., Tucker, J., Tomlinson-Keasey, C., Schwartz, J., Wingard, D., & Criqui, M. (1993). Does childhood personality predict longevity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 176–185.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197–221.Google Scholar

Gerpott, F., Balliet, D., Columbus, S., Molho, C., & de Vries, R. (2017). How do people think about interdependence? A multidimensional model of subjective outcome interdependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 716–742.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. Advances in Personality Assessment, 1, 203–234.Google Scholar

Graziano, W. G., & Tobin, R. M. (2009). Agreeableness. In Leary, M. R. & Hoyle, R. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 46–61). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hampson, S. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin.” Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315–339.Google Scholar

Horstmann, K. T., & Ziegler, M. (2019). Situational perception and affect: Barking up the wrong tree. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 132–139.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hudson, N., & Fraley, R. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 490–507.Google Scholar

Hudson, N., Roberts, B., & Lodi-Smith, J. (2012). Personality trait development and social investment in work. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 334–344.Google Scholar

Jackson, J. J., Hill, P. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2012). Misconceptions of traits continue to persist: A response to Bandura. Journal of Management, 38, 745–752.Google Scholar

Jackson, J. J., & Roberts, B. W. (2017). Conscientiousness. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jayawickreme, E., & Blackie, L. (2014). Post-traumatic growth as positive personality change: Evidence, controversies and future directions. European Journal of Personality, 28, 312–331.Google Scholar

Jayawickreme, E., Meindl, P., Helzer, E., Furr, R., & Fleeson, W. (2014). Virtuous states and virtuous traits: How the empirical evidence regarding the existence of broad traits saves virtue ethics from the situationist critique. Theory and Research in Education, 12, 283–308.Google Scholar

Jayawickreme, E., & Fleeson, W. (2017). Does Whole Trait Theory work for the virtues? In Sinnott-Armstrong, W. and Miller, C. B. (Eds), Moral Psychology, Volume V: Virtue and Happiness (pp. 75–103). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jayawickreme, E., Zachry, C. E., & Fleeson, W. (2019). Whole Trait Theory: An integrative approach to examining personality structure and process. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 2–11.Google Scholar

Jensen-Campbell, L., Adams, R., Perry, D., Workman, K., Furdella, J., & Egan, S. (2002). Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relations in early adolescence: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 224–251.CrossRef Google Scholar

John, O. P. (1989). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors. In Buss, D. M. & Cantor, N. (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 261–271). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W. & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (p. 114–158). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Kandler, C., Zimmermann, J., & McAdams, D. P. (2014). Core and surface characteristics for the description and theory of personality differences and development. European Journal of Personality, 28, 231–243.Google Scholar

Kern, M., & Friedman, H. (2008). Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychology, 27, 505–512.Google Scholar

Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2011). Personality development across the life span: Longitudinal analyses with a national sample from Germany. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 847–861.Google Scholar

Lüdtke, O., Roberts, B., Trautwein, U., & Nagy, G. (2011). A random walk down university avenue: Life paths, life events, and personality trait change at the transition to university life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 620–637.Google Scholar

McCabe, K., & Fleeson, W. (2012). What is extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychological Science, 23, 1498–1505.Google Scholar

McCabe, K. O., & Fleeson, W. (2012). What is extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychological Science, 23, 1498–1505.Google Scholar

McCabe, K., & Fleeson, W. (2016). Are traits useful? Explaining trait manifestations as tools in the pursuit of goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 287–301.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W. & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 159–181). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

McNiel, J., & Fleeson, W. (2006). The causal effects of extraversion on positive affect and neuroticism on negative affect: Manipulating state extraversion and state neuroticism in an experimental approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 529–550.Google Scholar

McNiel, J., Lowman, J., & Fleeson, W. (2010). The effect of state extraversion on four types of affect. European Journal of Personality, 24, 18–35.Google Scholar

Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.Google Scholar

Mischel, W. (2009). From personality and assessment (1968) to personality science. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 282–290.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.Google Scholar

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (2008). Toward a unified theory of personality: Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within the Cognitive-Affective Processing System (CAPS). In John, O. P., Robins, R. W. & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality (3rd ed., pp. 208–241). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Noftle, E., & Fleeson, W. (2010). Age differences in Big Five behavior averages and variabilities across the adult life span: Moving beyond retrospective, global summary accounts of personality. Psychology and Aging, 25, 95–107.Google Scholar

Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.Google Scholar

Parrigon, S., Woo, S., Tay, L., & Wang, T. (2017). CAPTION-ing the situation: A lexically-derived taxonomy of psychological situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 642–681.Google Scholar

Rauthmann, J., Gallardo-Pujol, D., Guillaume, E., Todd, E., Nave, C., & Sherman, R., … Todd, E. (2014). The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677–718.Google Scholar

Rauthmann, J., & Sherman, R. (2018). The description of situations: Towards replicable domains of psychological situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 482–488.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Read, S., Monroe, B., Brownstein, A., Yang, Y., Chopra, G., & Miller, L. (2010). A neural network model of the structure and dynamics of human personality. Psychological Review, 117, 61–92.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. (2017). A revised Sociogenomic Model of personality traits. Journal of Personality, 86, 23–35.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Roberts, B., & DelVecchio, W. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., Hill, P. L., & Davis, J. P. (2017). How to change conscientiousness: The sociogenomic trait intervention model. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8, 199–205.Google Scholar

Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Oppenheim, S., Elster, A., & Gal, A. (2014). Integrating content and structure aspects of the self: Traits, values, and self‐improvement. Journal of Personality, 82, 144–157.Google Scholar

Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sherman, R., Rauthmann, J., Brown, N., Serfass, D., & Jones, A. (2015). The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 872–888.Google Scholar

Shoda, Y., LeeTiernan, S., & Mischel, W. (2002). Personality as a dynamical system: Emergence of stability and distinctiveness from intra- and interpersonal interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 316–325.Google Scholar

Snyder, M. (2006). Building bridges between personality and social psychology: Understanding the ties that bind persons and situations: The benefits of transdisciplinary approaches. In Van Lange, P. A. M. (Ed.), Bridging social psychology: The benefits of transdisciplinary approaches (pp. 187–191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Snyder, M., & Stukas, A. (1999). Interpersonal processes: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 273–303.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Soto, C., & John, O. P. (2016). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117–143.Google Scholar

Soto, C., John, O. P., Gosling, S., & Potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 330–348.Google Scholar

Spielberg, J., Miller, G., Engels, A., Herrington, J., Sutton, B., Banich, M., & Heller, W. (2011). Trait approach and avoidance motivation: Lateralized neural activity associated with executive function. Neuroimage, 54, 661–670.Google Scholar

Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961) Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. USAF ASD Tech. Rep. No. 61–97, Lackland Airforce Base, TX: US Air Force.Google Scholar

Van Der Maas, H., Dolan, C., Grasman, R., Wicherts, J., Huizenga, H., & Raijmakers, M. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113, 842–861.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Widiger, T. A. (Ed.) (2017). The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilt, J., & Revelle, W. (2017). A personality perspective on situations. In Funder, D., Rauthmann, J. & Sherman, R. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of psychological situations. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Wilt, J., & Revelle, W. (2019). The Big Five, everyday contexts and activities, and affective experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 140–147.Google Scholar

Wood, D., & Wortman, J. (2012). Trait means and desirabilities as artifactual and real sources of differential stability of personality traits. Journal of Personality, 80, 665–701.Google Scholar

Wright, A. G. (2017). Factor analytic support for the five-factor model. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 217–242). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wright, A., & Hopwood, C. (2016). Advancing the assessment of dynamic psychological processes. Assessment, 23, 399–403.Google Scholar

Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. (2016). Processes of personality development in adulthood: The TESSERA framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 253–277.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zelenski, J., Whelan, D., Nealis, L., Besner, C., Santoro, M., & Wynn, J. (2013). Personality and affective forecasting: Trait introverts underpredict the hedonic benefits of acting extraverted. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 1092–1108.Google Scholar

Ziegler, M. (2014). Stop and state your intentions!: Let’s not forget the ABC of test construction [Editorial]. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 239–242.Google Scholar

Zillig, L., Hemenover, S., & Dienstbier, R. (2002). What do we assess when we assess a Big 5 trait? A content analysis of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes represented in Big 5 personality inventories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 847–858.Google Scholar

References

Andrews, P. W., & Thomson, J. A. (2009). The bright side of being blue: Depression as an adaptation for analyzing complex problems. Psychological Review, 116, 620–654.Google Scholar

Armstrong, T., & Olatunji, B. (2012). Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 704–723.Google Scholar

Bardeen, J. R., & Orcutt, H. K. (2011). Attentional control as a moderator of the relationship between post-traumatic stress symptoms and attentional threat bias. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 1008–1018.Google Scholar

Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and non-anxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.Google Scholar

Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Beck, A. T., & Duzois, D. J. A. (2011). Cognitive therapy: Current status and future directions. Annual Review of Medicine, 62, 397–409.Google Scholar

Beck, A. T., Brown, G., Steer, R. A., Eidelson, J. L., & Riskid, J. H. (1987). Differentiating anxiety and depression: A test of the cognitive content-specificity hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 179–183.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bethell, E. J., Holmes, A., Maclarnon, A., & Semple, S. (2012a). Cognitive bias in a non-human primate: Husbandry procedures influence cognitive indicators of psychological well-being in captive rhesus macaques. Animal Welfare – The UFAW Journal, 21, 185–195.Google Scholar

Bethell, E. J., Holmes, A., MacLarnon, A., & Semple, S. (2012b). Evidence that emotion mediates social attention in rhesus macaques. PLOS One, 7, e44387.Google Scholar

Bethell, E. J., Holmes, A., MacLarnon, A., & Semple, S. (2016). Emotion evaluation and response slowing in a non-human primate: New directions for cognitive bias measures of animal emotion? Behavioral Sciences, 6, article 2.Google Scholar

Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 561–595.Google Scholar

Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 229–246.Google Scholar

Booth, R. W., Mackintosh, B., Mobini, S., Oztop, P., & Nunn, S. (2014). Cognitive bias modification of attention is less effective under working memory load. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38, 634–639.Google Scholar

Booth, R. W., Mackintosh, B., & Sharma, D. (2017). Working memory regulates trait anxiety-related threat processing biases. Emotion, 17, 616–627.Google Scholar

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.Google Scholar

Cristea, I. A., Kok, R. N., & Cuijpers, P. (2015). Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 206, 7–16.Google Scholar

Del Guidice, M., & Ellis, B. J. (2915). Evolutionary foundations of developmental psychopathology. In Ciccetti, D. (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology: Developmental neuroscience (Vol. 2, 3rd. ed., pp. 1–58). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 225–236.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Disner, S. G., Beevers, C. G., Haigh, E. A., & Beck, A. T. (2011). Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 467–477.Google Scholar

Donaldson, C., Lam, D., & Mathews, A. (2007). Rumination and attention in major depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2664–2678.Google Scholar

Durisko, Z., Mulsant, B. H., & Andrews, P. W. (2015). An adaptationist perspective on the aetiology of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 172, 315–323.Google Scholar

Everaert, J., Grahek, I., & Koster, E. H. W. (2017a). Individual differences in cognitive control over emotional material modules cognitive biases linked to depressive symptoms. Cognition and Emotion, 31, 736–746.Google Scholar

Everaert, J., Podina, I. R., & Koster, E. H. W. (2017b). A comprehensive meta-analysis of interpretation bias in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 58, 33–48.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.CrossRef Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W. (1997). Anxiety and cognition: A unified theory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W. (2016). Hans Eysenck: A research evaluation. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 209–219.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W., & Fajkowska, M. (2018). Anxiety and depression: Toward overlapping and distinctive features. Cognition and Emotion, 32, 1391–1400.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2015). Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook (7th ed.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1987). Cognitive functioning and anxiety. Psychological Research, 49, 189–195.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W., Mogg, K., May, J., Richards, A., & Mathews, A. (1991). Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 144–150.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W., Payne, S., & Santos, R. (2006). Anxiety and depression: Past, present, and future events. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 274–294.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W., & Van Berkum, J. (1992). Trait anxiety, defensiveness, and the structure of worry. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 1285–1290.Google Scholar

Foland-Ross, L. C., & Gotlib, I. H. (2012). Cognitive and neural aspects of information processing in major depressive disorder: An integrative perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, article 489.Google Scholar

Gaddy, M. A., & Ingram, R. E. (2014). A meta-analytic review of mood-congruent implicit memory in depressed mood. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 402–416.Google Scholar

Gotlib, I., & Cane, D. B. (1987). Construct accessibility and clinical depression: A Longitudinal investigation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 199–204.Google Scholar

Gotlib, I., & McCann, C. D. (1984). Construct accessibility and depression: An examination of cognitive and affective factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 427–439.Google Scholar

Grafton, B., MacLeod, C., Rudaizky, D., Holmes, E. A., Salemink, E., Fox, E., & Notebaert, L. (2017). Confusing procedures with process when appraising the impact of cognitive bias modification on emotional vulnerability. British Journal of Psychiatry, 211, 266–271.Google Scholar

Hallion, L. S., & Ruscio, A. M. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 940–958.Google Scholar

Harding, E. J., Paul, E. S., & Mendl, M. (2004). Animal behavior: Cognitive bias and affective state. Nature, 427, 312.Google Scholar

Heeren, A., De Raedt, R., Koster, E. H. W., & Philpott, P. (2013). The (neuro)cognitive mechanisms behind attention bias modification in anxiety: Proposals based on theoretical accounts of attentional bias. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, article 119.Google Scholar

Herrera, S., Montorio, I., Cabrera, I., & Botella, J. (2017). Memory bias for threatening information related to anxiety: An updated meta-analytic review. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29, 832–854.Google Scholar

Hertel, P. T., & El-Messidi, L. (2006). Am I blue? Depressed mood and the consequences of self-focus for the interpretation and recall of ambiguous words. Behavior Therapy, 37, 259–268.Google Scholar

Holland, A. C., & Kensinger, E. A. (2010). Emotion and autobiographical memory. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 88–131.Google Scholar

Huppert, J. D. (2008). Anxiety disorders and depression comorbidity. In Antony, M. M. & Stein, M. B. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of anxiety and related disorders (pp. 572–587). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Joormann, J., Yoon, K. L., & Zestche, U. (2007). Cognitive inhibition in depression. Applied and Preventative Psychology, 12, 128–139.Google Scholar

Joormann, J., & Tanovic, E. (2015). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: Examining Cognitive control and emotion regulation. Current Opinions in Psychology, 4, 86–92.Google Scholar

Judah, M. R., Grant, D. M., Lechner, W. V., & Mills, A. C. (2013). Working memory load moderates late attentional bias in social anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 502–511.Google Scholar

Kaiser, R. H., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Spielberg, J. M., Warren, S. L., Sutton, B. P., Miller, G. A., … Banich, M. T. (2015). Distracted and down: Neural mechanisms of affective interference in subclinical depression. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10, 654–663.Google Scholar

Khazanov, G. K., & Ruscio, A. M. (2016). Is low positive emotionality a specific risk factor For depression? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 991–1015.Google Scholar

Koster, E. H. W., Hoorelbeke, K., Onraedt, T., Owens, M., & Derakshan, N. (2017). Cognitive control interventions for depression: A systematic review of findings from training studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 53, 79–92.Google Scholar

Lau, J. Y. F. (2015). Commentary: A glass half full or half empty? Cognitive bias Modification for mental health problems in children and adolescents – Reflections on the meta-analysis by Cristea et al. (2015). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 735–737.Google Scholar

Lemogne, C., Delaveau, P., Freton, M., Guionnet, S., & Fossati, P. (2012). Medial prefrontal cortex and the self in major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 136, e1–e11.Google Scholar

MacLeod, A. K. (2016). Prospection, well-being and memory. Memory Studies, 9, 266–274.Google Scholar

Mitte, K. (2008). Memory bias for threatening information in anxiety and anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 886–911.Google Scholar

Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14.Google Scholar

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.Google Scholar

Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., & Williams, R. (1995). Attentional bias in anxiety and depression: The role of awareness. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34, 17–36.Google Scholar

Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Williams, R., & Mathews, A. (1993). Subliminal processing of emotional information in anxiety and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 304–311.Google Scholar

Mogg, K., Waters, A. M., & Bradley, B. (2017). Attention bias modification (ABM): Review of effects of multi-session ABM on anxiety and threat-related attention in high-anxious individuals. Clinical Psychological Science, 5, 698–717.Google Scholar

Murphy, F. C., Michael, A., & Sahakian, B. J. (2012). Emotion modulates cognitive flexibility in patients with major depression. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1373–1382.Google Scholar

Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 29–50.Google Scholar

Olatunji, B. O., Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B., Sawchuk, C. N., & Ciesielski, B. G. (2010). Worry and the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic synthesis of specificity to GAD. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 14, 1–24.Google Scholar

Phillips, W. J., Hine, D. W., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2010). Implicit cognition and depression: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 691–709.Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. M., & Rose, P. (2014). Is depression the past tense of anxiety? An empirical study of the temporal distinction. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 446–452.Google Scholar

Raes, F., Hermans, D., Williams, J. M. G., Beyers, W., Eelen, P., & Brunfaut, E. (2006). Reduced autobiographical memory specificity and rumination in predicting the course of depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 699.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Richards, A., Blanchette, I., & Munjiza, J. (2007). Contextual influences in the resolution of ambiguity in anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 879–890.Google Scholar

Richards, A., Holmes, A., Pell, P. J., & Bethell, E. J. (2013). Adapting effects of emotional expression in anxiety: Evidence for an enhanced late positive potential. Social Neuroscience, 8, 650–664.Google Scholar

Rinaldi, L., Locati, F., Parolin, L., & Girelli, L. (2017). Distancing the present self from the past and the future: Psychological distance in anxiety and depression. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 1106–1113.Google Scholar

Sari, D. A., Koster, E. H. W., Pourtois, G., & Derakshan, N. (2016). Training working memory to improve attentional control in anxiety: A proof-of-principle study using behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Biological Psychology, 121, 203–212.Google Scholar

Saunders, B., & Jentzsch, I. (2014). Reactive and proactive control adjustments under increased depressive symptoms: Insights from the classic and emotional-face Stroop task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 684–698.Google Scholar

Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501–518.Google Scholar

Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., Hassabis, D., Martin, V. C., Spreng, R. N., & Szpunar, K. K. (2012). The future of memory: Remembering, imaging, and the brain. Neuron, 76, 677–694.Google Scholar

Starr, L. R., & Davila, J. (2012). Temporal patterns of anxious and depressed mood in generalized anxiety disorder: A daily diary study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 131–141.Google Scholar

Sumner, J. A., Griffith, J. W., & Mineka, S. (2010). Overgeneral autobiographical memory as a predictor of the course of depression: A meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 614–625.Google Scholar

Szpunar, K. K., Spreng, R. N., & Schacter, D. L. (2014). A taxonomy of prospection: Introducing an organizational framework for future-oriented cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 18414–18421.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. T., Cross, K., & Amir, N. (2016). Attentional control moderates the relationship between social anxiety symptoms and attentional disengagement from threatening information. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 50, 68–76.Google Scholar

Vukasović, T., & Bratko, D. (2015). Heritability of personality: A meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 769–785.Google Scholar

Walsh, J. J., McNally, M. A., Skariah, A., Butt, A. A., & Eysenck, M. W. (2015). Interpretive bias, repressive coping, and trait anxiety. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 28, 617–633.Google Scholar

Watson, D. (2009). Differentiating the mood and anxiety disorders: A quadpartite model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 221–247.Google Scholar

Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative Affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.Google Scholar

Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C. M., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar

Winer, E. S., & Salem, T. (2016). Reward devaluation: Dot-probe meta-analytic evidence of avoidance of positive information in depressed persons. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 18–78.Google Scholar

Wisco, B. E., & Nolen-Hoeksma, S. (2010). Interpretation bias and depression symptoms: The role of self-relevance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 1113–1122.Google Scholar

Wittchen, H.-U., Kessler, R. C., Pfister, H., & Lieb, M. (2000). Why do people with anxiety disorders become depressed? A prospective-longitudinal community study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 102, 14–23.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part V - Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives: Dynamic Processes of Personality

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive