Applications of Personality Psychology: Personality Traits and Processes in Action

Part VII - Applications of Personality Psychology: Personality Traits and Processes in Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020

Edited by

Philip J. Corr and

Gerald Matthews

Show author details

Philip J. Corr: Affiliation:
City, University London
Gerald Matthews: Affiliation:
University of Central Florida

Book contents

Get access

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology , pp. 425 - 493

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108264822 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alarcon, G., Eschleman, K. J., & Bowling, N. A. (2009). Relationships between personality variables and burnout: A meta-analysis. Work and Stress, 23, 244–263.CrossRef Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar

Anderson, N. (2005). Relationships between practice and research in personnel selection: Does the left hand know what the right is doing? In Evers, A., Anderson, N. & Voskuijl, O. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of personnel selection (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Anderson, N., & Gasteiger, R. (2007). Helping creativity and innovation thrive in organizations: Functional and dysfunctional perspectives. In Langan-Fox, J., Cooper, C. L. & Klimoski, R. (Eds.), Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms (pp. 422–440). London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Anderson, N., Salgado, J. F., & Hülsheger, U. R. (2010). Applicant reactions in selection: Comprehensive meta‐analysis into reaction generalization versus situational specificity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 291–304.Google Scholar

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.Google Scholar

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139–152.Google Scholar

Ashton, M. C., Paunonen, S. V., & Lee, K. (2014). On the validity of narrow and broad personality traits: A response to Salgado, Moscoso, and Berges (2013). Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 24–28.Google Scholar

Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.Google Scholar

Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 410–424.Google Scholar

Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 901–910.Google Scholar

Borman, W. C., & Conway, S. (2013). Validity of personality for predicting citizenship performance. In Christiansen, N. D. & Tett, R. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work (pp. 591–605). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Borman, W. C., & Penner, L. A. (2001). Citizenship performance: Its nature, antecedents, and motives. In Roberts, B. W. & Hogan, R. (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace (pp. 45–61). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 52–69.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B., & Brennan, J. (1994). Finding personality structure when ipsative measurements are the unavoidable basis of the variables. American Journal of Psychology, 107, 261–274.Google Scholar

Chang, C-H., Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Tan, J. (2012). Core self-evaluations: A review and evaluation of the literature. Journal of Management, 38, 81–128.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I., Berry, C. M., Li, N., & Gardner, R. (2011). The Five-Factor Model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1140–1166.Google Scholar

Clemans, W. V. (1966). An analytical and empirical examination of some properties of ipsative measures. Psychometric Monographs, 14, 1–56.Google Scholar

Credé, M., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stara, S., Dalal, R. S., & Bashshur, M. (2007). Job satisfaction as a mediator: An assessment of job satisfaction’s position within the nomological network. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 515–537.Google Scholar

Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1241–1255.Google Scholar

Dorsey, D. W., Cortina, J. M., Allen, M. T., Waters, S. D., Green, J. P., & Luchman, J. (2017). Adaptive and citizenship-related behaviors at work. In Farr, J. L. & Tippins, N. T. (Eds.), Handbook of personnel selection (pp. 448–475). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Liebicki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 40–57.Google Scholar

Foldes, H. J., Duerh, E. E., & Ones, D. S. (2008). Group differences in personality: Meta-analyses comparing five U.S. racial groups. Personnel Psychology, 61, 579–616.Google Scholar

Gaddis, B. H., & Foster, J. L. (2015). Meta-analysis of dark side personality characteristics and critical work behavior among leaders across the globe: Findings and implications for leadership development and executive coaching. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 64, 25–54.Google Scholar

Grijalva, E., & Newman, D. A. (2015). Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): Meta-analysis and consideration of collective culture, Big Five personality, and narcissism’s facet structure. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 64, 93–126.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers of the Big Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.CrossRef Google Scholar

Guenole, N. (2014). Maladaptive personality at work: Exploring the darkness. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 85–97.Google Scholar

Harari, M. B., Naemi, B., & Viswesvaran, C. (2019). Is the validity of conscientiousness stable across time? Testing the role of trait bandwidth. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92, 1–224.Google Scholar

Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K. A., Dupré, K. E., Inness, M., … Sivanathan, N. (2007). Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 228–238.Google Scholar

Hicks, L. E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 167–184.Google Scholar

Hoffman, B. J., & Dilchert, S. (2012). A review of citizenship and counter productive behaviors in organizational decision-making. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection (pp. 543–569). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2009). Hogan Development Survey (2nd ed.) Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.Google Scholar

Hough, L. M., & Dilchert, S. (2017). Personality: Its measurement and validity for employee selection. In Farr, J. L. & Tippins, N. T. (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (2nd ed., pp. 298–325). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R.E. (2001). Determinants, detection and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 152–194.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869–879.Google Scholar

Judge, T., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relations of core self-evaluations traits – self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability – with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92.Google Scholar

Judge, T., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., & Locke, E. A. (2000). Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237–249.Google Scholar

Judge, T., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-Factor Model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2006). Loving yourself abundantly: relationship of narcissistic personality to self-other perceptions of work deviance, Leadership and task and contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 762–776.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., Rodell, J. B., Klinger, R. L., Simon, L. S., & Crawford, E. R. (2013). Hierarchical representations of the Five-Factor Model of personality in predicting job performance: Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 875–925.Google Scholar

Kaplan, S., Bradley, J. C., Luschman, J. N., & Haynes, D. (2010). On the role of positive and negative affectivity in job performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 162–176.CrossRef Google Scholar

Moscoso, S., & Salgado, J. F. (2004). “Dark side” personality styles as predictors of task, contextual, and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 356–362.Google Scholar

Moscoso, S., Salgado, J. F., & Anderson, N. R. (2017). How do I get a job? What are they looking for? Personnel selection and assessment. In Chmiel, N., Fraccaroli, F. & Sverke, M. (Eds.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology (3rd ed. pp 25–47). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Myers, I., & Briggs, K. C. (1962). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, E. H. Jr., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 557–579.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S. (1993). The construct of integrity tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., & Anderson, N. (2002). Gender and ethnic group differences on personality scales in selection: Some British data. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 255–276.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2001). Integrity tests and other criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 31–39.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2003). Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for personality scales: Implications for range restriction correction in validation research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 570–577.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F.L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology (Monograph), 78, 679–703.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (2003). Personality and absenteeism: A meta-analysis of integrity tests. European Journal of Personality, 17, 19–38.Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K.M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.Google Scholar

Rolland, J.-P., & De Fruyt, F. (2003). The validity of FFM personality dimensions and maladaptive traits to predict negative affects at work: A 6 months prospective study in a military sample. European Journal of Personality, 17, 101–121.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosenthal, S. A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 617–633.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., Berry, C. M., Wiemann, S. A., & Laczo, R. M. (2006). Citizenship and counterproductive work behavior: Clarifying relationships between the two domains. Human Performance, 19, 441–464.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., Burris, L. R., & Callaham, C. (1989). Integrity testing for personnel selection: an update. Personnel Psychology, 42, 491–529.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., & DeVore, C. J. (2001). Counterproductive behavior at work. In Anderson, N., Ones, D. S., Sinangil, H. & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 144–164). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F. (1997). The Five-Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30–43.Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117–125.Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F. (2003). Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 323–346.CrossRef Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F. (2004). Moderator effects of job complexity on the big five validity. Poster presented at the Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F. (2017a). Moderator effects of job complexity on the validity of forced-choice personality inventories for predicting job performance. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 33, 229–238.CrossRef Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F. (2017b). Using ability tests in selection. In Goldstein, H. W., Pulakos, E. D., Passmore, J. & Semedo, C. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of recruitment, selection and employee retention (pp. 113–150). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., & Tauriz, G. (2015). The validity of ipsative and quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventories for different occupational groups: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 797–834.CrossRef Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F., & De Fruyt, F. (2005). Personality in personnel selection. In Evers, A., Anderson, N. & Voskuijl, O. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of personnel selection (pp. 174–98). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F., & Lado, M. (2018). Faking resistance of a quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventory without algebraic dependence. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34, 213–216.Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Berges, A. (2013). Conscientiousness, its facets, and the prediction of job performance ratings: Evidence against the narrow measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 74–84.CrossRef Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., Sanchez, J. I., Alonso, P., Choragwicka, B., & Berges, A. (2015). Validity of the Five-Factor Model and their facets: The impact of performance measure and facet residualization on the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 325–349.CrossRef Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F., & Tauriz, G. (2014). The Five-Factor Model, forced-choice personality inventories and performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis of academic and occupational validity studies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 3–30.Google Scholar

Schmitt, N., & Kim, B. (2007). Selection decision making. In Boxall, P., Purcell, J. & Wright, P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of human resource management (pp. 300–323). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161.Google Scholar

Swider, B. W., Zimmerman, R. D. (2010). Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 487–506.Google Scholar

Thoresen, C. J., Kaplan, S. A., Barsky, A. P., Warren, C. R., & de Chermont, K. (2003). The affective underpinning of job perceptions and attitudes: A meta-analytic review and integration. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 914–945.Google Scholar

Van Iddekinge, C. H., Roth, P. L., Raymark, P. H., & Odle-Dusseau, H. N. (2012). The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 499–530.Google Scholar

Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2016). Integrity tests: A review of alternate conceptualizations and some measurement and practical issues. In Kumar, U. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of personality assessment (pp. 58–75). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1998). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.Google Scholar

Woods, S., & Anderson, N. R. (2016). Towards a periodic table of personality: Mapping personality scales between the Five-Factor Model and the circumplex model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 582–604.CrossRef Google Scholar

Woods, S., Mustafa, M. J., Anderson, N., & Sayer, B. (2018). Innovative work behavior and personality traits: Examining the moderating effects of organizational tenure. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33, 29–42.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, R. (2008). Understanding the impact of personality traits on individuals’ turnover decisions: A meta-analytic path model. Personnel Psychology, 61, 309–348.Google Scholar

References

Abram, S. V., & DeYoung, C. G. (2017). Using personality neuroscience to study personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8, 2–13.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., & Beier, M. E. (2003). Trait complexes, cognitive investment, and domain knowledge. In Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.), Perspectives on the psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (pp. 1–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.Google Scholar

Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 217–237.Google Scholar

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.Google Scholar

Anderman, E. M., & Wolters, C. A. (2006). Goals, values, and affect: Influences on student motivation. In Alexander, P. A. & Winne, P. H. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 369–389). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bagby, R. M., Gralnick, T. M., Al-Dajani, N., & Uliaszek, A. A. (2016). The role of the Five-Factor Model in personality assessment and treatment planning. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23, 365–381.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar

Barrett, L. F. (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Battle, E. S. (1965). Motivational determinants of academic task persistence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 209–218.Google Scholar

Ben-Eliyahu, A. (2017). Individual differences and learning contexts: A self-regulated learning perspective. In Michalsky, T. & Schechter, C. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: Conceptualization, contribution, and empirically based models for teaching and learning. National Society for the Studies of Education Yearbook (Vol. 119, no. 13, pp. 1–20). New York: Teachers College Record.Google Scholar

Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Bernacki, M. L. (2015). Addressing complexities in self-regulated learning: A focus on contextual factors, contingencies, and dynamic relations. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 1–13.Google Scholar

Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2013). Extending self-regulated learning to include self-regulated emotion strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 558–573.Google Scholar

Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2015). Integrating the regulation of affect, behavior, and cognition into self-regulated learning paradigms among secondary and post-secondary students. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 15–42.Google Scholar

Ben-Eliyahu, A., Moore, D., Dorph, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2018) Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 87–105.Google Scholar

Ben-Eliyahu, A. (2019). Academic emotional learning: A critical component of self-regulated learning in the emotional learning cycle. Educational Psychologist, 54, 84–105.Google Scholar

Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2000). The subtlety of emotions. New York: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bidjerano, T., & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the Big-Five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 69–81.Google Scholar

Boekaerts, M. (2011). Emotions, emotion regulation, and self-regulation of learning. In Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H.. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 408–425). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 417–450). San-Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American psychologist, 32, 513–531.Google Scholar

Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1057–1068.CrossRef Google Scholar

Butler, D. L. (1998). A strategic content learning approach to promoting self-regulated learning. In Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.), Developing self-regulated learning: from teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 160–183). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wlhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Erickson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion, 3, 48–67.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality predicts academic achievement: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 319–338.Google Scholar

Compas, B. E., Jaser, S. S., Bettis, A. H., Watson, K. H., Gruhn, M. A., Dunbar, J. P., Williams, E., & Thigpen, J. C. (2017). Coping, emotion regulation, and psychopathology in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 939–991.Google Scholar

Conley, A. M. (2012). Patterns of motivation beliefs: Combining achievement goal and expectancy-value perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 32–47.Google Scholar

Corno, L. (1986). The metacognitive control components of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 333–346.Google Scholar

Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88–108.Google Scholar

Corr, P. J., & McNaughton, N. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. In Corr, P. J. (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitive theory of personality (pp. 15–187). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

Cucina, J. M., & Vasilopoulos, N. L. (2005). Nonlinear personality–performance relationships and the spurious moderating effects of traitedness. Journal of Personality, 73, 227–260.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cury, F., Elliot, A., Sarrazin, P., Da Fonseca, D., & Rufo, M. (2002). The trichotomous achievement goal model and intrinsic motivation: A sequential mediational analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 473–481.Google Scholar

De Raad, B., & Schouwenburg, H. C. (1996). Personality traits in learning and education. European Journal of Personality, 10, 185–200.Google Scholar

Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2000). Procrastinators lack a broad action perspective. European Journal of Personality, 14, 121–140.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRef Google Scholar

Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2009). The development of personality across the lifespan. In Corr, P. J. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 191–204). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dweck, C. S. (2017). The journey to children’s mindsets and beyond. Child Development Perspectives, 11, 139–144.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.Google Scholar

Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: Free man.Google Scholar

Eccles, J. S. (1984). Sex differences in mathematics participation. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 2, 93–137.Google Scholar

Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Eccles, J. S., Adler, T., & Meece, J. L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 26–43.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.Google Scholar

Entwistle, N. J., & Entwistle, D. (1970). The relationship between personality, study methods and academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 132–143.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Personality and education: The influence of Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 6, 133–144.Google Scholar

Farsides, T., & Woodfield, R. (2003). Individual differences and undergraduate academic success: The roles of personality, intelligence, and application. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1225–1243.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fleischhauer, M., Enge, S., Brocke, B., Ullrich, J., Strobel, A., & Strobel, A. (2010). Predicting school achievement in boys and girls. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 82–96.Google Scholar

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362.Google Scholar

Hair, E. C., & Graziano, W. G. (2003). Self-esteem, personality and achievement in high-school: A prospective longitudinal study in Texas. Journal of Personality, 71, 971–994.Google Scholar

Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Carter, S. M., Lehto, A. T., & Elliot, A. J. (1997). Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1284–1295.Google Scholar

Heaven, P., Mak, A., Barry, J., & Ciarrochi, J. (2002). Personality and family influences on adolescent attitudes to school and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 453–462.Google Scholar

Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47–77.Google Scholar

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.Google Scholar

Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In Dai, D. Y. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89–115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449.Google Scholar

John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2004). Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: Personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. Journal of Personality, 72, 1301–1334.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits – self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability – with job satisfaction and job performance: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797–807.Google Scholar

Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A self-regulatory skills perspective to reducing cognitive interference. In Sarason, I. G., Pierce, G. R. & Sarason, B. R. (Eds.), Cognitive interference: Theories, methods, and findings (pp. 153–171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kanfer, R., Wolf, M. B., Kantrowitz, T. M., & Ackerman, P. L. (2010). Ability and trait complex predictors of academic and job performance: A person-situation approach. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59, 40–69.Google Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248–258.Google Scholar

Kwon, K., Hanrahan, A. R., & Kupzyk, K. A. (2017). Emotional expressivity and emotion regulation: Relation to academic functioning among elementary school children. School Psychology Quarterly, 32, 75–88.Google Scholar

Leith, G. O. M., & Davis, T. N. (1972). Age changes in the relationship between neuroticism and achievement. Research in Education, 8, 61–70.Google Scholar

Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512.CrossRef Google Scholar

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Wormington, S. V., Snyder, K. E., Riggsbee, J., Perez, T., Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Hill, N. E. (2018). Multiple pathways to success: An examination of integrative motivational profiles among upper elementary and college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 1026–1048.Google Scholar

Mace, F. C., Belfiore, P. J., & Shea, M. C. (1989). Operant theory and research on self-regulation. In Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 27–50). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Magnusson, D. (2003). The person approach: Concepts, measurement models, and research strategy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 101, 3–23.Google Scholar

Marchand, G. C., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2016). Processes involving perceived instructional support, task value, and engagement in graduate education. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85, 87–106.Google Scholar

Martin, J. H., Montgomery, R. L., & Saphian, D. (2006). Personality, achievement test scores, and high school percentile as predictors of academic performance across four years of coursework. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 424–431.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Personality traits (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Schwean, V. L., Campbell, S. E., Saklofske, D. H., & Mohamed, A. A. (2000). In Boekarts, M., Pintrich, P. R & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Personality, self-regulation, and adaptation: A cognitive-social framework. Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 171–207). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. (2006). Models of personality and affect for education: A review and synthesis. In Alexander, P. A. & Winne, P. H. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 163–186). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol 1: Personality theories and models (pp. 273–294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

McKenzie, J., & Tindell, G. (1993). Anxiety and academic achievement: Further Furneaux factor findings. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 609–617.Google Scholar

McNaughton, N., DeYoung, C. G., & Corr, P. J. (2016). Approach and avoidance. In Absher, J. R. & Cloutier, J. T. (Eds.), Neuroimaging personality and character: Traits and mental states in the brain (pp. 25–49). London: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424–436.Google Scholar

Mõttus, R., Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., Riemann, R., & McCrae, R. R. (2017). Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 474–490.Google Scholar

Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1991). A comparison of training programs intended for different types of test-anxious students: Further support for an information-processing model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 134–139.Google Scholar

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Morrow, J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1993). Response styles and the duration of episodes of depressed mood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 20–28.Google Scholar

O’Connor, M. C., & Paunonen, S. V. (2007). Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 971–990.Google Scholar

Owens, M., Stevenson, J., Hadwin, J. A., & Norgate, R. (2014). When does anxiety help or hinder cognitive test performance? The role of working memory capacity. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 92–101.Google Scholar

Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.Google Scholar

Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135.Google Scholar

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555.Google Scholar

Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. (1990, April). Quantitative and qualitative perspectives on student motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA (Vol. 128).Google Scholar

Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.Google Scholar

Pritchard, M. E., & Wilson, G. S. (2003). Using emotional and social factors to predict student success. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 18–28.Google Scholar

Renninger, K., & Wozniak, R. H. (1985). Effect of interest on attentional shift, recognition, and recall in young children. Developmental Psychology, 21, 624–632.Google Scholar

Richards, J. M., & Gross, J. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 410–424.Google Scholar

Richardson, M., & Abraham, C. (2009). Conscientiousness and achievement motivation predict performance. European Journal of Personality, 23, 589–605.Google Scholar

Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387.Google Scholar

Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le- Huy, D. D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261–288.Google Scholar

Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents’ psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 408–422.Google Scholar

Roth, G., & Assor, A. (2012). The costs of parental pressure to express emotions: Conditional regard and autonomy support as predictors of emotion regulation and intimacy. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 799–808.Google Scholar

Ruban, L., McCoach, D. B., & Reis, S. M. (2002). Gender invariance in the impacts of pre-college scholastic factors and self-regulated learning variables on the academic attainment of undergraduate students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, April 1–5, 2002).Google Scholar

Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). “I don’t feel like it”: The function of interest in self-regulation. In Martin, L. L. & Tesser, A. (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation (pp. 203–228). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10, 175–186.Google Scholar

Schiefele, U. (2001). The role of interest in motivation and learning. In Messick, S. & Collis, J. M. (Eds.), Intelligence and personality (pp. 163–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Schouwenburg, H. C., & Lay, C. H. (1995). Trait procrastination and the big-five factors of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 481–490.Google Scholar

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.) (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational implications. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Schutz, P. A., & Pekrun, R. E. (2007). Emotion in education. Elsevier.Google Scholar

Seipp, B. (1991). Anxiety and academic performance: A meta-analysis of findings. Anxiety Research, 4, 27–41.Google Scholar

Shiner, R. L., Masten, A. S., & Roberts, J. M. (2003). Childhood personality foreshadows adult personality and life outcomes two decades later. Journal of Personality, 71, 1145–1170.Google Scholar

Shirey, L. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (1988). Effect of interest on attention and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 159–166.Google Scholar

Uliaszek, A. A., Al-Dajani, N., & Bagby, R. M. (2015). The relationship between psychopathology and a hierarchical model of normal personality traits: Evidence from a psychiatric patient sample. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 719–734.Google Scholar

Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., & Vermunt, J. D. (2001). The role of personality traits and goal orientations in strategy use. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 149–170.Google Scholar

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.Google Scholar

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265–310.Google Scholar

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–Value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.Google Scholar

Willingham, W. W., Pollack, J. M., & Lewis, C. (2002). Grades and test scores: Accounting for observed differences. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 1–37.Google Scholar

Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, 93, 27–30.Google Scholar

Zachar, P., & First, M. B. (2015). Transitioning to a dimensional model of personality disorder in DSM 5.1 and beyond. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 28, 66–72.Google Scholar

Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2005). Evaluation anxiety. In Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 141–163). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 397–417.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J., Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2015). A personal agency view of self-regulated learning. In Guay, F., Marsh, H., Mclnerney, D. M. & Craven, R. G. (Eds.), Self-concept, motivation and identity: Underpinning success with research and practice (pp. 83–114). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, M. (2005). Psychobiology of personality (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Allik, J., & Realo, A. (2017). Universal and specific in the five factor model. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model (pp. 173–190). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev. ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2001). Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar

Andersen, A. M., & Bienvenu, O. J. (2011). Personality and psychopathology. International Review of Psychiatry, 23, 234–247.Google Scholar

Armstrong, L., & Rimes, K. A. (2016). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for neuroticism (stress vulnerability): A pilot randomized study. Behavior Therapy, 47, 287–298.Google Scholar

Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132–145.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bagby, R. M., Uliaszek, A. A., Gralnick, T. M., & Al-Dajani, N. (2017). Axis I disorders. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model (pp. 479–506). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barlow, D. H., Ellard, K. K., Fairholme, C., Farchione, T. J., Boisseau, C., Allen, L., & Ehrenreich-May, J. (2011). Unified protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barlow, D. H., Sauer-Zavala, S., Carl, J. R., Bullis, J. R., & Ellard, K. K. (2014). The nature, diagnosis, and treatment of neuroticism. Back to the future. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 344–365.Google Scholar

Bateman, A. W., & Fonagy, P. (2012). Mentalization-based treatment of borderline personality disorder. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 767–784). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blashfield, R. K., & Intoccia, V. (2000). Growth of the literature on the topic of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 472–473.Google Scholar

Bornstein, R. F. (2005). The dependent patient. A practitioner’s guide. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Bornstein, R. F. (2012). Dependent personality disorder. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 505–526). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, W. K., Hoffman, B. J., Campbell, S. M., & Marchisio, G. (2011). Narcissism in organizational contexts. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 268–284.Google Scholar

Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2013). Narcissistic personality disorder and the Five-Factor Model: Delineating narcissistic personality disorder, grandiose narcissism, and vulnerable narcissism. In Widiger, T. A. & Costa, P. T. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model (3rd ed., pp. 133–146). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Campbell, W. K., Rudich, E., & Sedikides, C. (2002). Narcissism, self-esteem, and the positivity of self-views: Two portraits of self-love. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 358–368.Google Scholar

Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.Google Scholar

Cassin, S. E., & von-Ranson, K. M. (2005). Personality and eating disorders: A decade in review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 895–916.Google Scholar

Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 277–257.Google Scholar

Cloninger, C. R. (2000). A practical way to diagnose personality disorder: A proposal. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 98–108.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. (2017). The NEO inventories as instruments of psychological theory. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor model (pp. 11–37). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crego, C., Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2015). The FFOCI and other measures and models of OCPD. Assessment, 22, 135–151.Google Scholar

Crego, C., & Widiger, T. A. (2015). Psychopathy and the DSM. Journal of Personality, 83, 665–677.Google Scholar

Crego, C., & Widiger, T. A. (2017). The conceptualization and assessment of schizotypal traits: A comparison of the FFSI and PID-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 31, 606–623.Google Scholar

Cuijpers, P., Smit, F., Penninx, B. W. J. H., de Graaf, R., ten Have, M., & Beekman, A. T. F. (2010). Economic costs of neuroticism: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 1086–1093.Google Scholar

Danner, D. D., Snowden, D. A., & Friesen, W. V. (2001). Positive emotions in early life and longevity: Findings from the Nun Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 804–813.Google Scholar

De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., Van Leeuwen, K., & Mervielde, I. (2006). The structure of maladaptive personality traits in childhood: A step toward an integrative developmental perspective for DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 639–657.Google Scholar

De Fruyt, F., De Clerq, B., De Bolle, M., Willie, B., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assessment, 20, 295–307.Google Scholar

Derefinko, K., & Lynam, D. R. (2013). Psychopathy from the perspective of the five-factor model. In Widiger, T. A. & Costa, P. T. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality (3rd ed., pp. 103–118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

DeShong, H. L., Lengel, G. J., Sauer-Zavala, S. E., O’Meara, M., & Mullins-Sweatt, S. N. (2015). Construct validity of the Five-Factor Borderline Inventory. Assessment, 22, 319–331.Google Scholar

Edmundson, M., & Kwapil, T. R. (2013). A Five-Factor Model perspective of schizotypal personality disorder. In Widiger, T. A. & Costa, P. T. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model (3rd ed., pp. 147–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

First, M. B., Reed, G. M., Hyman, S. E., & Saxena, S. (2015). The development of the ICD‐11 clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines for mental and behavioural disorders. World Psychiatry, 14, 82–90.Google Scholar

Friedman, H. S., Tucker, J., Tomlinson-Keasey, C., Schwartz, J., Wingard, D., & Criqui, M. H. (1993). Does childhood personality predict longevity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 176–185.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.Google Scholar

Gore, W. L., & Pincus, A. L. (2013). Dependency and the five-factor model. In Widiger, T. A. & Costa, P. T. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model (3rd ed., pp. 163–178). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Gore, W. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 816–821.Google Scholar

Gore, W. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2016). Fluctuation between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7, 363–371.Google Scholar

Hakulinen, C., Elovainio, M., Pulkki-Raback, L., Virtanen, M., Kivimaki, M., & Jokela, M. (2015). Personality and depressive symptoms: Individual participant meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies. Depression and Anxiety, 32, 461–470.Google Scholar

Hammen, C. (2005). Stress and depression. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 293–319.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D. (1993). Without conscience. The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–246.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D., Neumann, C. S., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). Psychopathy. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality disorder (pp. 478–504). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heller, D., Watson, D., & Ilies, R. (2004). The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 574–600.Google Scholar

Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality Research Form manual (3rd ed.). Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.Google Scholar

Jackson, J. J., & Roberts, B. W. (2017). Conscientiousness. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model (pp. 133–147). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jarnecke, A. M., & South, S. C. (2017). Behavior and molecular genetics of the five-factor model. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 301–318). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jeronimus, B. F., Kotov, R., Riese, H., & Ormel, J. (2016). Neuroticism’s prospective association with mental disorders halves after adjustment for baseline symptoms and psychiatric history, but the adjusted association hardly decays with time: A meta-analysis on 59 longitudinal/prospective studies with 443 313 participants. Psychological Medicine, 46, 2883–2906.Google Scholar

Johansen, M., Karterud, S., Pedersen, G., Gude, T., & Falkum, E. (2004). An investigation of the prototype validity of the borderline DSM‐IV construct. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 109, 289–298.Google Scholar

John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In John, O. P., Robins, R. R. & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G. (1923). Psychological types. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kern, M. L., & Friedman, H. S. (2017). Health psychology. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model (pp. 403–422). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Klein, D. N., Kotov, R., & Bufferd, S. J. (2011). Personality and depression: Explanatory models and review of the evidence. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 269–295.Google Scholar

Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 768–821.Google Scholar

Kwapil, T. R., & Barrantes-Vidal, N. (2012). Schizotypal personality disorder: An integrative review. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 437–476). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64, 241–256.Google Scholar

Lengel, G. J., Helle, A. C., DeShong, H. L., Meyer, N. A., & Mullins‐Sweatt, S. N. (2016). Translational applications of personality science for the conceptualization and treatment of psychopathology. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23, 288–308.Google Scholar

Lenzenweger, M. F. (2006). Schizotypy: An organizing framework for schizophrenia research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 162–166.Google Scholar

Lilienfeld, S. O., Waldman, I. D., Landfield, K., Watts, A. L., Rubenzer, S., & Faushingbauer, T. R. (2012). Fearless dominance and the U.S. presidency: Implications of psychopathic personality traits for successful and unsuccessful political leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 489–505.Google Scholar

Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. R. (2005). Psychopathic Personality Inventory: Revised professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar

Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Livesley, W. J. (Ed.) (2001). Handbook of personality disorders. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Livesley, W. J. (2007). A framework for integrating dimensional and categorical classifications of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 199–224.Google Scholar

Luyten, P., & Blatt, S. J. (2013). Interpersonal relatedness and self-definition in normal and disrupted personality development: retrospect and prospect. American Psychologist, 68, 172–183.Google Scholar

Lynam, D. R., Gaughan, E., Miller, J. D., Miller, D., Mullins-Sweat, S., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23, 108–124.Google Scholar

Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the Five-Factor Model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 401–412.Google Scholar

Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2007). Using a general model of personality to understand sex differences in the personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 583–602.Google Scholar

Lynch, T. R., Trost, W. T., Salsman, N., & Linehan, M. M. (2007). Dialectical behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 181–205.Google Scholar

Magidson, J. F., Roberts, B. W., Collado-Rodriguez, A., & Lejuez, C. W. (2014). Theory-driven intervention for changing personality: Expectancy value theory, behavioral activation, and conscientiousness. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1442–1450.Google Scholar

Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Rooke, S. E., & Schutte, N. S. (2007). Alcohol involvement and the Five-Factor Model of personality: A meta-analysis. Journal of Drug Education, 37, 277–294.Google Scholar

Malouff, J. M. Thorsteinsson, E. B., & Schutte, N. S. (2005). The relationship between the Five-Factor Model of personality and symptoms of clinical disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27, 101–114.Google Scholar

Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., & Schutte, N. S. (2006). The Five-Factor Model of personality and smoking: A meta-analysis. Journal of Drug Education, 36, 47–58.Google Scholar

Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The Five-Factor Model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 124–127.Google Scholar

Martinez, M. A., Zeichner, A., Reidy, D. E., & Miller, J. D. (2008). Narcissism and displaced aggression: Effects of positive, negative, and delayed feedback. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 140–149.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood. A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Mervielde, I., De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., & Van Leeuwen, K. (2005). Temperament, personality, and developmental psychopathology as childhood antecedents of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 171–201.Google Scholar

Mervielde, I., & De Fruyt, F. (2002). Assessing children’s traits with the Hierarchical Personality I Inventory for Children. In de Raad, B. & Perugini, M. (Eds.), Big Five assessment (pp. 129–146). Bern, Switzerland: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar

Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., … Reid, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 56, 128–165.Google Scholar

Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2012). An examination of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory’s nomological network: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 1305–1326.Google Scholar

Miller, J. D., Widiger, T. A., & Campbell, W. K. (2010). Narcissistic personality disorder and the DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 640–649.Google Scholar

Millon, T. (1994). Manual for the MCMI-III. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar

Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. London: Wiley.Google Scholar

Mulder, R. T., Horwood, J., Tyrer, P., Carter, J, & Joyce, P. R. (2016). Validating the proposed ICD-11 domains. Personality and Mental Health, 10, 84–95.Google Scholar

Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Bernstein, D. P., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). Retention or deletion of personality disorder diagnoses for DSM-5: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 689–703.Google Scholar

Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Edmundson, M., Sauer-Zavala, S., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). Five-factor measure of borderline personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 475–487.Google Scholar

Mullins‐Sweatt, S. N., & Lengel, G. J. (2012). Clinical utility of the Five‐Factor Model of personality disorder. Journal of Personality, 80, 1615–1639.Google Scholar

Munafo, M. R., Zetteler, J. I., & Clark, T. G. (2007). Personality and smoking status: A meta-analysis. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 9, 405–413.Google Scholar

O’Connor, B. P. (2002). A quantitative review of the comprehensiveness of the Five-Factor Model in relation to popular personality inventories. Assessment, 9, 188–203.Google Scholar

O’Connor, B. P. (2005). A search for consensus on the dimensional structure of personality disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 323–345.Google Scholar

Oldham, J., Skodol, A., & Bender, D. (Eds.) (2005). Textbook of personality disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar

Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). Assessment of fluctuation between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Development and initial validation of the FLUX scales. Psychological Assessment, 30, 1612–1624.Google Scholar

Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: The Personality Inventory for ICD-11. Psychological Assessment, 30, 154–169.Google Scholar

Oltmanns, T. F., & Powers, A. D. (2012). Gender and personality disorders. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 206–218). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.Google Scholar

Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938.Google Scholar

Pileggi, N. (1985). Wiseguy. New York: Simon Shuster Pocket Books.Google Scholar

Pincus, A. L., & Lukowitsky, M. R. (2010). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 421–446.Google Scholar

Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the Five-Factor Model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.Google Scholar

Raine, A. (2006). Schizotypal personality: Neurodevelopmental and psychosocial trajectories. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 291–326.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., Hill, P. L., & Davis, J. P. (2017). How to change conscientiousness: The sociogenomic trait intervention model. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8, 199–205.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.Google Scholar

Ronningstam, E. (2005). Narcissistic personality disorder: a review. In Maj, M., Akiskal, H. S., Mezzich, J. E. & Okasha, A. (Eds.), Personality disorders (pp. 278–327). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R. (1990). How are we doing in soft psychology? American Psychologist, 45, 775–777.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., & Walmsley, P. T. (2014). Which personality attributes are most important in the workplace? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 538–551.Google Scholar

Samuel, D. B., Riddell, A. D. B., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). A five-factor measure of obsessive-compulsive personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 456–465.Google Scholar

Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the Five-Factor Model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342.Google Scholar

Sauer-Zavala, S., Wilner, J. G., & Barlow, D. H. (2017). Addressing neuroticism in psychological treatment. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8, 191–198.Google Scholar

Skodol, A. E. (2012). Personality disorders in DSM-5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 317–344.Google Scholar

Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., & Gibbon, M. (1979). Crossing the border into borderline personality and borderline schizophrenia: The development of criteria. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 17–24.Google Scholar

Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., & Skodol, A. E. (1980). DSM-III: The major achievements and an overview. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 151–164.Google Scholar

Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161.Google Scholar

Tackett, J. L., & Lahey, B. (2017). Neuroticism. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model (pp. 39–56). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tackett, J. L., & Mullins-Sweatt, S. (in press). Personality and psychopathology. In John, O. P. & Robins, R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, K. M., Yalch, M. M., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G. C., Markon, K. E., & Hopwood, C. J. (2012). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and Five-Factor Model trait domains. Assessment, 12, 308–311.Google Scholar

Trull, T. J., & Brown, W. C. (2013). Borderline personality disorder: A five-factor model perspective. In Widiger, T. A. & Costa, P. T. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model (3rd ed., pp. 118–132). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Trull, T. J., & Durrett, C. A. (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 355–380.Google Scholar

Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2003). “Isn’t it fun to get the respect that we’re going to deserve?” Narcissism, social rejection, and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 261–272.Google Scholar

Tyrer, P. (2009). Why borderline personality disorder is neither borderline nor a personality disorder. Personality and Mental Health, 3, 86–95.Google Scholar

Tyrer, P. (2014). Time to choose – DSM-5, ICD-11, or both? Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 3, 5–8.Google Scholar

Tyrer, P., Mulder, R., Kim, Y-R., & Crawford, M. J. (2019). The development of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: An amalgam of science, pragmatism and politics. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 481–502.Google Scholar

Verheul, R., & Widiger, T. A. (2004). A meta-analysis of the prevalence and usage of the personality disorder not otherwise specified (PDNOS) diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 309–319.Google Scholar

Watson, D., Ellickson‐Larew, S., Stanton, K., & Levin‐Aspenson, H. (2016). Personality provides a general structural framework for psychopathology: Commentary on “Translational applications of personality science for the conceptualization and treatment of psychopathology.” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23, 309–313.Google Scholar

Watson, D., & Naragon-Gainey, K. (2014). Personality, emotions, and the emotional disorders. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 422–442.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A. (2009a). In defense of borderline personality disorder. Personality and Mental Health, 3, 120–123.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A. (2009b). Neuroticism. In Leary, M. R. & Hoyle, R. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 129–146). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A. (2011). A shaky future for personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 54–67.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A. (Ed.) (2012). Oxford handbook of personality disorder. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., & Costa, P. T. (1994). Personality and personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 78–91.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., Frances, A., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (1988). The DSM-III-R personality disorders: An overview. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 786–795.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., Gore, W. L., Crego, C., Rojas, S. L., & Oltmanns, J. R. (2017). Five- Factor Model and personality disorder. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model (pp. 449–478). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2012). Measures to assess maladaptive variants of the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 450–455.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., & Oltmanns, J. R. (2017). Neuroticism is a fundamental domain of personality with enormous public health implications. World Psychiatry, 16, 144–145.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., & Presnall, J. R. (2013). Clinical application of the Five‐Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 81, 515–527.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., Sellbom, M., Chmielewski, M., Clark, L. A., DeYoung, C. G., Kotov, R., Krueger, , … & Wright, A. G. C. (2019). Personality in a hierarchical model of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 77–92.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., Simonsen, E., Krueger, R., Livesley, J., & Verheul, R. (2005). Personality disorder research agenda for the DSM-V. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 317–340.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., & Smith, G. T. (2008). Personality and psychopathology. In John, O. P., Robins, R. & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.) Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 743–769) New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71–83.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Google Scholar

Wright, A. G. C., & Simms, L J. (2014). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analysis of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO PI-3 trait models. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 43–54.Google Scholar

References

Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47−88.Google Scholar

Agnew, R., Brezina, T., Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40, 43−72.Google Scholar

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.Google Scholar

Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 887–919.Google Scholar

Bresin, K., & Robinson, M. D. (2015) You are what you see and choose: Agreeableness and situation selection. Journal of Personality, 83, 452–463.Google Scholar

Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Silva, P. A., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Krueger, R. F., & Schmutte, P. S. (1994). Are some people crime-prone? Replications of the personality-crime relationship across countries, genders, races, and methods. Criminology, 32, 163−195.Google Scholar

Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.Google Scholar

Church, T. A. (2001). Personality measurement in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Personality, 69, 979–1006.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853–863.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PIR) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEOFFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: PAR.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995a). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEP Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21–50.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995b). Primary traits of Eysenck’s P-E-N model: Three- and five-factor solutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 308–317.Google Scholar

Crowe, M. L., Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2018). Uncovering the structure of agreeableness from self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 86, 771–787.Google Scholar

DeLisi, M. (2009). Psychopathy is the unified theory of crime. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7, 256–273.Google Scholar

DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.Google Scholar

DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7, 177–188.Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896.Google Scholar

Digman, J. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.Google Scholar

Eysenck, S. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1970). Crime and personality: An empirical study of the three-factor theory. British Journal of Criminology, 10, 225–239.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D. (1999). Psychopathy as a risk factor for violence. Psychiatric Quarterly, 70, 181–197.Google Scholar

Hemphill, J. F., Templeman, R., Wong, S., & Hare, R. D. (1998). Psychopathy and crime: Recidivism and criminal careers. In Cooke, D. J., Forth, A. E. & Hare, R. D. (Eds.), Psychopathy: Theory, research, and implications for society: NATO ASI Series D: Behavioral and Social Sciences (Vol. 88, pp. 375–399). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Hirschi, T. (2004). Self-control and crime. In Baumeister, R. F. & Vohs, K. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and application (pp. 537–552). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hoyle, R. H., Fejfar, M. C., & Miller, J. D. (2000). Personality and sexual risk taking: A quantitative review. Journal of Personality, 68, 1203–1231.Google Scholar

Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., & Vernon, P. A. (1996). Heritability of the Big Five personality dimensions and their facets: A twin study. Journal of Personality, 64, 577−591.Google Scholar

John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W. & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality (pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Jones, S., & Lynam, D. R. (2009). In the eye of the impulsive beholder: The interaction of impulsivity and perceived informal social control on offending. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 307−321.Google Scholar

Jones, S. E., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2011). Personality, antisocial behavior, and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 329–337.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–778.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541.Google Scholar

Kotov, R., Ruggero, C. J., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Yuan, Q., & Zimmerman, M. (2011). New dimensions in the quantitative classification of mental illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 1003–1011.Google Scholar

Lilienfeld, S. O., Watts, A. L., Smith, S. F., Berg, J. M., & Latzman, R. D. (2015). Psychopathy deconstructed and reconstructed: Identifying and assembling the personality building blocks of Cleckley’s chimera. Journal of Personality, 83, 593–610.Google Scholar

Loeber, R. (1982). The stability of antisocial and delinquent child behavior: A review. Child Development, 53, 1431−1446.Google Scholar

Lynam, D. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Wikström, P. -O. H., Loeber, R., & Novak, S. (2000). The interaction between impulsivity and neighborhood context on offending: The effects of impulsivity are stronger in poorer neighborhoods. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 563−574.Google Scholar

Lynam, D., Gaughan, E., Miller, J., Miller, D., Mullins-Sweatt, S., & Widiger, T. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23, 108–124.Google Scholar

Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2015). Psychopathy from a basic trait perspective: The utility of a Five-Factor Model approach. Journal of Personality, 83, 611–626.Google Scholar

Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., & Schutte, N. S. (2005). The relationship between the Five-Factor Model of personality and symptoms of clinical disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27, 101–114.Google Scholar

Maples, J. L., Guan, L., Carter, N. T., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the Five-Factor Model. Psychological Assessment, 26, 1070–1084.Google Scholar

Marshall, W. L., Smallbone, S., & Marshall, L. E. (2014). A critique of current child molester subcategories: A proposal for an alternative approach. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 205–218.Google Scholar

Mason, D. A., & Frick, P. J. (1994). The heritability of antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16, 301−323.Google Scholar

Matsueda, R. L., & Anderson, K. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology, 36, 269−308.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2013). Introduction to the empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In Widiger, T. A. & Costa, P. T. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality (3rd ed., pp. 15–27). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., Martin, T. A., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2005). Age trends and age norms for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 in adolescents and adults. Assessment, 12, 363–373.Google Scholar

Meier, B., Robinson, M., & Wilkowski, B. M. (2006). Turning the other cheek: Agreeableness and the regulation of aggression-related primes. Psychological Science, 17, 136–142.Google Scholar

Meier, B., Robinson, M., & Wilkowski, B. M. (2007). Aggressive primes activate hostile information in memory: Who is most susceptible? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 23–34.Google Scholar

Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Does quick to blame mean quick to anger? The role of agreeableness in dissociating blame and anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 856–867.Google Scholar

Meier, M. H., Slutske, W. S., Arndt, S., & Cadoret, R. J. (2008). Impulsive and callous traits are more strongly associated with delinquent behavior in higher risk neighborhoods among boys and girls. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 377−385.Google Scholar

Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. (2001a). Structural models of personality and their relation to antioscial behavior: A meta-analytic review. Criminology, 4, 765–794.Google Scholar

Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2006). Reactive and proactive aggression: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Difference, 41, 1469–1480.Google Scholar

Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2015). Understanding psychopathy using the basic elements of personality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 223–237.Google Scholar

Miller, J., Lynam, D., Widiger, T., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: Can the Five-Factor Model adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality, 69, 253–276.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2015). A meta-analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and Five-Factor Model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83, 644–664.Google Scholar

Ode, S., Robinson, M. D., & Wilkowski, B. M. (2008). Can one’s temper be cooled? A role for Agreeableness in moderating Neuroticism’s influence on anger and aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 295–311Google Scholar

Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the Five-Factor Model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.Google Scholar

R Development Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.Google Scholar

Reimann, R., Angleitner, A., & Strelau, J. (1997). Genetic and environmental influences on personality: A study of twins reared together using the self-and peer-report NEO-FFI scales. Journal of Personality, 65, 449−475.Google Scholar

Roberts, B.W., & Mroczek, D. (2008). Personality trait change in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 31–35.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., Jackson, J. J., Burger, J., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Conscientiousness and externalizing psychopathology: Overlap, developmental patterns, and etiology of two-related constructs. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 871–888.Google Scholar

Robinson, M. D. (2007). Personality, affective processing, and self-regulation: Toward process-based views of extraversion, neuroticism, and agreeableness. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 223–235.Google Scholar

Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet-level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342.Google Scholar

Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168–182.Google Scholar

Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2012). Development of Big Five domains and facets in adulthood: Mean-level age trends and broadly versus narrowly acting mechanisms. Journal of Personality, 80, 881–914.Google Scholar

Tackett, J., Slobodskaya, H., Mar, R., Deal, J., Halverson, C., Baker, S., Pavlopoulos, V. & Besevegis, E. (2012). The hierarchical structure of childhood personality in five countries: Continuity from early childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Personality, 80, 847–879.Google Scholar

Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety with an emphasis on self-report. In Tuma, A. H. & Maser, J. D. (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681–706). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Tracy, P. E., Wolfgang, M. E., & Figlio, R. M. (1990). Delinquency careers in two birth cohorts. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Vaughn, M. G., & DeLisi, M. (2008). Were Wolfgang’s chronic offenders psychopaths? On the convergent validity between psychopathy and career criminality. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 33–42.Google Scholar

Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the “metaphor” package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48.Google Scholar

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Harkness, A. R. (1994). Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 18–31.Google Scholar

Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., & Lynam, D. R. (1998). Psychopathy and the Five-Factor Model of personality. In Millon, T., Simonsen, E., Birket Smith, M. & Davis, R. D. (Eds.), Psychopathy: Antisocial, criminal, and violent behavior (pp. 171–187). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1992). Personality: Structure and assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 473–504.Google Scholar

Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2007). The cognitive basis of trait anger and reactive aggression: An integrative analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 3–21.Google Scholar

Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Kijima, N., Yoshimura, K., & Jang, K. (2006). Is the genetic structure of human personality universal? A cross-cultural twin study from North America, Europe, and Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 987–998.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, G. M. (2010). Impulsivity, offending, and the neighborhood: Investigating the person-context nexus. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 301−332.Google Scholar

References

Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. D. (2011). Personality psychology and economics. In Hanushek, E., Machin, S. & Woessman, L. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 4, pp. 1–181). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Split-sample instrumental variables estimates of the return to schooling. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13, 225–235.Google Scholar

Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2001). Instrumental variables and the search for identification. From supply and demand to natural experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 69–85.Google Scholar

Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996) Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–455.Google Scholar

Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1086–1120.Google Scholar

Arah, O. A. (2008). The role of causal reasoning in understanding Simpson’s paradox, Lord’s paradox, and the suppression effect: Covariate selection in the analysis of observational studies. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 5, 5.Google Scholar

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.Google Scholar

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139–152.Google Scholar

Barford, K. A., Zhao, K., & Smillie, L. D. (2015). Mapping the interpersonal domain: Translating between the Big Five, HEXACO, and Interpersonal Circumplex. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 232–237.Google Scholar

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.Google Scholar

Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D. (2010). Empathy-induced altruistic motivation. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 15–34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Becker, A., Deckers, T., Dohmen, T., Falk, A., & Kosse, F. (2012). The relationship between economic preferences and psychological personality measures. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 453–478.Google Scholar

Benenson, J. F., Pascoe, J., & Radmore, N. (2007). Children’s altruistic behavior in the dictator game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 168–175.Google Scholar

Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–360.Google Scholar

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122–142.Google Scholar

Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sacket, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 410–424.Google Scholar

Böckler, A., Tusche, A., & Singer, T. (2018). The structure of human prosociality revisited: Corrigendum and addendum to Böckler, Tusche and Singer (2016). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 754–759.Google Scholar

Böckler, A., Tusche, A., & Singer, T. (2016). The structure of human prosociality: Differentiating altruistically motivated, norm motivated, strategically motivated and self-reported prosocial behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 530–541.Google Scholar

Bolton, L. R., Becker, L. K., & Barber, L. K. (2010). Big Five trait predictors of differential counterproductive work behaviour dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 537–541.Google Scholar

Borghans, L., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & ter Weel, B. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, XLIII, 972–1059.Google Scholar

Boyce, C. J., Wood, A. M., & Brown, G. D. A. (2010). The dark side of conscientiousness: Conscientious people experience greater drops in life satisfaction following unemployment. Journal Research in Personality, 44, 535–539.Google Scholar

Boyce, C. J., Wood, A. M., Daly, M., & Sedikides, C. (2015). Personality change following unemployment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 991–1011.Google Scholar

Brandstätter, H. (2011). Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 222–230.Google Scholar

Brocklebank, S., Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2011). Personality accounts for stable preferences and expectations across a range of simple games. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 881–886. DOI.10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.007Google Scholar

Camerer, C. F., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 209–219.Google Scholar

Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.Google Scholar

Cherry, T. L., Frykblom, P., & Shogren, J. F. (2002). Hardnose the dictator. American Economic Review, 92, 1218–1221.Google Scholar

Chi, N. W., Chang, H. T., & Huang, H. L. (2015). Can personality traits and daily positive mood buffer the harmful effects of daily negative mood on task performance and service sabotage? A self-control perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 1–15.Google Scholar

Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). Another perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122.Google Scholar

Conti, G., & Heckman, J. J. (2014). Understanding conscientiousness across the life course: An economic perspective. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1451–1459.Google Scholar

Credé, M., Harms, P., Niehorster, S., & Gaye-Valentine, A. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 874–888.Google Scholar

Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. J. (2008). Formulating, identifying and estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Journal of Human Resources, XLIII, 738–782.Google Scholar

Denissen, J. J. A., Luhmann, M., Chung, J. M., & Bleidorn, W. (2019). Transactions between life events and personality traits across the adult lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 612–633.Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896.Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five Theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.Google Scholar

Didelez, V., & Sheehan, N. (2007). Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference. Statistical Methods and Medical Research, 16, 309–330.Google Scholar

Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16, 181–191.Google Scholar

Egan, M., Daly, M., Delaney, L., Boyce, C. J., & Wood, A. M. (2017). Adolescent conscientiousness predicts lower lifetime unemployment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 700–709.Google Scholar

Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53.Google Scholar

Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14, 583–610.Google Scholar

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004a). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 63–87.Google Scholar

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004b). Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 185–190.Google Scholar

Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90, 980–994.Google Scholar

Fehr, E., & Gachter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140.Google Scholar

Ferguson, E. (2013). Personality is of central concern to understand health: Towards a theoretical model for health psychology. Health Psychology Review, 7, S32–S70.Google Scholar

Ferguson, E. (2015) Mechanisms of altruism approach to blood donor recruitment and retention: A review and future directions. Transfusion Medicine, 25, 211–226.Google Scholar

Ferguson, E., & Flynn, N. (2016). Moral relativism as a disconnect between behavioural and experienced warm glow. Journal of Economic Psychology, 56, 163–175.Google Scholar

Ferguson, E., & Lievens, F. (2017). Future directions in personality, occupational and medical selection: Myths, misunderstandings, measurement, and suggestions. Advances in Health Science Education, 22, 387–399.Google Scholar

Ferguson, E., Heckman, J. J., & Corr, P. (2011). Personality and economics: Overview and proposed framework. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 201–209.Google Scholar

Ferguson, E., James, D., O’Hehir, F., & Sanders, A. (2003). A pilot study of the roles of personality, references and personal statements in relation to performance over the 5 years of a medical degree. British Medical Journal, 326, 429–431.Google Scholar

Ferguson, E., Semper, H., Yates, J., Fitzgerald, J. E., Skatova, A., & James, D. (2014). The ‘Dark Side’ and ‘Bright Side’ of personality: When too much conscientiousness and too little anxiety are detrimental to the acquisition of medical knowledge and skill. PLoS One, 9, e8860.Google Scholar

Ferguson, E., Zhao, K., O’Carroll, R. E., & Smillie, L. D. (2019). Costless and costly pro-sociality: Correspondence among personality traits, economic preferences, and real world pro-sociality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 461–471.Google Scholar

Fleeson, W. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate: The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 83–87.Google Scholar

Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114.Google Scholar

Flood, M. (1958). Some experimental games. Management Science, 5, 5–26.Google Scholar

Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347–369.Google Scholar

Foster, E. M. (2010). Causal inference and developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1454–1480.Google Scholar

Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216.Google Scholar

Greenland, S. (2000). An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists. International Journal of Epidemiology, 29, 722–729.Google Scholar

Gu, R., Jiang, Y., Kiser, S., Black, C. L., Broster, L. S., Luo, Y-J., & Kely, T. H. (2017). Impulsive personality dimensions are associated with altered behavioral performance and neural responses in the monetary incentive delay task. Neuropsychologia, 103, 59–68.Google Scholar

Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367–388.Google Scholar

Hayduk, L., Cummings, G., Stratkotter, R., Nimmo, M., Grygoryev, K., Dosmna, D., Gillespie, M., Pazderka-Robinson, H., & Boadu, K. (2003). Pearl’s D-separation: One more step into causal thinking. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 289–311.Google Scholar

Heckman, J. J. (2007). The economics, technology, and neuroscience of human capability formation. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science, 104, 13250–13255.Google Scholar

Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on sift skills Labour Economics, 19, 451–464.Google Scholar

Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 411–482.Google Scholar

Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 383–403.Google Scholar

Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., Leist, F., & Heydasch, T. (2013). It takes two: Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 598–603.Google Scholar

Howard, D. (2000). The impact of waiting time on liver transplant outcomes. Health Services Research, 35, 1117–1134.Google Scholar

Hubard, J., Harbaugh, W. T., Srivastava, S., Degras, D., & Mayr, U. (2016). A general benevolenve domension tha ytlinks neural, psychological and economic, and life span data on alruitsic tendencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1351–1358.Google Scholar

Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 490–507.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98.Google Scholar

Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869–879.Google Scholar

John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W. & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 3, pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., & Petrini, L. (2011). A new trait on the market: Honesty-humility as a unique predictor of job performance ratings. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 857–862.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., Martocchio, J. J., & Thoresen, C. J. (1997) Five-Factor Model of personality and employee absence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 745–755.Google Scholar

Karten, P., & Moser, K. (2009). Unemployment impairs mental health: Meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behvaior, 74, 264–282.Google Scholar

Laland, K. N., Sterelny, K., Odling-Smee, J., Hoppitt, W., & Uller, T. (2011). Cause and effect in biology revisited: Is Mayr’s proximate-ultimate dichotomy still useful. Science, 334, 1512–1516.Google Scholar

Lawlor, D. A., Harbord, R. M., Sterne, J. A. C., Timpson, N., & Davey-Smith, G. (2008). Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 1133–1163.Google Scholar

Lee, J. J. (2012). Correlation and causation in the study of personality. European Journal of Personality, 26, 372–390.Google Scholar

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.Google Scholar

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571–1582.Google Scholar

Lee, K., Ashton, M. C. (2014). The Dark Triad, the Big Five, and the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 2–5.Google Scholar

Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & de Vries, R. E. (2005). Predicting workplace delinquency and integrity with the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality structure. Human Performance, 18, 179–197.Google Scholar

Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & Shin, K. H. (2005). Personality correlates of workplace anti‐social behavior. Applied Psychology, 54, 81–98.Google Scholar

Leliveld, M. C., van Dijk, E., & van Beest, I. (2012). Punishing and compensating others at your own expense: The role of empathic concern on reactions to distributive injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 135–140.Google Scholar

Ludtke, O., Roberts, B. W., Trautwein, U., & Nagy, C. (2011). A random walk down university avenue: Life paths, life events, and personality trait change in the transition to university life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 620–637.Google Scholar

Ma, L. K., Tunney, R. J., & Ferguson, E. (2017). Does gratitude enhance prosociality? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 601–635.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000) Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181.Google Scholar

Marcus, B., Lee, A., & Ashton, M. C. (2007). Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior: Big five, or one in addition. Personnel Psychology, 60, 1–34.Google Scholar

Martin, C. C., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2015). Investigating the Goldilocks Hypothesis: The non-linear impact of trait change on well-being. Plos One 10, e0131316.Google Scholar

McAbee, S. T., & Connelly, B. S. (2016). A multi-rater framework for studying personality: The trait-reputation-identity model. Psychological Review, 123, 569–591.Google Scholar

Mount, M., Ilies, R., & Johnson, E. (2006). Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 59, 591–622.Google Scholar

Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspective on Psychological Science, 12, 183–204.Google Scholar

Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622–631.Google Scholar

Newhouse, J. P., & McClellan, M. (1998). Econometrics in outcomes research. The use of instrumental variables. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 17–34.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 557–579.Google Scholar

Odling-Smee, J., Erwin, D. H., Palkovacs, E. P., Feldman, M. W., & Laland, K. N. (2013). Niche construction theory: A practical guide for ecologists. Quarterly Review of Biology, 88, 3–28.Google Scholar

Oh, I. S., Wang, G., & Mount, M. K. (2011). Validity of observer ratings of the Five-Factor Model of personality traits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 762–773.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660–679.Google Scholar

Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–56Google Scholar

Pearl, J. (2009a). Causality: Models, reasons and inferences (2nd ed.). New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pearl, J. (2009b). Causal inference in statistics: An overview. Statistics Surveys, 3, 96–146.Google Scholar

Pearl, J. (2014). Interpretation and identification of causal mediation. Psychological Methods, 19, 459–481.Google Scholar

Peysakhovich, A., Nowak, M. A., & Rand, D. G. (2014). Humans display a ‘cooperative phenotype’ that is domain general and temporally stable. Nature Communications, 5, 1–8. Doi: 10.1038/ncomms5939Google Scholar

Rentfrow, J. P., Gosling, S. D., Jokela, M., Stillwell, D. J., Kosinski, M., & Potter, J. (2013). Divided we stand: Three psychological regions of the United States and their political, economic, social, and health correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 996–1012.Google Scholar

Rentfrow, P. J., Jokela, M., & Lamb, M. E. (2015) Regional personality differences in great Britain. PLoS ONE, 10, e0122245.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., & Mroczek, D. (2008). Personality trait change in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 31–35.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2003). Work experience and personality development in young adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 582–593.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., Kuneel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. E. (2007). The power of personality. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 117–141.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., & Jackson, J. J. (2008). Sociogenomic personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 76, 1523–1544.Google Scholar

Robins, R. W., Noftle, E. E., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Roberts, B. W. (2005). Do people know how their personality has changed? Correlates of perceived and actual personality change in young adulthood. Journal of Personality, 73, 489–521.Google Scholar

Rohrer, J. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practice in Psychological Science, 1, 27–42.Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F. (1997). The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30–43.Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117–125.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.Google Scholar

Sherman, R. A., Rauthmann, J. F., Brown, N. A., Serfass, D. G., & Jones, A. B. (2015). The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 872–888.Google Scholar

Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductively: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 38, 446–460.Google Scholar

Stolarski, M., Zajenkowski, M., & Meisenberg, G. (2013). National intelligence and personality: Their relationships and impact on national economic success. Intelligence, 41, 94–101.Google Scholar

Stormer, S., & Fahr, R. (2013). Individual determinants of work attendance: Evidence on the role of personality. Applied Economics, 45, 2863–2875.Google Scholar

Tang, T. Z., DeRuberis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Amsterdam, J., Shelton, R., & Schalet, B. (2009). Personality change during depression treatment: A placebo-controlled trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66, 132–1330.Google Scholar

Textor, J., van der Zander, B., Gilthorpe, M. S., Liskiewicz, M., & Ellison, G. T. H. (2016). Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: The R package ‘dagitty’. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45, 1887–1894.Google Scholar

Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, E. (2014). Trust in me, trust in you: A social projection account of the link between personality, cooperativeness, and trustworthiness expectations. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 61–65.Google Scholar

Urzua, S. (2008). Racial labor market gaps: The role of abilities and schooling choices. Journal of Human Resources, XLIII, 919–971.Google Scholar

Uysal, S. D., & Pohlmeier, W. (2011). Unemployment duration and personality. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 80–992.Google Scholar

Valeri, L., & VanderWele, T. J. (2013). Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: Theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. Psychological Methods, 18, 137–150.Google Scholar

Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281–300.Google Scholar

Viinikainen, J., & Kokko, K. (2012). Personality traits and unemployment: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 1204–1222.Google Scholar

Volk, S., Thöni, C., & Ruigrok, W. (2011). Personality, personal values and cooperation preferences in public goods games: A longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 810–815.Google Scholar

Volk, S., Thoni, C., & Ruigrok, W. (2012). Temporal stability and psychological foundations of cooperation preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 81, 664–676.Google Scholar

Weiss, A., Gale, C. R., Batty, G. D., & Deary, I. J. (2009). Emotionally stable, intelligent men live longer: The Vietnam Experience Study Cohort. Psychosomatic Medicine, 71, 385–394.Google Scholar

Weng, H. Y., Fox, A. S., Hessenthaler, H. C., Stodola, D. E., & Davidson, R. J. (2015). The role of compassion in altruistic helping and punishment behavior. PloS One, 10, e0143794.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., & Mullins-Sweatt, S. N. (2009). Five-Factor model of personality disorder: A proposal for DSM-V. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 197–220.Google Scholar

Wilhelm, O., Kaltwasser, L., & Hilderbrandt, A. (2018). Will the real factors for prosociality please stand up? A comment on Böckler, Tusche & Singer. (2016). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 493–499.Google Scholar

Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., & Lee, A. (2014). Honesty-humility and perceptions of organizational politics in predicting workplace outcomes. Journal of Business Psychology, 29, 235–251.Google Scholar

Yamagishi, T., Mifune, N., Li, Y., Shinda, M., Hashimoto, H., Horita, Y., Miura, A., … Simunovic, D. (2013). Is behavioral pro-sociality game-specific? Pro-social preference and expectations of pro-sociality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 260–271.Google Scholar

Yang, B., & Lester, D. (2016). Personality traits and economic activity. Applied Economics, 48, 653–657.Google Scholar

Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 259–271.Google Scholar

Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2010). The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36, 381–404.Google Scholar

Zhao, K., Ferguson, E., & Smillie, L. (2017a) Politeness and compassion differentially predict adherence to fairness norms and interventions to norm violation. Scientific Reports, 7, 3415.Google Scholar

Zhao, K., Ferguson, E., & Smillie, L. D. (2017b). When fair is not equal: Compassion and politeness diverge when predicting allocations of wealth under norms of equity and need. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 847–857.Google Scholar

Zhao, K., Ferguson, E., & Smillie, L. (2017c). Individual differences in good manners rather than compassion predict fair allocations in wealth in the dictator game. Journal of Personality, 85, 244–256.Google Scholar

Zhao, K., Ferguson, E., & Smillie, L. (2016). Prosocial personality traits differentially predict egalitarianism, generosity, and reciprocity in economic games. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1137.Google Scholar

Zhao, K., & Smillie, L. D. (2015). The role of interpersonal traits in social decision making: Exploring sources of behavioral heterogeneity in economic games. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 277–302.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, R. D. (2008). Understanding the impact of personality traits on individuals’ turnover decisions: A meta-analytic path model. Personnel Psychology, 61, 309–348.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part VII - Applications of Personality Psychology: Personality Traits and Processes in Action

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive