Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Background
- Part II Theoretical Foundations
- Part III Basic Principles of Multimedia Learning
- Part IV Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning
- Part V Principles for Managing Essential Processing in Multimedia Learning
- Part VI Principles Based on Social and Affective Features of Multimedia Learning
- 22 Principles Based on Social Cues in Multimedia Learning
- 23 The Embodiment Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 24 The Immersion Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 25 The Collaboration Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 26 The Animation Composition Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 27 The Emotional Design Principle in Multimedia Learning
- Part VII Principles Based on Generative Activity in Multimedia Learning
- Part VIII Multimedia Learning with Media
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
24 - The Immersion Principle in Multimedia Learning
from Part VI - Principles Based on Social and Affective Features of Multimedia Learning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 November 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Background
- Part II Theoretical Foundations
- Part III Basic Principles of Multimedia Learning
- Part IV Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning
- Part V Principles for Managing Essential Processing in Multimedia Learning
- Part VI Principles Based on Social and Affective Features of Multimedia Learning
- 22 Principles Based on Social Cues in Multimedia Learning
- 23 The Embodiment Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 24 The Immersion Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 25 The Collaboration Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 26 The Animation Composition Principle in Multimedia Learning
- 27 The Emotional Design Principle in Multimedia Learning
- Part VII Principles Based on Generative Activity in Multimedia Learning
- Part VIII Multimedia Learning with Media
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
The immersion principle in multimedia learning is that immersive virtual environments promote better learning when they incorporate multimedia design principles. In short, immersive media do not necessarily improve learning but effective instructional methods within immersive virtual environments do improve learning. The goal of effective instructional design in immersive virtual environments is to promote processes of selecting, organizing, and integrating information. Psychological presence – the subjective experience of “being there” – is an affective affordance of learning in immersive learning environments that can motivate learners to engage in deeper learning. The chapter also describes boundary conditions of immersive virtual environments, including the potential for instructional design to cause extraneous cognitive load and impose high metacognitive demands on learners. Multimedia learning principles developed based on research with less immersive media may generalize to learning in immersive environments.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning , pp. 296 - 303Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Alhalabi, W. (2016). Virtual reality systems enhance students’ achievements in engineering education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(11), 919–925.Google Scholar
Baceviciute, S., Mottelson, A., Terkildsen, T., & Makransky, G. (2020). Investigating representation of text and audio in educational VR using learning outcomes and EEG. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’20) (pp. 1–9). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Baceviciute, S., Terkildsen, T. S., & Makransky, G. (in press). Investigating the Redundancy Principle in Immersive Virtual Reality Environments: An Eye-tracking and EEG Study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.Google Scholar
Bailenson, J. (2018). Experience on Demand: What Vrtual Reality Is, How it Works, and What it Can Do. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Barfield, W., Zeltzer, D., Sheridan, T. B., & Slater, M. (1995). Presence and performance within virtual environments. In Barfield, W., & Furness, T. A. (eds.), Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design (pp. 473–541). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checa, D., & Bustillo, A. (2020). A review of immersive virtual reality serious games to enhance learning and training. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79(9), 5501–5527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chittaro, L., & Buttussi, F. (2015). Assessing knowledge retention of an immersive serious game vs. a traditional education method in aviation safety. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 21(4), 529–538.Google Scholar
Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272–309.Google Scholar
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C., van den Broek, E. L., & van Oostendorp, H. (2020). On the role of interaction mode and story structure in virtual reality serious games. Computers & Education, 143, 1–10.Google Scholar
Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2018). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1515–1529.Google Scholar
Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (2019). The necessary nine: Design principles for embodied VR and active stem education. In Díaz, P., Ioannou, A., Bhagat, K., & Spector, J. (eds.), Learning in a Digital World. Smart Computing and Intelligence (pp. 83–112). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Klingenberg, S., Jørgensen, M. L., Dandanell, G., Skriver, K., Mottelson, A., & Makransky, G. (2020). Investigating the effect of teaching as a general learning strategy when learning through desktop and immersive VR: A media and methods experiment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2115–2138.Google Scholar
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 943–951.Google Scholar
Lee, E. A.-L., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers and Education, 55(4), 1424–1442.Google Scholar
Makransky, G., Andreasen, N. K, Baceviciute, S., & Mayer, R. M. (2020). Immersive virtual reality increases liking but not learning with a science simulation and generative learning strategies promote learning in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology. DOI: 10.1037/edu0000473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makransky, G., Borre-Gude, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Motivational and cognitive benefits of training in immersive virtual reality based on multiple assessments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(6), 691–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makransky, G., & Lilleholt, L. (2018). A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 1141–1164.Google Scholar
Makransky, G., Mayer, R., Nøremølle, A., Cordoba, A. L., Wandall, J., & Bonde, M. (2020). Investigating the feasibility of using assessment and explanatory feedback in desktop virtual reality simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 293–317.Google Scholar
Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2019). Investigating the process of learning with desktop virtual reality: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 134, 15–30.Google Scholar
Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The Cognitive Affective Model of Immersive Learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, DOI: 10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225–236.Google Scholar
Makransky, G., Wismer, P., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). A gender matching effect in learning with pedagogical agents in an immersive virtual reality science simulation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, T., & Smith, S. P. (2001). Guiding user navigation in virtual environments using awareness of virtual off-screen space. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Guiding Users through Interactive Experiences – Usability Centred Design and Evaluation of Virtual 3D Environments, 149–154.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Principles based on social cues in multimedia learning: Personalization, voice, image, and embodiment principles. In Mayer, R. E. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed., pp. 345–370). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, O. A., Omdahl, M. K., & Makransky, G. (2019). Investigating the effect of pre-training when learning through immersive virtual reality and video: A media and methods experiment. Computers & Education, 140, 1–17.Google Scholar
Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten- year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers and Education, 56(3), 769–780.Google Scholar
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 598–610.Google Scholar
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 165–173.Google Scholar
Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 785–797.Google Scholar
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341.Google Scholar
Petersen, G. B., Klingenberg, S., Mayer, R. E., & Makransky, G. (2020). The virtual field trip: Investigating how to optimize immersive virtual learning in climate change education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2099–2115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothe, S., & Hußmann, H. (2018). Guiding the viewer in cinematic virtual reality by diegetic cues. In International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics (pp. 101–117). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(6), 603–616.Google Scholar
Snelson, C., & Hsu, Y. C. (2020). Educational 360-degree videos in virtual reality: A scoping review of the emerging research. TechTrends, 64, 404–412.Google Scholar
Terkildsen, T. S., & Makransky, G. (2019). Measuring presence in video games: An investigation of the potential use of physiological measures as indicators of presence. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 126, 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704.Google Scholar
Webster, R. (2016). Declarative knowledge acquisition in immersive virtual learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1319–1333.Google Scholar
Wu, B.., Yu, X., & Gu, X. (2020). Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality using head-mounted displays on learning performance: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 1991–2005.Google Scholar
- 13
- Cited by