Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy
- The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Labor and Democracy: Theory and Practice
- Part II History, Politics, and Law
- Part III Labor, Diversity, and Democracy
- Part IV Country and Regional Perspectives
- 14 Labor, Workers’ Rights, and Democracy in Latin America
- 15 African Perspectives on Labor Rights as Enhancers of Democratic Governance
- 16 Why (Which) Workers Often Oppose (Which) Democracy?
- 17 Reclaiming Democracy
- 18 A Critical Assessment of Democratic Labor Unionism in South Korea from a Feminist Standpoint
- Part V Labor and Democracy Sectoral Case Studies: Platform Workers, Higher Education, and the Care Industry
- Index
- References
15 - African Perspectives on Labor Rights as Enhancers of Democratic Governance
from Part IV - Country and Regional Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy
- The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Labor and Democracy: Theory and Practice
- Part II History, Politics, and Law
- Part III Labor, Diversity, and Democracy
- Part IV Country and Regional Perspectives
- 14 Labor, Workers’ Rights, and Democracy in Latin America
- 15 African Perspectives on Labor Rights as Enhancers of Democratic Governance
- 16 Why (Which) Workers Often Oppose (Which) Democracy?
- 17 Reclaiming Democracy
- 18 A Critical Assessment of Democratic Labor Unionism in South Korea from a Feminist Standpoint
- Part V Labor and Democracy Sectoral Case Studies: Platform Workers, Higher Education, and the Care Industry
- Index
- References
Summary
The importance of the struggle for labor rights and challenges to democracy in Africa can be linked to the decolonization process in the 1960s. Trade union formations had relative collective capacity to support agitation for political emancipation. The post-colonial relationship between labor movements and the state have been a mixed experience. We explore the role of labor rights as enhancers of democratic governance in Africa, using several countries as proxies for the continent. Exploration is informed largely by the ILO’s recent Centenary reflections, the link between labor rights and social justice, issues canvassed by the Global Commission on the Future of Work. The Commission provided a basis for continuing reflection among scholars and policy makers. It culminated in a rejuvenation and renewal of ILO mandate at the Centenary International Labor Conference, 2019.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy , pp. 250 - 262Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Anner, Mark, and Caraway, Teri. 2010. “International Institutions and Workers’ Rights: Between Labor Standards and Market Flexibility,” Studies in Comparative International Development 42, 2: 151–169.Google Scholar
Berg, Janine. 2011. Labour Markets, Institutions, and Inequality: Building Just Societies in the Twenty-First Century. Geneva: International Labor Office.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding,” Journal of Democracy 21, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birchall, Johnston. 2001. “Organizing Workers in the Informal Sector: A Strategy for Trade Union-Cooperative Action.” COOP Working Paper 01-1, International Labor Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Bonner, Christine, and Spooner, Dave. 2011. “Organizing in the Informal Economy: A Challenge for Trade Unions,” International Politics and Society 2: 87–105.Google Scholar
Calenzo, Gaetano. 2009. “Labour Movements in Democratisation: Comparing South Africa and Nigeria.” Paper presented at the 5th CEU Graduate Conference in Social Sciences, Old Challenges in a New Era: Development and Participation. Budapest (June 19–21 2009).Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando. 1985. “Transizione politica in America Latina?” In Scartezzini, Riccardo, Germani, Luis, Gritti, Roberto, and Paci, Massimo, eds. I limiti della democrazia. Autoritarismo e democrazia nella società moderna. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L., and Arato, Andrew. 1995. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, Karen. 2004. “Democracy, Freedom of Association, and the ILO,” in Javillier, Jean-Claude and Gernigon, Bernard, eds. Les Normes Internationales du Travail: Un Patrimoine pour L’avenir. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2017. “Human Rights,” in Baylis, John, Smith, Steve, and Owens, Patricia, eds. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 497–513.Google Scholar
Fasih, Tazeen, Patrinos, Harry, and Shafiq, Najeeb. 2020. “The Impact of COVID-19 on Labor Market Outcomes: Lessons from Past Economic Crises,” Education for Global Development, World Bank (May 20, 2020) https://blogs.worldbank.org/education/impact-covid-19-labor-market-outcomes-lessons-past-economic-crisesGoogle Scholar
Freund, Bill. 1984. “Labor and Labor History in Africa: A Review of the Literature.” African Studies Review 27, 2: 1–58.Google Scholar
Gallin, Dan. 2001. “Propositions on Trade Unions and Informal Employment in Times of Globalisation,” in Willis, Jane and Waterman, Peter, eds. Place, Space, and the New Labor Internationalisms. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Richard. 1971. Marxism and the Sociology of Trade Unionism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
ILO. 2002. Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
ILO. 2004. International Labor Conference, 92nd Session, 2004, Record of Proceedings. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
ILO. 2006. Digest of Decisions and Principles of the Freedom of Association Committee of the Governing Body of the ILO, 5th ed. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
ILO. 2010. Manual on Surveys of Informal Employment and Informal Sector. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
ILO. 2012. ILO Committee on Freedom of Association. Complaint against the Government of Swaziland Presented by the Trade Union Conference of Swaziland and the International Trade Union Confederation, Case No. 2949, Report No. 367, Interim Report. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
ILO. 2013. 367th Report of the Committee on Freedom of Association. Presented at the 317th Session of the Governing Body. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
ILO. 2015. Report of the ILO’s Director General: The Future of Work Centenary Initiative. Presented at the 104th Session of the International Labor Conference. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
ILO. 2018. Compilation of Decisions of the Committee on Freedom of Association, 6th ed. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
ILO. 2019. Work for a Brighter Future—Global Commission on the Future of Work. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
Jose, A. V. 2002. “Organised Labour in the twenty-first Century – Some Lessons for Developing Countries,” in Jose, A. V., ed. Organised Labour in the Twenty-First Century. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Jütting, Johannes, and Laiglesia, Juan Ramón de. 2009. Is Informal Normal? Towards More and Better Jobs in Developing Countries. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayizzi-Mugerwa, Steve. 2002. “Privatisation in Sub-Saharan Africa: On Factors Affecting Implementation.” UNU-WIDER Working Paper Series DP20002–12. Helsinki: United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research.Google Scholar
Kester, Gerard, and Sidibé, Ousmane Oumarou. 2019. “Trade Unions, It’s Your Turn!” in Kester, Gerard, and Sidibé, Ousmane Oumarou, eds. Trade Unions and Sustainable Democracy in Africa. London: Routledge, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, Claire. 2019. “Taking the Measure of Changing Labour Mobilisation at the International Labour Organisation,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 68, 3: 665–697.Google Scholar
Kraus, Jon. 1995. “Trade Unions in Africa, Democratic Renewal and Transitions: An Introduction,” in Kraus, Jon, ed. Trade Unions and the Coming of Democracy in Africa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Lindell, Ilda. 2009. “Global Movements: Place, Struggle, and Transnational Organising by Informal Workers,” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 91, 2: 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy,” The American Political Science Review 53, 1: 69–105.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1904. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. N.I. Stone, trans. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr Publishing.Google Scholar
Mengistu, Berhanu, and Vogel, Elizabeth. 2009. “Public Perceptions of Privatization in Ethiopia: A Case for Public Good or Private Gain?” International Journal of Public Administration 32, 8: 681–703.Google Scholar
Milman-Sivan, Faina. 2009. “Freedom of Association as a Core Labor Right and the ILO: Toward a Normative Framework,” Law & Ethics of Human Rights 3, 2: 109–153.Google Scholar
Pitcher, M. Anne. 2002. Transforming Mozambique: The Politics of Privatisation, 1975–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. 2013. “Unionisation, Inequality, and Redistribution,” British Journal of Industrial Relations 51, 4: 797–825.Google Scholar
Prasnikar, Janez. 1991. Workers’ Participation and Self-Management in Developing Countries. San Francisco: West View Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, Benedetta. 2014. “Migration and Emancipation in West Africa’s Labor History: The Missing Links,” Slavery & Abolition 35, 1: 23–46.Google Scholar
Seidman, Gay. 1994. Manufacturing Militance: Workers’ Movements in Brazil and South Africa, 1970–1985. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Smit, Nicola, and Fourie, Elmarie. 2010. “Extending Protection to Atypical Workers, Including Workers in the Informal Economy in Developing Countries,” The International Journal of Comparative Labor Law and Industrial Relations 26, 1: 43–60.Google Scholar
Sundar, K. R. Shyam. 2006. “Trade Unions and the New Challenges: One Step Forward and Two Steps Backwards,” Indian Journal of Labour Economics 49, 4: 895–910.Google Scholar
Tangri, Roger. 1995. “The Politics of Africa’s Public and Private Enterprise,” The Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 33, 2: 169–184.Google Scholar
Unni, Jeemol, and Rani, Uma. 2003. “Employment and Income in the Informal Economy: A Micro-Perspective,” in Jhabvala, Renana, Sudarshan, Ratna, and Unni, Jeemol, eds. Informal Economy Center Stage: New Structures of Employment, 39–61. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J. Samuel. 1989. “Labor Movements in Transitions to Democracy: A Framework for Analysis.” Comparative Politics 21, 4: 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vosko, Leah. 2007. “Representing Informal Economy Workers: Emerging Global Strategies and Their Lessons for North American Unions,” in Cobble, Dorothy, ed. The Sex of Class: Women Transforming American Labor. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, pp. 272–292.Google Scholar
Wolfsfeld, G. 2015. INFOCORE Definitions: “Political Actors.” Herzliya, Interdisciplinary Center. www.infocore.eu/results/definitionsGoogle Scholar
Wood, Geoffrey, and Dibben, Pauline. 2008. “The Challenges Facing the South African Labour Movement: Mobilisation of Diverse Constituencies in a Changing Context.” Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations 63, 4: 671–693.Google Scholar