American Association of Teachers of Korean. 2015. The standards-based college Korean curriculum for Korean language education. Korean Language in America 19(2): 149–460.Google Scholar

Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Byrnes, H. 2008. Articulating a foreign language sequence through content: A look at the culture standards. Language Teaching 41(1): 103–18.Google Scholar

Byrnes, H., Maxim, Init, and Norris, J.. 2010. Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. The Modern Language Journal 94(Supplement).Google Scholar

Choi, G-J. 2006. A study on teaching and learning methods of Korean language through traditional fairy tales. Journal of Korean Language Education 17(2): 237–66.Google Scholar

Chung, D-W. 2011. A study of developing Korean writing class integrating content-based instruction and genre-based instruction. Journal of the International Network for Korean Language and Culture 8(1): 131–58.Google Scholar

Derewianka, B. 2003. Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC 34(2): 133–54.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. 2002. Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: 113–35.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. 2003. Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing 12: 17–29.Google Scholar

Kern, R. 2000. Literacy and Language Teaching. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, H. 2008. A genre analysis of academic oral presentations in Korean by foreign graduate students. Bilingual Research 37: 133–74.Google Scholar

Lee, K-S. 2003. Korean literature education through the teaching method of genre combination. Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language 28: 169–99.Google Scholar

Lee, M-H. 2016. Text, genre-based Korean writing education. Proceedings of the 45th spring conference of the International Association of Korean Language Education, pp. 33–47.Google Scholar

Lee, S-H. 1999. Research on the Korean class through a fable. Journal of Korean Language Education 10(2): 257–71.Google Scholar

Marshall, Inku-Kim. 2005. Once Upon a Time in Korea. Seoul: Hangukmunhwasa.Google Scholar

Martin, J., R. 2009. Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education 20: 10–21.Google Scholar

Morgan, J., and Rinvolucri, M.. 1983. Once Upon a Time: Using Stories in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Paltridge, B. 1996. Genre, text type, and the language learning classroom. ELT Journal 50(3): 237–43.Google Scholar

Paltridge, B. 2001. Genre and the Language Learning Classroom. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Redmann, J. 2005. An interactive reading journal for all levels of the foreign language curriculum. Foreign Language Annals 38(4): 483–92.Google Scholar

Ryshina-Pankova, M. 2017. Scaffolding foreign language literacy: Implementing the genre-based approach. Keynote address delivered at Consortium for Language Teaching and Learning Conference at Brown University, May 6–7, 2017.Google Scholar

Suh, J., and Yun, Y.. 2012. Genre-based curriculum development for advanced learners at the college level. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the International Association of Korean Language Education.Google Scholar

Taylor., E. 2000. Using Folktales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wajnryb, R. 2003. Stories: Narrative Activities in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wang, H-S. 2008a. Frog’s Tears and Other Stories: Readings in Korean Culture. Boston: Cheng & Tsui.Google Scholar

Wang, H-S. 2008b. Folk Tales in Korean Language and Culture Education. Paper presented at the 13th annual conference of the American Association of Teachers of Korean, SUNY-Binghamton, June 2008.Google Scholar

ACTFL. 1984. ACTFL provisional proficiency guidelines. Foreign Language Annals 17: 453–9.Google Scholar

ACTFL. 1998. Performance Guidelines for K-12 Learners. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar

ACTFL. 2012a. ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar

ACTFL. 2012b. Oral Proficiency Interview Tester Training Manual, edited by Swender, E. and Vicars, R.. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar

ACTFL. 2012c. Standards for Foreign Language Learning in the 21^st Century—Produced exclusively for American Association of Teachers of Korean. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press Inc.Google Scholar

ACTFL. 2015. Performance Descriptors for Language Learners. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar

Adair-Hauck, B., Glisan, E. W., and Troyan, F. J.. 2013. Implementing Integrated Performance Assessment. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. F. 1988. Problems in examining the validity of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10–12: 149–64.Google Scholar

Dandonoli, P., and Henning, G.. 1990. An investigation of the construct validity of the ACTFL proficiency guidelines and oral interview procedure. Foreign Language Annals 23–1: 11–22.Google Scholar

Glisan, E. W., Uribe, D., and Adair-Hauck, B.. 2007. Research on Integrated Performance Assessment at the post-secondary level: Student performance across the modes of communication. The Canadian Modern Language Review 64: 39–68.Google Scholar

Green, A. 2014. Exploring Language Assessment and Testing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hanna, G. S., and Dettmer, P. A.. 2004. Assessment for Effective Teaching: Using Context-Adaptive Planning. Boston, MA: Pearson A & B.Google Scholar

Henning, G. 1992. The ACTFL oral proficiency interview: Validity evidence. System 20–3: 365–72.Google Scholar

Interagency Language Roundtable. 2011. ILR Skill Level Descriptions (1986). Available at: www.govtilr.org [last accessed September 6, 2020].Google Scholar

Kang, S. 2016a. Proficiency Assessment: Revisited-Current Issues, Special Interview, Journal of KLACES (Korean Language and Culture Education Society), pp. 3–5.Google Scholar

Kang, S. 2016b. Linking assessment and learning via performance and proficiency assessment. International Journal of Korean Language Education 2(2): 97–123.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P., and Frawley, W.. 1988. Proficiency: Understanding the construct. Studies in the Second Language Acquisition 10–12: 181–95.Google Scholar

Liskin-Gasparro, J. E. 1984. The ACTFL proficiency guidelines: An historical perspective. In Higgs, T. V., ed., Teaching for Proficiency: The Organizing Principle. The ACTFL Foreign Language Education Series. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC/Contemporary Publishing Group, pp. 11–42.Google Scholar

The National Standards Collaborative Board. 2015. World Readiness Standards for Learning Languages, 4th ed. Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar

Surface, E. A., and Dierdorff, E. C.. 2003. Reliability and the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview. Foreign Language Annals 36: 4.Google Scholar

Surface, E. A., Poncheri, R. M., and Bahvsar, K. S.. 2008. Two Studies Investigating the Reliability and Validity of the English ACTFL OPIc with Korean Test Takers. Raleigh, NC: SWA Consulting Inc.Google Scholar

Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J.. 2005. Understanding by Design, 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Barraja-Rohan, Anne-Marie. 2011. Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence. Language Teaching Research 15(4): 479–507.Google Scholar

Bolden, Galina. 2009. Beyond answering: Repeat-prefaced responses in conversation. Communication Monographs 76(2): 121–43.Google Scholar

Brouwer, Catherine E., and Wagner, Johannes. 2004. Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 29–47.Google Scholar

Canale, Michael and Swain, Merrill. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1: 1–47.Google Scholar

Cekaite, Asta. 2007. A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal 91(1): 45–62.Google Scholar

Clayman, Steven E., and Heritage, John. 2002. The News Interviews: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clift, Rebecca. 2016. Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Creider, 2007. Pragmatically completed unfinished turns (PCUUs). Unpublished manuscript, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Farina, Clelia, Pochon-Berger, Evelyne, and Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2012. Le dévelopment de la compétence d’interaction: Une étude sur le travail lexical. Travauxs Neuchatelois de linguistique 57: 101–19.Google Scholar

Ford, Cecilia E., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., and Thompson, S. A., eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 134–84.Google Scholar

Gardner, Hilary, and Forrester, Michael. 2010. Analysing Interactions in Childhood: Insights from Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1996. Transparent vision. In Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., and Thompson, S. A., eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 370–404.Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto, and Hayano, Kaoru. 2013. Proffering insertable elements: A study of other-initiated repair in Japanese. In Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., Sidnell, J., eds., Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 293–321.Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto, and Kim, Stephanie Hyeri. 2015. Turn formats for other-initiated repair and their relation to trouble sources: Some observations from Japanese and Korean conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 87: 198–217.Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto, and Yoon, Kyung-Eun. 2006. A cross-linguistic exploration of demonstratives in interaction: With particular reference to the context of word-formulation trouble. Studies in Language 30(3): 485–540.Google Scholar

He, Agnes W. 2004. CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. Modern Language Journal 88: 536–50.Google Scholar

He, Agnes W., and Young, Richard F.. 1998. Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. In Young, R. and He, A. W., eds., Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Hellermann, John. 2007. The development of practices for action in classroom dyadic interaction: Focus on task openings. The Modern Language Journal 91(1): 83–96.Google Scholar

Hellermann, John. 2008. Social Actions for Classroom Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Hellermann, John. 2009. Practices for dispreferred responses using no by a learner of English. Interactional Review of Applied Linguistics 47: 95–126.Google Scholar

Hellermann, John. 2011. Members’ methods, members’ competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigation of other-initiated repair. In Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., and Pekarek Doehler, S., eds., L2 Interactional Competence and Development. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 147–72.Google Scholar

Hellermann, John, and Pekarek Doehler, Simona 2010. On the contingent nature of language-learning-tasks. Classroom Discourse 1(1): 25–45.Google Scholar

Heritage, John, and Raymond, Geoffrey. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38.Google Scholar

Huth, T., and Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen. 2006. How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? Language Teaching Research 10: 53–79.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1966. Two types of linguistic relativity. In Bright, W., Sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 114–58.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1967. Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues 23(2): 8–38.Google Scholar

Kasper, Gabriele. 2004. Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. Modern Language Journal 88: 551–67.Google Scholar

Kasper, Gabriele. 2006. Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review 19: 83–99.Google Scholar

Kecskaes, Istvan, Sanders, Robert E., and Pomerantz, Anita. 2018. The basic interactional competence of language learners. Journal of Pragmatics 124: 88–105.Google Scholar

Kim, Eun Ho. 2013. Development of interactional competence in L2 Korean. The use of Korean interpersonal endings -canh- and -ketun. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar

Kim, Eun Ho. 2014. L2 speakers’ use of Korean sentence-ending suffix -ketun: A conversation-analytic perspective. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 22(1): 23–60.Google Scholar

Kim, Haeyeon. 1999. The form and function of questions in Korean conversation. Tamhwa wa inji [Discourse and Cognition]. 6(2): 211–47.Google Scholar

Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie. 2013. Reshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning to respond to questions in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 57: 303–17.Google Scholar

Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1999a. Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation: Types and functions. Tamhwa wa inji [Discourse and Cognition]. 6(6): 141–68.Google Scholar

Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1999b. Phrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences in Korean conversation. Human Studies 22: 425–46.Google Scholar

Kim, Kyu-hyun. 2001. Confirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaboration: Organization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation. In Selting, M. and Couper-Kuhlen, E., eds., Studies in Interactional Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 345–72.Google Scholar

Kim, Kyu-hyun. 2007. Sequential organization of post-predicate elements in Korean conversation: Pursuing uptake and modulating action. Pragmatics 17: 573–604.Google Scholar

Kim, Kyu-hyun, and Suh, Kyung-hee. 2002. Demonstratives as prospective indexicals: ku and ce in Korean conversation. In Akatsuka, N. and Strauss, S., eds., Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 10. Stanford, CA: Center for Study of Language and Information, pp. 192–205.Google Scholar

Kim, Mary Shin. 2013. Answering questions about the unquestionable in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 57: 138–57.Google Scholar

Kim, Mary Shin. 2015. A distinct declarative question design in Korean conversation: An examination of turn-final ko questions. Journal of Pragmatics 79: 60–78.Google Scholar

Kim, Mary Shin, and Kim, Stephanie Hyeri. 2014. Initiating repair with and without particles: Alternative formats of other-initiation of repair in Korean conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 47(4): 331–52.Google Scholar

Kim, Stephanie Hyeri. 2015. Resisting the terms of polar questions through ani (‘No’)-prefacing in Korean conversation. Discourse Processes 52(4): 11–334.Google Scholar

Kim, Younhee. 2009. The Korean discourse markers -nuntey and kuntey in native-non-native conversation: An acquisitional perspective. In Nguyen, H. and Kasper, G., eds., Talk-In-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, pp. 317–50.Google Scholar

Koshik, Irene. 2003. Wh-questions as challenges. Discourse Studies 1: 51–77.Google Scholar

Koshik, Irene. 2005. Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kramsch, Claire. 1986. From language proficiency to interactional competence. Modern Language Journal 70: 366–72.Google Scholar

Lee, Hyo Sangl. 1999. A discourse-pragmatic analysis of the committal -ci in Korean. Journal of Pragmatics 20: 327–58.Google Scholar

Lee, Seung-Hee. 2015. Two forms of affirmative responses to polar questions. Discourse Processes 52: 21–46.Google Scholar

Markee, Numa. 2000. Conversation Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Masuda, Kyoko. 2011. Acquiring interactional competence in a study abroad context: Japanese language learners’ use of the interactional particle ne. Modern Language Journal 95(4): 519–40.Google Scholar

Mori, Juko. 2004. Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. Modern Language Journal 88: 536–50.Google Scholar

Oh, Sun-Young, and Park, Yong-Yae. 2017. Interactional uses of acknowledgment tokens: “ung” and “e” as responses to multi-unit turns in Korean conversation. In Raymond, G., Lerner, G. H., and Heritage, J., eds., Enabling Human Conduct. Studies of Talk-in-interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 145–66.Google Scholar

Packett, Andrew. 2005. Teaching patterns of interaction of English for specific purposes. In Richards, K. and Seedhouse, P., eds., Applying Conversation Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 235–50.Google Scholar

Park, Jae-Eun. 2016. Turn-taking in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 99: 62–77.Google Scholar

Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Pochon-Berger, Evelyne. 2015. The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In Cadierno, T. and Eskildsen, S., eds., Usage-based Perspectives on Second Language Learning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 233–68.Google Scholar

Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 68: 939–67.Google Scholar

Ross, Steve J., and Kasper, Gabriele, eds., 2013. Assessing Second Language Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emmanuel A. 1968. Sequencing in conversational openings. American Journal of Sociology 70: 1075–95.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1982. Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uhhuh” and other things that come between sentences. In Tannen, D., ed., Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 71–93.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. A. 1986. The routine as achievement. Human Studies 9: 111–51.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes 23: 499–545.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail, and Sacks, Harvey. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2): 361–82.Google Scholar

Seedhouse, Paul. 2004. Conversation analysis and language learning. Language Teaching 38: 165–87.Google Scholar

Seedhouse, Paul, and Walsh, Steve. 2010. Learning a second language through classroom interaction. In Seedhous, P., Walsh, S., and Jenks, C., eds., Conceptualising “Learning” in Applied Linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 127–46.Google Scholar

Sohn, Ho-min. 1999. The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya. 2010. An overview of the question–response system in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2772–81.Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya, and Hayashi, Makoto. 2010. Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints. Language in Society 39: 1–38.Google Scholar

Tanaka, Hiroko. 2001. Adverbials for turn projection in Japanese: Toward a demystification of the “telephatic” mode of communication. Language in Society 30(4): 559–87.Google Scholar

Tanaka, Hiroko. 2015. Action-projection in Japanese conversation: Topic particles wa, mo, and tte for triggering categorization activities. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1113. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01113Google Scholar

Taguchi, Naoko. 2014. Development of interactional competence in Japanese as a second language: Use of incomplete sentences as interactional resources. Modern Language Journal 98(2): 518–35.Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A., and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2005. The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 481–506.Google Scholar

Wong, Jean, and Waring, Hansun Zhang. 2010. Conversation Analysis and Second Language Pedagogy: A Guide for ESL/ELF Teachers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina. 2006. Initiating repair and beyond: The use of two repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin conversation. Discourse Processes 41(1): 67–109.Google Scholar

Yoon, Kyung-Eun. 2006. Interrogatives with question words as complaint utterances in Korean conversation. In Vance, T.J., and Jones, K., eds., Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 14. Stanford, CA: Center for Study of Language and Information, pp. 423–34.Google Scholar

Yoon, Kyung-Eun. 2007. Application of conversation analysis to teaching Korean language and culture. The Korean Language in America 12: 126–44.Google Scholar

Yoon, Kyung-Eun. 2010. Questions and responses in Korean. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2782–98.Google Scholar

Yoon, Kyung-Eun. 2012. Other-initiated repair as language learning resources. In Byon, A. S. and Pyun, D. O., eds., Teaching and Learning Korean as a Foreign Language: A Collection of Empirical Studies. Columbus, OH: National East Asian Languages Resource Center, Ohio State University, pp. 9–23.Google Scholar

Young, Richard F. 2002. Discourse approaches to oral language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 19: 105–32.Google Scholar

Young, Richard F. 2008. Language and Interaction: An Advanced Resource Book. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Young, Richard F. 2011. Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. In Hinkel, E., ed., Handbook of Research in Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Routledge, pp. 426–43.Google Scholar

Young, Richard F. 2014. What is interactional competence? AL Forum of the Applied Linguists Interest Section of TESOL International Association. Available at: http://newsmanager.commpartners.com/tesolalis/print/2014-08-27/8.html [last accessed September 21, 2020].Google Scholar

Young, Richard F., and Miller, Elizabeth R.. 2004. Learning as changing participation: Negotiating discourse roles in the ESL writing conference. Modern Language Journal 88: 519–35.Google Scholar

Young, Richard F., and Lee, Jina. 2004. Identifying units in interaction: Reactive tokens in Korean and English conversations. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(3): 380–407.Google Scholar

Baars, B. 1988. A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, E., Monstrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 39: 129–81.Google Scholar

Bloommaert, J., Collins, J., and Slembrouck, S.. 2005. Spaces of multilingualism. Language and Communication 25(3): 197–216.Google Scholar

Bowles, M. 2011. Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(2): 247–71.Google Scholar

Carlson, R., and Dulany, D.. 1985. Conscious attention and abstraction in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11: 45–58.Google Scholar

Chaudron, C. 1985. Intake: On models and methods for discovering learners’ processing of input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7: 1–14.Google Scholar

Choi, J., Lee, J., and Oh, J.. 2018. Examining the oral language competency of children from Korean immigrant families in English-only and dual language immersion schools. Journal of Early Childhood Research 16(1): 32–51.Google Scholar

Cloud, N., Genessee, F., and Hamayan, D.. 2000. Dual Language Instruction: A Handbook for Enriched Education. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar

Collier, V. and Thomas, W.. 2004. The astounding effectiveness of dual language education for all. NABE Journal of Research and Practice 2(1): 1–20.Google Scholar

Gass, S. 1988. Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics 9: 198–217.Google Scholar

Hulstijn, J. 2015. Language Proficiency in Native and Non-Native Speakers: Theory and Research. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kim, A., Park, A., and Lust, B.. 2018. Simultaneous vs. successive bilingualism among preschool-aged children: A study of four-year-old Korean-English bilinguals in the USA. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualsim 21(2): 164–78.Google Scholar

Kim, E. 2002. Investigating the acquisition of Korean particles by beginning and intermediate learners. The Korean Language in America 7: 165–76.Google Scholar

Kim, H. 2012. Identifying the source of stabilization in Korean heritage learners: A comparative data analysis of HL learners and bilingual children. In Byon, A. and Pyun, D., eds., Teaching and Learning Korean as a Foreign Language: A Collection of Empirical Studies. Columbus: The Ohio State University Foreign Language Publications, pp. 209–27.Google Scholar

Kim, I. 2012. Phenomena of discourse marker use of bilingual children and implications for heritage language education. The Korean Language in America 17(1):24–54.Google Scholar

Kim, J. 2001. The degree of L1 interference among heritage and non-heritage learners of Korean: Do heritage students have advantages over non-heritage students? The Korean Language in America 6: 285–96.Google Scholar

Kim, M. 2013. The mental lexicon of low-proficiency Korean heritage learners. Heritage Language Journal 10(1): 17–35.Google Scholar

Kim, S. 2017. A situated perspective on bilingual development: Preschool Korean-English bilinguals’ utilization of two languages and Korean honorifics. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 20(1): 1–19.Google Scholar

Lee, J., and Shin, S. 2008. Korean heritage language education in the United States: The current state, opportunities, and possibilities. Heritage Language Journal 6(2): 153–72.Google Scholar

Lindholm-Leary, K., and Howard, E.. 2008. Language development and academic achievement in two-way immersion programs. In Fortune, T. and Tedick, D., eds., Pathway to Multilingualism: Evolving Perspectives of Dual Immersion Education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 177–200.Google Scholar

Merrill, C. 2002. The future of Korean language education in the U.S. Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language 28: 301–35.Google Scholar

O’Grady, W., Lee, M., and Choo, M.. 2000. The acquisition of relative clauses by heritage and non-heritage learners of Korean as a second language. The Korean Language in America 5: 245–56.Google Scholar

Park-Johnson, S. 2017. Code mixing as a window into language dominance: Evidence from Korean heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal 14(1): 49–69.Google Scholar

Padilla, A., Sung, H., and Aninao, J.. 1997. Less-commonly taught languages in selected elementary and secondary schools in California. Final report. Foreign Language Assistance Act Program: Evaluation project. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. 2015. When L1 becomes an L3: Do heritage speakers make better L3 learners? Bilingualism, Language and Cognition 18: 163–78.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M., and Kagan, O.. 2007. Heritage languages: In the “wild” and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass 1: 368–95.Google Scholar

Portes, A. and Rumbaut, R.. 2006. Immigrant America: A portrait, 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Potowski, K., Jegerski, J., and Morgan-Short, K.. 2009. The effects of instruction on linguistic development in Spanish heritage language speakers. Language Learning 59(3): 537–79.Google Scholar

Ro, Y., and Cheatham, G.. 2009. Biliteracy and bilingual development in a second-generation Korean child. Journal of Research in Childhood Education 23(3): 290–308.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., and Treffers-Daller, J.. 2014. A prolegomenon to the construct of the native speaker: Heritage speaker bilinguals are natives too! Applied Linguistics 35(1): 93–8.Google Scholar

Rumbaut, R. 2009. A language graveyard? The evolution of language competencies, preferences and use among young adult children of immigrants. In Wiley, T., Lee, J., and Rumberger, R., eds., The Education of Language Minority Immigrants in the United States. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 35–71.Google Scholar

Schmid, C. 2001. The Politics of Language: Conflict, Identity, and Cultural Pluralism in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11: 129–58.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. 1995. Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In Schmidt, R., ed., Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (Technical Report #9). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. 2001. Attention. In Robinson, P., ed., Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar

Shin, S. 2018. Bilingualism in Schools and Society: Language, Identity, and Policy, 2nd ed. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shin, S., and Joo, A.. 2015. Lexical errors in Korean-Australian heritage learners’ compositions. Journal of Korean Language Education 26: 129–62.Google Scholar

Torres, J. 2013. Heritage and second language learners of Spanish: The roles of task complexity and inhibitory control. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University. Retrieved from: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/558678/Torres_georgetown_0076D_12015.pdf;sequence=1 [last accessed September 6, 2020].Google Scholar

Valdes, G. 2001. Heritage language students: Profiles and possibilities. In Peyton, J., Renard, D., and McGinnis, S., eds., Heritage Languages in America: Preserving a National Resource. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, pp. 37–77.Google Scholar

Van Deusen-Scholl, N. 2003. Toward a definition of heritage language: Sociopolitical and pedagogical considerations. Journal of Language, Identity and Education 2: 211–30.Google Scholar

VanPatten, B. 1994. Evaluating the role of consciousness in second language acquisition: Terms, linguistic features and research methodology. AILA Review 11: 27–36.Google Scholar

Zyzik, E. 2016. Toward a prototype model of the heritage language learner: Understanding strengths and needs. In Fairclough, M. and Beaudrie, S., eds., Innovative Strategies for Heritage Language Teaching: A Practical Guide for the Classroom. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 19–38.Google Scholar

The Bank of Korea. 2018. ECOS (Economic Statistics System) National Accounts. Homepage of the Bank of Korea.Google Scholar

Choi, Gwangsik. 2013. Korean Wave Road [한류 로드]. Seoul: Nanam Press.Google Scholar

Choi, Gyungbong. 2005. The Birth of Korean Language [우리말의 탄생]. Seoul: Chaekkwahamkke.Google Scholar

Choi, Gyungbong. 2012. Hangeul Democracy [한글 민주주의]. Seoul: Chaekkwahamkke.Google Scholar

Choi, Hyeonbae. 1947. The Revolution of Letters [글자의 혁명]. Seoul: Joseon Gyohak Doseo Cooperation.Google Scholar

Choi, Hyeonbae. 1962. Christianity and Hangeul. Theological Forum [신학논단] 7: 51–76. Seoul: College of Theology and the United Graduate School of Theology, Yonsei University.Google Scholar

Eberhard, David M., Simons, G. F., and Fenning, C. D., eds. 2019. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 22nd ed. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. 2005. The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heo, Jaeyoung. 2004. The trends of eradication of illiteracy and illumination policy from the age of EMRT (Enlightenment Modern Recent Times) to the 1960s. The Education of Korean Language [국어교육연구] 13: 577–605. Korean Language Education Research Institute, Seoul National University.Google Scholar

Hong, Yunpyo. 2013. The Story of Hangeul [한글 이야기] vol. I and II. Seoul: Thaehaksa.Google Scholar

Hyundai Research Institute. 2014. Weekly Economic Review. No. 610. October 2, 2014. Hyundai Research Institute.Google Scholar

Jeong, Hosung. 2000. The vocabulary distribution of the Korean standard unabridged dictionary. Saegugeosaenghwal [새국어생활] 10–1: 55–72. The National Institute of the Korean Language.Google Scholar

Joseon Language Society. 1933. The Draft for Unified Spelling System of Korean [한글 맞춤법 통일안]. Seoul: Joseon Language Society.Google Scholar

Joseon Language Society. 1936. Standard Lexicon of the Korean Language [사정(査定)한 조선어 표준말 모음]. Seoul: Joseon Language Society.Google Scholar

Joseon Language Society. 1940. Korean Romanization [조선어 로마자 표기법]. Seoul: Joseon Language Society.Google Scholar

Joseon Language Society. 1940. Loanword Orthography [외래어 표기법]. Seoul: Joseon Language Society.Google Scholar

Kim, Choong Soon. 2014. Way Back into Korea: A New Insight by a Native Anthropologist Come Home. Seoul: Ilchokak.Google Scholar

Kim, Hyeongcheol. 1997. The Study of Korean Language in the Period of Enlightenment [개화기 국어 연구]. Changwon: Gyeongnam University Press.Google Scholar

Kim, Juwon. 2013. Hunminjeongeum [훈민정음]. Seoul: Mineumsa.Google Scholar

Kim, Minsu. 1973. Korean Language Policy [국어 정책론]. Seoul: Korea University Press.Google Scholar

Kim, Minsu. 1986. The Study of Ju Sigyeong [주시경 연구]. Seoul: Tower Press.Google Scholar

Kim, Seulong. 2007. Hunminjeongeum, Character Revolution Made by 28 Letters [28자로 이룬 혁명, 훈민정음]. Seoul: Aiseum.Google Scholar

Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. 2010. Linguistic and cultural identity and global partnership. In Fouser, Robert J., ed., Contemporary Korean Linguistics: International Perspectives in Honor of Professor Sang-Oak Lee. Seoul: Thaehaksa.Google Scholar

Korea Immigration Service. 2014. Korea Immigration Service monthly statistics report. June 2014. Korea Immigration Service.Google Scholar

Korean Bible Society. 1993. The History of Korean Bible Society I. Seoul: Korean Bible Society.Google Scholar

Korean Bible Society. 1994. The History of Korean Bible Society II. Seoul: Korean Bible Society.Google Scholar

Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). 2007. The Korea IP news quarterly. December 2007. Seoul: Korean Intellectual Property Office.Google Scholar

Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). 2018. GDP statistical diagram. Seoul: Korean Statistical Information Service.Google Scholar

Landry, R., and Allard, R.. 1992. Ethnolinguistic vitality and bilingual development of minority and majority group students. In Fase, W., Jaspaert, K., and Kroon, S., eds., Maintenance and Loss of Minority Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 223–51.Google Scholar

Lee, Eungho. 1974. The History of Hangeul Movement in the US Military Government [개화기 한글 운동사]. Seoul: Seong Cheong Sa.Google Scholar

Min, Hyunsik. 1993. Medieval Korean Reading [중세 국어 강독]. Seoul: Kaemunsa.Google Scholar

Min, Hyunsik. 1994a. The study on the Korean language style of enlightenment age I. The Korean Language Education [국어교육] 83: 113–52. The Society of Korean Language Education.Google Scholar

Min, Hyunsik. 1994b. The study on the Korean language style of enlightenment age II. The Society of Korean Language Education [국어교육] 84: 101–23.Google Scholar

Min, Hyunsik. 2014. Re-establishment of Chinese character education status in Korean language course. Seoncheongeomun [선교어문] 40: 155–207. Seoul: Department of Korean Language Education, Seoul National University.Google Scholar

Min, Hyunsik. 2015. The relationship between national development and mother tongue education in South Korea. Korean Language Education Research [국어교육학연 구] 50(5): 229–65.Google Scholar

Min, Hyunsik. 2016. Intellectual history of Hangeul culture. Journal of the International Network for Korean Language and Culture [한국언어문화학] 13(3): 93–118.Google Scholar

Ministry of Education. 2014. A report of the Ministry of Education: Education that makes everyone happy; Creative talents heralding the future. Seoul: Ministry of Education Press.Google Scholar

Ministry of Education. 2020. Summary of Educational Statistics. Seoul: Ministry of Education Press.Google Scholar

Moon, Pal Yong. 1991. The Saemaul (New Community) Movement (1971). In Cho, Lee-Jay and Kim, Yoon Hyung, eds., Economic Development in the Republic of Korea – A Policy Perspective. Hawaii: East-West Center, pp. 405–30.Google Scholar

National Hangeul Museum. 2014. The Path Hangeul Have Followed [한글이 걸어온 길]. Seoul: National Hangeul Museum Press.Google Scholar

Noma, Hideki. 2010. Hanguru no tanjou [ハングルの誕生]. Heibonsha Series (平凡社新書) 523. Tokyo: Heibonsha. Translated by J. Kim, G. Kim, and S. Park. 2011. Birth of Hangeul [한글의 탄생]. Seoul: Dolbege.Google Scholar

The National Institute of the Korean Language. 2008. Written Plainly so as to Be Understood by Everyone Hunminjeongeum [알기 쉽게 풀어쓴 훈민정음]. Seoul: Saenggakui Namu Press.Google Scholar

The National Institute of the Korean Language. 2010a. Everything You Wanted to Know about the Korean Language. Seoul: NIKL Press.Google Scholar

The National Institute of the Korean Language. 2010b. The Korean Alphabet, Hangeul. Seoul: NIKL Press.Google Scholar

The National Institute of the Korean Language. 2014. Appreciating Our Language. Seoul: NIKL Press.Google Scholar

The National Institute of the Korean Language. 2018. Handbook of Hangeul Spelling and Standard Lexicon of the Korean Language [한글 맞춤법∙표준어 규정 해설]. Seoul: NIKL Press.Google Scholar

The National Institute for the Korean Language. 2018. Annual Report of National Institute for the Korean Language. Seoul: NIKL Press.Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013. PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-Year-Olds Know and What They Can Do with What They Know. Geneva: OECD.Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2014. Education at a Glance (EAG) 2014. Geneva: OECD.Google Scholar

Rhee, Young Hoon. 2007. The Story of Korea [대한민국 이야기]. Seoul: Giparang.Google Scholar

Sohn, Ho-min, and Cheon, Sang Yee. 2013. Essentials of Korean Culture [한국문화의 이해]. Seoul: Korea University Press.Google Scholar

Yim, Songja. 2014. The literacy education policy and the 5-year-plan to eradicate illiteracy during the Syngman Rhee regime. The Soosun Historical Association Journal [史林] 50: 35–66.Google Scholar