Collier, Jane and Yanagisako, Sylvia. 1989. Gender and Kinship: Toward a Unified Analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Delaney, Carol. 1986. “The Meaning of Paternity and the Virgin Birth Debate.” Man 21(3): 494–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delaney, Carol. 1991. The Seed and the Soil: Gender and Cosmology in Turkish Village Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Delaney, Carol. 1998. Abraham on Trial: The Social Legacy of Biblical Myth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delaney, Carol. 2004. Investigating Culture: An Experiential Introduction to Anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Franklin, Sarah. 1995. “Postmodern Procreation: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, ed. Ginsburg, Faye D. and Rapp, Rayna, 323–345. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Franklin, Sarah. 2001. “Biologization Revisited: Kinship Theory in the Context of New Biologies.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Franklin, Sarah and McKinnon, Susan, 302–326. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howell, Signe. 2001. “Self-Conscious Kinship: Some Contested Values in Norwegian Transnational Adoption.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Franklin, Sarah and McKinnon, Susan, 203–223. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leach, Edmund. 1967. “Virgin Birth.” Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 39–49.Google Scholar

McLennan, J. F. 1896. Studies in Ancient History. London: Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronislaw. [1916]. 1954. “Baloma: Spirits of the Dead in the Trobriand Islands.” In Magic, Science and Religion. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1927. The Father in Primitive Society. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench and Trubner.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronislaw. [1929]. 1932. The Sexual Life of Savages in North-Western Melanesia. London: George Routledge and Sons.Google Scholar

Meeker, Michael. 1970. The Black Sea Turks: A Study of Honor, Descent and Marriage. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Montague, M. F. Ashley. 1937 [1974]. Coming into Being among the Australian Aborigines. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1871. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity in the Human Family. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 17. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar

Rapp, Rayna, Heath, Deborah and Taussig, Karen-Sue. 2001. “Genealogical Dis-Ease: Where Hereditary Abnormality, Biomedical Explanation and Family Responsibility Meet.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Franklin, Sarah and McKinnon, Susan, 384–410. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, David. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Schneider, David. 1972. “What Is Kinship All About?” In Kinship Studies in the Morgan Centennial Year, ed. Reining, P., 3–63. Washington DC: The Anthropological Society.Google Scholar

Shaw, Alison and Raz, Aviad. 2015. Cousin Marriage: Between Tradition, Genetic Risk and Cultural Change. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Weston, Kath. 1990. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Akin, David W. 2013. Colonialism, Maasina Rule, and the Origins of Malaitan Kastom. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. 1981 [1934–1935]. Discourse in the Novel. In The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin, ed. Holquist, Michael, 259–422. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Bamford, Sandra. 2007. Biology Unmoored: Melanesian Reflections on Life and Biotechnology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamford, Sandra and Leach, James, eds. 2009. Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. A. 1962. “African Models in the New Guinea Highlands.” Man 62 (Jan.): 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, J. A. 1967. “Genealogies.” In The Craft of Social Anthropology, ed. Epstein, A. L., 101–127. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Basso, Keith. 1996. Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Bateson, Gregory. 1979. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar

Bayliss-Smith, Tim. 2014. “Colonialism As Shell-Shock: W. H. R. Rivers’s Explanations for Depopulation in Melanesia.” In The Ethnographic Experiment: A. M. Hocart and W. H. R. Rivers in Island Melanesia, 1908, ed. Hviding, Edvard and Berg, Cato, 179–213. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar

Beasley, Edward. 2010. The Victorian Reinvention of Race: New Racisms and the Problem of Grouping in the Human Sciences. New York/Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beidelman, Thomas O. 1974. “Sir Edward Evan Evans-Pritchard (1902–1973): An Appreciation.” Anthropos 69(3/4): 553–567.Google Scholar

Beidelman, Thomas O. 1982. Colonial Evangelism: A Socio-historical Study of an East African Mission at the Grassroots. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Beidelman, Thomas O. 1986. Moral Imagination in Kaguru Modes of Thought. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Beidelman, Thomas O. 2010. “John Middleton (1921–2009).” Africa 80(1): 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beidelman, Thomas O. 2012. The Culture of Colonialism the Cultural Subjection of Ukaguru. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, Judith A. 2014. “A Vanishing People or a Vanishing Discourse? W. H. R. Rivers’s ‘Psychological Factor’ and Depopulation in the Solomon Islands and the New Hebrides.” In The Ethnographic Experiment: A. M. Hocart and W. H. R. Rivers in Island Melanesia, 1908, ed. Hviding, Edvard and Berg, Cato, 214–251. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar

Berg, Cato. 2014. “The Genealogical Method: Vella Lavella Reconsidered.” In The Ethnographic Experiment: A. M. Hocart and W. H. R. Rivers in Island Melanesia, 1908, ed. Hviding, Edvard and Berg, Cato, 108–131. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar

Bouquet, Mary. 1996. “Family Trees and Their Affinities: The Visual Imperative of the Genealogical Method.” Man (n.s.) 2(1): 43–66.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1962. “Célibat et condition paysanne.” Études rurales 5–6 (April–Sept.): 32–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cannell, Fenella. 2011. “English Ancestors: The Moral Possibilities of Popular Genealogy.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17(3): 462–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carsten, Janet. 1995. “The Politics of Forgetting: Migration, Kinship and Memory on the Periphery of the Southeast Asian State.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 1: 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carsten, Janet. 1997. The Heat of the Hearth: The Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carsten, Janet. ed. 2007. Ghosts of Memory: Essays on Remembrance and Relatedness. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carsten, Janet. 2011. “Substance and Relationality: Blood in Contexts.” Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carsten, Janet. 2013. “Introduction: Blood Will Out.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19, Issue Supplement: S1–S23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chelcea, Liviu. 2003. “Ancestors, Domestic Groups, and the Socialist State: Housing Nationalization and Restitution in Romania.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 45: 714–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chelcea, Liviu. 2016. “Kinship of Paper: Genealogical Charts As Bureaucratic Documents.” Po-LAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 39(2): 79–90.Google Scholar

Coley, Noel G. 2001. “Early Blood Chemistry in Britain and France.” Clinical Chemistry 47(12): 2166–2178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Darré, Richard Walther. 1930. Neuadel aus Blut und Boden. Munich: Lehmanns.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. (1859) 1964. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Facsimile of the first edition, with an introduction by Ernst Mayr. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, Charles. 1868. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. 2 v. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. 2v. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. 1881. The Formation of Vegetable Mould through the Action of Worms: With Observations on Their Habits. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dresch, Paul. 1988. “Segmentation: Its Roots in Arabia and Its Flowering Elsewhere.” Cultural Anthropology 3(1): 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkheim, Émile. 1898a. “III. La Famille. [Review of] Prof. J. Kohler. Zur Urgeschichte der Ehe. Totemismus, Gruppenehe, Mutterrecht. (Contribution à l’histoire primitive du mariage. Totémisme, mariage collectif, droit maternel.) Stuttgart, Entke, 1 vol. in-8vo.” L’année sociologique 1(1896–1897): 306–319.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Émile. 1898b. “L’individualisme et les intellectuels.” Revue bleue, 4e série, 10: 7–13.Google Scholar

Edwards, Jeanette. 2000. Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Jeanette. 2005. “‘Make-up’: Bringing Out Persons in New Reproductive and Genetic Technologies.” Ethnos 70(3): 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eggan, Fred. 1963. “The Hopi and the Lineage Principle.” In Social Structure: Studies Presented to A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, ed. Fortes, Meyer, 121–144. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar

Elkin, A. P. [Adolphus Peter]. 1956. “A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, 1880–1955.” Oceania 26(4): 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellen, Roy F. 1977. “Polythetic Classification.” Man (n.s.) 12(1): 177.Google Scholar

Engels, Friedrich. 1887 [1845]. The Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844. Translated by Florence Kelley Wischnewetsky. New York: J. W. Lovell.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1933–1935. “The Nuer: Tribe and Clan.” Sudan Notes and Records 16(1) [1933]: 1–53; 17(1) [1934]: 1–57; 18(1) [1935]: 37–87.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1940. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1946. “[Review of] The Dynamics of Clanship among the Tallensi.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies [University of London] 11(4): 906–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1949. The Sanusi of Cyrenaica. London/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1950. “Kinship and the Local Community among the Nuer.” In African Systems of Kinship and Marriage, ed. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. and Forde, D., 360–391. London: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1973. “Some Reminiscences and Reflections on Fieldwork.” Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 4: 1–2.Google Scholar

Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 1999. “‘Communities of Blood’: The Natural History of Kinship in Nineteenth-century America.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 41(2): 215–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 2004. “The Geography of Descent.” Proceedings of the British Academy 125: 311–364.Google Scholar

Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 2013. “Placing the Dead: The Kinship of Free Men in Pre- and Post-Civil War America.” In Vital Relations: Kinship and the Critique of Modernity, ed. Cannell, Fenella and McKinnon, Susan, 179–216. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar

Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 2014. “Bodies, Words, and Works: Charles Darwin and Lewis Henry Morgan on Human–Animal Relations.” In America’s Darwin: Darwinian Theory and U.S. Culture, 1859–Present, ed. Gianquitto, Tina and Fisher, Lydia, 265–301. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar

Firth, Raymond. 1936. We the Tikopia. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Firth, Raymond. 1956. “Alfred Reginald Radcliffe-Brown, 1881–1955.” Proceedings of the British Academy 42: 286–302.Google Scholar

Firth, Raymond. 1957. “A Note on Descent Groups in Polynesia.” Man 57(Jan.): 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Firth, Raymond. 1990. “Sex and Slander in Tikopia Song: Public Antagonism and Private Intrigue.” Oral Tradition 5(2–3): 219–240.Google Scholar

Fortes, Meyer. 1944. “The Significance of Descent in Tale Social Structure.” Africa 14(7): 362–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortes, Meyer. 1949. “Time and Social Structure: An Ashanti Case Study.” In Social Structure: Studies Presented to A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, ed. Fortes, M., 54–84. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Fortes, Meyer. 1953. “The Structure of Unilineal Descent Groups.” American Anthropologist 55(1): 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortes, Meyer. 1955. “Radcliffe-Brown’s Contributions to the Study of Social Organization.” British Journal of Sociology 6(1): 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortes, Meyer. 1978. “An Anthropologist’s Apprenticeship.” Annual Review of Anthropology 7: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortes, Meyer. 1979. “Preface.” In Segmentary Lineage Systems Reconsidered, ed. Holý, Ladislav, vii–xii. The Queen’s University Papers in Social Anthropology, 4. Belfast: The Queen’s University.Google Scholar

Fortes, Meyer and Evans-Pritchard, E. E., eds. 1940. African Political Systems. London/New York: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute.Google Scholar

Fox, James J. 1971. “Sister’s Child as Plant: Metaphors in an Idiom of Consanguinity.” In Rethinking Kinship and Marriage, ed. Needham, Rodney, 219–252. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Frémont, Armand. 1992. “La terre.” In Les lieux de mémoire, III. Les Frances, 2. Traditions, ed. Nora, Pierre, 18–55. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Frölich, Gustav, Spöttel, Walter and Tänzer, Ernst. 1929. Wollkunde: Bildung und Eigenschaften der Wolle. Berlin: J. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galton, Francis. 1901. “The Possible Improvement of the Human Breed under the Existing Conditions of Law and Sentiment.” Man 1: 161–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, Helen. 2008. “The Origin of Kinship in Oceania: Lewis Henry Morgan and Lorimer Fison.” Oceania 78(2): 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, Helen. 2009. “‘By the Facts We Add to Our Store’: Lorimer Fison, Lewis Henry Morgan and the Spread of Kinship Studies in Australia.” Oceania 79(3): 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gifford, Edward Winslow. 1926. “Miwok Lineages and the Political Unit in Aboriginal California.” American Anthropologist (n.s.) 28(2): 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gifford, Edward Winslow. 1929. Tongan Society. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin, 61. Honolulu, HI: The Museum.Google Scholar

Gifford, Edward Winslow. 1944. “Miwok Lineages.” American Anthropologist 46(3): 376–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gough, Kathleen. 1971. “Nuer Kinship: A Re-examination.” In The Translation of Culture: Essays to E. E. Evans Pritchard, ed. Beidelman, T. O., 79–121. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Graeber, David. 1995. “Dancing with Corpses Reconsidered: An Interpretation of Famadihana (in Arivonimamo, Madagascar).” American Ethnologist 22(2): 258–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guerreau-Jalabert, Anita. 2013. “Flesh and Blood in Medieval Language about Kinship.” In Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present, ed. Johnson, Christopher H., Jussen, Bernhard, Sabean, David Warren and Teuscher, Simon, 61–82. New York/Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar

Haddon, A. C. 1922. “Dr. W. H. R. Rivers, F.R.S.” Nature 109(2746) [June 17]: 786–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Head, Henry. 1922. “W. H. R. Rivers, M.D., D.Sc., F.R.S.: An Appreciation.” The British Medical Journal, June 17: 977–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Ruth. 2015. “The Blood of Others: Breeding Plants, Animals, and White People in the Spanish Atlantic.” In The Cultural Politics of Blood, 1500–1900, ed. Coles, Kimberly Anne, Bauer, Ralph, Nunes, Zita and Peterson, Carla L., 45–64. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hocart, Arthur M. 1937. “Kinship Systems.” Anthropos 32 (3/4): 545–551.Google Scholar

Holý, Ladislav, ed. 1979. Segmentary Lineage Systems Reconsidered. Queen’s University Papers in Social Anthropology, 4. Belfast: Queen’s University.Google Scholar

Holý, Ladislav, 1996. Anthropological Perspectives on Kinship. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, Sharon E. 1996. Nuer Dilemmas: Coping with Money, War, and the State. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, Sharon E. 2000. “Identity and Substance: The Broadening Base of Relatedness among the Nuer of Southern Sudan.” In Cultures of Relatedness, ed. Carsten, Janet, 55–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ingold, Tim. 2000. “Ancestry, Generation, Substance, Memory, Land.” In The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, 132–51. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith. 1978. “When Is Genealogy History? Wolof Genealogies in Comparative Perspective.” American Ethnologist 5(4): 651–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irvine, Judith. 1989. “When Talk Isn’t Cheap: Language and Political Economy.” American Ethnologist 16(2): 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Douglas H. 1989. “Political Ecology in the Upper Nile: The Twentieth Century Expansion of the Pastoral ‘Common Economy’.” Journal of African History 30(3): 463–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Douglas H. 1994. Nuer Prophets: A History of Prophecy from the Upper Nile in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. 1991. “The Genesis of the Family Tree.” I Tatti Studies: Essays in the Renaissance 4(1): 105–129.Google Scholar

Kolshus, Thorgeir S. 2011. “The Technology of Ethnography: An Empirical Argument against the Repatriation of Historical Accounts.” Journal de la Société des Océanistes 133(2): 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolshus, Thorgeir S. 2014. “A House upon Pacific Sand: W. H. R. Rivers and His 1908 Ethnographic Survey Work.” In The Ethnographic Experiment: A. M. Hocart and W. H. R. Rivers in Island Melanesia, 1908, ed. Hviding, Edvard and Berg, Cato, 155–178. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar

Kroeber, Alfred. 1909. “Classificatory Systems of Relationship.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 39(January–June): 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuper, Adam. 1982. “Lineage Theory: A Critical Retrospect.” Annual Review of Anthropology 11: 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuper, Adam. 2005. “Alternative Histories of British Social Anthropology.” Social Anthropology 13(1): 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langham, Ian. 1981. The Building of British Social Anthropology: W. H. R. Rivers and His Cambridge Disciples in the Development of Kinship Studies, 1898–1931. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leach, Edmund R. 1958. “Concerning Trobriand Clans and the Kinship Category ‘Tabu’.” In The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups, ed. Goody, Jack, 120–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leach, James. 2003. Creative Land: Place and Procreation on the Rai Coast of Papua New Guinea. New York/Oxford: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Littlejohn, James. 1960. “The Temne House.” Sierra Leone Studies (n.s.) 14(December): 63–79.Google Scholar

Lock, Margaret. 1993. Encounters with Aging: Mythologies of Menopause in Japan and North America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lowie, Robert H. 1920. Primitive Society. New York: Boni and Liveright.Google Scholar

Lubbock, John. 1872. “On the Development of Relationships.” Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 1: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGovern, Mike. 2012. “Life during Wartime: Aspirational Kinship and the Management of Insecurity.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18(4): 735–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKinnon, Susan. 1999. “Domestic Exceptions: Evans-Pritchard and the Creation of Nuer Patrilineality and Equality.” Cultural Anthropology 15: 35–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLennan, John Ferguson. 1876. Studies in Ancient History. London: B. Quaritch.Google Scholar

Maine, Henry Sumner. 1861. Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society, and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Malik, Asiya, Thomas, Todne and Wellman, Rose, eds. 2017. New Directions in Spiritual Kinship: Sacred Ties across the Abrahamic Religions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1929. The Sexual Life of Savages in North-Western Melanesia. London: G. Routledge.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1930. “Kinship.” Man 30(February): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marques, Ana Claudia. 2013. “Founders, Ancestors, and Enemies: Memory, Family, Time, and Space in the Pernambuco Sertão.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19(4): 716–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, William. 1787. The Rural Economy of Norfolk. 2 v. London: T. Cadell.Google Scholar

Marshall, William. 1790. The Rural Economy of the Midland Counties. 2 v. London: G. Nicol.Google Scholar

Matthey, Piero [introduction and selection]. 1996. “A Glimpse of Evans-Pritchard through His Correspondence with Lowie and Kroeber.” Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 27(1): 21–45.Google Scholar

Mauss, Marcel. 1923. “W.R.H. Rivers.” Revue d’ethnographie et des traditions populaires 4(13): 1–7.Google Scholar

Metcalf, Peter. 2010. The Life of the Longhouse: An Archaeology of Ethnicity. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Middleton, John. 1960. Lugbara Religion: Ritual and Authority among an East African People. London/New York: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute.Google Scholar

Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1851. League of the Ho-dé-no-sau-nee, or Iroquois. Rochester, NY: Sage & Brother.Google Scholar

Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1868. The American Beaver and His Works. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar

Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1871. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 17. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar

Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1877. Ancient Society, or Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1881. Houses and House-life of the American Aborigines. U.S. Geological Survey, Contributions to North American Ethnology, 4. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Mosko, Mark S. 2009. “The Fractal Yam: Botanical Imagery and Human Agency in the Trobriands.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15(4): 679–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myhre, Knut Christian. 2014. “The Multiple Meanings of Moongo: On the Conceptual Character of Doorways and Backbones in Kilimanjaro.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 20(3): 505–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nave, Carmen. 2016. “One Family: Defining Kinship in the Neighbourhoods of Kumasi, Ghana.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 22(4): 826–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Needham, Rodney. 1971a. “Introduction.” In Rethinking Kinship and Marriage, ed. Needham, Rodney, xiii–cxvii. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Needham, Rodney. 1971b. “Remarks on the Analysis of Kinship and Marriage.” In Rethinking Kinship and Marriage, ed. Needham, Rodney, 1–34. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Needham, Rodney. 1975. “Polythetic Classification: Convergence and Consequences.” Man (n.s.) 10(3): 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, William Max. 2010. “Making Men: Enlightenment Ideas of Racial Engineering.” American Historical Review 115(5): 1364–1394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nirenberg, David. 2009. “Was There Race before Modernity? The Example of ‘Jewish’ Blood in Late Medieval Spain.” In The Origins of Racism in the West, ed. Eliav-Feldon, Miriam, Isaac, Benjamin and Ziegler, Joseph, 232–264. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Orel, Vítĕzslav. 2009. “The ‘Useful Questions of Heredity’ before Mendel.” Journal of Heredity 100(4): 421–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Orel, V. and Wood, R. J.. 1998. “Empirical Genetic Laws Published in Brno before Mendel Was Born.” Journal of Heredity 89: 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, Mary. 2005. “Introduction: Reclaiming Paradigms Lost.” Australian Journal of Anthropology 16(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peluso, Nancy Lee. 1996. “Fruit Trees and Family Trees in an Anthropogenic Rainforest: Property Rights, Ethics of Access, and Environmental Change in Indonesia.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 38(3): 510–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, Emrys L. 1960. “The Proliferation of Segments in the Lineage of the Bedouin of Cyrenaica.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 90(1): 29–53.Google Scholar

Peters, Emrys L. 1967. “Some Structural Aspects of the Feud among the Camel-Herding Bedouin of Cyrenaica.” Africa 37(3): 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pietsch, Theodore W. 2012. Trees of Life: A Visual History of Evolution. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pina-Cabral, João de. 1989. “L’héritage de Maine: Repenser les catégories descriptives dans l'étude de la famille en Europe.” Ethnologie française 19: 329–340.Google Scholar

Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1930–1931. “The Social Organization of Australian Tribes.” Oceania 1(1[1930]): 34–63; 1(2[1930]): 206–246; 1(3[1930]): 322–341; 1(4[1931]): 426–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1931. “The Present Position of Anthropological Studies.” British Association for the Advancement of Science Report of the Centenary Meeting, London, September 23–30, 1931. London: Office of the British Association.Google Scholar

Richards, Audrey I. 1941. “A Problem of Anthropological Approach.” Bantu Studies 15(March): 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1899a. “Contributions to Comparative Psychology [from] Torres Straits: General Account and Observations on Vision, etc.” Journal of the Anthropological Institute 29(1/2): 219–221.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1899b. Two New Departures in Anthropological Method.” Report of the 69th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 879–880. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1900. “A Genealogical Method of Collecting Social and Vital Statistics.” Journal of the Anthropological Institute 30: 74–82.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1901a. “On the Functions of the Maternal Uncle in Torres Strait.” Man 1: 171–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1901b. “On the Functions of the Son-in-Law and Brother-in-Law in Torres Strait.” Man 1: 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1904. Reports of the Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to Torres Straits, IV: Sociology, Magic, and Religion of the Western Islanders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1907. “On the Origin of the Classificatory System of Relationships.” In Anthropological Essays Presented to Edward Burnett Tylor in Honour of His 75th Birthday Oct. 2, 1907, ed. Balfour, H., 309–323. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1908. Reports of the Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to Torres Straits, VI: Sociology, Magic, and Religion of the Eastern Islanders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1910. “The Genealogical Method of Anthropological Inquiry.” The Sociological Review 3: 1–12. (Republished the same year as: “La méthode généalogique dans les enquêtes anthropologiques.” Revue d’ethnographie et de sociologie 1(8–10): 201–209.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1914a. Kinship and Social Organisation. London: Constable.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1914b. The History of Melanesian Society. 2v. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1917. “The Government of Subject Peoples.” In Science and the Nation: Essays by Cambridge Graduates, ed. Seward, Albert C., 302–328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1922. “The Psychology of Depopulation.” In Essays on the Depopulation of Melanesia, ed. Rivers, W. H. R., 84–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rivière, Peter. 1993. “The Amerindianization of Descent and Affinity.” L’Homme 33(126–128): 507–516.Google Scholar

Ryder, Michael L. 1983. Sheep and Man. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Sabean, David Warren and Teuscher, Simon. 2013. “Introduction.” In Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present, ed. Johnson, Christopher H., Jussen, Bernhard, Sabean, David Warren and Teuscher, Simon, 1–17. New York/Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar

Sahlins, Marshall D. 1965. “On the Ideology and Composition of Descent Groups.” Man 65(Jul.–Aug.): 104–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sahlins, Marshall D. 2013. What Kinship Is – and Is Not. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salas Carreño, Guillermo. 2016. “Places Are Kin: Food, Cohabitation, and Sociality in the Southern Peruvian Andes.” Anthropological Quarterly 89(3): 813–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, David M. 1972. “What Is Kinship All About?” In Kinship Studies in the Morgan Centennial Year, ed. Reining, Priscilla, 32–63. Washington DC: The Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar

Schneider, David M. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shryock, Andrew. 1997. Nationalism and the Genealogical Imagination: Oral History and Textual Authority in Tribal Jordan. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shryock, Andrew. forthcoming. “Dialogues of Three: Making Sense of Patterns That Outlast Events.” In The Scandal of Continuity: Form, Duration and Difference, ed. Scheele, Judith and Shryock, Andrew. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Stocking, George W., Jr. 1995. After Tylor: British Social Anthropology, 1888–1951. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn. 2014. “Reading Relations Backwards.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20(1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teuscher, Simon. 2013. “Flesh and Blood in the Treatises on the Arbor Consanguinitatis (Thirteenth to Sixteenth Centuries).” In Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present, ed. Johnson, Christopher H., Jussen, Bernhard, Sabean, David Warren and Teuscher, Simon, 83–104. New York/Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar

Thompson, Edward P. 1967. “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism.” Past and Present 38(1): 56–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thornton, Thomas F. 2008. Being and Place among the Tlingit. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Trautmann, Thomas R. 2001. “The Whole History of Kinship Terminology in Three Chapters: Before Morgan, Morgan, and after Morgan.” Anthropological Theory 1(2): 268–287. (See Trautmann 2008: Appendix 3.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trautmann, Thomas R. 2008 [1987]. Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship. With a new introduction and appendices by the author. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Trautmann, Thomas R., Feeley-Harnik, Gillian and Mitani, John. 2011. “Deep Kinship.” In Deep History: The Architecture of Past and Present, ed. Shryock, Andrew and Smail, Daniel Lord, 160–188. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Wood, Roger J. and Orel, Vítĕzslav. 2001. Genetic Prehistory in Selective Breeding: A Prelude to Mendel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Michael W. 2004. Malinowski: Odyssey of an Anthropologist. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Young, Michael W. 2011. “Malinowski’s Last Word on the Anthropological Approach to Language.” Pragmatics 21(1): 1–22.Google Scholar

Aiyyappan, A. 1934. “Cross-Cousin and Uncle–Niece Marriages in South India.” In Congrès International des Sciences Anthropologiques et Ethnosociologiques. Compte-rendu de la Première Session. London: Institut Royal d’Anthropologie.Google Scholar

Annoussamy, David. 2003. “Le mariage entre oncle et nièce dans le sud de l’Inde.” In Etudes en hommage à Eugène Schaeffer, ed. Bourdeaux, Gauthier and Berthier, Susy, 63–75. Paris: Emile Bruylant.Google Scholar

Appadurai, Arjun. 1981. “Gastro-Politics in Hindu South Asia.” American Ethnologist 8(3): 494–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appadurai, Arjun. 1985. “Gratitude As a Social Mode in South India.” Ethos 13(3): 236–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arumugam, Indira. 2011. Kinship as Citizenship: State Formation, Sovereignty and Political Ethics among the Kallars in Central Tamil Nadu. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Anthropology of the London School of Economics.Google Scholar

Beck, E. F. Brenda. 1972. Peasant Society in Koṅku: A Study of Right and Left Subcastes in South India. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Beck, E. F. Brenda. 1974. “The Kin Nucleus in Tamil Folklore.” In Beck, B., Issue 7 of Michigan Papers on South and Southeast Asia, 1–27, Center for South and Southeast Asia Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Caldwell, Robert. 1856. A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South Indian Family of Languages. London: Harrison.Google Scholar

Clark-Decès, . 2014. The Right Spouse: Preferential Marriages in Tamil Nadu. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, Jane F. and Yanagisako, Sylvia J.. 1987. “Toward a Unified Analysis of Gender and Kinship.” In Gender and Kinship: Essays toward a Unified Analysis, ed. Collier, Jane F. and Yanagisako, Sylvia J., 14–50. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

di Leonardo, Micaela. 1979. “Methodology and Misinterpretation of Women’s Status in Kinship Studies: A Case Study of Goodenough and the Definition of Marriage.” American Ethnologist 6(4): 627–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumont, Louis. 1953. “The Dravidian Kinship Terminology As an Expression of Marriage.” Man 53: 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumont, Louis. 1980. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dumont, Louis. 1983. Affinity As a Value: Marriage Alliance in South India, with Comparative Essays on Australia. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dumont, Louis. 1986 [1957]. A South Indian Subcaste: Social Organization and Religion of the Pramalai Kallar. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Emeneau, B. Murray. 1953. Dravidian Kinship Terms. Language 29(3): 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, C. J. 1995. “The ‘Holy Family’ of Shiva in a South Indian Temple.” Social Anthropology 3(3): 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Good, Anthony. 1980. “Elder Sister’s Daughter Marriage in South Asia.” Journal of Anthropological Research 36(4): 474–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Good, Anthony. 1981. “Prescription, Preference and Practice: Marriage Patterns among the Kondaiyankottai Maravar of South India.” Man (n.s.) 16: 108–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Good, Anthony. 1996. “On the Non-existence of ‘Dravidian Kinship.’” Edinburgh Papers in South Asian Studies 6: 1–12.Google Scholar

Good, Anthony. 2000. “Power and Fertility: Divine Kinship in South India.” In Culture, Creation and Procreation, ed. Bock, Monika and Rao, Aparna, 323–356. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar

Hann, Katherine. 1985. “The Incidence of Relation Marriage in Karnataka, South India.” South Asia Research 5(1): 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harman, William P. 1989. The Sacred Marriage of a Hindu Goddess. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Hudson, Dennis. 1977. “Siva, Minaksi, Visnu: Reflections on a Popular Myth in Madurai.” The Indian Economic and Social History Review 14(1): 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kapadia, Karin. 1995. Siva and Her Sisters: Gender, Caste, and Class in Rural South India. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Translated from the French by James Harle Bell, John Richard von Sturmer and Rodney Needham. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1983. “Reflections on the Atom of Kinship.” In Structural Anthropology 2: 82–112. Translated by Monique Layton. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McCormack, William. 1958. “Sister’s Daughter Marriage in a Mysore Village.” Man in India 38(1): 34–48.Google Scholar

Mauss, Marcel. 1990. The Gift (The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies). Translated by W. D. Halls. Foreword by Mary Douglas. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Morgan, Henry Lewis. 1871. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 17. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar

Parkin, J. Robert. 1996a. “On Dumont’s ‘Affinal Terms’: Comment on Rudner.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 30: 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parkin, J. Robert. 1996b. “Genealogy and Category: An Operational View.” L’Homme 139: 87–108.Google Scholar

Rao, Kodanda M. 1973. “Rank Difference and Marriage Reciprocity in South India. An Aspect of the Implications of Elder Sister’s Daughter Marriage in a Fishing Village in Andhra.” In Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s) 7: 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reddy, Govinda. P. 1993. Marriage Practices in South India: Social and Biological Aspects of Consanguineous Unions. Madras: Department of Anthropology, University of Madras.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1907. “The Marriage of Cousins in India.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, July, 611–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1968 [1914]. Kinship and Organization. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Rubin, Gayle. 1975. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Toward an Anthropology of Women, ed. Reiter, Rayna R., 157–210. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Rudner, David West. 1990. “Inquest on Dravidian Kinship: Louis Dumont and the Essence of Marriage Alliance.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 24(2): 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheffler, Harold. 1977. “Kinship and Alliance in South India and Australia.” American Anthropologist 79: 869–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheffler, Harold. 1984. “Markedness and Extensions: The Tamil Case.” Man (n.s.) 19: 557–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, David M. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shulman, David Dean. 1980. Tamil Temple Myths: Sacrifice and Divine Marriage in the South Indian Saiva Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tamil Lexicon. 2007. Tamil Lexicon. University of Madras, 1924–1936. At http://dsal.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/tamil-lex/.Google Scholar

Trautmann, Thomas R. 1981. Dravidian Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Trawick, Margaret. 1990. Notes on Love in a Tamil Family. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tylor, Edward B. 1889. “On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions: Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent.” The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 18: 245–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uberoi, Patricia. 2006. “Hierarchy and Marriage: Alliance in Indian Kinship.” In Caste, Hierarchy and Individualism: Indian Critiques of Louis Dumont’s Contributions, ed. Khare, R. S., 159–163. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yalman, Nur. 1962. “The Structure of the Sinhalese Kindred: A Re-Examination of the Dravidian Terminology.” American Anthropologist (n.s.) 64(3): 548–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamford, Sandra. 2007. Biology Unmoored: Melanesian Reflections on Life and Biotechnology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birke, L., ed. 1980. Alice through the Microscope: The Power of Science over Women’s Lives. London: Virago.Google Scholar

Birke, L., 1982. “Cleaving the Mind: Speculations on Conceptual Dichotomies.” In Against Biological Determinism, ed. The Dialectics of Biology Group, 60–78. London: Allison & Busby.Google Scholar

Birke, L., 1986. Women, Feminism and Biology: The Feminist Challenge. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar

Bleier, Ruth. 1984. Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Bleier, Ruth. 1986. Feminist Approaches to Science. The Athene Series. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Boon, J. A. and Schneider, D. M.. 1974. “Kinship vis-à-vis Myth Contrasts in Lévi-Strauss’ Approaches to Cross-Cultural Comparison.” American Anthropologist 76(4): 799–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boston Women’s Health Collective. 1976. Our Bodies Ourselves. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Bott, E. 1957. Family and Social Network: Roles, Norms, and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Butler, J. P. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Clarke, M. 2008. “New Kinship, Islam, and the Liberal Tradition: Sexual Morality and New Reproductive Technology in Lebanon.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14(1): 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, J. F. and Yanagisako, S. J., eds. 1987. Gender and Kinship: Essays Toward a Unified Analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

De Beauvoir, S. 2014 [1949]. The Second Sex. Translated by Constance Borde and Sheila Malovany-Chevallier. London: Vintage [1974. Translated by H. M. Parshley. New York: Vintage].Google Scholar

Fausto-Sterling, A. 1985. Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Fausto-Sterling, A. 1987. “Society Writes Biology: Biology Constructs Gender.” Daedalus 61: 62–69.Google Scholar

Fausto-Sterling, A. 1989. “Life in the XY Corral.” Women’s Studies International Forum 12(3): 319–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Firestone, Shulamith. 1970. The Dialectic of Sex. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar

Firth, Raymond. 1956. Two Studies of Kinship in London. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Franklin, Sarah. 1995. “Science As Culture, Cultures of Science.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, Sarah. 2003. “Re-thinking Nature-Culture: Anthropology and the New Genetics.” Anthropological Theory 3(1): 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, Sarah. 2013. Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells and the Future of Kinship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, S. and Lock, M.. 2003. Remaking Life and Death: Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar

Fulwiley, Duana. 2011. The Enculturated Gene: Sickle Cell Health Politics and Biological Difference in West Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbon, S. and Novas, C., eds. 2007. Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences: Making Biologies and Identities. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Good, M. J. D. 1995. “Cultural Studies of Biomedicine: An Agenda for Research.” Social Science & Medicine 41(4): 461–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Good, M. J. D. 2001. “The Biotechnical Embrace.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 25(4): 395–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greer, Germaine. 1970. The Female Eunuch. London: MacGibbon & Kee.Google Scholar

Handler, Richard. 1995. Schneider on Schneider: The Conversion of the Jews and Other Anthropological Stories. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 1978a. “Animal Sociology and a Natural Economy of the Body Politic, Part I: A Political Physiology of Dominance.” Signs 4(1): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 1978b. “Animal Sociology and a Natural Economy of the Body Politic, Part II: The Past Is the Contested Zone: Human Nature and Theories of Production and Reproduction in Primate Behavior Studies.” Signs 4(1): 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 2007. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People and Significant Otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar

Helmreich, Stefan. 2009. Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Herschberger, Ruth. 1970. Adam’s Rib. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Hubbard, Ruth. 1988a. “Some Thoughts about the Masculinity of the Natural Sciences.” In Feminist Thought and the Structure of Knowledge, ed. Gergen, M., 1–15. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Hubbard, Ruth. 1988b. “Science, Facts, and Feminism.” Hypatia. Special Issue: Feminism and Science 3(1): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubbard, Ruth. 1990. The Politics of Women’s Biology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1983. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar

Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1995. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Kirksey, Eben, ed. 2014. The Multispecies Salon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Koedt, Anne. 2000 [1970]. “The Myth of the Vaginal Orgasm.” In Radical Feminism: A Documentary Reader, ed. Crow, Barbara A., 371–377. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Lamphere, Louise and Rosaldo, Michelle Z., eds. 1974. Woman, Culture, and Society. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Landecker, Hannah. 2011. “Food As Exposure: Nutritional Epigenetics and the New Metabolism.” BioSocieties 6(2): 167–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levin, Nadine. 2013. Enacting Molecular Complexity: Data and Health in the Metabonomics Laboratory. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Lock, M. and Nguyen, V. K.. 2010. An Anthropology of Biomedicine. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

MacCormack, Carole P. and Strathern, Marilyn, eds. 1980. Nature, Culture and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, Emily. 1987. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Martin, Emily. 1991. “The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male–Female Roles.” Signs 16(3): 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

M’charek, Amade. 2005. The Human Genome Project: An Ethnography of Scientific Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millett, Kate. 1970. Sexual Politics. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Morgan, Robin, ed. 1970. Sisterhood Is Powerful: An Anthology of Writings from the Women’s Liberation Movement. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Nelkin, Dorothy and Lindee, Susan. 1995. The DNA Mystique: The Gene As Cultural Icon. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar

Ortner, Sherry B. 1972. “Is Female to Male As Nature Is to Culture?” Feminist Studies 1(2): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parsons, Talcott. 1943. “The Kinship System of the Contemporary United States.” American Anthropologist 45(1): 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rapp, Rayna. 1999. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Reed, Evelyn. 1970. Problems of Women’s Liberation: A Marxist Approach. New York: Pathfinder Press.Google Scholar

Rich, Adrienne. 1976. Of Woman Born: Motherhood As Institution and Experience. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Rubin, Gayle. 1975. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Toward an Anthropology of Women, ed. Reiter, Rayna, 157–210. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Schneider, David Murray. [1968] 1980. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Schneider, David Murray. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn. 1980. “No Nature, No Culture: The Hagen Case.” In Nature, Culture and Gender, ed. MacCormack, C. and Strathern, M., 194–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn. 1992a Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn. 1992b After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn. [1974] 2016. Before and After Gender: Sexual Mythologies of Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: Hau Books.Google Scholar

Thompson, Charis. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Yanagisako, Sylvia J. and Collier, Jane F.. 1987. “Toward a Unified Analysis of Gender and Kinship.” In Gender and Kinship: Essays toward a Unified Analysis, ed. Collier, J. F. and Yanagisako, S. J., 14–52. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Young, Michael D. and Willmott, Peter. 1957. Family and Kinship in East London. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Bahloul, Joelle. 1996. The Architecture of Memory: A Jewish-Muslim Household in Colonial Algeria, 1937–1962. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bamford, Sandra. 2004. “Conceiving Relatedness: Non-Substantial Relations among the Kamea of Papua New Guinea.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 10(2): 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamford, Sandra. 2007. Biology Unmoored: Melanesian Reflections on Life and Biotechnology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamford, Sandra. 2009. “‘Family Trees’ among the Kamea of Papua New Guinea: A Non-Genealogical Approach to Imagining Relatedness.” In Kinship and Beyond: A Genealogical Model Reconsidered, ed. Bamford, S and Leach, J, 159–174. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Bloch, Maurice. 2005. “Commensality and Poisoning.” In Essays on Cultural Transmission, 45–59. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Bynum, Caroline Walker. 2007. Wonderful Blood: Theology and Practice in Late Medieval Northern Germany and Beyond. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Carsten, Janet. 1995. “The Substance of Kinship and the Heat of the Hearth: Feeding, Personhood and Relatedness among Malays of Pulau Langkawi.” American Ethnologist 22(2): 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carsten, Janet. 1997. The Heat of the Hearth: the Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carsten, Janet. 2000a. “Introduction: Cultures of Relatedness.” In Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, ed. Carsten, Janet, 1–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carsten, Janet. 2000b. “Knowing Where You’ve Come From: Ruptures and Continuities of Time and Kinship in Narratives of Adoption Reunions.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 6: 637–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carsten, Janet. 2004. After Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carsten, Janet. ed. 2007. Ghosts of Memory: Essays on Remembrance and Relatedness. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carsten, Janet. 2011. “Substance and Relationality: Blood in Contexts.” Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carsten, Janet. 2013a. “‘Searching for the Truth’: Tracing the Moral Properties of Blood in Malaysian Clinical Pathology Labs.” In Blood Will Out: Essays on Liquid Transfers and Flows, ed. Carsten, Janet, 130–148. Malden, MA: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carsten, Janet. ed. 2013b. Blood Will Out: Essays on Liquid Transfers and Flows. Malden, MA: Wiley. Also published as Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. Special Issue 19, May 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copeman, Jacob. 2013. “The Art of Bleeding: Memory, Martyrdom, and Portraits in Blood.” In Blood Will Out: Essays on Liquid Transfers and Flows, ed. Carsten, Janet, 149–171. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar

da Col, Giovanni. 2012. “The Poisoner and the Parasite: Cosmoeconomics, Fear, and Hospitality among Dechen Tibetans.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 18: S175–S195.Google Scholar

Das, Veena. 1995. “National Honour and Practical Kinship: Unwanted Women and Children.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, ed. Ginsburg, Faye D. and Rapp, Rayna, 212–233. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. 1975. Implicit Meanings: Essays in Anthropology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Edwards, Jeanette and Strathern, Marilyn. 2000. “Including Our Own.” In Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, ed. Carsten, Janet, 149–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Faubion, James, ed. 2001. The Ethics of Kinship: Ethnographic Enquiries. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Fontein, Joost and Harries, John. 2013. “Editorial. The Vitality and Efficacy of Human Substances.” Critical African Studies 5(3): 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortes, Meyer. 1969. Kinship and the Social Order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Foster, Robert J. 1990. “Nurture and Force-Feeding: Mortuary Feasting and the Construction of Collective Individuals in a New Ireland Society.” American Ethnologist 17(3): 431–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gow, Peter. 1991. Of Mixed Blood: Kinship and History in Peruvian Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keane, Webb. 1997. Signs of Recognition: Powers and Hazards of Representation in an Indonesian Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keane, Webb. 2003. “Semiotics and the Social Analysis of Material Things.” Language & Communication 23: 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambek, Michael. 2011. “Kinship As Gift and Theft: Acts of Succession in Mayotte and Ancient Israel.” American Ethnologist 38: 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCann, Colin. April 1, 2012. “What Baseball Does to the Soul.” The New York Times.Google Scholar

McKinley, Robert. 2001. “The Philosophy of Kinship: A Reply to Schneider’s Critique of the Study of Kinship.” In The Cultural Analysis of Kinship: The Legacy of David M. Schneider, ed. Feinberg, Richard and Ottenheimer, Martin, 131–167. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Martin, Emily. 2013. “Blood and the Brain.” In Blood Will Out: Essays on Liquid Transfers and Flows, ed. Carsten, Janet, 172–184. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar

Mayblin, Maya. 2013. “The Way Blood Flows: The Sacrificial Value of Intravenous Drip Use in Northeast Brazil.” In Blood Will Out: Essays on Liquid Transfers and Flows, ed. Carsten, Janet, 42–56. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar

Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1871. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Peletz, Michael. 2000. “Ambivalence in Kinship since the 1940s.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Franklin, Sarah and McKinnon, Susan, 413–444. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Sahlins, Marshall. 2013. What Kinship Is … and Is Not. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, David M. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shryock, Andrew. 2013. “It’s This, Not That: How Marshall Sahlins Solves Kinship.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3(2): 271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trautmann, Thomas, Feeley-Harnik, Gillian andMitani, John C.. 2011. “Deep Kinship.” In Deep History: The Architecture of Past and Present, ed. Shryock, Andrew and Smail, Daniel Lord, 160–188. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Tylor, Edward B. 1865. Researches into the Early History of Mankind and the Development of Civilization. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar

Verdery, Katharine. 1999. The Political Lives of Dead Bodies: Reburial and Postsocialist Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Weston, Kath. 2013. “Lifeblood, Liquidity, and Cash Transfusions: Beyond Metaphor in the Cultural Study of Finance.” In Blood Will Out: Essays on Liquid Transfers and Flows, ed. Carsten, Janet, 24–41. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar