Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:25:08.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Descent in Retrospect and Prospect

from Part I - Opening Frameworks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2019

By
Gillian Feeley-Harnik
Edited by
Sandra Bamford
Sandra Bamford
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship , pp. 51 - 87
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akin, David W. 2013. Colonialism, Maasina Rule, and the Origins of Malaitan Kastom. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981 [1934–1935]. Discourse in the Novel. In The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin, ed. Holquist, Michael, 259–422. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bamford, Sandra. 2007. Biology Unmoored: Melanesian Reflections on Life and Biotechnology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamford, Sandra and Leach, James, eds. 2009. Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. A. 1962. “African Models in the New Guinea Highlands.” Man 62 (Jan.): 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. A. 1967. “Genealogies.” In The Craft of Social Anthropology, ed. Epstein, A. L., 101–127. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Basso, Keith. 1996. Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1979. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Bayliss-Smith, Tim. 2014. “Colonialism As Shell-Shock: W. H. R. Rivers’s Explanations for Depopulation in Melanesia.” In The Ethnographic Experiment: A. M. Hocart and W. H. R. Rivers in Island Melanesia, 1908, ed. Hviding, Edvard and Berg, Cato, 179–213. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Beasley, Edward. 2010. The Victorian Reinvention of Race: New Racisms and the Problem of Grouping in the Human Sciences. New York/Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beidelman, Thomas O. 1974. “Sir Edward Evan Evans-Pritchard (1902–1973): An Appreciation.” Anthropos 69(3/4): 553–567.Google Scholar
Beidelman, Thomas O. 1982. Colonial Evangelism: A Socio-historical Study of an East African Mission at the Grassroots. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Beidelman, Thomas O. 1986. Moral Imagination in Kaguru Modes of Thought. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Beidelman, Thomas O. 2010. “John Middleton (1921–2009).” Africa 80(1): 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beidelman, Thomas O. 2012. The Culture of Colonialism the Cultural Subjection of Ukaguru. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Judith A. 2014. “A Vanishing People or a Vanishing Discourse? W. H. R. Rivers’s ‘Psychological Factor’ and Depopulation in the Solomon Islands and the New Hebrides.” In The Ethnographic Experiment: A. M. Hocart and W. H. R. Rivers in Island Melanesia, 1908, ed. Hviding, Edvard and Berg, Cato, 214–251. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Berg, Cato. 2014. “The Genealogical Method: Vella Lavella Reconsidered.” In The Ethnographic Experiment: A. M. Hocart and W. H. R. Rivers in Island Melanesia, 1908, ed. Hviding, Edvard and Berg, Cato, 108–131. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Bouquet, Mary. 1996. “Family Trees and Their Affinities: The Visual Imperative of the Genealogical Method.” Man (n.s.) 2(1): 43–66.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1962. “Célibat et condition paysanne.” Études rurales 5–6 (April–Sept.): 32–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2011. “English Ancestors: The Moral Possibilities of Popular Genealogy.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17(3): 462–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, Janet. 1995. “The Politics of Forgetting: Migration, Kinship and Memory on the Periphery of the Southeast Asian State.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 1: 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, Janet. 1997. The Heat of the Hearth: The Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, Janet. ed. 2007. Ghosts of Memory: Essays on Remembrance and Relatedness. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, Janet. 2011. “Substance and Relationality: Blood in Contexts.” Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, Janet. 2013. “Introduction: Blood Will Out.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19, Issue Supplement: S1–S23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chelcea, Liviu. 2003. “Ancestors, Domestic Groups, and the Socialist State: Housing Nationalization and Restitution in Romania.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 45: 714–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chelcea, Liviu. 2016. “Kinship of Paper: Genealogical Charts As Bureaucratic Documents.” Po-LAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 39(2): 79–90.Google Scholar
Coley, Noel G. 2001. “Early Blood Chemistry in Britain and France.” Clinical Chemistry 47(12): 2166–2178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darré, Richard Walther. 1930. Neuadel aus Blut und Boden. Munich: Lehmanns.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. (1859) 1964. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Facsimile of the first edition, with an introduction by Ernst Mayr. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1868. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. 2 v. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. 2v. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1881. The Formation of Vegetable Mould through the Action of Worms: With Observations on Their Habits. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresch, Paul. 1988. “Segmentation: Its Roots in Arabia and Its Flowering Elsewhere.” Cultural Anthropology 3(1): 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1898a. “III. La Famille. [Review of] Prof. J. Kohler. Zur Urgeschichte der Ehe. Totemismus, Gruppenehe, Mutterrecht. (Contribution à l’histoire primitive du mariage. Totémisme, mariage collectif, droit maternel.) Stuttgart, Entke, 1 vol. in-8vo.” L’année sociologique 1(1896–1897): 306–319.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1898b. “L’individualisme et les intellectuels.” Revue bleue, 4e série, 10: 7–13.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jeanette. 2000. Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Jeanette. 2005. “‘Make-up’: Bringing Out Persons in New Reproductive and Genetic Technologies.” Ethnos 70(3): 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggan, Fred. 1963. “The Hopi and the Lineage Principle.” In Social Structure: Studies Presented to A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, ed. Fortes, Meyer, 121–144. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Elkin, A. P. [Adolphus Peter]. 1956. “A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, 1880–1955.” Oceania 26(4): 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellen, Roy F. 1977. “Polythetic Classification.” Man (n.s.) 12(1): 177.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. 1887 [1845]. The Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844. Translated by Florence Kelley Wischnewetsky. New York: J. W. Lovell.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1933–1935. “The Nuer: Tribe and Clan.” Sudan Notes and Records 16(1) [1933]: 1–53; 17(1) [1934]: 1–57; 18(1) [1935]: 37–87.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1940. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1946. “[Review of] The Dynamics of Clanship among the Tallensi.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies [University of London] 11(4): 906–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1949. The Sanusi of Cyrenaica. London/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1950. “Kinship and the Local Community among the Nuer.” In African Systems of Kinship and Marriage, ed. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. and Forde, D., 360–391. London: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1973. “Some Reminiscences and Reflections on Fieldwork.” Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 4: 1–2.Google Scholar
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 1999. “‘Communities of Blood’: The Natural History of Kinship in Nineteenth-century America.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 41(2): 215–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 2004. “The Geography of Descent.” Proceedings of the British Academy 125: 311–364.Google Scholar
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 2013. “Placing the Dead: The Kinship of Free Men in Pre- and Post-Civil War America.” In Vital Relations: Kinship and the Critique of Modernity, ed. Cannell, Fenella and McKinnon, Susan, 179–216. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 2014. “Bodies, Words, and Works: Charles Darwin and Lewis Henry Morgan on Human–Animal Relations.” In America’s Darwin: Darwinian Theory and U.S. Culture, 1859–Present, ed. Gianquitto, Tina and Fisher, Lydia, 265–301. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Firth, Raymond. 1936. We the Tikopia. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Firth, Raymond. 1956. “Alfred Reginald Radcliffe-Brown, 1881–1955.” Proceedings of the British Academy 42: 286–302.Google Scholar
Firth, Raymond. 1957. “A Note on Descent Groups in Polynesia.” Man 57(Jan.): 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, Raymond. 1990. “Sex and Slander in Tikopia Song: Public Antagonism and Private Intrigue.” Oral Tradition 5(2–3): 219–240.Google Scholar
Fortes, Meyer. 1944. “The Significance of Descent in Tale Social Structure.” Africa 14(7): 362–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortes, Meyer. 1949. “Time and Social Structure: An Ashanti Case Study.” In Social Structure: Studies Presented to A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, ed. Fortes, M., 54–84. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fortes, Meyer. 1953. “The Structure of Unilineal Descent Groups.” American Anthropologist 55(1): 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortes, Meyer. 1955. “Radcliffe-Brown’s Contributions to the Study of Social Organization.” British Journal of Sociology 6(1): 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortes, Meyer. 1978. “An Anthropologist’s Apprenticeship.” Annual Review of Anthropology 7: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortes, Meyer. 1979. “Preface.” In Segmentary Lineage Systems Reconsidered, ed. Holý, Ladislav, vii–xii. The Queen’s University Papers in Social Anthropology, 4. Belfast: The Queen’s University.Google Scholar
Fortes, Meyer and Evans-Pritchard, E. E., eds. 1940. African Political Systems. London/New York: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Fox, James J. 1971. “Sister’s Child as Plant: Metaphors in an Idiom of Consanguinity.” In Rethinking Kinship and Marriage, ed. Needham, Rodney, 219–252. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Frémont, Armand. 1992. “La terre.” In Les lieux de mémoire, III. Les Frances, 2. Traditions, ed. Nora, Pierre, 18–55. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Frölich, Gustav, Spöttel, Walter and Tänzer, Ernst. 1929. Wollkunde: Bildung und Eigenschaften der Wolle. Berlin: J. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, Francis. 1901. “The Possible Improvement of the Human Breed under the Existing Conditions of Law and Sentiment.” Man 1: 161–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Helen. 2008. “The Origin of Kinship in Oceania: Lewis Henry Morgan and Lorimer Fison.” Oceania 78(2): 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Helen. 2009. “‘By the Facts We Add to Our Store’: Lorimer Fison, Lewis Henry Morgan and the Spread of Kinship Studies in Australia.” Oceania 79(3): 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, Edward Winslow. 1926. “Miwok Lineages and the Political Unit in Aboriginal California.” American Anthropologist (n.s.) 28(2): 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, Edward Winslow. 1929. Tongan Society. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin, 61. Honolulu, HI: The Museum.Google Scholar
Gifford, Edward Winslow. 1944. “Miwok Lineages.” American Anthropologist 46(3): 376–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, Kathleen. 1971. “Nuer Kinship: A Re-examination.” In The Translation of Culture: Essays to E. E. Evans Pritchard, ed. Beidelman, T. O., 79–121. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Graeber, David. 1995. “Dancing with Corpses Reconsidered: An Interpretation of Famadihana (in Arivonimamo, Madagascar).” American Ethnologist 22(2): 258–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerreau-Jalabert, Anita. 2013. “Flesh and Blood in Medieval Language about Kinship.” In Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present, ed. Johnson, Christopher H., Jussen, Bernhard, Sabean, David Warren and Teuscher, Simon, 61–82. New York/Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Haddon, A. C. 1922. “Dr. W. H. R. Rivers, F.R.S.” Nature 109(2746) [June 17]: 786–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, Henry. 1922. “W. H. R. Rivers, M.D., D.Sc., F.R.S.: An Appreciation.” The British Medical Journal, June 17: 977–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Ruth. 2015. “The Blood of Others: Breeding Plants, Animals, and White People in the Spanish Atlantic.” In The Cultural Politics of Blood, 1500–1900, ed. Coles, Kimberly Anne, Bauer, Ralph, Nunes, Zita and Peterson, Carla L., 45–64. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hocart, Arthur M. 1937. “Kinship Systems.” Anthropos 32 (3/4): 545–551.Google Scholar
Holý, Ladislav, ed. 1979. Segmentary Lineage Systems Reconsidered. Queen’s University Papers in Social Anthropology, 4. Belfast: Queen’s University.Google Scholar
Holý, Ladislav, 1996. Anthropological Perspectives on Kinship. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Sharon E. 1996. Nuer Dilemmas: Coping with Money, War, and the State. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, Sharon E. 2000. “Identity and Substance: The Broadening Base of Relatedness among the Nuer of Southern Sudan.” In Cultures of Relatedness, ed. Carsten, Janet, 55–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2000. “Ancestry, Generation, Substance, Memory, Land.” In The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, 132–51. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith. 1978. “When Is Genealogy History? Wolof Genealogies in Comparative Perspective.” American Ethnologist 5(4): 651–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith. 1989. “When Talk Isn’t Cheap: Language and Political Economy.” American Ethnologist 16(2): 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Douglas H. 1989. “Political Ecology in the Upper Nile: The Twentieth Century Expansion of the Pastoral ‘Common Economy’.” Journal of African History 30(3): 463–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Douglas H. 1994. Nuer Prophets: A History of Prophecy from the Upper Nile in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. 1991. “The Genesis of the Family Tree.” I Tatti Studies: Essays in the Renaissance 4(1): 105–129.Google Scholar
Kolshus, Thorgeir S. 2011. “The Technology of Ethnography: An Empirical Argument against the Repatriation of Historical Accounts.” Journal de la Société des Océanistes 133(2): 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolshus, Thorgeir S. 2014. “A House upon Pacific Sand: W. H. R. Rivers and His 1908 Ethnographic Survey Work.” In The Ethnographic Experiment: A. M. Hocart and W. H. R. Rivers in Island Melanesia, 1908, ed. Hviding, Edvard and Berg, Cato, 155–178. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred. 1909. “Classificatory Systems of Relationship.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 39(January–June): 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 1982. “Lineage Theory: A Critical Retrospect.” Annual Review of Anthropology 11: 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 2005. “Alternative Histories of British Social Anthropology.” Social Anthropology 13(1): 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langham, Ian. 1981. The Building of British Social Anthropology: W. H. R. Rivers and His Cambridge Disciples in the Development of Kinship Studies, 1898–1931. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, Edmund R. 1958. “Concerning Trobriand Clans and the Kinship Category ‘Tabu’.” In The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups, ed. Goody, Jack, 120–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leach, James. 2003. Creative Land: Place and Procreation on the Rai Coast of Papua New Guinea. New York/Oxford: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlejohn, James. 1960. “The Temne House.” Sierra Leone Studies (n.s.) 14(December): 63–79.Google Scholar
Lock, Margaret. 1993. Encounters with Aging: Mythologies of Menopause in Japan and North America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lowie, Robert H. 1920. Primitive Society. New York: Boni and Liveright.Google Scholar
Lubbock, John. 1872. “On the Development of Relationships.” Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 1: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGovern, Mike. 2012. “Life during Wartime: Aspirational Kinship and the Management of Insecurity.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18(4): 735–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Susan. 1999. “Domestic Exceptions: Evans-Pritchard and the Creation of Nuer Patrilineality and Equality.” Cultural Anthropology 15: 35–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLennan, John Ferguson. 1876. Studies in Ancient History. London: B. Quaritch.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. 1861. Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society, and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Malik, Asiya, Thomas, Todne and Wellman, Rose, eds. 2017. New Directions in Spiritual Kinship: Sacred Ties across the Abrahamic Religions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1929. The Sexual Life of Savages in North-Western Melanesia. London: G. Routledge.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1930. “Kinship.” Man 30(February): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marques, Ana Claudia. 2013. “Founders, Ancestors, and Enemies: Memory, Family, Time, and Space in the Pernambuco Sertão.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19(4): 716–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, William. 1787. The Rural Economy of Norfolk. 2 v. London: T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Marshall, William. 1790. The Rural Economy of the Midland Counties. 2 v. London: G. Nicol.Google Scholar
Matthey, Piero [introduction and selection]. 1996. “A Glimpse of Evans-Pritchard through His Correspondence with Lowie and Kroeber.” Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 27(1): 21–45.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1923. “W.R.H. Rivers.” Revue d’ethnographie et des traditions populaires 4(13): 1–7.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Peter. 2010. The Life of the Longhouse: An Archaeology of Ethnicity. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Middleton, John. 1960. Lugbara Religion: Ritual and Authority among an East African People. London/New York: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1851. League of the Ho-dé-no-sau-nee, or Iroquois. Rochester, NY: Sage & Brother.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1868. The American Beaver and His Works. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1871. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 17. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1877. Ancient Society, or Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1881. Houses and House-life of the American Aborigines. U.S. Geological Survey, Contributions to North American Ethnology, 4. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Mosko, Mark S. 2009. “The Fractal Yam: Botanical Imagery and Human Agency in the Trobriands.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15(4): 679–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myhre, Knut Christian. 2014. “The Multiple Meanings of Moongo: On the Conceptual Character of Doorways and Backbones in Kilimanjaro.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 20(3): 505–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nave, Carmen. 2016. “One Family: Defining Kinship in the Neighbourhoods of Kumasi, Ghana.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 22(4): 826–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, Rodney. 1971a. “Introduction.” In Rethinking Kinship and Marriage, ed. Needham, Rodney, xiii–cxvii. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Needham, Rodney. 1971b. “Remarks on the Analysis of Kinship and Marriage.” In Rethinking Kinship and Marriage, ed. Needham, Rodney, 1–34. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Needham, Rodney. 1975. “Polythetic Classification: Convergence and Consequences.” Man (n.s.) 10(3): 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, William Max. 2010. “Making Men: Enlightenment Ideas of Racial Engineering.” American Historical Review 115(5): 1364–1394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nirenberg, David. 2009. “Was There Race before Modernity? The Example of ‘Jewish’ Blood in Late Medieval Spain.” In The Origins of Racism in the West, ed. Eliav-Feldon, Miriam, Isaac, Benjamin and Ziegler, Joseph, 232–264. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orel, Vítĕzslav. 2009. “The ‘Useful Questions of Heredity’ before Mendel.” Journal of Heredity 100(4): 421–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orel, V. and Wood, R. J.. 1998. “Empirical Genetic Laws Published in Brno before Mendel Was Born.” Journal of Heredity 89: 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Mary. 2005. “Introduction: Reclaiming Paradigms Lost.” Australian Journal of Anthropology 16(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peluso, Nancy Lee. 1996. “Fruit Trees and Family Trees in an Anthropogenic Rainforest: Property Rights, Ethics of Access, and Environmental Change in Indonesia.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 38(3): 510–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Emrys L. 1960. “The Proliferation of Segments in the Lineage of the Bedouin of Cyrenaica.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 90(1): 29–53.Google Scholar
Peters, Emrys L. 1967. “Some Structural Aspects of the Feud among the Camel-Herding Bedouin of Cyrenaica.” Africa 37(3): 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietsch, Theodore W. 2012. Trees of Life: A Visual History of Evolution. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pina-Cabral, João de. 1989. “L’héritage de Maine: Repenser les catégories descriptives dans l'étude de la famille en Europe.” Ethnologie française 19: 329–340.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1930–1931. “The Social Organization of Australian Tribes.” Oceania 1(1[1930]): 34–63; 1(2[1930]): 206–246; 1(3[1930]): 322–341; 1(4[1931]): 426–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1931. “The Present Position of Anthropological Studies.” British Association for the Advancement of Science Report of the Centenary Meeting, London, September 23–30, 1931. London: Office of the British Association.Google Scholar
Richards, Audrey I. 1941. “A Problem of Anthropological Approach.” Bantu Studies 15(March): 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1899a. “Contributions to Comparative Psychology [from] Torres Straits: General Account and Observations on Vision, etc.” Journal of the Anthropological Institute 29(1/2): 219–221.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1899b. Two New Departures in Anthropological Method.” Report of the 69th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 879–880. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1900. “A Genealogical Method of Collecting Social and Vital Statistics.” Journal of the Anthropological Institute 30: 74–82.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1901a. “On the Functions of the Maternal Uncle in Torres Strait.” Man 1: 171–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1901b. “On the Functions of the Son-in-Law and Brother-in-Law in Torres Strait.” Man 1: 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1904. Reports of the Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to Torres Straits, IV: Sociology, Magic, and Religion of the Western Islanders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1907. “On the Origin of the Classificatory System of Relationships.” In Anthropological Essays Presented to Edward Burnett Tylor in Honour of His 75th Birthday Oct. 2, 1907, ed. Balfour, H., 309–323. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1908. Reports of the Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to Torres Straits, VI: Sociology, Magic, and Religion of the Eastern Islanders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1910. “The Genealogical Method of Anthropological Inquiry.” The Sociological Review 3: 1–12. (Republished the same year as: “La méthode généalogique dans les enquêtes anthropologiques.” Revue d’ethnographie et de sociologie 1(8–10): 201–209.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1914a. Kinship and Social Organisation. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1914b. The History of Melanesian Society. 2v. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1917. “The Government of Subject Peoples.” In Science and the Nation: Essays by Cambridge Graduates, ed. Seward, Albert C., 302–328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1922. “The Psychology of Depopulation.” In Essays on the Depopulation of Melanesia, ed. Rivers, W. H. R., 84–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rivière, Peter. 1993. “The Amerindianization of Descent and Affinity.” L’Homme 33(126–128): 507–516.Google Scholar
Ryder, Michael L. 1983. Sheep and Man. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sabean, David Warren and Teuscher, Simon. 2013. “Introduction.” In Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present, ed. Johnson, Christopher H., Jussen, Bernhard, Sabean, David Warren and Teuscher, Simon, 1–17. New York/Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall D. 1965. “On the Ideology and Composition of Descent Groups.” Man 65(Jul.–Aug.): 104–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall D. 2013. What Kinship Is – and Is Not. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas Carreño, Guillermo. 2016. “Places Are Kin: Food, Cohabitation, and Sociality in the Southern Peruvian Andes.” Anthropological Quarterly 89(3): 813–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, David M. 1972. “What Is Kinship All About?” In Kinship Studies in the Morgan Centennial Year, ed. Reining, Priscilla, 32–63. Washington DC: The Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar
Schneider, David M. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shryock, Andrew. 1997. Nationalism and the Genealogical Imagination: Oral History and Textual Authority in Tribal Jordan. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shryock, Andrew. forthcoming. “Dialogues of Three: Making Sense of Patterns That Outlast Events.” In The Scandal of Continuity: Form, Duration and Difference, ed. Scheele, Judith and Shryock, Andrew. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W., Jr. 1995. After Tylor: British Social Anthropology, 1888–1951. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2014. “Reading Relations Backwards.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20(1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teuscher, Simon. 2013. “Flesh and Blood in the Treatises on the Arbor Consanguinitatis (Thirteenth to Sixteenth Centuries).” In Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present, ed. Johnson, Christopher H., Jussen, Bernhard, Sabean, David Warren and Teuscher, Simon, 83–104. New York/Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward P. 1967. “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism.” Past and Present 38(1): 56–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Thomas F. 2008. Being and Place among the Tlingit. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R. 2001. “The Whole History of Kinship Terminology in Three Chapters: Before Morgan, Morgan, and after Morgan.” Anthropological Theory 1(2): 268–287. (See Trautmann 2008: Appendix 3.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R. 2008 [1987]. Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship. With a new introduction and appendices by the author. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R., Feeley-Harnik, Gillian and Mitani, John. 2011. “Deep Kinship.” In Deep History: The Architecture of Past and Present, ed. Shryock, Andrew and Smail, Daniel Lord, 160–188. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Roger J. and Orel, Vítĕzslav. 2001. Genetic Prehistory in Selective Breeding: A Prelude to Mendel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Michael W. 2004. Malinowski: Odyssey of an Anthropologist. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Michael W. 2011. “Malinowski’s Last Word on the Anthropological Approach to Language.” Pragmatics 21(1): 1–22.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×