Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:27:51.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The Anthropology of Biology: A Lesson from the New Kinship Studies

from Part I - Opening Frameworks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2019

By
Sarah Franklin
Edited by
Sandra Bamford
Sandra Bamford
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship , pp. 107 - 132
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bamford, Sandra. 2007. Biology Unmoored: Melanesian Reflections on Life and Biotechnology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birke, L., ed. 1980. Alice through the Microscope: The Power of Science over Women’s Lives. London: Virago.Google Scholar
Birke, L., 1982. “Cleaving the Mind: Speculations on Conceptual Dichotomies.” In Against Biological Determinism, ed. The Dialectics of Biology Group, 60–78. London: Allison & Busby.Google Scholar
Birke, L., 1986. Women, Feminism and Biology: The Feminist Challenge. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bleier, Ruth. 1984. Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bleier, Ruth. 1986. Feminist Approaches to Science. The Athene Series. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Boon, J. A. and Schneider, D. M.. 1974. “Kinship vis-à-vis Myth Contrasts in Lévi-Strauss’ Approaches to Cross-Cultural Comparison.” American Anthropologist 76(4): 799–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boston Women’s Health Collective. 1976. Our Bodies Ourselves. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bott, E. 1957. Family and Social Network: Roles, Norms, and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Butler, J. P. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2008. “New Kinship, Islam, and the Liberal Tradition: Sexual Morality and New Reproductive Technology in Lebanon.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14(1): 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, J. F. and Yanagisako, S. J., eds. 1987. Gender and Kinship: Essays Toward a Unified Analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
De Beauvoir, S. 2014 [1949]. The Second Sex. Translated by Constance Borde and Sheila Malovany-Chevallier. London: Vintage [1974. Translated by H. M. Parshley. New York: Vintage].Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A. 1985. Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A. 1987. “Society Writes Biology: Biology Constructs Gender.” Daedalus 61: 62–69.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A. 1989. “Life in the XY Corral.” Women’s Studies International Forum 12(3): 319–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firestone, Shulamith. 1970. The Dialectic of Sex. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Firth, Raymond. 1956. Two Studies of Kinship in London. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah. 1995. “Science As Culture, Cultures of Science.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Sarah. 2003. “Re-thinking Nature-Culture: Anthropology and the New Genetics.” Anthropological Theory 3(1): 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Sarah. 2013. Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells and the Future of Kinship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, S. and Lock, M.. 2003. Remaking Life and Death: Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Fulwiley, Duana. 2011. The Enculturated Gene: Sickle Cell Health Politics and Biological Difference in West Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, S. and Novas, C., eds. 2007. Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences: Making Biologies and Identities. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, M. J. D. 1995. “Cultural Studies of Biomedicine: An Agenda for Research.” Social Science & Medicine 41(4): 461–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Good, M. J. D. 2001. “The Biotechnical Embrace.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 25(4): 395–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greer, Germaine. 1970. The Female Eunuch. London: MacGibbon & Kee.Google Scholar
Handler, Richard. 1995. Schneider on Schneider: The Conversion of the Jews and Other Anthropological Stories. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1978a. “Animal Sociology and a Natural Economy of the Body Politic, Part I: A Political Physiology of Dominance.” Signs 4(1): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1978b. “Animal Sociology and a Natural Economy of the Body Politic, Part II: The Past Is the Contested Zone: Human Nature and Theories of Production and Reproduction in Primate Behavior Studies.” Signs 4(1): 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 2007. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People and Significant Otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Helmreich, Stefan. 2009. Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Herschberger, Ruth. 1970. Adam’s Rib. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Ruth. 1988a. “Some Thoughts about the Masculinity of the Natural Sciences.” In Feminist Thought and the Structure of Knowledge, ed. Gergen, M., 1–15. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Ruth. 1988b. “Science, Facts, and Feminism.” Hypatia. Special Issue: Feminism and Science 3(1): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, Ruth. 1990. The Politics of Women’s Biology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1983. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1995. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kirksey, Eben, ed. 2014. The Multispecies Salon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Koedt, Anne. 2000 [1970]. “The Myth of the Vaginal Orgasm.” In Radical Feminism: A Documentary Reader, ed. Crow, Barbara A., 371–377. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Lamphere, Louise and Rosaldo, Michelle Z., eds. 1974. Woman, Culture, and Society. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Landecker, Hannah. 2011. “Food As Exposure: Nutritional Epigenetics and the New Metabolism.” BioSocieties 6(2): 167–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, Nadine. 2013. Enacting Molecular Complexity: Data and Health in the Metabonomics Laboratory. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Lock, M. and Nguyen, V. K.. 2010. An Anthropology of Biomedicine. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
MacCormack, Carole P. and Strathern, Marilyn, eds. 1980. Nature, Culture and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Emily. 1987. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Emily. 1991. “The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male–Female Roles.” Signs 16(3): 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M’charek, Amade. 2005. The Human Genome Project: An Ethnography of Scientific Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, Kate. 1970. Sexual Politics. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Morgan, Robin, ed. 1970. Sisterhood Is Powerful: An Anthology of Writings from the Women’s Liberation Movement. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy and Lindee, Susan. 1995. The DNA Mystique: The Gene As Cultural Icon. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry B. 1972. “Is Female to Male As Nature Is to Culture?” Feminist Studies 1(2): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1943. “The Kinship System of the Contemporary United States.” American Anthropologist 45(1): 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Rayna. 1999. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reed, Evelyn. 1970. Problems of Women’s Liberation: A Marxist Approach. New York: Pathfinder Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1976. Of Woman Born: Motherhood As Institution and Experience. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle. 1975. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Toward an Anthropology of Women, ed. Reiter, Rayna, 157–210. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, David Murray. [1968] 1980. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, David Murray. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1980. “No Nature, No Culture: The Hagen Case.” In Nature, Culture and Gender, ed. MacCormack, C. and Strathern, M., 194–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992a Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992b After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. [1974] 2016. Before and After Gender: Sexual Mythologies of Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: Hau Books.Google Scholar
Thompson, Charis. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, Sylvia J. and Collier, Jane F.. 1987. “Toward a Unified Analysis of Gender and Kinship.” In Gender and Kinship: Essays toward a Unified Analysis, ed. Collier, J. F. and Yanagisako, S. J., 14–52. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Michael D. and Willmott, Peter. 1957. Family and Kinship in East London. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×