Aiyyappan, A. 1934. “Cross-Cousin and Uncle–Niece Marriages in South India.” In Congrès International des Sciences Anthropologiques et Ethnosociologiques. Compte-rendu de la Première Session. London: Institut Royal d’Anthropologie.Google Scholar

Annoussamy, David. 2003. “Le mariage entre oncle et nièce dans le sud de l’Inde.” In Etudes en hommage à Eugène Schaeffer, ed. Bourdeaux, Gauthier and Berthier, Susy, 63–75. Paris: Emile Bruylant.Google Scholar

Appadurai, Arjun. 1981. “Gastro-Politics in Hindu South Asia.” American Ethnologist 8(3): 494–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appadurai, Arjun. 1985. “Gratitude As a Social Mode in South India.” Ethos 13(3): 236–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arumugam, Indira. 2011. Kinship as Citizenship: State Formation, Sovereignty and Political Ethics among the Kallars in Central Tamil Nadu. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Anthropology of the London School of Economics.Google Scholar

Beck, E. F. Brenda. 1972. Peasant Society in Koṅku: A Study of Right and Left Subcastes in South India. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Beck, E. F. Brenda. 1974. “The Kin Nucleus in Tamil Folklore.” In Beck, B., Issue 7 of Michigan Papers on South and Southeast Asia, 1–27, Center for South and Southeast Asia Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Caldwell, Robert. 1856. A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South Indian Family of Languages. London: Harrison.Google Scholar

Clark-Decès, . 2014. The Right Spouse: Preferential Marriages in Tamil Nadu. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, Jane F. and Yanagisako, Sylvia J.. 1987. “Toward a Unified Analysis of Gender and Kinship.” In Gender and Kinship: Essays toward a Unified Analysis, ed. Collier, Jane F. and Yanagisako, Sylvia J., 14–50. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

di Leonardo, Micaela. 1979. “Methodology and Misinterpretation of Women’s Status in Kinship Studies: A Case Study of Goodenough and the Definition of Marriage.” American Ethnologist 6(4): 627–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumont, Louis. 1953. “The Dravidian Kinship Terminology As an Expression of Marriage.” Man 53: 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumont, Louis. 1980. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dumont, Louis. 1983. Affinity As a Value: Marriage Alliance in South India, with Comparative Essays on Australia. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dumont, Louis. 1986 [1957]. A South Indian Subcaste: Social Organization and Religion of the Pramalai Kallar. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Emeneau, B. Murray. 1953. Dravidian Kinship Terms. Language 29(3): 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, C. J. 1995. “The ‘Holy Family’ of Shiva in a South Indian Temple.” Social Anthropology 3(3): 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Good, Anthony. 1980. “Elder Sister’s Daughter Marriage in South Asia.” Journal of Anthropological Research 36(4): 474–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Good, Anthony. 1981. “Prescription, Preference and Practice: Marriage Patterns among the Kondaiyankottai Maravar of South India.” Man (n.s.) 16: 108–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Good, Anthony. 1996. “On the Non-existence of ‘Dravidian Kinship.’” Edinburgh Papers in South Asian Studies 6: 1–12.Google Scholar

Good, Anthony. 2000. “Power and Fertility: Divine Kinship in South India.” In Culture, Creation and Procreation, ed. Bock, Monika and Rao, Aparna, 323–356. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar

Hann, Katherine. 1985. “The Incidence of Relation Marriage in Karnataka, South India.” South Asia Research 5(1): 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harman, William P. 1989. The Sacred Marriage of a Hindu Goddess. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Hudson, Dennis. 1977. “Siva, Minaksi, Visnu: Reflections on a Popular Myth in Madurai.” The Indian Economic and Social History Review 14(1): 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kapadia, Karin. 1995. Siva and Her Sisters: Gender, Caste, and Class in Rural South India. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Translated from the French by James Harle Bell, John Richard von Sturmer and Rodney Needham. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1983. “Reflections on the Atom of Kinship.” In Structural Anthropology 2: 82–112. Translated by Monique Layton. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McCormack, William. 1958. “Sister’s Daughter Marriage in a Mysore Village.” Man in India 38(1): 34–48.Google Scholar

Mauss, Marcel. 1990. The Gift (The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies). Translated by W. D. Halls. Foreword by Mary Douglas. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Morgan, Henry Lewis. 1871. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 17. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar

Parkin, J. Robert. 1996a. “On Dumont’s ‘Affinal Terms’: Comment on Rudner.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 30: 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parkin, J. Robert. 1996b. “Genealogy and Category: An Operational View.” L’Homme 139: 87–108.Google Scholar

Rao, Kodanda M. 1973. “Rank Difference and Marriage Reciprocity in South India. An Aspect of the Implications of Elder Sister’s Daughter Marriage in a Fishing Village in Andhra.” In Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s) 7: 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reddy, Govinda. P. 1993. Marriage Practices in South India: Social and Biological Aspects of Consanguineous Unions. Madras: Department of Anthropology, University of Madras.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1907. “The Marriage of Cousins in India.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, July, 611–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rivers, W. H. R. 1968 [1914]. Kinship and Organization. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Rubin, Gayle. 1975. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Toward an Anthropology of Women, ed. Reiter, Rayna R., 157–210. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Rudner, David West. 1990. “Inquest on Dravidian Kinship: Louis Dumont and the Essence of Marriage Alliance.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 24(2): 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheffler, Harold. 1977. “Kinship and Alliance in South India and Australia.” American Anthropologist 79: 869–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheffler, Harold. 1984. “Markedness and Extensions: The Tamil Case.” Man (n.s.) 19: 557–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, David M. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shulman, David Dean. 1980. Tamil Temple Myths: Sacrifice and Divine Marriage in the South Indian Saiva Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tamil Lexicon. 2007. Tamil Lexicon. University of Madras, 1924–1936. At http://dsal.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/tamil-lex/.Google Scholar

Trautmann, Thomas R. 1981. Dravidian Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Trawick, Margaret. 1990. Notes on Love in a Tamil Family. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tylor, Edward B. 1889. “On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions: Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent.” The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 18: 245–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uberoi, Patricia. 2006. “Hierarchy and Marriage: Alliance in Indian Kinship.” In Caste, Hierarchy and Individualism: Indian Critiques of Louis Dumont’s Contributions, ed. Khare, R. S., 159–163. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yalman, Nur. 1962. “The Structure of the Sinhalese Kindred: A Re-Examination of the Dravidian Terminology.” American Anthropologist (n.s.) 64(3): 548–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar