Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T19:16:00.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Irony in Linguistic Communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2023

Edited by
Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr  and
Herbert L. Colston
Herbert L. Colston
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought , pp. 129 - 234
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Athanasiadou, A. (1991). The discourse function of questions. Pragmatics, 1(1), 107–122.Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, A. (2020). Irony in constructions. In Athanasiadou, A. & Colston, H. L. (Eds.), The diversity of irony (pp. 78–90). De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanasiadou, A. (forthcoming). Verbal irony: Duality subjected to evaluation. In Colston, H. L. (Ed.), What makes a figure? Re-thinking figuration. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Camp, E., & Hawthorne, J. (2008). Sarcastic ‘like’: A case study in the interface of syntax and semantics. Philosophical Perspectives, 22, 1–21.Google Scholar
Colston, L. H. (2018). Irony as indirectness cross-linguistically: On the scope of generic mechanisms. In Capone, A. (Ed.), Indirect reports and pragmatics in the world languages: Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology (Vol. 19; pp. 109–131). Springer.Google Scholar
Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, J. Ch. (1982). Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Hanshin Publishing.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, T., & Schul, Y. (2008). The meaning of negated adjectives. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5(4), 517–540.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1&2), 5–27.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2012). Are ironic acts deliberate? Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 104–115.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giora, R., Givoni, S., & Fein, O. (2015). Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(4), 290–313.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Johnson, A. A. (2020). The production of verbal irony: How to be an ironist. In Barnden, J. & Gargett, A. (Eds.), Producing figurative expression (pp. 263–295). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., Kassler, M. A., Coppenrath, L., & McLain Allen, B. (1999). Tag questions and common ground effects in the perception of verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1685–1700.Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (2007). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. In Gibbs, Raymond W. & Colston, Herbert L. (Eds.), Irony in language and thought (2nd ed.; pp. 57–95). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English grammar. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. (2005). Frame-shifting in Humor and Irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 20(4), 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1990). Collins COBUILD English Grammar. Collins.Google Scholar
Walton, K. (2015). Meiosis, hyperbole, irony. Philos Stud. Springer.Google Scholar
Watzlawick, P. (1983). The situation is hopeless but not serious: The pursuit of unhappiness. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

References

Adler, R. M. (2018) Toward a psycholinguistic model of irony comprehension (unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Maryland).Google Scholar
Adler, R. M., Novick, J. M., & Huang, Y. T. (2016). The time course of verbal irony comprehension and context integration. Pre-proceedings of Trends in Experimental Pragmatics, 1–9.Google Scholar
Aguert, M. (2022). Paraverbal expression of verbal irony: Vocal cues matter and facial cues even more. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 46(1), 45–70.Google Scholar
Alba-Juez, L., & Attardo, S. (2014). The evaluative palette of verbal irony. In Alba-Juez, L., & Thompson, G. (Eds.), Evaluation in Context (pp. 93–115). Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attardo, S. (2013). Intentionality and irony. In Ruiz-Gurillo, L. & Alvarado-Ortega, M. B. (Eds.), Irony and humor: From pragmatics to discourse (pp. 39–57). Benjamins.Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (2020). The linguistics of humor: An introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Attardo, S., Eisterhold, J., Hay, J., & Poggi, I. (2003). Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 16(2), 243–260.Google Scholar
Au-Yeung, S. K., Kaakinen, J. K., Liversedge, S. P., & Benson, V. (2015). Processing of written irony in autism spectrum disorder: An eye-movement study. Autism Research, 8. 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1490CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach, K. (2006). The top 10 misconceptions about implicature. In Birner, B. J. & Ward, G. (Eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn (pp. 21–30). Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baptista, N. I., Macedo, E. C., & Boggio, P. S. (2015). Looking more and at different things: Differential gender eye-tracking patterns on an irony comprehension task. Psychology & Neuroscience, 8(2), 157–167.Google Scholar
Barzy, M., Filik, R., Williams, D., & Ferguson, H. J. (2020). Emotional processing of ironic versus literal criticism in autistic and nonautistic adults: Evidence from eye-tracking. Autism Research, 13(4), 563–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bezuidenhout, A., & Cutting, J. C. (2002). Literal meaning, minimal propositions, and pragmatic processing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4), 433–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brône, G. (2021). The multimodal negotiation of irony and humor in interaction. In Soares da Silva, A. (Ed.), Figurative language – Intersubjectivity and usage (pp. 109–135). Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bruntsch, R., & Ruch, W. (2017). Studying irony detection beyond ironic criticism. Let’s include ironic praise. Frontiers in Psychology, 8,75–89.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A. (2010). Prosodic contrasts in ironic speech. Discourse Processes, 47(7), 545–566.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2005). Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language and Speech, 48(3), 257–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, H. C., Chan, Y. C., Dai, R. H., Liao, Y. J., & Tu, C. H. (2017). Neurolinguistics of humor. In Attardo, S. (Ed.). The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 282–294). Routledge.Google Scholar
Climie, E. A., & Pexman, P. M. (2008). Eye gaze provides a window on children’s understanding of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Development, 9(3), 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L. (2002). Contrast and assimilation in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(2), 111–142.Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. (2020). Eye-rolling, irony and embodiment. In Athanasiadou, A. & Colston, H. (Eds.), The Diversity of Irony (pp. 211–235). De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosme, G., Rosa, P. J., Lima, C. F., Tavares, V., Scott, S., Chen, S., Wilcockson, T. D. W., Crawford, T. J., & Prata, D. (2021). Pupil dilation reflects the authenticity of received nonverbal vocalizations. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
De Beugher, S., Brône, G., & Goedemé, T. (2018). A semi-automatic annotation tool for unobtrusive gesture analysis. Language Resources and Evaluation, 52(2), 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, C., Oben, B., & Brône, G. (2021). Exploring the role of the body in communicating ironic stance. Languages and Modalities, 1, 65–80.Google Scholar
Deliens, G., Antoniou, K., Clin, E., Ostashchenko, E., & Kissine, M. (2018). Context, facial expression and prosody in irony processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 99, 35–48.Google Scholar
Demberg, V., & Sayeed, A. (2016). The frequency of rapid pupil dilations as a measure of linguistic processing difficulty. PloS One, 11(1), e0146194.Google Scholar
Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Phelps, F. G. (2005). Gaze aversion: A response to cognitive or social difficulty? Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 727–733.Google Scholar
Dress, M. L., Kreuz, R. J., Link, K. E., & Caucci, G. M. (2008). Regional variation in the use of sarcasm. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabry, R. E. (2019). Getting it: A predictive processing approach to irony comprehension. Synthese, 1–35.Google Scholar
Filik, R., Brightman, E., Gathercole, C., & Leuthold, H. (2017). The emotional impact of verbal irony: Eye-tracking evidence for a two-stage process. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filik, R., Howman, H., Ralph-Nearman, C., & Giora, R. (2018). The role of defaultness and personality factors in sarcasm interpretation: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(3), 148–162.Google Scholar
Filik, R., Leuthold, H., Wallington, K., & Page, J. (2014). Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 811.Google Scholar
Filik, R., & Moxey, L. M. (2010). The on-line processing of written irony. Cognition, 116(3), 421–436.Google Scholar
Forabosco, G. (1992). Cognitive aspects of the humor process: The concept of incongruity. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 5(1–2), 45–68.Google Scholar
Fox Tree, J. E., D’Arcey, J. T., Hammond, A. A., & Larson, A. S. (2020). The sarchasm: Sarcasm production and identification in spontaneous conversation. Discourse Processes, 1–27.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jr., R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting figurative language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19(2), 239–264.Google Scholar
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N., & Zur, A. (2004). Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(2), 115–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Givoni, S., & Fein, O. (2015). Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(4), 290–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Givoni, S., Heruti, V., & Fein, O. (2017a). The role of defaultness in affecting pleasure: The optimal innovation hypothesis revisited. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Giora, R., Meytes, D., Tamir, A., Givoni, S., Heruti, V., & Fein, O. (2017b). Defaultness shines while affirmation pales. In Athanasiadou, A.& Colston, H. (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 219–236). Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gironzetti, E. (2017) Multimodal and eye-tracking evidence in the negotiation of pragmatic intentions in dyadic conversations: The case of humorous discourse (unpublished PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University-Commerce).Google Scholar
Gironzetti, E. (2022) The multimodal performance of conversational humor. Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Howman, H. E., & Filik, R. (2020). The role of emoticons in sarcasm comprehension in younger and older adults: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(11), 1729–1744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820922804Google Scholar
Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2009). Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognitive Psychology, 58(3), 376–415.Google Scholar
Ivanko, S. L., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). Context incongruity and irony processing. Discourse Processes, 35(3), 241–279.Google Scholar
Jacob, H., Kreifelts, B., Nizielski, S., Schütz, A., & Wildgruber, D. (2016). Effects of emotional intelligence on the impression of irony created by the mismatch between verbal and nonverbal cues. PloS One, 11(10), e0163211.Google Scholar
Janisse, M. P. (1977). Pupillometry: The psychology of the pupillary response. Wiley.Google Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354.Google Scholar
Kaakinen, J. K., Olkoniemi, H., Kinnari, T., & Hyönä, J. (2014). Processing of written irony: An eye movement study. Discourse Processes, 51(4), 287–311.Google Scholar
Katz, A. (2017). The standard experimental approach to the study of irony: Let us not be hasty in throwing out the baby with the bath water. In Athanasiadou, A. & Colston, H. (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 237–254). Benjamins.Google Scholar
Katz, A. N., & Ferretti, T. R. (2001). Moment-by-moment reading of proverbs in literal and nonliteral contexts. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3–4), 193–221.Google Scholar
Kennison, S. M. (2020). The cognitive neuroscience of humor. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Kowatch, K., Whalen, J. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2013). Irony comprehension in action: A new test of processing for verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 50, 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. (2020). Irony and sarcasm. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Noveck, I. (2018). Experimental pragmatics: The making of a cognitive science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olkoniemi, H. (2019) Individual differences in processing written irony (PhD dissertation, University of Turku).Google Scholar
Olkoniemi, H., Johander, E., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2019a). The role of look-backs in the processing of written sarcasm. Memory & Cognition, 47(1), 87–105.Google Scholar
Olkoniemi, H., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2021). Processing of irony in text: A systematic review of eye tracking studies. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(2), 99–106.Google Scholar
Olkoniemi, H., Ranta, H., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2016). Individual differences in the processing of written sarcasm and metaphor: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(3), 433.Google Scholar
Olkoniemi, H., Strömberg, V., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2019b). The ability to recognise emotions predicts the time-course of sarcasm processing: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(5), 1212–1223.Google Scholar
Panzeri, F., Giustolisi, B., Mantovan, L., & Calderone, C. (2019). Joker face. Recognizing irony in the visual mode in spoken and signed language. Proceedings of the 22nd Amsterdam Colloquium, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC) (pp. 603–611).Google Scholar
Paterson, K. B., Sanford, A. J., Moxey, L. M., & Dawydiak, E. (1998). Quantifier polarity and referential focus during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(2), 290–306.Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M. (2008). It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 286–290.Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M., Ferretti, T. R., & Katz, A. N. (2000). Discourse factors that influence online reading of metaphor and irony. Discourse Processes, 29(3), 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P. M., Rostad, K. R., McMorris, C. A., Climie, E. A., Stowkowy, J., & Glenwright, M. R. (2011). Processing of ironic language in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(8), 1097–1112.Google Scholar
Pickering, L., Corduas, M., Eisterhold, J., Seifried, B., Eggleston, A., & Attardo, S. (2009). Prosodic markers of saliency in humorous narratives. Discourse Processes, 46(6), 517–540.Google Scholar
Randall, J. G., Oswald, F. L., & Beier, M. E. (2014). Mind-wandering, cognition, and performance: A theory-driven meta-analysis of attention regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1411–1431.Google Scholar
Rockwell, P. (2000). Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(5), 483–495.Google Scholar
Ruytenbeek, N. (2017). The comprehension of indirect requests: Previous work and future directions. In Depraetere, I. & Salkie, R. (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: Drawing a line (pp. 293–322). Springer.Google Scholar
Schwoebel, J., Dews, S., Winner, E., & Srinivas, K. (2000). Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterances: Further evidence. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 47–61.Google Scholar
Serlin, G. (2012). Gaze allocation to the speaker’s face during ironic and sincere statements: Relations to features of the broad autism phenotype in typically developing children and adults (unpublished PhD dissertation, City University of New York).Google Scholar
Simarro Vázquez, M., El Khatib, N., Hamrick, P., & Attardo, S. (2020). On the order of processing of humorous tweets with visual and verbal elements. Internet Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00060.simGoogle Scholar
Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Cole, P. (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 295–318). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tabacaru, S., & Lemmens, M. (2014). Raised eyebrows as gestural triggers in humour: The case of sarcasm and hyper-understanding. The European Journal of Humour Research, 2(2), 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titz, J., Scholz, A., & Sedlmeier, P. (2018). Comparing eye trackers by correlating their eye-metric data. Behavior Research Methods, 50(5), 1853–1863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tromp, J., Hagoort, P., & Meyer, A. S. (2016). Pupillometry reveals increased pupil size during indirect request comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(6), 1093–1108.Google Scholar
Trott, S., Reed, S., Ferreira, V., & Bergen, B. (2019). Prosodic cues signal the intent of potential indirect requests. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1142–1148), Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Turcan, A., & Filik, R. (2016). An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(12), 1867–1893.Google Scholar
Turcan, A., & Filik, R. (2017). Investigating sarcasm comprehension using eye-tracking during reading: What are the roles of literality, familiarity, and echoic mention? In Athanasiadou, A. & Colston, H. L. (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 255–276). Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Țurcan, A., Howman, H., & Filik, R. (2020). Examining the role of context in written sarcasm comprehension: Evidence from EYE-TRACKING DURING READING. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(10), 1966–1976. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000910Google Scholar
Utsumi, A. (2000). Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1777–1806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Wel, P., & van Steenbergen, H. (2018). Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(6), 2005–2015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2020). Unravelling the misconception about deception and nervous behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1377), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vulchanova, M., Chahboun, S., Galindo-Prieto, B., & Vulchanov, V. (2019). Gaze and motor traces of language processing: Evidence from autism spectrum disorders in comparison to typical controls. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 36(7–8), 383–409.Google Scholar
Whalen, J. M., Doyle, A., & Pexman, P. M. (2020). Sarcasm between siblings: Children’s use of relationship information in processing ironic remarks. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. A., Burns, E. L., & Harmon, E. A. (2009). Insincere utterances and gaze: Eye contact during sarcastic statements. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108(2), 565–572.Google Scholar
Wrench, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). A temperamental understanding of humor communication and exhilaratability. Communication Quarterly, 49(2), 142–159.Google Scholar
Younis, M. H., Salik, M., Gul, S. T., & Aleem, A. (2021, July). Automatic human facial affect classification using computational intelligence techniques. In 2021 Mohammad Ali Jinnah University International Conference on Computing (MAJICC) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.Google Scholar

References

Aguert, M., Laval, V., Gauducheau, N., Atifi, H., & Marcoccia, M. (2016). Producing irony in adolescence: A comparison between face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Psychology of Language and Communication, 20(3), 199–218.Google Scholar
Alba-Juez, L., & Attardo, S. (2014). The evaluative palette of verbal irony. In Thompson, G. and Alba-Juez, L. (Eds.), Evaluation in Context (pp. 93–115). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Booth, W. (1974). A rhetoric of irony. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A., & Fox Tree, J. E. 2005. Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language and Speech, 48(3), 257–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chovanec, J. (2018). Irony as counter positioning reader comments on the EU migrant crisis. In Jobert, M. and Sorlin, S. (Eds.), The pragmatics of irony and banter (pp. 165–194). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. (2000). On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition, 8(2), 277–324.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2020). Operationalization challenges in experimental research on irony identification in computer-mediated communication. Paper delivered at the 9th International Symposium on Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics: “Communication in the 21st Century: Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics.” Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain.Google Scholar
Eneroth, F. (2017). “Ooooh, so strong”: Ironic responses to Donald Trump’s presidential tweets. Student’s paper. Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Faina, J. M. (2014). New media is a joke: Tracing irony, satire, and remediation in online discourse (PhD thesis, The University of Texas).Google Scholar
Filik, R., T¸urcan, A., Thompson, D., Harvey, N., Davies, H., & Turner, A. (2016). Sarcasm and emoticons: Comprehension and emotional impact. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(11), 2130–2146.Google Scholar
Gal, N. (2019). Ironic humor on social media as participatory boundary work. New Media & Society, 21(3), 729–749.Google Scholar
Gal, N., Kampf, Z., & Shifman, L. (2020). SRSLY?? A typology of online ironic markers. Information, Communication & Society, 25(3): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1814380Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 5–27.Google Scholar
Hallmann, K., Kunneman, F., Liebrecht, C., van den Bosch, A., & van Mulken, M. (2016). Sarcastic soulmates: Intimacy and irony markers in social media messaging. LiLT, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.33011/lilt.v14i.1405Google Scholar
Hancock, J. T. (2004). Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 447–463.Google Scholar
Kovaz, D., Kreuz, R. J., & Riordan, M. A. (2013). Distinguishing sarcasm from literal language: Evidence from books and blogging. Discourse Processes, 50, 598–615.Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. (2020). Irony and sarcasm. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kunneman, F., Liebrecht, C., van Mulken, M., & van den Bosch, A. (2015). Signaling sarcasm: From hyperbole to hashtag. Information Processing and Management, 51, 500–509.Google Scholar
Marwick, A., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.Google Scholar
McCulloch, G. (2019). Because internet. In Understanding the new rules of language. Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
Pano Alamán, A. (2015). Ironía verbal y actividad de imagen en el discurso de políticos y ciudadanos españoles en Twitter. Sociological Pragmatics, 3(1), 59–89.Google Scholar
Pano Alamán, A., & Mancera Rueda, A. (2014). Identidades falsas en Twitter: La ironía y el humor verbal como mecanismos paródicos. Discurso & Sociedad, 8(3), 507–536.Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M., & Zvaigzne, M. T. (2004). Does irony go better with friends? Metaphor and Symbol, 19(2), 143–163.Google Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, M. (2014). Pretence and echo: Towards an integrated account of verbal irony. International Review of Pragmatics, 6, 127–168.Google Scholar
Romm, C. (2016, May 3). Has social media changed how we use sarcasm? The Cut. www.thecut.com/2016/05/has-social-media-changed-how-we-use-sarcasm.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ruhl, M. (2016). Pragmatics of the keyboard: An analysis of orthographic conventions on Tumblr (MA thesis, San Francisco State University).Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thompson, D., & Filik, R. (2016). Sarcasm in written communication: Emoticons are efficient markers of intention. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21, 105–120.Google Scholar
Vengaliene, D. (2014). On some social functions of irony in politicised internet discourse. Inter-studia humanitatis, 16, 105–119.Google Scholar
Vicary, S., & Murru, M. F. (2020, July–September). One platform, a thousand worlds: On Twitter irony in the early response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Social Media + Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948254Google Scholar
Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90.Google Scholar
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.Google Scholar
Walther, J. B., & D’Addario, K. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 324–347.Google Scholar
Weissman, B., & Tanner, D. (2018). A strong wink between verbal and emoji-based irony: How the brain processes ironic emojis during language comprehension. PLoS ONE, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201727Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2009). Irony and metarepresentation. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 21, 183–226.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2013). Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 59(A), 40–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yus, F. (2004). Pragmatics of humorous strategies in El Club de la Comedia. In Márquez-Reiter, R. and Placencia, M. E. (Eds.), Current trends in the pragmatics of Spanish (pp. 320–344). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2005). Attitudes and emotions through written text: The case of textual deformation in internet chat rooms. Pragmalingüística, 13, 147–174.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2009). Saturación contextual en la comprensión de la ironía. In Ruiz Gurillo, L. and Padilla García, X. (Eds.), Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres: Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía (pp. 309–331). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics. Internet-mediated communication in context. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2014). Not all emoticons are created equal. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 14(3), 511–529.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2016a). Humour and relevance. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2016b). Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition, 23(1), 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yus, F. (2016c). Relevance theory and contextual sources-centred analysis of irony. Current research and compatibility. In Padilla Cruz, M. (Ed.), Relevance theory: Recent developments, current challenges and future Directions (pp. 147–171). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2019). Multimodality in memes. A cyberpragmatic approach. In Bou-Franch, P. and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (Eds.), Analyzing digital discourse: New insights and future directions (pp. 105–131). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2021a). Incongruity-resolution humorous strategies in image macro memes. Internet Pragmatics, 4(1), 131–149.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2021b). Cyberpragmatics in the age of locative media. In Xie, C., Yus, F., & Haberland, H. (Eds.), Internet pragmatics: Theory and practice (pp. 75–105). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2021c). Smartphone communication: Interactions in the app ecosystem. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yus, F. (2023) Pragmatics of internet humour. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Yus, F., & Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2023). Interpreting Covid-related memes: The role of inferential strategies and context accessibility. In Linares Bernabéu, E. (Ed.), The pragmatics of humor in interactive contexts (pp. 6–31). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

References

Angeleri, R., & Airenti, G. (2014). The development of joke and irony understanding: A study with 3- to 6-year-old children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 133–146.Google Scholar
Bosco, F. M., & Gabbatore, I. (2017). Sincere, deceitful, and ironic communicative acts and the role of theory of mind in childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyc.2017.00021Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A. (2012). Is verbal irony special? Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 673–685.Google Scholar
Caffarra, S., Haeri, A. M., Michell, E., & Martin, C. D. (2019). When is irony influenced by communicative constraints? ERP evidence supporting interactive models. European Journal of Neuroscience, 50, 3566–3577.Google Scholar
Caillies, S., Bertot, V., Motte, J., Raynaud, C., & Abely, M. (2014). Social cognition in ADHD: Irony understanding and recursive theory of mind. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 3191–3198.Google Scholar
Capelli, C. A., Nakagawa, N., & Madden, C. M. (1990). How children understand sarcasm: The role of context and intonation. Child Development, 61, 1824–1841.Google Scholar
Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Breton, C. (2002). How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory. Infant and Child Development, 11, 73–92.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181–253.Google Scholar
Climie, E. A., & Pexman, P. M. (2008). Eye gaze provides a window on children’s understanding of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition & Development, 9, 257–285.Google Scholar
Demorest, A., Meyer, C., Phelps, E., Gardner, H., & Winner, E. (1984). Words speak louder than actions: Understanding deliberately false remarks. Child Development, 55, 1527–1534.Google Scholar
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1999). Obligatory processing of literal and nonliteral meanings in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1579–1599.Google Scholar
Dews, S., Winner, E., Kaplan, J., Rosenblatt, E., Hunt, M., Lim, K., McGovern, A., Qualter, A., & Smarsh, B. (1996). Children’s understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development, 67, 3071–3085.Google Scholar
Ebert, S. (2020). Theory of mind, language, and reading: Developmental relations from early childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 191, 104739.Google Scholar
Fabry, R. E. (2019). Getting it: A predictive processing approach to irony comprehension. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02470-9Google Scholar
Filik, R., Howman, H., Ralph-Nearman, C., & Giora, R. (2018). The role of defaultness and personality factors in sarcasm interpretation: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading. Metaphor & Symbol, 33, 148–162.Google Scholar
Filippova, E. (2014). Irony production and comprehension. In Matthews, D. (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 261–277). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Filippova, E., & Astington, J. W. (2008). Further development in social reasoning revealed in discourse irony understanding. Child Development, 79, 126–138.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 3–15.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 457–486.Google Scholar
Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 183–206.Google Scholar
Glenwright, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2010). Development of children’s ability to distinguish sarcasm and verbal irony. Journal of Child Language, 37, 429–451.Google Scholar
Glenwright, M., Tapley, B., Rano, J. K. S., & Pexman, P. M. (2017). Developing appreciation for sarcasm and sarcastic gossip: It depends on perspective. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 3295–3309.Google Scholar
Godbee, K., & Porter, M. (2013). Comprehension of sarcasm, metaphor and simile in Williams syndrome. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48, 651–665.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. T., Dunham, P. J., & Purdy, K. (2000). Children’s comprehension of critical and complimentary forms of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition & Development, 1, 227–248.Google Scholar
Happé, F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101–109.Google Scholar
Harris, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). Children’s perceptions of the social functions of verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 36, 147–165.Google Scholar
Harter, S., & Whitesell, N. R. (1989). Developmental changes in children’s understanding of single, multiple, and blended emotion concepts. In Saarni, C. & Harris, P. L. (Eds.), Children’s understanding of emotion (pp. 81–116). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayashi, H., & Ban, Y. (2020). Children’s understanding of unintended irony and unsuccessful irony. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1783528Google Scholar
Ivanko, S. L., Pexman, P. M., & Olineck, K. M. (2004). How sarcastic are you? Individual differences and verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 244–271.Google Scholar
Kaakinen, J. K., Olkoniemi, H., Kinnari, T., & Hyönä, J. (2014). Processing of written irony: An eye movement study. Discourse Processes, 51, 287–311.Google Scholar
Katz, A. N. (2005). Discourse and sociocultural factors in understanding nonliteral language. In Colston, H. L. & Katz, A. N. (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 183–207). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Keenan, T. R., & Quigley, K. (1999). Do young children use echoic information in their comprehension of sarcastic speech? A test of the echoic mention theory. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 83–96.Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 374–386.Google Scholar
Lee, K., Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2020). Teaching sarcasm: Evaluating metapragmatic training for typically developing children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(2), 139–145.Google Scholar
Malle, B. F. (2002). The relation between language and theory of mind in development and evolution. In Givón, T. & Malle, B. F. (Eds.), The evolution of language out of pre-language (pp. 265–284). Benjamins.Google Scholar
Massaro, D., Valle, A., & Marchetti, A. (2013). Irony and second-order false-belief in children: What changes when mothers rather than siblings speak? European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 301–317.Google Scholar
Massaro, D., Valle, A., & Marchetti, A. (2014). Do social norms, false belief understanding, and metacognitive vocabulary influence irony comprehension? A study of five- and seven-year-old children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 292–304.Google Scholar
Matthews, D., Biney, H., & Abbot-Smith, K. (2018). Individual differences in children’s pragmatic ability: A review of associations with formal language, social cognition, and executive functions. Language Learning and Development, 14, 186–223.Google Scholar
Mazzarella, D., & Pouscoulous, N. (2020). Pragmatics and epistemic vigilance: A developmental perspective. Mind & Language, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12287Google Scholar
Mewhort-Buist, T. A., & Nilsen, E. S. (2013). What are you really saying? Associations between shyness and verbal irony comprehension. Infant and Child Development, 22, 180–197.Google Scholar
Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78, 622–646.Google Scholar
Nicholson, A., Whalen, J. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2013). Children’s processing of emotion in ironic language. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00691.Google Scholar
Nilsen, E. S., Glenwright, M., & Huyder, V. (2011). Children and adults understand that verbal irony interpretation depends on listener knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12, 374–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olkoniemi, H., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2021). Processing of irony in text: A systematic review of eye tracking studies. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(2), 99–106.Google Scholar
Olkoniemi, H., Ranta, H., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2016). Individual differences in the processing of written sarcasm and metaphor: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 42, 433–450.Google Scholar
Olkoniemi, H., Strömberg, V., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2019). The ability to recognize emotions predicts the time-course of sarcasm processing: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 1212–1223.Google Scholar
Pálinkás, I. (2014). Blending and folk theory in an explanation of irony. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 64–98.Google Scholar
Panzeri, F., Giustolisi, B., & Zampini, L. (2020). The comprehension of ironic criticisms and ironic compliments in individuals with Down syndrome: Adding another piece to the puzzle. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 223–234.Google Scholar
Perner, J., & Wimmer, H. (1985). “John thinks that Mary thinks that…”: Attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 437–471.Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M. (2008). It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 286–290.Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M. (2023). Persuasive language development: The case of irony and humour in children’s language. In Fahnestock, J. & Harris, R. A. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Persuasion (pp. 475–487). Routledge.Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M., & Glenwright, M. (2007). How do typically developing children grasp the meaning of verbal irony? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 178–196.Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M., Glenwright, M., Krol, A., & James, T. (2005). An acquired taste: Children’s perceptions of humor and teasing in verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 40, 259–288.Google Scholar
Pons, F., Harris, P. L., & de Rosnay, M. (2004). Emotion comprehension between 3 and 11 years: Developmental periods and hierarchical organization. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 127–152.Google Scholar
Regel, S., Coulson, S., & Gunter, T. C. (2010). The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony. Brain Research, 1311, 121–135.Google Scholar
Rivière, E., & Champagne-Lavau, M. (2020). Which contextual and sociocultural information predict irony perception? Discourse Processes, 57, 259–277.Google Scholar
Rostad, K., & Pexman, P. M. (2014). Developing appreciation for ambivalence: The understanding of concurrent conflicting desires in 4- to 7-year-old children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 122–132.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25, 359–393.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sullivan, K., Winner, E., & Hopfield, N. (1995). How children tell a lie from a joke: The role of second-order mental state attributions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 191–204.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Turcan, A., Howman, H., & Filik, R. (2020). Examining the role of context in written sarcasm comprehension: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 46, 1966–1976.Google Scholar
Utsumi, A. (2000). Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1777–1806.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M. (2014). Making minds: How theory of mind develops. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whalen, J. M., Doyle, A., & Pexman, P. M. (2020). Sarcasm between siblings: Children’s use of relationship information in processing ironic remarks. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 149–159.Google Scholar
Winner, E., & Leekam, S. (1991). Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker’s second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 257–270.Google Scholar
Zajaczkowska, M., & Abbot-Smith, K. (2020). “Sure I’ll help – I’ve just been sitting around doing nothing at school all day”: Cognitive flexibility and child irony comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 199, 104942.Google Scholar

References

Aguert, M. (2022). Paraverbal expression of verbal irony: Vocal cues matter and facial cues even more. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 46(1), 45–70.Google Scholar
Anikin, A., Bååth, R., & Persson, T. (2018). Human nonlinguistic vocal repertoire: Call types and their meaning. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 42(1), 53–80.Google Scholar
Anolli, L., Ciceri, R., & Infantino, M. G. (2002). From “blame by praise” to “praise by blame”: Analysis of vocal patterns in ironic communication. International Journal of Psychology, 37(5), 266–276.Google Scholar
Attardo, S., Eisterhold, J., Hay, J., & Poggi, I. (2003). Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 16, 243–260.Google Scholar
Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A. (2010). Prosodic contrasts in ironic speech. Discourse Processes, 47(7), 545–566.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A. (2011). Verbal irony in the wild. Pragmatics and Cognition, 19(2), 291–309.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A. (2012). Is verbal irony special? Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(11), 673–685.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A. (2013). Animal signals and emotion in music: Coordinating affect across groups. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 990.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A. (2020). Evolution, structure, and functions of human laughter. In Floyd, K. & Weber, R. (Eds.), Handbook of communication science and biology (pp. 63–77). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A. (2021). The evolution of human vocal emotion. Emotion Review, 13(1), 25–33.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A., & Barrett, H. C. (2007). Recognizing intentions in infant-directed speech: Evidence for universals. Psychological Science, 18(8), 746–751.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Recognizing verbal irony in spontaneous speech. Metaphor and Symbol, 17(2), 99–117.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2005). Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language and Speech, 48(3), 257–277.Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A., & Nagy, M. (in preparation). Vocal signals of indirect speech.Google Scholar
Burgers, C., van Mulken, M., and Schellens, P. J. (2011). Finding irony: An introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 186–205.Google Scholar
Burghardt, G. (2005). The genesis of animal play. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cheang, H. S., & Pell, M. D. (2008). The sound of sarcasm. Speech Communication, 50(5), 366–381.Google Scholar
Cheang, H. S., & Pell, M. D. (2009). Acoustic markers of sarcasm in Cantonese and English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3), 1394–1405.Google Scholar
Chen, A., & Boves, L. (2018). What’s in a word: Sounding sarcastic in British English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 48(1), 57–76.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 121–126.Google Scholar
Clift, R. (1999). Irony in conversation. Language in Society, 28(4), 523–553.Google Scholar
Cole, J. (2015). Prosody in context: A review. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(1–2), 1–31.Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. (1997). Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes, 23(1), 25–45.Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. (2000). On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition, 8(2), 277–324.Google Scholar
Cowen, A. S., Laukka, P., Elfenbein, H. A., Liu, R., & Keltner, D. (2019). The primacy of categories in the recognition of 12 emotions in speech prosody across two cultures. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(4), 369–382.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (1974). On saying what you mean without meaning what you say. In Lagaly, M., Fox, R., & Bruck, A. (Eds.), Papers from the tenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (pp. 117–127). Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning: A social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 10(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
Eady, S. J., & Cooper, W. E. (1986). Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80(2), 402–415.Google Scholar
Eisterhold, J., Attardo, S., & Boxer, D. (2006). Reactions to irony in discourse: Evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(8), 1239–1256.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (1992). Human maternal vocalizations to infants as biologically relevant signals. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 391–428). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Féry, C. (2013). Focus as prosodic alignment. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 31(3), 683–734.Google Scholar
Fish, K., Rothermich, K., & Pell, M. D. (2017). The sound of (in)sincerity. Journal of Pragmatics, 121, 147–161.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, H. (1983). Dynamic characteristics of voice fundamental frequency in speech and singing. In MacNeilage, P. (Ed.), The production of speech (pp. 39–55). Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 5–27.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Bryant, G. A., & Colston, H. L. (2014). Where is the humor in verbal irony? Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27(4), 575–595.Google Scholar
González-Fuente, S., Prieto, P., & Noveck, I. (2016). A fine-grained analysis of the acoustic cues involved in verbal irony recognition in French. Speech Prosody, 2016, 902–906.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2016). Pragmatic language interpretation as probabilistic inference. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(11), 818–829.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heintz, C., Blancke, S., & Scott-Phillips, T. (2019). Methods for studying cultural attraction. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 28(1), 18–20.Google Scholar
Jun, S. (2019). (Ed.). Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, H. (2003). Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1387–1411.Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbol, 10(1), 21–31.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lucariello, J. (1994). Situational irony: A concept of events gone awry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 129.Google Scholar
Mazzocconi, C., Tian, Y., & Ginzburg, J. (2020). What’s your laughter doing there? A taxonomy of the pragmatic function of laughter. IEEE Trans. Affective Computing, 1–19.Google Scholar
McRoberts, G. W., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Shankweiler, D. P. (1995). The role of fundamental frequency in signaling linguistic stress and affect: Evidence for a dissociation. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(2), 159–174.Google Scholar
Muecke, D. C. (1978). Irony markers. Poetics, 7(4), 363–375.Google Scholar
Owren, M. J., & Rendall, D. (2001). Sound on the rebound: Bringing form and function back to the forefront in understanding nonhuman primate vocal signaling. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews: Issues, News, and Reviews, 10(2), 58–71.Google Scholar
Pell, M. D. (2001). Influence of emotion and focus location on prosody in matched statements and questions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(4), 1668–1680.Google Scholar
Pell, M. D., Monetta, L., Paulmann, S., & Kotz, S. A. (2009). Recognizing emotions in a foreign language. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33(2), 107–120.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A., & Lee, J. J. (2008). The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(3), 833–838.Google Scholar
Pisanski, K., & Bryant, G. A. (2019). The evolution of voice perception. In Eidsheim, N. S. &Meizel, K. L. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of voice studies (pp. 269–300). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pisanski, K., Bryant, G. A., Cornec, C., Anikin, A., & Reby, D. (2022). Form follows function in human nonverbal vocalisations. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 34(3), 303–321.Google Scholar
Provine, R. R. (2000). Laughter: A scientific investigation. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Rockwell, P. (2000). Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(5), 483–495.Google Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T. (2014). Speaking our minds: Why human communication is different, and how language evolved to make it special. Macmillan International Higher Education.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1984). Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 130–136.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Cole, P. (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 295–318). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (2000). The elements of a scientific theory of self-deception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 907(1), 114–131.Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Wharton, T. (2006). Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1559–1579.Google Scholar
Winkler, S. L., & Bryant, G. A. (2021). Play vocalisations and human laughter: A comparative review. Bioacoustics, 30(5), 499–526.Google Scholar

References

Attardo, S. (2009). Register-based humor. In Raskin, V. (Ed.), The Primer of Humor Research (pp. 230–253). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Attardo, S., Hempelmann, C. F., & Di Maio, S. (2002). Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modeling incongruities and their resolutions. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15(1), 3–46.Google Scholar
Bosselut, A., Rashkin, H., Sap, M., Malaviya, C., Celikyilmaz, A., & Choi, Y. (2019). COMET: Common-sense transformers for automatic knowledge graph construction. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 4762–4779). Florence.Google Scholar
Chandler, D. (2020). Semiotics: The basics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Chen, M. X., Lee, B. N., & Bansal, G. (2019). Gmail smart compose: Real-time assisted writing. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (pp. 2287–2295).Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J., (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 121–126.Google Scholar
Garmendia, J. (2018). Irony as opposition. In Irony (pp. 17–41). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A., Li, G., Veale, T., Rosso, P., Shutova, E., Barnden, J., & Reyes, A., (2015). Semeval-2015 task 11: Sentiment analysis of figurative language in twitter. Proceedings of the 9th international workshop on semantic evaluation (pp. 470–478). Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A., & Veale, T. (2016). Fracking sarcasm with neural networks. In Balahur, A., van der Goot, E., Vossen, P., & Montoyo, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment and social media analysis (pp. 161–168). San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A, & Veale, T. (2017).Magnets for sarcasm: Making sarcasm detection timely, contextual and very personal. In Palmer, M., Hwa, R., & Riedel, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 493–502). Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Giora, R. (2018). Lying, irony, and default interpretation. In Meibauer, J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of lying. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giora, R., Ofer Fein, A. K., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N., & Zur, A. (2004). Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(2), 115–141.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 183–198). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, P. (2013). Lexical analysis: Norms and exploitations. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hao, Y., & Veale, T. (2010). An ironic fist in a velvet glove: Creative mis-representation in the construction of ironic similes. Minds and Machines, 20(4), 483–488.Google Scholar
Hearst, M. A. (1992). Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Boitet, C. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 539–545). Nantes, France,Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(4), 374–386.Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, T. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Naseem, U., Razzak, I., Eklund, P., & Musial, K. (2020). Towards improved deep contextual embedding for the identification of irony and sarcasm. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1–7). Glasgow, UK.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. (1946, April). Politics and the English language. Horizon, 13(76), 252–265.Google Scholar
Potamias, R. A., Siolas, G., & Stafylopatis, A. G. (2020). A transformer-based approach to irony and sarcasm detection. Neural Computing and Applications, 32, 17309–17320.Google Scholar
Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., & Sutskeve, I. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. Open AI Technical Paper.Google Scholar
Raskin, V. (1984). Semantic mechanisms of humor. D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Reyes, A., Rosso, P., & Veale, T. (2013). A multidimensional approach for detecting irony in Twitter. Language Resources & Evaluation, 47, 239–268.Google Scholar
Riloff, E., Qadir, A., Surve, P., De Silva, L., Gilbert, N., & Huang, R. (2013). Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. In Yarowsky, D., Baldwin, T., Korhonen, A, Livescu, K., & Bethard, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 704–714). Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–457.Google Scholar
Shahaf, D., Horvitz, E., & Mankoff, R. (2015). Inside jokes: Identifying humorous cartoon captions. In Joachims, T., Webb, G., Margineantu, D., & Williams, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1065–1074). Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1984). Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 130–136.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Cole, P. (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 295–318). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2009). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54.Google Scholar
Tsur, O., Davidov, D., & Rappoport, A. (2010). ICWSM – A great catchy name: Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in online product reviews. In Cohen, W. & Gosling, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (pp. 161–169). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Valitutti, A., & Veale, T. (2015). Inducing an ironic effect in automated tweets. In Schuller, B. (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII) (pp. 153–159). Xi’an, China.Google Scholar
Veale, T. (2013). Humorous similes. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research, 21(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Veale, T. (2018). The “default” in our stars: Signposting nondefaultness in ironic discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(3), 175–184.Google Scholar
Veale, T., & Valitutti, A. (2017). Sparks will fly: Engineering creative script conflicts. Connection Science, 29(4), 332–349.Google Scholar
Whissell, C. (1989). The dictionary of affect in language. In Plutchik, R. & Kellerman, H. (Ed.), Emotion: Theory and research (pp. 113–131). Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Zhang, S., Zhang, X., Chan, J., & Rosso, P. (2018). Irony detection via sentiment-based transfer learning. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 56(5), 1633–1644.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×