Alqassab, M. (2016). Peer feedback provision and mathematical proofs: Role of domain knowledge, beliefs, perceptions, epistemic emotions, and peer feedback content. Doctoral thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians University.Google Scholar

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 7–73.Google Scholar

Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In McMillan, J. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Chesney, S., & Marcangelo, C. (2010). “There was a lot of learning going on”: Using a digital medium to support learning in a professional course for new HE lecturers. Computers & Education, 54, 701–708.Google Scholar

Cho, K., Cho, M., & Hacker, D. J. (2010). Self-monitoring support for learning to write. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(2), 101–113.Google Scholar

Cho, K., Chung, T. R., King, W. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Peer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement: An empirical investigation. Communications of the ACM, 51(3), 83–88.Google Scholar

Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. A. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20, 328–338.Google Scholar

Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing. Written Communication, 23, 260–294.Google Scholar

Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer- and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331–350.Google Scholar

Falchikov, N. (2007). The place of peers in learning and assessment. In Boud, D. & Falchikov, N. (Eds.), Rethinking assessment for higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 128–143). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 395–430.Google Scholar

Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70, 287–322.Google Scholar

Gan, J. S. M. (2011). The effects of prompts and explicit coaching on peer feedback quality. Doctoral thesis, University of Auckland.Google Scholar

Gan, M. J. S., & Hattie, J. (2014). Prompting secondary students’ use of criteria, feedback specificity and feedback levels during an investigative task. Instructional Science, 42, 861–878.Google Scholar

Gan, M. J. S., & Hill, M. (2014). Using a dialogical approach to examine peer feedback during chemistry investigative task discussion. Research in Science Education, 44, 727–749.Google Scholar

Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51, 21–38.Google Scholar

Gielen, M. (2016). The impact of structuring peer feedback in a wiki-based CSCL environment on performance and feedback content. Dissertation, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University.Google Scholar

Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2012). Peer assessment in a wiki: Product improvement, students’ learning and perception regarding peer feedback. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 585–594.Google Scholar

Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015a). Structuring the peer assessment process: A multilevel approach for the impact on product improvement and peer feedback quality. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 435–449.Google Scholar

Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015b). Structuring peer assessment: Comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 315–325.Google Scholar

Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015c). Scripting the role of assessor and assessee in peer assessment in a wiki environment: Impact on peer feedback quality and product improvement. Computers & Education, 88, 370–386.Google Scholar

Gielen, S. (2007). Peer assessment as a tool for learning. Doctoral thesis, University of Leuven.Google Scholar

Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Dierick, S. (2003). Evaluating the consequential validity of new modes of assessment: The influence of assessment on learning, including pre-, post-, and true assessment effects. In Segers, M., Dochy, F., & Cascallar, E. (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 37–54). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar

Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Onghena, P. (2011). An inventory of peer assessment diversity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 137–155.Google Scholar

Gielen, S., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Janssens, S., Schelfhout, W., & Decuyper, S. (2007). A complementary role for peer feedback and staff feedback in powerful learning environments. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar

Gielen, S., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K., & Smeets, S. (2011). Goals of peer assessment and their associated quality concepts. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 719–735.Google Scholar

Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 304–315.Google Scholar

Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S. (2010). Peer feedback as a substitute for teacher feedback. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar

Gikandi, J. W., & Morrow, D. (2016). Designing and implementing peer formative feedback within online learning environments. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25, 153–170.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In Mayer, R. E. & Alexander, P. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 249–271). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar

Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 525–536.Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, J. K. (2016). Toward a model of student response to feedback. In Brown, G. T. L. & Harris, L. R. (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 169–185). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Student attitudes toward networked peer assessment: Case studies of undergraduate students and senior high school students. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29, 241–254.Google Scholar

Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 279–290.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. M. (2016). Global learning partnerships in the café: Peer feedback as a formative assessment tool for animation students. Interactive Learning Environments, 24, 1298–1318.Google Scholar

Messick, S. (1998). Test validity: A matter of consequence. Social Indicators Research, 45, 35–44.Google Scholar

Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In Niegemann, H. M., Brünken, R., & Leutner, D. (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop of SIG 6 Instructional Design of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) (pp. 181–195). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Panadero, E. (2016). Is it safe? Social, interpersonal, and human effects of peer assessment: A review and future directions. In Brown, G. T. L. & Harris, L. R. (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 247–266). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Panadero, E., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). Teachers’ reasons for using peer assessment: Positive experience predicts use. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32, 133–156.Google Scholar

Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 803–830.Google Scholar

Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98.Google Scholar

Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment: Guidelines for classroom implementation. In Laveault, D. & Allal, L. (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 311–326). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2013). The impact of a rubric and friendship on construct validity of peer assessment, perceived fairness and comfort, and performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 195–203.Google Scholar

Patchan, M. M., Hawk, B., Stevens, C. A., & Schunn, C. D. (2013). The effects of skill diversity on commenting and revisions. Instructional Science, 41, 381–405.Google Scholar

Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: How students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality. Instructional Science, 43, 591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265–289.Google Scholar

Rotsaert, T. (2017). The social nature of peer assessment in secondary and higher education: Examining students’ perceptions on interpersonal processes and peer feedback quality in anonymous face-to-face settings using mobile response technology. Doctoral thesis, Ghent University.Google Scholar

Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Estrada, E., & Schellens, T. (2017). How do students perceive the educational value of peer assessment in relation to its social nature? A survey study in Flanders. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 29–40.Google Scholar

Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Schellens, T., & Raes, A. (2018a). “Now you know what you?re doing right and wrong!” Peer feedback quality in synchronous peer assessment in secondary education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(2), 255–275. doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0329-xGoogle Scholar

Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018b). Peer assessment use, its social nature challenges and perceived educational value: a teachers’ survey study. Accepted for publication in Studies in Educational Evaluation.Google Scholar

Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018c). Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: Its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, 75–99. doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0339-8Google Scholar

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.Google Scholar

Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 443–454.Google Scholar

Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Martens, R. L. (2004). Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: Effects on performance and perceptions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, 59–78.Google Scholar

Strijbos, J. W., & Müller, A. (2014). Personale faktoren im feedbackprozess. In Ditton, H. & Müller, A. (Eds.), Feedback und rückmeldungen: Theoretische grundlagen, empirische befunde, praktische anwendungsfelder [Feedback and evaluation: Theoretical foundations, empirical findings, practical implementation] (pp. 87–134). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20, 291–303.Google Scholar

Strijbos, J. W., Ochoa, T. A., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Segers, M., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Fostering interactivity through formative peer assessment in (web-based) collaborative learning environments. In Mourlas, C., Tsianos, N., & Germanakos, P. (Eds.), Cognitive and emotional processes in web-based education: Integrating human factors and personalization (pp. 375–395). Hersey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar

Strijbos, J. W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 265–269.Google Scholar

Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249–276.Google Scholar

van Gennip, N. (2012). Assessing together: Peer assessment from an interpersonal perspective. Doctoral thesis, Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar

van Gennip, N., Segers, M., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4, 41–54.Google Scholar

van Gennip, N., Segers, M., & Tillema, H. H. (2010). Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 20, 280–290.Google Scholar

van Zundert, M. (2012). Conditions of peer assessment for complex learning. Doctoral thesis, Maastrich University.Google Scholar

van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Könings, K. D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2012). The differential effects of task complexity on domain-specific and peer assessment skills. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 32, 127–145.Google Scholar

van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20, 270–279.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3–14.Google Scholar

Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–16.Google Scholar