Ainsworth, L., & Viegut, D. (2006). Common formative assessments: How to connect standards-based instruction and assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar

Armstrong, T. (2000). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (2nd edn.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–144.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1964). Stability and change in human characteristics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment (UCLA-CSIEP), 1(2), 1–12.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1971a). Individual differences in school achievement: A vanishing point? Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappan International.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1971b). Mastery learning. In Block, J. H. (Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory and practice (pp. 47–63). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1977). Favorable learning conditions for all. Teacher, 95(3), 22–28.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1978). New views of the learner for instruction and curriculum. Educational Leadership, 35, 563–576.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1981). All our children learning: A primer for parents, teachers, and other educators. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook 1: The cognitive domain. New York: McKay.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S., Madaus, G. F., & Hastings, J. T. (1981). Evaluation to improve learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Dollard, J., & Miller, N. E. (1950). Personality and psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Duffy, G. G., & Kear, K. (2007). Compliance or adaptation: What is the real message about research-based practices? Phi Delta Kappan, 88, 579–581.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Given, B. K. (2000). Learning styles (rev. edn.). Oceanside, CA: Learning Forum Publications.Google Scholar

Guskey, T. R. (1997). Implementing mastery learning (2nd edn.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Guskey, T. R. (1998). Making time to train your staff. School Administrator, 55(7), 35–37.Google Scholar

Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar

Guskey, T. R. (2001). Mastery learning. In Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, P. B. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (pp. 9372–9377). Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Guskey, T. R. (2003). How classroom assessments improve learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 6–11.Google Scholar

Guskey, T. R. (2007a). Formative classroom assessment and Benjamin S. Bloom: Theory, research, and practice. In McMillan, J. H. (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice (pp. 63–78). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Guskey, T. R. (2007b). Closing achievement gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom’s “Learning for Mastery.” Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 8–31.Google Scholar

Guskey, T. R. (2008). The rest of the story. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 28–35.Google Scholar

Guskey, T. R. (Ed.) (2012). Benjamin S. Bloom: Portraits of an Educator (2nd edn.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar

Guskey, T. R., & DeWitt, P. (2017, June 1). Why do we recycle and sometimes misuse educational words? Education Week Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/finding_common_ground/2017/06/educational_words_wh_they_are_recycled_and_sometimes_misused.html.Google Scholar

Guskey, T. R., & McTighe, J. (2016). Pre-assessment: Promises and cautions. Educational Leadership, 73(7), 38–43.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar

Hockett, J. A., & Doubet, K. J. (2014). Turning on the lights: What pre-assessments can do. Educational Leadership, 71(4), 50–54.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. K., & Sekayi, D. (2016, Winter). Teacher perceptions of response to intervention implementation in light of IDEA goals. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 66–86.Google Scholar

Kastner, J., & Gottlieb, J. (1991). Classification of children in special education: Importance of pre-assessment information. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 19–27.Google Scholar

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook 2: The affective domain. New York: McKay.Google Scholar

Lawrence, G. D. (1997). Looking at type and learning styles. Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.Google Scholar

Lazarowitz, R., & Lieb, C. (2006). Formative assessment pre-test to identify college students’ prior knowledge, misconceptions and learning difficulties in biology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 741–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Minute-by-minute and day-by-day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 18–24.Google Scholar

Leyton, F. S. (1983). The extent to which group instruction supplemented by mastery of initial cognitive prerequisites approximates the learning effectiveness of one-to-one tutorial methods. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Marzano, R. J. (2017). The new art and science of teaching. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.Google Scholar

Mattern, K., Sanchez, E., & Ndum, E. (2017). Why do achievement measures underpredict female academic performance? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 36, 47–57.Google Scholar

Morrison, H. C. (1926). The practice of teaching in the secondary school. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Myles, B. S., Ormsbee, C. K., & Simpson, R. L. (1997). Reflections on “General and special educators’ perceptions of preassessment-related activities and team members.” Exceptionality, 7, 193–197.Google Scholar

Pendergrass, E. (2013). Differentiation: It starts with pre-assessment. Educational Leadership, 71(4).Google Scholar

Scriven, M. S. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In Tyler, R. W., Gagne, R. M., & Scriven, M. (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39–83). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Silver, H. F., Strong, R. W., & Perini, M. J. (2000). So each may learn: Integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Simpson, E. J. (1966). The classification of educational objectives: Psychomotor domain. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar

Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., & DeLisi, R. (2001). Natural classroom assessment: Designing seamless instruction and assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Allowing for thinking styles. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 36–40.Google Scholar

Stiggins, R. (2008). An introduction to student-involved assessment for learning (5th edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Tomlinson, C. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Wagner, E. P., Sasser, H., & DiBiase, W. J. (2002). Predicting students at risk in general chemistry using pre-semester assessments and demographic information. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 749–755.Google Scholar

Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In Gabel, D. (Ed.), Handbook of research in science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Washburne, C. W. (1922). Educational measurements as a key to individualizing instruction and promotions. Journal of Educational Research, 5, 195–206.Google Scholar

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd edn.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar