Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T18:42:42.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Paradigm lost: employment-based defined benefit plans and the current understanding of fiduciary duty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2014

Larry W. Beeferman
Affiliation:
Harvard Law School
James P. Hawley
Affiliation:
St Mary's College, California
Andreas G. F. Hoepner
Affiliation:
ICMA Centre, Henley Business School, University of Reading
Keith L. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Joakim Sandberg
Affiliation:
University of Gothenburg
Edward J. Waitzer
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This volume is witness to the importance of the meaning and import of “fiduciary duty” for the responsibilities of those who make investment-related decisions on behalf of others – “decision-makers” – especially institutional investors, including pension funds. Focus on the subject is animated by the impact of such decisions on those ostensibly to be benefited by them. However, it has also been spurred by concern about how decision-makers’ choices bear upon the behaviors of the enterprises in which they invest and diverse stakeholders in the enterprise and the larger society. Here we largely attend to beneficiaries although we will in some measure address distinct but related concerns of others.

We consider decision-makers for funded employment-based defined benefit plans (“plans”) in the United States and the interests they might legitimately seek to advance. Plans promise workers – and sometimes their spousal survivors – a lifetime income starting at retirement – a “pension.” We refer to as “members” those who potentially qualify for a pension by virtue of their or their spouse’s employment at the enterprise with which the plan is associated. To assure that the promises are kept, workers’ and/or employers’ contributions to the plan are pooled and invested. Plans, like other retirement schemes, are usually subsidized by tax credits and/or deductions for contributions made and no or lower taxation of investment returns and/or plan payouts after retirement.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benefit Corp Information Center. 2012. “Quick FAQs.” .
Ellerman, D. 2006. “Three Themes about Democratic Enterprises: Capital Structure, Education, and Spin-offs,” IAFEP Conference, Mondragon. .
Fischel, D. and Langbein, D.. 1988. “ERISA’S Fundamental Contradiction: The Exclusive Benefit Rule,” University of Chicago Law Review 55: 1105–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keay, A. R. 2010. Moving Towards Stakeholderism? Constituency Statutes, Enlightened Shareholder Value and All That: Much Ado About Little? University of Leeds, School of Law. .Google Scholar
Mercer Investment Consulting and Social Investment Forum. 2007. “Defined Contribution Plans and Socially Responsible Investing in the United States.” .
Merton, R. C. 2006. “Allocating Shareholder Capital to Pension Plans,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 18 (1): 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. 1991. “Opinion Letter 91–4,” May 3. .
US Department of Labor. 1978. “Proposed Regulation Relating to the Investment of Plan Assets Under the ‘Prudence’ Rule,” Federal Register 43 (80): 17480–2.Google Scholar
US Department of Labor 1979. “Rules and Regulations for Fiduciary Responsibility; Investment of Plan Assets Under the ‘Prudence’ Rule,” Federal Register 44 (124): 37221–5.Google Scholar
US Department of Labor 1988. “Letter to Helmut Fandl, Chairman of the Retirement Board of Avon Products, Inc.,” February 23. .
US Department of Labor 1994. “Interpretive Bulletin Relating to Written Statements of Investment Policy, Including Proxy Voting Policy or Guidelines,” Code of Federal Regulations, Title 29. § 2509.94–1. .Google Scholar
US Department of Labor 1995. “General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees’ Pension Plan, Prohibited Transaction Exemption 95–25,” Federal Register 60 (50): 140006–12.Google Scholar
US Department of Labor 1996. “Interpretive Bulletin 96–1, Participant Investment Education; Final Rule,” Federal Register, 61 (113): 29586–90. .Google Scholar
US Internal Revenue Service. 2012. “Retirement Plans FAQs Regarding IRAs.” .
US Senate Committee on Labor Welfare, Subcommittee on Labor. 2000. Legislative History of the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974, Public Law 93–406.
Wooten, J. 2009. “A Legislative and Political History of ERISA Preemption, Part 3,” Journal of Pension Benefits 15 (3): 15–21.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×