Ackerman, B. and Fishkin, J. 2004. Deliberation Day. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Adam, A. 1998. Artificial Knowing: Gender and the Thinking Machine. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Adam, A. 2002. ‘Cyberstalking and Internet Pornography’, Ethics and Information Technology 4, 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adam, A. 2005. Gender, Ethics and Information Technology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adam, A., Griffiths, M., Keogh, C., Moore, K., Richardson, H. and Tattersall, A. 2006. ‘Being an it in IT – Gendered Identities in the IT Workplace’, European Journal of Information Systems 15(4), 368–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adam, A. and Kreps, D. 2006. ‘Enabling or Disabling Technologies? A Critical Approach to Web Accessibility’, Information Technology and People 19(3), 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. 1998. The Next World War: Computers Are the Weapons and the Front Line is Everywhere. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Adler, M. and Posner, E. A. (eds.) 2001. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Economic, Philosophical and Legal Perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Agre, P. and Mailloux, C. 1997. ‘Social Choice about Privacy: Intelligent Vehicle-Highway Systems in the United States’, in Friedman, B. (ed.), Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Akrich, M. 1992. ‘The Description of Technical Objects’, in Bijker, W. and Law, J. E., (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Albrecht, K. and Macintyre, L. 2006. The Spychips Threat: Why Christians Should Resist RFID and Electronic Surveillance. Nashville: Nelson Current.Google Scholar

Albrechtslund, A. 2008. ‘Online Social Networking as Participatory Surveillance’, First Monday 13(3), 3 March. www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2142/1949

Alexander, J. 1999. Future War. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Alterman, A., 2003. ‘“A Piece of Yourself”: Ethical Issues in Biometric Identification’, Ethics and Information Technology 5(3),139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, M. and Anderson, S. L. 2006. ‘Computing an Ethical Theory with Multiple Prima Facie Duties’, in Proceeding EthicALife/ALifeX.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. and Anderson, S. L. 2007. ‘Machine Ethics: Creating an Ethical Intelligent Agent’, Artificial Intelligence Magazine 28(4), Winter, 15.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. and Anderson, S. L. 2008. ‘Ethical Healthcare Agents. Advanced Computational Intelligence Paradigms’, in Jain, L. C. (ed.), Healthcare-3 pp. 233–257. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Anderson, N. 2007. ‘California Outlaws the Forced Subdermal RFID Tagging of Humans’, http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070904-california-outlaws-forced-rfid-tagging-of-humans.html

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, Philosophy33.CrossRef

Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition (2nd edn). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 1968. ‘Crisis in Culture’, in Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought, pp. 197–227. New York: Meridian.Google Scholar

Aristotle, , On the Motion of Animals, On the Soul, Nicomachean Ethics.

Arkin, R. 2004. ‘Bombs, Bonding, and Bondage: Human-Robot Interaction and Related Ethical Issues’. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Roboethics, San Remo, Italy, January 2004.Google Scholar

Arkin, R. 2007. Governing Lethal Behavior: Embedding Ethics in a Hybrid Deliberative/Reactive Robot Architecture. Technical Report GIT-GVU-07–11, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology.

Arquilla, J. and Ronfeldt, D. 1997. In Athena's Camp: Preparing for Conflict in the Information Age. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar

Audi, R. 2007. Moral Value and Human Diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avgerou, C. 2003. ‘The Link Between ICT and Economic Growth in the Discourse of Development’, in Korpeal, M., Montealegre, R. and Poulymenakou, A. 2003, Organizational Information Systems in the Context of Globalization, pp. 373–386. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J. and Guadagno, R. E. 2008. ‘Transformed Social Interaction in Mediated Interpersonal Communication’, in Konijn, E., Tanis, M., Utz, S. and Linden, A. (eds.), Mediated Interpersonal Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Bainbridge, W. S. and Roco, M. C. (eds.) 2006. Managing Nano-bio-info-cogno Innovations: Converging Technologies in Society. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef

Barab, S., Dodge, T., Thomas, M. K., Jackson, C. and Tuzun, H. 2007. ‘Our Designs and the Social Agendas They Carry’, Journal of the Learning Sciences 16, 263–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbaro, M. and Zeller Jr., T. 2006. ‘A Face is Exposed for AOL Searcher No. 4417749’, The New York Times, 9 August.

Barcan Marcus, R. 1987. ‘Moral Dilemmas and Consistency’, in Gowans (1987), pp. 188–204.

Barger, R. N. 2008. Computer Ethics: A Case-Based Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barlow, J. 1995. ‘Coming into the Country’, in Johnson, D. G. and Nissenbaum, H. (eds.), Computers, Ethics and Social Value, pp. 15–18. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Barnaby, F. 1986. The Automated Battlefield. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, S. B. 2006. ‘A Privacy Paradox: Social Networking in the United States’, First Monday 11(9). www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_9/barnes/index.html#authorCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Beckenstein, J. D. 2003. ‘Information in the Holographic Universe’, Scientific American, August, 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beitz, C. 2001. ‘Does Global Inequality Matter?’, in Pogge, T. W., Global Justice, pp. 106–122. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bell, T. W. 1995. ‘Anonymous Speech,’ Wired, October, http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.10/cyber.rights.html.

Bellin, D. and Chapman, G. 1987. Computers in Battle: Will They Work? New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. 1992. Situating the Self. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Benkler, Y. 2001. ‘The Battle over the Institutional Ecosystem in the Digital Environment’, Communications of the ACM 44(2), 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, I. 1957. The Hedgehog and the Fox: An Essay on Tolstoy's View of History. New York: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Berlin, I. 1958. Two Concepts of Liberty: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered before the University of Oxford on 31 October 1958. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Berlin, I. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bijker, W. and Law, J. (eds.) 1992. Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Black, H. C. 1990. Black's Law Dictionary: Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern (6th edn). St Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar

Blackwell, A. H. 2003. ‘Don't Expect Any Privacy in the Workplace’, WWWiz.Com. wwwiz.com/issue45/

Bloor, D. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Boella, G. and Torre, L. 2004. ‘Fulfilling or Violating Obligations in Normative Multiagent Systems’, IAT 2004, 483–486.

Bohman, J. 1996. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Boltuc, P. (ed.) 2008. APA Newsletter on Computers and Philosophy, Spring 7(2) and Fall 8(1).

Boran, M. 2007. ‘Data Centres Make Big Carbon Footprint’, Siliconrepublic.com, 10 October. www.siliconrepublic.com/news/news.nv?storyid=single9387

Boscarol, M. 2006. ‘Working with Others: Accessibility and User Research’, Accessibility 225, 9 October 09. http://alistapart.com/articles/workingwithothersGoogle Scholar

Bostrom, N. 2002. ‘Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards’, Journal of Evolution and Technology 9, 1–30.Google Scholar

Bostrom, N. 2003. ‘The Transhumanist FAQ, Version 2.1’, www.transhumanism.org/resources/faq.html

Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Nice, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Boyle, James. 2001. ‘A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism for the Net?’, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), Readings in Cyberethics, pp. 231–251. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar

Brandt, D. and Henning, K. 2002. ‘Information and Communication Technologies: Perspectives and Their Impact on Society’, AI and Society 16(3), 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bratman, M. E. 1987. Intention, Plans and Practical Reasoning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Breazeal, C. 2002. Designing Sociable Robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brey, P. 1998. ‘The Politics of Computer Systems and the Ethics of Design’, in Hoven, J. (ed.), Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Brey, P. 1999a. ‘Method in Computer Ethics: Towards a Multi-Level Interdisciplinary Approach’, Ethics and Information Technology 2(3), 1–5.Google Scholar

Brey, P. 1999b. ‘The Ethics of Representation and Action in Virtual Reality’, Ethics and Information Technology 1(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brey, P. 1999c. ‘Worker Autonomy and the Drama of Digital Networks in Organizations’, Journal of Business Ethics 22(1), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brey, P. 2000. ‘Disclosive Computer Ethics’, Computers and Society 30(4), 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brey, P. 2008. ‘Virtual Reality and Computer Simulation’, in Himma, K. E. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Briggle, A., Mitcham, C. and Ryder, M. 2005. ‘Technology: Overview’, in Mitcham, C. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Science, Technology and Ethics, pp. 908–1912. Detroit: Thomson, Gale.Google Scholar

Brin, D. 1999. The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose between Privacy and Freedom? New York: Perseus Books.Google Scholar

Bringsjord, S. 2007. ‘Ethical Robots: The Future Can Heed Us’, AI and Society (online).

Britz, J. 2007. ‘The Internet: The Missing Link Between the Information Rich and the Information Poor?’, in Capurro, R., Frühbauer, J. and Hausmaningers, T. (eds.), Localizing the Internet: Ethical aspects in intercultural perspective, pp. 265–277. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar

Brooks, R. A. 2002. Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Brooks, R. 2007. ‘Robotkind: On the Battlefield and in the Home’, Lecture to the British Computer Society, June 2007. Video online at http://74.125.95.132/server.php?show=ConWebDoc.10440

Brown, C. 2003. Lost Liberties: Ashcroft and the Assault on Personal Freedom. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar

Buchanan, E. A. 2004. ‘Ethical Considerations for the Information Professions’, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T., (eds.), Readings in Cyberethics (2nd edn), pp. 613–624. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar

Buchanan, E. and Campbell, J. 2005. ‘New Threats to Intellectual Freedom: The Loss of the Information Commons through Law and Technology in the US’, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights in a Networked World: Theory and Practice, pp. 205–242. Hershey, PA: INFOSCI.Google Scholar

Budinger, T. F. and Budinger, M. D. 2006. Ethics of Emerging Technologies: Scientific Facts and Moral Challenges. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Burk, D. 2001. ‘Copyrightable Functions and Patentable Speech’, Communications of the ACM 44(2), 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burk, D. 2007. ‘Privacy and Property in the Global Datasphere’, in Hongladarom, S. and Ess, C. (eds.), Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives, pp. 94–107. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Business Services Industry, 2007. ‘TopTenREVIEWS Reports Worldwide Pornography Market at Least $97 Billion; Every Second 28,258 Internet Users View Pornography’, bNet Business Network (12 March). http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_/ai_n27186769

Butler, S, 1985 (1872), Erewhon. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Bynum, T. W. 1985. Editor's Introduction to James Moor, ‘What is Computer Ethics?’, Metaphilosophy 16(4), 263–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bynum, T. W. 1986. ‘Aristotle's Theory of Human Action’, a doctoral dissertation at the Graduate School of the City University of New York. www.southernct.edu/organizations/rccs/

Bynum, T. W. 2000a. ‘The Foundation of Computer Ethics’, Computers and Society 30(2), 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bynum, T. W. 2000b. ‘A Very Short History of Computer Ethics’, Newsletter of the American Philosophical Association on Philosophy and Computing. www.southernct.edu/organizations/rccs/resources/research/introduction/bynum_shrt_hist.html

Bynum, T. W. 2001. ‘Computer Ethics: Basic Concepts and Historical Overview’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-computer/

Bynum, T. W. 2004. ‘Ethical Challenges to Citizens of the “Automatic Age”: Norbert Wiener on the Information Society’, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 2(2), 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bynum, T. W. 2005. ‘Norbert Wiener's Vision: The Impact of the “Automatic Age” on Our Moral Lives’, in Cavalier, R. (ed.), The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives, pp. 11–25. Albany, NY: State University of New YorkPress.Google Scholar

Bynum, T. W. 2006a. ‘Flourishing Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(4), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bynum, T. W. 2006b. ‘A Copernican Revolution in Ethics?’, in Dodig-Crnkovi, G. and Stuart, S. (eds.), Computing, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar

Bynum, T. W. and Rogerson, S. 1996, ‘Global Information Ethics: Introduction and Overview’, Science and Engineering Ethics 2(2), 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camp, J. 1999. ‘Democratic Implications of Internet Protocols,’ The Information Society 15, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camp, L. J. 2003. ‘First Principles of Copyright for DRM Design’, IEEE Internet Computing 7(3), 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canellopoulou-Bottis, M. and Himma, K. E. 2008. ‘The Digital Divide: A Perspective for the Future’, in Himma, K. E. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, pp. 621–637. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castells, M. 2000. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Volume I: The Rise of the Network Society (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chakraborty, R., Stivers, D. N., Su, B., Zhong, Y. and Budowle, B. 1999. ‘The Utility of Short Tandem Repeat Loci Beyond Human Identification: Implications for Development of New DNA Typing’, Electrophoresis 20(8), 1682–1696.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chan, J. 2003. ‘Confucian Attitudes towards Ethical Pluralism’, in Madsen, R. and Strong, T. B. (eds.), The Many and the One: Religions and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World, pp. 129–153. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ciro, T. 2005. ‘The Scarcity of Intellectual Property’, Journal of Information, Law and Technology, www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/Google Scholar

Clark, J. 2006. ‘To Hell with WCAG2’, Accessibility 217, 23 May 2006. http://alistapart.com/articles/tohellwithwcag2Google Scholar

Clarke, S. 2001. ‘Informed Consent in Medicine in Comparison with Consent in Other Areas of Human Activity’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 39, 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, S. 2005. ‘Future Technologies, Dystopic Futures and the Precautionary Principle”, Ethics and Information Technology 7, 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, S. 2009. ‘New Technologies, Common Sense and the Paradoxical Precautionary Principle’, in Duwell, M. and Sollie, P. (eds.), Evaluating New Technologies: Methodological Problems for the Assessment of Technological Developments, pp. 159–173. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, S. G. and Simpson, E. 1989. Anti-Theory in Ethics and Moral Conservatism. Albany, NY: State University of NewYork Press.Google Scholar

Clouser, K. D. 1980. Teaching Bioethics: Strategies, Problems, and Resources. Hastings Center, Institute for Society, Ethics, and the Life Sciences.Google Scholar

Cockburn, C. and Ormrod, S. 1993. Gender and Technology in the Making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Coeckelbergh, M. 2007. ‘Violent Computer Games, Empathy, and Cosmopolitanism’, Ethics and Information Technology 9(3), 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, S. and Gøtze, J. 2001/2004. ‘Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation, Hansard Society’. Online at bowlingtogether.net

Collins, H. M. 1990. Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Collste, G. 2002. ‘The Internet Doctor and Medical Ethics’, Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 5(2), 121–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Combes, R. 2005. ‘A Taxonomy of Technics’, International Philosophical Quarterly 46, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couldry, N. 2003. ‘Digital Divide or Discursive Design? On the Emerging Ethics of Information Space’, Ethics and Information Technology 5(2), 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowan, R. S. 1989. More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar

Critcher, C. 2006. Critical Readings: Moral Panics and the Media. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Cushman, M. and Klecun, E. 2006. ‘How (Can) Nonusers Engage with Technology: Bringing in the Digitally Excluded’, in Trauth, E. M., Howcroft, D., Butler, T., Fitzgerald, B. and DeGross, J. I., Social Inclusion: Societal and Organizational Implications for Information Systems (IFIP Volume 208), pp. 347–364. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dastani, M., Boer, F., Dignum, F., Hoek, W., Kroese, M. and Meyer, J. J., ‘Implementing Cognitive Agents in 3APL’, www.cs.uu.nl/3apl/

Davies, S. 2003. ‘New Techniques and Technologies of Surveillance in the Workplace’, www.amicus-itpa.org//juneconf3.shtml

Davis, R. 2001. ‘The Digital Dilemma’, Communications of the ACM 44(2), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, R. T. 1998. ‘Computers, Ethics, and Business’, Philosophic Exchange 1997–1998, 45–55.

Landa, M. 1991. War in the Age of Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. 1996. ‘When Hal Kills, Who's to Blame?’, in Stork, D. (ed.), Hal's Legacy, pp. 351–365. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennis, L. 1997. ‘Kant's Ethics and Duties to Oneself’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78(4), 321–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devon, R. 2004. ‘Towards a Social Ethics of Technology: A Research Prospect’, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 8(1), 99–115.Google Scholar

Dewan, S. and Riggins, F. J. 2005. ‘The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions’, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 6(12), 298–337.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. 1927. The Public and its Problems. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar

Dobransky, K. and Hargittai, E. 2006. ‘The Disability Divide in Internet Access and Use’, Information, Communication and Society 9(3), 313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. W. 1999. Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Drexler, E. K. 1986. Engines of Creation. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. 2001. On the Internet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. 2001. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dunnigan, J. 1996. Digital Soldiers. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Dusek, V. 2006. Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dyson, L., Hendriks, M. and Grant, S. (eds.). 2007. Information Technology and Indigenous People. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.CrossRef

Eickelman, D. F. 2003. ‘Islam and Ethical Pluralism’, in Madsen, R. and Strong, T. B. (eds.), The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World, pp. 161–180. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. 1954. Ideas and Opinions. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar

Elberfeld, R. 2002. ‘Resonanz als Grundmotiv ostasiatischer Ethik’ [Resonance as a Fundamental Motif of East Asian Ethics], in Elberfeld, R. and Wohlfart, G. (eds.), Kamparative Ethik: Das gute Leben Zwischen den Kulturen [Comparative Ethics: The Good Life between Cultures], pp. 131–141. Cologne: Edition Chora.Google Scholar

,Electronic Frontier Foundation. www.EFF.org

Elgesem, D. 2005. ‘Deliberative Technology?’ in Thorseth, M. and Ess, C. (eds.), Technology in a Multicultural and Global Society, pp. 61–77. Trondheim: NTNU, Programme for Applied Ethics, publ. series no. 6.Google Scholar

Ellul, J. 1964. The Technological Society (trans. Wilkinson, John). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Ess, C. 1996. ‘The Political Computer: Democracy, CMC, and Habermas’ in , Ess, C. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication, pp. 197–230. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Ess, C. 2002. ‘Computer-Mediated Colonization, the Renaissance, and Educational Imperatives for an Intercultural Global Village’, Ethics and Information Technology 4(1), 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ess, C. 2006a. ‘Ethical Pluralism and Global Information Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(4), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ess, C. 2006b. ‘From Computer-Mediated Colonization to Culturally-Aware ICT Usage and Design’, in Zaphiris, P. and Kurniawan, S. (eds.), Advances in Universal Web Design and Evaluation: Research, Trends and Opportunities, pp. 178–197. Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing.Google Scholar

Ess, C. 2007. ‘Cybernetic Pluralism in an Emerging Global Information and Computing Ethics’, International Review of Information Ethics 7 www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/007/11-ess.pdf

Ess, C. 2009. Digital Media Ethics. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Ess, C. and Thorseth, M. 2006. ‘Neither Relativism nor Imperialism: Theories and Practices for a Global Information Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(3), 91–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,ETC Group. 2005. ‘A Tiny Primer on Nano-Scale Technologies and “the Little Bang Theory”’, www.etcgroup.org/documents/TinyPrimer_English.pdf

,European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. 2006. ‘The Appropriateness of Existing Methodologies to Assess the Potential Risks Associated with Engineered and Adventitious Products of Nanotechnologies’, http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_003b.pdf

,European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies. 2005. ‘Ethical Aspects of ICT Implants in the Human Body’, http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/docs/avis20_en.pdf

Fairweather, N. B. and Rogerson, S. 2001. ‘A Moral Approach to Electronic Patient Records’, Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 26(3), 219–234.Google ScholarPubMed

Fallows, J. 2008. ‘The Connection Has Been Reset,’ The Atlantic, www.theatlantic.com/doc/200803/chinese-firewall

Farmer, J. D. and Belin, A. d'A. 1992. ‘Artificial Life: The Coming Evolution”, in Langton, C. G., Taylor, C. E, Farmer, J. D. and Rasmussen, S. (eds.) Artificial Life II: Proceedings of the Workshop on Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, Santa Fe, 1990. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar

Farrell, G., Isaacs, S. and Trucano, M. 2007. ‘The NEPAD e-Schools Demonstration Project: A Work in Progress. Washington, DC: infoDTheWorld Bank’, www.infodev.org/en/Publication.355.html

Ferré, Frederick. 1995. Philosophy of Technology. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar

,Final Declaration of the First European ‘Seas at Risk’ Conference. 1994. www.seas-at-risk.org/n2_archive.php?page=9

Fish, S. 1994. There's No Such Thing as Free Speech…and it's a Good Thing too. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, E., Jones, J. S. and Schomberg, R. 2006. Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and Prospects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fishkin, J. 1997. Voice of the People. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Flanagan, M., Howe, D. and Nissenbaum, H. 2005. ‘Values at Play: Design Tradeoffs in Socially-Oriented Game Design’, in Proceedings of the CHI 2005 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI 2005, 2–7 April, Portland, Oregon. New York: ACM Press.

Flanagan, M., Howe, D. and Nissenbaum, H. 2008. ‘Embodying Values in Technology: Theory and Practice’, in Hoven, J. and Weckert, J. (eds.), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fleischmann, K. R. 2007. ‘Digital Libraries with Embedded Values: Combining Insights from LIS and Science and Technology Studies’, Library Quarterly 77(4), 409–427.

Floridi, L. 1995. ‘Internet: Which Future for Organized Knowledge, Frankenstein or Pygmalion?’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43, 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. 1999a. Philosophy and Computing: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Floridi, L. 1999b. ‘Information Ethics: On the Philosophical Foundations of Computer Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 1(1), 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. 2002a. ‘Information Ethics: An Environmental Approach to the Digital Divide’, Philosophy in the Contemporary World 9(1), 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. 2002b. ‘What Is the Philosophy of Information?’, in Moor, J. H. and Bynum, T. W. (eds.), Cyberphilosophy: The Intersection of Computing and Philosophy, pp. 117–138. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Floridi, L. 2003. ‘On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere’, Ethics and Information Technology 4(4), 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. 2004. ‘Open Problems in the Philosophy of Information’, Metaphilosophy 35(4), 554–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. 2005a. ‘An Interpretation of Informational Privacy and of Its Moral Value’, Proceedings of CEPE 2005 – 6th Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiries Conference, Ethics of New Information Technologies, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.Google Scholar

Floridi, L. 2005b. ‘Information Ethics: Its Nature and Scope’, Computers and Society 36(3), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. 2005c. ‘Presence: From Epistemic Failure to Successful Observability’, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14(6), 656–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. 2005d. ‘The Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy,’ Ethics and Information Technology 7(4), 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. 2006a. ‘Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(3), 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. 2006b. ‘Information Technologies and the Tragedy of the Good Will’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(4), 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. 2006c. ‘Informational Privacy and its Ontological Interpretation’, Computers and Society 36(3), 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. 2007a. ‘A Look into the Future Impact of ICT on Our Lives’, The Information Society 23(1), 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L., 2007b. ‘Understanding Information Ethics’, APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers 7(1), http://76.12.57.18/publications/newsletters/v07n1_Computers_04.aspx

Floridi, L. 2008a. ‘Artificial Intelligence's New Frontier: Artificial Companions and the Fourth Revolution’, Metaphilosophy 39 (4/5), 651–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. 2008b. ‘The Method of Levels of Abstraction’, Minds and Machines, 18(3), 303–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. 2008c. ‘Replies to “Commentaries on Floridi”’, APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, 72.Google Scholar

Floridi, L. 2008d. ‘Information Ethics, its Nature and Scope’, in Hoven, J. and Weckert, J. (eds.), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, pp. 40–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Floridi, L. 2008e. ‘Foundations of Information Ethics’ in Himma, K. E. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, pp. 3–23. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Floridi, L. 2008f. ‘A Defence of Informational Structural Realism’, Synthese 161(2), 219–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. (forthcoming, a). ‘The Information Society and Its Philosophy’, The Information Society.

Floridi, L. (forthcoming, b). Response to S. Hongladarom in special issue of Floridi and his Critics

Floridi, L. (forthcoming, c). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Floridi, L., and Sanders, J. W. 1999. ‘Entropy as Evil in Information Ethics’, Etica & Politica, special issue on Computer Ethics 1(2).Google Scholar

Floridi, L. and Sanders, J. W. 2001. ‘Artificial Evil and the Foundation of Computer Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 3, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. and Sanders, J. W. 2002. ‘Mapping the Foundationalist Debate in Computer Ethics,’ Ethics and Information Technology 4(1), 1–9. A revised version is printed in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), Readings in Cyberethics (2nd edn), pp. 84–95. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. and Sanders, J. W. 2004. ‘On the Morality of Artificial Agents’. Minds and Machines 14(3), 349–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. and Sanders, J. W. 2005. ‘Internet Ethics: The Constructionist Values of Homo Poieticus’, in Cavalier, R. (ed.), The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives, pp. 195–214. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Foot, P. 1967. ‘The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect’, Oxford Review 5, 5–15.Google Scholar

Foster, K. R. and Jaeger, J. (forthcoming). ‘Ethical Implications of Implantable Radiofrequency Identification Tags in Humans’, American Journal of Bioethics.

Frankena, W. 1973. Ethics (2nd edn). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1917. ‘A Difficulty in the Path of Psycho-Analysis’, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, XVII(1917–1919), pp. 135–144.Google Scholar

Friedman, B. (ed.) 1997. Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Friedman, B. and Freier, N. 2005. ‘Value Sensitive Design’, in Fisher, E., Erdelez, S. and McKechnie, E. (eds.), Theories of Information Behavior: A Researcher's Guide. Medford, NJ: Information Today.Google Scholar

Friedman, B., Howe, D. and Felten, E. 2002. ‘Informed Consent in the Mozilla Browser: Implementing Value-Sensitive Design’, in Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences. Abstract, p. 247; CD-ROM of full-paper, OSPE101. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar

Friedman, B. and Kahn, P. 2003. ‘Human Values, Ethics, and Design’, in Jacko, J. and Sears, A. (eds.), The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. and Borning, A. 2006. ‘Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems’ in Zhang, P. and Galletta, D. (eds.), Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems. Foundations, New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H.. and Borning, A. 2008. ‘Value Sensitive Design and Information System’, in Himma, K. E. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, pp. 69–102. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, B., Lin, P. and Miller, J. K. 2005. ‘Informed Consent by Design’, in Cranor, L. F. and Garfinkel, S. (eds.), Designing Secure Systems that People Can Use. O'Reilly.Google Scholar

Friedman, B. and Nissenbaum, H. 1996. ‘Bias in Computer Systems’, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 14(3), 330–347.Google Scholar

Friedman, T. 2005. ‘It's a Flat World, After All’, New York Times, 3 April. www.nytimes.com/2005/04/03/magazine/03DOMINANCE.htmlGoogle Scholar

Froomkin, A. Michael. 2001. ‘The Collision of Trademarks, Domain Names, and Due Process in Cyberspace’, Communications of the ACM 44(2), 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukuyama, F. 2002. Our Posthuman Future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Fulcher, G. 1989. Disabling Policies? London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Gall, C. and Waal, T. 1998. Chechnya: Calamity in the Caucasus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Gallie, W. B. 1956. ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56, 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galston, W. A. 2002. Liberal Pluralism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardiner, S. M. 2006. ‘A Core Precautionary Principle’, Journal of Political Philosophy 14(1), 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gemmey, J., Bell, G., Lueder, R., Drucker, S. and Wong, C. 2002 ‘MyLifeBits: Fulfilling the Memex Vision’, ACM Multimedia '02, 1–6 December 2002, Juan-les-Pins, France, pp. 235–238. Retrieved January 2008 from http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=64165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, Carlisle E. 2006. ‘Copyright Management Systems: Accessing the Power Balance’, in Zielinski, C., Duquenoy, P. and Kimppa, K. (eds.), The Information Society: Emerging Landscapes (IFIP WG 9.2 Proceedings), pp. 211–222. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gert, B. 1998. Morality: Its Nature and Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gert, Bernard. 1999. ‘Common Morality and Computing’, Ethics and Information Technology 1(1), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghemawat, P. 2007. ‘Why the World Isn't Flat’, Foreign Policy 159 (March/April), 54–60.

,Global Forum for Health Research. ‘The 10/90 Gap’, www.globalforumhealth.org/

Goggin, G. and Newell, C. 2000. ‘An End to Disabling Policies? Toward Enlightened Universal Service’, The Information Society 16, 127–133.Google Scholar

Goggin, G. and Newell, C. 2006. ‘Disability, Identity, and Interdependence: ICTs and New Social Forms’, Information, Communication and Society 9(3), 309–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goode, R. 2004. Commercial Law (3rd edn). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Goodstein, A. 2007. Totally Wired: What Teens and Tweens are Really Doing Online. St Martin's: Griffin.Google Scholar

Goodwin, I. 2004. ‘Book Reviews: The Virtual Community’, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 1(1), 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Górniak-Kocikowska, K. 1996. ‘The Computer Revolution and the Problem of Global Ethics’, Global Information Ethics (a special issue of Science and Engineering Ethics) 2(2), 177–190.Google Scholar

Gotterbarn, D. 1995. ‘Computer Ethics: Responsibility Regained’, in Johnson, D. G. and Nissenbaum, H. (eds.), Computers, Ethics and Social Values, pp. 18–24. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Gowans, C. W. 1987. Moral Dilemmas. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Greco, G. M. and Floridi, L. 2004. ‘The Tragedy of the Digital Commons’, Ethics and Information Technology 6(2), 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenhill, A. and Wilson, M. 2006. ‘Haven or Hell? Telework, Flexibility and Family in the E-Society: A Marxist Analysis’, European Journal of Information Systems 15(3), 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grier, D. A. 2005. When Computers Were Human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. 1993. “How We Do Ethics Now', in Phillips Griffiths, A. (ed.), Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. 1996. Value Judgement: Improving Our Ethical Beliefs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Griffiths, M. and Light, B. 2008. ‘Social Networking and Digital Gaming Media Convergence: Consequences for Appropriation in Habbo Hotel’, Under the Mask: Perspectives on the Gamer Conference, the Research Institute for Media, Art and Design, University of Bedfordshire.Google Scholar

Grodzinsky, F. S., Miller, K. W. and Wolf, M. J. 2008. ‘The Ethics of Designing Artificial Agents’, Ethics and Information Technology 10, 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grundy, F. 1996. Women and Computing. Exeter: Intellect.Google Scholar

Gutman, A. and Thompson, D. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1983. Moralbewußtsein und Kommunikatives Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1993. ‘Remarks on Discourse Ethics’, in Justification and Application, pp. 19–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hacker, K. and Mason, S. M. 2003. ‘Ethical Gaps in Studies of the Digital Divide’, Ethics and Information Technology 5(2), 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haga, S. B. and Willard, H. F. 2006. ‘Defining the Spectrum of Genome Policy’, Nature Reviews Genetics 7(12), 966–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haldane, J. H. 2003. ‘Natural Law and Ethical Pluralism’, in Madsen, R. and Strong, T. B. (eds.), The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World, pp. 89–114. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hallion, R. 1992. Storm Over Iraq. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H. (eds.). 1989. Plato, The Collected Dialogues. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hanson, R. 1994. ‘If Uploads Come First’, Extropy 6(2). http://hanson.gmu.edu/uploads.htmlGoogle Scholar

Hare, R. M. 1984. ‘Supervenience’. Paper read at Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 56.

Harvey, L. 1990. Critical Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar

Held, D. and McGrew, A. 2001. ‘Globalization’ in Krieger, J. (ed.), Oxford Companion to Politics of the World. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Also available online at www.polity.co.uk/global/globocp.htm.Google Scholar

Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. 1999. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Henwood, F. 1993. ‘Establishing Gender Perspectives on Information Technology: Problems Issues and Opportunities’, in Green, E., Owen, J. and Pain, D. (eds.), Gendered by Design? Information Technology and Office Systems, pp. 31–49. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Hepburn, R. W. 1984. ‘Wonder’ and Other Essays: Eight Studies in Aesthetics and Neighbouring Fields. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Herold, K. 2005. ‘A Buddhist Model for the Informational Person’, Proceedings of the Second Asia Pacific Computing and Philosophy Conference, 7–9 January, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar

Herring, S. 1996. ‘Posting in a Different Voice: Gender and Ethics in CMC’, in Ess, C. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication, pp. 115–145. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heymann, P. 2003. Terrorism, Security, and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Himanen, P. 2001. The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar

Himma, K. E. 2003. ‘The Relationship between the Uniqueness of Computer Ethics and Its Independence as a Discipline in Applied Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 5(4), 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Himma, K. E. 2004. ‘There's Something About Mary: The Moral Value of Things Qua Information Objects’, Ethics and Information Technology 6(3), 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Himma, K. E. 2007a. ‘Foundational Issues in Information Ethics’, Library Hi Tech 25(1), 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Himma, K. E. 2007b. ‘Artificial Agency, Consciousness, and the Criteria for Moral Agency: What Properties Must an Artificial Agent Have to be a Moral Agent?’, SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=983503

Himma, K. E. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.) 2008. The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRef

Hinman, L. 2002. ‘The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives in Academia’, Ethics and Information Technology 4(1), 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinman, L. 2004. ‘Virtual Virtues: Reflections on Academic Integrity in the Age of the Internet’, in Cavalier, R. (ed.), The Internet and Our Moral Lives, pp. 49–68. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Hinman, L. 2008. Ethics: A Pluralistic Approach to Moral Theory (4th edn). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. 1969. Bandits. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Hodel, T. B., Holderegger, A. and Lüthi, A. 1998. ‘Ethical Guidelines for a Networked World under Construction’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(9–10), 1057–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, J. H. 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Hollis, D. 2007. ‘Rules of Cyberwar?’, The Los Angeles Times, 8 October.Google Scholar

Hongladarom, S. 2004. ‘Making Information Transparent as a Means to Close the Global Digital Divide’, Minds and Machines 14(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hongladarom, S. 2007. ‘Analysis and Justification of Privacy from a Buddhist Perspective’, in Hongladarom, S. and Ess, C. (eds.), Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives, pp. 108–122. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hongladarom, S. 2008. ‘Floridi and Spinoza on Global Information Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 10(2–3), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoque, K. and Noon, M. 2004. ‘Equal Opportunities Policy and Practice in Britain: Evaluating the “empty shell” hypothesis’, Work, Employment and Society 18(3), 418–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, M., Andreopoulos, G. and Shulman, M. 1994. The Laws of War. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Huizinga, J. 1998. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Abingdon: Routledge. First published in 1938 with the title Homo Ludens : Proeve Eener Bepaling Van Het Spel-Element Der Cultuur. Haarlem: H. D. Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar

Huxley, A. 2006. Brave New World. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.Google Scholar

Ihde, D. 1990, Technology and the Lifeworld. Bloomington/Minneapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Ihde, D. 1998. Expanding Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

,Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones. 2000. ‘Mobile phones and health’, www.iegmp.org.uk/

Inness, J. C. 1992. Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

,International Herald Tribune, Europe. 2008. ‘Heathrow Begins Requiring Iris scans, Fingerprints from Some Passengers’, the Associated Press. 1 February. www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/02/01/europe/EU-GEN-Britain-Heathrow-Biometric-Data.php

,Internet World Stats: Usage and Population Statistics. 2008. World Internet Users: March 2008. www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

Introna, L. 2005. ‘Disclosive Ethics and Information Technology: Disclosing Facial Recognition Systems’, Ethics and Information Technology 7(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Introna, L. 2007. ‘Maintaining the Reversibility of Foldings: Making the Ethics (Politics) of Information Technology Visible’, Ethics and Information Technology 9(1), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Introna, L. 2008. ‘Phenomenological Approaches to Ethics and Information Technology’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 edition).

Introna, L. and Nissenbaum, H. 2000. ‘Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters’, The Information Society 16(3), 1–17.Google Scholar

Jackson, P., Gharavi, H. and Klobas, J. 2006. ‘Technologies of the Self: Virtual Work and the Inner Panopticon’, Information Technology and People 19(3), 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jerrard, A. A. and Chang, T. Y. 2003. ‘A Case Study of How Technology and Trust Enable the Projectized Team-Based Organization’, in Joia, Luiz Antonio (ed.), IT-Based Management: Challenges and Solutions, pp. 111–129. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, D. G. 1985. Computer Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. (2nd edn, 1994; 3rd edn, 2001.)Google Scholar

Johnson, D. G. 1997. ‘Is the Global Information Infrastructure a Democratic Technology?’, Computers and Society 27, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, D. G. 2000. ‘Should Computer Programs be Owned?’, in Baird, R. M., Ramsower, R. and Rosenbaum, S. E. (eds.), Cyberethics – Social and Moral Issues in the Computer Age, pp. 222–235. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. G. 2006. ‘Computer Systems: Moral Entities but Not Moral Agents’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(4), 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, D. G. and Miller, K. W. 2008. ‘Un-making Artificial Moral Agents’, Ethics and Information Technology 10, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnstone, J. 2007. ‘Technology as Empowerment: A Capability Approach to Computer Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 9(1), 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jonas, H. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jones, R. A. L. 2007. ‘Debating Nanotechnologies’, in Allhof, F., Lin, P., Moor, J. and Weckert, J. (eds.) Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology, pp. 71–79. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar

Jordan, T. and Taylor, P. A. 2004. Hacktivism and Cyberwars: Rebels With a Cause? London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel 1952. The Critique of Judgment. Trans. Meredith, J. M.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Kass, L. 2003. ‘Ageless Bodies, Happy Souls: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Perfection’, The New Atlantis, Spring, 9–28.Google Scholar

Kim, T. K. 2005. ,‘Electronic Storm: Stormfront Grows a Thriving Neo-Nazi Community’, Intelligence Report, Southern Poverty Law Center, Summer 2005. www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=551

Klein, N. 2000. No Logo: No Space, No Choice, No Jobs. London: Flamingo.Google Scholar

Klein, Naomi. 2008. ‘China's All-Seeing Eye’, Rolling Stone Magazine (29 May). www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/20797485/chinas_allseeing_eyeGoogle Scholar

Kleinig, J. 1982. ‘The Ethics of Consent’, in Neilsen, K. and Patten, S. C. (eds.), New Essays in Ethics and Public Policy. Guelph, Ontario: Canadian Association for Publishing in Philosophy.Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. M. 2003. ‘The Dependence of Value on Humanity’, in Raz, J., The Practice of Value, pp. 63–86. (ed.) J. Wallace, R.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Kreps, D. and Adam, A. 2006. ‘Failing the Disabled Community?: The Continuing Problem of Web Accessibility’, in Zaphiris, P. and Kurniawan, S. (eds.), Human Computer Interaction Research in Web Design and Evaluation. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar

Kroes, P. (forthcoming). The Moral Significance of Technical Artefacts.

Kroes, P. and Meijers, A. 2006. ‘The Dual Nature of Technical Artefacts’, Studies in History and Philosophy 37, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, J. 2000. ‘Ethics and the Computer World – A New Challenge for Philosophers’, in Baird, R. M., Ramsower, R. and Rosenbaum, S. E. (eds.), Cyberethics – Social and Moral Issues in the Computer Age, pp. 44–55. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Latour, B. 1992, ‘Where are the Missing Masses? – The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artefacts’, in Bijker, W. E. and Law, J. (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society, pp. 225–258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. 2002. ‘Morality and Technology: The End of the Means’, Theory, Culture and Society 19(5–6), 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laurent, L. and Petit, J. C. 2005. ‘Nanoscience and Its Convergence with Other Technologies’, Hyle 11(1), 45–76.Google Scholar

Law, J. and Hassard, J. 1999. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lebedev, M. A. and Nicolelis, M. A. L. 2006. ‘Brain Machine Interfaces: Past, Present, and Future’, Trends in Neurosciences 29(9), 536–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leone, R. and Anrig, G. 2004. The War on Our Freedoms: Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism. New York: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar

Leopold, A. 1949. The Sand County Almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lessig, L. 1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Lessig, L. 2006. Code: Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Lewis, S. 2004. ‘How Much is Stronger DRM Worth?’, in Camp, L. J. and Lewis, S. (eds.), Economics of Information Security, pp. 53–57. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Libicki, M. 2007. Conquest in Cyberspace: National Security and Information Warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieven, A. 1998. Chechnya: Tombstone of Russian Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Liu, Z. and Sarkar, S. 2007. ‘Outdoor Recognition at a Distance by Fusing Gait and Face’, Image and Vision Computing 25(6), 817–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, S. 2006. Programming the Universe. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Lohn, J. D. and Hornsby, G. S. 2006. ‘Evolvable Hardware: Using Evolutionary Computation to Design and Optimize Hardware Systems’, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 1, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lü, Y. 2005. ‘Privacy and Data Privacy Issues in Contemporary China’, Ethics and Information Technology 7(1), 7–15.Google Scholar

Ludlow, P. 1996. High Noon on the Electronic Frontier: Conceptual Issues in Cyberspace. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ludlow, P. and Wallace, M. 2007. The Second Life Herald: The Virtual Tabloid that Witnessed the Dawn of the Metaverse. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lyman, P. and Varian, H. R. 2003. ‘How Much Information?’, www.sims.berkeley.edu/research/projects/how-much-info-2003/execsum.htm#summary

Lyon, D. 1994. The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar

MacKinnon, R. 2008. ‘Asia's Fight for Web Rights’, Far Eastern Economic Review, April. www.feer.com/essays/2008/april/asias-fight-for-web-rights

Maner, W. 1980. Starter Kit in Computer Ethics. Hyde Park, NY: Helvetia Press and the National Information and Resource Center for Teaching Philosophy. (Originally self-published in 1978.)

Maner, W. 1996, ‘Unique Ethical Problems in Information Technology’, Global Information Ethics (a special issue of Science and Engineering Ethics) 2(2), 137–154.Google Scholar

Maner, W. 2004. ‘Unique Ethical Problems in Information Technology’, in Bynum, T. W. and Rogerson, S. (eds.), Computer Ethics and Professional Responsibilty, pp. 39–59. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Mann, S. 1997. ‘Wearable Computing: A First Step Toward Personal Imaging’, Computer 30(2), 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, S. 2001. ‘Wearable Computing: Toward Humanistic Intelligence’, IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(3), 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manson, N. A. 2002. ‘Formulating the Precautionary Principle’, Environmental Ethics 24, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manson, N. C. and O'Neill, O. 2007. ‘Rethinking Informed Consent’, in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marber, P. 2005. ‘Globalization and Its Contents’, World Policy Journal, Winter 2004/2005, 29–37.Google Scholar

Markoff, J. 2005. What the Dormouse Said: How the 60s Counterculture Shaped the Personal Computer. New York: Viking Adult.Google Scholar

Marquie, J. C., Jourdan-Boddaert, L. and Huet, N. 2002. ‘Do Older Adults Underestimate Their Actual Computer Knowledge?’, Behaviour and Information Technology 24(4), 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mason, R. O. 2000. ‘Intellectual Property and Open Systems’, in Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Mather, K. 2005. ‘Object Oriented Goodness: A Response to Mathiesen's “What Is Information Ethics?”’, Computers and Society 34(4).Google Scholar

Mathiesen, K. 2004. ‘What Is Information Ethics?’, Computers and Society, 32(8), www.computersandsociety.org/sigcas_ofthefuture2/sigcas/subpage/sub_page.cfm?article=909&page_number_nb=901

McCalman, J. 2003. ‘What Can We Do for Corporate Nomads? IT and Facilities Management’, in Joia, Luiz Antonio (ed.), IT-Based Management: Challenges and Solutions, pp. 130–142. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCormick, M. 2001. ‘Is It Wrong to Play Violent Video Games?’ Ethics and Information Technology 3(4), 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McFarland, M. C. 2001. ‘Intellectual Property, Information, and the Common Good’, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.) Readings in Cyberethics, pp. 252–262. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar

McKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (eds.) 1999. The Social Shaping of Technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

McLaughlin, B. and Bennet, K. 2005. ‘Supervenience’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supervenience/

McSorley, K. 2003. ‘The Secular Salvation Story of the Digital Divide’, Ethics and Information Technology 5(2), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mellor, C. 2004. ‘Google's Storage Strategy’, TechWorld (6 April).

Michelfelder, D. 2001. ‘The Moral Value of Informational Privacy in Cyberspace’, Ethics and Information Technology 3(2), 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Microsoft-Research 2005. ‘The Towards 2020 Science’.

Midgley, Mary. 1996. ‘Trying Out One's New Sword’, in Arthur, J. (ed.), Morality and Moral Controversies (4th edn), pp. 116–119. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Midgley, M. 1985. ‘Persons and Non-Persons’, in Singer, P. (ed.), Defence of Animals, pp. 52–62. Oxford: BasilBlackwell.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 2007. On Liberty and The Subjection of Women. New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

Miller, S. and Weckert, J. 2000. ‘Privacy, the Workplace and the Internet’, Journal of Business Ethics 28, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moor, J. H. 1985. ‘What is Computer Ethics’, Metaphilosophy 16(4), 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moor, J. H. 1998. ‘Reason, Relativity and Responsibility in Computer Ethics’, Computers and Society 28(1), 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moor, J. H. 1999. ‘Just Consequentialism and Computing’, Ethics and Information Technology 1(1), 65–69.Google Scholar

Moor, J. H. 2001. ‘Just Consequentialism and Computing’, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T (eds.), Readings in Cyberethics, pp. 98–105. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar

Moor, J. H. 2006. ‘The Nature, Importance, and Difficulty of Machine Ethics’, IEEE Intelligent Systems 21, 18–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, G. 1965. ‘Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits’, Electronics 38, 114–117.Google Scholar

Moores, T. T. and Chang, J. 2006. ‘Ethical Decision Making in Software Privacy: Initial Development and Test of a Four-Component Model’, MIS Quarterly 30(1), 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, R. 2008. ‘,Juicy Campus: College Gossip Leaves the Bathroom Wall and Goes Online’, International Herald Tribune, 18 March. www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/18/arts/gossip.php

Moser, I. 2006. ‘Disability and the Promises of Technology: Technology, Subjectivity and Embodiment within an Order of the Normal’, Information, Communication and Society 9(3), 373–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moss, J. 2002. ‘Power and the Digital Divide’, Ethics and Information Technology 4(2), 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Naess, A. 1973. ‘The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement’, Inquiry 16, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, T. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. 1987. ‘The Fragmentation of Value’, in Gowans, C. W. Moral Dilemmas, pp. 174–187. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nakada, M. and Tamura, T. 2005. ‘Japanese Conceptions of Privacy: An Intercultural Perspective’, Ethics and Information Technology 7(1), 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nash, R. F. 1989. The Rights of Nature. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

,National Institute of Health. ‘Nuremburg Code’http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/index.html.]

,Nature. 2006, ‘2020 – Future of Computing’, 440.

Nietzsche, F. W. 2003. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Horstmann, R.-P. (ed.); Judith Norman (trans). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nissenbaum, H. 1998. ‘Values in the Design of Computer Systems’, Computers and Society, March 1998, 38–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nissenbaum, H. 2001. ‘How Computer Systems Embody Values’, IEEE Computer 34, March, 118–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nissenbaum, H. 2004. ‘Privacy as Contextual Integrity’, Washington Law Review 79, 119–158.Google Scholar

Nozick, R. 1993. The Nature of Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

,Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2003. Pharmacogenetics: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council On Bioethics.Google Scholar

Ofcom, 2008. ‘The Communications Market 2008’, www.ofcom.org.uk/research/cm/cmr08/

O'Neill, O. 2004. ‘Modern Moral Philosophy and the Problem of Relevant Descriptions’, in Modern Moral Philosophy, pp. 301–316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Reilly, T. 2005. ‘What Is Web 2.0 – Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software’, www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html

Ortega Y Gasset, J. 1961. ‘Man the Technician’, in Weyl, H. (trans.), History as a System: And Other Essays Toward a Philosophy of History, pp. 87–161. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Orwell, G. 1949. Nineteen Eighty-Four. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar

Ossorio, Pilar N. 2006. ‘About Face: Forensic Genetic Testing for Race and Visible Traits’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34(2), 277–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pape, R. 1996. Bombing to Win. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Parker, D. 1968. ‘Rules of Ethics in Information Processing’, Communications of the ACM 11, 198–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, D. 1979. Ethical Conflicts in Computer Science and Technology. Arlington, VA: AFIPS Press.Google Scholar

Parker, D.et al. 1990. Ethical Conflicts in Information and Computer Science, Technology and Business. Wellesley, MA: QED Information Sciences.Google Scholar

Paterson, B. 2007. ‘We Cannot Eat Data: The Need for Computer Ethics to Address the Cultural and Ecological Impacts of Computing’, in Hongladarom, S. and Ess, C. (eds.), Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives, pp. 153–168. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patton, M. F. J. 1988. ‘Tissues in the Profession: Can Bad Men Make Good Brains Do Bad Things?’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 61(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

PBS Online. 1998. ‘Nerds 2.0.1: Wiring the World’, www.pbs.org/opb/nerds2.0.1/wiring_world/

Pearson, C. and Watson, N. 2007. ‘Tackling Disability Discrimination in the United Kingdom: The British Disability Discrimination Act’, Journal of Law and Policy 23: 95–120. http://law.wustl.edu/Journal.index.asp?ID=5697

Pennell, C. 2001. Bandits at Sea: A Pirates Reader. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Pennings, J. 1998. ‘Innovations as Precursors of Organizational Performance’, in Galliers, R. D. and Baets, W. R. J. (eds.), Information Technology and Organizational Transformation: Innovation for the 21st Century, pp. 153–178. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Phillips, A. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Phillips, J. and Firth, A. 2001. Introduction to Intellectual Property Law (4th edn). London: Butterworths LexisNexis.Google Scholar

Plant, S. 1997. Zeros and Ones. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar

,Plato. 1993. Symposium, Robin Waterfield (ed. and trans.). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pohl, F. 1981. The Cool War. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar

Posner, R. A. 1997, ‘Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory’, The Harvard Law Review 111, 1637–1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potter, S. M., Wagenaar, D. A. and DeMarse, T. B. 2006. ‘Closing the Loop: Stimulation Feedback Systems for Embodied MEA Cultures’, in Taketani, M. and Baudry, M. (eds.), Advances in Network Electrophysiology Using Multi-Electrode Arrays, pp. 215–242. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, H. 2004. Ethics Without Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, R. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Rattray, G. 2001. Strategic Warfare in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice (rev. edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rees, T. L. 1998. Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Reidenberg, J. R. 2000. ‘Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace’, Stanford Law Review 52, 1315–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rheingold, H. 2000. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier (2nd edn). Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rosen, J. 2004. The Naked Crowd: Reclaiming Security and Freedom in an Anxious Age. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Ross, D.et al. (eds.) 2000. Dennett's Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

,Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering. 2004. ‘Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties’, www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm

Rucker, R. 2006. The Lifebox, the Seashell, and the Soul: What Gnarly Computation Taught Me About Ultimate Reality, the Meaning of Life, and How to Be Happy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Saletan, W. 2005. ‘The Beam in Your Eye: If Steroids are Cheating Why isn't LASIK?’, Slate, 18 April. www.slate.com/id/2116858/

Samuelson, P. and Scotchmer, S. 2002. ‘The Law and Economics of Reverse Engineering’, The Yale Law Journal 111(7), 1575–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandberg, A. and Bostrom, N. 2007. ‘Cognitive Enhancement: A Review of Technology’, www.enhanceproject.org/documents/Cognitive%20Enhancement%20Tech%20Review.pdf

Sandel, M. 2007. The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sandin, P. 2007. ‘Common Sense Precaution and Varieties of the Precautionary Principle’, in Lewen, T. (ed.), Risk: Philosophical Perspectives, pp. 99–112. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Saponas, T. S., Jonathan, L., Carl, H., Sameer, A. and Tadayoshi, K. (eds.) 2007. Special issue on ‘Devices That Tell on You: Privacy Trends in Consumer Ubiquitous Computing’, USENIX Association.

Schelling, T. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Schiffman, B. 2008. ‘Turns Out Porn Isn't Recession-Proof’, Wired Blog Network, http://blog.wired.com/business/2008/07/turns-out-por-1.html

Schneiderman, F. B. (ed.) 1999. Trust in Cyberspace. Washington, DC:National Academic Press.

Schrödinger, E. 1944. What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Seife, C. 2006. Decoding the Universe: How the New Science of Information is Explaining Everything in the Cosmos, from Our Brains to Black Holes. New York: Viking, the Penguin Group.Google Scholar

Servon, L. 2002. Bridging the Digital Divide: Technology, Community, and Public Policy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Severson, R. J. 1997. The Principles of Information Ethics. New York: Armonk and London: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, T. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shapira, N., Barak, A. and Gal, I. 2007. ‘Promoting Older Adults’ Well-being through Internet Training and Use'. Aging and Mental Health, 11(5), 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shrader-Frechette, K. and Westra, L. (eds.) 1997. Technology and Values. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Sicart, M. 2005. ‘On the Foundations of Evil in Computer Game Cheating’, Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association's 2nd International Conference – Changing Views: Worlds in Play, June 16–20, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar

Sicart, M. and Studies, G. 2009. The Ethics of Computer Games. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siponen, M. 2004. ‘A Pragmatic Evaluation of the Theory of Information Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 6(4), 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siponen, M. and Vartiainen, T. 2002. ‘Teaching End-User Ethics: Issues and a Solution Based on Universalizability’, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 8, 422–443.Google Scholar

Small, Luc. 2007. ‘Theft in a Wireless World’, Ethics and Information Technology 9, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smart, A., Martin, P. and Parker, M. 2004. ‘Tailored Medicine: Whom Will it Fit? The Ethics of Patient and Disease Stratification’, Bioethics 18(4), 322–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, B. A. O. 1987. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (First published 1973, reprinted with corrections and supplementary bibliography.)Google Scholar

Smith, M. M. 1996. ‘Information Ethics: An Hermeneutical Analysis of an Emerging Area in Applied Ethics’, PhD thesis, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, D.C.

Smith, M. M. 2002, ‘Global Information Ethics: A Mandate for Professional Education’, Proceedings of the 68th IFLA Council and General Conference, Glasgow. Also available online at www.ifla.org/IV/ifla68/papers/056-093e.pdf.

Som, C., Hilty, L. M. and Ruddy, T. F. 2004. ‘The Precautionary Principle in the Information Society’, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 10, 787–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spencer, R. 2008. ‘Footprints Faked, Admit Organizers’, The Age, www.theage.com.au/news/latest-news/footprints-faked-admit-organisers/2008/08/11/1218306780009.html

Spier, R. M. 2001. Science and Technology Ethics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Spinello, R. A. 2000. Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace. London: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar

Spinello, R. A. 2003. ‘The Future of Intellectual Property’, Ethics and Information Technology 5(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T. 2005. ‘Intellectual Property Rights: From Theory to Practical Implementation’, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights in a Networked World: Theory and Practice, pp. 1–65. Hershey, PA: INFOSCI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stahl, B. C. 2005. ‘The Impact of Open Source Development on the Social Construction of Intellectual Property’, in Koch, S. (ed.) Free/Open Source Software Development, pp. 259–272. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stahl, B. C. 2007. ‘Social Justice and Market Metaphysics: A Critical Discussion of Philosophical Approaches to Digital Divides’, in Rookby, E. and Weckert, J. (eds.) Information Technology and Social Justice, pp. 148–170. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stahl, B. C. 2008a. ‘Empowerment through ICT: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Egyptian ICT Policy’, in Proceedings of the Human Choice and Computers 8 Conference, 25–27 September 2008, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar

Stahl, B. C. 2008b. Information Systems: Critical Perspectives. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stahl, B. C. 2008c. ‘The Ethical Nature of Critical Research in Information Systems’, Information Systems Journal 18(2), special issue on ‘Exploring the Critical Agenda in IS Research’, Brooke, C., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. and Klein, H. K. (eds.), 137–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stallman, R. 1995. ‘Why Software Should Be Free’, in Johnson, D. G. and Nissenbaum, H. (eds.), Computers, Ethics and Social Values, pp. 190–200. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Stanton, J. M. and Julian, A. L. 2002, ‘The Impact of Electronic Monitoring on Quality and Quantity of Performance’, Computers in Human Behavior 18(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stienstra, D. 2006. ‘The Critical Space between: Access, Inclusion and Standards in Information Technologies’, Information, Communication and Society 9(6), 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stuart, S. 2008. ‘From Agency to Apperception: Through Kinaesthesia to Cognition and Creation’. (Special issue on Kant and Information Ethics), Ethics and Information Technology.

Sullins, J. P. 2006a. ‘Ethics and Artificial Life: From Modeling to Moral Agents’. Ethics and Information Technology 7(3), 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sullins, J. P. 2006b. ‘When Is a Robot a Moral Agent?’, International Review of Information Ethics 6, 23–30.Google Scholar

Sullins, J. P. 2007. ‘Friends by Design: A Design Philosophy for Personal Robotics Technology’, in Vermaas, P. E., Kroes, P., Light, A. and Moore, S. A. (eds.), Philosophy and Design: From Engineering to Architecture. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Sullins, J. P. 2008. ‘The Role of Artificial Moral Agency in Technoethics’, in Handbook of Research on Technoethics, New York: Idea Group Inc.Google Scholar

,Sunderland City Council 2008. ‘Digital Challenge’, www.sunderland.gov.uk/wherepeoplematter/

Sunstein, C. 2001. republic.com. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. 2005. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tavani, H. T. 1999. ‘Informational Privacy, Data Mining, and the Internet’, Ethics and Information Technology 1(2), 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tavani, H. T. 2002. ‘The Uniqueness Debate in Computer Ethics: What Exactly Is at Issue, and Why Does it Matter?’, Ethics and Information Technology 4(1), 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tavani, H. T. 2005. ‘The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Condition: Do We Need a New Framework of Ethics’, in Cavalier, R. (ed.), The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives, pp. 215–238. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Tavani, H. T. 2007. Ethics and Technology: Ethical Issues in an Age of Information and Communication Technology (2nd edn). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Tavani, H. T. 2008. ‘Floridi's Ontological Theory of Informational Privacy: Some Implications and Challenges’, Ethics and Information Technology 10(2–3), 155–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tavani, H. T. 2010. Ethics and Technology: Controversies: Questions and Strategies for Ethical Computing. (3rd edn) Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. 2002. ‘Democracy, Inclusive and Exclusive’, in Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swiderl, A. and Tipton, S. M. (eds.), Meaning and Modernity: Religion, Polity, and Self, pp. 181–194. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Tedjasaputra, A. 2007. ‘Digestible RFID Tag: An Alternative for Your Internal Body Monitoring’, RFID Community in Asia: www.rfid-asia.info/2007/02/digestible-rfid-tag-alternative-for.htm

Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R., 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

,The Economist, 18 December 1997, ‘1897 and 1997 – the Century the Earth Stood Still’.

,The High Court of Australia: Dow Jones and Company Inc v Gutnick [2002] HCA 56; 210 CLR 575; 194 ALR 433; 77 ALJR 255 (10 December 2002), www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2002/56.html

Thomas, J. 2004. ‘Cyberpoaching behind the keyboard: Uncoupling the ethics of “virtual infidelity”’, in Waskul, D. D. (ed.), net.seXXX: Readings on Sex, Pornography, and the Internet, pp. 149–77. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Thomas, T. 1997. ‘The Threat of Information Operations: A Russian Perspective’, in Pfaltzgraff, R. and Shultz, R. (eds.), War in the Information Age. London: Brassey's.Google Scholar

Thomasson, A. L. 2003. ‘Realism and Human Kinds’, in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXVII (3), 580–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, A. 1996. Hardware Evolution: Automatic Design of Electronic Circuits in Reconfigurable Hardware by Artificial Evolution. London: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Thorseth, M. 2006. ‘Worldwide Deliberation and Public Use of Reason Online’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(4), 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thorseth, M. 2007. ‘Ethical Pluralism’, in Collste, G. (ed.), Perspectives on Applied Ethics (Studies in Applied Ethics 10), pp. 41–55. Linköping: Centre for Applied Ethics, Linköping University.Google Scholar

Thorseth, M. 2008. ‘Reflective Judgment and Enlarged Thinking Online’, Ethics and Information Technology 10(4), 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torremans, P. 2005. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law (4th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Turilli, M. 2007. ‘Ethical Protocols Design’, Ethics and Information Technology 9, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turilli, M. 2008. ‘Ethics and the Practice of Software Design’, in Waelbers, K.Brey, P. A. and Briggle, A. (eds.), Current Issues in Computing and Philosophy, pp. 171–183. IOS Press.Google Scholar

Turing, A. M. 1950. ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, Mind 59, 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turkle, S. 2005. ‘Relational Artifacts/Children/Elders: The Complexities of Cybercompanions’. In ‘Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science. A CogSci-2005 Workshop’, Cognitive Science Society62–73. www.androidscience.com/proceedings2005/TurkleCogSci2005AS.pdfGoogle Scholar

Turkle, S., Taggart, W., Kidd, C. D. and Dasté, O. 2006. ‘Relational Artifacts with Children and Elders: The Complexities of Cybercompanionship’, Connection Science 18, 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, E. 1998. ‘The Case for Responsibility of the Computing Industry to Promote Equal Presentation of Women and Men in Advertising Campaigns’, ETHICOMP98, Rotterdam.Google Scholar

Turner, E. 1999. ‘Gender and Ethnicity of Computing, Perceptions of the Future Generation’, ETHICOMP99, Rome.Google Scholar

,UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) 1998. Human Development Report 1998. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

,United Nations. 1948. ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’, www.un.org/Overview/rights.html

,United Nations Environment Programme. 1992. ‘Rio Declaration on Environment and Development 1992’, www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?ArticleID=1163&DocumentID=78&l=en

,US Patent and Trademark Office. 2007. ‘United States Patent Application 20070300174’ Kind Code, A1, Macbeth; Steven, W. et al., (http://patft.uspto.gov) re US Patent Application 20070300174.

Amerongen, M. 2008, ‘The Interpretation of Artefacts’, Simon Stevin series in the Philosophy of Technology, Delft.Google Scholar

Caenegem, W. 2003. ‘Intellectual Property Law and the Idea of Progress’, Intellectual Property Quarterly 3, 237–256.Google Scholar

Delden, J., Bolt, I., Kalis, A., Derjiks, J. and Leufkins, H. 2004. ‘Tailormade Pharmacotherapy: Future Developments and Ethical Challenges in the Field of Pharmacogenomics’, Bioethics 18(4), 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoven, J. 1995. ‘Equal Access and Social Justice: Information as a Primary Good’, ETHICOMP9, Leicester: De Montfort University.Google Scholar

Hoven, J. 1997. ‘Computer Ethics and Moral Methodology’, Metaphilosophy 28(3), 234–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoven, J. 2005. ‘E-democracy, E-contestation and the Monitorial Citizen’, Ethics and Information Technology 7(2), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoven, J. 2008. ‘Moral Methodology and Information Technology’ in Himma, K. E. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), 2008. The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, pp. 49–69.

Hoven, J., Miller, S. and Pogge, T. (2010, forthcoming). The Design Turn in Applied Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hoven, J. and Rooksby, E. 2008. ‘Distributive Justice and the Value of Information: A (Broadly) Rawlsian Approach’, in Hoven, J. and Weckert, J. (eds.) Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, pp. 376–397. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hoven, J. and Vermaas, P. 2007. ‘Nano-technology and Privacy: On Continuous Surveillance outside the Panopticon’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32(3), 283–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoven, J. and Weckert, J. (eds.) 2008. Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Verbeek, P. P. 2005. What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar

Verton, D. 2003. Black Ice: The Invisible Threat of Cyber-Terrorism. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

W3C. 2004. ‘HTML and XHTML Frequently Answered Questions’. Available at www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq

Waddington, D. 2007. ‘Locating the Wrongness in Ultra-violent Video Games’, Ethics and Information Technology 9(2), 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar