Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Taking Stock of Explicit and Implicit Prejudice
- 1 Report from the NSF Conference on Implicit Bias
- Section I What is Implicit Bias and (How) Can We Measure It?
- Section II Do Measures of Implicit Bias Predict Cognition and Behavior?
- Introduction
- 6 The Impact of Implicit Racial Bias in Racial Health Disparities: A Practical Problem with Theoretical Implications
- 7 Revisiting the Measurement of Group Schemas in Political Science
- 8 Implicit Bias and Discrimination: Evidence on Causality
- 9 What Is the Unique Contribution of Implicit Measures in Predicting Political Choices?
- 10 Predicting Biased Voting Behavior with Implicit Attitude Measures: Results from a Voting Experiment and the 2008 Presidential Election
- Section III Challenges of Research on Implicit Bias
- Section IV Improving Measurement and Theorizing About Implicit Bias
- Section V How to Change Implicit Bias?
- Section VI Explicit Prejudice; Alive and Well?
- Section VII The Public’s (Mis)understanding of Implicit Bias
- Index
- References
9 - What Is the Unique Contribution of Implicit Measures in Predicting Political Choices?
from Section II - Do Measures of Implicit Bias Predict Cognition and Behavior?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2024
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Taking Stock of Explicit and Implicit Prejudice
- 1 Report from the NSF Conference on Implicit Bias
- Section I What is Implicit Bias and (How) Can We Measure It?
- Section II Do Measures of Implicit Bias Predict Cognition and Behavior?
- Introduction
- 6 The Impact of Implicit Racial Bias in Racial Health Disparities: A Practical Problem with Theoretical Implications
- 7 Revisiting the Measurement of Group Schemas in Political Science
- 8 Implicit Bias and Discrimination: Evidence on Causality
- 9 What Is the Unique Contribution of Implicit Measures in Predicting Political Choices?
- 10 Predicting Biased Voting Behavior with Implicit Attitude Measures: Results from a Voting Experiment and the 2008 Presidential Election
- Section III Challenges of Research on Implicit Bias
- Section IV Improving Measurement and Theorizing About Implicit Bias
- Section V How to Change Implicit Bias?
- Section VI Explicit Prejudice; Alive and Well?
- Section VII The Public’s (Mis)understanding of Implicit Bias
- Index
- References
Summary
How do implicit and explicit racial attitudes compare in their ability to predict political attitudes and behaviors? Data from existing studies suggest that implicit measures may be less relevant than explicit ones for predicting vote choice. This chapter replicates that result using data from 2008 and 2012 and considers whether the dominance of explicit measures in this domain can be attributed to the fact that voting is a highly considered action, wherein individuals may have taken steps to mitigate their own biases. To assess this, we use nationally representative panel survey data to examine whether the relative dominance of explicit measures over the Affect Misattribution Procedure was similarly true across the campaign season and for alternative outcomes that may have encouraged less cognitive control than voting. Results indicate that explicit measures were more predictive for the vast majority of political outcomes. This raises questions about the added value of considering implicit measures in addition to explicit ones when measuring political attitudes and behaviors.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism , pp. 262 - 278Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025