Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Taking Stock of Explicit and Implicit Prejudice
- 1 Report from the NSF Conference on Implicit Bias
- Section I What is Implicit Bias and (How) Can We Measure It?
- Section II Do Measures of Implicit Bias Predict Cognition and Behavior?
- Section III Challenges of Research on Implicit Bias
- Section IV Improving Measurement and Theorizing About Implicit Bias
- Introduction
- 15 Methodological Issues in the Study of Implicit Attitudes
- 16 The Bias of Crowds: Rethinking Implicit Bias in Social Context
- 17 Latent State–Trait Analyses for Process Models of Implicit Measures
- 18 Increasing the Validity of Implicit Measures: New Solutions for Assessment, Conceptualization, and Action Explanation
- 19 A Model of Moderated Convergence between Explicit Dispositions, Implicit Dispositions, and Behavior
- 20 Complications in Predicting Intergroup Behavior from Implicit Biases: One Size Does Not Fit All
- Section V How to Change Implicit Bias?
- Section VI Explicit Prejudice; Alive and Well?
- Section VII The Public’s (Mis)understanding of Implicit Bias
- Index
- References
Introduction
from Section IV - Improving Measurement and Theorizing About Implicit Bias
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2024
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Taking Stock of Explicit and Implicit Prejudice
- 1 Report from the NSF Conference on Implicit Bias
- Section I What is Implicit Bias and (How) Can We Measure It?
- Section II Do Measures of Implicit Bias Predict Cognition and Behavior?
- Section III Challenges of Research on Implicit Bias
- Section IV Improving Measurement and Theorizing About Implicit Bias
- Introduction
- 15 Methodological Issues in the Study of Implicit Attitudes
- 16 The Bias of Crowds: Rethinking Implicit Bias in Social Context
- 17 Latent State–Trait Analyses for Process Models of Implicit Measures
- 18 Increasing the Validity of Implicit Measures: New Solutions for Assessment, Conceptualization, and Action Explanation
- 19 A Model of Moderated Convergence between Explicit Dispositions, Implicit Dispositions, and Behavior
- 20 Complications in Predicting Intergroup Behavior from Implicit Biases: One Size Does Not Fit All
- Section V How to Change Implicit Bias?
- Section VI Explicit Prejudice; Alive and Well?
- Section VII The Public’s (Mis)understanding of Implicit Bias
- Index
- References
Summary
Recent decades have seen a series of attempts to further develop measures of implicit bias. Some observers have suggested drawing on lessons learned in the literature on optimal measurement of explicit bias to enhance implicit bias measures. Suggestions have also been made about how to improve meta-analyses of studies quantifying the strength of the link between implicit attitudes and behavior. For example, outdated statistical methods used in many meta-analyses of implicit bias may have led to incorrect inferences about the average effect sizes and can be avoided using newer techniques. Further improvement has been suggested to more effectively take into account omitted variables that may create spurious associations of implicit attitudes and behavior.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Implicit Bias and Racism , pp. 421 - 424Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 75–109). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2019). The IAT is dead, long live the IAT: Context-sensitive measures of implicit attitudes are indispensable to social and political psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418797309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klauer, K. C., Stahl, C., & Voss, A. (2012). Multinomial models and diffusion models. In Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., & Stahl, C. (Eds.), Cognitive Methods in Social Psychology (pp. 331–354). Guilford.Google Scholar
Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2008). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In Petty, R. E., Fazio, R. H., & Briñol, P. (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures (pp. 19–63). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28(4), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1335568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, M., Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., et al. (2015). A model of moderated convergence between direct, indirect, and behavioral measures of personality traits. In Ortner, T. M. & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (Eds.), Behavior Based Assessment: Going beyond Self Report in the Personality, Affective, Motivation, and Social Domains (pp. 29–44). Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Steyer, R., Geiser, C., & Fiege, C. (2012). Latent state-trait models. In Cooper, H., Camic, P. M., Long, D. L., et al. (Eds.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 3: Data Analysis and Research Publication. (pp. 291–308). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar