Assessing Group Interactions in Personality Psychology

doi:10.1017/9781316286302.042

41 - Assessing Group Interactions in Personality Psychology

The Münster Behavior Coding-System (M-BeCoSy)

from Personality and Team Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2018

Marc Grünberg ,

Jana Mattern ,

Katharina Geukes ,

Albrecht C. P. Küfner and

Edited by

Margarete Boos and

Elisabeth Brauner: Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Margarete Boos: Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Michaela Kolbe: Affiliation:
ETH Zürich

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 602 - 611

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316286302.042 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Primary Sources

Geukes, K., Nestler, S., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. (2016). PILS – Personality Interaction Laboratory Study. Retrieved January 1, 2018, from osf.io/q5zwp.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Back, M. D., & Kenny, D. A. (2010). The Social Relations Model: How to understand dyadic processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 855–870. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00303.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Back, M. D., & Nestler, S. (2016). Accuracy of judging personality. In Hall, J. A., Mast, M. Schmid, & West, T. V. (Eds.). The social psychology of perceiving others accurately (pp. 98–124). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316181959 CrossRef Google Scholar

Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 533–548. doi:10.1037/a0016229CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bakeman, R. (2000). Behavioral observation and coding. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 138–159). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996481 Google Scholar

Bettencourt, B. A., Talley, A., Benjamin, A. J., & Valentine, J. (2006). Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 751–777. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.751CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599–614. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cairns, R. B., & Green, J. A. (1979). How to assess personality and social patterns: Observations or ratings. In Cairns, R. B. (Ed.), The analysis of social interactions: Methods, issues, and illustrations (pp. 209–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Cuperman, R., & Ickes, W. (2009). Big Five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: Personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts “disagreeables.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97 (4), 667. doi:10.1037/a0015741CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1977). Facial action coding system. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Funder, D. C., Furr, R. M., & Colvin, C. R. (2000). The Riverside Behavioral Q-sort: A tool for the description of social behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 451–489. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00103CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2009). Behavioral observation. In Robins, R. W., Fraley, C., & Krueger, R. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 273–291). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Geukes, K., Breil, S. M., Hutteman, R., Nestler, S., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. D. (2017). Explaining the longitudinal interplay of personality and social relationships in the laboratory and in the field: The PILS and CONNECT study. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar

Geukes, K., Hutteman, R., Nestler, S., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. (2016, August 24). CONNECT. Retrieved February 16, 2018, from osf.io/2pmcr Google Scholar

Geukes, K., Nestler, S., Hutteman, R., Dufner, M., Küfner, A. C. P., Egloff, B., Denissen, J. J. A., & Back, M. D. (2017). Puffed up but shaky selves: State self-esteem level and variability in narcissists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 769–786. doi:10.1037/pspp0000093CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Geukes, K., Nestler, S., Hutteman, R., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. D. (2017). Trait personality and state variability: Predicting individual differences in within- and cross-context fluctuations in affect, self-evaluations, and behavior in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.003 CrossRef Google Scholar

Geukes, K., Nestler, S., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. (2016, July 1). PILS – Personality Interaction Laboratory Study. Retrieved February 16, 2018, from osf.io/q5zwp Google Scholar

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’—a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28, 76–81. doi:10.1159/000119004CrossRef Google Scholar

Leckelt, M., Küfner, A. C., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2015). Behavioral processes underlying the decline of narcissists’ popularity over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109 (5), 856–871. doi:10.1037/pspp0000057CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Leising, D., & Bleidorn, W. (2011). Which are the basic meaning dimensions of observable interpersonal behavior? Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 986–990. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.003CrossRef Google Scholar

Nestler, S., Grimm, K. J., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2015). The social consequences and mechanisms of personality: How to analyse longitudinal data from individual, dyadic, round-robin, and network designs. European Journal of Personality, 29, 272–295. doi:10.1002/per.1997CrossRef Google Scholar

Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395CrossRef Google Scholar

Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In Grove, W. M. & Ciccetti, D. (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Vol. 2. Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89–113). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar