Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Preface
- Organization of This Handbook
- How to Work with This Handbook
- Part I Background and Theory
- Part II Application Areas of Interaction Analysis
- Part III Methodology and Procedures of Interaction Analysis
- Part IV Data Analysis and Data Presentation
- Part V Coding Schemes for Interaction Research
- General Group Process Systems
- Argument, Conflict, and Negotiations
- Coordination and Coherence
- Cognition and Metacognition
- Personality and Team Behavior
- 39 The Behavior Analysis Coding System
- 40 Groupness/Entitativity Observational Coding (GEOC)
- 41 Assessing Group Interactions in Personality Psychology
- Roles and Relationships
- Appendix
- Index
- References
41 - Assessing Group Interactions in Personality Psychology
The Münster Behavior Coding-System (M-BeCoSy)
from Personality and Team Behavior
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Preface
- Organization of This Handbook
- How to Work with This Handbook
- Part I Background and Theory
- Part II Application Areas of Interaction Analysis
- Part III Methodology and Procedures of Interaction Analysis
- Part IV Data Analysis and Data Presentation
- Part V Coding Schemes for Interaction Research
- General Group Process Systems
- Argument, Conflict, and Negotiations
- Coordination and Coherence
- Cognition and Metacognition
- Personality and Team Behavior
- 39 The Behavior Analysis Coding System
- 40 Groupness/Entitativity Observational Coding (GEOC)
- 41 Assessing Group Interactions in Personality Psychology
- Roles and Relationships
- Appendix
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 602 - 611Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Primary Sources
Geukes, K., Nestler, S., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. (2016). PILS – Personality Interaction Laboratory Study. Retrieved January 1, 2018, from osf.io/q5zwp.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Back, M. D., & Kenny, D. A. (2010). The Social Relations Model: How to understand dyadic processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 855–870. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00303.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, M. D., & Nestler, S. (2016). Accuracy of judging personality. In Hall, J. A., Mast, M. Schmid, & West, T. V. (Eds.). The social psychology of perceiving others accurately (pp. 98–124). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316181959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 533–548. doi:10.1037/a0016229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakeman, R. (2000). Behavioral observation and coding. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 138–159). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996481Google Scholar
Bettencourt, B. A., Talley, A., Benjamin, A. J., & Valentine, J. (2006). Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 751–777. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.751CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599–614. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cairns, R. B., & Green, J. A. (1979). How to assess personality and social patterns: Observations or ratings. In Cairns, R. B. (Ed.), The analysis of social interactions: Methods, issues, and illustrations (pp. 209–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cuperman, R., & Ickes, W. (2009). Big Five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: Personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts “disagreeables.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97 (4), 667. doi:10.1037/a0015741CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1977). Facial action coding system. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C., Furr, R. M., & Colvin, C. R. (2000). The Riverside Behavioral Q-sort: A tool for the description of social behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 451–489. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2009). Behavioral observation. In Robins, R. W., Fraley, C., & Krueger, R. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 273–291). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Geukes, K., Breil, S. M., Hutteman, R., Nestler, S., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. D. (2017). Explaining the longitudinal interplay of personality and social relationships in the laboratory and in the field: The PILS and CONNECT study. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Geukes, K., Hutteman, R., Nestler, S., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. (2016, August 24). CONNECT. Retrieved February 16, 2018, from osf.io/2pmcrGoogle Scholar
Geukes, K., Nestler, S., Hutteman, R., Dufner, M., Küfner, A. C. P., Egloff, B., Denissen, J. J. A., & Back, M. D. (2017). Puffed up but shaky selves: State self-esteem level and variability in narcissists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 769–786. doi:10.1037/pspp0000093CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geukes, K., Nestler, S., Hutteman, R., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. D. (2017). Trait personality and state variability: Predicting individual differences in within- and cross-context fluctuations in affect, self-evaluations, and behavior in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geukes, K., Nestler, S., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. (2016, July 1). PILS – Personality Interaction Laboratory Study. Retrieved February 16, 2018, from osf.io/q5zwpGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’—a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28, 76–81. doi:10.1159/000119004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leckelt, M., Küfner, A. C., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2015). Behavioral processes underlying the decline of narcissists’ popularity over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109 (5), 856–871. doi:10.1037/pspp0000057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leising, D., & Bleidorn, W. (2011). Which are the basic meaning dimensions of observable interpersonal behavior? Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 986–990. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nestler, S., Grimm, K. J., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2015). The social consequences and mechanisms of personality: How to analyse longitudinal data from individual, dyadic, round-robin, and network designs. European Journal of Personality, 29, 272–295. doi:10.1002/per.1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In Grove, W. M. & Ciccetti, D. (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Vol. 2. Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89–113). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by