Andresen, J. T. (2014). Linguistics and evolution: A developmental approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, A. (2015). The use of signing space in a shared sign language of Australia. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton; Lancaster, UK: Ishara Press.Google Scholar

Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Coates, L., & Roe, L. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616729521401CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellugi, U., & Klima, E. (1975). Aspects of sign language and its structure. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Cutting, J. E. (Eds.), The role of speech in language (pp. 171–203). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bellugi, U., & Klima, E. (1976). Two faces of sign: Iconic and abstract. In Harnard, S. R., Steklis, H. D., & Lancaster, J. (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech (pp. 514–538). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays in body motion communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1946). Some thoughts on “yep” and “nope”. American Speech, 21, 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyes-Braem, P. & Sutton-Spence, R. (Eds.). (2001). The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign languages. Hamburg, Germany: Signum.Google Scholar

Butler, H. E. (1922). The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian, with an English translation by H. E. Butler. London, UK: William Heinemann.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2010). Some simple evo devo theses: How true might they be for language? In Larson, R. K., Déprez, V., & Yanakido, H. (Eds.), The evolution of human language: Biolinguistic perspectives (pp. 45–62). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, H. (2016). Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review, 123(3), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Condon, W. S. (1976). An analysis of behavioral organization. Sign Language Studies 13, 285–318. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1988.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cormier, K., Smith, S., & Sehyr Sevickova, Z. (2015). Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language and Linguistics, 18(2), 167–204. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.2.01corCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cormier, K., Quinto-Pozos, D., Sevickova, Z., & Schembri, A. (2012). Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Langauge and Communication, 32, 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2012.09.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic systems and intonation in English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cuxac, C. & Sallandre, M.-A. (2007). Iconicity and arbitrariness in French Sign Language: Highly iconic structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconicity. In Pizzuto, E., Pietandrea, P., & Simone, R. (Eds.), Verbal and signed languages: Comparing structures, concepts and methodologies (pp. 13–33). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. In two volumes. London, UK: John Murray.Google Scholar

Davis, J. E. (2010). Hand talk: Sign language among American Indian nations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

De Jorio, A. (2000). Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity. A translation of La Mimica Degli Antichi Investigata Nel Gestire Napoletano by Andrea De Jorio (1832) and with an introduction and notes by Adam Kendon. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Dor, D. (2015). The instruction of imagination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Efron, D. (1972). Gesture, race and culture (2nd ed.). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton. (Original publication 1941).Google Scholar

Emmorey, K. (Ed.) (2003). Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrara, L. & Halvorsen, R. P. (2017). Depicting and describing meanings with iconic sign in Norwegian Sign Language. Gesture, 16(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.00001.ferCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrara, L. & Hodge, G. (2018). Language as description, indication and depiction. Frontiers of Psychology, 9, Article 716. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00716CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fischer, S. & Gough, B. (1978). Verbs in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 18, 17–48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26203255CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floyd, S. (2016). Modally hybrid grammar? Celestial pointing for time-of-day reference in Nheengatú. Language, 92(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, L. (Ed.). (1977). On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York, NY: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S. & Brentari, D. (2017). Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, E46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15001247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gullberg, M. (2011). Language-specific encoding of placement events in gestures. In Pederson, E. & Bohnemeyer, J. (Eds.), Event representations in language and cognition (pp. 166–188). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harris, R. (1980). The language makers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hibbitts, B. J. (1992). “Coming to our senses”: Communication and legal expression in performance cultures. Emory Law Journal, 41(4), 873–960.Google Scholar

Hockett, C. (1976). In search of Jove’s Brow. American Speech, 53(4), 233–313.Google Scholar

Hockett, C. (1987). Refurbishing our foundations. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huttenlocher, J. (1975). Encoding information in sign language. In Kavanagh, J. & Cutting, J. (Eds.), The role of speech in language (pp. 229–240). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Johnston, T. & Schembri, A. (1999). On defining Lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 2(2), 115–118. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.2.2.03johCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, T., Vermeerbergen, M., Schembri, A., & Leeson, L. (2007). Real data are messy: Considering cross-linguistic analysis of constituent ordering in Australian Sign Language (Auslan), Vlaamse Gebarantaal (VGT), and Irish Sign Language (ISL). In Perniss, P., Pfau, R., & Steinbach, M. (Eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure (pp. 163–208). Berlin, Germant: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, G. (2015). Bird minds: Cognition and behaviour of Australian native birds. Clayton, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica, 32, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(70)90094-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. An analysis of an example. In Siegman, A. & Pope, B. (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 170–210). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1978). Differential perception and attentional frame in face-to-face interaction: Two problems for investigation. Semiotica, 24, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1978.24.3-4.305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In Key, M. R. (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–227). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (1984). Knowledge of sign language in an Australian Aboriginal Community. Journal of Anthropological Research, 40, 556–76. https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.40.4.3629797CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (1988). Sign languages of Aboriginal Australia: Cultural, semiotic and communicative perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1991). Some considerations for a theory of language origins. Man (N.S.), 26, 602–619. https://doi.org/10.2307/2803829Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1994) Do gestures communicate? A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2703_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (1995a). Andrea De Jorio – The first ethnographer of gesture? Visual Anthropology, 7, 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.1995.9966661CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (1995b). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-FCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2002). Some uses of the head shake. Gesture, 2(2), 147–182. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.03kenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2008). Some reflections on the relationship between “gesture” and “sign”. Gesture, 8, 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.3.05kenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2009). Manual actions, speech and the nature of language. In Gambarara, D. & Givigliano, A. (Eds.), Origine e sviluppo del linguaggio, fra teoria e storia (pp. 19–33). Rome, Italy: Aracne Editrice.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (2011). “Gesture first” or “speech first” in language origins? In Napoli, D. J. & Mathur, G. (Eds.), Deaf around the world (pp. 251–267). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (2012). Language and kinesic complexity. Reflections on “Dedicated gestures and the emergence of sign language” by W. Sandler. Gesture, 12(3), 308–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2014a) Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of “language”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 369(1651), Article 20139203. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0293CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kendon, A. (2014b). The poly-modalic nature of utterance and its relevance for inquiry into language origins. In Dor, D., Lewis, J., & Knight, C. (Eds.), The social origins of language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (pp. 67–76).Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (2016). Reflections on the “gesture first” hypothesis of language origins. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1117-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2017a). Pragmatic functions of gesture: Some observations on the history of their study and their nature. Gesture, 16(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.01kenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2017b). Language as semiotically heterogeneous systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002940CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2020). Sign language in Papua New Guinea. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. & Sigman, S. J. (1996). Ray L. Birdwhistell 1918–1994. Semiotica, 112(3/4), 231–261. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1996.112.3-4.231Google Scholar

Kendon, A. & Versante, L. (2003). Pointing by hand in “Neapolitan”. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 109–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kita, S., van Gijn, I., & van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures and their transcription by human coders. In Wachsmuth, I. & Frölich, M. (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human computer interaction. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 1371, pp. 23–35). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Laban, R. & Lawrence, F. C. (1947). Effort. London, UK: Macdonald and Evans.Google Scholar

Lascarides, A. & Stone, M. (2009). Discourse coherence and gesture interpretation. Gesture, 9, 147–180. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.9.2.01lasCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (1967). The social history of the Natural History of an Interview: A multidisciplinary investigation of social communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 20, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818709389274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lempert, M. (2011). Barak Obama, being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture, 11(3), 241–270. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.3.01lemCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lepic, R. & Occhino, C. (2018). A construction morphology approach to sign language analysis. In Booij, G. (Ed.), The construction of words (pp. 141–172). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International AG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mandel, M. (1977). Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In Friedman, L. A. (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language (pp. 57–107). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Meggitt, M. (1954). Sign language among the Walbiri of central Australia. Oceania, 25, 2–16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40328952CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meissner, M. & Philpott, S. B. (1975). The sign language of sawmill workers in British Columbia. Sign Language Studies, 9, 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1975.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, J. (2015). Whistled languages: A worldwide inquiry on human whistled speech. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, D., Peter, C., Marsh, P., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (1979). Gestures: Their origins and distribution. London, UK: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the palm-up-open-hand: A case of a gesture family? In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 233–256). Berlin, Germany: Weidler Buchverlag.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2014). Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., David, M., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1687–1702). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Neumann, R. (2004). The conventionalization of the ring gesture in German discourse. In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 216–224). Berlin, Germany: Weidler Buchverlag.Google Scholar

Poggi, I. (1983). La mano a borsa: analisi semantica di un gesto emblematico olofrastico. In Attili, G. & Ricci-Bitti, E. P. E. (Eds.), Communicare senza parole (pp. 219–238). Rome, Italy: Bulzoni.Google Scholar

Pulvermuller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1706CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Quintillian see Butler, H. E. (1922).Google Scholar

Rimé, B. & Schiaratura, L. (1991). Gesture and speech. In Feldman, R. S. & Rimè, B. (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 239–281). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Roth, W. E. (1897). Ethnological studies among the North-West-Central Queensland Aborigines. Brisbane, Australia: Edmund Gregory, Government Printer.Google Scholar

Scheflen, A. E. (1965). The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry: Journal of Interpersonal Relations, 27, 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1964.11023403CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schembri, A., Jones, C., & Burnham, D. (2005). Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language and nonsigners’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10, 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni029CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Seyfeddinipur, M. (2004). Meta-discursive gestures from Iran: Some uses of the “pistol hand”. In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 205–216). Berlin, Germany: Weidler Buchverlag.Google Scholar

Singleton, J., Goldin-Meadow, S., & McNeill, D. (1995). The cataclysmic break between gesticulation and sign: Evidence against a unified continuum of gestural communication. In Emmorey, K. & Reilly, J. (Eds.), Language, gesture and space (pp. 287–311). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar

Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf (=Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 8). Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar

Stokoe, W. C., Casterline, Dorothy C., & Croneberg, C. G. (1965). A dictionary of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2008). Depicting by gesture. Gesture, 8(3), 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (Eds.). (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar

Turner, J. (2014). Philology: The forgotten origins of the modern humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tylor, E. B. (1878). Researches into the early history of mankind and the development of civilization. Boston, MA: Estes & Lauriat.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Umiker-Sebeok, J. & Sebeok, T. A. (Eds.). (1987). Monastic sign languages. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vermeerbergen, M., Leeson, L., and Crasborn, O. (Eds.) (2007). Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, L. M., Jr. (1960). The sign language: An analysis. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar

Wundt, W. (1973). The language of gestures (J. S. Thayer, C. M. Greenleaf, & M. D. Silberman, Trans.). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 468–523. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alibali, M. W., Spencer, R. C., Knox, L., & Kita, S. (2011). Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1138–1144. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T., & Fujii, M. (2007). Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of manner and path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102(1), 16–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Andrén, M. (2010). Children’s Gestures from 18 to 30 Months. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) Lund University, Lund. Retrieved from https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/f3e27d0e-a023-475a-af6d-c23c3e9c19f1.Google Scholar

Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., Morgenstern, A., & Boutet, D. (2016). A child’s multimodal negations from 1 to 4: The interplay between modalities. In Larrivée, P. & Lee, C. (Eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives (pp. 95–123). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bird, S., & Liberman, M. (2001). A formal framework for linguistic annotation. Speech Communication 33(1/2), 23–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boersma, P., & van Heuven, V. (2001). Speak and unSpeak with PRAAT. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–347.Google Scholar

Bohle, U. (2013). Approaching notation, coding, and analysis from a conversational analysis point of view. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 992–1007). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Boutet, D. (2015). Conditions formelles d’une analyse de la négation gestuelle [Formal conditions of an analysis of gestural negation]. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University, 6(717), 116–129.Google Scholar

Bressem, J. (2013a). A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1079–1098). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J. (2013b). Transcription systems for gestures, speech, prosody, postures, gaze. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1037–1058). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., Ladewig, S. H., & Müller, C. (2013). Linguistic Annotation System for Gestures (LASG). In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1098–1125). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., Stein, N., & Wegener, C. (2017). Multimodal language use in Savosavo: Refusing, excluding and negating with speech and gesture. Pragmatics, 27(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.2.01breGoogle Scholar

Brugman, H., Wittenburg, P., Levinson, S. C., & Kita, S. (2002). Multimodal annotations in gesture and sign language studies. Paper presented at The 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Las Palmas, Gran Canaria.Google Scholar

Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2008). Spontaneous gestures during mental rotation tasks: Insights into the microdevelopment of the motor strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cienki, A. (2015). Spoken language usage events. Language and Cognition, 7(04), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cienki, A., & Iriskhanova, O. K. (Eds.). (2018). Aspectuality across languages: Event construal in speech and gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colletta, J.-M. (2009). Comparative analysis of children’s narratives at different ages: A multimodal approach. Gesture, 9(1), 61–96. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.9.1.03colCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colletta, J.-M., Kunene, R. N., Venouil, A., Kaufmann, V., & Simon, J.-P. (2008). Multi-track annotation of child language and gestures. Paper presented at the International LREC Workshop on Multimodal Corpora, Marrakesh, Morocco.Google Scholar

Condon, W. S., & Ogston, W. D. (1967). A segmentation of behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 5 (3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(67)90004-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Congdon, E. L., Novack, M. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2018). Gesture in experimental studies: How videotape technology can advance psychological theory. Organizational Research Methods, 21(2), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116654548CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Beugher, S., Brône, G., & Goedemé, T. (2018). A semi-automatic annotation tool for unobtrusive gesture analysis. Language Resources and Evaluation, 52(2), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-017-9404-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Ruiter, J. P. (2000). The production of gesture and speech. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 284–311). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Debras, C., & Cienki, A. (2012). Some uses of head tilts and shoulder shrugs during human interaction, and their relation to stancetaking. 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Conference on Social Computing, 932–937. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.136CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deppermann, A. (2018). Sprache in der multimodalen Interaktion. [Language in multimodal interaction.] In Deppermann, A. & Reineke, S. (Eds.), Sprache im kommunikativen, interaktiven und kulturellen Kontext [Language in the communicative, interactive, and cultural context] (pp. 51–85). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, S. (1996). Grammatical form and “thinking-for-speaking” in Mandarin Chinese and English: An analysis based on speech-accompanying gestures. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Duncan, S. (2003). Gesture in language: Issues for sign language research. In Emmorey, K. (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in signed languages (pp. 259–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Duncan, S. (2005). Gesture in signing: A case study in Taiwan Sign Language. Language and Linguistics, 6(2), 279–318.Google Scholar

Enfield, N., Kita, S., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2007). Primary and secondary pragmatic functions of pointing gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1722–1741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferré, G. (2011). Functions of three open-palm hand gestures. Multimodal Communication, 1(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2012-0002Google Scholar

Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S., & Wagner Cook, S. (2012). Gesture in thought. In Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 1–36). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grimminger, A., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2019). Multimodale Kommunikation in frühen Buchlesesituationen und ihr Zusammenhang mit dem späteren Wortschatz. [Multimodal communication in early book reading situations and its relationship with later vocabulary.] Sprache · Stimme · Gehör [Speech · Voice · Hearing], 43(02), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0851-9063Google Scholar

Gullberg, M. (2010). Methodological reflections on gesture analysis in second language acquisition and bilingualism research. Second Language Research, 26(1), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309337639CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gullberg, M. (2011). Thinking, speaking and gesturing about motion in more than one language. In Pavlenko, A. (Ed.), Thinking and speaking in two languages (pp. 143–169). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gullberg, M., De Bot, K., & Volterra, V. (2008). Gestures and some key issues in the study of language development. Gesture, 8(2), 149–179. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.2.03gulCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilliard, C., & Cook, S. W. (2017). A technique for continuous measurement of body movement from video. Behavior Research Methods, 49(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0685-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ide, N. (2017). Introduction: The handbook of linguistic annotation. In Ide, N. & Pustejovsky, J. (Eds.), Handbook of linguistic annotation (pp. 1–18). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarmołowicz, E., Karpiński, M., Malisz, Z., & Szczyszek, M. (2007). Gesture, prosody and lexicon in task-oriented dialogues: multimedia corpus recording and labelling. In Esposito, A., Faundez-Zanuy, M., Keller, E., & Marinaro, M. (Eds.), Verbal and nonverbal communication behaviours (pp. 99–110). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karpiński, M., Jarmołowicz-Nowikow, E., & Malisz, Z. (2008). Aspects of gestural and prosodic structure of multimodal utterances in Polish task-oriented dialogues. Speech and Language Technology, 11, 113–122.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. In Seigman, A. & Pope, B. (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177–216). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-FCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, H. H., Ha, Y. S., Bien, Z., & Park, K. H. (2012). Gesture encoding and reproduction for human‐robot interaction in text‐to‐gesture systems. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 39(6), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/01439911211268705CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kipp, M. (2001). Anvil: A generic annotation tool for multimodal dialogue. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech), 1367–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kipp, M., Neff, M., & Albrecht, I. (2007). An annotation scheme for conversational gestures: How to economically capture timing and form. Language Resources and Evaluation – Special Issue on Multimodal Corpora, 41, 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-007-9053-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kopp, S. (2017). Computational gesture research: Studying the functions of gesture in human-agent interaction. In Church, R. B., Alibali, M. W. & Kelly, S. D. (Eds.), Why gesture: How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating (pp. 267–284), Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kopp, S., & Wachsmuth, I. (2004). Synthesizing multimodal utterances for conversational agents. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 15(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koutalidis, S., Kern, F., Németh, A., Mertens, U., Abramov, O., Kopp, S., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2019). Multimodal marking of information structure in 4-year-old German children. Paper presented at the 2020 Gesture and Speech in Interaction, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar

Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesman, R. F. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 261–283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladewig, S. H. (2010). Beschreiben, suchen und auffordern: Varianten einer rekurrenten Geste [Describing, searching, and requesting: Variations of a recurrent gesture.] Sprache und Literatur [Language and Literature], 41(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1163/25890859-041-01-90000006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lausberg, H., & Sloetjes, H. (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES–ELAN system. Behavioral Research Methods, 41(3), 841–849. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.841CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lausberg, H., & Sloetjes, H. (2015). The revised NEUROGES–ELAN system: An objective and reliable interdisciplinary analysis tool for nonverbal behavior and gesture. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 973–993. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0622-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Madeo, R. C., Lima, C. A., & Peres, S. M. (2017). Studies in automated hand gesture analysis: an overview of functional types and gesture phases. Language Resources and Evaluation, 51(2), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-016-9373-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martell, C. (2005). FORM: An experiment in the annotation of the kinematics of gesture. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2018). Gestures as image schemas and force gestalts: A dynamic systems approach augmented with motion-capture data analyses. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(1), 20180002. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2018-0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mondada, L. (2014). Conventions for multimodal transcription. Retrieved from https://franz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/franz/user_upload/redaktion/Mondada_conv_multimodality.pdfGoogle Scholar

Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. A case of a gesture family? In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 233–256). Berlin, Germany: Weidler Verlag.Google Scholar

Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1025499CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oben, B., & Brône, G. (2015). What you see is what you do: On the relationship between gaze and gesture in multimodal alignment. Language and Cognition, 7(4), 546–562. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oloff, F. (2010). Ankommen und Hinzukommen. Zur Struktur der Ankunft von Gästen. [Arriving and joining. On the structure of guests’ arrival]. In Schmitt, R. (Ed.), Koordination. Analysen zur multimodalen Interaktion [Coordination: Analyses of multimodal interaction] (pp. 171–228). Tübingen, Germany: Narr.Google Scholar

Pouw, W., Trujillo, J. P., & Dixon, J. A. (2019). The quantification of gesture–speech synchrony: A tutorial and validation of multimodal data acquisition using device-based and video-based motion tracking. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01271-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ripperda, J., Drijvers, L., & Holler, J. (2020). Speeding up the detection of non-iconic and iconic gestures (SPUDNIG): A toolkit for the automatic detection of hand movements and gestures in video data. Behavior Research Methods, 52(4), 1783–1794. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01350-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ruth-Hirrel, L., & Wilcox, S. (2018). Speech-gesture constructions in cognitive grammar: The case of beats and points. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(3), 453–493. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, T. (2004). EXMARaLDA: Ein System zur computergestützten Diskurstranskription. [EXMARaLDA: A system for computer-aided discourse transcription.] In Mehler, A. & Lobin, H. (Eds.), Automatische Textanalyse. Systeme und Methoden zur Annotation und Analyse natürlichsprachlicher Texte [Automatic text analysis: Systems and methods for annotation and analysis of natural language texts] (pp. 203–218). Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Schmitt, R. (2005). Zur multimodalen Struktur von turn-taking [On the multimodal structure of turn-taking]. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion [Conversation Research: Online Journal of Verbal Interaction], 6, 17–61.Google Scholar

Seeling, T., Fricke, E., Lynn, U., Schöller, D., & Bullinger, A. C. (2016). Natürliche User Interfaces durch den Einbezug von Nutzern gestalten: Implikationen für ein Entwickler-Gestenmanual. [Designing natural user interfaces through user involvement: Implications for a gesture-developer manual] Paper presented at the Useware Conference, Dresden, Germany.Google Scholar

Seyfeddinipur, M. (2006). Disfluency: Interrupting speech and gesture. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar

Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Ren, A. (2018). The prosodic characteristics of non-referential co-speech gestures in a sample of academic-lecture-style speech. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. 1514. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01514CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spiro, I., Taylor, G., Williams, G., & Bregler, C. (2010). Hands by hand: Crowd-sourced motion tracking for gesture annotation. Paper presented at the 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition-Workshops, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar

Steen, F. F., Hougaard, A., Joo, J., Olza, I., Cánovas, C. P., Pleshakova, A., … Woźny, J. (2018). Toward an infrastructure for data-driven multimodal communication research. Linguistics Vanguard, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0041CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, J. (2017). Self-making man: A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stukenbrock, A. (2009). Herausforderungen der multimodalen Transkription: Methodische und theoretische Überlegungen aus der wissenschaftlichen Praxis. [Challenges in multimodal transcription: Methodological and theoretical considerations from scientific practice] In Birkner, K. & Stukenbrock, A. (Eds.), Die Arbeit mit Transkripten in Fortbildung, Lehre und Forschung [Working with transcripts in further training, teaching and research] (pp. 144–168). Mannheim, Germany: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar

Theofilis, K., Nehaniv, C., & Dautenhahn, K. (2014). Adaptive gesture extraction and imitation for human-robot interaction. Paper presented at the 2014 AAAI Fall Symposium Series, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar

Trujillo, J. P., Vaitonyte, J., Simanova, I., & Özyürek, A. (2019). Toward the markerless and automatic analysis of kinematic features: A toolkit for gesture and movement research. Behavior Research Methods, 51(2), 769–777. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1086-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Turchyn, S., Moreno, I. O., Cánovas, C. P., Steen, F. F., Turner, M., Valenzuela, J., & Ray, S. (2018). Gesture annotation with a visual search engine for multimodal communication research. Paper presented at the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. New Orleans, LA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wagner, S. M., Nusbaum, H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial? Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russal, A., Klassmann, A., & Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.Google Scholar

Zima, E. (2014). Gibt es multimodale Konstruktionen? Eine Studie zu [V (motion) in circles] und [all the way from X PREP Y]. [Are there multimodal constructions? A study on [V (motion) in circles] and [all the way from X PREP Y]] Gesprächsforschung – Online Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion [Conversation Research: Online Journal of Verbal Interaction], 15, 1–48.Google Scholar

Zima, E., & Bergs, A. (2017). Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20161006. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrén, M. (2010). Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=1700528&fileOId=1700711Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. F., Stokoe, W. C., & Wilcox, S. E. (1995). Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bartenieff, I., & Lewis, D. (1980). Body movement. Coping with the environment. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar

Bohle, U. (2007). Das Wort ergreifen – Das Wort übergeben. Explorative Studie zur Rolle redebegleitender Gesten in der Organisation des Sprecherwechsels [Taking the floor – handing over the floor. Exploratory study on the role of gestures accompanying speech in the organization of speaker turns]. Berlin, Germany: Weidler Verlag.Google Scholar

Boutet, D. (2001). Approche morpho-dynamique du sens dans la gestuelle conversationnelle [Morpho-dynamic approach to meaning in conversational gestures]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) Université de Paris VIII.Google Scholar

Boutet, D. (2010). Structuration physiologique de la gestuelle: Modèle et tests [Physiological structuring of gestures: Model and tests]. Lidil, 42, 77–96. https://doi.org/10.4000/lidil.3070CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A., & Cienki, A. (2016). Grammatical aspect and gesture in French: A kinesiological approach. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 20(3), 132–151. Retrieved from https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/14745/13784Google Scholar

Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A., & Cienki, A. (2018). Looking ahead: Kinesiological analysis. In Cienki, A. & Iriskhanova, O. K. (Eds.), Aspectuality across languages. Event construal in speech and gesture (pp. 143–160). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Bressem, J. (2013a). A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1079–1098). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J. (2013b). Transcription systems for gestures, speech, prosody, postures, and gaze. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S., (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1037–1059). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J. (2021). Repetitions in gesture: A cognitive-linguistic and usage-based perspective. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bressem, J., & Ladewig, S. H. (2011). Rethinking gesture phases: Articulatory features of gestural movement? Semiotica, 184(1/4), 53–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.022 Retrieved from www.janabressem.de/Downloads/Bressem-Ladewig%202011-gesture%20phases.pdfGoogle Scholar

Bressem, J., Ladewig, S. H., & Müller, C. (2013). Linguistic Annotation System for Gestures (LASG). In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1098–1124). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., Ladewig, S. H., & Müller, C. (2018). Ways of expressing action in multimodal narrations: The semiotic complexity of character viewpoint depictions. In Hübl, A. & Steinbach, M. (Eds.), Linguistic foundations of narration in spoken and sign languages (pp. 223–250). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014a). The family of Away gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1592–1604). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014b). A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1575–1591). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2017). The “Negative-Assessment-Construction”: A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture? Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0053CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bressem, J., Stein, N., & Wegener, C. (2017). Multimodal language use in Savosavo: Refusing, excluding and negating with speech and gesture. Pragmatics, 27(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.2.01breGoogle Scholar

Bressem, J. & Wegener, C. (2021). Handling talk: A cross-linguistic perspective on discursive functions of gestures in German and Savosavo, Gesture, 20(2), 219–253. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19041.breCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bühler, K. (1933). Ausdruckstheorie. Das System an der Geschichte aufgezeigt [Theory of expression: The system explained by its history]. Jena, Germany: Fischer.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, L. (2008). Metaphor and talk. In Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 197–211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor & Symbol, 24(2), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480902830821CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cienki, A. (2013). Cognitive linguistics. spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 182–201). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Cienki, A. (2017). Ten lectures on spoken language and gesture from the perspective of cognitive linguistics: Issues of dynamicity and multimodality. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cienki, A., & Iriskhanova, O. K. (Eds.). (2018). Aspectuality across languages: Event construal in speech and gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008a). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (2008b). Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 483–501). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (2014). Ways of viewing metaphor in gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. (Vol. 2, pp. 1766–1781). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Corballis, M. C. (2013). Gesture as precursor to speech in evolution. In Müller, C., Cienki., A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 466–480). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuffari, E., & Jensen, T. W. (2014). Living bodies: Co-enacting experience. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook of multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 2016–2025). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (Eds.). (2012). Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deleuze, G. (2008a). Cinema 1. The movement image. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (2008b). Cinema 2. The time image. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar

Duncan, S. D. (2002). Gesture, verb aspect, and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture, 2(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.04dunCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, S. D. (2006). Co-expressivity of speech and gesture: Manner of motion in Spanish, English, and Chinese. In Proceedings of the 27th Berkeley Linguistics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 353–370). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v27i1.3181Google Scholar

Efron, D. (1972). Gesture, race and culture. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. (Original work published 1941)Google Scholar

Eisenstein, S. M. (1998). The montage of film attractions. In Taylor, R. (Ed.), The Eisenstein reader (pp. 35–52). London, UK: British Film Institute. (Original work published 1924)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fillmore, C. J. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), 222–254.Google Scholar

Fricke, E. (2007). Origo, Geste und Raum. Lokaldeixis im Deutschen [Origo, gesture and space. Local deixis in German]. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fricke, E. (2014). Deixis, gesture, and embodiment from a linguistic point of view. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook of multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1803–1823). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Fuchs, T. (2017). Intercorporeality and interaffectivity. In Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gullberg, M. (1998). Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse: A study of learners of French and Swedish. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lund University, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar

Horst, D., Boll, F., Schmitt, C., & Müller, C. (2014). Gesture as interactive expressive movement: Inter-affectivity in face-to-face communication. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 2112–2125). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Jensen, T. W., & Greve, L. (2019). Ecological cognition and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(1), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2019.1591720CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kappelhoff, H. (2013). Ausdrucksbewegung und Zuschauerempfinden. Eisensteins Konzept des Bewegungsbildes [Expressive movement and audience perception. Eisenstein’s concept of the movement image]. In Curtis, R., Koch, G., & Siegel, M. (Eds.), Synchronisierung der Künste [Synchronization of the arts] (pp. 73–84). Munich, Germany: Fink.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kappelhoff, H. (2014). Artificial emotions: Melodramatic practices of shared interiority. In Campe, R. & Weber, J. (Eds.), Rethinking emotion: Interiority and exteriority in pre-modern and contemporary thought (pp. 264–288). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kappelhoff, H., & Müller, C. (2011). Embodied meaning construction: Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture, and feature film. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(2), 121–153. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.2.02kapCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In Ritchie Key, M. (Ed.), Nonverbal communication and language (pp. 207–227). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1981). Geography of gesture. Semiotica, 37(1/2), 129–163.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1992). The negotiation of context in face-to-face interaction. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 323–334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A. (2015). Gesture and sign: Utterance uses of visible bodily action. In Allen, K. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics (pp. 33–46). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kennedy, A. (2013). Laban based analysis and notation of body movement. In Müller, C., Cienki., A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 941–957). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Kita, S. (1997). Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics, 35, 379–415. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.379CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kita, S. (2003). Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kita, S., van Gijn, I., & van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In Wachsmuth, I. & Fröhlich, M. (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction (pp. 23–35). Berlin; Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch, S. C., Fuchs, T., Summa, M., & Müller, C. (2012). Body memory, metaphor and movement. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladewig, S. H. (2014). The cyclic gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1605–1618). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Ladewig, S. H. (2020). Integrating gestures: The dimension of multimodality in cognitive grammar. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993). Gesture and speech. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Original work published 1964)Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandel, M. (1977). Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In Friedman, L. A. (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language (pp. 57–107). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1945)Google Scholar

Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (Eds.). (2017). Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2007). Methodology for multimodality: One way of working with speech and gesture data. In Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S. & Spivey, M. J. (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 225–248) Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2014). Gestures and iconicity. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1712–1731). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2017). Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0047CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2019a). Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis. Semiotica, 228, 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0090CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2019b). Visuo-kinetic signs are inherently metonymic: How embodied metonymy motivates form, function and schematic patterns in gesture. Frontiers of Psychology, 10, article 254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mondada, L. (2013a). Conversation analysis: Talk and bodily resources for the organization of social interaction. In Müller, C., Cienki., A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 218–226). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Mondada, L. (2013b). Multimodal interaction. In Müller, C., Cienki., A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 577–588). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Morris, D., Collett, P., Marsh, P., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (1979). Gestures: Their origins and distribution. London, UK: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (1998a). Iconicity and gesture. In Santi, S. (Ed.), Oralité et gestualité: Communication multimodale, interaction [Orality and gestures: Multimodal communication, interaction] (pp. 321–328). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (1998b). Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte, Theorie, Sprachvergleich [Co-speech gestures: Cultural history, theory, cross-linguistic comparison]. Berlin, Germany: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family? In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 233–256). Berlin, Germany: Weidler.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2007). Gestures in human and nonhuman primates: Why we need a comparative view. In Liebal, K., Müller, C., & Pika, S. (Eds.), Gestural communication in human and nonhuman primates (pp. 233–256). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, C. (2009). Gesture and language. In Malmkjaer, K. (Ed.), Routledge’s linguistics encyclopedia (pp. 214–217). Abington, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2010). Mimesis und Gestik [Mimesis and gesture]. In Koch, G., Voss, C., & Vöhler, M. (Eds.), Die Mimesis und ihre Künste [Mimesis and its arts] (pp. 149–187). Munich, Germany: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2013). Gestures as a medium of expression: The linguistic potential of gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 202–217). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2014a). Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1687–1702). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2014b). Ring-gestures across cultures and times: Dimensions of variation. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1511–1522). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2015). Using gestures with speech: Variable cognitive-semantic and pragmatic relations. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University, 6(717), 452–466. Retrieved from www.vestnik-mslu.ru/Vest-2015/Vest15-717z.pdfGoogle Scholar

Müller, C. (2016). From mimesis to meaning: A systematics of gestural mimesis for concrete and abstract referential gestures. In Zlatev, J., Sonesson, G., & Konderak, P. (Eds.), Meaning, mind and communication: Explorations in cognitive semiotics (pp. 211–226). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2017a). How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture, 16(2), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mulCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, C. (2017b). Waking metaphors: Embodied cognition in discourse. In Hampe, B. (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition in discourse (pp. 297–316). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, C. (2019a). Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, article 1651. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2019b). Metaphorizing as embodied interactivity: What gesturing and film viewing can tell us about an ecological view on metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 34 (1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2019.1591723CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, C., Bressem, J., & Ladewig, S. H. (2013). Towards a grammar of gesture: A form-based view. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 707–733). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C., & Kappelhoff, H. (2018). Cinematic metaphor: Experience – affectivity – temporality. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, C., & Ladewig, S. H. (2013). Metaphors for sensorimotor experiences: Gestures as embodied and dynamic conceptualizations of balance in dance lessons. In Borkent, M., Dancygier, B., & Hinnell, J. (Eds.), Language and the creative mind (pp. 295–324). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Müller, C., Ladewig, S. H., & Bressem, J. (2013). Gestures and speech from a linguistic perspective: A new field and its history. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 55–81). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C., & Tag, S. (2010). The dynamics of metaphor: Foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 6, 85–120. https://doi.org/10.3726/81610_85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nùnez, R., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistics comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Özyürek, A., & Kita, S. (1999). Expressing manner and path in English and Turkish: Differences in speech, gesture, and conceptualization. In Hahn, M. & Stoness, S. C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty first annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 507–512). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2008). Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology, 44(4), 1040–1054. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Parrill, F., Bergen, B. K., & Lichtenstein, P. V. (2013). Grammatical aspect, gesture, and conceptualization: Using co-speech gesture to reveal event representations. Cognitive Linguistics, 24(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parrill, F., Lavanty, B., Bennett, A., Klco, A., & Demir-Lira, O. E. (2018). The relationship between character viewpoint gesture and narrative structure in children. Language and Cognition, 10(3), 408–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2018.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parrill, F., & Sweetser, E. (2004). What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture, 4(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.2.05parCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plessner, H. (1982). Die Deutung des mimischen Ausdrucks: Ein Beitrag zur Lehre vom Bewußtsein des anderen Ichs [The interpretation of facial expression: A contribution to the understanding of the consciousness of the other self] [in cooperation with Buytendijk, Frederik J. J.]. In Dux, G., Marquard, O., & Ströker, E. (Eds.), Helmuth Plessner. Gesammelte Schriften [Helmuth Plessner: Collected Writings] (Vol. 7: Ausdruck und menschliche Natur [Vol. 7. Expression and human nature], pp. 67–129). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp. (Original work published 1925)Google Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, R. (2005). Zur multimodalen Struktur von turn-taking [The multimodal structure of turn-taking]. Gesprächsforschung – Online Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion [Conversation Studies – Online Journal on Verbal Interaction], 6, 17–61.Google Scholar

Schoonjans, S. (2018). Modalpartikeln als multimodale Konstruktionen: Eine korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen [Modal particles as multimodal constructions: A corpus-based analysis of the co-occurrence of modal particles and gestures in German]. Berlin, Germany: DeGruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sherzer, J. (1973). Verbal and nonverbal deixis: The pointed lip gesture among the San Blas Cuna. Language in Society, 2(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500000087CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought to language” to “thinking and speaking”. In Levinson, S. C. & Gumperz, J. J. (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stec, K., & Sweetser, E. (2016). Maintaining multiple viewpoints with gaze. In Dancygier, B., Wei-Iun, L., & Verhagen, A. (Eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities (pp. 237–257). Berlin, Gemany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Stokoe, W. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers, No. 8. Buffalo, NY: Department of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Buffalo. Republished (2005) in The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, J. (2017). Self-making man: A day of action, life and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, J., & Hartge, U. (1992). Previews: Gestures at the transition place. In Auer, P. & di Luzio, A. (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 135–158). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 480–519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Taub, S. F. (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teßendorf, S. (2013). Pragmatic and metaphoric: Combining functional with cognitive approaches in the analysis of the “brushing aside gesture”. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1540–1557). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Wilcox, S. (2009). Symbol and symptom: Routes from gesture to signed language. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.04wilCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilcox, S., & Occhino, C. (2016). Constructing signs: Place as a symbolic structure in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(3), 371–404. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilcox, S., Shaffer, B., Jarque, M. J., Segimon, J. M., Pizzuto, E., & Rossini, P. (2000). The emergence of grammar from gesture: A cross-linguistic study of modal verbs in three signed languages. Paper presented at the Seventh Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar

Wundt, W. (1973). The language of gestures. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zlatev, J. (2014a). Human uniqueness, bodily mimesis and the evolution of language. Humana Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 27, 197–219.Google Scholar

Zlatev, J. (2014b). Image schemas, mimetic schemas and children’s gestures. Cognitive Semiotics, 7(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2014-0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie [Theory of language]. Jena, Germany: Fischer.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (1973). Recherche pour une formation auditive et inductive de professeurs de langues vivantes à une méthode de correction phonétique de type perceptif [Research for the auditory and inductive training for modern language teachers in a perceptual method of phonetic correction]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) Paris, France, Université de Paris III.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (1979). L’index signifiant [The signifying index finger], Etudes de Linguistique Appliquée, 35, 91–109.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (1980). Etude des expressions mimiques conventionnelles françaises dans le cadre d’une communication non verbale [Study of conventional French facial expressions in the context of nonverbal communication]. Semiotica, 29(3/4), 245–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (1981). Etude des expressions mimiques conventionnelles françaises dans le cadre d’une communication non verbale testées sur des Hongrois [Study of conventional French facial expressions in the context of nonverbal communication using Hungarian test subjects]. Semiotica, 35(1/2), 125–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (1984). Contribution à une analyse sémiologique de la mimique faciale et gestuelle française dans ces rapports avec la communication verbale (1. Experimentation; 2. Taxonomie; 3. Synthèse; 4. Annexe illustrative) [Contribution to a semiological analysis of French facial and gestural expression in their relation to verbal communication (1. Experimentation; 2. Taxonomy; 3. Synthesis; 4. Appendix of illustrations)]. Lille: Université de Lille III. (1983: Habilitation thesis, Université de Paris III).Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (1985a). La mimique faciale et gestuelle française du refus: motivation [The French facial and gestural expression of refusal: Motivation]. Geste et Image, 4, 11–37.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (1985b). Espace-Temps: Expression gestuelle du temps [Space-Time: Gestural expression of time]. Semiotica, 55(1/2), 43–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (1987). Geste et motivation [Gesture and motivation]. Semiotica, 65(1/2), 57–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (1989). Parallélisme phono-gestuel [Phono-gestural parallelism]. In Graines de parole. Puissance du verbe et traditions orales. Textes offerts à Geneviève Calame-Griaule, réunis par l’équipe du CNRS “Langage et Culture en Afrique de l’Ouest” [Seeds of speech. Power of the word and oral traditions. Texts offered to Geneviève Calame-Griaule, compiled by the CNRS team “Language and Culture in West Africa’]”, pp. 403–417. Paris, France: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (1994). Gestures. In Asher, R. E. & Simpson, J. M. Y. (Eds.) The encyclopedia of language & linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 1431–1434). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, and (1998) in Mey, J. L. (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics (pp. 326–330). Oxford, UK: Elsevier, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (1997). Multicanalité de la communication et multifonctionnalité du geste [The multichannel character of communication and multifunctionality of gesture]. In Polyphonie pour Iván Fónagy, pp. 61–71. Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (1998). Geste et images [Gesture and images], Semiotica, 118(1/2), 105–120. Retrieved from www.degruyter.com/view/journals/semi/118/1-2/article-p105.xml?language=enCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (2000). Les gestes qui parlent: Sémiologie du geste dans l’expression orale [The gestures that speak: Semiology of gesture in oral expression]. Directed by Pierre Samson, produced by ENS Fontenay/St Cloud. Série Mots et politique n°5. Recorded and published online, January 1, 2000. www.canal-u.tv/intervenants/calbris-genevieve–028605403Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2001). Principes méthodologiques pour une analyse du geste accompagnant la parole [Methodological principles for analyzing co-speech gesture]. Mots, 67, 129–148. Retrieved from www.persee.fr/doc/mots_0243-6450_2001_num_67_1_2509CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (2002a). L’espace symbolique révélé par la gestuelle coverbale d’un homme politique [The symbolic space revealed by the coverbal gestures of a politician]. Mots, 68, 45–58. Retrieved from http://mots.revues.org/index6563.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (2002b). Sémantisme des connecteurs: nuancement du verbal par le gestuel [The semantism of connectors: the nuancing of the verbal by the gestural]. LIDIL, 26, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (2003a). From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis: Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions. Gesture, 3(1), 19–46. Retrieved from https://benjamins.com/catalog/gest.3.1.03calCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (2003b). Multireferentiality of coverbal gestures. In Rector, M., Poggi, I., & Trigo, N. (Eds.), Gestures: Meaning and use (pp. 203–207). Porto, Portugal: Universidad Fernando Pessoa.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2003c). L’expression gestuelle de la pensée d’un homme politique [The gestural expression of a politician’s intellect]. Paris, France: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2004). Déixis représentative [Representational deixis]. In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures, Proceedings of the Berlin conference, April 1998 (pp. 146–156). Berlin, Germany: Weidler.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2008a). Le geste coverbal, un signe analogique [Coverbal gesture, an analogical sign]. In D. Boutet & C. Cuxac (Eds.), Le signifiant gestuel: langues des signes et gestualité co-verbale, Cahiers de Linguistique Analogique, 5, 35–80.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2008b). La tête de Nicolas Sarkozy ou les fonctions des gestes de la tête durant l’énonciation [Nicolas Sarkozy’s head or the functions of head gestures during utterance]. Mots. Les langages du politique, 86, 99–118. Retrieved from https://journals.openedition.org/mots/14002Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G., & Montredon, J. (1975) ariefle: Approche Rythmique Intonative et Expressive du Français Langue Etrangère [A rhythmic, intonational, and expressive approach to French as a foreign language] (1 booklet, 1 magnetic tape, and 24 slides). Paris, France: CLE.Google Scholar

Calbris, G., & Montredon, J. (1980). Oh là là! Expression intonative et mimique [Oh my! Intonational and facial expression] (drawings by Lapointe C.) (teacher’s book, student’s book, 2 magnetic tapes, and 2 slide films). Paris, France: CLE International.Google Scholar

Calbris, G., & Montredon, J. (1986). Des gestes et des mots pour le dire [Gestures and words to say it] (drawings by Zaü). Paris, France: CLE International.Google Scholar

Calbris, G., & Montredon, J. (1992). La mauvaise langue: Du geste à l’expression imagée, au jeu de mots et au théâtre [Bad-mouthing: From gesture to metaphoric expression, wordplay and theatre] (Video production by Didi R.). Besançon, France: Media de l’U. de Franche Comté.Google Scholar

Calbris, G., & Montredon, J. (2011). Clés pour l’oral: Gestes et paroles dans l’argumentation conversationnelle [Keys to speaking: Gestures and words in conversational argumentation] (teaching kit, DVD, student’s manual, teacher’s booklet). Paris, France: Hachette.Google Scholar

Condon, W. S. (1976). An analysis of behavioral organization. Sign Language Studies, 13, 285–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Chanay, H. (2005). Review of L’expression gestuelle de la pensée d’un homme politique [The gestural expression of a politician’s thoughts] by G. Calbris (2003c). Marges Linguistiques, 9, 28–34. Retrieved from www.revue-texto.net/Parutions/Marges/00_ml092005.pdfGoogle Scholar

Fónagy, I. (1961). Le signe conventionnel motivé [The motivated conventional sign]. La linguistique, 7, 55–84.Google Scholar

Fónagy, I. (1983). La vive voix: Essais de psycho-phonétique [The living voice: Essays on psychophonetics]. Paris, France: Payot.Google Scholar

Fónagy, I. (2001). Languages within language. An evolutive approach. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fónagy, I., & Bérard, E. (1972). “Il est huit heures”: contribution à l’analyse sémantique de la vive voix [“It’s eight o’clock”: A contribution to the semantic analysis of the living voice], Phonetica, 26, 157–192. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2011). The social nature of embodied cognition: A view from the world of metaphor. Intellectica. Revue de l’Association pour la Recherche Cognitive, 56(2011/2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.3406/intel.2011.1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. (Ed.), Style and language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, M. (2015). Embodied understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(875), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00875CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jousse, M. (1936). Le mimisme humain et l’anthropologie du langage [Human mimicry and the anthropology of language]. Revue Anthropologique, 46(7–9), 201–215.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D., Quek, F., McCullough, K-E., Duncan, S., Furuyama, N., Bryll, R., … Ansari, R. (2001). Catchments, prosody and discourse. Gesture, 1(1), 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scherer, K. (1980). The functions of nonverbal signs in conversation. In St. Clair, R. N. & Gilles, H. (Eds.), The social and psychological contexts of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Slama-Cazacu, T. (1977). Le concept de “syntaxe mixte”, recherches autour d’une hypothèse [The concept of “mixed syntax”, research studies based on a hypothesis], Études de Linguistique Appliquée (ELA), 27, 114–123.Google Scholar

Bressem, J. (2013). A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1079–1098). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014a). The family of Away gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1592–1604). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014b). A repertoire of recurrent gestures of German. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1575–1591). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cienki, A. (2013). Cognitive linguistics: Spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 182–201). Berlin, the Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. (2003). Pointing and place. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 243–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Fedorova, O. V. (2018). O russkoj zhestikuljacii s lingvisticheskoj tochki zrenija (k vykhodu monografii E. A. Grishinoj) [Russian gestures from a linguistic perspective (dedicated to the publication of Elena A. Grishina’s monograph)]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija [Issues in Linguistics], 5, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0373658X0001400-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Grishina, E. A. (2017). Russkaja zhestikuljacija s lingvisticheskoj tochki zrenija: Korpusnye issledovania [Russian gesticulation from a linguistic point of view: Corpus studies]. Moscow, Russia: Languages of Slavic Culture.Google Scholar

Gullberg, M. (2011). Thinking, speaking and gesturing about motion in more than one language. In Pavlenko, A. (Ed.), Thinking and speaking in two languages (pp. 143–169). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassemer, J., & McCleary, L. (2018). The multidimensionality of pointing. Gesture, 17(3), 417–463. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.17018.hasCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iosad, P., Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., Piperski, A., & Sitchinava, D. (2018). Depth, brilliance, clarity: Andrey Anatolyevich Zaliznyak (1935–2017). Linguistic Typology, 22(1), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2018-0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemmerer, D., Chandrasekaran, B., & Tranel, D. (2007). A case of impaired verbalization but preserved gesticulation of motion events. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(1), 70–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290600926667CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A., & Versante, L. (2003). Pointing by hand in “Neapolitan”. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 109–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. 2003. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loehr, D. (2007). Aspects of rhythm in gesture and speech. Gesture, 7(2), 179–214. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.7.2.04loeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNeill, D., Cassell, J., & Levy, E. T. (1993). Abstract deixis. Semiotica, 95(1/2), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1993.95.1-2.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNeill, D., & Levy, E. T. (1993). Cohesion and gesture. Discourse Processes, 16, 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539309544845CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittelberg, I. (2010). Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In Evans, V. & Chilton, P. (Eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 351–385). London, UK: Equinox.Google Scholar