Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:33:52.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Recurrent Gestures: Cultural, Individual, and Linguistic Dimensions of Meaning-Making

from Part I - Gestural Types: Forms and Functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2024

By
Silva H. Ladewig
Edited by
Alan Cienki
Alan Cienki
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Recurrent gestures are stabilized forms that embody a practical knowledge of dealing with different communicative, interactional, cognitive, and affective tasks. They are often derived from practical actions and engage in semantic and pragmatic meaning-making. They occupy a place between spontaneous (singular) gestures and emblems on a continuum of increasing stabilization. The chapter reconstructs the beginnings of research on recurrent gestures and illuminates different disciplinary perspectives that have explored processes of their emergence and stabilization, as well as facets of their communicative potential. The early days of recurrent-gesture research focused on the identification of single specimens and on the refinement of descriptive methods. In recent years, their role in self-individuation, their social role, and their relationship to signs of sign language have become a focus of interest. The chapter explores the individual, the linguistic, and the cultural side of recurrent gestures. Recurrent gestures are introduced as sedimented individual and social practices, as revealing the linguistic potential of gestures, and as a type that forms culturally shared repertoires.

Keywords

recurrent gesturesconventionalizationstabilizationsign languagepragmatic gesturesgestures as social practicesgesture continuumgesture sign interfacegesture repertoires
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies , pp. 32 - 55
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrén, M. (2010). Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Retrieved from www.salc-sssk.org/pages/andren.mats/refs/andren2010-thesis.pdfGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. F. (2002). Original signs: Gesture, sign, and the sources of language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. (Original work published 1999.)Google Scholar
Barakat, R. A. (1969). Gesture systems. Keystone Folklore Quarterly, 14, 105–121.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Coates, L., & Roe, L. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 394–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15, 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A., & Cienki, A. (2016). Grammatical aspect and gesture in French: A kinesiological approach. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 20(3), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-14745Google Scholar
Bressem, J. (2014). Repetitions in gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1641–1649). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bressem, J. (2021). Repetitions in gesture: A cognitive-linguistic and usage-based perspective. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110697902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014a). The family of AWAY gestures. Negation, refusal and negative assessment. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1592–1605). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.1592Google Scholar
Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014b). A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1575–1592). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2017). The “Negative-Assessment-Construction” – A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture? Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1). 20160053. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressem, J., & Wegener, C. (2021). Handling talk: A cross-linguistic perspective on discursive functions of gestures in German and Savosavo. Gesture, 20(2), 219–253. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19041.breCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, H. (2001). O clever “He’s streetwise”: When gestures become quotable. Gesture, 1(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.2.05broCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, H., & Le Guen, O. (2019). Gesture studies and anthropological perspectives: An introduction. Gesture, 18(2–3), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.00040.broCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (2003). From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis: Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions. Gesture, 3(1), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.3.1.03calCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (2008). From left to right … : Coverbal gestures and their symbolic use of space. In Cienki, A. & Müller, C. (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 27–53). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (2017). Utterance construction grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20160048. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Iriskhanova, O. K. (Eds.). (2018). Aspectuality across languages: Event construal in speech and gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlin, F., Hagstrom, P., & Neidle, C. (2003). A particle of indefiniteness in American Sign Language. Linguistic Discovery, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.62Google Scholar
Cooperrider, K. (2019). Universals and diversity in gesture: Research past, present, and future. Gesture, 18(2–3), 209–238. https://doi:10.1075/gest.19011.cooCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooperrider, K., Abner, N., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2018). The Palm-Up Puzzle: Meanings and origins of a widespread form in gesture and sign. Frontiers in Communication, 3, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Paolo, E., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic bodies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S. D. (2002). Gesture, verb aspect, and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture, 2(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.04dunCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, D. (1972). Gesture, race and culture. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton. (Original work published 1941.)Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (2002). Gestures in signing: The presentation gesture in Danish Sign Language. In Schulmeister, R. & Reinitzer, H. (Eds.), Progress in sign language research: In honor of Siegmund Prillwitz / Festschrift für Siegmund Prillwitz (pp. 143–162). Hamburg, Germany: Signum.Google Scholar
Fenlon, J., Cooperrider, K., Keane, J., Brentari, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2019). Comparing sign language and gesture: Insights from pointing. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, E. (2010). Phonaestheme, Kinaestheme und multimodale Grammatik: Wie Artikulationen zu Typen werden, die bedeuten können [Phonaesthemes, kinaesthemes, and multimodal grammar: How articulations become types that can mean]. Sprache und Literatur [Language and Literature,], 41(105), 70–88.Google Scholar
Fricke, E., Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014). Gesture families and gesture fields. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1630–1640). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Centre.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (2018). The impulse to gesture: Where language, minds, and bodies intersect. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S., & Ladewig, S. H. (2021). Recurrent gestures throughout bodies, languages, and cultural practices. Gesture, 20(2), 153–79. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.21003.harCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, A. (1984). Everyday life. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. (Trans. D. Carr.) Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1936)Google Scholar
Janzen, T., & Shaffer, B. (2002). Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. In Meier, R. P., Cormier, K., & Quinto-Pozos, D. (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 199–223). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, T. (2012). Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In Pfau, R., Steinbach, M., & Woll, B. (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 816–840). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorio, A. de (2000). Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity. A translation of La mimica degli antichi investigata nel gestire napoletano (Fibreno, Naples 1832) and with an introduction and notes by Adam Kendon. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1980). A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Engaprovince of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion: Part I. Semiotica, 31(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1980.31.1-2.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1981). Geography of gesture. Semiotica, 37(1/2), 129–163.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1988). How gestures can become like words. In Poyatos, F. (Ed.), Crosscultural perspectives in nonverbal communication (pp. 131–141). Toronto, Canada: C. J. Hogrefe, Publishers.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1996). An agenda for gesture studies. The Semiotic Review of Books, 7(3), 7–12.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, E. S., & Beluggi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ladewig, S. H. (2010). Beschreiben, suchen und auffordern – Varianten einer rekurrenten Geste [Describing, searching and prompting – variants of a recurrent gesture]. Sprache und Literatur [Language and Literature], 41(1), 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, S. H. (2011). Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 6. https://doi:10.4000/cognitextes.406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, S. H. (2014a). The cyclic gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1605–1618). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ladewig, S. H. (2014b). Recurrent gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1558–1575). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ladewig, S. H. (2020). Integrating gestures. The dimension of multimodality in cognitive grammar. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanwer, J. P. (2017). Apposition: A multimodal construction? The multimodality of linguistic constructions in the light of usage-based theory. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20160071. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning : Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, M. (2011). Barack Obama, being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture, 11(3), 241–270. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.3.01lemCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, M. (2017). Uncommon resemblance: Pragmatic affinity in political gesture. Gesture, 16(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.1.02lemCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luginbühl, M., & Schneider, J. G. (2020). Medial shaping from the outset: On the mediality of the second presidential debate, 2016. Journal für Medienlinguistik [Journal for Media Linguistics], 3(1), 57–93. https://doi.org/10.21248/jfml.2020.34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (2013). The co-evolution of gesture and speech, and downstream consequences. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Cienki, A., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 480–512). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
McNeill, D., & Sowa, C. (2011). Birth of a morph. In Stam, G. & Ishino, M. (Eds.), Integrating gestures. The interdisciplinary nature of gesture (pp. 27–48). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The structure of behavior. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2017). Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20160047. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosher, J. A. (1916). The essentials of effective gesture for students of public speaking. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. A case of a gesture family? In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 234–256). Berlin, Germany: Weidler.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2010). Wie Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive [How gestures mean. A cognitive-linguistic and sequence-analytic perspective]. Sprache und Literatur [Language and Literature], 41(105), 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2013). Gestures as a medium of expression: The linguistic potential of gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 202–217). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2014). Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, 1687–1702). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2017). How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture, 16(2), 278–306. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mulCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2018). Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1651. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, C., Bressem, J., & Ladewig, S. H. (2013). Towards a grammar of gesture: A form-based view. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Tessendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 707–733). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Neville, H. (1904). Gesture. In Blackman, R. D. (Ed.), Voice, speech and gesture: A practical handbook to the elocutionary art (pp. 103–169). Edinburgh, UK: Grant.Google Scholar
Ott, E. A. (1902). How to gesture. New York, NY: Hinds & Noble.Google Scholar
Payrató, L., & Teßendorf, S. (2014). Pragmatic gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1531–1539). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Pfau, R., & Steinbach, M. (2006). Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign language. Linguistics in Potsdam 24(3), 3–98.Google Scholar
Quintilian, M. F. (1969). The “Institutio Oratoria” of Quintilian with an English translation by H. E. Butler. The Loeb Classical Library. New York, NY: G. P. Putnam and Sons.Google Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2003). Grundelemente einer Theorie sozialer Praktiken/Basic Elements of a Theory of Social. Zeitschrift für Soziologie [Journal for Sociology], 32(4), 282–301. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2003-0401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, J. (2005). Two concepts of practices. In Schatzki, T. R., Cetina, K. K., & von Savigny., E. (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 198–208). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ruth-Hirrel, L. (2018). A construction-based approach to cyclic gesture functions in English and Farsi [Doctoral dissertation]. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA. Retrieved from https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etdsGoogle Scholar
Ruth-Hirrel, L., & Wilcox, S. (2018). Speech-gesture constructions in cognitive grammar: The case of beats and points. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(3), 453–493. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R., Cetina, K. K., & Von Savigny, E. (2005). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scheflen, A. E. (1973). How behavior means. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Schoonjans, S. (2017). Multimodal construction grammar issues are construction grammar issues. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20160050. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, E. (2010). Habitualisierung und Sedimentierung. Zur Phänomenologie der Person [Habitualization and sedimentation. On the phenomenology of the person]. Filozofický časopis [Philosophical Magazine], Sonderband [Special Edition], 69–88.Google Scholar
Shaffer, B. (2000). A syntactic, pragmatic analysis of the expression of necessity and possibility in American Sign Language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA.Google Scholar
Shaffer, B., & Janzen, T. (2000). Gesture, lexical words, and grammar: Grammaticalization processes in ASL. In Conathan, J. L., Good, J., Kavitskaya, D., Wulf, A. B., & Yu, A. C. L. (Eds.) Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 26 (pp. 235–245). Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Sherzer, J. (1991). The Brazilian thumbs-up gesture. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 1(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1991.1.2.189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparhawk, C. (1978). Contrastive-identificational features of Persian gesture. Semiotica, 24(1/2), 49–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1978.24.1-2.49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J. (2008). Gesture in political communication: A case study of the Democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 154–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J. (2013). Praxeology of gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 674–685). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Streeck, J. (2016). Gestische Praxis und sprachliche Form [Gestural practice and linguistic form]. In Deppermann, A., Feilke, H., & Linke, A. (Eds.), Sprachliche und kommunikative Praktiken [Linguistic and communicative practices] (pp. 57–80). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Streeck, J. (2017). Self-making man: A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teßendorf, S. (2014). Pragmatic and metaphoric gestures– combining functional with cognitive approaches. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1540–1558). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
van Loon, E., Pfau, R., & Steinbach, M. (2014). The grammaticalization of gestures in sign languages. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 2133–2149). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehling, E. (2017). Discourse management gestures. Gesture, 16(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.04wehCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S. (2004). Gesture and language. Cross-linguistic and historical data from signed languages. Gesture, 4(1), 43–73. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.1.04wilCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S. (2005). Routes from gesture to language. Revista da ABRALIN – Associação Brasileira de Lingüística [ABRALIN Magazine – Brazilian Linguistics Association], 4 (1–2), 11–45.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S., Rossini, P., & Pizzuto, E. A. (2010). Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Brentari, D. (Ed.), Sign Languages (pp. 332–354). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woelert, P. (2011). Der Leib als Umschlagstelle von Raum und symbolischem Denken [The body as a transition point of space and symbolic thought]. In Alpsancar, S., Gehring, P., & Rölli, M. (Eds.), Raumprobleme [Space problems] (pp. 39–52). München, Germany: Wilhelm Fink.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wundt, W. (1901). Völkerpyschologie: Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. Die Sprache [Peoples’ psychology: An investigation of the developmental laws of language, myth, and custom. Language]. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Zima, E. (2017). On the multimodality of [all the way from X PREP Y]. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20160055. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zima, E., & Bergs, A. (2017). Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20161006. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0055CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×