Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:54:32.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Indefinites

from Part II - Theory of reference and quantification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

Adrian Brasoveanu
Affiliation:
University of California at Santa Cruz
Donka F. Farkas
Affiliation:
University of California at Santa Cruz
Maria Aloni
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Paul Dekker
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Work on the semantics and pragmatics of indefinite nominals has grown in the last thirty years to form a subfield of its own within the already focused field of nominal semantics. In this area of study, clearly circumscribing the domain of inquiry amounts to giving a theory of its object. Defining indefinites, therefore, cannot be a first step in a chapter like the present one, whose aim is to provide an overview of some of the solutions developed to the semantic and pragmatic problems they raise. Instead of attempting a definition of indefinites, then, we begin with a quick empirical tour of the type of nominals that are uncontroversially or arguably indefinite, after which we outline the issues the rest of the chapter focuses on.

As a first step, we can divide determiner phrases (DPs) into definite and indefinite based on whether they are headed by a definite or an indefinite D(eterminer). In English then, the expressions in (1) count as indefinite while those in (2) count as definite.

  1. (1) Mary visited a garden, some garden(s), some of the gardens, a certain garden.

  2. (2) Maurice visited the / this garden, these gardens / the capital of Albania / the largest museum in the world.

Within formal semantics, rooted in Aristotelian logic, the italicized DPs in these examples share the interpretive property of being existential, a property that distinguishes them from universal DPs such as every garden or each garden. Definite existentials are distinguished from their indefinite sisters in that their referent is supposed to be uniquely identified somehow, either because it is familiar or unique in context, or because it is inherently unique.

Classifying further types of nominals as definite or indefinite is intimately connected with analytic choices. Staying again with English, the italicized nominals below are uncontroversially accepted among the indefinite group even though this is a definite D and the plural in (4) is bare.

  1. (3) We visited this splendid garden in Suzhou that was offered to a Chinese scholar by his disciples.

  2. (4) Muriel visited gardens when she traveled to France this summer.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Indefinites
  • Edited by Maria Aloni, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Paul Dekker, Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics
  • Online publication: 05 July 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236157.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Indefinites
  • Edited by Maria Aloni, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Paul Dekker, Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics
  • Online publication: 05 July 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236157.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Indefinites
  • Edited by Maria Aloni, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Paul Dekker, Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics
  • Online publication: 05 July 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236157.009
Available formats
×