Alison, L., Power, N., Heuvel, C., Humann, M., Palasinksi, M., & Crego, J. (2015). Decision inertia: Deciding between least worst outcomes in emergency responses to disasters. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(2), 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A., (2007). Motivational bias in criminal investigators’ judgments of witness reliability. Applied Social Psychology, 37, 561–591.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. (1992). Videotaping of police interviews with suspects – An evaluation (Police Research Series Paper No. 1). Home Office.Google Scholar

Boon, R., Milne, R., Rosloot, E., & Heinsbroek, J. (2020). Demonstrating detail in investigative interviews: An examination of the DeMo technique. Applied Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3700Google Scholar

Bull, R., & Milne, R. (2004). Attempts to improve the police interviewing of Suspects. In Lassiter, D. (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 181–196). Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burrows, K., Powell, M., & Benson, M. (2015). A guide to clarifying evidence in Australian child forensic interviews. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 18, 91–103.Google Scholar

Christianson, S. A. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284–309.Google Scholar

Clarke, C., & Milne, R. (2001). National Evaluation of the PEACE Investigative Interviewing Course (Police Research Award Scheme No. PRAS/149). Home Office.Google Scholar

Clarke, C., & Milne, R. (2016). Interviewing suspects in England and Wales: A National Evaluation of PEACE interviewing: One decade later. In Walsh, D., Oxburgh, G., Redlich, A., & Mykleburst, T. (Eds.), International developments and practices in investigative interviewing and interrogation: Vol. 2. Suspects (pp. 101–108). Routledge.Google Scholar

Cohen-Hatton, S. R., Butler, P. C., & Honey, R. C. (2015). An investigation of operational decision making in situ. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57(5), 793–804.Google Scholar

Dalton, G., & Milne, R. (2020). Interviewing witnesses and victims of crime. In Marques, P. & Paulino, M. (Eds.), Police psychology: New trends in forensic psychological science. Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, G., Milne, R., Hope, L., Vernham, Z., & Nunan, J. (2021). “He was just your typical average guy”: Examining how person descriptions are elicited by frontline police officers. Applied Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3778Google Scholar

Donovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: now you see it, now you don’t. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 795.Google Scholar

Fahsing, I., & Ask, K. (2015). The making of an expert detective: The role of experience in English and Norwegian police officers’ investigative decision-making. Psychology, Crime and Law, 22, 203–223.Google Scholar

Fiedler, K. (2019). A missed opportunity to improve on credibility analysis in criminal law. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), My biggest research mistake (pp. 201–203). Sage.Google Scholar

Fisher, R., & Geiselman, R. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Thomas.Google Scholar

Frenda, S. J., Nichols, R. M., & Loftus, E. F. (2011). Current issues and advances in misinformation research. Current directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 20–23.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A., & Milne, R. (2005). Will it all end in tiers: Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In Williamson, T. (Ed.), Investigative interviewing Rights, research, regulation (pp. 167–189). Willan.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A., & Milne, R. (2018, Eds.). The psychology of criminal investigation; From theory to practice. Routledge.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A., Milne, B., & Cherryman, J. (2011). Question of control? The formulation of suspect and witness interview question strategies by advanced interviewers. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 13, 255.Google Scholar

Grubin, D. (2008). The case for polygraph testing of sex offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(2), 177–189.Google Scholar

Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. Wiley.Google Scholar

Heaton-Armstrong, A., & Wolchover, D. (1999). The recording of witness statements. In Heaton-Armstrong, A., Shepherd, E., & Wolchover, D. (Eds.), Analysing witness testimony. Blackstone Press.Google Scholar

Holmberg, U., & Christianson, S.-A. (2002). Murders’ and sex offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 20, 31–45.Google Scholar

Jores, T., Colloff, M., Kloft, L., Smailes, H., & Flowe, H. (2019). A meta-analysis of acute alcohol intoxication on witness recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 324–343.Google Scholar

Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers’ perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138(3), 323–330.Google Scholar

Kebbell, M. R., & Wagstaff, G. F. (1999). Face value? Factors that influence eyewitness accuracy. Home Office.Google Scholar

Kebbell, M. R., Wagstaff, G. F., & Covey, J. A. (1996). The influence of item difficulty on the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 653–662.Google Scholar

Kontogianni, F., Hope, L., Taylor, P. J., Vrij, A., & Gabbert, F. (2018). The benefits of a self-generated cue mnemonic for timeline interviewing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7, 454–461.Google Scholar

Lindsay, R. C. L., Wells, G. L., & Rumpel, C. (1981). Can people detect eyewitness identification accuracy within and across situations? Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 79–89.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560–572.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (1979). The malleability of human memory: Information introduced after we view an incident can transform memory. American Scientist, 67(3), 312–320.Google Scholar

Luus, E. C. A., & Wells, G. L. (1994). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: co-witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 714–723.Google Scholar

MacDonald, S., Snook, B., & Milne, R. (2017). Witness interview training: A field evaluation. Journal of Police and Criminological Psychology, 32, 77–84.Google Scholar

McLean, M. (1995). Quality investigation? Police interviewing of witnesses. Medicine, Science and the Law, 35, 116–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Wiley.Google Scholar

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2003). Interviewing by the police. In Carson, D. & Bull, R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (pp. 111–125). Wiley.Google Scholar

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2006). Interviewing victims of crime, including children and people with intellectual difficulties. In Kebbell, M. R. & Davies, G. M. (Eds.), Practical psychology for forensic investigations (pp. 7–23). Wiley.Google Scholar

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2016). Witness interviews and crime investigation. In Groome, D. & Eysenck, M. W. (Eds.), An introduction to applied cognitive psychology. Routledge.Google Scholar

Milne, R., Griffiths, A., Clarke, C., & Dando, C. (2019). The Cognitive Interview – a tiered approach in the real world. In Schwartz, B., Dickenson, J., Schreiber Compo, N., & McCauley, M. (Eds.), Evidence-based investigative interviewing (pp. 56–73). Routledge.Google Scholar

Milne, R., & Shaw, G. (1999). Obtaining witness statements: Best practice and proposals for innovation. Medicine, Science and the Law, 39, 127–138.Google Scholar

Milne, R., Shaw, G., & Bull, R. (2007). Investigative interviewing: The role of psychology. In Carson, D., Milne, R., Pakes, F., & Shalev, K. (Eds.), Applying psychology to criminal justice (pp. 65–80). Wiley.Google Scholar

Milne, R., Shawyer, A., Dalton, G., May, B., Nunan, J., & Bull, R. (2020). Interviewing adults: Communication at the frontline. In Shapiro, L. R. & Maras, M.-H. (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of security and emergency management. Springer.Google Scholar

Nunan, J., Milne, R., Shawyer, A., Wakefield, A., Dalton, G., Abbot, R., & Cowup, P. (2016). Don’t break the chain: from effective communication to successful decision-making. Emergency Services Times, 17(6), 50–52.Google Scholar

O’Neill, M., & Milne, B. (2014). Success within criminal investigations: is communication still a key component? In Bull, R. (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 123–146). Springer.Google Scholar

Ord, B., & Shaw, G. (1999). Investigative interviewing explained. New Police Bookshop.Google Scholar

Parker, A. D., & Brown, J. (2000). Detection of deception: Statement Validity Analysis as a means of determining truthfulness or falsity of rape allegations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5(2), 237–259.Google Scholar

Plimmer, J. (1997, February 7). Confession rate. Police Review, pp. 16–18.Google Scholar

Powell, M., & Snow, P. C. (2013). A guide to questioning children during the free-narrative phase of an interview about abuse. Australian Psychologist, 42, 57–65.Google Scholar

Poyser, S., Nurse, A., & Milne, R. (2018). Miscarriages of justice. Policy Press.Google Scholar

Risan, P., Binder, P.-E., & Milne, R. (2016). Regulating and coping with distress during police interviews of traumatized victims. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 8(6), 736–744.Google Scholar

Risan, P., Binder, P.-E., & Milne, R. (2017). Establishing and maintaining rapport in investigative interviews of traumatized victims: A qualitative study. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 12(2), 372–387.Google Scholar

Risan, P., Milne, R., & Binder, P.-E. (2020). Trauma narratives: Recommendations for investigative interviewing. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27(4), 678–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savage, S., & Milne, R. (2007). Miscarriages of justice – the role of the investigative process. In Newburn, T., Williamson, T., & Wright, A. (Eds.), Handbook of criminal investigation. Willan.Google Scholar

Shepherd, E. (1993). Resistance in interviews: The contribution of police perception and behaviour. In Shepherd, E. (Ed.), Aspects of police interviewing (pp. 5–12). The British Psychological Society.Google Scholar

Shepherd, E., & Griffiths, A. (2013). Investigative interviewing: The conversation management approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shepherd, E., & Milne, R. (1999). Full and faithful: Ensuring quality practice and integrity of outcome in witness interviews. In Heaton-Armstrong, A., Wolchover, D., & Shepherd, E. (Eds.), Analysing witness testimony (pp. 124–145). Blackstone Press.Google Scholar

Shepherd, E., & Milne, R. (2006). Have you told the management about this? Bringing witness interviewing into the 21st century. In A. Heaton-Armstrong, Shepherd, E., Gudjonsson, G., & Wolchover, D. (Eds.), Witness testimony: Psychological, investigative, and evidential perspectives (pp. 131–151). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, K., & Milne, B. (2018). Witness interview strategy for critical incidents (WISCI). Journal of Forensic Practice, 20(4), 268–278.Google Scholar

Stockdale, J. E. (1993). Management and supervision of police interviews. Home Office Police Research Group.Google Scholar

Vanderhallen, M., Jaspaert, E., & Vervaeke, G. (2016). SCAN as an investigative tool. Police Practice and Research, 17(3), 279–293.Google Scholar

Vrij, A. (2006). Detecting deception. In Kebbell, M. R. & Davies, G. M. (Eds.), Practical psychology for forensic investigations and prosecutions (pp. 89–102). Wiley.Google Scholar

Walsh, D., King, M., & Griffiths, A. (2017). Evaluating interviews which search for the truth with suspects: But are investigators self-assessments of their own skills truthful ones? Psychology, Crime and Law, 23, 647–665.Google Scholar

Westera, N. J., Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (2011). Interviewing rape complainants: Police officers’ perceptions of interview format and quality of evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 917–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westera, N. J., Kebbell, M. R., Milne, R., & Green, T. (2016). Towards a more effective detective. Policing and Society, 26, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westera, N. J., Powell, M., Milne, R., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2019). Police organizational responses to interviewing victims of sexual offences. In Bull, R. & Blandon-Gitlin, I. (Eds.), Handbook of legal and investigative psychology (pp. 182–196). Routledge.Google Scholar

Wilson, C., & Powell, M. (2001). A guide to interviewing children. Essential skills for counsellors, police, lawyers and social workers. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Ackerman, R., & Koriat, A. (2011). Response latency as a predictor of the accuracy of children’s reports. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(4), 406–417.Google Scholar

American National Academy of Sciences. (2009). Committee on identifying the needs of the forensic sciences community & national research council. Author.Google Scholar

Amsterdam Laboratory for Legal Psychology. (2020). Eyewitness memory in cross-cultural contexts. https://allp.nl/cases/eyewitness-memory-in-cross-cultural-contexts/Google Scholar

Anakwah, N., Horselenberg, H., Hope, L., Amankwah-Poku, M., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2020). Cross-cultural differences in eyewitness memory reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(2), 504–515.Google Scholar

Benton, T. R., Ross, D. F., Bradshaw, E., Thomas, W. N., & Bradshaw, G. S. (2006). Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: Comparing jurors, judges and law enforcement to eyewitness experts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(1), 115–129.Google Scholar

Brewer, N., Caon, A., Todd, C., & Weber, N. (2006). Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency. Law and Human Behavior, 30(1), 31–50.Google Scholar

Brewer, N., Potter, R., Fisher, R. P., Bond, N., & Luszcz, M. A. (1999). Beliefs and data on the relationship between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(4), 297–313.Google Scholar

Dando, C. J., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2008). Victims and witnesses of crime: Police officers’ perceptions of interviewing practices. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 13(1), 59–70.Google Scholar

De Poot, C. J., Bokhorst, R. J., Van Koppen, P. J., & Muller, E. R. (2004). Recherche portret: Over dilemma’s in de opsporing. Kluwer.Google Scholar

Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 687–706.Google Scholar

Dubelaar, M. J. (2014). Betrouwbaar getuigenbewijs: Totstandkoming en waardeing van strafrechtelijke getuigenverklaringen in perspectief (Doctoral dissertation). University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Über das Gedächtnis: Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie. Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Evans, J. R., Schreiber Compo, N., & Russano, M. B. (2009). Intoxicated witnesses and suspects: Procedures and prevalence according to law enforcement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15(3), 194–221.Google Scholar

Fawcett, J. M., Russell, E. J., Peace, K. A., & Christie, J. (2013). Of guns and geese: A meta-analytic review of the ‘weapon focus’ literature. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(1), 35–66.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. P., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). The relation between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. In Davis, G., Lloyd-Bostock, S., McMurran, M., & Wilson, C. (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice: International developments in research and practice (pp. 21–28). De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. P., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Psychological Science, 20(1), 16–19.Google Scholar

Gabbert, F., & Hope, L. (2018). Suggestibility in the courtroom. In Otgaar, H. & Howe, M. L. (Eds.), Finding the truth in the courtroom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Confrey, M. (2018). Witness testimony. In Griffiths, A., & Milne, R. (Eds.), The psychology of criminal investigation: From theory to practice. Routledge.Google Scholar

Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool. Law and Human Behavior, 33(4), 298–307.Google Scholar

Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2012). Protecting against misleading post-event information with the Self-Administered Interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 568–575.Google Scholar

Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 533–543.Google Scholar

Garrett, B. L. (2008). Judging innocence. Columbia Law Review, 108(1), 55–142.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2018). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. Norton.Google Scholar

Gilbert, J. A. E., & Fisher, R. P. (2006). The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(6), 723–739.Google Scholar

Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Hartwig, M. (2005). Eyewitness testimony: Tracing the beliefs of Swedish legal professionals. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(5), 709–727.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A., & Rachlew, A. (2018). From interrogation to investigative interviewing: The application of psychology. In Griffiths, A. & Milne, R. (Eds.), The psychology of criminal investigation. From theory to practice. (pp. 154–178). Routledge.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, P. U., Lindholm, T., & Jönsson, F. U. (2019). Predicting accuracy in eyewitness testimonies with memory retrieval effort and confidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00703Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.Google Scholar

Hewitt, M. (2001). Nine force attrition study. Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.Google Scholar

Hope, L., Gabbert, F., Fisher, R. J., & Jamieson, K. (2014). Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory: The impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(3), 304–313.Google Scholar

Houston, K. A., Hope, L., Memon, A., & Read, J. D. (2013). Expert testimony on eyewitness evidence: In search of common sense. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(5), 637–651.Google Scholar

Innocence Project. (2017). DNA exonerations in the United States. https://innocenceproject.org/dna-exonerations-in-the-united-states/Google Scholar

Innocence Project. (2019). www.innocenceproject.org/Google Scholar

Johnson, M. K. (2006). Memory and reality. American Psychologist, 61(8), 760–771.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85.Google Scholar

Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), 42–52.Google Scholar

Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers’ perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138(3), 323–330.Google Scholar

Lindholm, T., Jönsson, F. U., & Liuzza, M. T. (2018). Retrieval effort cues predict eyewitness accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(4), 534–542.Google Scholar

Lindsay, R. C., Semmler, C., Weber, N., Brewer, N., & Lindsay, M. R. (2008). How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 32(6), 526–535.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (1996). Eyewitness testimony. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12(4), 361–366.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F., Coan, J., & Pickrell, J. E. (1996). Lost in a shopping mall: An experience with controversial research. Ethics & Behavior, 7(3), 271–284.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, R. (1987). Some facts about ‘weapon focus’. Law and Human Behavior, 11(1), 55–62.Google Scholar

MacLin, O. H., MacLin, M. K., & Malpass, R. S. (2001). Race, arousal, attention, exposure and delay: An examination of factors moderating face recognition. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7(1), 134–152.Google Scholar

Mapes, A., De Poot, C. J., & Kloosterman, A. (2014). De rol van DNA bij het vinden van een dader. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 56(3), 29–46.Google Scholar

Mapes, A., Kloosterman, A. D., & De Poot, C. J. (2015). DNA in the criminal justice system: The DNA succes story in perspective. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 60(4), 851–856.Google Scholar

McNally, R. J. (2003). Recovering memories of trauma: A view from the laboratory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 32–35.Google Scholar

Nader, K., Schafe, G. E., & Le Doux, J. (2000). Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature, 406, 722–726.Google Scholar

Netherlands Register of Court Experts. (2020). Standards Legal Psychology (009.0) (Version 2.0). www.nrgd.nl/binaries/Standards%20Legal%20Psychology%202.0%20def_tcm39–421076.pdfGoogle Scholar

O’Brien, M., & Kebbell, M. (2014). Interview techniques in International Criminal Court and Tribunals. In Bull, R. (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 91–101). Springer.Google Scholar

Odinot, G. (2008). Eyewitness confidence: The relation between accuracy and confidence in episodic memory (Doctoral dissertation). University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Odinot, G., Boon, B., & Wolters, L. (2015). Het episodisch geheugen en getuigenverhoor. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 57(3), 279–299.Google Scholar

Odinot, G., Memon, A., La Rooy, D., & Millen, A. (2013). Are two interviews better than one? Eyewitness memory across repeated cognitive interviews. PLoS One, 8(10), e76305.Google Scholar

Odinot, G., & Wolters, G. (2006). Repeated recall, retention interval and the accuracy-confidence relation in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(7), 973–985.Google Scholar

Odinot, G., Wolters, G., & Van Giezen, A. (2012). Accuracy, confidence and consistency in repeated recall of events. Psychology, Crime and Law, 19(7), 1–14.Google Scholar

Odinot, G., Wolters, G., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2009). Eyewitness memory of a supermarket robbery: A case study of accuracy and confidence after 3 months. Law and Human Behavior, 33(6), 506–514.Google Scholar

Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2006). Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12(2), 181–191.Google Scholar

Penrod, S. D., Loftus, E. F., & Winkler, J. (1982). The reliability of eyewitness testimony: A psychological perspective. In Kerr, N. L. & Bray, R. M. (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 119–168). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Powell, M. B., & Bartholomew, T. (2003). Interviewing and assessing clients from different cultural backgrounds: Guidelines for all forensic professionals. In Carson, D. & Bull, R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (pp. 625–643). John Wiley.Google Scholar

Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074.Google Scholar

Schacter, D. L. (2012). Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. American Psychologist, 67(8), 603–613.Google Scholar

Schacter, D. L., & Loftus, E. F. (2013). Memory and law: What can cognitive neuroscience contribute? Nature Neuroscience, 16(2), 119–123.Google Scholar

Smeets, T., Candel, I., & Merckelbach, H. (2004). Accuracy, completeness, and consistency of emotional memories. The American Journal of Psychology, 117(4), 595–610.Google Scholar

Spencer, J. R. (2016). Adversarial vs inquisitorial systems: Is there still such a difference? The International Journal of Human Rights, 20(5), 601–616.Google Scholar

Talarico, J. M., & Rubin, D. C. (2003). Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories. Psychological Science, 14(5), 455–461.Google Scholar

Van Koppen, P. J., & Penrod, S. D. (2003). Adversarial or inquisitorial. In van Koppen, P. J. & Penrod, S. D. (Eds.), Adversarial versus inquisitorial justice: Psychological perspectives on criminal justice systems (pp. 1–19). Plenum.Google Scholar

Van Oorsouw, K., & Merckelbach, H. (2012). The effects of alcohol on crime‐related memories: A field study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 82–90.Google Scholar

Van Oorsouw, K., Merckelbach, H., & Smeets, T. (2015). Alcohol intoxication impairs memory and increases suggestibility for a mock crime: A field study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(4), 493–501.Google Scholar

Vredeveldt, A., Charman, S. D., Den Blanken, A., & Hooydonk, M. (2018). Effects of cannabis on eyewitness memory: A field study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(4), 420–428.Google Scholar

Vredeveldt, A., Groen, R. N., Ampt, J. E., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2017). When discussion between eyewitnesses helps memory. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22(2), 242–259.Google Scholar

Vredeveldt, A., Hildebrandt, A., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2016). Acknowledge, repeat, rephrase, elaborate: Witnesses can help each other remember more. Memory, 24(5), 669–682.Google Scholar

Vredeveldt, A., Van Deuren, S., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2019). Remembering with a stranger: Comparing acquainted and unacquainted pairs in collaborative eyewitness interviews. Memory, 27(10), 1390–1403.Google Scholar

Vredeveldt, A., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2018). Recounting a common experience: On the effectiveness of instructing eyewitness pairs. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–11.Google Scholar

Vredeveldt, A., Van Koppen, P. J., & Granhag, P. A. (2014). The inconsistent suspect: A systematic review of consistency in truth tellers and liars. In Bull, R. (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 183–207). Springer.Google Scholar

Wagenaar, W. A., & van der Schrier, J. H. (1996). Face recognition as a function of distance and illumination: A practical tool for use in the courtroom. Psychology, Crime & Law, 2(4), 321–332.Google Scholar

Wells, G. L. (1978). Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1546–1557.Google Scholar

Wise, R. A., & Safer, M. A. (2004). What US judges know and believe about eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(4), 427–443.Google Scholar

Wise, R. A., Safer, M. A., & Maro, C. M. (2011). What U.S. law enforcement officers know and believe about eyewitness factors, eyewitness interviews and identification procedures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 488–500.Google Scholar

Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2018). Rethinking the reliability of eyewitness memory. Perspectives of Psychological Science, 13(3), 324–335.Google Scholar

Woolnough, P. S., & MacLeod, M. D. (2001). Watching the birdie watching you: Eyewitness memory for actions using CCTV recordings of actual crimes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 395–411.Google Scholar

Wright, D. B., Memon, A., Skagerberg, E. M., & Gabbert, F. (2009). When eyewitnesses talk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 174–178.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar

Beaver, K. M., Rowland, M. W., Schwartz, J. A., & Nedelec, J. L. (2011). The genetic origins of psychopathic personality traits in adult males and females: Results from an adoption-based study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(5), 426–432.Google Scholar

Bernstein, D. P., Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., Walker, E., Pogge, D., Ahluvalia, T., Stokes, J., Handelsman, L., Medrano, M., Desmond, D., Zule, W. (2003). Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27, 169–190.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R. (2007). Personality disorder and antisocial deviance: Comments on the debate on the structure of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(2), 142–159.Google Scholar

Briere, J. (2010). Trauma Symptom Inventory – 2nd edition (TSI-2) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). Mosby.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J. (1996). Psychopathic personality in different cultures: What do we know? What do we need to find out?. Journal of Personality Disorders, 10(1), 23–40.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J. (2010). Personality disorder and violence: Understand violence risk: An introduction to the special section personality disorder and violence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24(5), 539–550.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J. (2016). Violence risk: The actuarial illusion. In D. Farrington & A. Kapardis (Eds.), Psychology, crime, policing and courts. Routledge.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J. (2018). Psychopathic personality disorder: Capturing an elusive concept. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 14(1), 15–32.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., Hart, S. D., Logan, C., & Michie, C. (2004). Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality–Institutional Rating Scale (CAPP–IRS). Unpublished manual.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., Hart, S. D., Logan, C., & Michie, C. (2012). Explicating the Construct of Psychopathy: Development and Validation of a Conceptual Model, the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP). International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(4), 242–252.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., & Logan, C. (2015). Capturing clinical complexity: Towards a personality-oriented measure of psychopathy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(4), 262–273.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., & Logan, C. (2018). Capturing psychopathic personality: Penetrating the mask of sanity through clinical interview. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), The handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (1999). Psychopathy across cultures: North America and Scotland Compared. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108(1), 55–68.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 171.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2010). Limitations of diagnostic precision and predictive utility in the individual case: A challenge for forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 34(4), 258–274.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Clark, D. A. (2004). Reconstructing psychopathy: Clarifying the significance of antisocial and socially deviant behavior in the diagnosis of psychopathic personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(4), 337–357.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Clark, D. (2005). Assessing psychopathy in the UK: Concerns about cross-cultural generalisability. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 186(4), 335–341.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., & Skeem, J. L. (2007). Understanding the structure of the Psychopathy Checklist Revised: An exploration of methodological confusion. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(Suppl. 49), 39–50.Google Scholar

Cooke, D. J., & Sellbom, M. (2019). An examination of Psychopathy Checklist-Revised latent factor structure via exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 31(5), 581.Google Scholar

DeMatteo, D., Edens, J. F., Galloway, M., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., Koller, J. P., & Bersoff, B. (2014). Investigating the role of the Psychopathy Checklist?Revised in United States case law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 11.Google Scholar

DeMatteo, D., Hart, S. D., Heilbrun, K., Boccaccini, M. T., Cunningham, M. D., Douglas, K. S., Dvoskin, J. A., Edens, J. F., Guy, L. S., Murrie, D. C., Otto, R. K., Packer, I. K., & Reidy, T. J. (2020). Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(2), 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiGiuseppe, R., & Tafrate, R. C. (2004). Anger Disorders Scale (ADS): Technical manual. Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20V3: Assessing risk for violence: User guide. Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar

Douglas, K. S., Vincent, G. M., & Edens, J. F. (2018). Risk for criminal recidivism: The role of psychopathy. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Edens, J. F., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., DeMatteo, D., & Sörman, K. (2015). How reliable are Psychopathy Checklist–Revised scores in Canadian criminal trials? A case law review. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 447.Google Scholar

Edworthy, R., Sampson, S., & Völlm, B. (2016). Inpatient forensic-psychiatric care: Legal frameworks and service provision in three European countries. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 47, 18–27.Google Scholar

Ellingson, J. M., Littlefield, A. K., Verges, A., & Sher, K. J. (2018). Psychopathy and substance abuse disorders. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1993). Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) [Database record]. APA PsycTests.Google Scholar

Fallon Report. (1999). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Personality Disorder Unit, Ashworth Special Hospital VOLUME 1 His Honour Peter Fallon QC Professor Robert Bluglass CBE Professor Brian Edwards CBE Mr Granville Daniels Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Health by Command of Her Majesty, January 1999 Cm 4194-ii.Google Scholar

Farrington, D. P., & Bergstrom, H. (2018). Family background and psychopathy. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 354–379). Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Forouzan, E., & Cooke, D. J. (2005). Figuring out la femme fatale: Conceptual and assessment issues concerning psychopathy in females. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(6), 765–778.Google Scholar

Flórez, G., Ferrer, V., García, L. S., Crespo, M. R., Pérez, M., Saiz, P. A., & Cooke, D. J. (2020). Comparison between the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised and the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality in a representative sample of Spanish prison inmates. Plos One, 15(2), e0228384.Google Scholar

Gatner, D. (2019). How much does that cost? Examining the economic costs of crime in North America attributable to people with psychopathic personality disorder (Unpublished dissertation). Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar

Grisso, T. (1986). Evaluating competencies: forensic assessments and instruments (1st ed.). Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D. (1980). A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 1(2), 111–119.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D., Cooke, D. J., & Hart, S. D. (1999). Psychopathy and sadistic personality disorder. In Millon, T., Blaney, P. H., & Davis, R. D. (Eds.), Oxford textbooks in clinical psychology: Vol. 4. Oxford textbook of psychopathology (p. 555–584). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D., Neumann, C. S., & Mokros, A. (2018). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, properties, debates, and new directions. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2006). Treatment of psychopathy. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D. (1998). Psychopathy and risk for violence. In Cooke, D. J., Forth, A. E. & Hare, R. D. (Eds.), Psychopathy: Theory, research and implications for society (pp. 355–374). Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D. (2001). Forensic issues. In Livesley, W. J. (Ed.), Forensic and clinical issues in the assessment of psychopathy (pp. 555–569). Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D. (2016). Culture and violence risk assessment: The case of Ewert v. Canada. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 3(2), 76.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D., & Cook, A. N. (2012). Current issues in the assessment and diagnosis of psychopathy (psychopathic personality disorder). Neuropsychiatry, 2(6), 497–508.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D., Cox, D. N., & Hare, R. D. (1995). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (1st ed.). Multi-Health Systems Inc.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D., & Logan, C., (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. In Sturmey, P. & McMurran, M. (Eds.), Forensic case formulation (pp. 83–106). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hart, S. D., Michie, C., & Cooke, D. J. (2007). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the ‘margins of error’ of group v. individual predictions of violence. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(S49), s60–s65.Google Scholar

Henderson, D. K. (1939). Psychopathic states. W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Karpman, B. (1948). The myth of psychopathic personality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 104(9), 523–534.Google Scholar

Kreis, M. K., & Cooke, D. J. (2011). Capturing the psychopathic female: A prototypicality analysis of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP) across gender. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29(5), 634–648.Google Scholar

Larsen, R. R., Jalava, J., & Griffiths, S. (2020). Are Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-R) psychopaths dangerous, untreatable, and without conscience? A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Psychopathy, Public Policy, and Law, 26(3), 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenzenweger, M. F., Lane, M. C., Loranger, A. W., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). DSM-IV personality disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biological psychiatry, 62(6), 553–564.Google Scholar

Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in non-criminal populations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(3), 488–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Logan, C., & Weizmann-Henelius, G. (2012). Psychopathy in women: presentation, assessment, and management. In Psychopathy and law: A practitioner’s guide. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lynam, D. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2007). Longitudinal evidence that psychopathy scores in early adolescence predict adult psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116(1), 155.Google Scholar

Lynam, D. R., Gaughan, E. T., Miller, J. D., Miller, D. J., Mullins-Sweatt, S., & Widiger, T. A. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marshall, L. A., & Cooke, D. J. (1999). The childhood experiences of psychopaths: A retrospective study of familial and societal factors. Journal of Personality Disorders, 13(3), 211–225.Google Scholar

Miller, A. K., Rufino, K. A., Boccaccini, M. T., Jackson, R. L., & Murrie, D. C. (2011). On individual differences in person perception: Raters’ personality traits relate to their Psychopathy Checklist-Revised scoring tendencies. Assessment, 18(2), 253–260.Google Scholar

Millon, T. (1981). Disorders of personality. Wiley.Google Scholar

Millon, T. (2011). Classifying personality disorders: An evolution-based alternative to an evidence-based approach. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(3), 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moreira, D., Moreira, D. S., Oliveira, S., Ribeiro, F. N., Barbosa, F., Fávero, M., & Gomes, V. (2020). Relationship between adverse childhood experiences and psychopathy: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 101452.Google Scholar

Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Guarnera, L. A., & Rufino, K. A. (2013). Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them?. Psychological science, 24(10), 1889–1897.Google Scholar

Murphy, J. M. (1976). Psychiatric labelling in cross-cultural perspective: Similar kinds of disturbed behavior appear to be labelled abnormal in diverse cultures. Science, 191(4231), 1019–1028.Google Scholar

Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and psychopathology, 21(3), 913–938.Google Scholar

Polaschek, D. L., & Skeem, J. (2018). Treatment of adults and juveniles with psychopathy. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Poythress, N., & Petrila, J. P. (2010). PCL-R psychopathy: threats to sue, peer review, and potential implications for science and law. A commentary. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9(1), 3–10.Google Scholar

Preszler, J., Marcus, D. K., Edens, J. F., & McDermott, B. E. (2018). Network analysis of psychopathy in forensic patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(2), 171.Google Scholar

Repo-Tiihonen, E., Virkkunen, M., & Tiihonen, J. (2001). Mortality of antisocial male criminals. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 12(3), 677–683.Google Scholar

Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Cormier, C. A. (1992). An evaluation of a maximum-security therapeutic community for psychopaths and other mentally disordered offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 16(4), 399–412.Google Scholar

Schneider, K. (1958). Psychopathic personalities (9th ed.). Cassell.Google Scholar

Salekin, R. T. (2002). Psychopathy and therapeutic pessimism: Clinical lore or clinical reality? Clinical Psychology Review, 22(1), 79–112.Google Scholar

Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality Disorders, 69(6), 847–879.Google Scholar

Sellbom, M., & Cooke, D. J. (2019). Manual for the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality – Self-Report (CAPP-SR). Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Sellbom, M., Lilienfeld, S. O., Fowler, K. A., & McCrary, K. L. (2018). The self-report assessment of psychopathy: Problems, pitfalls, and promises. In Patrick, C. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Shariat, S. V., Assadi, S. M., Noroozian, M., Pakravannejad, M., Yahyazadeh, O., Aghayan, S., Michie, C., & Cooke, D. (2010). Psychopathy in Iran: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24(5), 676–691.Google Scholar

Shepherd, E. (2019). The Hunt for Non-Barking Dogs and Other Curiosities: Identifying and Managing Anomaly Within Forensic Interviews. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 18(1), 66–84.Google Scholar

Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010a). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 433–445.Google Scholar

Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010b). One measure does not a construct make: Directions toward reinvigorating psychopathy research. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 455–459.Google Scholar

Tolman, A. O., & Mullendore, K. B. (2003). Risk evaluations of the courts: Is service quality a function of specialization. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 225–232.Google Scholar

Tew, J., & Atkinson, R. (2013). The Chromis programme: from conception to evaluation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(5–6), 415–431.Google Scholar

Tew, J., Bennett, A., & Dixon, L. (2020). The Chromis programme: Exploratory research using multiple case studies. London: HM Prison & Probation Service, Ministry of Justice Analytical Series.Google Scholar

Verschuere, B., & te Kaat, L. (2019). What are the core features of psychopathy? A prototypicality analysis using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). Journal of Personality Disorders, 1–10.Google Scholar

Verschuere, B., van Ghesel Grothe, S., Waldorp, L., Watts, A. L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., & Noordhof, A. (2018). What features of psychopathy might be central? A network analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) in three large samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000315Google Scholar

Viding, E., & Larsson, H. (2010). Genetics of child and adolescent psychopathy. In Salekin, R. T. & Lynam, D. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Child and Adolescent Psychopathy (pp. 113–134). Guilford Press.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th ed.). https://icd.who.int/Google Scholar

Yang, M., Wong, S., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 740–767.Google Scholar

Adshead, G. (2001). Murmurs of discontent: Treatment and treatability of personality disorder. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 7(6), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.7.6.407Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.Google Scholar

Babchishin, K. M., Nunes, K. L., & Hermann, C. A. (2013). The Validity of the implicit association test (IAT) measures of sexual attraction to children: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sex Behaviour, 42(3), 487–99.Google Scholar

Banse, R., Schmidt, A. F., & Clarbour, J. (2010). Indirect measures of sexual interest in child sex offenders: A multimethod approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 319–335.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., Robertson, M. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(7), 813–22.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S, Robinson, J., & Woodbury-Smith, M. (2006). The Adult Asperger Assessment (AAA): A diagnostic method. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 35(6), 807–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory–II. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Bernstein, D. P., Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., Walker, E., Pogge, D., Ahluvalia, T., Stokes, J., Handelsman, L., Medrano, M., Desmond, D., & Zule, W. (2003). Development and validation of a brief screening version of the childhood trauma questionnaire. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27(2), 169–190.Google Scholar

Birchwood, M., Gilbert, P., Gilbert, J., Trower, P., Meaden, A., Hay, J., Murray, E., & Miles, J. N. V. (2004). Interpersonal and role-related schema influence the relationship with the dominant ‘voice’ in schizophrenia: A comparison of three models. Journal of Psychological Medicine, 34, 1571–1580.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R. (1998). Criminality and the interpersonal circle in mentally disordered offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25(2), 155–176.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R., Logan, C., Donnelly, J., & Renwick, S. (2003). Personality disorders, psychopathy and other mental disorders: Co-morbidity among patients at English and Scottish high-security hospitals. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 14(1), 111–137.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R., Logan, C., Renwick, S., & Donnelly, J. (2005). Higher-order dimensions of personality disorder: Hierarchical structure and relationships with the five-factor model, the interpersonal circle, and psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(6), 597–623.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R., & Renwick, S. J. (1996). Rating scales for measuring the interpersonal circle in forensic psychiatric patients. Psychological Assessment, 8(1), 76–84.Google Scholar

Blom-Cooper, Sir L., Brown, M., Dolan, R., & Murphy, E. (1992). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Complaints about Ashworth Hospital, Cmnd 2028, vols 1 and 2 (Chairman: Sir Louis Blom-Cooper). HMSO.Google Scholar

Boer, D. P., Tough, S., & Haaven, J. (2004). Assessment of risk manageability of intellectual disabled sex offenders. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(4), 275–283.Google Scholar

Boer, D. P., Wilson, R. J., Gauthier, C. M., & Hart, S. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk – 20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. British Columbia Institute Against Family Violence.Google Scholar

Briere, J. (2011). Trauma Symptom Inventory–2 (TSI–2). Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Bruce, T. (2015). The DSM-5 definition of mental disorder: Critique and alternatives. Critical Thinking in Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis, 9(64), 45–68.Google Scholar

Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230.Google Scholar

Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Cappai, A., Wells, J., Tapp, J., et al. (2017). Substance misuse in personality disorder and schizophrenia: findings and clinical implications from a high secure hospital. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-07–2016–0035Google Scholar

Chadwick, P., Lees, S., Birchwood, M. (2000). The revised Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ-R). British Journal of Psychiatry, 177(3), 229–232.Google Scholar

Collins, N. (2020). The use of polygraph test in clinical forensic psychiatry setting. In Igoumenou, A. (Ed.), Ethical issues in clinical forensic psychiatry (pp. 85–96). Springer.Google Scholar

Daffern, M., Jones, L., & Shine, J. (2010). Wiley series in forensic clinical psychology. Offence paralleling behaviour: A case formulation approach to offender assessment and intervention. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Davidson, M., Humphreys, M. S., Johnstone, E. C., & Cunningham Owens, D. G. (1995). Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among remand prisoners in Scotland. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 545–548.Google Scholar

Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(85). www.sjdm.org/dmidi/Interpersonal_Reactivity_Index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Dean, C., & Perkins, D. (2008). Penile plethysmography. Prison Service Journal, 178, 20–25.Google Scholar

de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries, R. (2009). SAPROF: Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk (English version). Forum Educatief.Google Scholar

DiGiuseppe, R., & Tafrate, R. C. (2004). The Anger Disorder Scale: Technical manual. Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., et al. (2013). Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20, Version 3 (HCR-20V3): Development and Overview. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 93–108.Google Scholar

D’Zurilla, T., Nezu, A., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2002). Social Problem-Solving Inventory–Revised (SPSI-R): Manual. Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Edworthy, R., Sampson, S., & Vollm, B. (2016). Inpatient forensic-psychiatric care: Legal frameworks and service provision in three European countries. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 47, 18–27.Google Scholar

Eke, A. W., Helmus, L. M., & Seto, M. C. (2019). A Validation Study of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT). Sexual Abuse, 31(4), 456–476.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1993).?Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R)?[Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t05461-000Google Scholar

First, M. B., & Gibbon, M. (2004). The structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders (SCID-I) and the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II disorders (SCID-II). In Hilsenroth, M. & Segalaniel, D. L. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment: Vol. 2. Personality assessment (pp. 134–143). John Wiley.Google Scholar

Gudjonsson, G. H., & Singh, K. K. (1989). The revised Gudjonsson blame attribution inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(1), 67–70.Google Scholar

Hammond, S. M., & O’Rourke, M. M. (2004) Developing a psychometric model of risk. Issues in Forensic Psychology, 5, 100–114.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report No. 97–04). Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Mcgrath, R, Kroner, D., et al. (2017). A five-level risk and needs system: Maximizing assessment results in corrections through the development of a common language. http://saratso.org/pdf/A_Five_Level_Risk_and_Needs_System_Report.pdfGoogle Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154 –1163.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Scott, H. (1995). Assessing perspective taking among sexual offenders, nonsexual criminals and non-offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 259–277.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessment for sexual offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behaviour, 24(1), 119–136.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Harper, C. A., Bartels, R. M., & Hogue, T. E. (2016). Reducing stigma and punitive attitudes toward pedophiles through narrative humanization. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30(5), 533–555.Google Scholar

Hart, S., Douglas, K. S., & Guy, L. (2016). The structured professional judgment approach to violence risk assessment: Origins, nature, and advances. In Craig, L. & Rettenberger, M. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment, treatment of sexual offending (Vol. 2, pp. 643–666). John Wiley.Google Scholar

Hart, S., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R.; with Klaver, J., Logan, C, & Watt, K. A. (2003). The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP): Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. The Institute Against Family Violence.Google Scholar

Heather, N., & Rollnick, S. (1993). Readiness to Change Questionnaire: User’s manual. University of New South Wales.Google Scholar

Hogue, T., Wesson, C., & Perkins, D. (2016). Eye tracking and assessing sexual interests in forensic contexts. In Boer, D. P. (Ed.), Theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending. John Wiley.Google Scholar

Home Office/Department of Health. (1986). Offenders suffering from a psychopathic disorder: A joint DHSS/HO consultation document. Home Office/Department of Health.Google Scholar

Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (Eds.). (2014). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed.). RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Jones, L. (2004). Offence paralleling behaviour (OPB) as a framework for assessment and interventions with offenders. In Needs, A. & Towl, G. (Eds.), Applying psychology to forensic practice (pp. 34–63). Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. W., & Eaves, D. (1995). Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (2nd ed.). Institute on Family Violence.Google Scholar

Loranger, A. W., Janca, A., & Sartorius, N. (1997). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorders: The ICD-10 Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maden, A. (2007). Dangerous and severe personality disorder: Antecedents and origins. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 49(49), 8–11.Google Scholar

Markham, S. (2020). Collaborative risk assessment in secure and forensic mental health settings in the UK. General Psychiatry, 33, 1–6.Google Scholar

McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., Rollins, J., & Kinch, J. (2003). TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18(3), 219–238.Google Scholar

Mental Health Act. (2007). Amendments to Mental Health Act 1983. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/12/contentsGoogle Scholar

Mezzich, J. E. (2002). International surveys on the use of ICD-10 and related diagnostic systems. Psychopathology, 35, 72–75.Google Scholar

Millon, T., Grossman, S., & Millon, C. (2015). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–IV manual. Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar

Morey, L. C. (2004). The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). In Maruish, M. E. (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Instruments for adults (pp. 509–551). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Murphy, L., Gottfried, E., Dimario, K., Perkins, D, & Fedoroff, P. (2020). Use of penile plethysmography in the court: A review of practices in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 38(2), 79–99.Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2009). Borderline personality disorder: Treatment and management (NICE Guideline No. 78). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg78Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2013). Antisocial personality disorder: Prevention and management (NICE Guideline No. 77). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg77Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2016). Mental health problems in people with learning disabilities: Prevention, assessment and management (NICE Guideline No. 54). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng54Google Scholar

Ó Ciardha, C., Barnoux, M., Alleyne, E., Tyler, N., Mozova, K., & Gannon, T. (2015). Multiple factors in the assessment of firesetters’ fire interest and attitudes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20(1), 37–47.Google Scholar

Olver, M. E., Wong, S. C. P., Nicholaichuk, T., & Gordon, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale – Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19(3), 318–329.Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L. (1999). Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS): The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding-7 (user’s manual). Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In Braun, H., Jackson, D., & Wiley, D. (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 39–69). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Perkins, D., Farr, C., Romero, J., Kirkpatrick, T., & Ebrahimjee, A. (2015). DSPD ten years on at Broadmoor. The Prison Service Journal, 128, 10–16.Google Scholar

Santtila, P., Mokros, A., Viljanen, K., Koivisto, M., Sandnabba, N. K., Zappalà, A., et al. (2009). Assessment of sexual interest using a choice reaction time task and priming: A feasibility study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(5), 1081–1090.Google Scholar

Schmidt, A. F., & Perkins, D. E. (2020). Using the Explicit and Implicit Sexual Interest Profile (EISIP) in applied forensic or clinical contexts. In Akerman, G., Perkins, D., & Bartels, R. (Eds.), Assessing and managing problematic sexual interests. Routledge.Google Scholar

Seto, M. C., & Eke, A. W. (2015). Predicting recidivism among adult male child pornography offenders: Development of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT). Law Human Behaviour, 39(4), 416–429.Google Scholar

Smith, G. P. (1997). Assessment of malingering with self-report instruments. In Rogers, R. (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 351–370). Guilford.Google Scholar

Snowden, R. J., Wichter, J., & Gray, N. S. (2008). Implicit and explicit measurements of sexual preference in gay and heterosexual men: A comparison of priming techniques and the Implicit Association Task. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 37(4), 558–565.Google Scholar

Spielberger, D. C. (1999). STAXI-2 state trait anger expression inventory-2, professional manual. PAR.Google Scholar

Stephens, S., Seto, M. C., Cantor, J. M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2019). The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2) may be a measure of pedohebephilia. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 16(10), 1655–1663.Google Scholar

Tennent, G., Tennent, D., Prins, H., & Bedford, A. (1993). Is psychopathic disorder a treatable condition? Medicine, Science and the Law, 33(1), 63–66.Google Scholar

Thornton, D. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 139–153.Google Scholar

Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., & Erikson, M. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 225–235; discussion 236–246.Google Scholar

Tyrer, P., Mulder, R., Crawford, M., Newton-Howes, G., Simonsen, E., Ndetei, D., Koldobsky, N., Fossati, A., Mbatia, J., & Barrett, B. (2010). Personality disorder: A new global perspective. World Psychiatry, 9(1), 56–60.Google Scholar

Walker, J. S. (2005). The Maudsley Violence Questionnaire: Initial validation and reliability. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(1), 187–201.Google Scholar

Walters, G. D. (1995). The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles. Part I-III: Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 307–325.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2010). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar

Weschler, D. (2010). Wechsler Memory Scale (4th ed.). Pearson.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2011). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2011). Test of Premorbid Functioning. UK version (TOPF UK). Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2016). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Fourth Edition. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Wong, S. C. P., Olver, M. E., Nicholaichuk, T. P., & Gordon, A. (2003). Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version (VRS-SO). Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (1990). Young Schema Questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.Google Scholar

Allan, R., Lindsay, W. R., Macleod, F., & Smith, A. H. W. (2001). Treatment of women with intellectual disabilities who have been involved with the criminal justice system for reasons of aggression. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual disabilities, 14(4), 340–347.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental. American Psychiatric Pub.Google Scholar

British Psychological Society (2015). Guidance on the assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disabilities in adulthood. Leicester: BPS.Google Scholar

Brookbanks, W., & Freckelton, I. (2018). Legal issues concerning offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities. In Lindsay, W. & Taylor, J. L. (Eds.), Wiley Handbook on Offenders with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (pp. 56–85). London: Wiley.Google Scholar

Care Quality Commission (2011). Count me in 2010: Results of the 2010 national census of inpatients and patients on supervised community treatment in mental health and learning disability services in England and Wales. London: Care Quality Commission.Google Scholar

Clare, I. C. H., Murphy, G. H., Cox, D., & Chaplin, E. H. (1992). Assessment and treatment of firesetting: A single case investigation using a cognitive behavioural model. Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health, 2(3), 253–268.Google Scholar

Cohen, G., & Harvey, J. (2016). The use of psychological interventions for adult male sex offenders with a learning disability: A systematic review. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 22(2), 206–223.Google Scholar

Conolly, J. (1847). The construction and government of lunatic asylums and hospitals for the insane. London: John Churchill. https://books.google.co.ukGoogle Scholar

Courtney, J., & Rose, J. (2004). The effectiveness of treatment for male sex offenders with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 10(2), 215–236.Google Scholar

Crocker, A. J., Cote, G., Toupin, J., & St-Onge, B. (2007). Rate and characteristics of men with an intellectual disability in pre-trial detention. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 143–152.Google Scholar

Davidson, M., Humphreys, M. S., Johnstone, E. C., Cunningham Owens, D. G. (1995). Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among remand prisoners in Scotland. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 545–548.Google Scholar

Department of Health (2001). Valuing people: A new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century. Cm 5086. London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar

Department of Health (2012a). Transforming care: A national response to Winterbourne View Hospital. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar

Department of Health (2015). Mental Health Act 1983: Code of practice. Norwich: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar

Department of Health and Social Security (1971). Better services for the mentally handicapped. London: Author.Google Scholar

Drope v Missouri, 420 US 162 (1975).Google Scholar

Dusky v United States, 362 US 402 (1960).Google Scholar

Emerson, E. (2004). Deinstitutionalisation in England. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 29, 17–22.Google Scholar

Emerson, E., & Halpin, S. (2013). Anti-social behaviour and police contact among 13- to 15-year-old English adolescents with and without mild/moderate intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26(5), 362–369.Google Scholar

Farrington, D. P. (1995). The development of offending and antisocial behaviour from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 6(36), 929–64.Google Scholar

Fazel, S., Xenitidis, K., & Powell, J. (2008). The prevalence of intellectual disabilities among 12,000 prisoners: A systematic review. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31(4), 369–373.Google Scholar

Freckelton, I. (2016). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, expert evidence and the unreliability of admissions during police interview. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(2), 173–183. Doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1149898Google Scholar

Freckelton, I. (2019). Expert evidence: Law, practice and procedure, 6th edn, Sydney: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar

Gall, J. A. M., & Freckelton, I. (1999). Fitness for interview: Current trends, views and an approach to the assessment procedure. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 6(4), 213–223.Google Scholar

Gannon, T. A., Olver, M. E., Mallion, J. S., & James, M. (2019). Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clinical Psychology Review, 73, 101752.Google Scholar

Goodman, R., Simonoff, E., & Stevenson, J. (1995). The impact of child IQ, parent IQ and sibling IQ on child and behaviour deviance scores. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 36(3), 409–425.Google Scholar

Gray, N. S., Fitzgerald, S., Taylor, J., MacCulloch, M., & Snowden, R. (2007). Predicting future reconviction in offenders with intellectual disabilities: The predictive efficacy of the VRAG, PCL-SV and the HCR-20. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 474–79.Google Scholar

Hall, I., Clayton, P., & Johnson, P. (2005). Arson and learning disability. In Riding, T., Swann, C. & Swann, B. (Eds.), The handbook of forensic learning disabilities (pp. 51–72). Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.Google Scholar

Hall v Florida, 134 S Ct 1986 (2014).Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders. (User report 1999-02). Ottowa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.Google Scholar

Hayes, S. (2018). Criminal behavior and intellectual and developmental disabilities. In Lindsay, W. R. & Taylor, J. L. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Research, training and practice (pp 21–37). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Health and Social Care Information Centre (2014). Inpatients formally detained in hospitals under the Mental Health Act 1983, and patients subject to community treatment: Annual report, England, 2013/14. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre.Google Scholar

Heaton, K. M. & Murphy, G. H. (2013). Men with intellectual disabilities who have attended sex offender treatment groups: A follow-up. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26(5), 489–500.Google Scholar

Heddell, F. (1980). Accident of birth: Aspects of mental handicap. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar

Hogue, T., Steptoe, L., Taylor, J. L., Lindsay, W. R., Mooney, P., Pinkney, L., Johnston, S., Smith, A. H. W., & O’Brien, G. (2006). A comparison of offenders with intellectual disability across three levels of security. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 16(1), 13–28.Google Scholar

Holland, S., & Persson, P. (2011). Intellectual disability in the Victorian prison system: Characteristics of prisoners with an intellectual disability released from prison in 2003–2006. Psychology, Crime and Law, 17(1), 25–41.Google Scholar

Jones, E., & Chaplin, E. (2017). A systematic review of the effectiveness of psychological approaches in the treatment of sex offenders with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. DOI: 10.1111/jar.12345Google Scholar

Kerlin, I. N. (1858). A brief history of twenty-two imbecile children. Philadelphia, PA: Hunt.Google Scholar

Kim, B., Benekos, P. J., & Merlo, A. V. (2016). Sex offender recidivism revisited: Review of recent meta-analyses on the effects of sex offender treatment. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 17(1), 105–117.Google Scholar

Klimecki, M. R., Jenkinson, J., & Wilson, L. (1994). A study of recidivism among offenders with intellectual disability. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities. 19(3), 209–219.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R. (2009). The treatment of sex offenders with developmental disabilities. A practice workbook. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R., Allan, R., Macleod, F., Smart, N., & Smith, A. H. W. (2003). Long term treatment and management of violent tendencies of men with intellectual disabilities convicted of assault. Mental Retardation, 41(1), 47–56.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R., Allan, R., Parry, C., Macleod, F., Cottrell, J., Overend, H., & Smith, A. H. W. (2004). Anger and aggression in people with intellectual disabilities: Treatment and follow-up of consecutive referrals and a waiting list comparison. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 11(4), 225–264.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R., & Dernevik, M. (2013). Risk and offenders with intellectual disabilities. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 23, 151–157.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R., Hogue, T. E., Taylor, J. L., Steptoe, L., Mooney, P., O’Brien, G., Johnston, S., & Smith, A. H. W. (2008). Risk assessment in offenders with intellectual disability: A comparison across three levels of security. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52(1), 90–111.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R., Steptoe, L., Wallace, L., Haut, F., & Brewster, E. (2013). An evaluation and 20 year follow up of recidivism in a community intellectual disability service. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 23(2), 138–49.Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. R., Taylor, J. L., & Murphy, G. H. (2018). The treatment and management of sex offenders. In Lindsay, W. R. & Taylor, J. L. (Eds.). The Wiley handbook on offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Research, training and practice, pp. 229–247. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar