Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(5), 830.Google Scholar

Abbey, A. (1987). Misperceptions of friendly behavior as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(2), 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, R. D., & Noonan, K. M. (1979). Concealment of ovulation, parental care, and human social evolution. In Chagnon, N. & Irons, W. (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: An anthropological perspective (pp. 436–453). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.Google Scholar

Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersson, M., & Iwasa, Y. (1996). Sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11(2), 53–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Apicella, C. L., & Barrett, H. C. (2016). Cross-cultural evolutionary psychology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(3–4), 249–266.Google Scholar

Archer, J., & Thanzami, V. (2007). The relation between physical aggression, size and strength, among a sample of young Indian men. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 627–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnocky, S., Perilloux, C., Cloud, J. M., Bird, B. M., & Thomas, K. (2016). Envy mediates the link between social comparison and appearance enhancement in women. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2(2), 71–83.Google Scholar

Arnocky, S., & Piché, T. (2014). Cosmetic surgery as intrasexual competition: The mediating role of social comparison. Psychology, 5, 1197–1205.Google Scholar

Arnqvist, G. (1997). The evolution of animal genitalia: Distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 60(3), 365–379.Google Scholar

Arnqvist, G. (1998). Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature, 393(6687), 784–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnqvist, G., & Rowe, L. (2005). Sexual conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atari, M., Chegeni, R., & Fathi, L. (2017). Women who are interested in cosmetic surgery want it all: The association between considering cosmetic surgery and women’s mate preferences. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 3(1), 61–70.Google Scholar

Baker, R. R. (1996). Copulation, masturbation, and infidelity. In Schmitt, A., Atzwanger, K., Grammer, K., & Schäfer, K. (Eds.), New aspects of human ethology (pp. 163–188). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar

Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1995). Human sperm competition: Copulation, masturbation and infidelity. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Barbaro, N., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015a). Solving the problem of partner infidelity: Individual mate retention, coalitional mate retention, and in-pair copulation frequency. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbaro, N., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015b). Sperm competition risk and sexual coercion predict copulatory duration in humans. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(4), 1474704915618411.Google Scholar

Barbaro, N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2016). Female-directed violence as a form of sexual coercion in humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 130(4), 321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(5), 395–424.Google Scholar

Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2(3), 349–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 242–273.Google Scholar

Bendixen, M., Kennair, L. E. O., Biegler, R., & Haselton, M. G. (2019). Adjusting signals of sexual interest in the most recent naturally occurring opposite-sex encounter in two different contexts. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 13(4), 345.Google Scholar

Benshoof, L., & Thornhill, R. (1979). The evolution of monogamy and concealed ovulation in humans. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 2(2), 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradshaw, H. K., Leyva, R. P., Nicolas, S. C., & Hill, S. E. (2019). Costly female appearance-enhancement provides cues of short-term mating effort: The case of cosmetic surgery. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bröder, A., & Hohmann, N. (2003). Variations in risk taking behavior over the menstrual cycle: An improved replication. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(6), 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9(5), 291–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (2002). Human mate guarding. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23(4), 23–29.Google ScholarPubMed

Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(3), 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3(4), 251–256.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 346.Google Scholar

Butovskaya, M., Sorokowska, A., Karwowski, M., Sabiniewicz, A., Fedenok, J., Dronova, D., … & Sorokowski, P. (2017). Waist-to-hip ratio, body-mass index, age and number of children in seven traditional societies. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buunk, A. P., & Fisher, M. (2009). Individual differences in intrasexual competition. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(1), 37–48.Google Scholar

Camilleri, J. A., Quinsey, V. L., & Tapscott, J. L. (2009). Assessing the propensity for sexual coaxing and coercion in relationships: Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Tactics to Obtain Sex Scale. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(6), 959–973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, B. G. (Ed.). (1972). Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar

Cashdan, E. (1996). Women’s mating strategies. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 5(4), 134–143.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, T. (2006). Evolutionary conflicts of interest between males and females. Current Biology, 16(17), R744–R754.Google Scholar

Chavanne, T. J., & Gallup, G. G. Jr. (1998). Variation in risk taking behavior among female college students as a function of the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(1), 27–32.Google Scholar

Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 2(1), 39–55.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, T. H., Hodge, S. J., Spong, G., Russell, A. F., Jordan, N. R., Bennett, N. C., … & Manser, M. B. (2006). Intrasexual competition and sexual selection in cooperative mammals. Nature, 444(7122), 1065–1068.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Parker, G. A. (1995). Sexual coercion in animal societies. Animal Behaviour, 49(5), 1345–1365.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Davis, J. A., & Gallup, G. G. Jr. (2006). Preeclampsia and other pregnancy complications as an adaptive response to unfamiliar semen. In Platek, S. & Shackleford, T. (Eds.), Female infidelity and paternal uncertainty (pp. 191–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L., & Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 277(1692), 2405–2410.Google Scholar

DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Crawford, J. R., & Welling, L. L. (2011). Further evidence for regional variation in women’s masculinity preferences. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 278(1707), 813–814.Google Scholar

DelPriore, D. J., Bradshaw, H. K., & Hill, S. E. (2018). Appearance enhancement produces a strategic beautification penalty among women. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12(4), 348.Google Scholar

DeSteno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., Braverman, J., & Salovey, P. (2002). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1103.Google Scholar

Dixson, B. J., Duncan, M., & Dixson, A. F. (2015). The role of breast size and areolar pigmentation in perceptions of women’s sexual attractiveness, reproductive health, sexual maturity, maternal nurturing abilities, and age. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(6), 1685–1695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Ormsby, D. K., & Dixson, A. F. (2014). Eye-tracking women’s preferences for men’s somatotypes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixson, B. J., Little, A. C., Dixson, H. G., & Brooks, R. C. (2017). Do prevailing environmental factors influence human preferences for facial morphology? Behavioral Ecology, 28(5), 1217–1227.Google Scholar

Doyle, J. F., & Pazhoohi, F. (2012). Natural and augmented breasts: Is what is not natural most attractive? Human Ethology Bulletin, 27(4), 4–14.Google Scholar

Eberhard, W. G. (1985). Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Eberhard, W. (1996). Female control: Sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Edlund, J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2017). Sex differences in jealousy: A 25-year retrospective. In Olsen, J. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 55, pp. 259–302). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J., Greitemeyer, T., & Pazda, A. D. (2013). Women’s use of red clothing as a sexual signal in intersexual interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 599–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emlen, D. J. (2008). The evolution of animal weapons. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 387–413.Google Scholar

Farris, C., Treat, T. A., Viken, R. J., & McFall, R. M. (2008a). Perceptual mechanisms that characterize gender differences in decoding women’s sexual intent. Psychological Science, 19(4), 348–354.Google Scholar

Farris, C., Treat, T. A., Viken, R. J., & McFall, R. M. (2008b). Sexual coercion and the misperception of sexual intent. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(1), 48–66.Google Scholar

Fink, B., Klappauf, D., Brewer, G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2014). Female physical characteristics and intra-sexual competition in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 138–141.Google Scholar

Fink, B., & Penton-Voak, I. (2002). Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 154–158.Google Scholar

Fisher, M. L. (2004). Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271(suppl. 5), S283–S285.Google Scholar

Fisher, M. L., & Archibald, N. (2019). A thousand times more beautiful: Priming competitor derogation in women. Current Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s12144-019-00551-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, M., Cox, A., & Gordon, F. (2009). Self-promotion versus competitor derogation: The influence of sex and romantic relationship status on intrasexual competition strategy selection. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(4), 287–308.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, A. L. J., & Wong, H. Y. (1995). The evolution of self-concealed ovulation in humans. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(6), 531–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallup, G. G. Jr., & Burch, R. L. (2006). The semen displacement hypothesis: Semen hydraulics and the intra-pair copulation proclivity model of female infidelity. In Platek, S. & Shackleford, T. (Eds.), Female infidelity and paternal uncertainty (pp. 129–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galperin, A., Haselton, M. G., Frederick, D. A., Poore, J., von Hippel, W., Buss, D. M., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2013). Sexual regret: Evidence for evolved sex differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(7), 1145–1161.Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., & Scheyd, G. J. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Reviews in Anthropology, 34, 523–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–587.Google Scholar

Garver-Apgar, C. E., Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2007). Women’s perceptions of men’s sexual coerciveness change across the menstrual cycle. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(3), 536–540.Google Scholar

Garza, R., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2020). Effects of women’s short-term mating orientation and self-perceived attractiveness in rating and viewing men’s waist to chest ratios. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01846-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 55.Google Scholar

Glover, K. M., & Crowley, P. H. (2017). Female mate choice and the emergence of male coercion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71(12), 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goetz, A. T., & Shackelford, T. K. (2006). Sexual coercion and forced in-pair copulation as sperm competition tactics in humans. Human Nature, 17(3), 265–282.Google Scholar

Goetz, A. T., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). Sexual coercion in intimate relationships: A comparative analysis of the effects of women’s infidelity and men’s dominance and control. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(2), 226–234.Google Scholar

Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., & Camilleri, J. A. (2008). Proximate and ultimate explanations are required for a comprehensive understanding of partner rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(2), 119–123.Google Scholar

Grammer, K., Renninger, L., & Fischer, B. (2004). Disco clothing, female sexual motivation, and relationship status: Is she dressed to impress? Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 66–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108(3), 233.Google Scholar

Groyecka, A., Żelaźniewicz, A., Misiak, M., Karwowski, M., & Sorokowski, P. (2017). Breast shape (ptosis) as a marker of a woman’s breast attractiveness and age: Evidence from Poland and Papua. American Journal of Human Biology, 29(4), e22981.Google Scholar

Guitar, A. E., Geher, G., Kruger, D. J., Garcia, J. R., Fisher, M. L., & Fitzgerald, C. J. (2017). Defining and distinguishing sexual and emotional infidelity. Current Psychology, 36(3), 434–446.Google Scholar

Harris, C. R. (2003). Factors associated with jealousy over real and imagined infidelity: An examination of the social-cognitive and evolutionary psychology perspectives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27(4), 319–329.Google Scholar

Harris, C. R. (2013). Humans, deer, and sea dragons: How evolutionary psychology has misconstrued human sex differences. Psychological Inquiry, 24(3), 195–201.Google Scholar

Haselton, M. G. (2003). The sexual overperception bias: Evidence of a systematic bias in men from a survey of naturally occurring events. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 34–47.Google Scholar

Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81.Google Scholar

Haselton, M. G., & Galperin, A. (2013). Error management in relationships. In Simson, J. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), Handbook of close relationships (pp. 234–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Havlíček, J., Třebický, V., Valentova, J. V., Kleisner, K., Akoko, R. M., Fialová, J., … & Varella, M. A. C. (2017). Men’s preferences for women’s breast size and shape in four cultures. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(2), 217–226.Google Scholar

Hosken, D. J., & Stockley, P. (2004). Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(2), 87–93.Google Scholar

Janicke, T., Häderer, I. K., Lajeunesse, M. J., & Anthes, N. (2016). Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Science Advances, 2(2), e1500983.Google Scholar

Jasieńska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271(1545), 1213–1217.Google Scholar

Jonason, P. K., Raulston, T., & Rotolo, A. (2012). More than just a pretty face and a hot body: Multiple cues in mate-choice. Journal of Social Psychology, 152(2), 174–184.Google Scholar

Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2004). When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception, 33(5), 569–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Karastergiou, K., Smith, S. R., Greenberg, A. S., & Fried, S. K. (2012). Sex differences in human adipose tissues: The biology of pear shape. Biology of Sex Differences, 3(1), 13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Karimi-Malekabadi, F., Ghanbarian, E., Afhami, R., & Chegeni, R. (2019). Theory-driven assessment of intrasexual rivalry. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(3), 286–293.Google Scholar

Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58(1), 97–116.Google Scholar

Keys, E., & Bhogal, M. S. (2018). Mean girls: Provocative clothing leads to intra-sexual competition between females. Current Psychology, 37(3), 543–551.Google Scholar

Kočnar, T., Saribay, S. A., & Kleisner, K. (2019). Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color. PLoS One, 14(11), e0225549.Google Scholar

Kurki, H. K. (2011). Pelvic dimorphism in relation to body size and body size dimorphism in humans. Journal of Human Evolution, 61(6), 631–643.Google Scholar

La France, B. H., Henningsen, D. D., Oates, A., & Shaw, C. M. (2009). Social–sexual interactions? Meta-analyses of sex differences in perceptions of flirtatiousness, seductiveness, and promiscuousness. Communication Monographs, 76(3), 263–285.Google Scholar

Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lindgren, K. P., Parkhill, M. R., George, W. H., & Hendershot, C. S. (2008). Gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent: A qualitative review and integration. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 423–439.Google Scholar

Lippa, R. A. (2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(5), 631–651.Google Scholar

Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638–1659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marcinkowska, U. M., Kozlov, M. V., Cai, H., Contreras-Garduño, J., Dixson, B. J., Oana, G. A., … & Prasai, K. (2014). Cross-cultural variation in men’s preference for sexual dimorphism in women’s faces. Biology Letters, 10(4), 20130850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marcinkowska, U. M., Rantala, M. J., Lee, A. J., Kozlov, M. V., Aavik, T., Cai, H., … & Onyishi, I. E. (2019). Women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity are strongest under favorable ecological conditions. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–10.Google Scholar

Marlowe, F. (1998). The nubility hypothesis. Human Nature, 9(3), 263–271.Google Scholar

McCarty, K., Darwin, H., Cornelissen, P. L., Saxton, T. K., Tovée, M. J., Caplan, N., & Neave, N. (2017). Optimal asymmetry and other motion parameters that characterise high-quality female dance. Scientific Reports, 7, 42435.Google Scholar

McKibbin, W. F., Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Starratt, V. G. (2008). Why do men rape? An evolutionary psychological perspective. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 86–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNamara, J. M., Fromhage, L., Barta, Z., & Houston, A. I. (2009). The optimal coyness game. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 276(1658), 953–960.Google Scholar

Miller, G. F. (1998). How mate choice shaped human nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution. In Crawford, C. & Krebs, D. L. (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 87–129). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Moore, F. R., Coetzee, V., Contreras-Garduño, J., DeBruine, L. M., Kleisner, K., Krams, I., … & Schaum, N. (2013). Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for cues to sex-and stress-hormones in the male face. Biology Letters, 9(3), 20130050.Google Scholar

Morris, P. H., White, J., Morrison, E. R., & Fisher, K. (2013). High heels as supernormal stimuli: How wearing high heels affects judgements of female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 176–181.Google Scholar

Mueller, U., & Mazur, A. (2001). Evidence of unconstrained directional selection for male tallness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50(4), 302–311.Google Scholar

Muller, M. N., & Wrangham, R. W. (Eds.). (2009). Sexual coercion in primates and humans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nettle, D. (2002a). Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Human Nature, 13(4), 473–491.Google Scholar

Nettle, D. (2002b). Women’s height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1503), 1919–1923.Google Scholar

Okami, P., & Shackelford, T. K. (2001). Human sex differences in sexual psychology and behavior. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12(1), 186–241.Google Scholar

Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 29.Google Scholar

Parker, G. A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews, 45, 525–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, G. A. (2006). Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: An overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361(1466), 235–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pawłowski, B. (1999). Loss of oestrus and concealed ovulation in human evolution: The case against the sexual-selection hypothesis. Current Anthropology, 40(3), 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pawłowski, B., Dunbar, R. I., & Lipowicz, A. (2000). Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature, 403(6766), 156.Google Scholar

Pazhoohi, F. (2011). Waist-to-hip ratio, attractiveness and gender discrimination. Gender and Behaviour, 9(1), 3580–3591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pazhoohi, F. (2017). Polygyny as a strategy for controlling male sexuality to secure child survival. Human Ethology Bulletin, 32(2), 24–35.Google Scholar

Pazhoohi, F., Arantes, J., Kingstone, A., & Pinal, D. (2020a). Becoming sexy: Contrapposto pose increases attractiveness ratings and modulates observers’ brain activity. Biological Psychology, 151, 107842.Google Scholar

Pazhoohi, F., Arantes, J., Kingstone, A., & Pinal, D. (2020b). Waist to hip ratio and breast size modulate the processing of female body silhouettes: An EEG study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(2), 150–169.Google Scholar

Pazhoohi, F., Doyle, J. F., Macedo, A. F., & Arantes, J. (2018). Arching the back (lumbar curvature) as a female sexual proceptivity signal: An eye-tracking study. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4(2), 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pazhoohi, F., Garza, R., Doyle, J. F., Macedo, A. F., & Arantes, J. (2019a). Sex differences for preferences of shoulder to hip ratio in men and women: An eye tracking study. Evolutionary Psychological Sciences, 5, 405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pazhoohi, F., Grammer, K., Macedo, A. F., & Arantes, J. (2020c). The effect of women’s leg posture on gazing behavior and perceived attractiveness. Current Psychology, 39(3), 1049–1054.Google Scholar

Pazhoohi, F., & Kingstone, A. (2020a). Parasite prevalence and income inequality positively predict beardedness across 25 countries. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 6, 185–193.Google Scholar

Pazhoohi, F., & Kingstone, A. (2020b). Sex difference on the importance of veiling: A cross-cultural investigation. Cross-Cultural Research, 54(5), 486–501.Google Scholar

Pazhoohi, F., Lang, M., Xygalatas, D., & Grammer, K. (2017). Religious veiling as a mate-guarding strategy: Effects of environmental pressures on cultural practices. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(2), 118–124.Google Scholar

Pazhoohi, F., & Liddle, J. R. (2012). Identifying feminine and masculine ranges for waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6(2), 227.Google Scholar

Pazhoohi, F., Macedo, A. F., Doyle, J. F., & Arantes, J. (2020d). Waist-to-hip ratio as supernormal stimuli: Effect of contrapposto pose and viewing angle. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(3), 837–847.Google Scholar

Pazhoohi, F., Silva, C., Lamas, J., Mouta, S., Santos, J., & Arantes, J. (2019b). The effect of height and shoulder-to-hip ratio on interpersonal space in virtual environment. Psychological Research, 83(6), 1184–1193.Google Scholar

Pazhoohi, F., Silva, C., Pereira, L., Oliveira, M., Santana, P., Rodrigues, R., & Arantes, J. (2019c). Is imagination of the infidelity more painful than actual infidelity? Current Psychology, 38(2), 572–578.Google Scholar

Peplau, L. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(2), 37–40.Google Scholar

Perilloux, C., Easton, J. A., & Buss, D. M. (2012). The misperception of sexual interest. Psychological Science, 23(2), 146–151.Google Scholar

Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 21.Google Scholar

Petralia, S. M., & Gallup, G. G. Jr. (2002). Effects of a sexual assault scenario on handgrip strength across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(1), 3–10.Google Scholar

Pham, M. N., DeLecce, T., & Shackelford, T. K. (2017). Sperm competition in marriage: Semen displacement, male rivals, and spousal discrepancy in sexual interest. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 229–232.Google Scholar

Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2013). The relationship between objective sperm competition risk and men’s copulatory interest is moderated by partner’s time spent with other men. Human Nature, 24(4), 476–485.Google Scholar

Pisanski, K., & Feinberg, D. R. (2013). Cross-cultural variation in mate preferences for averageness, symmetry, body size, and masculinity. Cross-Cultural Research, 47(2), 162–197.Google Scholar

Platek, S. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.). (2006). Female infidelity and paternal uncertainty: Evolutionary perspectives on male anti-cuckoldry tactics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Prokop, P. (2020). High heels enhance perceived sexual attractiveness, leg length and women’s mate-guarding. Current Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00832-yGoogle Scholar

Prokop, P., & Švancárová, J. (2020). Wearing high heels as female mating strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109558.Google Scholar

Pulit, S. L., Karaderi, T., & Lindgren, C. M. (2017). Sexual dimorphisms in genetic loci linked to body fat distribution. Bioscience Reports, 37(1), BSR20160184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 157–175.Google Scholar

Puts, D. A., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2012). Sexual selection on human faces and voices. Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 227–243.Google Scholar

Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. W., & Peters, M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(2), 186–201.Google Scholar

Röder, S., Carbon, C. C., Shackelford, T. K., Pisanski, K., Weege, B., & Fink, B. (2016). Men’s visual attention to and perceptions of women’s dance movements. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 1–3.Google Scholar

Ruff, C. (2002). Variation in human body size and shape. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31(1), 211–232.Google Scholar

Sagarin, B. J., Becker, D. V., Guadagno, R. E., Nicastle, L. D., & Millevoi, A. (2003). Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy: The moderating influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(1), 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, D. P. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85.Google Scholar

Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(2), 247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: Sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1185.Google Scholar

Scott, I. M., Clark, A. P., Josephson, S. C., Boyette, A. H., Cuthill, I. C., Fried, R. L., … & Honey, P. L. (2014). Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(40), 14388–14393.Google Scholar

Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 276(1656), 575–584.Google Scholar

Sell, A., Lukazsweski, A. W., & Townsley, M. (2017). Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men’s bodily attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 284(1869), 20171819.Google Scholar

Shackelford, T. K. (2002). Are young women the special targets of rape‐murder? Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 28(3), 224–232.Google Scholar

Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2004). Men’s sexual coercion in intimate relationships: Development and initial validation of the Sexual Coercion in Intimate Relationships Scale. Violence and Victims, 19(5), 541–556.Google Scholar

Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2007). Adaptation to sperm competition in humans. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(1), 47–50.Google Scholar

Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of sexual conflict in humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., McKibbin, W. F., & Starratt, V. G. (2007). Absence makes the adaptations grow fonder: Proportion of time apart from partner, male sexual psychology, and sperm competition in humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121(2), 214.Google Scholar

Shackelford, T. K., LeBlanc, G. J., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Bleske-Rechek, A. L., Euler, H. A., & Hoier, S. (2002). Psychological adaptation to human sperm competition. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(2), 123–138.Google Scholar

Shotland, R. L., & Craig, J. M. (1988). Can men and women differentiate between friendly and sexually interested behavior? Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 66–73.Google Scholar

Sillén-Tullberg, B., & Moller, A. P. (1993). The relationship between concealed ovulation and mating systems in anthropoid primates: A phylogenetic analysis. The American Naturalist, 141(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 870.Google Scholar

Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307.Google Scholar

Singh, D., & Randall, P. K. (2007). Beauty is in the eye of the plastic surgeon: Waist–hip ratio (WHR) and women’s attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(2), 329–340.Google Scholar

Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(6), 483–507.Google Scholar

Smuts, B. B., & Smuts, R. W. (1993). Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: Evidence and theoretical implications. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 22(22), 1–63.Google Scholar

Strassmann, B. I. (1981). Sexual selection, paternal care, and concealed ovulation in humans. Ethology and Sociobiology, 2(1), 31–40.Google Scholar

Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., & Pollet, T. V. (2013). Women want taller men more than men want shorter women. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(8), 877–883.Google Scholar

Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., Verhulst, S., & Pollet, T. V. (2015). Human height is positively related to interpersonal dominance in dyadic interactions. PLoS One, 10(2), e0117860.Google Scholar

Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In Abramson, P. R. & Pinkerton, S. D. (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–119). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2001). A natural history of rape: Biological bases of sexual coercion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Thornhill, N. W., & Thornhill, R. (1990a). An evolutionary analysis of psychological pain following rape: I. The effects of victim’s age and marital status. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11(3), 155–176.Google Scholar

Thornhill, N. W., & Thornhill, R. (1990b). An evolutionary analysis of psychological pain following rape: II. The effects of stranger, friend, and family-member offenders. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11(3), 177–193.Google Scholar

Thornhill, N. W., & Thornhill, R. (1990c). An evolutionary analysis of psychological pain following rape. III: Effects of force and violence. Aggressive Behavior, 16(5), 297–320.Google Scholar

Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. W. (1992). The evolutionary psychology of men’s coercive sexuality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(2), 363–375.Google Scholar

Tooke, W., & Camire, L. (1991). Patterns of deception in intersexual and intrasexual mating strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12(5), 345–364.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. L. (2002). Parental investment and reproductive success. In Natural selection and social theory: Selected papers of Robert Trivers (pp. 56–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Turke, P. W. (1984). Effects of ovulatory concealment and synchrony on protohominid mating systems and parental roles. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5(1), 33–44.Google Scholar

Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1631), 20130080.Google Scholar

Wachtmeister, C. A., & Enquist, M. (1999). The evolution of female coyness: Trading time for information. Ethology, 105(11), 983–992.Google Scholar

Wachtmeister, C. A., & Enquist, M. (2000). The evolution of courtship rituals in monogamous species. Behavioral Ecology, 11(4), 405–410.Google Scholar

Walter, K. V., Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Asao, K., Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., … & Amjad, N. (2020). Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: A large-scale replication. Psychological Science, 31(4), 408–423.Google Scholar

Walters, S., & Crawford, C. B. (1994). The importance of mate attraction for intrasexual competition in men and women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(1), 5–30.Google Scholar

Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Toobey, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 289–322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Woodward, K., & Richards, M. H. (2005). The parental investment model and minimum mate choice criteria in humans. Behavioral Ecology, 16(1), 57–61.Google Scholar

Zaadstra, B. M., Seidell, J. C., Van Noord, P. A., te Velde, E. R., Habbema, J. D., Vrieswijk, B., & Karbaat, J. (1993). Fat and female fecundity: Prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. BMJ, 306, 484–487.Google Scholar

Żelaźniewicz, A., & Pawłowski, B. (2019). Maternal breast volume in pregnancy and lactation capacity. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 168(1), 180–189.Google Scholar

Alcock, J., Maley, C. C., & Aktipis, C. A. (2014). Is eating behavior manipulated by the gastrointestinal microbiota? Evolutionary pressures and potential mechanisms. BioEssays, 36, 940–949.Google Scholar

Allen-Blevins, C. R., Sela, D. A., & Hinde, K. (2015). Milk bioactives may manipulate microbes to mediate parent–offspring conflict. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health, 2015, 106–121.Google Scholar

Anderson, K. G., Kaplan, H., & Lancaster, J. (1999). Paternal care by genetic fathers and stepfathers I: Reports from Albuquerque men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(6), 405–431.Google Scholar

Apostolou, M. (2007a). Sexual selection under parental choice: The role of parents in the evolution of human mating. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(6), 403–409.Google Scholar

Apostolou, M. (2007b). Elements of parental choice: The evolution of parental preferences in relation to in-law selection. Evolutionary Psychology, 5(1), 70–83.Google Scholar

Apostolou, M. (2008a). Parent–offspring conflict over mating: The case of family background. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(3), 456–468.Google Scholar

Apostolou, M. (2008b). Parent–offspring conflict over mating: The case of beauty. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(2), 303–315.Google Scholar

Apostolou, M. (2009). Parent–offspring conflict over mating: The case of short-term mating strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 895–899.Google Scholar

Apostolou, M. (2010). Parent–offspring conflict over mating: The case of mating age. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(3), 365–375.Google Scholar

Apostolou, M. (2011a). Parent–offspring conflict over mating: Testing the tradeoffs hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychology, 9(4), 470–495.Google Scholar

Apostolou, M. (2011b). Parent–offspring conflict over mating: A replication and extension study. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 2(1), 13–26.Google Scholar

Apostolou, M. (2017). The nature of parent–offspring conflict over mating: From differences in genetic relatedness to disagreement over mate choice. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(1), 62–71.Google Scholar

Apostolou, M., Chari, I., Lefkides, C., Theophanous, I., & Khalil, M. (2016). Parent–offspring conflict over mating: The case of divorce. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 286–294.Google Scholar

Apostolou, M., & Papageorgi, I. (2014). Parental mate choice manipulation tactics: Exploring prevalence, sex and personality effects. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 588–620.Google Scholar

Ball, H. (2008). Evolutionary paediatrics: A case study in applying Darwinian medicine. In Elton, S. & O’Higgins, P. (Eds.), Medicine and evolution: Current applications, future prospects (pp. 127–152). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Barrett, L., Halliday, J., & Henzi, S. P. (2006). The ecology of motherhood: The structuring of lactation costs by chacma baboons. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 875–886.Google Scholar

Barrett, L., & Henzi, S. P. (2000). Are baboon infants Sir Phillip Sydney’s offspring? Ethology, 106, 645–658.Google Scholar

Bartoš, L., Bartošová, J., Pluháček, J., & Olléová, M. (2012). Effect of ecological adaptation on suckling behaviour in three zebra species. Behaviour, 149, 1395–1411.Google Scholar

Bovet, J., Raiber, E., Ren, W., Wang, C., & Seabright, P. (2018). Parent–offspring conflict over mate choice: An experimental study in China. British Journal of Psychology, 109(4), 674–693.Google Scholar

Brown, W. M., & Consedine, N. S. (2004). Just how happy is the happy puppet? An emotion signaling and kinship theory perspective on the behavioral phenotype of children with Angelman syndrome. Medical Hypotheses, 63(3), 377–385.Google Scholar

Bugos, P. E., & McCarthy, L. M. (1984). Ayoreo infanticide: A case study. In Hausfater, G. & Hrdy, S. B. (Eds.), Infanticide: Comparative and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 503–520). New York, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204.Google Scholar

Buunk, A. P., Park, J. H., & Dubbs, S. L. (2008). Parent–offspring conflict in mate preferences. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 47–62.Google Scholar

Buunk, A. P., & Solano, A. C. (2010). Conflicting preferences of parents and offspring over criteria for a mate: A study in Argentina. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(4), 391.Google Scholar

Caro, S. M., Griffin, A. S., Hinde, C. A., & West, S. A. (2016). Unpredictable environments lead to the evolution of parental neglect in birds. Nature Communications, 7, 1–10.Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2002). Variation in homicide risk during infancy: United States, 1989–1998. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 51, 187–189.Google Scholar

Cowlishaw, G. (1978). Infanticide in aboriginal Australia. Oceania, 48, 262–283.Google Scholar

Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar

Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1999). The truth about Cinderella: A Darwinian view of parental love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Duijts, L., Ramadhani, M. K., & Moll, H. A. (2009). Breastfeeding protects against infectious diseases during infancy in industrialized countries: A systematic review. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 5, 199–210.Google Scholar

Euler, H. A. (2011). Grandparents and extended kin. In Salmon, C. A. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (pp. 181–210). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fowden, A. L., & Moore, T. (2012). Maternal–fetal resource allocation: Co-operation and conflict. Placenta, 33, e11–e15.Google Scholar

Fox, R. (1967). Kinship and marriage: An anthropological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, S. H., Horwitz, S. M., & Resnick, P. J. (2005). Child murder by mothers: A critical analysis of the current state of knowledge and a research agenda. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(9), 1578–1587.Google Scholar

Haig, D. (1993). Maternal–fetal conflict in human pregnancy. Quarterly Review of Biology, 68, 495–532.Google Scholar

Haig, D. (2010). Transfers and transitions: Parent–offspring conflict, genomic imprinting, and the evolution of human life history. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 (suppl. 1), 1731–1735.Google Scholar

Haig, D. (2014). Troubled sleep: Night waking, breastfeeding and parent–offspring conflict. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health, 2014(1), 32–39.Google Scholar

Haig, D., & Wharton, R. (2003). Prader‐Willi syndrome and the evolution of human childhood. American Journal of Human Biology, 15(3), 320–329.Google Scholar

Hart, S. L. (2016). Jealousy protest: Ontogeny in accord with the 9-month period of human gestation. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(2), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herman-Giddens, M. E., Smith, J. B., Mittal, M., Carlson, M., and Butts, J. D. (2003). Newborns killed or left to die by a parent: A population-based study. JAMA, 289(11), 1425–1429.Google Scholar

Hinde, K., & German, J. B. (2012). Food in an evolutionary context: Insights from mother’s milk. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 92(11), 2219–2223.Google Scholar

Hinde, K., Skibiel, A. L., Foster, A. B., Del Rosso, L., Mendeoza, S. P., & Capitanio, J. P. (2015). Cortisol in mother’s milk across lactation reflects maternal life history and predicts infant temperament. Behavioral Ecology, 26(1), 269–281.Google Scholar

Jasienska, G. (2009). Reproduction and lifespan: Trade-offs, overall energy budgets, intergenerational costs, and costs neglected by research. American Journal of Human Biology, 21, 524–532.Google Scholar

Kotler, J. (2016). Weaning and maternal–fetal conflict. In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Maestripieri, D. (2002). Parent–offspring conflict in primates. International Journal of Primatology, 23, 923–951.Google Scholar

Maestripieri, D. (2004). Genetic aspects of mother–offspring conflict in rhesus macaques. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55, 381–387.Google Scholar

Masciuch, S., & Kienapple, K. (1993). The emergency of jealousy in children 4 months to 7 years of age. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 421–435.Google Scholar

McDade, T. W. (2001). Parent–offspring conflict and the cultural ecology of breast-feeding. Human Nature, 12(1), 9–25.Google Scholar

McKerracher, L. J., Collard, M., Altman, R. M., Sellen, D., & Nepomnaschy, P. A. (2016). Energy-related influences on variation in breastfeeding duration among indigenous Maya women from Guatemala. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 162, 616–626.Google Scholar

Mehr, S. A., & Krasnow, M. M. (2017). Parent–offspring conflict and the evolution of infant-directed song. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 674–684.Google Scholar

Mock, D. W., Drummond, H., & Stinson, C. H. (1990). Avian siblicide. American Scientist, 78(5), 438–449.Google Scholar

Mock, D. W., & Parker, G. A. (1997). The evolution of sibling rivalry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morandini, V., & Ferrer, M. (2015). Sibling aggression and brood reduction: A review. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 27, 2–16.Google Scholar

Mull, D. S., & Mull, J. D. (1987). Infanticide among the Tarahumara of the Mexican Sierra Madre. In Scheper-Hughes, N. (Ed.), Child survival: Anthropological perspectives on the treatment and maltreatment of children (pp. 113–132). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar

Newburg, D. S., Ruiz-Palacios, G. M., Altaye, M., Chaturvedi, P., Meinzen-Derr, J., Guerrero, M. D. L., & Morrow, A. L. (2004). Innate protection conferred by fucosylated oligosaccharides of human milk against diarrhea in breastfed infants. Glycobiology, 14(3), 253–263.Google Scholar

Niemeyer, C. L., & Anderson, J. R. (1983). Primate harassment of matings. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 205–220.Google Scholar

Overpeck, M. D., Brenner, R. A., Trumble, A. C., Trifiletti, L. B., & Berendes, H. W. (1998). Risk factors for infant homicide in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(17), 1211–1216.Google Scholar

Packard, J. M., Mech, L. D., & Ream, R. R. (1992). Weaning in an arctic wolf pack: Behavioral mechanisms. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 70(7), 1269–1275.Google Scholar

Paul, M., & Bhadra, A. (2017). Selfish pups: Weaning conflict and milk theft in free-ranging dogs. PLoS One, 12(2), e0170590.Google Scholar

Paul, M., Majumder, S. S., & Bhadra, A. (2014). Selfish mothers? An empirical test of parent–offspring conflict over extended parental care. Behavioural Processes, 103, 17–22.Google Scholar

Pavé, R., Kowalewski, M. M., Peker, S. M., & Zunino, G. E. (2010). Preliminary study of mother–offspring conflict in black and gold howler monkeys (Alouatta caraya). Primates, 51(3), 221–226.Google Scholar

Pavé, R., Kowalewski, M. M., Zunino, G. E., & Giraudo, A. R. (2015). How do demographic and social factors influence parent–offspring conflict? The case of wild black and gold howler monkeys (Alouatta caraya). American Journal of Primatology, 77(8), 911–923.Google Scholar

Perilloux, C., Fleischman, D. S., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Meet the parents: Parent–offspring convergence and divergence in mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 253–258.Google Scholar

Pluháček, J., Bartoš, L., & Bartošová, J. (2010). Mother–offspring conflict in captive plains zebra (Equus burchellii): Suckling bout duration. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 122, 127–132.Google Scholar

Rehling, A., Spiller, I., Krause, E. T., Nager, R. G., Monaghan, P., & Trillmich, F. (2012). Flexibility in the duration of parental care: Zebra finch parents respond to offspring needs. Animal Behaviour, 83, 35–39.Google Scholar

Reik, T. (2002). Love and lust: On the psychoanalysis of romantic and sexual emotions. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Rohwer, S., Herron, J. C., & Daly, M. (1999). Stepparental behavior as mating effort in birds and other animals. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(6), 367–390.Google Scholar

Salmon, C. A. (1999). On the impact of the sex and birth order on contact with kin. Human Nature, 10, 183–197.Google Scholar

Salmon, C. (2015). Parental investment and parent–offspring conflict. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 542–560). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Salmon, C. A., & Hehman, J. A. (2022). Evolutionary perspectives on infant–mother conflict. In Hart, S. L. & Bjorklund, D. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on infancy. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Schlomer, G. L., Del Giudice, M., & Ellis, B. J. (2011). Parent–offspring conflict theory: An evolutionary framework for understanding conflict within human families. Psychological Review, 118, 496–521.Google Scholar

Schlomer, G. L., Ellis, B. J., & Garber, J. (2010). Mother–child conflict and sibling relatedness: A test of hypotheses from parent–offspring conflict theory. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 287–306.Google Scholar

Schmitt, D. P. (2015). Fundamentals of human mating strategies. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 258–291). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Sellen, D. W. (2001). Comparison of infant feeding patterns reported for nonindustrial populations with current recommendations. Journal of Nutrition, 131(10), 2707–2715.Google Scholar

Sellen, D. W. (2009). Evolution of human lactation and complementary feeding: Implications for understanding contemporary cross-cultural variation. In Breast-feeding: Early influences on later health (pp. 253–282). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Smorti, M., Tschiesner, R., & Farneti, A. 2012. Grandparents–grandchildren relationship. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 895–898.Google Scholar

Trehub, S. E., Unyk, A. M., & Henderson, J. L. (1994). Children’s songs to infant siblings: Parallels with speech. Journal of Child Language, 21, 735–744.Google Scholar

Trehub, S. E., Unyk, A. M., & Trainor, L. J. (1993a). Adults identify infant-directed music across cultures. Infant Behavior and Development, 16, 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trehub, S. E., Unyk, A. M., & Trainor, L. J. (1993b). Maternal singing in cross-cultural perspective. Infant Behavior and Development, 16, 285–295.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. G. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1887–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent–offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249–264.Google Scholar

Tully, K. P., & Ball, H. L. (2013). Trade-offs underlying maternal breastfeeding decisions: A conceptual model. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 9, 90–98.Google Scholar

van den Berg, P., Fawcett, T. W., Buunk, A. P., & Weissing, F. J. (2013). The evolution of parent–offspring conflict over mate choice. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 405–411.Google Scholar

van Noordwijk, M. A., Kuzawa, C. W., & van Schaik, C. P. (2013). The evolution of the patterning of human lactation: A comparative perspective. Evolutionary Anthropology, 22, 202–212.Google Scholar

Veile, A., & Miller, V. (2019). Duration of breast feeding in ancestral environments. In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Wells, J. C. (2003). Parent–offspring conflict theory, signaling of need, and weight gain in early life. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 78, 169–202.Google Scholar

Winberg, J. (2005). Mother and newborn baby: Mutual regulation of physiology and behavior – a selective review. Developmental Psychology, 47, 217–229.Google Scholar

Axelrod, R. The evolution of cooperation (revised edition). New York, NY: Basic Books, 2006.Google Scholar

Bainbridge, W. S. (2007). The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science, 317(5837), 472–476.Google Scholar

Barkow, J., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1995). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brandt, H., Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y., & Sigmund, K. (2007). A survey of indirect reciprocity. In Takeuchi, Y., Iwasa, Y., & Sato, K. (Eds.), Mathematics for ecology and environmental sciences (pp. 21–49). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Cassar, A. (2007). Coordination and cooperation in local, random and small world networks: Experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior, 58(2), 209–230.Google Scholar

Castronova, E. (2006). On the research value of large games: Natural experiments in Norrath and Camelot. Games and Culture, 1(2), 163–186.Google Scholar

Dal Bó, P., & Fréchette, G. R. (2011). The evolution of cooperation in infinitely repeated games: Experimental evidence. American Economic Review, 101(1), 411–429.Google Scholar

Duffy, J., & Ochs, J. (2009). Cooperative behavior and the frequency of social interaction. Games and Economic Behavior, 66(2), 785–812.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100–110.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (2018). The anatomy of friendship. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 32–51.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1987). Cheap talk, coordination, and entry. The RAND Journal of Economics, 18(1), 34–39.Google Scholar

Fehl, K., van der Post, D. J., & Semmann, D. (2011). Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation. Ecology Letters, 14(6), 546–551.Google Scholar

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(23), 785–791.Google Scholar

Fudenberg, D., Rand, D. G., & Dreber, A. (2012). Slow to anger and fast to forgive: Cooperation in an uncertain world. American Economic Review, 102, 720–749.Google Scholar

Gächter, S., Kessler-Esther, E., and Königstein, M. (2010). Do incentives destroy voluntary cooperation? Working Paper.Google Scholar

Grujić, J., Fosco, C., Araujo, L., Cuesta, J., & Sánchez, A. (2010). Social experiments in the mesoscale: Humans playing a spatial prisoner’s dilemma. PLoS One, 5(11), e13749.Google Scholar

Grujić, J., Röhl, T., Semmann, D., Milinski, M., & Traulsen, A. (2012). Consistent strategy updating in spatial and non-spatial behavioral experiments does not promote cooperation in social networks. PLoS One, 7(11), e47718.Google Scholar

Ichinose, G., & Arita, T. (2008). The role of migration and founder effect for the evolution of cooperation in a multilevel selection context. Ecological Modelling, 210(3), 221–230.Google Scholar

Keser, C., and Van Winden, F. (2000). Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102(1), 23–39.Google Scholar

Leimar, O., & Hammerstein, P. (2001). Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268(1468), 745–753.Google Scholar

Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153–174.Google Scholar

Lindgren, K. (1991). Evolutionary phenomena in simple dynamics. In Artificial Life II Conference (pp. 295–312).Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, J. (1994). Must reliable signals always be costly? Animal Behaviour, 47(5), 1115–1120.Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, J., & Szathmáry, E. (2000). The origins of life: From the birth of life to the origin of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Milinski, M., Semmann, D., Bakker, T. C. M., & Krambeck, H.-J. (2001). Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: Image scoring or standing strategy? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268(1484), 2495–2501.Google Scholar

Milinski, M., Semmann, D., & Krambeck, H. J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the “tragedy of the commons”. Nature, 415(6870), 424–426.Google Scholar

Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314(5805), 1560–1563.Google Scholar

Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1993). A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Nature, 364(6432), 56–58.Google Scholar

Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998a). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393(6685), 573–577.Google Scholar

Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998b). The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 194(4), 561–574.Google Scholar

Ohtsuki, H., Hauert, C., Lieberman, E., & Nowak, M. A. (2006). A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature, 441(7092), 502–505.Google Scholar

Ohtsuki, H., & Iwasa, Y. (2004). How should we define goodness? Reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 231(1), 107–120.Google Scholar

Ohtsuki, H., and Iwasa, Y. (2006). The leading eight: Social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 239(4), 435–444.Google Scholar

Pacheco, J. M., Santos, F. C., & Chalub, F. A. C. C. (2006). Sternjudging: A simple, successful norm which promotes cooperation under indirect reciprocity. PLoS Computational Biology, 2(12), e178.Google Scholar

Panchanathan, K., & Boyd, R. (2003). A tale of two defectors: The importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 224(1), 115–126.Google Scholar

Pepper, J. W. (2007). Simple models of assortment through environmental feedback. Artificial Life, 13(1), 1–9.Google Scholar

Pepper, J. W., & Smuts, B. B. (2002). A mechanism for the evolution of altruism among nonkin: Positive assortment through environmental feedback. The American Naturalist, 160(2), 205–213.Google Scholar

Perc, M., & Szolnoki, A. (2010). Coevolutionary games: A mini review. BioSystems, 99(2), 109–125.Google Scholar

Rand, D. G., Arbesman, S., & Christakis, N. (2011). Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(48), 19193–19198.Google Scholar

Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013). Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 413–425.Google Scholar

Santos, F., Pacheco, J., and Lenaerts, T. (2006). Cooperation prevails when individuals adjust their social ties. PLoS Computational Biology, 2(10), e140.Google Scholar

Suri, S., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments. PLoS One, 6(3), e16836.Google Scholar

Szell, M., Sinatra, R., Petri, G., Thurner, S., & Latora, V. (2012). Understanding mobility in a social petri dish. Scientific Reports, 2, 457.Google Scholar

Szell, M., & Thurner, S. (2010). Measuring social dynamics in a massive multiplayer online game. Social Networks, 32(4), 313–329.Google Scholar

Szell, M., & Thurner, S. (2013). How women organize social networks different from men. Scientific Reports, 3, 1214.Google Scholar

Takano, M., Wada, K., & Fukuda, I. (2015). Environmentally driven migration in a social network game. Scientific Reports, 5, 12481.Google Scholar

Takano, M., Wada, K., & Fukuda, I. (2016a). Lightweight interactions for reciprocal cooperation in a social network game. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Informatics (SocInfo) (pp. 125–137).Google Scholar

Takano, M., Wada, K., & Fukuda, I. (2016b). Reciprocal altruism-based cooperation in a social network game. New Generation Computing, 34(3), 257–271.Google Scholar

Tanimoto, J., & Sagara, H. (2007). Relationship between dilemma occurrence and the existence of a weakly dominant strategy in a two-player symmetric game. BioSystems, 90(1), 105–114.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–37.Google Scholar

Wang, J., Suri, S., & Watts, D. J. (2012). Cooperation and assortativity with dynamic partner updating. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(36), 14363–14368.Google Scholar

Watts, D. J. (2011). Everything is obvious*: *Once you know the answer. New York, NY: Crown Business.Google Scholar

Wedekind, C., & Milinski, M. (2000). Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science, 288(5467), 850–852.Google Scholar

Banai, B., & Pavela, I. (2015). Two-dimensional structure of the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory and its personality correlates. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(3), 1–7.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, A. (2016a). Governing behavior: How nerve cell dictatorships and democracies control everything we do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, A. (2016b). Is your nervous system a democracy or a dictatorship when controlling your behavior? The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/is-your-nervous-system-a-democracy-or-a-dictatorship-when-controlling-your-behavior-61888Google Scholar

Bielby, J., Mace, G. M., Bininda-Emonds, O. R., Cardillo, M., Gittleman, J. L., Jones, K. E., … & Purvis, A. (2007). The fast–slow continuum in mammalian life history: An empirical reevaluation. The American Naturalist, 169(6), 748–757.Google Scholar

Brumbach, B. H., Figueredo, A. J., & Ellis, B. J. (2009). Effects of harsh and unpredictable environments in adolescence on development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20(1), 25–51.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, T. (2016). Mammal societies. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copping, L. T., Campbell, A., & Muncer, S. (2014). Psychometrics and life history strategy: The structure and validity of the high K strategy scale. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1), 200–222.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-F.FI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Johnson, W., & Houlihan, L. M. (2009). Genetic foundations of human intelligence. Human Genetics, 126(1), 215–232.Google Scholar

Deary, I .J., Lawn, M., & Bartholomew, D. J. (2008). A conversation between Charles Spearman, Godfrey Thomson, and Edward L. Thorndike: The International Examinations Inquiry Meetings 1931–1938. History of Psychology, 11(3), 163.Google Scholar

Del Giudice, M. (2014). An evolutionary life history framework for psychopathology. Psychological Inquiry, 25(3–4), 261–300.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar

Fernandes, H. B. F., Woodley, M. A., Hutz, C. S., & Figueredo, A. J. (2016). The strength of associations among sexual strategy traits: Variations as a function of life history speed. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 275–283.Google Scholar

Fernandes, H. B. F., Woodley, M. A., Hutz, C. S., & Kruger, D. J. (2013). Strategic differentiation-integration effort in the context of sexual strategies: A cross-national perspective. Oral presentation, Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Miami, FL.Google Scholar

Figueredo, A. J. (2007). The Arizona Life History Battery. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/email.arizona.edu/ajf/the-arizona-life-history-battery-alhbGoogle Scholar

Figueredo, A. J., Cabeza de Baca, T., Garcia, R. A., Gable, J. C., & Weise, D. (2013). Revisiting mediation in the social and behavioral sciences. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 4(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Figueredo, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. M., Kauffman, I. A., Weil, E., & Gladden, P. R. (2012). The interplay of behavioral dispositions and cognitive abilities: Sociosexual orientation, emotional intelligence, executive functions, and life history strategy. Temas em Psicologia, 20(1), 81–100.Google Scholar

Figueredo, A. J., Gladden, P. R., Sisco, M. M., Patch, E. A., & Jones, D. N. (2015). The unholy trinity: The Dark Triad, sexual coercion, and Brunswik-Symmetry. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(2), 435–454.Google Scholar

Figueredo, A. J., Jacobs, W. J., Gladden, P. R., Bianchi, J., Patch, E. A., Beck, C. J. A., … & Li, N. P. (2018). Intimate partner violence, interpersonal aggression, and life history strategy. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12(1), 1–31.Google Scholar

Figueredo, A. J., & Rushton, J. P. (2009). Evidence for shared genetic dominance between the general factor of personality, mental and physical health, and life history traits. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12(6), 555–563.Google Scholar

Figueredo, A. J., & Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M. (2021). The moderating influence of the general life history strategy factor upon the relation between short-term and long-term mating orientations is mediated by a strategic differentiation-integration factor. Academia Letters, 2, 3433.Google Scholar

Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., & Schneider, S. M. R. (2004). The heritability of life history strategy: The K-factor, covitality, and personality. Social Biology, 51, 121–143.Google Scholar

Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., & Schneider, S. M. R. (2007). The K-factor, covitality, and personality: A psychometric test of life history theory. Human Nature, 18(1), 47–73.Google Scholar

Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Sefcek, J. A., Kirsner, B. R., & Jacobs, W. J. (2005). The K-Factor: Individual differences in life history strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(8), 1349–1360.Google Scholar

Figueredo, A. J., Woodley, M. A., Brown, S. D., & Ross, K. C. (2013). Multiple successful tests of the strategic differentiation-integration effort (SD-IE) hypothesis. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7(4), 361–383.Google Scholar

Figueredo, A. J., Woodley of Menie, M. A., & Jacobs, W. J. (2015). The evolutionary psychology of the General Factor of Personality: A hierarchical life history model. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology, 2nd ed. (pp. 943–967). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58, 69–96.Google Scholar

Garcia, R. A., Cabeza de Baca, T., Black, C. J., Sotomayor-Peterson, M., Smith-Castro, V., & Figueredo, A. J. (2016). Measures of domain-specific resource allocations in life history strategy: Indicators of a latent common factor or ordered developmental sequence? Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 7(1), 23–51.Google Scholar