Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I The Comparative Approach
- Part II Sociocultural Anthropology and Evolution
- Part III Evolution and Neuroscience
- Part IV Group Living
- Part V Evolution and Cognition
- Part VI Evolution and Development
- Part VII Sexual Selection and Human Sex Differences
- 26 Survival, Selection, and Sex Differences in Fear
- 27 The Enigmatic Urge
- 28 Are Humans Peacocks or Robins?
- 29 Human Mate Selection
- 30 Kin Selection and the Evolution of Male Androphilia
- 31 Evolutionary Psychology
- Part VIII Abnormal Behavior and Evolutionary Psychopathology
- Part IX Applying Evolutionary Principles
- Part X Evolution and the Media
- Index
- References
26 - Survival, Selection, and Sex Differences in Fear
from Part VII - Sexual Selection and Human Sex Differences
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I The Comparative Approach
- Part II Sociocultural Anthropology and Evolution
- Part III Evolution and Neuroscience
- Part IV Group Living
- Part V Evolution and Cognition
- Part VI Evolution and Development
- Part VII Sexual Selection and Human Sex Differences
- 26 Survival, Selection, and Sex Differences in Fear
- 27 The Enigmatic Urge
- 28 Are Humans Peacocks or Robins?
- 29 Human Mate Selection
- 30 Kin Selection and the Evolution of Male Androphilia
- 31 Evolutionary Psychology
- Part VIII Abnormal Behavior and Evolutionary Psychopathology
- Part IX Applying Evolutionary Principles
- Part X Evolution and the Media
- Index
- References
Summary
A cursory glance at human behavior suggests that men are considerably less careful with their lives than women. They are up to four times more likely to die from external causes (Kruger & Nesse, 2006). Many of these deaths are the result of car accidents, and men commit 97 percent of drink-driving offenses in Britain (Social Issues Research Centre, 2004). Men also die at a higher rate from nonvehicle accidents, such as drowning, falling, and electrocution (Pampel, 2001). They are the victims in 77 percent of homicides and the perpetrators in 88 percent of them (Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2012). They participate more often in extreme sports such as skydiving and mountain climbing (Robinson, 2008). The evolutionary explanation for men’s seemingly careless attitude to survival is that such behaviors are men’s way of conspicuously showing off their appetite for risk, the better to elicit respect from other men and sexual interest from women.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Andreano, J. M., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). Sex differences in the persistence of the amygdala response to negative material. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 1388–1394.Google Scholar
Anokhin, A. P., & Golosheykin, S. (2010). Startle modulation by affective faces. Biological Psychology, 83(1), 37–40.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 249–311.Google Scholar
Arrindell, W. A., Eisemann, M., Richter, J., et al. (2003). Phobic anxiety in 11 nations. Part I: Dimensional consistency of the five factor model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 461–479.Google Scholar
Arrindell, W. A., Kolk, A. M., Pickersgill, M. J., & Hageman, W. J. (1993). Biological sex, sex role orientation, masculine sex role stress, dissimulation and self reported fears. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15, 103–146.Google Scholar
Arrindell, W. A., Mulkens, S., Kok, J., & Vollenbroek, J. (1999). Disgust sensitivity and the sex difference in fears to common indigenous animals. Behavior Research and Therapy, 37(3), 273–280.Google Scholar
Bardeen, J. R., & Orcutt, H. K. (2011). Attentional control as a moderator of the relationship between posttraumatic stress symptoms and attentional threat bias. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(8), 1008–1018.Google Scholar
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6, 166–203.Google Scholar
Bernstein, D. A., & Allen, G. J. (1969). Fear Survey Schedule (II): Normative data and factor analyses based on a large college sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 7, 403–407.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, B. A., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 422–447.Google Scholar
Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117–127.Google Scholar
Bovin, M. J., & Marx, B. P. (2011). The importance of the peritraumatic experience in defining traumatic stress. Psychological Bulletin, 137(1), 47–67.Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Sabatinelli, D., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation II: Sex differences in picture processing. Emotion, 1(3), 300–319.Google Scholar
Brebner, J. (2003). Gender and emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 387–394.Google Scholar
Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In Lewis, M. & Haviland, J. M., eds., Handbook of Emotions. New York: Guildford Press, pp. 447–460.Google Scholar
Brown, L. M. (1998). Raising Their Voices: The Politics of Girls’ Anger. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bunaciu, L., Feldner, M. T., Babson, K. A., Zvolensky, M. J., & Eifert, G. H. (2012). Biological sex and panic-relevant anxious reactivity to abrupt increases in bodily arousal as a function of biological challenge intensity. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43, 526–531.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 7, 395–422.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.Google Scholar
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367–383.Google Scholar
Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(6), 477–484.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (1982). Female aggression. In Marsh, P. & Campbell, A., eds., Aggression and Violence. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 137–150.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (1995). A few good men: Evolutionary psychology and female adolescent aggression. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 99–123.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (2006). Sex differences in direct aggression: What are the psychological mediators? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 237–264.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Coombes, C., David, R., et al. (2016). Sex differences are not attenuated by a sex-invariant measure of fear: The Situated Fear Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 210–219.Google Scholar
Carlson, J. M., Cha, J., & Mujica-Parodi, L. R. (2013). Functional and structural amygdala–anterior cingulate connectivity correlates with attentional bias to masked fearful faces. Cortex, 49(9), 2595–2600.Google Scholar
Carlson, J. M., & Mujica-Parodi, L. R. (2015). Facilitated attentional orienting and delayed disengagement to conscious and nonconscious fearful faces. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 39(1), 69–77.Google Scholar
Carlson, J. M., Mujica-Parodi, L. R., Harmon-Jones, E., & Hajcak, G. (2012). The orienting of spatial attention to backward masked fearful faces is associated with variation in the serotonin transporter gene. Emotion, 12(2), 203–207.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.Google Scholar
Coid, J., Yang, M., Ullrich, S., Roberts, A., & Hare, R. D. (2009). Prevalence and correlates of psychopathic traits in the household population of Great Britain. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32(2), 65–73.Google Scholar
Cote, S., Tremblay, R. E., Nagin, D., Zoccolillo, M., & Vitaro, F. (2002). The development of impulsivity, fearfulness and helpfulness during childhood: Patterns of consistency and change in the trajectories of boys and girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 43, 609–618.Google Scholar
Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel – Now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 59–70.Google Scholar
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.Google Scholar
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.Google Scholar
Cross, C. P., Copping, L. T., & Campbell, A. (2011). Sex differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(1), 97–130.Google Scholar
Dart, A. M., Du, X. J., & Kingwell, B. A. (2002). Gender, sex hormones and autonomic nervous control of the cardiovascular system. Cardiovascular Research, 53, 678–687.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Daughters, S. B., Gorka, S. M., Matusiewicz, A., & Anderson, K. G. (2013). Gender specific effect of psychological stress and cortisol reactivity on adolescent risk taking. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 749–758.Google Scholar
Davis, M., Falls, W. A., Campeau, S., & Kim, M. (1993). Fear-potentiated startle: a neural and pharmacological analysis. Behavioural Brain Research, 58(1–2), 175–198.Google Scholar
Davis, F. C., Somerville, L. H., Ruberry, E. J., et al. (2011). A tale of two negatives: Differential memory modulation by threat-related facial expressions. Emotion, 11(3), 647–655.Google Scholar
DeLisi, L. E., Maurizio, A., Yost, M., et al. (2003). A survey of New Yorkers after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 780–3.Google Scholar
Dillon, K. M., Wolf, E., & Katz, H. (1985). Sex roles, gender, and fear. Journal of Psychology, 119, 355–359.Google Scholar
Dittmar, O., Krehl, R., & Lautenbacher, S. (2011). Interrelation of self-report, behavioural and electrophysiological measures assessing pain-related information processing. Pain Research and Management, 16(1), 33–40.Google Scholar
Domes, G., Lischke, A., Berger, C., et al. (2010). Effects of intranasal oxytocin on emotional face processing in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35, 83–93.Google Scholar
Duncan, N. (1999). Sexual Bullying: Gender Conflict and Pupil Culture in Secondary Schools. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309–330.Google Scholar
Eastwick, P. W. (2009). Beyond the Pleistocene: Using phylogeny and constraint to inform the evolutionary psychology of human mating. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 794–821.Google Scholar
Ellis, L. (1995). Dominance and reproductive success among nonhuman animals: A cross-species comparison. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(4), 257–333.Google Scholar
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., Goldsmith, H. H., & Van Hulle, C. A. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 33–72.Google Scholar
Eriksson, K., & Simpson, B. (2010). Emotional reactions to losing explain gender differences in entering a risk lottery. Judgement and Decision Making, 5, 159–163.Google Scholar
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2012). Crime in the United States 2011. www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-33.Google Scholar
Fessler, D. M. T., Tiokhin, L. B., Holbrook, C., Gervais, M. M., & Snyder, J. K. (2014). Foundations of the Crazy Bastard Hypothesis: Nonviolent physical risk-taking enhances conceptualized formidability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 26–33.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. H. (1993). Sex differences in emotionality: Fact or stereotype? Feminism and Psychology, 3, 303–318.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2000). Gender and emotions in different cultures. In Fischer, A. H., ed., Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–94.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. H., Mosquera, P. M. R., van Vianen, A., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). Gender and culture differences in emotion. Emotion, 4, 87–94.Google Scholar
Fischer, D., & Hills, T. T. (2012). The baby effect and young male syndrome: Social influences on cooperative risk-taking in women and men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 530–536.Google Scholar
Gabriel, K. A., & Williamson, A. (2010). Framing alters risk-taking behavior on a modified Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) in a sex-specific manner. Psychological Reports, 107(3), 699–712.Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–587.Google Scholar
Gartstein, M. A., & Rothbart, M. K. (2003). Studying infant temperament via the Revised Infant Behavior Questionnaire. Infant Behavior and Development, 26, 64–86.Google Scholar
Gavrilets, S. (2012). Human origins and the transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 9923–9928.Google Scholar
Goel, N., Workman, J. L., Lee, T. T., Innala, L., & Viau, V. (2014). Sex differences in the HPA axis. Comprehensive Physiology, 4, 1121–1155.Google Scholar
Gordon, I., Zagoory-Sharon, O., Leckman, J. F., & Feldman, R. (2010). Prolactin, oxytocin, and the development of paternal behavior across the first six months of fatherhood. Hormones and Behavior, 58, 513–518.Google Scholar
Gray, P. B., & Anderson, K. G. (2010). Fatherhood: Evolution and Human Paternal Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griez, E. J., Colasanti, A., van Diest, R., Salamon, E., & Schruers, K. (2007). Carbon dioxide inhalation induces dose-dependent and age-related negative affectivity. PLoS ONE, 2, e987.Google Scholar
Gullone, E. (2000). The development of normal fear: A century of research. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 429–451.Google Scholar
Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Longevity among hunter–gatherers: A cross-cultural examination. Population and Development Review, 33(2), 321–365.Google Scholar
Hall, K. (2002). Who do men and women gossip about and what is discussed about them? Unpublished dissertation, Durham University.Google Scholar
Hamann, S. (2005). Sex differences in the responses of the human amygdala. Neuroscientist, 11, 288–293.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R., Jenkins, M., & Glaser, D. (2006). Gender differences in risk assessment: Why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 48–63.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2012). The puzzle of monogamous marriage. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 657–669.Google Scholar
Hermans, E. J., Putman, P., Baas, J. M., Koppeschaar, H. P., & van Honk, J. (2006). A single administration of testosterone reduces fear-potentiated startle in humans. Biological Psychology, 59(9), 872–874.Google Scholar
Hermans, E. J., Putman, P., Baas, J. M., et al. (2007). Exogenous testosterone attenuates the integrated central stress response in healthy young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32(8–10), 1052–1061.Google Scholar
Holbrook, T. L., Hoyt, D. B., Stein, M. B., & Sieber, W. J. (2002). Gender differences in long-term posttraumatic stress disorder outcomes after major trauma: Women are at higher risk of adverse outcomes than men. Journal of Trauma, 53, 882–888.Google Scholar
Holland, B., & Rice, W. R. (1999). Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 5083–5088.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother Nature: Natural Selection and the Female of the Species. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Jasper, F., & Whitthoft, M. (2011). Health anxiety and attentional bias: The time course of vigilance and avoidance in light of pictorial illness information. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(8), 1131–1138.Google Scholar
Joe Laidler, K., & Hunt, G. (2001). Accomplishing femininity among the girls in the gang. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 656–678.Google Scholar
Jokela, M., Rotkirch, A., Rickard, I. J., Pettav, J., & Lummaa, V. (2010). Serial monogamy increases reproductive success in men but not in women. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 906–912.Google Scholar
Jones, J. H. (2009). The force of selection on the human life cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 305–314.Google Scholar
Kajantie, E., & Phillips, D. I. W. (2006). The effects of sex and hormonal status on the physiological response to acute psychosocial stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 31, 151–178.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 156–185.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. M., Forsyth, J. P., & Karekla, M. (2006). Sex differences in response to a panicogenic challenge procedure: An experimental evaluation of panic vulnerability in a non-clinical sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1421–1430.Google Scholar
Kessler, R. C., Sonnega, A., Bromet, E., Hughes, M., & Nelson, C. B. (1995). PTSD in the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 1048–1060.Google Scholar
Klein, A. K., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2011). Approach and avoidance tendencies in spider fearful children: The Approach–Avoidance Task. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20, 224–231.Google Scholar
Knight, G. P., Fabes, R. A., & Higgins, D. A. (1996). Concerns about drawing causal inferences from meta-analyses: An example in the study of gender differences in aggression. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 410–421.Google Scholar
Knight, G. P., Guthrie, I. L., Page, M. C., & Fabes, R. A. (2002). Emotional arousal and gender differences in aggression: A meta-analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 366–393.Google Scholar
Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. D. (2008). Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 919–948.Google Scholar
Kring, A. M. (2000). Gender and anger. In Fischer, A. H., ed., Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–231.Google Scholar
Kruger, D. J., & Nesse, R. M. (2006). An evolutionary life-history framework for understanding sex differences in human mortality rates. Human Nature, 17, 74–97.Google Scholar
Kudielka, B. M., & Kirschbaum, C. (2005). Sex differences in HPA axis responses to stress: A review. Biological Psychology, 69, 113–132.Google Scholar
Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 30(3), 261–273.Google Scholar
Lang, P. J., Ohman, A., & Vaitl, D. (1988). The International Affective Picture System (Photographic Slides). Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Lebron-Milad, K., Abbs, B., Milad, M. R., et al. (2012). Sex differences in the neurobiology of fear conditioning and extinction: A preliminary fMRI study of shared sex differences with stress-arousal circuitry. Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, 2, 7.Google Scholar
Lee, T. H., Sakaki, M., Cheng, R., Velasco, R., & Mather, M. (2014). Emotional arousal amplifies the effects of biased competition in the brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(12), 2067–2077.Google Scholar
Lee, Z., & Salekin, R. T. (2010). Psychopathy in a noninstitutional sample: Differences in primary and secondary subtypes. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1(3), 153–169.Google Scholar
Leibold, N. K., Viechtbauer, W., Goossens, L., et al. (2013). Carbon dioxide inhalation as a human experimental model of panic: The relationship between emotions and cardiovascular physiology. Biological Psychology, 94, 331–340.Google Scholar
Lighthall, N. R., Mather, M., & Gorlick, M. A. (2009). Acute stress increases sex differences in risk seeking in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. PLoS ONE, 4, e6002.Google Scholar
Lischke, A., Gamer, M., Berger, C., et al. (2012). Oxytocin increases amygdala reactivity to threatening scenes in females. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(9), 1431–1438.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286.Google Scholar
Lungu, O., Potvin, S., Tikasz, A., & Mendrek, A. (2015). Sex differences in effective fronto-limbic connectivity during negative emotion processing. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 62, 180–188.Google Scholar
Lykken, D. T. (1957). A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 6–10.Google Scholar
Maher, A. M., Thomson, C. J., & Carlson, S. R. (2015). Risk-taking and impulsive personality traits in proficient downhill sports enthusiasts. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 20–24.Google Scholar
Marsh, P., & Paton, R. (1986). Gender, social class and conceptual schemas of aggression. In Campbell, A. & Gibbs, J., eds., Violent Transactions: The Limits of Personality. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 59–85.Google Scholar
McClure, E. B., Monk, C. S., Nelson, E. E., et al. (2004). A developmental examination of gender differences in brain engagement during evaluation of threat. Biological Psychiatry, 55, 1047–1055.Google Scholar
McCraw, K. S., & Valentiner, D. P. (2015). The Circumscribed Fear Measure: Development and initial validation of a trans-stimulus phobia measure. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 403–414.Google Scholar
McDermott, M. J., Peck, K. R., Walters, A. B., & Smitherman, T. A. (2013). Do episodic migraineurs selectively attend to headache-related visual stimuli? Headache, 53(2), 356–364.Google Scholar
McDougall, P., & Vaillancourt, T. (2015). Long-term adult outcomes of peer victimization in childhood and adolescence pathways to adjustment and maladjustment. American Psychologist, 70(4), 300–310.Google Scholar
McLean, C. P., & Hope, D. A. (2010). Subjective anxiety and behavioral avoidance: Gender, gender role, and perceived confirmability of self-report. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 494–502.Google Scholar
McManis, M. H., Bradley, M. M., Berg, W. K., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotional reactions in children: Verbal, physiological, and behavioral responses to affective pictures. Psychophysiology, 38(2), 222–231.Google Scholar
Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (1999). Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university women. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 361–368.Google Scholar
Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1995). Sex differences in distress: Real or artifact? American Sociological Review, 60, 449–468.Google Scholar
Moriguchi, Y., Touroutoglou, A., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). Sex differences in the neural correlates of affective experience. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 591–600.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, T., Sharma, M., Nabeshima, Y., Braun, R. E., & Yoshida, S. (2010). Functional hierarchy and reversibility within the murine spermatogenic stem cell compartment. Science, 328(5974), 62–67.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. (2015). Are women really more risk-averse than men? A re-analysis of the literature using expanded methods. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(3), 566–585.Google Scholar
Nevo, O., Nevo, B., & Derech-Zehavi, A. (1993). The development of the Tendency to Gossip Questionnaire: Construct and concurrent validity for a sample of Israeli college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 973–981.Google Scholar
Nillni, Y. I., Berenz, E. C., Rohan, K. J., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2012). Sex differences in panic-relevant responding to a 10% carbon dioxide-enriched air biological challenge. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26, 165–172.Google Scholar
Nugent, A. C., Bain, E. E., Thayer, J. F., Sollers, J. J., & Drevets, W. C. (2011). Sex differences in the neural correlates of autonomic arousal: A pilot PET study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 80, 182–191.Google Scholar
Olff, M., Langeland, W., & Gersons, B. P. R. (2005). Effects of appraisal and coping on the neuroendocrine response to extreme stress. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 457–467.Google Scholar
Olff, M., Langeland, W., Draijer, N., & Gersons, B. P. (2007). Gender differences in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 183–204.Google Scholar
Ordaz, S., & Luna, B. (2012). Sex differences in physiological reactivity to acute psychosocial stress in adolescence. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(8), 1135–1157.Google Scholar
Ozer, E. J., Best, S. R., Lipsey, T. L., & Weiss, D. S. (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 52–73.Google Scholar
Pampel, F. C. (2001). Gender equality and the sex differential in mortality from accidents in high income nations. Population Research and Policy Review, 20, 397–421.Google Scholar
Patrick, C.J., Bradley, M.M., & Lang, P.J. (1993) Emotion in the criminal psychopath: Startle reflex modulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 89–92.Google Scholar
Pavard, S., Gagnon, A., Desjardins, B., & Heyer, E. (2005). Mother’s death and child survival: The case of early Quebec. Journal of Biosocial Science, 37, 209–227.Google Scholar
Perusse, D. (1993). Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(2), 267–283.Google Scholar
Pickersgill, M. J., & Arrindell, W. A. (1994). Men are innocent until proven guilty: A comment on the examination of sex differences by Pierce and Kirkpatrick (1992). Behavior Research and Therapy, 32(1), 21–28.Google Scholar
Powell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 605–628.Google Scholar
Quevedo, K., Smith, T., Donzella, B., Schunk, E., & Gunnar, M. (2010). The startle response: Developmental effects and a paradigm for children and adults. Developmental Psychobiology, 52(1), 78–89.Google Scholar
Reno, P. L., Meindl, R. S., McCollum, M. A., & Lovejoy, C. O. (2003). Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis was similar to that of modern humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 9404–9409.Google Scholar
Richards, H. J., Benson, V., Donnelly, N., & Hadwin, J. (2014). Exploring the function of selective attention and hypervigilance for threat in anxiety. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 1–13.Google Scholar
Robinson, V. (2008). Everyday Masculinities and Extreme Sports: Male Identity and Rock Climbing. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Schmukle, S. C. (2005). Unreliability of the dot probe task. European Journal of Personality, 19, 595–605.Google Scholar
Schofield, C. A., Johnson, A. L., Inhoff, A. W., & Coles, M. E. (2012). Social anxiety and difficulty disengaging threat: Evidence from eye-tracking. Cognition & Emotion, 26(2), 300–311.Google Scholar
Schwabe, L., Höffken, O., Tegenthoff, M., & Wolf, O. T. (2013). Opposite effects of noradrenergic arousal on amygdala processing of fearful faces in men and women. NeuroImage, 73, 1–7.Google Scholar
Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.Google Scholar
Sear, R., Steele, F., McGregor, A. A., & Mace, R. (2002). The effects of kin on child mortality in rural Gambia. Demography, 39, 43–63.Google Scholar
Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., et al. (2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(9), 2349–2356.Google Scholar
Simmons, R. (2002). Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls. London: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Simon, R. W., & Nath, L. E. (2004). Gender and emotion in the United States: Do men and women differ in self-reports of feelings and expressive behavior? American Journal of Sociology, 109, 1137–1176.Google Scholar
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D., eds., Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge, MA/New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 397–420.Google Scholar
Social Issues Research Centre (2004). Sex differences in driving and insurance risk: An analysis of the social and psychological differences between men and women that are relevant to their driving behaviour. www.sirc.org/publik/driving.pdf.Google Scholar
Spindler, H., Elkit, A., & Christiansen, D. (2010). Risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder following an industrial disaster in a residential area: A note on the origin of observed gender differences. Gender Medicine, 7(2), 156–165.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, T. A., Cooch, N. K., & Schoenbaum, G. (2015). What the orbitofrontal cortex does not do. Nature Neuroscience, 18(5), 620–627.Google Scholar
Stein, M. B., Walker, J. R., & Forde, D. R. (2000). Gender differences in susceptibility to posttraumatic stress disorder. Behavior Research and Therapy, 38, 619–628.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. S., & Hamann, S. (2012). Sex differences in brain activation to emotional stimuli: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1578–1593.Google Scholar
Stewart-Williams, S., & Thomas, A. G. (2013). The ape that thought it was a peacock: Does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences? Psychological Inquiry, 24(3), 137–168.Google Scholar
Stoyanova, M., & Hope, D. A. (2012). Gender, gender roles, and anxiety: Perceived confirmability of self report, behavioral avoidance, and physiological reactivity. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26, 206–214.Google Scholar
Stroud, L. R., Salovey, P., & Epel, E. S. (2002). Sex differences in stress responses: Social rejection versus achievement stress. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 318–327.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., et al. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to tress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411–429.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. M., Drevets, W. C., Whalen, P. J., et al. (2001). Amygdala response to facial expressions in children and adults. Biological Psychiatry, 49, 309–316.Google Scholar
Tian, Q., & Smith, J. C. (2011). Attentional bias to emotional stimuli is altered during moderate- but not high-intensity exercise. Emotion, 11(6), 1415–1424.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T. & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37(6), 568–576.Google Scholar
Van Bockstaele, B., Verschuere, B., Koster, E. H. W., et al. (2011a). Differential predictive power of self report and implicit measures on behavioral and physiological fear responses to spiders. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 79(2), 166–174.Google Scholar
Van Bockstaele, B., Verschuere, B., Koster, E. H. W., et al. (2011b). Effects of attention training on self-reported, implicit, physiological and behavioral measures of spider fear. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42, 211–218.Google Scholar
Van Bockstaele, B., Verschuere, B., Tibboel, H., et al. (2014). A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety. Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 682–721.Google Scholar
Van Honk, J., & Schutter, D. J. L. G. (2006). Unmasking feigned sanity: A neurobiological model of emotion processing in primary psychopathy. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 11(3), 285–306.Google Scholar
Van Ryckeghem, D. M. L., Crombez, G., Van Hulle, L., & Van Damme, S. (2012). Attentional bias towards pain-related information diminishes the efficacy of distraction. Pain, 153(12), 2345–2351.Google Scholar
Van Wyhe, J., ed. (2002). The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. http://darwin-online.org.uk.Google Scholar
Vogt, J., De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., & Van Damme, S. (2013). Competing for attentional priority: Temporary goals versus threats. Emotion, 13(3), 587–598.Google Scholar
Wager, T. D., Phan, K. L., Liberzon, I., & Taylor, S. F. (2003). Valence, gender, and lateralization of functional brain anatomy in emotion: a meta-analysis of findings from neuroimaging. NeuroImage, 19, 513–531.Google Scholar
Weir, L. K., Grant, J. W. A., & Hutchings, J. A. (2011). The influence of operational sex ratio on the intensity of competition for mates. American Naturalist, 177(2), 167–176.Google Scholar
Whittle, S., Yucel, M., Yap, M. B. H., & Allen, N. B. (2011). Sex differences in the neural correlates of emotion: evidence from neuroimaging. Biological Psychology, 87, 319–333.Google Scholar
Williams, L. M., Barton, M. J., Kemp, A. H., et al. (2005). Distinct amygdala–autonomic arousal profiles in response to fear signals in healthy males and females. NeuroImage, 28(3), 618–625.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 59–73.Google Scholar
Winking, J., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2011). Father death and adult success among the Tsimane: Implications for marriage and divorce. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(2), 79–89.Google Scholar
Wood, A., Rychlowska, M., Korb, S., & Niedenthal, P. (2016). Fashioning the face: Sensorimotor simulation contributes to facial expression recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20 (3), 227–240.Google Scholar
Worthman, C. M., Jenkins, C. L., Stallings, J. F., & Daina, N.L. (1993). Attenuation of nursing-related ovarian suppression and high fertility in well-nourished, intensively breast-feeding Amele women of lowland Papua New Guinea. Journal of Biosocial Science, 25, 425–443.Google Scholar
Wynn, M. H., Høiseth, M. H., & Pettersen, G. (2012). Psychopathy in women: Theoretical and clinical perspectives. International Journal of Women’s Health, 4, 257–263.Google Scholar
Yang, Z., Jackson, T., & Chen, H. (2013). Effects of chronic pain and pain-related fear on orienting and maintenance of attention: An eye movement study. Journal of Pain, 14(10), 1148–1157.Google Scholar
Yiend, J. (2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 3–47.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by