Barkow, J. H. (1989). Darwin, Sex, and Status: Biological Approaches to Mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (2015). Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, A. (2013). A Mind of Her Own: The Evolutionary Psychology of Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronin, H. (1991). The Ant and the Peacock: Altruism and Sexual Selection from Darwin to Today. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1859). On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1915). The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Review, 7, 184–192.Google Scholar

Jones, A. G., & Ratterman, N. L. (2009). Mate choice and sexual selection: What have we learned since Darwin? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10001–10008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwartz, G., Kim, R. M., Kolundziji, A. B., Rieger, G., & Sanders, A. R. (2010). Biodemographic and physical correlates of sexual orientation in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 93–109.Google Scholar

Stewart-Williams, S. (2018). The Ape That Understood the Universe: How the Mind and Culture Evolve. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart-Williams, S., & Thomas, A. G. (2013). The ape that thought it was a peacock: Does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences? Psychological Inquiry, 24, 137–168.Google Scholar

Toates, F. (2014). How Sexual Desire Works: The Enigmatic Urge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B., ed., Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton, pp. 136–179.Google Scholar

Andreano, J. M., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). Sex differences in the persistence of the amygdala response to negative material. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 1388–1394.Google Scholar

Anokhin, A. P., & Golosheykin, S. (2010). Startle modulation by affective faces. Biological Psychology, 83(1), 37–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 249–311.Google Scholar

Arrindell, W. A., Eisemann, M., Richter, J., et al. (2003). Phobic anxiety in 11 nations. Part I: Dimensional consistency of the five factor model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 461–479.Google Scholar

Arrindell, W. A., Kolk, A. M., Pickersgill, M. J., & Hageman, W. J. (1993). Biological sex, sex role orientation, masculine sex role stress, dissimulation and self reported fears. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15, 103–146.Google Scholar

Arrindell, W. A., Mulkens, S., Kok, J., & Vollenbroek, J. (1999). Disgust sensitivity and the sex difference in fears to common indigenous animals. Behavior Research and Therapy, 37(3), 273–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bardeen, J. R., & Orcutt, H. K. (2011). Attentional control as a moderator of the relationship between posttraumatic stress symptoms and attentional threat bias. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(8), 1008–1018.Google Scholar

Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6, 166–203.Google Scholar

Bernstein, D. A., & Allen, G. J. (1969). Fear Survey Schedule (II): Normative data and factor analyses based on a large college sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 7, 403–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettencourt, B. A., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 422–447.Google Scholar

Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117–127.Google Scholar

Bovin, M. J., & Marx, B. P. (2011). The importance of the peritraumatic experience in defining traumatic stress. Psychological Bulletin, 137(1), 47–67.Google Scholar

Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Sabatinelli, D., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation II: Sex differences in picture processing. Emotion, 1(3), 300–319.Google Scholar

Brebner, J. (2003). Gender and emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In Lewis, M. & Haviland, J. M., eds., Handbook of Emotions. New York: Guildford Press, pp. 447–460.Google Scholar

Brown, L. M. (1998). Raising Their Voices: The Politics of Girls’ Anger. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bunaciu, L., Feldner, M. T., Babson, K. A., Zvolensky, M. J., & Eifert, G. H. (2012). Biological sex and panic-relevant anxious reactivity to abrupt increases in bodily arousal as a function of biological challenge intensity. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43, 526–531.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 7, 395–422.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367–383.Google Scholar

Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(6), 477–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, A. (1982). Female aggression. In Marsh, P. & Campbell, A., eds., Aggression and Violence. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 137–150.Google Scholar

Campbell, A. (1984). The Girls in the Gang. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Campbell, A. (1995). A few good men: Evolutionary psychology and female adolescent aggression. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 99–123.Google Scholar

Campbell, A. (2006). Sex differences in direct aggression: What are the psychological mediators? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 237–264.Google Scholar

Campbell, A., Coombes, C., David, R., et al. (2016). Sex differences are not attenuated by a sex-invariant measure of fear: The Situated Fear Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, J. M., Cha, J., & Mujica-Parodi, L. R. (2013). Functional and structural amygdala–anterior cingulate connectivity correlates with attentional bias to masked fearful faces. Cortex, 49(9), 2595–2600.Google Scholar

Carlson, J. M., & Mujica-Parodi, L. R. (2015). Facilitated attentional orienting and delayed disengagement to conscious and nonconscious fearful faces. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 39(1), 69–77.Google Scholar

Carlson, J. M., Mujica-Parodi, L. R., Harmon-Jones, E., & Hajcak, G. (2012). The orienting of spatial attention to backward masked fearful faces is associated with variation in the serotonin transporter gene. Emotion, 12(2), 203–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.Google Scholar

Coid, J., Yang, M., Ullrich, S., Roberts, A., & Hare, R. D. (2009). Prevalence and correlates of psychopathic traits in the household population of Great Britain. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32(2), 65–73.Google Scholar

Cote, S., Tremblay, R. E., Nagin, D., Zoccolillo, M., & Vitaro, F. (2002). The development of impulsivity, fearfulness and helpfulness during childhood: Patterns of consistency and change in the trajectories of boys and girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 43, 609–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel – Now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 59–70.Google Scholar

Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.Google Scholar

Cross, C. P., Copping, L. T., & Campbell, A. (2011). Sex differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(1), 97–130.Google Scholar

Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Dart, A. M., Du, X. J., & Kingwell, B. A. (2002). Gender, sex hormones and autonomic nervous control of the cardiovascular system. Cardiovascular Research, 53, 678–687.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1859). On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Daughters, S. B., Gorka, S. M., Matusiewicz, A., & Anderson, K. G. (2013). Gender specific effect of psychological stress and cortisol reactivity on adolescent risk taking. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 749–758.Google Scholar

Davis, M., Falls, W. A., Campeau, S., & Kim, M. (1993). Fear-potentiated startle: a neural and pharmacological analysis. Behavioural Brain Research, 58(1–2), 175–198.Google Scholar

Davis, F. C., Somerville, L. H., Ruberry, E. J., et al. (2011). A tale of two negatives: Differential memory modulation by threat-related facial expressions. Emotion, 11(3), 647–655.Google Scholar

DeLisi, L. E., Maurizio, A., Yost, M., et al. (2003). A survey of New Yorkers after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 780–3.Google Scholar

Dillon, K. M., Wolf, E., & Katz, H. (1985). Sex roles, gender, and fear. Journal of Psychology, 119, 355–359.Google Scholar

Dittmar, O., Krehl, R., & Lautenbacher, S. (2011). Interrelation of self-report, behavioural and electrophysiological measures assessing pain-related information processing. Pain Research and Management, 16(1), 33–40.Google Scholar

Domes, G., Lischke, A., Berger, C., et al. (2010). Effects of intranasal oxytocin on emotional face processing in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35, 83–93.Google Scholar

Duncan, N. (1999). Sexual Bullying: Gender Conflict and Pupil Culture in Secondary Schools. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309–330.Google Scholar

Eastwick, P. W. (2009). Beyond the Pleistocene: Using phylogeny and constraint to inform the evolutionary psychology of human mating. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 794–821.Google Scholar

Ellis, L. (1995). Dominance and reproductive success among nonhuman animals: A cross-species comparison. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(4), 257–333.Google Scholar

Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., Goldsmith, H. H., & Van Hulle, C. A. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 33–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eriksson, K., & Simpson, B. (2010). Emotional reactions to losing explain gender differences in entering a risk lottery. Judgement and Decision Making, 5, 159–163.Google Scholar

Federal Bureau of Investigation (2012). Crime in the United States 2011. www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-33.Google Scholar

Fessler, D. M. T., Tiokhin, L. B., Holbrook, C., Gervais, M. M., & Snyder, J. K. (2014). Foundations of the Crazy Bastard Hypothesis: Nonviolent physical risk-taking enhances conceptualized formidability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, A. H. (1993). Sex differences in emotionality: Fact or stereotype? Feminism and Psychology, 3, 303–318.Google Scholar

Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2000). Gender and emotions in different cultures. In Fischer, A. H., ed., Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–94.Google Scholar

Fischer, A. H., Mosquera, P. M. R., van Vianen, A., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). Gender and culture differences in emotion. Emotion, 4, 87–94.Google Scholar

Fischer, D., & Hills, T. T. (2012). The baby effect and young male syndrome: Social influences on cooperative risk-taking in women and men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 530–536.Google Scholar

Gabriel, K. A., & Williamson, A. (2010). Framing alters risk-taking behavior on a modified Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) in a sex-specific manner. Psychological Reports, 107(3), 699–712.Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–587.Google Scholar

Gartstein, M. A., & Rothbart, M. K. (2003). Studying infant temperament via the Revised Infant Behavior Questionnaire. Infant Behavior and Development, 26, 64–86.Google Scholar

Gavrilets, S. (2012). Human origins and the transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 9923–9928.Google Scholar

Goel, N., Workman, J. L., Lee, T. T., Innala, L., & Viau, V. (2014). Sex differences in the HPA axis. Comprehensive Physiology, 4, 1121–1155.Google Scholar

Gordon, I., Zagoory-Sharon, O., Leckman, J. F., & Feldman, R. (2010). Prolactin, oxytocin, and the development of paternal behavior across the first six months of fatherhood. Hormones and Behavior, 58, 513–518.Google Scholar

Gray, P. B., & Anderson, K. G. (2010). Fatherhood: Evolution and Human Paternal Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Griez, E. J., Colasanti, A., van Diest, R., Salamon, E., & Schruers, K. (2007). Carbon dioxide inhalation induces dose-dependent and age-related negative affectivity. PLoS ONE, 2, e987.Google Scholar

Gullone, E. (2000). The development of normal fear: A century of research. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 429–451.Google Scholar

Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Longevity among hunter–gatherers: A cross-cultural examination. Population and Development Review, 33(2), 321–365.Google Scholar

Hall, K. (2002). Who do men and women gossip about and what is discussed about them? Unpublished dissertation, Durham University.Google Scholar

Hamann, S. (2005). Sex differences in the responses of the human amygdala. Neuroscientist, 11, 288–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harris, C. R., Jenkins, M., & Glaser, D. (2006). Gender differences in risk assessment: Why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 48–63.Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2012). The puzzle of monogamous marriage. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 657–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hermans, E. J., Putman, P., Baas, J. M., Koppeschaar, H. P., & van Honk, J. (2006). A single administration of testosterone reduces fear-potentiated startle in humans. Biological Psychology, 59(9), 872–874.Google Scholar

Hermans, E. J., Putman, P., Baas, J. M., et al. (2007). Exogenous testosterone attenuates the integrated central stress response in healthy young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32(8–10), 1052–1061.Google Scholar

Holbrook, T. L., Hoyt, D. B., Stein, M. B., & Sieber, W. J. (2002). Gender differences in long-term posttraumatic stress disorder outcomes after major trauma: Women are at higher risk of adverse outcomes than men. Journal of Trauma, 53, 882–888.Google Scholar

Holland, B., & Rice, W. R. (1999). Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 5083–5088.Google Scholar

Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother Nature: Natural Selection and the Female of the Species. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar

Jasper, F., & Whitthoft, M. (2011). Health anxiety and attentional bias: The time course of vigilance and avoidance in light of pictorial illness information. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(8), 1131–1138.Google Scholar

Joe Laidler, K., & Hunt, G. (2001). Accomplishing femininity among the girls in the gang. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 656–678.Google Scholar

Jokela, M., Rotkirch, A., Rickard, I. J., Pettav, J., & Lummaa, V. (2010). Serial monogamy increases reproductive success in men but not in women. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 906–912.Google Scholar

Jones, J. H. (2009). The force of selection on the human life cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 305–314.Google Scholar

Kajantie, E., & Phillips, D. I. W. (2006). The effects of sex and hormonal status on the physiological response to acute psychosocial stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 31, 151–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 156–185.Google Scholar

Kelly, M. M., Forsyth, J. P., & Karekla, M. (2006). Sex differences in response to a panicogenic challenge procedure: An experimental evaluation of panic vulnerability in a non-clinical sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1421–1430.Google Scholar

Kessler, R. C., Sonnega, A., Bromet, E., Hughes, M., & Nelson, C. B. (1995). PTSD in the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 1048–1060.Google Scholar

Klein, A. K., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2011). Approach and avoidance tendencies in spider fearful children: The Approach–Avoidance Task. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20, 224–231.Google Scholar

Knight, G. P., Fabes, R. A., & Higgins, D. A. (1996). Concerns about drawing causal inferences from meta-analyses: An example in the study of gender differences in aggression. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 410–421.Google Scholar

Knight, G. P., Guthrie, I. L., Page, M. C., & Fabes, R. A. (2002). Emotional arousal and gender differences in aggression: A meta-analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 366–393.Google Scholar

Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. D. (2008). Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 919–948.Google Scholar

Kring, A. M. (2000). Gender and anger. In Fischer, A. H., ed., Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–231.Google Scholar

Kruger, D. J., & Nesse, R. M. (2006). An evolutionary life-history framework for understanding sex differences in human mortality rates. Human Nature, 17, 74–97.Google Scholar

Kudielka, B. M., & Kirschbaum, C. (2005). Sex differences in HPA axis responses to stress: A review. Biological Psychology, 69, 113–132.Google Scholar

Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 30(3), 261–273.Google Scholar

Lang, P. J., Ohman, A., & Vaitl, D. (1988). The International Affective Picture System (Photographic Slides). Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar

Lebron-Milad, K., Abbs, B., Milad, M. R., et al. (2012). Sex differences in the neurobiology of fear conditioning and extinction: A preliminary fMRI study of shared sex differences with stress-arousal circuitry. Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, 2, 7.Google Scholar

Lee, T. H., Sakaki, M., Cheng, R., Velasco, R., & Mather, M. (2014). Emotional arousal amplifies the effects of biased competition in the brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(12), 2067–2077.Google Scholar

Lee, Z., & Salekin, R. T. (2010). Psychopathy in a noninstitutional sample: Differences in primary and secondary subtypes. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1(3), 153–169.Google Scholar

Lees, S. (1993). Sugar and Spice: Sexuality and Adolescent Girls. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Leibold, N. K., Viechtbauer, W., Goossens, L., et al. (2013). Carbon dioxide inhalation as a human experimental model of panic: The relationship between emotions and cardiovascular physiology. Biological Psychology, 94, 331–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lighthall, N. R., Mather, M., & Gorlick, M. A. (2009). Acute stress increases sex differences in risk seeking in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. PLoS ONE, 4, e6002.Google Scholar

Lischke, A., Gamer, M., Berger, C., et al. (2012). Oxytocin increases amygdala reactivity to threatening scenes in females. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(9), 1431–1438.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286.Google Scholar

Lungu, O., Potvin, S., Tikasz, A., & Mendrek, A. (2015). Sex differences in effective fronto-limbic connectivity during negative emotion processing. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 62, 180–188.Google Scholar

Lykken, D. T. (1957). A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 6–10.Google Scholar

Maher, A. M., Thomson, C. J., & Carlson, S. R. (2015). Risk-taking and impulsive personality traits in proficient downhill sports enthusiasts. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 20–24.Google Scholar

Marsh, P., & Paton, R. (1986). Gender, social class and conceptual schemas of aggression. In Campbell, A. & Gibbs, J., eds., Violent Transactions: The Limits of Personality. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 59–85.Google Scholar

McClure, E. B., Monk, C. S., Nelson, E. E., et al. (2004). A developmental examination of gender differences in brain engagement during evaluation of threat. Biological Psychiatry, 55, 1047–1055.Google Scholar

McCraw, K. S., & Valentiner, D. P. (2015). The Circumscribed Fear Measure: Development and initial validation of a trans-stimulus phobia measure. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 403–414.Google Scholar

McDermott, M. J., Peck, K. R., Walters, A. B., & Smitherman, T. A. (2013). Do episodic migraineurs selectively attend to headache-related visual stimuli? Headache, 53(2), 356–364.Google Scholar

McDougall, P., & Vaillancourt, T. (2015). Long-term adult outcomes of peer victimization in childhood and adolescence pathways to adjustment and maladjustment. American Psychologist, 70(4), 300–310.Google Scholar

McLean, C. P., & Hope, D. A. (2010). Subjective anxiety and behavioral avoidance: Gender, gender role, and perceived confirmability of self-report. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 494–502.Google Scholar

McManis, M. H., Bradley, M. M., Berg, W. K., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotional reactions in children: Verbal, physiological, and behavioral responses to affective pictures. Psychophysiology, 38(2), 222–231.Google Scholar

Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (1999). Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university women. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 361–368.Google Scholar

Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1995). Sex differences in distress: Real or artifact? American Sociological Review, 60, 449–468.Google Scholar

Moriguchi, Y., Touroutoglou, A., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). Sex differences in the neural correlates of affective experience. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 591–600.Google Scholar

Nakagawa, T., Sharma, M., Nabeshima, Y., Braun, R. E., & Yoshida, S. (2010). Functional hierarchy and reversibility within the murine spermatogenic stem cell compartment. Science, 328(5974), 62–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nelson, J. (2015). Are women really more risk-averse than men? A re-analysis of the literature using expanded methods. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(3), 566–585.Google Scholar

Nevo, O., Nevo, B., & Derech-Zehavi, A. (1993). The development of the Tendency to Gossip Questionnaire: Construct and concurrent validity for a sample of Israeli college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 973–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nillni, Y. I., Berenz, E. C., Rohan, K. J., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2012). Sex differences in panic-relevant responding to a 10% carbon dioxide-enriched air biological challenge. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nugent, A. C., Bain, E. E., Thayer, J. F., Sollers, J. J., & Drevets, W. C. (2011). Sex differences in the neural correlates of autonomic arousal: A pilot PET study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 80, 182–191.Google Scholar

Olff, M., Langeland, W., & Gersons, B. P. R. (2005). Effects of appraisal and coping on the neuroendocrine response to extreme stress. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 457–467.Google Scholar

Olff, M., Langeland, W., Draijer, N., & Gersons, B. P. (2007). Gender differences in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 183–204.Google Scholar

Ordaz, S., & Luna, B. (2012). Sex differences in physiological reactivity to acute psychosocial stress in adolescence. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(8), 1135–1157.Google Scholar

Ozer, E. J., Best, S. R., Lipsey, T. L., & Weiss, D. S. (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 52–73.Google Scholar

Pampel, F. C. (2001). Gender equality and the sex differential in mortality from accidents in high income nations. Population Research and Policy Review, 20, 397–421.Google Scholar

Patrick, C.J., Bradley, M.M., & Lang, P.J. (1993) Emotion in the criminal psychopath: Startle reflex modulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 89–92.Google Scholar

Pavard, S., Gagnon, A., Desjardins, B., & Heyer, E. (2005). Mother’s death and child survival: The case of early Quebec. Journal of Biosocial Science, 37, 209–227.Google Scholar

Perusse, D. (1993). Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(2), 267–283.Google Scholar

Pickersgill, M. J., & Arrindell, W. A. (1994). Men are innocent until proven guilty: A comment on the examination of sex differences by Pierce and Kirkpatrick (1992). Behavior Research and Therapy, 32(1), 21–28.Google Scholar

Powell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 605–628.Google Scholar

Quevedo, K., Smith, T., Donzella, B., Schunk, E., & Gunnar, M. (2010). The startle response: Developmental effects and a paradigm for children and adults. Developmental Psychobiology, 52(1), 78–89.Google Scholar

Reno, P. L., Meindl, R. S., McCollum, M. A., & Lovejoy, C. O. (2003). Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis was similar to that of modern humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 9404–9409.Google Scholar

Richards, H. J., Benson, V., Donnelly, N., & Hadwin, J. (2014). Exploring the function of selective attention and hypervigilance for threat in anxiety. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 1–13.Google Scholar

Robinson, V. (2008). Everyday Masculinities and Extreme Sports: Male Identity and Rock Climbing. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Schmukle, S. C. (2005). Unreliability of the dot probe task. European Journal of Personality, 19, 595–605.Google Scholar

Schofield, C. A., Johnson, A. L., Inhoff, A. W., & Coles, M. E. (2012). Social anxiety and difficulty disengaging threat: Evidence from eye-tracking. Cognition & Emotion, 26(2), 300–311.Google Scholar

Schwabe, L., Höffken, O., Tegenthoff, M., & Wolf, O. T. (2013). Opposite effects of noradrenergic arousal on amygdala processing of fearful faces in men and women. NeuroImage, 73, 1–7.Google Scholar

Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.Google Scholar

Sear, R., Steele, F., McGregor, A. A., & Mace, R. (2002). The effects of kin on child mortality in rural Gambia. Demography, 39, 43–63.Google Scholar

Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., et al. (2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(9), 2349–2356.Google Scholar

Simmons, R. (2002). Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls. London: Harcourt.Google Scholar

Simon, R. W., & Nath, L. E. (2004). Gender and emotion in the United States: Do men and women differ in self-reports of feelings and expressive behavior? American Journal of Sociology, 109, 1137–1176.Google Scholar

Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D., eds., Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge, MA/New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 397–420.Google Scholar

Social Issues Research Centre (2004). Sex differences in driving and insurance risk: An analysis of the social and psychological differences between men and women that are relevant to their driving behaviour. www.sirc.org/publik/driving.pdf.Google Scholar

Spindler, H., Elkit, A., & Christiansen, D. (2010). Risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder following an industrial disaster in a residential area: A note on the origin of observed gender differences. Gender Medicine, 7(2), 156–165.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, T. A., Cooch, N. K., & Schoenbaum, G. (2015). What the orbitofrontal cortex does not do. Nature Neuroscience, 18(5), 620–627.Google Scholar

Stein, M. B., Walker, J. R., & Forde, D. R. (2000). Gender differences in susceptibility to posttraumatic stress disorder. Behavior Research and Therapy, 38, 619–628.Google Scholar

Stevens, J. S., & Hamann, S. (2012). Sex differences in brain activation to emotional stimuli: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1578–1593.Google Scholar

Stewart-Williams, S., & Thomas, A. G. (2013). The ape that thought it was a peacock: Does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences? Psychological Inquiry, 24(3), 137–168.Google Scholar

Stoyanova, M., & Hope, D. A. (2012). Gender, gender roles, and anxiety: Perceived confirmability of self report, behavioral avoidance, and physiological reactivity. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26, 206–214.Google Scholar

Stroud, L. R., Salovey, P., & Epel, E. S. (2002). Sex differences in stress responses: Social rejection versus achievement stress. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 318–327.Google Scholar

Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., et al. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to tress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411–429.Google Scholar

Thomas, K. M., Drevets, W. C., Whalen, P. J., et al. (2001). Amygdala response to facial expressions in children and adults. Biological Psychiatry, 49, 309–316.Google Scholar

Tian, Q., & Smith, J. C. (2011). Attentional bias to emotional stimuli is altered during moderate- but not high-intensity exercise. Emotion, 11(6), 1415–1424.Google Scholar

Vaillancourt, T. & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37(6), 568–576.Google Scholar

Van Bockstaele, B., Verschuere, B., Koster, E. H. W., et al. (2011a). Differential predictive power of self report and implicit measures on behavioral and physiological fear responses to spiders. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 79(2), 166–174.Google Scholar

Van Bockstaele, B., Verschuere, B., Koster, E. H. W., et al. (2011b). Effects of attention training on self-reported, implicit, physiological and behavioral measures of spider fear. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42, 211–218.Google Scholar

Van Bockstaele, B., Verschuere, B., Tibboel, H., et al. (2014). A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety. Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 682–721.Google Scholar

Van Honk, J., & Schutter, D. J. L. G. (2006). Unmasking feigned sanity: A neurobiological model of emotion processing in primary psychopathy. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 11(3), 285–306.Google Scholar

Van Ryckeghem, D. M. L., Crombez, G., Van Hulle, L., & Van Damme, S. (2012). Attentional bias towards pain-related information diminishes the efficacy of distraction. Pain, 153(12), 2345–2351.Google Scholar

Van Wyhe, J., ed. (2002). The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. http://darwin-online.org.uk.Google Scholar

Vogt, J., De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., & Van Damme, S. (2013). Competing for attentional priority: Temporary goals versus threats. Emotion, 13(3), 587–598.Google Scholar

Wager, T. D., Phan, K. L., Liberzon, I., & Taylor, S. F. (2003). Valence, gender, and lateralization of functional brain anatomy in emotion: a meta-analysis of findings from neuroimaging. NeuroImage, 19, 513–531.Google Scholar

Weir, L. K., Grant, J. W. A., & Hutchings, J. A. (2011). The influence of operational sex ratio on the intensity of competition for mates. American Naturalist, 177(2), 167–176.Google Scholar

Whittle, S., Yucel, M., Yap, M. B. H., & Allen, N. B. (2011). Sex differences in the neural correlates of emotion: evidence from neuroimaging. Biological Psychology, 87, 319–333.Google Scholar

Williams, G. C. (1996). Plan and Purpose in Nature. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar

Williams, L. M., Barton, M. J., Kemp, A. H., et al. (2005). Distinct amygdala–autonomic arousal profiles in response to fear signals in healthy males and females. NeuroImage, 28(3), 618–625.Google Scholar

Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 59–73.Google Scholar

Winking, J., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2011). Father death and adult success among the Tsimane: Implications for marriage and divorce. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(2), 79–89.Google Scholar

Wood, A., Rychlowska, M., Korb, S., & Niedenthal, P. (2016). Fashioning the face: Sensorimotor simulation contributes to facial expression recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20 (3), 227–240.Google Scholar

Worthman, C. M., Jenkins, C. L., Stallings, J. F., & Daina, N.L. (1993). Attenuation of nursing-related ovarian suppression and high fertility in well-nourished, intensively breast-feeding Amele women of lowland Papua New Guinea. Journal of Biosocial Science, 25, 425–443.Google Scholar

Wynn, M. H., Høiseth, M. H., & Pettersen, G. (2012). Psychopathy in women: Theoretical and clinical perspectives. International Journal of Women’s Health, 4, 257–263.Google Scholar

Yang, Z., Jackson, T., & Chen, H. (2013). Effects of chronic pain and pain-related fear on orienting and maintenance of attention: An eye movement study. Journal of Pain, 14(10), 1148–1157.Google Scholar

Yiend, J. (2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 3–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anselme, P. (2010). The uncertainty processing theory of motivation. Behavioural Brain Research, 208(2), 291–310.Google Scholar

Antfolk, J., Salo, B., Alanko, K., et al. (2015). Women’s and men’s sexual preferences and activities with respect to the partner’s age: Evidence for female choice. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(1), 73–79.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. D., & Baldwin, J. I. (1997). Gender differences in sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26(2), 181–210.Google Scholar

Banca, P., Morris, L. S., Mitchell, S., et al. (2016). Novelty, conditioning and attentional bias to sexual rewards. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 72, 91–101.Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power → sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 768–781.Google Scholar

Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Basson, R., Leiblum, S., Brotto, L., et al. (2003). Definitions of women’s sexual dysfunction reconsidered: Advocating expansion and revision. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 24(4), 221–229.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 347–374.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 242–273.Google Scholar

Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., Houts, R. M., & Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (2010). The development of reproductive strategy in females: Early maternal harshness → earlier menarche → increased sexual risk taking. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 120–128.Google Scholar

Berridge, K. C. (2001). Reward learning: Reinforcement, incentives, and expectations. In Medin, D. L., ed., Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 40. New York: Academic Press, pp. 223–278.Google Scholar

Berridge, K. C. (2004). Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. Physiology & Behavior, 81(2), 179–209.Google Scholar

Bindra, D. (1978). How adaptive behavior is produced: A perceptual–motivational alternative to response reinforcements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 41–52.Google Scholar

Binter, J., Leongómez, J. D., Moyano, N., et al. (2012). Sex differences in the incidence of sexual fantasies focused on evolutionary relevant objects. Anthropologie, 50(1), 83–93.Google Scholar

Bjorklund, D. F., & Kipp, K. (1996). Parental investment theory and gender differences in the evolution of inhibition mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 163–188.Google Scholar

Bogaert, A. F. (2015). Asexuality: What it is and why it matters. Journal of Sex Research, 52(4), 362–379.Google Scholar

Boothroyd, L. G., Meins, E., Vukovic, J., & Burt, D. M. (2014). Developmental changes in children’s facial preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(5), 376–383.Google Scholar

Brand, M., Snagowski, J., Laier, C., & Maderwald, S. (2016). Ventral striatum activity when watching preferred pornographic pictures is correlated with symptoms of Internet pornography addiction. NeuroImage, 129, 224–232.Google Scholar

Buss, D. (2015). Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Hove: The Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3(4), 251–255.Google Scholar

Campbell, A. (2013). A Mind of Her Own: The Evolutionary Psychology of Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183–204.Google Scholar

Chivers, M. L. (2017). The specificity of women’s sexual response and its relationship with sexual orientations: A review and ten hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1161–1179.Google Scholar

Dewitte, M. (2015). Gender differences in liking and wanting sex: Examining the role of motivational context and implicit versus explicit processing. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(6), 1663–1674.Google Scholar

Dhuffar, M. K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Understanding conceptualisations of female sex addiction and recovery using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology Research, 5(10), 585–603.Google Scholar

Diamond, L. M. (2012). The desire disorder in research on sexual orientation in women: Contributions of dynamical systems theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 73–83.Google Scholar

Dickson, N., Paul, C., Herbison, P., & Silva, P. (1998). First sexual intercourse: Age, coercion, and later regrets reported by a birth cohort. British Medical Journal, 316(7124), 29–33.Google Scholar

Doom, J. R., Vanzomeren-Dohm, A. A., & Simpson, J. A. (2016). Early unpredictability predicts increased adolescent externalizing behaviors and substance use: A life history perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 28(4 Pt 2), 1505–1516.Google Scholar

Ellis, B. J., & Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach. Journal of Sex Research, 27(4), 527–555.Google Scholar

Ellis, B. J., Del Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., et al. (2012). The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice. Developmental Psychology, 48(3), 598–623.Google Scholar

Felson, R. B., & Cundiff, P. R. (2012). Age and sexual assault during robberies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 13, 10–16.Google Scholar

Felson, R. B., & Cundiff, P. R. (2014). Sexual assault as a crime against young people. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 273–284Google Scholar

Fleischman, D. S., Hamilton, L. D., Fessler, D. M., & Meston, C. M. (2015). Disgust versus lust: Exploring the interactions of disgust and fear with sexual arousal in women. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0118151.Google Scholar

Galperin, A., Haselton, M. G., Frederick, D. A., et al. (2013). Sexual regret: Evidence for evolved sex differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(7), 1145–1161.Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–587.Google Scholar

Gillath, O., & Collins, T. (2016). Unconscious desire: The affective and motivational aspects of subliminal sexual priming. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(1), 5–20.Google Scholar

Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1985). Sex differences in type of extramarital involvement and marital dissatisfaction. Sex Roles, 12(9–10), 1101–1120.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, D., Telzer, E. H., Lieberman, M. D., Fuligni, A., & Galván, A. (2013). Neural mechanisms of impulse control in sexually risky adolescents. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 23–29.Google Scholar

Guggino, J. M., & Ponzetti, J. J. Jr. (1997). Gender differences in affective reactions to first coitus. Journal of Adolescence, 20(2), 189–200.Google Scholar

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.Google Scholar

Hall, J. L., Stanton, S. J., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2010). Biopsychological and neural processes of implicit motivation. In Schultheiss, O. & Brunstein, J. C., eds., Implicit Motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 279–307.Google Scholar

Hosseini-Kamkar, N., & Morton, J. B. (2014). Sex differences in self-regulation: An evolutionary perspective. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 233.Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S. (1996). Where are the gender differences? Where are the gender similarities? In Buss, D. M. & Malamuth, N. M., eds., Sex, Power, Conflict: Evolutionary and Feminist Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–118.Google Scholar

Janssen, E., & Bancroft, J. (2007). The dual-control model: The role of sexual inhibition and excitation in sexual arousal and behavior. In Janssen, E., ed., The Psychophysiology of Sex. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 197–222.Google Scholar

Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 75–91.Google Scholar

Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 951–969.Google Scholar

Knoth, R., Boyd, K., & Singer, B. (1988). Empirical tests of sexual selection theory: Predictions of sex differences in onset, intensity, and time course of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 73–89.Google Scholar

Knott, V., Impey, D., Fisher, D., Delpero, E., & Fedoroff, P. (2016). Pedophilic brain potential responses to adult erotic stimuli. Brain Research, 1632, 127–140.Google Scholar

Laan, E., & Both, S. (2008). What makes women experience desire? Feminism & Psychology, 18(4), 505–514.Google Scholar

Laan, E., & Janssen, E. (2007). How do men and women feel? Determinants of subjective experience of sexual arousal. In Janssen, E., ed., The Psychophysiology of Sex. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 278–290.Google Scholar

LeDoux, J. (1999). The Emotional Brain. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar

Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 469–496.Google Scholar

Levin, R. J., & van Berlo, W. (2004). Sexual arousal and orgasm in subjects who experience forced or non-consensual sexual stimulation – A review. Journal of Clinical and Forensic Medicine, 11, 82–86.Google Scholar

Lippa, R. A. (2006). Is high sex drive associated with increased sexual attraction to both sexes? It depends on whether you are male or female. Psychological Science, 17(1), 46–52.Google Scholar

Lomanowska, A. M., Lovic, V., Rankine, M. J., et al. (2011). Inadequate early social experience increases the incentive salience of reward-related cues in adulthood. Behavioural Brain Research, 220(1), 91–99.Google Scholar

MacLean, P. D. (1990). The Triune Brain in Evolution. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

McClintock, M. K., & Herdt, G. (1996). Rethinking puberty: The development of sexual attraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(6), 178–183.Google Scholar

McKeague, E. L. (2014). Differentiating the female sex addict: A literature review focused on themes of gender difference used to inform recommendations for treating women with sex addiction. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 21(3), 203–224.Google Scholar

Meana, M. (2010) Elucidating women’s (hetero)sexual desire: Definitional challenges and content expansion. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 104–122.Google Scholar

Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(4), 477–507.Google Scholar

Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F., Ehrhardt, A. A., Rosen, L. R., et al. (1995). Prenatal estrogens and the development of homosexual orientation. Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 12–21.Google Scholar

Money, J. (1986). Lovemaps. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar

Palmer, C. T. (1988). Twelve reasons why rape is not sexually motivated: A skeptical examination. Journal of Sex Research, 25(4), 512–530.Google Scholar

Phillips, B., Hajela, R., & Hilton, D. L. Jr. (2015). Sex addiction as a disease: Evidence for assessment, diagnosis, and response to critics. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 22(2), 167–192.Google Scholar

Pruitt, D., & LaFont, S. (1995). For love and money: Romance tourism in Jamaica. Annals of Tourism Research, 22(2), 422–440.Google Scholar

Pruitt, M. V., & Krull, A. C. (2011). Escort advertisements and male patronage of prostitutes. Deviant Behavior, 32(1), 38–63.Google Scholar

Quinsey, V. L. (2003). The etiology of anomalous sexual preferences in men. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989(1), 105–117.Google Scholar

Rademacher, L., Schulte-Rüther, M., Hanewald, B., & Lammertz, S. (2017). Reward: From basic reinforcers to anticipation of social cues. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, 30, 207–221.Google Scholar

Radtke, S. (2013). Sexual fluidity in women: How feminist research influenced evolutionary studies of same-sex behavior. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7(4), 336–343.Google Scholar

Reynaud, M., Karila, L., Blecha, L., & Benyamina, A. (2010). Is love passion an addictive disorder? American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 36(5), 261–267.Google Scholar

Rubio-Casillas, A., Rodríguez-Quintero, C. M., Rodríguez-Manzo, G., & Fernández-Guasti, A. (2015). Unraveling the modulatory actions of serotonin on male rat sexual responses. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 234–246.Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., Mendle, J., & Markowitz, A. J. (2015). Early childhood maltreatment and girls’ sexual behavior: The mediating role of pubertal timing. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57(3), 342–347.Google Scholar

Schmitt, D. P. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85–104.Google Scholar

Schneider, J. P. (2000). A qualitative study of cybersex participants: Gender differences, recovery issues, and implications for therapists. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7, 249–278.Google Scholar

Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., et al. (2016). The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 103–117.Google Scholar

Snowden, R. J., Curl, C., Jobbins, K., Lavington, C., & Gray, N. S. (2016). Automatic direction of spatial attention to male versus female stimuli: A comparison of heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(4), 843–853.Google Scholar

Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28(1), 78–106.Google Scholar

Symons, D. (1979). The Evolution of Human Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Takahashi, H., Matsuura, M., Yahata, N., et al. (2006). Men and women show distinct brain activations during imagery of sexual and emotional infidelity. NeuroImage, 32(3), 1299–1307.Google Scholar

Telzer, E. H. (2016). Dopaminergic reward sensitivity can promote adolescent health: A new perspective on the mechanism of ventral striatum activation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 57–67.Google Scholar

Thornhill, N. W. (1996). Psychological adaptation to sexual coercion in victims and offenders. In Buss, D. M. & Malamuth, N. M., eds., Sex, Power, Conflict: Evolutionary and Feminist Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 90–104.Google Scholar

Tidwell, N. D., & Eastwick, P. W. (2013). Sex differences in succumbing to sexual temptations: A function of impulse or control? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1620–1633.Google Scholar

Tiefer, L. (1991). Historical, scientific, clinical and feminist criticisms of “the human sexual response cycle” model. Annual Review of Sex Research, 2(1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, N. (1951). The Study of Instinct. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Toates, F. (1986). Motivational Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Toates, F. (2006). A model of the hierarchy of behaviour, cognition, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(1), 75–118.Google Scholar

Toates, F. (2014). How Sexual Desire Works: The Enigmatic Urge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Toates, F. (2017). A hierarchical model might cast some light on the anomaly. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1203–1205.Google Scholar

Tolman, D. L., & Diamond, L. M. (2001). Desegregating sexuality research: Cultural and biological perspectives on gender and desire. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, 33–74.Google Scholar

Townsend, J. M. (1998). What Women Want – What Men Want. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Townsend, J. M., & Wasserman, T. (1997). The perception of sexual attractiveness: Sex differences in variability. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26(3), 243–268.Google Scholar

Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 103–122.Google Scholar

Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013). Disgust: Evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120(1), 65–84.Google Scholar

Victor, E. C., & Hariri, A. R. (2016). A neuroscience perspective on sexual risk behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 28(2), 471–487.Google Scholar

Workman, L., & Reader, W. (2014). Evolutionary Psychology, 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424.Google Scholar

Baschnagel, J. S., & Edlund, J. E. (2016). Affective modification of the startle eyeblink response during sexual and emotional infidelity scripts. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2, 114–122.Google Scholar

Bendixen, M., Kennair, L. E. O., & Buss, D. M. (2015). Jealousy: Evidence of strong sex differences using both forced choice and continuous measure paradigms. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 212–216.Google Scholar

Betzig, L. L. (1986). Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar

Betzig, L. (1989). Causes of conjugal dissolution: A cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology, 30, 654–676.Google Scholar

Betzig, L. (2012). Means, variances, and ranges in reproductive success: Comparative evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 309–317.Google Scholar

Brown, J., Laland, K. N., & Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2009). Bateman’s principles and human sex roles. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 297–304.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (2000). The Dangerous Passion: Why Jealousy Is as Necessary as Love and Sex. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (2003). Sexual strategies: A journey into controversy. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 219–226.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., et al. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5–47.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1999). Jealousy and the nature of beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses about sex differences in the United States, Korea, and Japan. Personal Relationships, 16, 125–150.Google Scholar

Buunk, B. P., Angleitner, A., Oubaid, V., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science, 7, 359–363.Google Scholar

Campbell, A. (2002). A Mind of Her Own: The Evolutionary Psychology of Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cartwright, J. (2008). Evolution and Human Behaviour: Darwinian Perspectives on Human Nature, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 39–55.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Vincent, A. C. J. (1991). Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature, 351, 58–60.Google Scholar

Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 11–27.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

de Souza, A. A. L., Verderane, M. P., Taira, J. T., & Otta, E. (2006). Emotional and sexual jealousy as a function of sex and sexual orientation in a Brazilian sample. Psychological Reports, 98, 529–535.Google Scholar

Del Giudice, M. (2013). Multivariate misgivings: Is D a valid measure of group and sex differences? Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 1067–1076.Google Scholar

Del Giudice, M., Booth, T., & Irwing, P. (2012). The distance between Mars and Venus: Measuring global sex differences in personality. PLoS ONE, 7, e29265.Google Scholar

Dwyer, P. D., & Minnegal, M. (1993). Are Kubo hunters “show-offs”? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 53–70.Google Scholar

Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: A meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226–235.Google Scholar

Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981–993.Google Scholar

Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the paternal investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125–139.Google Scholar

Furze, B., Savy, P., Brym, R. J., & Lie, J., eds. (2011). Sociology in Today’s World, 2nd ed. South Melbourne: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–587.Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). Human sexual selection and developmental stability. In Simpson, J. A. & Kenrick, D. T., eds., Evolutionary Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 169–196.Google Scholar

Geary, D. C., Rumsey, M., Bow-Thomas, C. C., & Hoard, M. K. (1995). Sexual jealousy as a facultative trait: Evidence from the pattern of sex differences in adults from China and the United States. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 355–383.Google Scholar

Geissmann, T. (1993). Evolution of communication in gibbons (Hylobatidae). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Zürich University.Google Scholar

Gettler, L. T., McDade, T. W., Feranil, A. B., & Kuzawa, C. W. (2011). Longitudinal evidence that fatherhood decreases testosterone in human males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 16194–16199.Google Scholar

Gottschall, J., Martin, J., Quish, H., & Rea, J. (2004). Sex differences in mate choice criteria are reflected in folktales from around the world and in historical European literature. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 102–112.Google Scholar

Gould, R. G. (2000). How many children could Moulay Ismail have had? Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 295–296.Google Scholar

Gray, P. B., & Anderson, K. G. (2010). Fatherhood: Evolution and Human Paternal Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Griffith, S. C., Owens, I. P. F., & Thuman, K. A. (2002). Extra pair paternity in birds: A review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2195–2212.Google Scholar

Harman, S. M., Metter, E. J., Tobin, J. D., Pearson, J., & Blackman, M. R. (2001). Longitudinal effects of aging on serum total and free testosterone levels in healthy men. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 86, 724–731.Google Scholar

Harris, C. R. (2013). Humans, deer, and sea dragons: How evolutionary psychology has misconstrued human sex differences. Psychological Inquiry, 24, 195–201.Google Scholar

Hawkes, K. (1991). Showing off: Tests of an hypothesis about men’s foraging goals. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 29–54.Google Scholar

Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Blurton Jones, N. (1989). Hardworking Hadza grandmothers. In Standen, V. & Foley, R., eds., Comparative Socioecology. London: Basil Blackwell, pp. 341–266.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. J. A., & Anglin, J. M. (2003). Facial attractiveness predicts longevity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 303–364.Google Scholar

Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Demographic/Life History of Ache Foragers. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origin of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Huck, M., Fernandez-Duque, E., Babb, P., & Schurr, T. (2014). Correlates of genetic monogamy in socially monogamous mammals: Insights from Azara’s owl monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20140195.Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.Google Scholar

Jankowiak, W., & Fisher, E. (1992). Cross-cultural perspective on romantic love. Ethnology, 31, 149–156.Google Scholar

Kanazawa, S. (2003). Can evolutionary psychology explain reproductive behavior in the contemporary United States? Sociological Quarterly, 44, 291–302.Google Scholar

Kaplan, H. (1994). Evolutionary and wealth flow theories of fertility: Empirical tests and new models. Population and Development Review, 20, 753–791.Google Scholar

Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Zierk, K. L., & Krones, J. M. (1994). Evolution and social cognition: Contrast effects as a function of sex, dominance, and physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 210–217.Google Scholar

Kong, A., Frigge, M. L., Masson, G., et al. (2012). Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk. Nature, 488, 471–475.Google Scholar

Kuhle, B. X. (2011). Did you have sex with him? Do you love her? An in vivo test of sex differences in jealous interrogations. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 1044–1047.Google Scholar

Labuda, D., Lefebvre, J.-F., Nadeau, P., & Roy-Gagnon, M.-H. (2010). Female-to-male breeding ratio in modern humans: An analysis based on historical recombinations. American Journal of Human Genetics, 86, 353–363.Google Scholar

Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947–955.Google Scholar

Lippa, R. A. (2007). The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: An examination of biological and cultural influences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 193–208.Google Scholar

Lippa, R. A. (2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 631–651.Google Scholar

Lishner, D. A., Nguyen, S., Stocks, E. L., & Zillmer, E. J. (2008). Are sexual and emotional infidelity equally upsetting to men and women? Making sense of forced-choice responses. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 667–675.Google Scholar

Marlowe, F. (2000). Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behavioural Processes, 51, 45–61.Google Scholar

Marlowe, F. W. (2003). A critical period for provisioning by Hadza men: Implications for pair bonding. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 217–229.Google Scholar

Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Mate preferences among Hadza hunter–gatherers. Human Nature, 15, 365–376.Google Scholar

Martin, R. D. (1990). Primate Origins and Evolution: A Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McCaughey, M. (2007). The Caveman Mystique: Pop Darwinism and the Debates over Sex, Violence, and Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Miller, G. F. (2000). The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Pawlowski, B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2001). Human mate choice decisions. In Noe, R., Hammerstein, P., & van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M., eds., Economic Models of Human and Animal Behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 187–202.Google Scholar

Pérusse, D. (1993). Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 267–322.Google Scholar

Pietrzak, R., Laird, J. D., Stevens, D. A., & Thompson, N. S. (2002). Sex differences in human jealousy: A coordinated study of forced-choice, continuous rating-scale, and physiological responses on the same subjects. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 83–95.Google Scholar

Reichard, U. H. (2003). Monogamy: Past and present. In Reichard, U. H. & Boesch, C., eds., Monogamy: Mating Strategies and Partnerships in Birds, Humans and Other Mammals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar

Sagarin, B. J., Martin, A. L., Coutinho, S. A., et al. (2012). Sex differences in jealousy: A meta-analytic examination. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 595–614.Google Scholar

Scelza, B. A. (2014). Jealousy in a small-scale, natural fertility population: The roles of paternity, investment and love in jealous response. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 103–108.Google Scholar

Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275.Google Scholar

Schmitt, D. P., & 118 Members of the International Sexuality Description Project (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85–104.Google Scholar

Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.Google Scholar

Shackelford, T. K., & Larsen, R. J. (1997). Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 456–466.Google Scholar

Sprecher, S., Sullivan, Q., & Hatfield, E. (1994). Mate selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1074–1080.Google Scholar

Stewart-Williams, S. (2018). The Ape That Understood the Universe: How the Mind and Culture Evolve. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stewart-Williams, S., Butler, C. A., & Thomas, A. G. (2017). Sexual history and present attractiveness: People want a mate with a bit of a past, but not too much. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 1097–1105.Google Scholar

Stewart-Williams, S., & Thomas, A. G. (2013a). The ape that kicked the hornet’s nest: Response to commentaries on “The Ape That Thought It Was a Peacock.” Psychological Inquiry, 24, 248–271.Google Scholar

Stewart-Williams, S., & Thomas, A. G. (2013b). The ape that thought it was a peacock: Does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences? Psychological Inquiry, 24, 137–168.Google Scholar

Symons, D. (1979). The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B., ed., Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: 1871–1971. Chicago, IL: Aldine Press, pp. 136–179.Google Scholar

Wood, W., & Eagly, A. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.Google Scholar

Billeter, J. C., Atallah, J., Krupp, J. J., Millar, J. G., & Levine, J. D. (2009). Specialized cells tag sexual and species identity in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature, 461(7266), 987–991.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 559–570.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The mate switching hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 143–149.Google Scholar

Byrne, P. G., & Rice, W. R. (2006). Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273(1589), 917–922.Google Scholar

Campbell, L., Chin, K., & Stanton, S. C. (2016). Initial evidence that individuals form new relationships with partners that more closely match their ideal preferences. Collabra, 2(1), 2.Google Scholar

Candolin, U. (2003). The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Reviews, 78(4), 575–595.Google Scholar

Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016a). Do mate preferences influence actual mating decisions? Evidence from computer simulations and three studies of mated couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(1), 53–66.Google Scholar

Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016b). How are mate preferences linked with actual mate selection? Tests of mate preference integration algorithms using computer simulations and actual mating couples. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0156078.Google Scholar

Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2019). Why is age so important in human mating? Evolved age preferences and their influences on multiple mating behaviors. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 127–157.Google Scholar

Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). How sexually dimorphic are human mate preferences? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1082–1093.Google Scholar

Conroy-Beam, D., Goetz, C. D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). What predicts romantic relationship satisfaction and mate retention intensity: Mate preference fulfillment or mate value discrepancies? Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(6), 440–448.Google Scholar

DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L., & Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277(1692), 2405–2410.Google Scholar

Del Giudice, M., Booth, T., & Irwing, P. (2012). The distance between Mars and Venus: Measuring global sex differences in personality. PLoS ONE, 7(1), e29265.Google Scholar

Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 245–264.Google Scholar

Eastwick, P. W., Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., & Hunt, L. L. (2014). The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 623–665.Google Scholar

Farrelly, D., Clemson, P., & Guthrie, M. (2016). Are women’s mate preferences for altruism also influenced by physical attractiveness? Evolutionary Psychology, 14(1), 1–6.Google Scholar

Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 72–89.Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and sociobiology, 14(2), 89–96.Google Scholar

Goetz, C. D., Easton, J. A., Lewis, D. M., & Buss, D. M. (2012). Sexual exploitability: Observable cues and their link to sexual attraction. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 417–426.Google Scholar

Gottschall, J., Martin, J., Quish, H., & Rea, J. (2004). Sex differences in mate choice criteria are reflected in folktales from around the world and in historical European literature. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 102–112.Google Scholar

Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1995). Men’s and women’s preferences in marital partners in the United States, Russia, and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(6), 728–750.Google Scholar

Hill, R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37, 554–558.Google Scholar

Keller, M. C., Garver-Apgar, C. E., Wright, M. J., et al. (2013). The genetic correlation between height and IQ: Shared genes or assortative mating? PLoS Genetics, 9(4), e1003451.Google Scholar

Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 75–91.Google Scholar

Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58(1), 97–116.Google Scholar