Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I The Comparative Approach
- Part II Sociocultural Anthropology and Evolution
- Part III Evolution and Neuroscience
- Part IV Group Living
- Part V Evolution and Cognition
- Part VI Evolution and Development
- 21 Evolutionary Developmental Psychology
- 22 The Ontogeny and Evolution of Cooperation
- 23 Genomic Imprinting Is Critical for Understanding the Development and Adaptive Design of Psychological Mechanisms in Humans and Other Animals
- 24 Evolutionary Explanations for Bullying Behavior
- 25 Birth Order and Evolutionary Psychology
- Part VII Sexual Selection and Human Sex Differences
- Part VIII Abnormal Behavior and Evolutionary Psychopathology
- Part IX Applying Evolutionary Principles
- Part X Evolution and the Media
- Index
- References
23 - Genomic Imprinting Is Critical for Understanding the Development and Adaptive Design of Psychological Mechanisms in Humans and Other Animals
from Part VI - Evolution and Development
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I The Comparative Approach
- Part II Sociocultural Anthropology and Evolution
- Part III Evolution and Neuroscience
- Part IV Group Living
- Part V Evolution and Cognition
- Part VI Evolution and Development
- 21 Evolutionary Developmental Psychology
- 22 The Ontogeny and Evolution of Cooperation
- 23 Genomic Imprinting Is Critical for Understanding the Development and Adaptive Design of Psychological Mechanisms in Humans and Other Animals
- 24 Evolutionary Explanations for Bullying Behavior
- 25 Birth Order and Evolutionary Psychology
- Part VII Sexual Selection and Human Sex Differences
- Part VIII Abnormal Behavior and Evolutionary Psychopathology
- Part IX Applying Evolutionary Principles
- Part X Evolution and the Media
- Index
- References
Summary
Genomic imprinting is genotype-independent parent-of-origin gene expression. It is a well-understood example of epigenetic inheritance, as the environment (i.e., whether a gene resided in the egg or sperm in the previous generation) leaves a reversible mark on offspring DNA. These marks are erased when the offspring produces its own gametes (i.e., sperm or egg), so that new parent-of-origin marks can be placed. The phenotypic effects of imprinted genes are significant, especially in terms of growth and neurobiology. Imprinted genes are rare in mammalian genomes, but here I make the case for the idea that they are critically important for our understanding of how natural selection shaped functional adaptations. There are approximately 100 imprinted genes in humans that have differentially methylated regions by parent of origin. The effects of imprinted genes are species, isoform (i.e., alternative transcripts), tissue, and developmentally dependent.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Abramowitz, L. K., & Bartolomei, M. S. (2012). Genomic imprinting: Recognition and marking of imprinted loci. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, 22, 72–8.Google Scholar
Bassel-Duby, R., & Olson, E. N. (2006). Signaling pathways in skeletal muscle remodeling. Annual Reviews Biochemistry, 75, 19–37.Google Scholar
Bernal, A. J., Dolinoy, D. C., Huang, D., et al. (2013). Adaptive radiation-induced epigenetic alterations mitigated by antioxidants. FASEB Journal, 27(2), 665–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, W. M. (2001). Genomic imprinting and the cognitive architecture mediating human culture. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1, 251–58.Google Scholar
Brown, W. M. (2011). The parental antagonism theory of language evolution: Preliminary evidence for the proposal. Human Biology, 83(2), 213–245.Google Scholar
Brown, W. M. (2015). Exercise-associated DNA methylation change in skeletal muscle and the importance of imprinted genes: A bioinformatics meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(24), 1567–1578.Google Scholar
Brown, W. M. (2018). Conflict within: The epigenetics of troubled sleep. Clinical Psychiatry, 4, 24.Google Scholar
Brown, W. M., & Consedine, N. S. (2004). Just how happy is the happy puppet? An emotion signalling and kinship theory perspective on the behavioral phenotype of children with Angelman syndrome. Medical Hypotheses, 63, 377–385.Google Scholar
Brown, W. M., & Olding, R. J. (2017). Epigenetic-based hormesis and age-dependent altruism: Additions to the behavioural constellation of deprivation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e320.Google Scholar
Brown, W. M., Consedine, N. S., & Magai, C. (2005). Altruism relates to health in an ethnically diverse sample of older adults. Journals of Gerontology, 60B(3), 143–152.Google Scholar
Bruni, O., Ferri, R., Dagostino, G., et al. (2004). Sleep disturbances in Angelman syndrome: A questionnaire study. Brain and Development, 26(4), 233–240.Google Scholar
Buiting, K. (2010). Prader–Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 154C(3), 365–376.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Chalk, T. E. W., & Brown, W. M. (2014). Exercise epigenetics and the fetal origins of disease. Epigenomics, 6(5), 469–472.Google Scholar
Cruickshanks, H. A., & Tufarelli, C. (2009). Isolation of cancer-specific chimeric transcripts induced by hypomethylation of the LINE-1 antisense promoter. Genomics, 94(6), 397–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dauber, A., Cunha-Silva, M., Macedo, D. B., et al. (2017). Paternally inherited DLK1 deletion associated with familial central precocious puberty. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 102(5), 1557–1567.Google Scholar
Deaton, A. M., & Bird, A. (2011). CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes & Development, 25(10), 1010–1022.Google Scholar
Dent, C. L., & Isles, A. R. (2014). Brain-expressed imprinted genes and adult behaviour: The example of Nesp and Grb10. Mammalian Genome, 25(1–2), 87–93.Google Scholar
Eggermann, T. (2009). Silver–Russell and Beckwith–Wiedemann syndromes: Opposite (epi)mutations in 11p15 result in opposite clinical pictures. Hormone Research in Paediatrics, 71(2), 30–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faria, G. S., Varela, S. A., & Gardner, A. (2017). Sexual selection modulates genetic conflicts and patterns of genomic imprinting. Evolution, 71(3), 526–40.Google Scholar
Gillman, A. S., Gardiner, C. K., Koljack, C. E., & Bryan, A. D. (2018). Body mass index, diet, and exercise: Testing possible linkages to breast cancer risk via DNA methylation. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 168(1), 241–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gluckman, P. D., Hanson, M. A., Buklijas, T., Low, F. M., & Beedle, A. S. (2009). Epigenetic mechanisms that underpin metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 5(7), 401–408.Google Scholar
Haig, D. (1993). Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy. Quarterly Review of Biology, 68(4), 495–532.Google Scholar
Haig, D. (2000). Genomic imprinting, sex-biased dispersal, and social behavior. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 907(1), 149–163.Google Scholar
Haig, D. (2002). Genomic Imprinting and Kinship. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Haig, D. (2003). On intrapersonal reciprocity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 418–425.Google Scholar
Haig, D. (2010). Transfers and transitions: Parent–offspring conflict, genomic imprinting, and the evolution of human life history. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(Suppl. 1), 1731–1735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haig, D., & Wharton, R. (2003). Prader–Willi syndrome and the evolution of human childhood. American Journal of Human Biology, 15(3), 320–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, W. D. (1987). Discriminating nepotism: Expectable, common, overlooked. In Fletcher, D. J. C & Michener, C. D, eds., Kin Recognition in Animals. New York: Wiley, pp. 417–438. Reprinted in Hamilton, W. D. (2001). Narrow Roads of Gene Land: Volume 2, Evolution of Sex. Oxford: W.H. Freeman, pp. 345–366.Google Scholar
Horvath, S. (2013). DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biology, 14(10), R115.Google Scholar
Horvath, S. (2015). Erratum to: DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biology, 16, 96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hupkes, M., Jonsson, M. K., Scheenen, W. J., et al. (2011). Epigenetics: DNA demethylation promotes skeletal myotube maturation. FASEB Journal, 25(11), 3861–3872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kong, A., Steinthorsdottir, V., Masson, G., et al. (2009). Parental origin of sequence variants associated with complex diseases. Nature, 462(7275), 868–874.Google Scholar
Mackay, D. J., & Temple, I. K. (2010). Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus type 1. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 154C(3), 335–342.Google Scholar
Maeda, T., Oyama, J., Higuchi, Y., et al. (2011). The physical ability of Japanese female elderly with cerebrovascular disease correlates with the telomere length and subtelomeric methylation status in their peripheral blood leukocytes. Gerontology, 57(2), 137–143.Google Scholar
McNamara, P. (2014). Comment on David Haig’s troubled sleep: Implications for functions of infant sleep. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health, 2014(1), 54–56.Google Scholar
Mehr, S. A., Kotler, J., Howard, R. M., Haig, D., & Krasnow, M. M. (2017). Genomic imprinting is implicated in the psychology of music. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1455–1467.Google Scholar
Micheletti, A. J., Ruxton, G. D., & Gardner, A. (2017). Intrafamily and intragenomic conflicts in human warfare. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1849), 201z2699.Google Scholar
Monk, D., Arnaud, P., Frost, J., et al. (2009). Reciprocal imprinting of human GRB10 in placental trophoblast and brain: Evolutionary conservation of reversed allelic expression. Human Molecular Genetics, 18(16), 3066–3074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales-Lara, D., De-La-Peña, C., & Murillo-Rodríguez, E. (2018). Dad’s snoring may have left molecular scars in your DNA: The emerging role of epigenetics in sleep disorders. Molecular Neurobiology, 55(4), 2713–2724.Google Scholar
Morison, I. M. (2001). The imprinted gene and parent-of-origin effect database. Nucleic Acids Research, 29(1), 275–276.Google Scholar
Murphy, S. K. (2006). Callipyge mutation affects gene expression in cis: A potential role for chromatin structure. Genome Research, 16(3), 340–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S. S., Skaar, D. A., Jirtle, R. L., & Hoyo, C. (2017). Epigenetics, obesity and early-life cadmium or lead exposure. Epigenomics, 9(1), 57–75.Google Scholar
Pepper, G. V., & Nettle, D. (2017). The behavioural constellation of deprivation: Causes and consequences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e346.Google Scholar
Portela, A., & Esteller, M. (2010). Epigenetic modifications and human disease. Nature Biotechnology, 28(10), 1057–1068.Google Scholar
SanMiguel, J. M., & Bartolomei, M. S. (2018). DNA methylation dynamics of genomic imprinting in mouse development. Biology of Reproduction, 99, 252–262.Google Scholar
Santos, L., Elliott-Sale, K. J., & Sale, C. (2017). Exercise and bone health across the lifespan. Biogerontology, 18(6), 931–946.Google Scholar
Small, K. S., Hedman, Å. K., Grundberg, E., et al. (2011). Identification of an imprinted master trans regulator at the KLF14 locus related to multiple metabolic phenotypes. Nature Genetics, 43(6), 561–564.Google Scholar
Sone, S. (1994). Muscle histochemistry in the Prader–Willi syndrome. Brain & Development, 16, 183–188.Google Scholar
Swartz, J. R., Hariri, A. R., & Williamson, D. E. (2017). An epigenetic mechanism links socioeconomic status to changes in depression-related brain function in high-risk adolescents. Molecular Psychiatry, 22, 209–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, S. M., & Jones, P. A. (1979). Multiple new phenotypes induced in 10T1/2 and 3T3 cells treated with 5-azacytidine. Cell, 17, 771–779.Google Scholar
Tucci, V. (2016). Genomic imprinting: A new epigenetic perspective of sleep regulation. PLoS Genetics, 12(5), e1006004.Google Scholar
Ubeda, F., & Gardner, A. (2011). A model for genomic imprinting in the social brain: Adults. Evolution, 65, 462–475.Google Scholar
Waterland, R. A., & Jirtle, R. L. (2003). Transposable elements: Targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 23(15), 5293–5300.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. M., & Rotwein, P. (2006). Control of MyoD function during Initiation of muscle differentiation by an autocrine signaling pathway activated by insulin-like growth factor-II. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 281(40), 29962–29971.Google Scholar
Zeng, H., Irwin, M. L., Lu, L., et al. (2012). Physical activity and breast cancer survival: An epigenetic link through reduced methylation of a tumor suppressor gene L3MBTL1. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 133(1), 127–135.Google Scholar