Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:20:35.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Educational Justice and Democratic Education

from Part Three - Key Topics and Concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2023

By
Stefan Gosepath
Edited by
Julian Culp ,
Johannes Drerup  and
Douglas Yacek
Julian Culp
Affiliation:
The American University of Paris, France
Johannes Drerup
Affiliation:
Universität Dortmund
Douglas Yacek
Affiliation:
Universität Dortmund
Get access

Summary

This chapter offers an overview of some of the more important approaches to these questions in contemporary, mostly anglophone, conceptions of educational justice in primary and secondary education. Section 16.2 starts with some provisions of some important goals of education. Section 16.3 turns to educational justice in general. Section 16.4 asks about the spheres of educational justice: is it education and socialization in general, or the school system in particular? Section 16.5 distinguishes three different levels of education: basic education for all; the cultivation of individual talents and capacities; and selection for higher education and the job market. Section 16.6 outlines the differences between five principles of justice and equality in the field of education: strict equality; a conception of fair equality of opportunity, iii) a conception of luck-egalitarian equality of opportunity; iv) a prioritarian conception of educational justice; and democratic adequacy as a conception of educational justice.

Keywords

educational justicetalentsfair equality of opportunityluck-egalitarian equalityprioritarianismadequacyspheres of educational justicesocial background
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Democratic Education , pp. 263 - 280
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, E. (1999). What is the point of equality? Ethics, 109, 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (2004). Rethinking equality of opportunity: Comment on Adam Swift’s how not to be a hypocrite. Theory and Research in Education, 2(2), 99–110.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2007). Fair opportunity in education: A democratic equality perspective. Ethics, 117(4), 595–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (2010). The imperative of education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. (1989). Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies, 56, 77–93.Google Scholar
Brighouse, H. (2000). School choice and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2009). Educational equality versus educational adequacy: A critique of Anderson and Satz. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 26(2), 117–28.Google Scholar
Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2014a). The place of educational equality in educational justice. In Meyer, K., ed., Education, justice and the human good. Fairness and equality in the educational system. London: Routledge, 14–33.Google Scholar
Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2014b). Family values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1989). On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics, 99, 906–44.Google Scholar
Culp, J. (2019). Democratic education in a globalized world. A normative theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Culp, J. (2020a). Bildung und Gerechtigkeit. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 74(2), 296–309.Google Scholar
Culp, J. (2020b). Educational justice. Philosophy Compass. e12713. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12713.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. ([1916/1980). Democracy and Education. In Boydston, J. A., ed., The Middle Works, 1899–1924, vol. 9 of the collected works of John Dewey. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 1882–953.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign virtue. The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J. (1983). Justice, equal opportunity, and the family. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fourie, C., Schuppert, F., & Wallimann-Helmer, I. (Eds.) (2015). Social equality: On what it means to be equals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1987). Equality as a moral ideal. Ethics 98, 21–42.Google Scholar
Gosepath, S. (2004). Gleiche Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Gosepath, S. (2014). What exactly does equality in education mean? In Meyer, K., ed., Education, justice, and the human good. Fairness and equality in the education system. Oxford/New York: Routledge, pp. 100–12.Google Scholar
Gosepath, S. (2015). The principles and the presumption of equality. In C. Fourie, F. Schuppert,, I. Wallimann-Helmer, (eds.), Social equality: On what it means to be equals, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 167–85.Google Scholar
Gosepath, S. (2021). Equality. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Edward N. Zalta, ed., https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/equality.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jencks, C. (1988). Whom must we treat equally for educational opportunity to be equal? Ethics, 98, 518–33.Google Scholar
Kotzee, B. (2013). Educational justice, epistemic justice, and leveling down. Educational Theory, 63(4), 331–49.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rassmussen, K. (2013). Born free and equal? A philosophical inquiry into the nature of discrimination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. (2009). Bildung. Berlin: de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (1997). Equality and justice. Ratio, 10, 222–37.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1992). Human functioning and social justice. In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory, 20, 202–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olsaretti, S. (ed.) (2003). Desert and justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1997). Equality and priority. Ratio, 10, 202–21.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Plato, . (380 BCE/ 1991). The Republic. 2nd ed., New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pojman, L. P. & McLeod, O. (eds.) (1998). What do we deserve? A reader on justice and desert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rakowski, E. (1991). Equal justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. 2nd rev. ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reich, R. (2013). Equality, adequacy, and K-12 education. In Allen, D. and Reich, R., eds., Education, justice and democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 43–61.Google Scholar
Satz, D. (2007). Equality, adequacy, and education for citizenship. Ethics, 117, 623–48.Google Scholar
Schemmel, C. (2011). Why relational egalitarians should care about distributions. Social Theory and Practice, 37, 365–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schemmel, C. (2021). Justice and egalitarian relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, F. (2000). Grundzüge der Erziehungskunst (Vorlesung 1826). In Winkler, M. and Brachmann, J., eds., Schleiermacher, Texte zur Pädagogik. Kommentierte Studienausgabe Bd. 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Schouten, G. (2012). Fair educational opportunity and the distribution of natural ability: Toward a prioritarian principle of educational justice. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 46(3), 472–91.Google Scholar
Stojanov, K. (2016). Social justice and education as discursive initiation. Educational Theory, 66(6), 755–67.Google Scholar
Temkin, L. (1993). Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tooley, J. (1996). Education without the state. London: IEAGoogle Scholar
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. A defence of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1973). Problems of the self. Philosophical papers 1956–1972. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×