Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G. A., Tangirala, S., & Oakley, J. L. (2006). Information privacy in organizations: Empowering creative and extrarole performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Amabile, T. M. (1982). The social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1929/1984). Problems in Dostoevsky’s poetics, ed. and trans. Emerson, Caryl. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Barron, F. & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications (2nd edn). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Burkhardt, J.-M. & Lubart, T. (2010). Creativity in the age of emerging technology. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Çelik, P., Storme, M., & Forthmann, B. (2016). A new perspective on the link between multiculturalism and creativity: The relationship between core value diversity and divergent thinking. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, S. K.-C., Bond, M. H., Spencer-Oatey, H., & Rojo-Laurilla, M. (2004). Culture and rapport promotion in service encounters: Protecting the ties that bind. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 14(2), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, J. H., Hsu, C. C., Shih, N. H., & Chen, H. C. (2014). Multicultural families and creative children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(8), 1288–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, C., Kasof, J. Himsel, A. J., Greenberger, E., Dong, Q., & Xue, G. (2002). Creativity in drawings of geometric shapes: A cross-cultural examination with the consensual assessment technique. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, X., Leung, A. K. Y., Yang, D. Y. J., Chiu, C. Y., Li, Z. Q., & Cheng, S. Y. (2016). Cultural threats in culturally mixed encounters hamper creative performance for individuals with lower openness to experience. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(10), 1321–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheung, C.-K. & Yue, X. D. (2007). Which Chinese creators are famous and why: Views from Hong Kong and Mainland Chinese students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(3), 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J., & Leong, F. T. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66(7), 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chua, R. Y., Roth, Y., & Lemoine, J. F. (2015). The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(2), 189–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, A. & Erlich, S. (2015). Individual values, psychological contracts, and innovative work behavior: A comparison between employees from Israel and India, Business Creativity and the Creative Economy, 1(1), 61–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Colligan, J. (1983). Musical creativity and social rules in four cultures. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 8(1), 39–47Google Scholar

Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.). (2010). The dark side of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. (ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325–339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

de Vries, H., Kirsch, C. J., & Furnham, A. (2014). Cultural differences in creativity: The role of immigration. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 2(2), 41–52.Google Scholar

de Vries, H. & Lubart, T. (2017). Scientific creativity: Divergent and convergent thinking and the impact of culture. Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi-org.frodon.univ-paris5.fr/10.1002/jocb.184Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Dijksterhuis, A. & Meurs, T. (2006). Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(1), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gacheru, M., Opiyo, M., & Smutny, J. F. (1999). Children’s creative thinking in Kenya. Childhood Education, 75(6), 346–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaggioli, A., Mazzoni, E., Milani, L., & Riva, G. (2015). The creative link: Investigating the relationship between social network indices, creative performance and flow in blended teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Thinking through creativity and culture: An integrated model. New Jersey, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). On units of analysis and creativity theory: Towards a “molecular” perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (ed.) (2016). The Palgrave handbook of creativity and culture research. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P., Gillespie, A., & Valsiner, J. (eds.). (2015). Rethinking creativity: Perspectives from cultural psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. & Lubart, T. (2018). Cultural differences in creative professional domains. In Leung, A. K.-y., Kwan, L. Y.-Y., & Liou, S. (eds.), Handbook of culture and creativity: Basic processes and applied innovations (pp. 123–141). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Godart, F. C., Maddux, W. W., Shipilov, A. V., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Fashion with a foreign flair: Professional experiences abroad facilitate the creative innovations of organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, G. P. & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.). (2015). Video games & creativity. New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruber, H. (2005). The creative person as a whole: The evolving systems approach to the study of creative work. In Gruber, E. & Bödeker, K. (eds.), Creativity, psychology and the history of science (pp. 35–104). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guegan, J., Nelson, J., & Lubart, T. (2017). The relationship between contextual cues in virtual environments and creative processes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(3), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0503CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Güss, C. D., Tuason, M. T., Göltenboth, N., & Mironova, A. (2017). Creativity through the eyes of professional artists in Cuba, Germany, and Russia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(2), 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrington, J. R. & Gelfand, M. J. (2014). Tightness–looseness across the 50 United States. PNAS Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(22), 7990–7995. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317937111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hartog, F. (1988). The mirror of Herodotus: The representation of the other in the writing of history  (Series No. 5). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

He, J. & Van de Vijver, F. J. (2013). A general response style factor: Evidence from a multi-ethnic study in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(7), 794–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 903–918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofstede, G. & Jan, H. G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Fischer, R., & Christoffels, I. K. (2011). Bilingualism and creativity: Benefits in convergent thinking come with losses in divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00273CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

House, R. J. & Javidan, M. (2004). Overview of GLOBE. In House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javian, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (eds.), Leadership, culture and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 9–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Jahoda, G. (1993). Crossroads between culture and mind: Continuities and change in theories of human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jung, D. D., Wu, A., & Chow, C. W. (2008). Towards understanding the direct and indirect effects of CEOs’ transformational leadership on firm innovation. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 582–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karakaya, A. F. & Demirkan, H. (2015). Collaborative digital environments to enhance the creativity of designers. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karwowski, M. & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (2004). The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 14(2), 15–25.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Do people recognize the four Cs? Examining layperson conceptions of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The international handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khaleefa, O. H., Erdos, G., & Ashria, I. H. (1996). Creativity in an indigenous Afro-Arab Islamic culture: The case of Sudan. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 268–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kharkhurin, A. V. (2008). The effects of linguistic proficiency, age of second language acquisition, and length of exposure to a new cultural environment on bilinguals’ divergent thinking. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kharkhurin, A. V. (2009). The role of bilingualism in creative performance on divergent thinking and Invented Aliens creativity tests. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(1), 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kharkhurin, A. V. (2010). Sociocultural differences in the relationship between bilingualism and creative potential. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(5–6), 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110361777CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kharkhurin, A. V. & Altarriba, J. (2016). The effect of mood induction and language of testing on bilingual creativity. Bilingualism: Language And Cognition, 19(5), 1079–1094. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000528CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kharkhurin, A. V. & Motalleebi, S. N. S. (2008). The impact of culture on the creative potential of American, Russian and Iranian college students. Creativity Research Journal, 20(4), 404–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kharkhurin, A. V. & Wei, L. (2015). The role of code-switching in bilingual creativity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(2), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, K. H. (2007). Exploring the interactions between Asian culture (Confucianism) and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(1), 28–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambert, W. E. (1981). Bilingualism and language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379(1), 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leung, A. K. & Chiu, C.-y. (2010). Multicultural experience, idea receptiveness, and creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 723–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leung, A. K., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity. American Psychologist, 63(3), 169–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Li, J. (1997). Creativity in horizontal and vertical domains. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2–3), 107–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubart, T. I. (1990). Creativity and cross-cultural variation, International Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.) Handbook of creativity (pp. 339–350). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lubart, T. I. (2005). How can computers be partners in the creative process? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 63, 365–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ludwig, A.M. (1992). Culture and creativity. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 46(3), 454–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maddux, W. W., Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). When in Rome … Learn why the Romans do what they do: How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(6), 731–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210367786CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mead, M. (1935). Sex and temperament in three savage societies. New York: W. Morrow & Co.Google Scholar

Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Minkov, M., Bond, M. H., & Blagoev, V. (2015). Do different national samples yield similar dimensions of national culture?. Cross Cultural Management, 22(2), 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minkov, M. & Hofstede, G. (2012). Is national culture a meaningful concept? Cultural values delineate homogeneous national clusters of in-country regions. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(2), 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minkov, M. & Hofstede, G. (2014). Clustering of 316 European regions on measures of values: Do Europe’s countries have national cultures? Cross-Cultural Research, 48(2), 144–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minkov, M. & Hofstede, G. (2014). Nations versus religions: Which has a stronger effect on societal values? Management International Review, 54(6), 801–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montuori, A. & Purser, R. E. (1995). Deconstructing the lone Genius myth: Toward a contextual view of creativity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 35(3), 69–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mpofu, E., Myambo, K., Mogaji, A. A., Mashego, T.-A., & Khaleefa, O. H. (2006). African perspectives on creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The international handbook of creativity (pp. 456–489). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Necka, E., Grohman, M., & Slabosz, A. (2006). Creativity studies in Poland. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The international handbook of creativity (pp. 270–306). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ng, A. K. (2001). Why Asians are less creative than westerners. Singapore: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Ng, A. K. (2003). A cultural model of creative and conforming behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niu, W. & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Creativity in troubled times: Factors associated with recognitions of Chinese literary creativity in the 20th century. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(1), 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niu, W. & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36(4), 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niu, W. & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Contemporary studies on the concept of creativity: The East and the West. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niu, W. & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Societal and school influence on students’ creativity. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oral, G. (2006). Creativity in Turkey and Turkish-speaking countries. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R.J. (eds.), The international handbook of creativity (pp. 337–373). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paletz, S. B. F. & Peng, K. (2008). Implicit theories of creativity across cultures: Novelty and appropriateness in two product domains. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(3), 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Puccio, G. & Chimento, M. D. (2001). Implicit theories of creativity: Laypersons’ perceptions of the creativity of adaptors and innovators. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 675–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(4), 518–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–311.Google Scholar

Ricciardelli, L. A. (1992). Creativity and bilingualism. Journal of Creative Behavior, 26, 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rinne, T., Steel, G. D., & Fairweather, J. (2012). Hofstede and Shane revisited: The role of power distance and individualism in national-level innovation success. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(2), 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rostan, S. M., Pariser, D., & Gruber, H. E. (2002). A cross-cultural study of the development of artistic talent, creativity and giftedness. High Ability Studies, 13(2), 125–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudowicz, E. (2003). Creativity and culture: A two-way interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudowicz, E. & Hui, A. (1998). Hong Kong people’s views of creativity. Gifted Education International, 13(2), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saad, C. S., Damian, R. I., Benet-Martínez, V., Moons, W. G., & Robins, R. W. (2013). Multiculturalism and creativity: Effects of cultural context, bicultural identity, and ideational fluency. Social Psychological And Personality Science, 4(3), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612456560CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saeki, N., Fan, X., & Dusen, L. (2001). A comparative study of creative thinking of American and Japanese college students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(1), 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sawyer, R. K. (2006 ). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shane, S. (1992). Why do some societies invent more than others?. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(1), 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shane, S. (1993). Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shane, S., Venkataraman, S., & MacMillan, I. (1995). Cultural differences in innovation championing strategies. Journal of Management, 21(5), 931–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shostak, M. (1993). The creative individual in the world of the !Kung San. In Lavie, S., Narrayan, K., & Ronaldo, R. (eds.), Creativity/anthropology (pp. 54–69). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Shweder, R. (1990). Cultural psychology: What is it? In Stigler, J., Shweder, R., & Herdt, G. (eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 1–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 1119–1133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity and leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed). Handbook of creativity (pp. 116–133). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2008). Bilingualism and creativity. In Altarriba, J. & Heredia, R. R. (eds.), An introduction to bilingualism: Principles and processes (pp. 147–166). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Smith, P. B. (2004). Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(1), 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soveri, A., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Laine, M. (2011). Is there a relationship between language switching and executive functions in bilingualism? Introducing a within-group analysis approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 138, 1–8.Google Scholar

Sporton, G. (2015). Digital creativity: Something from nothing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Storme, M., Celik, P., Camargo, A., Forthmann, B., Holling, H., & Lubart, T. (2017). The effect of forced language switching during divergent thinking: A study on bilinguals’ originality of ideas. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(2086) doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02086CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P. E., & Streufert, S. (1992). Conceptual/integrative complexity. In Smith, C. P., Atkinson, J. W., McClelland, D. C., & Veroff, J. (eds.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 393–400). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tadmor, C. T., Tetlock, P. E., & Peng, K. (2009). Acculturation strategies and integrative complexity the cognitive implications of biculturalism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(1), 105–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of culture’s consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Therivel, W. A. (1995). Long-term effect of power on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 8(2), 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creativity thinking. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.Google Scholar

Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behaviour. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Triandis, H. C. (2007). Culture and psychology: A history of the study of their relationship. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. (2015). Methodological aspects of cross-cultural research. In Gelfand, M. J., Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. (eds), Handbook of advances in culture and psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 101–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. & Poortinga, Y. H. (2002). Structural equivalence in multilevel research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(2), 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J., Van Hemert, D. A., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2015). Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures. Hove: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Everdingen, Y. M. & Waarts, E. (2003). The effect of national culture on the adoption of innovations. Marketing Letters, 14(3), 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1930/1998). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Soviet Psychology, 28 (10), 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walton, A. P. (2014). The individual versus the group: A unique approach to the origins of creativity. Creativity in Business. Research Papers on Knowledge, Innovation and Enterprise, 2, 94–110.Google Scholar

Ward, T. B. & Sonneborn, M. S. (2009). Creative expression in virtual worlds: Imitation, imagination, and individualized collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(4), 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westwood, R. & Low, D. R. (2003). The multicultural muse: Culture, creativity and innovation. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3(2), 235–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, C.-C., Chen, F.-Y., Kuo, C.-H., Lin, W.-W., Liu, S.-H., & Chen, Y.-H. (1999). The newly developed creative thinking test: A research report for the ministry of education’s six-year student counseling program. Taipei, Taiwan: Foundation for Scholarly Exchange.Google Scholar

Wursten, H. & Jacobs, C. (2013). The impact of culture on education. The Hofstede Centre, ITIM International.Google Scholar

Ye, T. & RobertJr, L. P. (2017). Does collectivism inhibit individual creativity?: The effects of collectivism and perceived diversity on individual creativity and satisfaction in virtual ideation teams. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 2344–2358). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zagalo, N. & Branco, P. (eds.). (2015). Creativity in the digital age. London: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, R. S. & Runco, M. A. (1999). A history of research on creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 16–31). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The social psychology of creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baer, J. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baer, J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berthrong, J. H. (1998). Transformations of the Confucian way. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Bhargava, P. M. & Chakrabarty, C. (1996). Interplay of science, creativity, beauty, nature and evolution. In K. C. Gupta (ed.), Aesthetics and motivations in arts and science (pp. 66–84). New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts.Google Scholar

Chan, D. W. & Chan, L. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers’ perceptions of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cho, Y., Chung, H. Y., Choi, K. & Suh, Y., & Seo, C. (2011). The creativity of Korean leaders and its implications for creativity education. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drewsen, B. T., Kirstine, L., & Maaloe, J. (2014). Implicit theories of the personality of the ideal creative employee. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and Arts, 8(2), 189–197.Google Scholar

Fleith, D. S. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554022CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, H. (1989). The key in the slot: Creativity in a Chinese key. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 23(1), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, H. (1996). The creators’ patterns. In Boden, M. A. (ed.). Dimensions of creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Is the light bulb still on? Social representations of creativity in Western context. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 21, 53–72.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). From dichotomous to relational thinking in the psychology of creativity: A review of great debates. Creativity and Leisure: An Intercultural and Cross-disciplinary Journal, 1, 83–97.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P., Gillespie, A., & Valsiner, J. (eds.). (2014). Rethinking creativity: Contributions from social and cultural psychology. Hove and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. & Karwowski, M. (2013). Joining the debate: Creativity seen from Eastern and Central Europe. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 23(1), 5–11.Google Scholar

Glück, J., Ernst, R., & Unger, F. (2002). How creatives define creativity: Definitions reflect different types of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1401_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hojbotă, A.-M. (2013). Naïve theories of creativity and sociocultural factors revisited. The potential explanatory role of creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 23(1), 25–38.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kapur, R., Subramanyam, S., & Shah, A. (1997). Creativity in Indian Science. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9(2), 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kőváry, Z. (2013). Matricide and creativity. The case of two Hungarian cousin writers from the perspective of contemporary psychobiography. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving.Google Scholar

Lebuda, I., Wiśniewska, E., & Galewska-Kustra, M. (2013). Educator of creativity on the Polish job market: The analysis of professional experiences of Psychopedagogy of Creativity graduates. International Journal of Creativity and Problem SolvingGoogle Scholar

Lee, H., Kim, J., Ryu, Y., & Song, S. (2015). Do people use their implicit theories of creativity as general theories? Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(2), 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lim, W. & Plucker, J. A. (2001). Creativity through a lens of social responsibility: Implicit theories of creativity with Korean samples. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubart, T. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 339–350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lubart, T. I. & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Creativity across time and place: Life span and cross-cultural perspective. High Ability Studies, 9, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackey, C. (2015). Synchronicity: Empower your life with the gift of coincidence. London: Watkins Publishing.Google Scholar

Majumdar, C. K. (1996). Creativity in science. In K. C. Gupta (ed.), Aesthetics and motivations in arts and science (pp. 27–34). New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts.Google Scholar

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Misra, G., Srivastava, A. K., & Misra, I. (2006). Culture and facets of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The international handbook of creativity (pp. 421–455). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muneyoshi, H. & Kagawa, Y. (2004). Implicit versus explicit theories of creativity: East versus west. Poster session presented at the 6th student research and creativity celebration, State University College at Buffalo.Google Scholar

Nemeržitski, S. (2017). Implicit theories of creativity of secondary school students from Estonia and Russia: Effects of collectivism, individualism, and a bilingual educational environment. Creativity Research Journal, 29(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1263510CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niu, W. (2012). Confucian ideology and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(4), 274–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niu, W. (2015). Chinese creativity: Past, present, and future. In Kakar, S. & Blamberger, G. (eds.), On creativity. London: Penguin Group.Google Scholar

Niu, W. & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Creativity of Chinese and American: A synthetic analysis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niu, W. & Liu, D. (2009). Enhancing creativity: A comparison between effects of an indicative instruction to be creative and a more elaborate heuristic instruction on Chinese student creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niu, W. & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Contemporary studies on the concept of creativity: The east and the west. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niu, W. & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The philosophical roots of western and eastern conceptions of creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 26, 1001–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niu, W. & Zhou, J. Z. (2010). Creativity in Chinese mathematics classrooms. In R. Beghetto & J. Kaufman (eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 270–288). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niu, W., Zhou, Z., & Zhou, X. (2017). Understanding Chinese approach to teaching creatively in mathematics classroom. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 49, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0887-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nowacki, B. (2013). Western model of creativity: Generalizability and hypothetical educational consequences for the “non-western world.” International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 23(1), 13–20.Google Scholar

Paletz, S. B. F. & Peng, K. (2008). Implicit theories of creativity across cultures: Novelty and appropriateness in two product domains. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paletz, S. B. F., Peng, K. & Li, S. (2011). In the world or in the head: External and internal theories of creativity, Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panda, M. & Yadava, R. (2005). Implicit creativity theories in India: exploration. Psychological Studies, 50(1), 32–39.Google Scholar

Pavlović, J., Maksić, S., & Bodroža, B. (2013). Implicit individualism in teachers’ theories of creativity: Through the “Four P’s” looking glass. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 23(1), 39–57.Google Scholar

Raina, M. K. (1996). Talent search in the third world: The phenomenon of calculated ambiguity. New Delhi: Vikas.Google Scholar

Raina, M. K. (2002). Gurushishya relationship in Indian culture: The possibility of a creative resilient framework. Psychology and Developing Societies, 14, 166–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raina, M. K. (2004). ‘I shall be many’: The garland making perspective on creativity and cultural diversity. In Fryer, M. (ed.), Creativity and cultural diversity (pp. 25–44). Shipley, UK: The Creativity Centre Educational Trust.Google Scholar

Raina, M. K. & Srivastava, A. K. (2000). India’s search for excellence: A clash of ancient colonial and contemporary influences. Roeper Review, 22, 102–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramos, S. J. (2005). Cross-cultural studies of implicit theories of creativity: A comparative analysis between the United States and the main ethnic groups in Singapore, Master’s thesis, Buffalo State College, NY. https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/creativetheses/29/Google Scholar

Rudowicz, E. (2003). Creativity and culture: A two way interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudowicz, E. & Hui, A. (1997). The creative personality: Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 139–157.Google Scholar

Rudowicz, E. & Yue, X. (2000). Concepts of creativity: Similarities and differences among mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwanese Chinese. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1984). Teacher’s judgments of creativity and social validity of divergent thinking tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 711–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A. & Bahleda, M. D. (1986). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saarilahti, M., Cramond, B., & Sieppi, H. (2012). Is creativity nurtured in Finnish classrooms?. Childhood Education, 75(6), 326–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1999.10522051CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, A. S. & Sharma, N. (2011). Through multiple lenses: Implicit theories of creativity among Indian children and adults. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People’s conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szen-Ziemiańska, J. (2013). Psychometric and self-rated creativity of Polish managers: Are implicit theories of creativity relevant to self-assessment? International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 23(1), 59–69.Google Scholar

Westby, E. L. & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom?. Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0801_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tang, C., Baer, J. & Kaufman, J. (2014). Implicit theories of creativity in computer science in the United States and China. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49, 1–21.Google Scholar

Triandis, H. C. (1975). Social psychology and cultural analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 5, 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Triandis, H. C (1977). Theoretical framework for evaluation of cross-cultural training effectiveness. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1, 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tripathi, S. N. (1993). Indian scientists and creativity: A study. Indian Educational Review, 28, 57–64.Google Scholar

Yue, X. D. (2003). Meritorious evaluation bias: How Chinese under- graduates perceive and evaluate Chinese and foreign creators. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 151–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yue, X. D. (2004). Whoever is influential is creative: How Chinese undergraduates choose creative people in Chinese societies. Psychological Reports, 94, 1235–1249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yue, X. D. & Rudowicz, E. (2002). Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, R. S. (1975). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. American Psychologist, 30, 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allport, G. W. & Boring, E. G. (1946). Psychology and social relations at Harvard University. American Psychologist, 1, 119–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Andersson, D. E., Andersson, Å. E., & Mellander, C. (eds.). (2011). Handbook of creative cities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borowiecki, K. J. (2014). Artistic creativity and extreme events: The heterogeneous impact of war on composers’ production. Poetics, 47, 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenneis, D. (1990). Musical imaginations: Comparative perspectives on musical creativity. In Runco, M. A. & Albert, R. S. (eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 170–189). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Candolle, A. de (1873). Histoire des sciences et des savants depuis deux siècles. Geneva: Georg.Google Scholar

Carneiro, R. L. (1970). Scale analysis, evolutionary sequences, and the rating of cultures. In Naroll, R. & Cohn, R. (eds.), A handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 834–871). New York: Natural History Press.Google Scholar

Carson, S. H. (2014). Cognitive disinhibition, creativity, and psychopathology. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 198–221). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1925/1955). The philosophy of symbolic forms (Vol. 2). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Cerulo, K. A. (1984). Social disruption and its effects on music: An empirical analysis. Social Forces, 62, 885–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Damian, R. I. & Simonton, D. K. (2014). Diversifying experiences in the development of genius and their impact on creative cognition. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 375–393). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damian, R. I. & Simonton, D. K. (2015). Psychopathology, adversity, and creativity: Diversifying experiences in the development of eminent African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 623–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dissanayake, E. (1992). Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Dressler, W. W. & Robbins, M. C. (1975). Art styles, social stratification, and cognition: An analysis of Greek vase painting. American Ethnologist, 2, 427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsburgh, V. & Weyers, S. (2006). Persistence and fashion in art: Italian Renaissance from Vasari to Berenson and beyond. Poetics, 34, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellmanzik, C. (2014). Prominent modern artists: Determinants of creativity. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 564–585). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029aCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, B. F., Reedy, E. J., & Weinberg, B. A. (2014). Age and scientific genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 422–450). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klingemann, H.-D., Mohler, P. P., & Weber, R. P. (1982). Cultural indicators based on content analysis: A secondary analysis of Sorokin’s data on fluctuations of systems of truth. Quality and Quantity, 16, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozbelt, A. (2008). One-hit wonders in classical music: Evidence and (partial) explanations for an early career peak. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozbelt, A. (2014). Musical creativity over the lifespan. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 451–472). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroeber, A. L. (1917). The superorganic. American Anthropologist, 19, 163–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroeber, A. L. (1944). Configurations of culture growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamb, D. & Easton, S. M. (1984). Multiple discovery. Avebury: Avebury.Google Scholar

Lehman, H. C. (1947). National differences in creativity. American Journal of Sociology, 52, 475–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leung, A. K., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lévy-Bruhl, L. (1978). Primitive mentality (trans. by L. A. Clare). New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar

Lomax, A. (ed.). (1968). Folk song style and culture. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar

Lomax, A. & Arensberg, C. M. (1971). A worldwide evolutionary classification of cultures by subsistence systems. Current Anthropology, 18, 659–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcus, J. (2008). The archaeological evidence for social evolution. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martindale, C. (1975). Romantic progression: The psychology of literary history. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1976). Primitive mentality and the relationship between art and society. Scientific Aesthetics, 1, 5–18.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1994). How can we measure a society’s creativity? In Boden, M. A. (ed.), Dimensions of creativity (pp. 159–197). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martindale, C. (2007). Creativity, primordial cognition, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1777–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martindale, C. & Dailey, A. (1996). Creativity, primary process cognition, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrae, R. R. & Greenberg, D. M. (2014). Openness to experience. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 222–243). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKay, A. S. & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Literary geniuses: Their life, work, and death. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 473–487). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1961). Singletons and multiples in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 105, 470–486.Google Scholar

Murdock, G. P. & Provost, C. (1973). Measurement of cultural complexity. Ethnology, 12, 379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Murray, C. (2014). Genius in world civilization. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 486–608). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Nichols, L. T. (1998). Social relations undone: Disciplinary divergence and departmental politics at Harvard, 1946–1970. American Sociologist, 29, 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ochse, R. (1989). A new look at primary process thinking and its relation to inspiration. New Ideas in Psychology, 7, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogburn, W. K. & Thomas, D. (1922). Are inventions inevitable? A note on social evolution. Political Science Quarterly, 37, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peregrine, P. N., Ember, C. R., & Ember, M. (2004). Universal patterns in cultural evolution: An empirical analysis using Guttman scaling. American Anthropologist, 106, 145–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, D. (1986). Little science, big science … and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Raskin, E. A. (1936). Comparison of scientific and literary ability: A biographical study of eminent scientists and men of letters of the nineteenth century. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31, 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritter, S. M., Damian, R. I., Simonton, D. K., van Baaren, R. B., Strick, M., Derks, J., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2012). Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 961–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saad, C. S., Damian, R. I., Benet-Martinez, V., Moons, W. G., & Robins, R. W. (2013). Multiculturalism and creativity: Effects of cultural context, bicultural identity, and cognitive fluency. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 36–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1974). The social psychology of creativity: An archival data analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119–1133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simonton, D. K. (1976a). Do Sorokin’s data support his theory?: A study of generational fluctuations in philosophical beliefs. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1976b). Philosophical eminence, beliefs, and zeitgeist: An individual-generational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 630–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1976c). The sociopolitical context of philosophical beliefs: A transhistorical causal analysis. Social Forces, 54, 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1977a). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1977b). Eminence, creativity, and geographic marginality: A recursive structural equation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 805–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1979). Multiple discovery and invention: Zeitgeist, genius, or chance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1603–1616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1984a). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1984b). Generational time-series analysis: A paradigm for studying sociocultural influences. In Gergen, K. & Gergen, M. (eds.), Historical social psychology (pp. 141–155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1987). Multiples, chance, genius, creativity, and zeitgeist. In Jackson, D. N. & Rushton, J. P. (eds.), Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment (pp. 98–128). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1988). Galtonian genius, Kroeberian configurations, and emulation: A generational time-series analysis of Chinese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1989). Shakespeare’s sonnets: A case of and for single-case historiometry. Journal of Personality, 57, 695–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1991a). Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 27, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1991b). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1992a). Gender and genius in Japan: Feminine eminence in masculine culture. Sex Roles, 27, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1992b). The social context of career success and course for 2,026 scientists and inventors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 452–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1997a). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1997b). Foreign influence and national achievement: The impact of open milieus on Japanese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2000a). Creativity: Cognitive, developmental, personal, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simonton, D. K. (2000b). Methodological and theoretical orientation and the long-term disciplinary impact of 54 eminent psychologists. Review of General Psychology, 4, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2008). Bilingualism and creativity. In Altarriba, J. & Heredia, R. R. (eds.), An introduction to bilingualism: Principles and processes (pp. 147–166). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (scientific) creativity: A hierarchical model of disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 441–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simonton, D. K. (2011). Big-C creativity in the Big City: Definitions, speculations, and complications. In Andersson, D. E., Andersson, Å. E., & Mellander, C. (eds.), Handbook of creative cities (pp. 72–84). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2012a). Creative productivity and aging: An age decrement – or not? In Whitbourne, S. K. & Sliwinski, M. (eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of adult development and aging (pp. 477–496). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2012b). Foresight, insight, oversight, and hindsight in scientific discovery: How sighted were Galileo’s telescopic sightings? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2014). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2018). Intellectual genius in the Islamic Golden Age: Cross-civilization replications, extensions, and modifications. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. & Ting, S.-S. (2010). Creativity in Eastern and Western civilizations: The lessons of historiometry. Management and Organization Review, 6, 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorokin, P. A. (1937–1941). Social and cultural dynamics (Vols. 1–4). New York: American Book.Google Scholar

Sorokin, P. A. & Merton, R. K. (1935). The course of Arabian intellectual development, 700–1300 A.D. Isis, 22, 516–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spiller, G. (1929). The dynamics of greatness. Sociological Review, 21, 218–232.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Suler, J. R. (1980). Primary process thinking and creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 144–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szabo, A. T. (1985). Alphonse de Candolle’s early scientometrics (1883, 1885) with references to recent trends in the field (1978–1983). Scientometrics, 8, 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vohs, K., Redden, J., & Rahinel, R. (2013). Physical order produces healthy choices, generosity, conventionality, whereas disorder produces creativity. Psychological Science, 24, 1860–1867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weiner, E. (2016). The geography of genius. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Yuasa, M. (1974). The shifting center of scientific activity in the West: From the sixteenth to the twentieth century. In. Shigeru, N., Swain, D. L., & Eri, Y. (eds.), Science and society in modern Japan (pp. 81–103). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar

Aiello, J. R., DeRisi, D. T., Epstein, Y. M., & Karlin, R. A. (1977). Crowding and the role of interpersonal distance preference. Sociometry, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ainsworth, R. A., Simpson, L., & Cassell, D. (1993). Effects of three colors in an office interior on mood and performance. Perceptual and motor skills, 76(1), 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alencar, E. U. & Bruno-Faria, M. A. (1997). Characteristics of on organizational environment which stimulate and inhibit creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 87.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (2013). Componential theory of creativity. In Kessler, E. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Management Theory (pp. 135–140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. & Gryskiewicz, N. D. (1989). The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Kalleberg, A. L., & Berg, P. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?. Psychological bulletin, 134(6), 779–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Basadur, M. (1987). Needed research in creativity for business and industrial applications. In Isaksen, S. G. (ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 390–416). Buffalo, NY: Bearly.Google Scholar

Bayton, J. A. (1958). Motivation, cognition, learning: Basic factors in consumer behavior. The Journal of Marketing, 22, 282–289.Google Scholar

Beatty, E. L. & Ball, L. J. (2011). Investigating exceptional poets to inform an understanding of the relationship between poetry and design. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design (pp. 157–165). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bieraugel, M. & Neill, S. (2017). Ascending bloom’s pyramid: Fostering student creativity and innovation in academic library spaces. College and Research Libraries, 78, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bitner, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. The Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blanchette, D. M., Ramocki, S. P., Od́el, J. N., & Casey, M. S. (2005). Aerobic exercise and creative potential: Immediate and residual effects. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumberg, M. & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 560–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boubekri, M., Hull, R. B., & Boyer, L. L. (1991). Impact of window size and sunlight penetration on office workers ́mood and satisfaction: A novel way of assessing sunlight. Environment and Behavior, 23, 474–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyce, P., Hunter, C., & Howlett, O. (2003). The benefits of daylight through windows. Troy, New York: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Google Scholar

Bringslimark, T., Hartig, T., & Patil, G. G. (2007). Psychological benefits of indoor plants in workplaces: Putting experimental results into context. HortScience, 42(3), 581–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ceylan, C. & Dul., J. (2007). Expert opinions on human resource practices for creativity stimulating work environments for innovation in Turkey, The Netherlands and Brazil. In P. G. Benson, A. Mahajan, R. Alas, & R. L. Oliver (eds.), Changes in society, changes in organizations, and the changing role of HRM: Managing international human resources in a complex world. Proceedings of the 9th International Human Resource Conference.Google Scholar

Ceylan, C. & Dul., J. (2019). The place to be: Organizational culture and organizational climate for creativity. In Lubart, T., Botella, M., Caroff, X., Mouchiroud, C., Nelson, J., & Zenasni, F. (eds.), Homo creativus: The 7 C’s of human creativity. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Ceylan, C., Dul, J., & Aytac, S. (2008). Can the office environment stimulate a manager’s creativity? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing and Service Industries, 18, 589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapanis, A., Garner, W. R., & Morgan, C. T. (1948). Applied experimental psychology: Human factors in engineering design. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Coradi, A., Heinzen, M., & Boutellier, R. (2015). A longitudinal study of workspace design for knowledge exploration and exploitation in the research and development process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, M. A. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Paoli, D., Sauer, E., & Ropo, A. (2017). The spatial context of organizations: A critique of “creative workspaces.” Journal of Management and Organization, 1–22.Google Scholar

Diedrich, J., Benedek, M., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2015). Are creative ideas novel and useful? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolan, P. & Metcalfe, R. (2012). The relationship between innovation and subjective wellbeing. Research Policy, 41, 1489–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorniak-Wall, K. (2016). A review of integrated approaches to the study of creativity: A proposal for a systems framework for creativity. In Corazza, G. E. & Agnoli, S. (eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking (pp. 33–52). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dul, J. (2016). Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) logic and methodology of “Necessary but Not Sufficient” causality. Organizational Research Methods, 19, 10–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dul, J., Bruder, R., Buckle, P., Carayon, P., Falzon, P., Marras, W. S., … & van der Doelen, B. (2012). A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: Developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics, 55, 377–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dul, J. & Ceylan, C. (2011). Work environments for employee creativity. Ergonomics, 54, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dul, J. & Ceylan, C. (2014). The impact of a creativity‐supporting work environment on a firm’s product innovation performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 1254–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dul, J., Ceylan, C., & Jaspers, F. (2011). Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment. Human Resource Management, 50, 715–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dul, J., Karwowski, M. & Kaufman, J. (2019). Necessary Condition Analysis in creativity research. In Viktor Dörfler and Marc Stierand (Ed.), Handbook of research methods on creativity (Handbooks of Research Methods in Management). UK: Edward Elgar (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. & Maier, M. A. (2014). Color psychology: Effects of perceiving color on psychological functioning in humans. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Elsbach, K. D. & Pratt, M. G. (2007). The physical environment in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 181–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A. & Strbac, L. (2002). Music is as distracting as noise: The differential distraction of background music and noise on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Ergonomics, 45, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Galasiu, A. D. & Veitch, J. A. (2006). Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 728–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 439–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, J. M. & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 687–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

George, J. M. & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 605–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P., Tanggaard, L., & Wegener, C. (2016). Creativity: A new vocabulary. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Guegan, J., Nelson, J., & Lubart, T. (2017). The relationship between contextual cues in virtual environments and creative processes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20, 202–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haner, U.‐E. (2005). Spaces for creativity and innovation in two established organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 288–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hauff, S., Guerci, M., Dul, J., & Van Rhee, H. (2018). Exploring necessary conditions in HRM research: Fundamental issues and methodological implications. Working paper.Google Scholar

Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., & Martin, B. R. (2008). Creative knowledge environments. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoff, E. V. & Öberg, N. K. (2015). The role of the physical work environment for creative employees: A case study of digital artists. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26, 1889–1906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horng, J.-S., Tsai, C.-Y., Liu, C.-H., & Chung, D. Y.-C. (2015). Measuring employee’s creativity: A new theoretical model and empirical study for tourism industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 20, 1353–1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horng, J.-S., Tsai, C.-Y., Yang, T.-C., & Liu, C.-H. (2016). Exploring the relationship between proactive personality, work environment and employee creativity among tourism and hospitality employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 54, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, D. (1777). An enquiry concerning human understanding. London: Pearson.Google Scholar

Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hygge, S. & Knez, I. (2001). Effects of noise, heat and indoor lighting on cognitive performance and self-reported affect. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jahncke, H., Eriksson, K., & Naula, S. (2015). The effects of auditive and visual settings on perceived restoration likelihood. Noise and Health, 17(74), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jumeno, D. & Matsumoto, H. (2016). The effects of indoor foliage plants on perceived air quality, mood, attention, and productivity. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture Research, 3(4), 1359–1370.Google Scholar

Kallio, T. J., Kallio, K.-M., & Blomberg, A. J. (2015). Physical space, culture and organisational creativity: A longitudinal study. Facilities, 33, 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karwowski, M., Dul, J., Gralewski, J., Jauk, E., Jankowska, D. M., Gajda, A., et al. (2016). Is creativity without intelligence possible? A necessary condition analysis. Intelligence, 57 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kasof, J. (1997). Creativity and breadth of attention. Creativity Research Journal, 10(4), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann, G. (2003). Expanding the mood-creativity equation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, K. & Choi, S. B. (2017). Influences of creative personality and working environment on the research productivity of business school faculty. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, J. & de Dear, R. (2013). Workspace satisfaction: The privacy–communication trade-off in open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knasko, S. C. (1992). Ambient odors’ effect on creativity, mood, and perceived health. Chemical Senses, 17, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knez, I. (1995). Effects of indoor lighting on mood and cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knez, I. (2001). Effects of colour of light on nonvisual psychological processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, A. P. & Baer, M. (2014). Get up, stand up: the effects of a non-sedentary workspace on information elaboration and group performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 910–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kombeiz, O. & Steidle, A. (2018). Facilitation of creative performance by using blue and red accent lighting in work and learning areas. Ergonomics, 61(3), 456–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Küller, R., Ballal, S., Laike, T., Mikellides, B., & Tonello, G. (2006). The impact of light and colour on psychological mood: A cross-cultural study of indoor work environments. Ergonomics, 49(14), 1496–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Küller, R., Mikellides, B., & Janssens, J. (2009). Color, arousal, and performance. A comparison of three experiments. Color Research and Application, 34(2),141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwallek, N. & Lewis, C. M. (1990). Effects of environmental colour on males and females: A red or white or green office. Applied Ergonomics, 21, 275–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kwallek, N., Soon, K., & Lewis, C. M. (2007). Work week productivity, visual complexity, and individual environmental sensitivity in three offices of different color interiors. Journal of Color Research and Application, 32(2), 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwallek, N., Woodson, H., Lewis, C. M., & Sales, C. (1997). Impact of three interior color schemes on worker mood and performance relative to individual environmental sensitivity.Color Research and Application, 22, 121–132.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landry, D. R. (2012). Encouraging creativity in the workplace through the physical environment: Focusing of the office workstation. Thesis from the Architecture Program, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.Google Scholar

Lans, L. V. (2015). Stand up if you mind! How does body position affect creativity and problem solving? Master’s dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar

Larsen, L., Adams, J., Deal, B., Kweon, B. S., & Tyler, E. (1998). Plants in the workplace the effects of plant density on productivity, attitudes, and perceptions. Environment and Behavior, 30(3), 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laursen, K., Masciarelli, F., & Prencipe, A. (2012). Regions matter: How localized social capital affects innovation and external knowledge acquisition. Organization Science, 23(1), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laursen, K., Masciarelli, F., & Prencipe, A. (2012). Regions matter: How localized social capital affects innovation and external knowledge acquisition. Organization Science, 23(1), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, S. Y., & Brand, J. L. (2005). Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, S. Y., & Brand, J. L. (2010). Can personal control over the physical environment ease distractions in office workplaces? Ergonomics, 53, 324–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lee, Y. S. (2016). Creative workplace characteristics and innovative start-up companies. Facilities, 34, 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leenders, M. A., Smidts, A., & El Haji, A. (2016). Ambient scent as a mood inducer in supermarkets: The role of scent intensity and time-pressure of shoppers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.Google Scholar

Lesiuk, T. (2005). The effect of music listening on work performance. Psychology of Music, 33(2), 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lichtenfeld, S., Elliot, A. J., Maier, M. A., & Pekrun, R. (2012). Fertile green facilitates creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(6), 784–797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lubart, T., Botella, M., Caroff, X., Mouchiroud, C., Nelson, J., & Zenasni, F (eds.). (2019). Homo creativus: The 7 C’s of human creativity. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar