Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity,” Available at http://unomaha.worldcat.org/title/creativity-in-context/oclc/34358034.Google Scholar

Baer, J. (2011). How divergent thinking tests mislead us: are the Torrance tests still relevant in the 21st century? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 309–13. doi: 10.1037/a0025210CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batey, M. (2007). A Psychometric Investigation of Everyday Creativity. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar

Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Intelligence and personality as predictors of divergent thinking: the role of general, fluid and crystallised intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 60–9. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: a critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 532–5. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2014). Does insight problem solving predict real-world creativity? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 287–92. doi:10.1037/a0035727CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaussart, M. L., Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Creative activity, personality, mental illness, and short-term mating success. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 151–67. doi: 10.1002/jocb.11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). Creativity versus conscientiousness: which is a better predictor of student performance? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 521–31. doi:10.1002/acp.1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Reichenbacher, L. (2008). Effects of personality and threat of evaluation on divergent and convergent thinking. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1095–1101. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A., Dmitrieva, J., Dong, Q., et al. (2005). Effects of explicit instruction to “be creative” across domains and cultures. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A., Greenberger, E., Dong, Q., et al. (2002). Creativity in drawings of geometric shapes: a cross-cultural examination with the consensual assessment technique. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 171–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crammond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 283–91. doi:10.1177/001698620504900402CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Openness/Intellect: A Dimension of Personality Reflecting Cognitive Exploration. In Mikulincer, M. and Shaver, P. R. (eds.). APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 4: Personality Processes and Individual Differences (pp. 369–99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025–35. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. (2011). “Standardized minds” or individuality? Admissions tests and creativity revisited. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 329–41. doi:10.1037/a0023659CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy, S. M. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: II. Glimpses through the autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1064–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35–47. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 613–17. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, K., & Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1060–9. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A., Crump, J., Batey, M., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Personality and ability predictors of the “consequences” test of divergent thinking in a large non-student sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 536–40. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A., Hughes, D. J., & Marshall, E. (2013). Creativity, OCD, narcissism and the Big Five. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 91–8. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2013.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Hocevar, D. (1979, April). The Development of the Creative Behavior Inventory (CBI). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed. 170 350).Google Scholar

Hughes, D. J., Furnham, A., & Batey, M. (2013). The structure and personality predictors of self-rated creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 76–84. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: new support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41, 212–21. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaufman, S. B. (2012). Counting the muses: development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 298–308. doi:10.1037/a0029751CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., et al. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248–258. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Waterstreet, M. A., Ailaouni, H. S., Whitcomb, H. J., Roe, A. K., et al. (2009). Personality and self-perceptions of creativity across domains. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29, 193–209. doi:10.2190/IC.29.3.cCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, L. A., Walker, L. M., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189–203. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1996.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, S. A., & Dow, G. T. (2011). Malevolent creativity: does personality influence malicious divergent thinking? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 73–82. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.571179CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, I. R., & Kemple, K. (2014). Preservice teachers’ personality traits and engagement in creative activities as predictors of their support for children’s creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 82–94. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.873668CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martindale, C., & Dailey, A. (1996). Creativity, primary process cognition and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 409–14. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)00202-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–65. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niu, W., & Liu, D. (2009). Enhancing creativity: a comparison between effects of an indicative instruction “to be creative” and a more elaborate heuristic instruction on Chinese student creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 93–8. doi:10.1037/a0013660CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: what instructing people to “be creative” reveals about the meaning and mechanisms of divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 423–32. doi:10.1037/a0036549CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric Approaches to the Study of Human Creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 35–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pretz, J. E., & McCollum, V. A. (2014). Self-perceptions of creativity do not always reflect actual creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 227–36. doi:10.1037/a0035597CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Illies, J. J., & Kobe-Cross, L. M. (2009). Conscientiousness is not always a good predictor of performance: the case of creativity. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 19, 27–45.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2004) Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., Illies, J. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2005). Explicit instructions to be creative and original: a comparison of strategies and criteria as targets with three types of divergent thinking tests. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 15, 5–15.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1991). The instructional enhancement of the flexibility and originality scores of divergent thinking tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 435–41. doi:10.1002/acp.2350050505CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sánchez-Ruiz, M. J., Hernández-Torrano, D., Pérez-González, J. C., Batey, M., & Petrides, K. V. (2011). The relationship between trait emotional intelligence and creativity across subject domains. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 461–73. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9227-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Aspenson, H., et al. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: an experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 183–8. doi:10.1037/a0035722CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087–90. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: a review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 19–34. doi:10.1037/a0024071CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68–85. doi: 10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The Concepts of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2009). Do Big Five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderation role of extrinsic motiviation. Social Behavior and Personality, 37, 941–56. doi:10.2224/sbp.2009.37.7.941CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Stumm, S., Chung, A., & Furnham, A. (2011). Creative ability, creative ideation and latent classes of creative achievement: what is the role of personality? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 107–14. doi:10.1037/a0020499CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, B. R., & Jackson, C. J. (2014). How the five factor model and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory predict divergent thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 54–8. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfradt, U. & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 297–310. doi:10.1002/per.409CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wuthrich, V., & Bates, T. C. (2001). Schizotypy and latent inhibition: non-linear linkage between psychometric and cognitive markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 783–98. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00071-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abel, M. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15, 365–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aghababaei, N. (2012). Religious, honest, and humble: looking for the religious person within the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 880–3. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akinola, M., & Mendes, W. (2008). The dark side of creativity: biological vulnerability and negative emotions lead to greater artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1677–86. doi:10.1177/0146167208323933CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: a psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i–171. doi:10.1037/h0093360CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997– 1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1989, July). Personality Factors via Self and Peer Ratings Based on a Representative Sample of German Trait Descriptive Terms. Paper presented at the First European Congress of Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The prediction of honesty-humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216–28. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: a short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–5. doi:10.1080/00223890902935878CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., et al. (2004a). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–66. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.86.2.356CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Vernon, P. A., & Jang, K. L. (2000). Fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and the openness/intellect factor. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babad, E. Y. (1974). A multi-method approach to the assessment of humor. Journal of Personality, 42, 618–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baer, J. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 23–39. doi:10.1080/10400419109534371CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 183–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batey, M. (2007). A Psychometric Investigation of Everyday Creativity. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar

Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2013). Metaphorically speaking: cognitive abilities and the production of figurative language. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 255–67. doi:10.3758/s13421-012–0258–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benedek, M., Mühlmann, C., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 341–9. doi:10.1037/a0033644CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boies, K., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Pascal, S., & Nicol, A. M. (2001). The structure of the French personality lexicon. European Journal of Personality, 15, 277–95. doi:10.1002/per.411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brodzinsky, D. M., & Rubien, J. (1976). Humor production as a function of sex of subject, creativity, and cartoon content. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 597–600. doi:10.1037/0022–006X.44.4.597CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Caird, S., & Martin, R. A. (2014). Relationship-focused humor styles and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: a repeated-measures design. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27, 227–47. doi:10.1515/humor-2014-0015CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardinet, J., Johnson, S., & Pini, G. (2010). Applying Generalizability Theory Using EduG. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1948). Primary personality factors in the realm of objective tests. Journal of Personality, 16, 459–87. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.1948.tb02301.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Christensen, P. R., Guilford, J. P., & Wilson, R. C. (1957). Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 82–8. doi:10.1037/h0045461CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, P. M., & Mirels, H. L. (1970). Fluency as a pervasive element in the measurement of creativity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 83–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connelly, B. S., Ones, D. S., Davies, S. E., & Birkland, A. (2014). Opening up openness: a theoretical sort following critical incidents methodology and a meta-analytic investigation of the trait family measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conner, T. S., DeYoung, C. G., & Silvia, P. J. (in press). Everyday creative activity as a path to flourishing. Journal of Positive Psychology.Google Scholar

Conner, T. S., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Creative days: a daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 463–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, H. (2009). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (4th edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Costa, P.T. Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Dagnes, A. (2012). A Conservative Walks into a Bar: The Politics of Political Humor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Raad, B. (1992). The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word-classes of the Dutch language. European Journal of Personality, 6, 15–29. doi:10.1002/per.2410060103CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Vries, R. E. (2013). The 24-item Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI). Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 871–80. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G. (2011). Intelligence and Personality. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 711–37). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 825–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.2005.00330.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–96. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.93.5.880CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–40. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. (2003). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition, and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. (2011). “Standardized minds” or individuality? Admissions tests and creativity revisited. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 329–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy, S. M. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: II. Glimpses through the autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1064–71. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.64.6.1064CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025–35. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunlop, P. D., Morrison, D. L., Koenig, J., & Silcox, B. (2012). Comparing the Eysenck and HEXACO models of personality in the prediction of adult delinquency. European Journal of Personality, 26, 194–202. doi:10.1002/per.824CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Earleywine, M. (2010). Humor 101. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of Personality. Oxford: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Feingold, A. (1983). Measuring humor ability: revision and construct validation of the Humor Perceptiveness Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 159–66. doi:10.2466/pms.1983.56.1.159CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feingold, A., & Mazzella, R. (1991). Psychometric intelligence and verbal humor ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 427–35. doi:10.1016/0191–8869(91)90060-OCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feingold, A., & Mazzella, R. (1993). Preliminary validation of a multidimensional model of wittiness. Journal of Personality, 61, 439–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.1993.tb00288.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feist, G. J. (2010). The Function of Personality in Creativity: The Nature and Nurture of the Creative Personality. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 113–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Feist, G. J., & Barron, F. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 62–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329–44. doi:10.1037/h0057198CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 613–17. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A., Crump, J., Batey, M., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Personality and ability predictors of the “Consequences” Test of divergent thinking in a large non-student sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 536–40. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P., & Lubart, T. (2016). Toward an integrative model of creativity and personality: theoretical suggestions and preliminary empirical testing. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaughan, E. T., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2012). Examining the utility of general models of personality in the study of psychopathy: a comparison of the HEXACO-PI-R and NEO PI-R. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 513–23. doi:10.1521/pedi.2012.26.4.513CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and Intelligence: Explorations with Gifted Students. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Unconfounding situational attributions from uncertain, neutral, and ambiguous ones: a psychometric analysis of descriptions of oneself and various types of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 517–52. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.41.3.517CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A Broad-Bandwidth, Public Domain, Personality Inventory Measuring the Lower-Level Facets of Several Five-Factor Models. In Mervielde, I., Deary, I., De Fruyt, F., & Ostendorf, F. (eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., et al. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greengross, G., Martin, R. A., & Miller, G. (2012). Personality traits, intelligence, humor styles, and humor production ability of professional stand-up comedians compared to college students. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 74–82. doi:10.1037/a0025774CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greengross, G., & Miller, G. (2011). Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is higher in males. Intelligence, 39, 188–92. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Han, K. (2003). Domain-specificity of creativity in young children: how quantitative and qualitative data support it. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 117–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hahn, D., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (1999). A factor analysis of the most frequently used Korean personality trait adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 13, 261–82.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helson, R., Roberts, B., & Agronick, G. (1995). Enduringness and change in creative personality and the prediction of occupational creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1173–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450– 64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holland, J. L. (1997). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (3rd edn.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Howrigan, D. P., & MacDonald, K. B. (2008). Humor as a mental fitness indicator. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 625–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, D. J., Furnham, A., & Batey, M. (2013). The structure and personality predictors of self-rated creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 76–84. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jang, K. L., Livesley, W., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Vernon, P. A. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on the covariance of facets defining the domains of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), 83–101. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00137–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2016). The Big Five, the Huge Two, and creative self-beliefs: a meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 214–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, S. B. (2009). Faith in intuition is associated with decreased latent inhibition in a sample of high-achieving adolescents. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Opening up openness to experience: a four-factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(4), 233–55. doi:10.1002/jocb.33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Cole, J. C., & Baer, J. (2009). The construct of creativity: a structural model for self-reported creativity ratings. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of Creativity Assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Pumaccahua, T. T., & Holt, R. E. (2013). Personality and creativity in realistic, investigative, artistic, social, and enterprising college majors. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(8), 913–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jimenez, L., Brown, J. B., et al. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., et al. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, L. A., McKee Walker, L., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(2), 189–203. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1996.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Köhler, G., & Ruch, W. (1996). Sources of variance in current sense of humor inventories: how much substance, how much method variance? Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 9, 363–97. doi:10.1515/humr.1996.9.3–4.363CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koppel, M. A., & Sechrest, L. (1970). A multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis of sense of humor. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 77–85. doi:10.1177/001316447003000107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozbelt, A., & Nishioka, K. (2010). Humor comprehension, humor production, and insight: an exploratory study. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 23(3), 375–401. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2010.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–58. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2013). Prediction of self- and observer report scores on HEXACO-60 and NEO-FFI scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 668–75. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2014). The dark triad, the Big Five, and the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 2–5. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lin, W., Hsu, K., Chen, H., & Wang, J. (2011). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: a dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 112–23. doi:10.1037/a0026241Google Scholar

Long, C. R., & Greenwood, D. N. (2013). Joking in the face of death: a terror management approach to humor production. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 26, 493–509. doi:10.1515/humor-2013-0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, R. (2003). Sense of Humor. In Lopez, S. J. & Snyder, C. R. (eds.), Positive Psychological Assessment: A Handbook of Models and Measures (pp. 313–26). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10612-020Google Scholar

Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48–75. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, G. N., & Sullivan, E. (2013). Sense of humor across cultures: a comparison of British, Australian and American respondents. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 375–84.Google Scholar

Masten, A. S. (1986). Humor and competence in school-aged children. Child Development, 57(2), 461–73. doi:10.2307/1130601CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2007). Brief versions of the NEO-PI-3. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(3), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). The Five-Factor Theory of Personality. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (3rd edn., pp. 159–81). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: a more readable revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 261–70. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mednick, S. A. (1968). The remote associates test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 213–14. doi: 10.1002/j.2162–6057.1968.tb00104.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mickes, L., Walker, D. E., Parris, J. L., Mankoff, R., & Christenfeld, N. S. (2012). Who’s funny: gender stereotypes, humor production, and memory bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 108–12. doi:10.3758/s13423-011–0161–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moran, J. M., Rain, M., Page-Gould, E., & Mar, R. A. (2014). Do I amuse you? Asymmetric predictors for humor appreciation and humor production. Journal of Research in Personality, 49, 8–13. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36–45. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: effects of telling people to “be creative” on divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 423–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. B. (in press). Ha ha? Assessing humor production ability and personality. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.Google Scholar

Papousek, I., Schulter, G., Lackner, H. K., Samson, A., & Freudenthaler, H. H. (2014). Experimentally observed responses to humor are related to individual differences in emotion perception and regulation in everyday life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27(2), 271–86. doi:10.1515/humor-2014-0018CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plucker, J. A., Qian, M., & Wang, S. (2011). Is originality in the eye of the beholder? Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of divergent thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pretz, J. E., & McCollum, V. A. (2014). Self-perceptions of creativity do not always reflect actual creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 227–36. doi:10.1037/a0035597CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Primi, R. (2014). Divergent productions of metaphors: combining many-facet Rasch measurement and cognitive psychology in the assessment of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 461–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Puryear, J. S., Kettler, T., & Rinn, A. N. (in press). Relationships of personality to differential conceptions of creativity: a systematic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.Google Scholar

Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2001). Getting a laugh: gender, status, and humor in task discussions. Social Forces, 80(1), 123–58. doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0085CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1986). Flexibility and originality in children’s divergent thinking. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 120(4), 345–52. doi:10.1080/00223980.1986.9712632Google Scholar

Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J. (2007). Knowledge-based assessment of expertise in the arts: exploring aesthetic fluency. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 247–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J. (2015). Intelligence and creativity are pretty similar after all. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2012). Making creative metaphors: the importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought. Intelligence, 40, 343–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2013). Verbal fluency and creativity: general and specific contributions of broad retrieval ability (Gr) factors to divergent thinking. Intelligence, 41, 328–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Aspenson, H., et al. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: an experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2009). Is creativity domain-specific? Latent class models of creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 139–48. doi:10.1037/a0014940CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2012). What’s your major? College majors as markers of creativity. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 22(2), 31–43.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: exploring lower-order, higher-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68– 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal, and Structural Equation Models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, E. E., & Goodchilds, J. D. (1963). The wit in large and small established groups. Psychological Reports, 13(1), 273–4. doi:10.2466/pr0.1963.13.1.273CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sneed, C. D., McCrae, R. R., & Funder, D. C. (1998). Lay conceptions of the five-factor model and its indicators. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(2), 115–26. doi:10.1177/0146167298242001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thalmayer, A., Saucier, G., & Eigenhuis, A. (2011). Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six personality questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 995–1009. doi:10.1037/a0024165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Torrance, E. (1974). Interscholastic brainstorming and creative problem solving competition for the creatively gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 18(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (2008). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms – Technical Manual, Verbal Forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar

Torrance, E., & Haensly, P. A. (2003). Assessment of Creativity in Children and Adolescents. In Reynolds, C. R. & Kamphaus, R. W. (eds.), Handbook of Psychological and Educational Assessment of Children: Intelligence, Aptitude, and Achievement (2nd edn., pp. 584–607). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Treadwell, Y. (1970). Humor and creativity. Psychological Reports, 26(1), 55–8. doi:10.2466/pr0.1970.26.1.55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Turner, R. G. (1980). Self-monitoring and humor production. Journal of Personality, 48(2), 163–72. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.1980.tb00825.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Urban, K. K. (1991). On the development of creativity in children. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Veatch, T. C. (1998). A theory of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 11(2), 161–215. doi:10.1515/humr.1998.11.2.161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, B. R., & Jackson, C. J. (2014). How the five factor model and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory predict divergent thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 54–8. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of Thinking in Young Children: A Study of the Creativity-Intelligence Distinction. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Wasti, S., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & Somer, O. (2008). Six Turkish personality factors and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(6), 665–84. doi:10.1177/0022022108323783Google Scholar

Weisfield, G. E., Nowak, N. T., Lacas, T., Weisfeld, C. C., Imamoğlu, E. O., et al. (2011). Do women seek humorousness in men because it signals intelligence? A cross-cultural test. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24(4), 435–62. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2011.025Google Scholar

Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological Bulletin, 50(5), 362–70. doi:10.1037/h0060857CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wisniewski, E. J. (1997). Conceptual Combination: Possibilities and Esthetics. In Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Vaid, J. (eds.), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (pp. 51–81). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15(4), 297–310. doi:10.1002/per.409CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woo, S. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., Longley, A., Zhang, Z. X., Chiu, C. Y., et al. (2014). Openness to experience: its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ziller, R. C. (1990). Environment-self-behavior: a general theory of personal control. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 5, 227–42.Google Scholar

Zweyer, K., Velker, B., & Ruch, W. (2004). Do cheerfulness, exhilaration, and humor production moderate pain tolerance? A FACS study. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 17, 85–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aitken, S. C., & Wingate, J. (1993). A preliminary study of the self-directed photography of middle-class, homeless, and mobility-impaired children. Professional Geographer, 45, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Amerikaner, M., Schauble, P., & Ziller, R. C. (1980). Images: the use of photographs in personal counseling. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 59, 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 440–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aron, A., Aron, E., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., et al. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21, 372–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and Divergent Thinking: A Task-Specific Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Barron, F. (1997). Introduction. In Barron, F., Montuori, A., & Barron, A. (eds.), Creators on Creating (pp. 1–21). New York: Tarcher-Putnam.Google Scholar

Barron, F, & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beloff, H. (1988). The eye and the me: self-portraits of eminent photographers. Philosophical Psychology, 1, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analysis of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berzonsky, M. D. (1989). Identity style: conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Adolescent Research, 4, 267–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brody, N., & Ehrlichman, H. (1998). Personality Psychology: The Science of Individuality. Upple Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Brumfield, B. (2013, November 20). Selfie Named Word of the Year for 2013, available at www.cnn.com/2013/11/19/living/selfie-word-of-the-year/.Google Scholar

Burke, P. A., & Dollinger, S. J. (2005). “A picture’s worth a thousand words”: language use in the autophotographic essay. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 536–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Casey, P. F., & Dollinger, S. J. (2007). College students’ alcohol-related problems: an autophotographic approach. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 52(2), 8–25.Google Scholar

Cheek, J. M. (1989). Identity Orientations and Self-Interpretation. In Buss, D. M. & Cantor, N. (eds.), Personality Psychology: Recent Trends and Emerging Directions (pp. 275–85). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Cheek, J. M., Tropp, L.R., Chen, L. C., & Underwood, M. K. (1994, August). Identity Orientations: Personal, Social, and Collective Aspects of Identity. Paper presented at the 102nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 341–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clancy, S. M., & Dollinger, S. J. (1993). Photographic depictions of the self: gender and age differences in social connectedness. Sex Roles, 29, 477–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Combs, J., & Ziller, R. C. (1977). The photographic self-concept of counselees. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 24, 452–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, C. A. (1996). An Autophotographic Study of Individuality and Social Relatedness: Relationship Closeness and Dissolution. Unpublished MA thesis, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Damico, S. B. (1985). The two worlds of school: differences in the photographs of black and white adolescents. Urban Review, 17, 210–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeMarie, D. (2010). Successful versus unsuccessful schools through the eyes of children: the use of interviews, autophotography, and picture selection. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12 (no page numbers).Google Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. (1996). Autophotographic identities of young adults: with special reference to alcohol, athletics, achievement, religion, and work. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 384–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dollinger, S. J. (2001). Religious identity: an autophotographic study. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. (2002). Physical attractiveness, social connectedness, and individuality: an autophotographic study. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dollinger, S. J. (2003). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition, and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. (2006). Autophotographic individuality predicts creativity: a seven-year follow-up. Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. (2011). “Standardized minds” or individuality? Admissions tests and creativity revisited. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2011, 329–41.Google Scholar

Dollinger, S. J. (2016). “You are as you read”: do students’ reading interests contribute to their individuality? Reading Psychology, 37, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J., Burke, P. A., & Gump, N. (2007). Creativity and values. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy, S. M. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: II. Glimpses through the autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1064–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy Dollinger, S. M. (1997). Individuality and identity exploration: an autophotographic study. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 337–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy Dollinger, S. M. (2003). Individuality in young and middle adulthood: an autophotographic study. Journal of Adult Development, 10, 227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy Dollinger, S. M. (in press). Creativity and Identity. In Maciej Karwowski & James C. Kaufman (eds.), The Creative Self: How Our Beliefs, Self Efficacy, Mindset and Identity Impact Our Creativity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Dollinger, S. J., Cook, C. A., & Robinson, N. M. (1999a). Correlates of autophotographic individuality: therapy experience and loneliness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J., Kazmierczak, E., & Storkerson, P. K. (2011). Creativity and self-exploration in projective drawings of abused women: evaluating the inside me-outside me workshop. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 6, 202–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J., Matyja, A. M., & Huber, J. L. (2008). Which factors best account for academic success: those which college students can control or those they cannot? Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 872–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J., Preston, L. A., O’Brien, S. P., & DiLalla, D. L. (1996). Individuality and relatedness of the self: an autophotographic study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1268–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dollinger, S. J., Robinson, N. M., & Ross, V. J. (1999b). Photographic individuality, breadth of perspective, and creativity. Journal of Personality, 67, 623–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J., Ross, V. J., & Preston, L. A. (2002). Intellect and individuality. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K.K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domino, G. (1976). Primary process thinking in dream reports as related to creative achievement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 929–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dvorak, J. C. (2013). Age of the Selfie. PC Magazine Digital Edition, December 2013.Google Scholar

Eigenberger, M. E., & Sealander, K. A. (2001). A scale for measuring students anti-intellectualism. Psychological Reports, 89, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eysenck, H. J. (1994). Creativity and personality: word association, origence, and psychoticism. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feist, G. J., & Brady, T. R. (2004). Openness to experience, non-conformity, and the preference for abstract art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghiselli, E. E. (1960). Individuality as a factor in the success of management potential. Personnel Psychology, 13, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartmann, E. (1991). Boundaries in the Mind: A New Psychology of Personality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Helson, R.(1996). In search of the creative personality. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helson, R., & Roberts, R. (1992). The personality of young adult couples and wives’ work patterns. Journal of Personality, 60, 575–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Henningham, J. P. (1996). A 12-item scale of social conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 517–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henry, W. P., & Solano, C. H. (1983). Photographic style and personality: developing a coding system for photographs. Journal of Psychology, 115, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hocevar, D. (1979, April). The Development of the Creative Behavior Inventory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 170,350).Google Scholar

Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holland, J. L. (1985). Vocational Preference Inventory Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2013). Face to (Face)book: the two faces of social behavior? Journal of Personality, 81, 290–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jackson, D. N. (1994). Jackson Personality Inventory–Revised. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.Google Scholar

Johnsen, M., May, J., & Cloke, P. (2008). Imag(in)ing “homeless places”: using auto-photography to (re)examine the geographies of homelessness. Area, 40, 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, M. J. (2004). The effect of participation in the Neighborhood Academic Program on the autophotographic self-concepts of inner-city adolescents. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 188–201.Google Scholar

Karl, K., Peluchette, J., & Schlaegel, C. (2010). Who’s posting Facebook faux pas? A cross-cultural examination of personality differences. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 174–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kasof, J., Chen, C., Himsel, A., & Greenberger, E. (2007). Values and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 105–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, L. A., Walker, L. M., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kluckholn, C., & Murray, H. A. (1953). Personality Formation: The Determinants. In Kluckholn, C., Murray, H. A., & Schneider, D. M. (eds.), Personality in Nature, Society and Culture (pp. 53–67). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Labouvie-Vief, G., Chiodo, L. M., Goguen, L. A., Diehl, M., & Orwoll, L. (1995). Representations of self across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 10, 404–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lippa, R. (1997). The display of masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity in self-descriptive photo essays. Journal of Personality, 65, 137–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego Development: Conceptions and Theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Loevinger, J., & Blasi, A. (1991). Development of the Self as Subject. In Strauss, J. & Goethals, G. R. (eds.), The Self: Interdisciplinary Approaches (pp. 150–67). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Lombard, M. (2013). Using auto-photography to understand place: reflections from research in urban informal settlements in Mexico. Area, 45, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKinnon, D. W (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marcus, B., Machilek, F., & Schütz, A., (2006). Personality in cyberspace: personal websites as media for personality expressions and impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1014–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martindale, C. (1993). Psychoticism, degeneration, and creativity. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 209–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty Years of Creativity Research. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 449–60). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McAdams, D. P. (1996). Alternative futures for the study of human individuality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 374–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCann, S. J. H. (2011). Conservatism, openness, and creativity: patents granted to residents of American states. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 339–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClelland, D. C., & Steele, R. S. (1972). Motivation Workshops. New York: General Learning.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R. (1993–4). Openness to experience as a basic dimension of personality. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 13, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1997). Conceptions and Correlates of Openness to Experience. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (eds.), Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 825–47). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Mealer, F. A. (1997). Autophotographic Individuality and the Lexical Five-Factor Model. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar

Merten, T. (1995). Factors influencing word-association responses: a reanalysis. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 249–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milgram, S. (1977). The Image-Freezing Machine. In Milgram, S. (ed.), The Individual in a Social World: Essays and Experiments (pp. 339–50). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Monteiro, J. M. C., & Dollinger, S. J. (1998). An autophotographic study of poverty, collective orientation and identity among street children. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 403–6.Google ScholarPubMed

Mumford, M. D., Stokes, G. S., & Owens, W. A. (1990). Patterns of Life History: The Ecology of Human Individuality. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test Manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC2001 [computer software and manual]. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Phillips, S. T., & Ziller, R. C. (1997). Toward a theory and measure of the nature of nonprejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 420–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plucker, J. A. (1999). Reanalyses of student responses to creativity checklists: evidence of content generality. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 126–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rinne, T. G., Steel, G. D., & Fairweather, J. (2013). The role of Hofstede’s individualism in national-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 129–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2004). University student reading preferences in relation to the Big Five personality factors. Reading Psychology, 25, 273–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–26). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: a review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: the development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 518–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spielberger, C. (1979). Preliminary Manual for the State-Trait Personality Inventory (STPI). Unpublished manual, University of South Florida, Center for Research in Behavioral Medicine and Health Psychology.Google Scholar

Steadman, I. (2014). Who owns your selfie? New Statesman, April 11–17, p. 18.Google Scholar

Storr, A. (1988). Solitude: A Return to the Self. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar

Sullivan, E. T., Clark, W. W., & Tiegs, E. W. (1970). Short Form Test of Academic Aptitude. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Suran, B. G. (1978). Oddballs: The Social Maverick and the Dynamics of Individuality. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar

Tyler, L. E. (1978). Individuality: Human Possibilities and Personal Choice in the Psychological Development of Men and Women. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1991). Test for Creative Thinking: Drawing Production Manual. Frankfort, Germany: Swets Test Services.Google Scholar

Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of Thinking in Young Children: A Study of the Creativity–Intelligence Distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Wallach, M. A., & Wing, C. W. Jr. (1969). The Talented Student: A Validation of the Creativity–Intelligence Distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Wilson, G. D., Ausman, J., & Mathews, T. R. (1973). Conservatism and art preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 286–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 362–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wortham, J. (2013). My Selfie, Myself. New York Times Sunday Review, October 19.Google Scholar

Yang, S. (2012). An autophotography of the young adult children of bereaved families in Korea. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 17, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yao, X., Wang, S., Dang, J., & Wang, L. (2012). The role of individualism-collectivism in the individual creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 296–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ziller, R. C. (1990/2000). Photographing the Self. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Ziller, R. C., & Lewis, D. (1981). Orientations: self, social, and environmental percepts through auto-photography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 338–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ziller, R. C., & Rorer, B. A. (1985). Shyness-environment interaction: a view from the shy side through auto-photography. Journal of Personality, 53, 626–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Amabile, T. M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–67). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Baer, M. (2010). The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: a comprehensive examination and extension. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 95, 592–601. doi: 10.1037/a0018761CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baer, M., Oldham, G., Jacobsohn, G., & Hollingshead, A. (2008). The personality composition of teams and creativity: the moderating role of team creative confidence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 255–82. doi: 10.1002/j.2162–6057.2008.tb01299.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrick, M. R., and Mount, M. K. (1991).The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1744–6570.1991.tb00688.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, B., & Stewart, G. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62–78. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.82.1.62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595–615. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.92.3.595CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238–56. doi:10.5465/AMR.2003.9416096CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolin, A. U., & Neuman, G. A. (2006). Personality, process, and performance in interactive brainstorming groups. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 565–85. doi: 10.1007/s10869-005–9000-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, B. H., Klotz, A. C., Postlethwaite, B. E., & Brown, K. G. (2012). Ready to rumble: how team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 385–92. doi: 10.1037/a0029845Google ScholarPubMed

Burgelman, R. A., (2002). Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 325–57. doi: 10.2307/3094808CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400. doi: 10.1037/h0040373CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1096–1127. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.90.6.1096CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–8. doi: 10.1037/0003–066X.41.10.1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 290–309. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5Google ScholarPubMed

Ford, C., & Sullivan, D. M. (2004). A time for everything: how the timing of novel contributions influences project team outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 279–92. doi: 10.1002/job.241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 439–77. doi: 10.1080/078559814CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilson, L. L. (2008). Why Be Creative: A Review of the Practical Outcomes Associated with Creativity at the Individual, Group, and Organizational Levels. In Zhou, J. & Shalley, C. E. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 303–22). New York: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar

Gilson, L. L., Lim, H. S., Litchfield, R. C., & Gilson, P. W. (2015). Creativity in Teams: A Key Building Block for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. In Shalley, C. E. & Zhou, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199927678.013.0015Google Scholar

Gilson, L. L., & Madjar, N. (2011). Radical and incremental creativity: antecedents and processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 21–8. doi: 10.1037/a0017863CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilson, L. L., Litchfield, R., & Gilson, P. W. (2014). An Examination of the Relationship between Time and Creativity. In Shipp, A. J. & Fried, Y. (eds.), Time and Work: Current Issues in Work and Organizational Psychology (pp. 141–62). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1081–1111. doi:10.5465/AMR.1996.9704071864CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilson, L. L., Mathieu, J. E., Shalley, C. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (2005). Creativity and standardization: complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 521–31. doi:10.5465/amj.2005.17407916CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1081–1111. doi:10.5465/AMR.1996.9704071864CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gong, Y., Kim, T. Y., Zhu, J., & Lee, D. R. (2013). A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 827–51. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

González-Romá, V., Fortes-Ferreira, L., & Peiró, J. M. (2009). Team climate, climate strength, and team performance: a longitudinal study. Journal of Occupatinal and Organizational Psychology, 82, 511–36. doi: 10.1348/096317908X370025Google Scholar

Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.37.8.1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693–706. doi: 10.2307/20159793CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group Tasks, Group Interaction Process, and Group Performance Effectiveness: A Review and Proposed Integration. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45–99). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60248–8Google Scholar

Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: a field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17, 484–500. doi: 0.1287/orsc.1060.0200CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S. H., & Rouse, E. D. (2014). Let’s dance! Elastic coordination in creative group work: a qualitative study of modern dancers. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1256–83. doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.0343CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvey, S. (2014). Creative synthesis: exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39, 324–43. doi: 10.5465/amr.2012.0224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481–94. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0078CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, S. T., & Cushenbery, L. (2014). Is being a jerk necessary for originality? Examining the role of disagreeableness in the sharing and utilization of original ideas. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 621. doi: 10.1007/s10869-014–9386-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jabri, M. M. (1991). The development of conceptually independent subscales in the measurement of modes of problem solving. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 975–83. doi: 10.1177/001316449105100417CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–9. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.61.5.622CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohn, N., Paulus, P., & Choi, Y. (2011). Building on the ideas of others: an examination of the idea combination process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 554–61. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A Multilevel Approach to Theory and Research in Organizations: Contextual, Temporal, and Emergent Processes. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press: doi: 10.5897/PPR2013.0102.Google Scholar

Litchfield, R. C. (2008). Brainstorming reconsidered: a goal-based view. Academy of Management Review, 33, 649–68. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.32465708CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madjar, N., Greenberg, E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 730–43. doi: 10.1037/a0022416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mainemelis, C. (2010). Stealing fire: creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35, 558–78.Google Scholar

March, J. G. (1976). The Technology of Foolishness. In March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (eds.), Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (pp. 69–81). Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar

Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–76. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316061CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40, 130–60. doi:10.1177/0149206313503014CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mathisen, G. E., Martinsen, Ø., & Einarsen, S. (2008). The relationship between creative personality composition, innovative team climate, and team innovativeness: an input-process-output perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 13–31. doi:10.1002/j.2162–6057.2008.tb01078.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrae, R.R.(1987).Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personaity and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–65. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.52.6.1258Google Scholar

Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2011). The effect of conformists and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 740–60. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.64870100CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–20. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.103.1.27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murnighan, J. K., & Conlon, D. E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: a study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 165–85. doi: 10.2307/2393352CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 257–79. doi: 10.1002/job.376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied Imagination. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: the illusion of group productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 78–89. doi:10.1177/0146167293191009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peeters, M. A. G., Van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., Rutte, C. G., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2006). Personality and team performance: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 20, 377–96. doi: 0.1002/per.588CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2014). A social composition view of team creativity: the role of member nationality heterogeneous ties outside the team. Organization Science, 25, 1434–52. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0912CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pirola-Merlo, A. (2010). Agile innovation: the role of team climate in rapid research and development. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 1075–84. doi: 10.1348/096317909X480653CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinig, B. A., Briggs, R. O., and Nunamaker, J. F. Jr. (2007). On the measurement of ideation quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 143–61. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230407CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Wigert, B., & Vreede, T. d. (2012). Team Creativity and Innovation: The Effect of Group Composition, Social Processes, and Cognition. In Michael, D. M. (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 295–326). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310. doi:10.2307/20342603.Google Scholar

Robert, C., & Cheung, Y. H. (2010). An examination of the relationship between conscientiousness and group performance on a creative task. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 222–31. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schilpzand, M. C., Herold, D. M., & Shalley, C. E. (2011). Members’ openness to experience and teams’ creative performance. Small Group Research, 42, 55–76. doi:10.1177/1046496410377509CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shalley, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 179–85. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.76.2.179CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: the role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management, 39, 684–708. doi: 10.1177/014920631039418CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315–30. doi: 10.2307/3069349CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–17. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.88.3.500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14, 516–31. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weick, K. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9, 543–55. doi: 10.1287/orsc.9.5.543CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293–321. doi:10.2307/258761CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zack, M. H. (2000). Jazz improvisation and organizing: once more from the top. Organization Science, 11, 227–34. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.2.227.12507CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2011). Deepening Our Understanding of Creativity in the Workplace: A Review of Different Approaches to Creativity Research. In Zedeck, S. (ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1: Building and Developing the Organization (pp. 275–302). Washington, DC. American Psychogical Association. doi: 10.1037/12169-009Google Scholar