Book contents
- Reviews
- The Cambridge Handbook of Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Sustainability
- The Cambridge Handbook of Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Sustainability
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Forewords
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Global Business and Fragmented Regulation
- Part II Corporate Law, Financial Markets and Sustainability
- Part III Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Sustainability: Case Studies
- 10 Progress Is Possible
- 11 Green but Not Enough
- 12 The Australian Paradox
- 13 Moving beyond Virtue Signalling
- 14 The EU as a Potential Norm Creator for Sustainable Corporate Groups
- 15 Market-Led Sustainability through Information Disclosure
- 16 Law, Culture and Sustainability
- 17 Stakeholder Value versus Corporate Sustainability
- 18 Worker Participation, Sustainability and the Puzzle of the Volkswagen Emissions Scandal
- 19 Corporate Sustainability and Shareholder Activism in the Netherlands
- 20 Old-Fashioned yet Innovative
- 21 The Unsuccessful Pursuit for Sustainability in Italian Business Law
- 22 Sustainability and the Transformation of the Socialist Corporation into the Private Corporation
- 23 Limited Demand, Limited Supply
- 24 The Pacific Alliance
- 25 Social Environmentalism and Corporate Capture
- 26 The Social and Ethics Committee
- 27 Reforming the Nigerian Oil and Gas Sector
- 28 Enlightenment or Resistance?
- 29 The Community Company as a Vehicle for Sustainability in Solomon Islands
- 30 What Does It Mean to Be Sustainable?
- 31 Shareholder Voting and Corporate Sustainability in China
- 32 Corporate Governance Reform, Social Norms and Sustainability in Japanese Companies
- 33 Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in India
- 34 Sustainability and Legislated Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia
- 35 Islamic Financial Institutions and Corporate Sustainability
- 36 Leaders or Laggards?
- Part IV Potential Drivers for Change
- Conclusion
- Index
31 - Shareholder Voting and Corporate Sustainability in China
An Empirical Study
from Part III - Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Sustainability: Case Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 November 2019
- Reviews
- The Cambridge Handbook of Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Sustainability
- The Cambridge Handbook of Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Sustainability
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Forewords
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Global Business and Fragmented Regulation
- Part II Corporate Law, Financial Markets and Sustainability
- Part III Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Sustainability: Case Studies
- 10 Progress Is Possible
- 11 Green but Not Enough
- 12 The Australian Paradox
- 13 Moving beyond Virtue Signalling
- 14 The EU as a Potential Norm Creator for Sustainable Corporate Groups
- 15 Market-Led Sustainability through Information Disclosure
- 16 Law, Culture and Sustainability
- 17 Stakeholder Value versus Corporate Sustainability
- 18 Worker Participation, Sustainability and the Puzzle of the Volkswagen Emissions Scandal
- 19 Corporate Sustainability and Shareholder Activism in the Netherlands
- 20 Old-Fashioned yet Innovative
- 21 The Unsuccessful Pursuit for Sustainability in Italian Business Law
- 22 Sustainability and the Transformation of the Socialist Corporation into the Private Corporation
- 23 Limited Demand, Limited Supply
- 24 The Pacific Alliance
- 25 Social Environmentalism and Corporate Capture
- 26 The Social and Ethics Committee
- 27 Reforming the Nigerian Oil and Gas Sector
- 28 Enlightenment or Resistance?
- 29 The Community Company as a Vehicle for Sustainability in Solomon Islands
- 30 What Does It Mean to Be Sustainable?
- 31 Shareholder Voting and Corporate Sustainability in China
- 32 Corporate Governance Reform, Social Norms and Sustainability in Japanese Companies
- 33 Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in India
- 34 Sustainability and Legislated Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia
- 35 Islamic Financial Institutions and Corporate Sustainability
- 36 Leaders or Laggards?
- Part IV Potential Drivers for Change
- Conclusion
- Index
Summary
Despite the growing literature on China’s proliferating corporate social responsibility initiatives, little is known empirically about how Chinese shareholders react to these initiatives in their invested firms. Drawing upon a unique, hand-collected dataset containing the votes cast at shareholders’ meetings in Chinese A-share listed firms, this research reveals two divergent patterns. Some shareholders support (or oppose) such initiatives as often as they do proposals most susceptible to conflicts of interest (e.g. a firm transacting with its controlling shareholder). Others vote more strategically, rarely opposing such proposals as rigorously as they oppose proposals with a perceived negative impact on their immediate financial interests. Their varied approaches seem to be correlated with certain firm characteristics such as who controls the firm (i.e. state or private actors) and how strong the degree of control is.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
- 2
- Cited by