Aaker, J., Vohs, K. D., & Mogilner, C. (2010). Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 224–237.Google Scholar

Andrews, J. C., Netemeyer, R. G., & Burton, S. (1998). Consumer generalization of nutrient content claims in advertising. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 62–75.Google Scholar

Baca-Motes, K., Brown, A., Gneezy, A., Keenan, E. A., & Nelson, L. D. (2013). Commitment and behavior change: Evidence from the field. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 1070–1084.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 1193–1209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, C. M., Schaubroeck, J. M., Huth, M., & Ghumman, S. (2011). Lack of sleep and unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115 (2), 169–180.Google Scholar

Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Batson, D. C., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., & Strongman, J. A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 525–537.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2000). Ego depletion: A resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled processing. Social Cognition, 18, 130–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Making decisions with competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 225–241.Google Scholar

Berman, J. Z., & Small, D. A. (2015). Judgments of virtue in consumer behavior. Working Paper.Google Scholar

Bonini, S., & Oppenheim, J. (2008). Cultivating the green consumer. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 56–61.Google Scholar

Business News Daily (2010). Men less like to buy into “green” movement. Retrieved from www.businessnewsdaily.com/479-men-less-likely-to-buy-into-green-movement.html.Google Scholar

Catlin, J. R., & Wang, Y. (2013). Recycling gone bad: When the option to recycle increases resource consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(1), 122–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65–81.Google Scholar

Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1995). Preference reversals in monetary and life expectancy evaluations. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 62(3), 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chu, J. (2013). Toms sets out to sell a lifestyle, not just shoes. Fast Company. Retrieved from www.fastcompany.com/3012568/blake-mycoskie-toms.Google Scholar

Dalton, A. N., & Huang, L. (2014). Motivated forgetting in response to social identity threat. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1017–1038.Google Scholar

Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desai, K. K., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000). Descriptive characteristics of memory-based consideration sets: Influence of usage occasion frequency and usage location familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 309–323.Google Scholar

Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307–319.Google Scholar

Ehrich, K. R., & Irwin, J. R. (2005). Willful ignorance in the request for product attribute information. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(3), 266–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Federal Trade Commission (2012). FTC issues revised green guides. Retrieved from www.ftc.gov/opa/2012/10/greenguides.shtm.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. La Jolla, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A. (1988). Lay Theories: Everyday Understanding of Problems in the Social Sciences. Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardiner, B. (2010). Upcycling evolves from recyclying. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2010/11/04/business/energy-environment/04iht-rbogup.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.Google Scholar

Gershoff, A. D., & Frels, J. K. (2015). What makes it green? The role of centrality of green attributes in evaluations of the greenness of products. Journal of Marketing, 79(1), 97–110.Google Scholar

Gershoff, A. D., & Irwin, J. R. (2012). Why not choose green? Consumer decision making for environmentally friendly products. In Bansal, P. & Hoffman, A. J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Natural Environment (pp. 366–383). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gino, F., Schweitzer, M. E., Mead, N. L., & Ariely, D. (2011). Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D. & Cronin, J. J. Jr. (2013). Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 44–61.Google Scholar

Globescan (2010). British sense of fair play helps workers in the developing world. Retrieved from www.globescan.com/news_archives/fairtrade_consumer/.Google Scholar

Goldstein, N., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 472–482.Google Scholar

Greenhouse, S. (2012). Wal-Mart labor protests grow, organizers say. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2012/10/10/business/organizers-say-wal-mart-labor-protests-spread.html.Google Scholar

Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.Google Scholar

Gupta, R., & Sen, S. (2013). The effect of evolving resource synergy beliefs on the intentions-behavior discrepancy in ethical consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(1), 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002.Google Scholar

Haws, K. L., Naylor, R. W., Coulter, R. A., & Bearden, W. O. (2012). Keeping it all without being buried alive: Understanding product retention tendency. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 224–326.Google Scholar

Haws, K. L., Winterich, K. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2014). Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336–354.Google Scholar

Heller, D., Levin, I. P, & Goransson, M. (2002). Selection of strategies for narrowing choice options: Antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(2), 1194–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howlett, E., Burton, S., Bates, K., & Huggins, K. (2009). Coming to a restaurant near you? Potential consumer response to nutrition information disclosures on menus. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 494–503.Google Scholar

Irmak, C., Wakslak, C. J., & Trope, Y. (2013). Selling the forest, buying the trees: The effect of construal level on seller-buyer price discrepancy. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 284–297.Google Scholar

Irwin, J. R. (1994). Buying/selling price preference reversals: Preference for environmental changes in buying versus selling modes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(3), 431–457.Google Scholar

Irwin, J. R., & Baron, J. (2001). Response mode effects and moral values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(2), 177–197.Google Scholar

Irwin, J. R., & Naylor, R. W. (2009). Ethical decisions and response mode compatibility: Weighting of ethical attributes in consideration sets formed by excluding versus including product alternatives. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(2), 234–246.Google Scholar

Irwin, J. R., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., & McClelland, G. H. (1993). Preference reversals and the measurement of environmental values. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6(1), 1–13.Google Scholar

Irwin, J. R., & Spira, J. S. (1997). Anomalies in the values for consumer goods with environmental attributes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6(4), 339–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jongmans, E., Jolibert, A., & Irwin, J. R. (2014). Toujours plus, toujours mieux? Effet contre-intuitif de l’évaluation des attributs environnementaux du produit par le consommateur. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 29(3), 10–33.Google Scholar

Kidwell, B., Farmer, R. A., & Hardesty, D. M. (2013). Getting liberals and conservatives to go green: Political ideology and congruent appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 350–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohlberg, L. (1984). The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Kouchaki, M., & Smith, I. H. (2014). The morning morality effect: The influence of time of day on unethical behavior. Psychological Science, 25, 95–102.Google Scholar

Kozup, J. C., Creyer, E. H., & Burton, S. (2003). Making healthful food choices: The influence of health claims and nutrition information on consumers’ evaluations of packaged food products and restaurant menu items. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 19–34.Google Scholar

Kronrod, A., Grinstein, A., & Wathieu, L. (2012). Go green!! Should environmental messages be so assertive?? Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 95–102.Google Scholar

Lamberton, C. P., & Rose, R. (2012). Yours, mine and ours: An investigation of consumers’ propensity to participate in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing, July, 109–125.Google Scholar

Lastovicka, J. L., Bettencourt, L. A., Hughner, R. S., & Kuntze, R. J. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: Theory and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, I. P., Prosansky, C. M., Heller, D., & Brunick, B. M. (2001). Prescreening of choice options in “positive” and “negative” decision-making tasks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14(4), 279–293.Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, S., Gregory, R., & Irwin, J. R. (2007). What’s bad is easy: Taboo values, affect, and cognition. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(3), 169–188.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G. (2006). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272–292.Google Scholar

Luce, M. F. (1998). Choosing to avoid: Coping with negatively emotion-laden consumer decision. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 409–433.Google Scholar

Luce, M. F., Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (2000). Coping with unfavorable attribute values in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(2), 274–299.Google Scholar

Luchs, M., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGraw, P. A., Schwartz, J. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (2012). From the commercial to the communal: Reframing taboo trade-offs in religious and pharmaceutical marketing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 157–173.Google Scholar

McGraw, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Taboo trade-offs, relational framing, and the acceptability of exchanges. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 2–15.Google Scholar

Milkman, K. L., Rogers, T., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). Harnessing our inner angels and demons: What we have learned about want/should conflicts and how that knowledge can help us reduce short-sighted decision making. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 324–338.Google Scholar

Mintel, (2014). Marketing to the green consumer. Retrieved from http://store.mintel.com/marketing-to-the-green-consumer-us-march-2014.Google Scholar

Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding "meaning" in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61(3), 192–203.Google Scholar

Nedungadi, P. (1990). Recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 263–276.Google Scholar

Nelson, G., & Peterka, A. (2010). FTC proposes crackdown on “greenwashing.” New York Times, October 6.Google Scholar

Newman, G. E. & Cain, D. A. (2014). Tainted altruism: When doing some good is evaluated as worse than doing no good at all. Psychological Science, 25(3), 648–655.Google Scholar

Newman, G. E., Gorlin, M., & Dhar, R. (2014). When going green backfires: How firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial. Working Paper.Google Scholar

Nielsen, (2013). 50% of global consumers surveyed willing to pay more for goods, services from socially responsible companies, up from 2011. Retrieved from www.nielsen.com/us/en/press-room/2013/nielsen-50-percent-of-global-consumers-surveyed-willing-to-pay-more-fo.html.Google Scholar

Paharia, N., Vohs, K. D., & Deshpandé, R. (2013). Sweatshop labor is wrong unless the shoes are cute: Cognition can both help and hurt moral motivated reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(1), 81–88.Google Scholar

Peloza, J., White, K., & Shang, J. (2013). Good and guilt free: The role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 104–119.Google Scholar

Peters, E., Slovic, P., & Gregory, R. (2003). The role of affect in the WTA/WTP disparity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(4), 309–330.Google Scholar

Phipps, M., & Brace-Govan, J. (2011). From right to responsibility: Sustainable change in water consumption. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 30(2), 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prothero, A., Dobscha, S., Freund, J., Kilbourne, W. E., Luchs, M. G., Ozanne, L., & Thøgersen, J. (2011). Sustainable consumption: Opportunities for consumer research and public policy. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 30(1), 31–38.Google Scholar

Reczek, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Ehrich, K. R. (2015). That’s not how I remember it: Willfully ignorant memory for ethical product attribute information. Working Paper.Google Scholar

Redden, J. P., & Haws, K. L. (2013). Healthy satiation: The role of decreasing desire in effective self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 1100–1114.Google Scholar

Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1999). Protected values and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(2), 79–94.Google Scholar

Schulze, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429–434.Google Scholar

Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. in Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (pp. 397–420). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Small, D. A. (2010). Reference-dependent sympathy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112, 151–160.Google Scholar

Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping “a” victim or helping “the” victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(1), 5–16.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. R., Kahneman, D., Schkade, D. A., & Ritov, I. (2002). Predictably incoherent judgments. Stanford Law Review, 54(6), 1153–1215.Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. E., & Elson, B. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 853–870.Google Scholar

Trudel, R., & Argo, J. J. (2013). The effect of product size and form distortion on consumer recycling behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 632–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trudel, R., & Cotte, J. (2009). Does it pay to be good? MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 61–68.Google Scholar

Van Ittersum, K., & Wansink, B. (2012). Plate size and color suggestibility: The Delbouef illusion’s bias on serving and eating behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 434–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wal-Mart, (2014). The sustainability index. Retrieved from http://corporate.walmart.com/global-responsibility/environment-sustainability/sustainability-index.Google Scholar

Wansink, B., & Chandon, P. (2014). Slim by design: Redirecting the accidental drivers of mindless overeating. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 413–431.Google Scholar

Wansink, B., Kent, R. J., & Hoch, S. J. (1998). An anchoring and adjustment model of purchase quantity decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 71–81.Google Scholar

Wells, W. (1993). Discovery-oriented consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 489–503.Google Scholar

White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Ellard, J. H. (2012). Belief in a just world: Consumer intentions and behaviors toward ethical products. Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 103–118.Google Scholar

White, K., & Simpson, B. (2013). When do (and don’t) normative appeals influence sustainable consumer behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 78–95.Google Scholar

White, K., Simpson, B., & Argo, J. J. (2014). The motivating role of dissociative out-groups in encouraging positive consumer behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 433–447.Google Scholar

White, R. (2014). U.S. charitable giving jumped 13% in 2013 to a record, report says. Los Angeles Times, January 13. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2014/jan/13/business/la-fi-mo-charitable-donations-record-2013-americans-20140113.Google Scholar

Ying-Ching, L., & Chang, C. A. (2012). Double standard: The role of environmental consciousness in green product usage. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 125–134.Google Scholar

Ahn, H., Park, J. S., & Haley, E. (2014). Consumers’ optimism bias and responses to risk disclosures in direct-to-consumer. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 48(1), 175–194.Google Scholar

Aikin, K.J., O’Donoghue, A.C., Swasy, J.L., & Sullivan, H.W. (2001). Randomized trial of risk information formats in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements. Medical Decision Making, 31(6), 23–33.Google Scholar

American Cancer Society (2014). E-Cigarettes – it’s complicated. Accessed May 1, 2014. Retrieved from www.cancer.org/cancer/news/expertvoices/post/2014/06/24/e-cigarettes-its-complicated.aspx.Google Scholar

Andrews, J. C. (2011). Warnings and disclosures. In Fischhoff, B., Brewer, N., & Downs, J., (eds.), Communicating Risk and Benefits: An Evidence-Based Users Guide (pp. 149–161). Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food & Drug Administration.Google Scholar

Andrews, J. C., Burton, S., & Kees, J. (2011). Is Simpler Always Better? Consumer Evaluations of Front-of-Package Nutrition Symbols. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30 (2), pp. 175–90.Google Scholar

Andrews, J. C., Burton, S., & Netemeyer, R.G. (2000). Are some comparative nutrition claims misleading? The role of nutrition knowledge, ad claim type, and disclosure conditions. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 29–42.Google Scholar

Andrews, J. C., Lin, C. J., Levy, A. S., & Lo, S. (2014). Consumer research needs from the Food and Drug Administration on front-of-package nutritional labeling. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 33(1), 1.Google Scholar

Andrews, J. C., Netemeyer, R. G., Kees, J., & Burton, S. (2014). How graphic visual health warnings affect young smokers’ thoughts of quitting. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(2), 165–183.Google Scholar

Argo, J. J., & Main, K. J. (2004). Meta-analyses of the effectiveness of warning labels. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 23(2), 193–208.Google Scholar

Arnett, J. J. (2000). Optimistic bias in adolescent and adult smokers and nonsmokers. Addictive Behaviors, 25(4), 625–632.Google Scholar

Ashley, D. L., & Backinger, C. L. (2012). The Food and Drug Administration’s regulation of tobacco: The Center for Tobacco Products’ Office of Science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(5 Suppl 3), S255.Google Scholar

Bettman, J. R., Payne, J. W., & Staelin, R. (1986). Cognitive considerations in designing effective labels for presenting risk information. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 5, 1–28.Google Scholar

Blanton, H., Snyder, L. B., Strauts, E., & Larson, J. G. (2014). Effect of graphic cigarette warnings on smoking intentions in young adults.. PLoS One, 9(5), e96315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blumenthal, P. M., & Perry, V. G. (2012). Understanding the fine print: The need for effective testing of mandatory mortgage loan disclosures. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(2), 305–312.Google Scholar

Bombard, J. M., Pederson, L. L., Nelson, D. E., & Malarcher, A. M. (2007). Are smokers only using cigarettes? Exploring current polytobacco use among an adult population. Addictive Behaviors, 32(10), 2411.Google Scholar

Bullen, C., Howe, C., Laugesen, M., McRobbie, H., Paraq, V., Williman, J., & Walker, N. (2013), Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: A randomized controlled trial. Lancet, 382(9905), 1629–1637.Google Scholar

Burke, Michael (2007). Tips for developing logic models. Paper presented at the 135th Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, November 3–7. Retrieved from www.rti.org/pubs/apha07_burke_poster.pdf.Google Scholar

Burton, S., Creyer, E., Kees, J., & Huggins, K. (2006). Attacking the obesity epidemic: The potential health benefits of providing nutrition information in restaurants. American Journal of Public Health, 96(September), 1669–1675.Google Scholar

Burton, S., Howlett, E., & Tangari, A. (2009). Food for thought: How will the nutrition labeling of quick service restaurant menu items influence consumers’ product evaluations, purchase intentions, and choices? Journal of Retailing, 85(3), 258–273.Google Scholar

Burton, S., & Kees, J. (2012). Flies in the ointment? Addressing potential impediments to population-based health benefits of restaurant menu labeling initiatives. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(2), 232–239.Google Scholar

Capella, M. L., Taylor, C. R., & Kees, J. (2012). Tobacco harm reduction advertising in the presence of a government-mandated warning. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 46(2), 235–259.Google Scholar

CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) (2013). MMWR, 62 (35, September 6,), 729–730. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6235a6.htm.Google Scholar

CDC (2014a). Smoking & tobacco use: Fast facts, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed May 16, 2014. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/ fact_sheets/fast_facts/index.htm.Google Scholar

CDC (2014b). Overweight and obesity. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/index.htm.Google Scholar

Chandon, P., & Wansink, B. (2007). The biasing health halos of fast-food restaurant health claims: Lower calorie estimates and higher side-dish consumption intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 301–314. doi:10.1086/519499.Google Scholar

Chen, L. (2013). FDA summary on adverse events on electronic cigarettes. Nicotine and tobacco research. (Published online August 1.) doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts145.Google Scholar

Choi, K., Fabian, L., Mottey, N., Corbett, A., & Forster, J. (2012). Young adults’ favorable perceptions of snus, dissolvable tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes: Findings from a focus group study. American Journal of Public Health, 102(11), 2088–2093.Google Scholar

Choinière, C. J., & Lando, A. (2013). 2008 health and diet survey. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Accessed May 11, 2014. Available at www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/ConsumerBehaviorResearch/ucm193895.htm.Google Scholar

Cobb, N. K., & Abrams, D. B. (2011). E-cigarette or drug-delivery device? Regulating novel nicotine products. New England Journal of Medicine, 365(3), 193–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives. (2014). Gateway to addiction? A survey of popular electronic cigarette manufacturers and targeted marketing to youth. Retrieved from http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report-E-Cigarettes-Youth-Marketing-Gateway-To-Addiction-2014-4-14.pdf.Google Scholar

Cox, E. P., Wogalter, M. S., Stokes, S. L., & Murff, E. J. T. (1997). Do product warnings increase safe behavior? A meta-analysis. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 16(2), 195–204.Google Scholar

Cox, A. D., Cox, D., & Mantel, S. P. (2010). Consumer response to drug risk information: The role of positive affect. Journal of Marketing, 74(July), 31–44.Google Scholar

Cox, W. A. (2010). Public disclosure requirements for buyers and sellers: Justifications for other than full and open competition. Contract Management, 50(2), 44.Google Scholar

Drichoutis, A. C., Lazaridis, P., & Nayga, R. M. (2006). Consumers’ use of nutritional labels: A review of research studies and issues. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 9, 1–22.Google Scholar

Duke, J. C., Lee, Y., Kim, A., Watson, K., Arnold, K., Nonnemaker, J., & Porter, L. (2014). Exposure to electronic cigarette television advertisements among youth and young adults. Pediatrics, 143(July), 1–8.Google Scholar

Duprey, Rich (2014). The e-cig market grows up. Motley Fool, March 26. Retrieved from www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/03/26/e-cig-market-grows-up.aspx.Google Scholar

Durkin, T. A., & Elliehausen, G. (2011). Truth in Lending: Theory, History, and a Way Forward. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dutra, L. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2014). Electronic cigarettes and conventional cigarette use among U.S. adolescents: A cross-sectional study. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(7), 610–617.Google Scholar

Dzhogleva, H., & Inman, J. (2013). Healthy choice: The effect of simplified POS nutritional information on consumer choice behavior. Working Paper.Google Scholar

Emery, L. F., Romer, D., Sheerin, K., Jamieson, K. H., & Peters, E. (2013). Affective and cognitive mediators of the impact of cigarette warning labels. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, August 14. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntt124.Google Scholar

Etter, J. F., Bullen, C., Flouris, A. D., Laugesen, M., & Eissenberg, T. (2011). Electronic nicotine delivery systems: A research agenda. Tobacco Control, 20(3), 243–248.Google Scholar

Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA) (2009). Pub. Law No. 625 110 U.S.C.. § 900-302.Google Scholar

FDA (Food and Drug Adminstration) (2009a). Patient and physician attitudes and behaviors associated with DTC promotion of prescription drugs – summary of FDA survey research results. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/ScienceResearch/ResearchAreas/DrugMarketingAdvertisingandCommunicationsResearch/UCM152860.pdf%29.Google Scholar

FDA (Food and Drug Adminstration) (2009b). Experimental study of qualified health claims: Consumer inferences about monounsaturated fatty acids from olive oil, EPA and DHA Omega-3 fatty acids, and green tea. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/LabelingNutrition/ucm207549.htm.Google Scholar

FDA (Food and Drug Adminstration) (2012). Less risky tobacco product? Only if the science says so. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm297895.htm.Google Scholar

FDA (Food and Drug Adminstration) (2014a). Extending authorities to additional tobacco products. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/Labeling/ucm388395.htm.Google Scholar

FDA (Food and Drug Adminstration) (2014b). FDA proposes updates to nutrition facts label on food packages. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm387418.htm.Google Scholar

FDA (Food and Drug Adminstration) (2014c). FDA to teens: Consider “real cost” of tobacco use. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm383887.htm.Google Scholar

FDA (Food and Drug Adminstration) (2014d). The real cost campaign. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/aboutfda/centersoffices/officeofmedicalproductsandtobacco/aboutthecenterfortobaccoproducts/publiceducationcampaigns/therealcostcampaign/default.htm.Google Scholar

Federal Register (2010a). Disclosure of nutrient content information for standard menu items offered for sale at chain restaurants or similar retail food establishments and for articles of food sold from vending machines. Federal Register 75:129 (July 7), 39026–39028.Google Scholar

Federal Register (2010b). Front-of-pack and shelf tag nutrition symbols; establishment of docket: Request for comments and information. Federal Register, 75:82 (April 29), 22602–22606.Google Scholar

Federal Register (2011). Food labeling: Nutrition labeling of standard menu items in restaurants and similar retail food establishments. Federal Register, 76(66, April 6), 19192–19236.Google Scholar

Federal Register (2014). Food labeling: Revision of the nutrition and supplement facts labels. Federal Register, 79(FR 11879, March 3), 11879–11987.Google Scholar

FTC (Federal Trade Commission) (2006). Comments of the staff in the matter of assessing consumer perceptions of health claims, public meeting; request for comments. Docket No. 2005N-0413. Accessed May 30, 2012. Retrieved from www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/05n0413 /05n-0413_emc0004-03.pdf.Google Scholar

Frosch, D., & Grande, D. (2010). Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, 15(3). Retrieved from http://ldihealtheconomist.com/media/direct-to-consumer-advertising-of-prescription-drugs.original.pdf.Google Scholar

Garrison, R. W. (2012). Natural rates of interest and sustainable growth. Cato Journal, 32(2), 423–437.Google Scholar

Goniewicz, M., Knysak, J., Gawron, M., Kosmider, L., Sobczak, A., Kurek, J., Prokopowicz, A., Jablonska-Czapla, M., Rosik-Dulewska, C., Havel, C., Peyton, J., & Benowitz, N. (2013). Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tobacco Control, March 6, 1–7. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859.Google Scholar

Goniewicz, M., Lingas, E., & Hajek, P. (2013). Patterns of electronic cigarette use and user beliefs about their safety and benefits: An Internet survey. Drug Alcohol Review, 32(2), 133–140.Google Scholar

Grana, R., Benowitz, N., & Glantz, S. (2014). E-cigarettes: A scientific review. Circulation, 129, 1972–1986. Retrieved from http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/129/19/1972.full.Google Scholar

Haar, M. V. (2014) Update: Ongoing CTP regulatory issues. Tobacco E-News. Retrieved from www.cspnet.com/category-news/tobacco/articles/update-ongoing-ctp-regulatory-issues.Google Scholar

Hammond, D., Fong, G. T., McDonald, P. W., Brown, K. S., & Cameron, R. (2004). Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: Evidence from Canadian smokers. American Journal of Public Health, 94(8), 1442–1445. doi:10.2105/AJPH.94.8.1442.Google Scholar

Hammond, R. A., & Levine, R. (2010). The economic impact of obesity in the United States. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, 3, 285–295. doi:10.2147/DMSOTT.S7384.Google Scholar

Harris, G. (2012). White House and the F.D.A. often at odds. New York Times, April 2. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/health/policy/white-house-and-fda-at-odds-on-regulatory-issues.html?_r=2&.Google Scholar

Hasler, C. M. (2008). Health claims in the United States: An aid to the public or a source of confusion? Journal of Nutrition. 138(6), 1216S.Google Scholar

Hersey, J. C., Wohlgenant, K. C., Arsenault, J. E., Kosa, K. M., & Muth, M. K. (2013). Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers. Nutrition Reviews, 71(1), 1–14. doi:10.1111/nure.12000.Google Scholar

Hieke, S., & Taylor, C. (2012). A critical review of the literature on nutritional labeling. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 46(1), 120–156. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2011.01219.x.Google Scholar

Howlett, E. A., Burton, S., Bates, K., & Huggins, K. (2009). Coming to a restaurant near you? Potential consumer responses to nutrition information disclosure on menus. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 494–503. doi:10.1086/598799.Google Scholar

Institute of Medicine (2011). Examination of Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols, October 18. Retrieved from www.iom.edu/Activities/Nutrition/NutritionSymbols.aspx.Google Scholar

International Food Information Council (2011). Front of Pack Labeling Consumer Research Project. Retrieved from www.foodinsight.org/Content/3651/IFIC%20FOP%20SLIDES%20for%20WEB2011.pdf.Google Scholar

International Food Information Council (2012). 2012 Food & Health Survey: Consumer Attitudes toward Food Safety, Nutrition & Health. Retrieved from www.foodinsight.org /Resources/Detail.aspx?topic=2012_Food_ Health_Survey_Consumer_Attitudes_ toward_Food_Safety_Nutrition_and_Health.Google Scholar

Jha, P. (2009). Avoidable global cancer deaths and total deaths from smoking. Nature Reviews Cancer, 9(9), 655–664. doi:10.1038/nrc2703.Google Scholar

Kees, J., Andrews, J. C., & Kozup, J. (2010). Understanding how graphic pictorial warnings work on cigarette packaging. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29(2), 265–276. doi:10.1509/jppm.29.2.265.Google Scholar

Kees, J., Burton, S., Andrews, J. C., & Kozup, J. (2006). Tests of graphic visuals and cigarette package warning combinations: Implications for the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(2), 212–223. doi:10.1509/jppm.25.2.212.Google Scholar

Kees, J., Stafford, M., & Cho, Y. (2014). Regulating front-of-package nutrition information disclosures: A test of industry self-regulation versus other popular options. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 48(1), 147–174.Google Scholar

Kessler, D. A., Natanblut, S. L., Wilkenfeld, J. P., Lorraine, C. C., Mayl, S. L., Bernstein, I. B., & Thompson, L. (1997). Nicotine addiction: A pediatric disease. Journal of Pediatrics, 130(4), 518–524. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(97)70232-4.Google Scholar

Kiszko, K., Martinez, O., Abrams, C., & Elbel, B. (2014). The influence of calorie labeling on food orders and consumption: A review of the literature. Journal of Community Health, 39(6), 1248–1269.Google Scholar

Kozup, J. C., Creyer, E. H., & Burton, S. (2003). Making healthful food choices: The influence of health claims and nutrition information on consumers’ evaluations of packaged food products and restaurant menu items. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 19–34. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.19.18608.Google Scholar

Lacko, James M., & Pappalardo, Janis K. (2010). The failure and promise of mandated consumer mortgage disclosures: Evidence from qualitative interviews and a controlled experiment with mortgage borrowers. American Economic Review, 100(2): 516–521.Google Scholar

Lee, S., Grana, R. A., & Glantz, S. A. (2014). Electronic cigarette use among Korean adolescents: A cross-sectional study of market penetration, dual use, and relationship to quit attempts and former smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 54(6), 684–690. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.003.Google Scholar

Lee, Y. O., Hebert, C. J., Nonnemaker, J. M., & Kim, A. E. (2014). Multiple tobacco product use among adults in the United States: Cigarettes, cigars, electronic cigarettes, hookah, smokeless tobacco, and snus. Preventive Medicine, 62, 14–19. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.014.Google Scholar

Mason, M. J., Scammon, D. L., & Fang, X. (2007). The impact of warnings, disclaimers, and product experience on consumers’ perceptions of dietary supplements. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 74–99.Google Scholar

Mayhew, K. P., Flay, B. R., & Mott, J. A. (2000). Stages in the development of adolescent smoking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 59, 61–81. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00165-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maynard, O. M., Attwood, A., O’Brien, L., Brooks, S., Hedge, C., Leonards, U., & Munafò, M. R. (2014). Avoidance of cigarette pack health warnings among regular cigarette smokers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 136, 170–174. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.01.001.Google Scholar

McGuire, W. J. (1980). The communication-persuasion model and health-risk labeling. In Morris, L. A., Mazis, M. B., & Barofsky, I. (eds.), Banbury Report 6: Product Labeling and Health Risks (pp. 99–119). Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.Google Scholar

Menon, A. M., Deshpande, A. D., Perri, III, M., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2003). Consumers’ attention to the brief summary in print direct-to-consumer advertisements: Perceived usefulness in patient–physician discussions. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22(2), 181.Google Scholar

Morris, L. A., Mazis, M. B., & Barofsky, I. (eds.), (1980). Banbury Report 6: Product Labeling and Health Risks. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.Google Scholar

Munafo, M. R., Roberts, N., Bauld, L., & Leonards, U. (2011). Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers. Addiction, 106(8), 1505–1510.Google Scholar

Myers, M. (2013). Government’s Decision Not to Appeal Cigarette Warning Ruling Is Disappointing: FDA Should Quickly Develop New Set of Graphic Warnings. March 19. Washington, DC: Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Retrieved from www.tobaccofreekids.org/press_releases /post/2013_03_19_fda.Google Scholar

National Institutes of Health (2014). What are overweight and obesity? Retrieved from www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/obe/.Google Scholar

Navarro-Martinez, D., Salisbury, L. C., Lemon, K. N., Steward, N., Matthews, W. J., & Harris, A. J. L (2011). Minimum required payment and supplemental information disclosure effects on consumer debt repayment decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 60–77.Google Scholar

Newman, C. L., Howlett, E., & Burton, S. (2014). Shopper response to front-of-package nutrition labeling programs: Potential consumer and retail store benefits. Journal of Retailing, 90(1), 13–26. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2013.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nonnemaker, J., Farrelly, M., Kamyab, K., Busey, A., & Mann, N. (2010). Experimental Study of Graphic Cigarette Warning Labels. Research Triangle Park,NC: RTI International. Retrieved from www.tobaccolabels.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/USA-2010-Experimental-Study-of-Graphic-Cigarette-Warning-Labels-Final-Results-Report-FDA.pdf.Google Scholar

Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) (1990). Public Law No. 101-535, 104 Stat. 2353 (codified in part at 21 U.S.C. 343).Google Scholar

Parker, J. R., & Lehmann, D. R. (2014). How and when grouping low-calorie options reduces the benefits of providing dish-specific calorie information. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 213–235. doi:10.1086/675738.Google Scholar

Pepper, J. K., Cameron, L. D., Reiter, P. L., McRee, A., & Brewer, N. T. (2013). Non-smoking male adolescents’ reactions to cigarette warnings: E65533. PLoS One, 8(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065533.Google Scholar

Peters, E., Romer, D., Slovic, P., Jamieson, K. H., Wharfield, L., & Mertz, C. K., (2007). The impact and acceptability of Canadian-Style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 9(4), 473–481.Google Scholar

Petty, Richard E., & Cacioppo, John T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Pokhrel, P., Pebbles, F., Melissa, A. L., Crissy, T. K., & Herzog, T.A. (2013). Smokers who try e-cigarettes to quit smoking: Findings from a multiethnic study in Hawaii. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 9.Google Scholar

Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 390–395. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390.Google Scholar

Riker, C. A., Lee, K., Darville, A., & Hahn, E. J. (2012). E-cigarettes: Promise or peril? Nursing Clinics of North America, 47(1), 159–171. doi:10.1016/j.cnur.2011.10.002.Google Scholar

Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitudinal change. Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 93–114.Google Scholar

Romer, D., Peters, E., Strasser, A. A., & Langleben, D. (2013). Desire versus efficacy in smokers’ paradoxical reactions to pictorial health warnings for cigarettes. PloS one, 8(1), e54937.Google Scholar

Siegel, M., & Biener, L. (2000). The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: Results of a longitudinal youth study. American Journal of Public Health, 90(3), 380–386. doi:10.2105/AJPH.90.3.380.Google Scholar

Siegel, M. B., Tanwar, K. L., & Wood, K. S. (2011). Electronic cigarettes as a smoking-cessation: Tool results from an online survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(4), 472.Google Scholar

Stewart, D. W., & Martin, I. M. (1994). Intended and unintended consequences of warning messages: A review and synthesis of empirical research. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13, 1–19.Google Scholar

Strahan, E. J., White, K., Fong, G. T., Fabrigar, L. R., Zanna, M. P., & Cameron, R. (2002). Enhancing the effectiveness of tobacco package warning labels: A social psychological perspective. Tobacco Control, 11(3), 183–190. doi:10.1136/tc.11.3.183.Google Scholar

Strasser, A. A., Tang, K. Z., Romer, D., Jepson, C., & Cappella, J. N. (2012). Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements: Recall and viewing patterns. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(1), 41–47. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.026.Google Scholar

Surgeon General Report (2012). Preventing Tobacco Use among Youth and Young Adults. Retrieved from www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-use/.Google Scholar

Synovate (2005). Quantitative Evaluation of Alternative Food Signposting Concepts: Report of Findings. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20131104005023/www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/signpostquanresearch.pdf.Google Scholar

U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010). Public Law 111-148. Stat. 119 through 124.Google Scholar

U.S. Surgeon General (2013). Overweight and Obesity: Health Consequences. Retrieved from www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/calls/obesity/fact_consequences.html.Google Scholar

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2014). The Health Consequences of Smoking – 50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar

Viswanathan, M., & Hastak, M. (2002). The role of summary information in facilitating consumers’ comprehension of nutrition information. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(2), 305–318. doi:10.1509/jppm.21.2.305.17596.Google Scholar

Wall Street Journal (2014). Big tobacco’s e-cigarette push gets a reality check. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/articles/big-tobaccos-e-cig-push-gets-a-reality-check-1409078319.Google Scholar

Wang, A., Romer, D., Elman, I., Turetsky, B., Gur, R., & Langleben, D. (2013). Emotional graphic cigarette warning labels reduce the electrophysiological brain response to smoking cues. Addiction Biology Available online December 15. doi: 10.1111/adb.12117.Google Scholar

Wansink, B., & Chandon, P. (2006). Can “low-fat” nutrition labels lead to obesity? Journal of Marketing Research, 43(4), 605–617. doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.4.605.Google Scholar

Wogalter, M. S. (2006). The communication-human information processing (C-HIP) model. In Wogalter, M. S. (ed.), Handbook of Warnings (pp. 51–61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Woodward, R. E., & Hall, S. E. (2010). The burden of the nondiversifiable risk of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 100(3), 1163–1194.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (WHO) (2014). WHO FCTC Health Warnings Database. Geneva: WHO. Retrieved from www.who.int/tobacco/healthwarningsdatabase/en/.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (WHO) (2014). Obesity and Overweight. Geneva: WHO. Retrieved from www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/.Google Scholar

Wosinka, M. (2005). Direct-to-consumer advertising and drug therapy compliance. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(3), 323–332.Google Scholar

Zhao, X., Nan, X., Yang, B., & Iles, I. A. (2014). Cigarette warning labels: Graphics, framing, and identity. Health Education, 114(2), 101–117. doi:10.1108/HE-06-2013-0024.Google Scholar

Abeler, J., & Jäger, S. (in press). Complex tax incentives. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy.Google Scholar

Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 465–490.Google Scholar

Alexander, D., & Andersen, K. (1993). Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 527–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3), 323–338.Google Scholar

Alm, J. (2012). Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: Lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies. International Tax and Public Finance, 19(1), 54–77.Google Scholar

Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., & Schulze, W. D. (1992). Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48(1), 21–38.Google Scholar

Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., & Schulze, W. D. (1999). Changing the social norm of tax compliance by voting. Kyklos, 52(2), 141–171.Google Scholar

Alvarez, R. M., & McCaffery, E. J. (2003). Are there sex differences in fiscal political preferences? Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 5–17.Google Scholar

Anderson, E. T., Fong, N. M., Simester, D. I., & Tucker, C. E. (2010). How sales taxes affect customer and firm behavior: The role of search on the Internet. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 229–239.Google Scholar

Andreoni, J. (1993). An experimental test of the public-goods crowding-out hypothesis. American Economic Review, 83(5), 1317–1327.Google Scholar

Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 818–860.Google Scholar

Andreoni, J., & Payne, A. A. (2011). Is crowding out due entirely to fundraising? Evidence from a panel of charities. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5), 334–343.Google Scholar

Azagba, S., & Sharaf, M. (2011). Cigarette taxes and smoking participation: Evidence from recent tax increases in Canada. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(5), 1583–1600.Google Scholar

Baird, J. E., Zelin, I. I., Robert, C., & Brennan, P. J. (2011). Academic major, gender, personal values, and reactions to an ethical dilemma. Journal of Business Case Studies, 2(2), 73–82.Google Scholar

Baugh, B., Ben-David, I., & Park, H. (2014). The “Amazon Tax”: Empirical evidence from Amazon and main street retailers. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Bazart, C., & Bonein, A. (2014). Reciprocal relationships in tax compliance decisions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40(C), 83–102.Google Scholar

Becchetti, L., Degli Antoni, G., Ottone, S., & Solferino, N. (2013). Allocation criteria under task performance: The gendered preference for protection. Journal of Socio-Economics, 45, 96–111.Google Scholar

Bergstrom, T. C., Blume, L. E., Varian, H. R. (1986). On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 29(1), 25–49.Google Scholar

Bernheim, B. D. (2002). Taxation and saving. Handbook of Public Economics, 3, 1173–1249.Google Scholar

Bhattacharjee, A., Dana, J., & Baron, J. (under review). Can profit be good? Neglect of incentives and anti-profit beliefs.Google Scholar

Bø, E. E., Slemrod, J., & Thoresen, T. O. (2015). Taxes on the Internet: Deterrence effects of public disclosure. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(1), 36–62.Google Scholar

Bobek, D. D., & Hatfield, R. C. (2003). An investigation of the theory of planned behavior and the role of moral obligation in tax compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15(1), 13–38.Google Scholar

Borghans, L., Heckman, J. J., Golsteyn, B. H. H., & Meijers, H. (2009). Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2–3), 649–658.Google Scholar

Bovenberg, A. L., & Goulder, L. H. (1996). Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: General-equilibrium analyses. American Economic Review, 86(4), 985–1000.Google Scholar

Bracha, A., & Cooper, D. (2014). Asymmetric responses to income changes: The payroll tax increase versus tax refund in 2013. Economics Letters, 124(3), 534–538.Google Scholar

Brannlund, R., & Persson, L. (2012). To tax, or not to tax: Preferences for climate policy attributes. Climate Policy, 12(6), 704–721.Google Scholar

Brooks, N., & Doob, A. N. (1990). Tax evasion: Searching for a theory of compliant behavior. In Friedland, M.L. (ed.), Securing Compliance: Seven Case Studies (pp. 120–164). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Brownell, K. D., Farley, T., Willett, W. C., Popkin, B. M., Chaloupka, F. J., Thompson, J. W., & Ludwig, D. S. (2009). The public health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(16), 1599–1605.Google Scholar

Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383.Google Scholar

Cabral, M., & Hoxby, C. (2012). The hated property tax: Salience, tax rates, and tax tevolts. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Chaloupka, F. J., & Pacula, R. L. (1999). Sex and race differences in young people’s responsiveness to price and tobacco control policies. Tobacco Control, 8(4), 373–377.Google Scholar

Chaloupka, F. J., Straif, K., & Leon, M. E. (2011). Effectiveness of tax and price policies in tobacco control. Tobacco Control, 20, 235–238.Google Scholar

Chamley, C. (1986). Optimal taxation of capital income in general equilibrium with infinite lives. Econometrica, 80(3), 607–622.Google Scholar

Chan, K. S., Godby, R., Mestelman, S., & Muller, R. A. (2002). Crowding-out voluntary contributions to public goods. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48(3), 305–317.Google Scholar

Chang, C., & Hitchon, J. C. B. (2004). When does gender count? Further insights into gender schematic processing of female candidates’ political advertisements. Sex Roles, 51(3–4), 197–208.Google Scholar

Chang, O. H., Nichols, D. R., & Schultz, J. J. (1987). Taxpayer attitudes toward tax audit risk. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8(3), 299–309.Google Scholar

Chetty, R., Looney, A., & Kroft, K. (2009). Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1145–1177.Google Scholar

Chow, R. M., & Galak, J. (2012). The effect of inequality frames on support for redistributive tax policies. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1467–1469.Google Scholar

Chung, J., & Trivedi, V. U. (2003). The effect of friendly persuasion and gender on tax compliance behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(2), 133–145.Google Scholar

Coricelli, G., Rusconi, E., & Villeval, M. C. (2014). Tax evasion and emotions: An empirical test of re-integrative shaming theory. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40(C), 49–61.Google Scholar

Crockett, D., & Wallendorf, M. (2004). The role of normative political ideology in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 511–528.Google Scholar

Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.Google Scholar

Cullis, J., Jones, P., & Lewis, A. (2006). Tax framing, instrumentality and individual differences: Are there two different cultures? Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 304–320.Google Scholar

Cullis, J., Jones, P., & Savoia, A. (2012). Social norms and tax compliance: Framing the decision to pay tax. Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(2), 159–168.Google Scholar

DeAngelo, H., & Masulis, R. W. (1980). Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(1), 3–29.Google Scholar

DeCicca, P., Kenkel, D., & Liu, F. (2013). Excise tax avoidance: The case of state cigarette taxes. Journal of Health Economics, 32(6), 1130–1141.Google Scholar

De Juan, A., Lasheras, M. A., & Mayo, R. (1994). Voluntary tax compliant behavior of Spanish income tax payers. Public Finance, 49, 90–105.Google Scholar

Diamond, P. A., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1971a). Optimal taxation and public production I: Production efficiency. American Economic Review, 61(1), 8–27.Google Scholar

Diamond, P. A., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1971b). Optimal taxation and public production II: Tax rules. American Economic Review, 61(3), 261–278.Google Scholar

Dixit, A., & Londregan, J. (1998). Ideology, tactics, and efficiency in redistributive politics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 497–529.Google Scholar

Djanali, I., & Sheehan-Connor, D. (2012). Tax affinity hypothesis: Do we really hate paying taxes? Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(4), 758–775.Google Scholar

Dyreng, S., Hoopes, J. L., & Wilde, J. H. (2014). Public pressure and corporate tax behavior. Working Paper, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J., & Johnston, R. M. (2005). An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1543–1560.Google Scholar

Einav, L., Knoepfle, D., Levin, J., & Sundaresan, N. (2014). Sales taxes and Internet commerce. American Economic Review, 104(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Epstein, L. H., Dearing, K. K., Roba, L. G., & Finkelstein, E. (2010). The influence of taxes and subsidies on energy purchased in an experimental purchasing study. Psychological Science, 21(3), 406–414.Google Scholar

Eriksen, K., & Fallan, L. (1996). Tax knowledge and attitudes towards taxation: A report on a quasi-experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(3), 387–402.Google Scholar

Farrelly, M. C., Bray, J. W., Pechacek, T., & Woollery, T. (2001). Response by adults to increases in cigarette prices by sociodemographic characteristics. Southern Economic Journal, 68(1), 156–165.Google Scholar

Feenberg, D. R., & Poterba, J. M. (1991). Which households own municipal bonds? Evidence from tax returns. National Tax Journal, 44(4), 93–103.Google Scholar

Filippin, A., & Crosetto, P. (2014). A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes. Working Paper, University of Milan.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, A. (2009). EZ-Tax: Tax salience and tax rates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 969–1010.Google Scholar

Goldin, J. (2012). Sales tax not included: Designing commodity taxes for inattentive consumers. Yale Law Journal, 122(1), 258–301.Google Scholar

Goldin, J. (2014). Optimal tax salience. Unpublished Manuscript, Yale Law School and Princeton University.Google Scholar

Goldin, J., & Homonoff, T. (2013). Smoke gets in your eyes: Cigarette tax salience and regressivity. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(1), 302–336.Google Scholar

Goldin, J., & Listokin, Y. (2014). Tax expenditure salience. American Law and Economics Review, 16(1), 144–176.Google Scholar

Goolsbee, A. (2000). In a world without borders: The impact of taxes on Internet commerce. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(2), 561–576.Google Scholar

Grasmick, H. G., & Bursik, R. J. Jr. (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law and Society Review, 24(3), 837–861.Google Scholar

Greenberg, S. B., & Greenberg, A. (2013). Public interests project frequency questionnaire, October 21–26, 2003. Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research.Google Scholar

Gronberg, T. J., Luccasen, R. A. III, Turocy, T. L., & Van Huyck, J. B. (2012). Are tax-financed contributions to a public good completely crowded-out? Experimental evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 96(7), 596–603.Google Scholar

Gruber, J. H., & Mullainathan, S. (2005). Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier? B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 5(1), 1–45.Google Scholar

Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science, 316(5831), 1622–1625.Google Scholar

Hardisty, D. J., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2010). A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological Science, 21(1), 86–92.Google Scholar

Hasseldine, J., & Hite, P. A. (2003). Framing, gender and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 517–533.Google Scholar

Hasseldine, D. J., Kaplan, S. E., & Fuller, L. R. (1994). Characteristics of New Zealand tax evaders: A note. Accounting & Finance, 34(2), 79–93.Google Scholar

Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [HMRC] (2012). Budget 2012. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk.Google Scholar

Hersch, J. (2000). Gender, income levels, and the demand for cigarettes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 21(2–3), 263–282.Google Scholar

Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 37(3), 297–307.Google Scholar

Hill, C. A. (2010). What cognitive psychologists should find interesting about tax. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(2), 180–185.Google Scholar

Hines, J. R. (2007). Taxing consumption and other sins. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 49–68.Google Scholar

Homonoff, T. A. (2013). Can small incentives have large effects? The impact of taxes versus bonuses on disposable bag use. Working Paper, Princeton University.Google Scholar

Hu, Y. J., & Tang, Z. (2014). The impact of sales tax on internet and catalog sales: Evidence from a natural experiment. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 32, 84–90.Google Scholar

Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 119–147.Google Scholar

Internal Revenue Service [IRS] (2012). Tax gap for tax year 2006 overview. Retrieved from www.irs.gov/pub/newsroom/overview_tax_gap_2006.pdf.Google Scholar

Jackson, B. R., & Milliron, V. C. (1986). Tax compliance research: Findings, problems and prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature, 5, 125–166.Google Scholar

Jha, P., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2000). The economics of global tobacco control. British Medical Journal, 321, 358–361.Google Scholar

Jung, Y. H., Snow, A., & Trandel, G. A. (1994). Tax evasion and the size of the underground economy. Journal of Public Economics, 54, 391–402.Google Scholar

Kahn, K. F. (1993). Gender differences in campaign messages: The political advertisements of men and women candidates for US Senate. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 481–502.Google Scholar

Kesselman, J. R. (1989). Income tax evasion: An inter-sectoral analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 38, 137–182.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (eds.). (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kasper, M., Kogler, C., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Tax policy and the news: An empirical analysis of taxpayers’ perceptions of tax-related media coverage and its impact on tax compliance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 54, 58–63.Google Scholar

Kastlunger, B., Dressler, S. G., Kirchler, E., Mittone, L., & Voracek, M. (2010). Sex differences in tax compliance: Differentiating between demographic sex, gender-role orientation, and prenatal masculinization (2D:4D). Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(4), 542–552.Google Scholar

Katz, M. A. (2011). The politics of purchasing: Ethical consumerism, civic engagement, and political participation in the United States. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E. (2007). The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E., Maciejovsky, B., & Schneider, F. (2003). Everyday representations of tax avoidance, tax evasion, and tax flight: Do legal differences matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 535–553.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E., Muehlbacher, S., Kastlunger, B., & Wahl, I. (2010). Why pay taxes? A review of tax compliance decisions. In Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Torgler, B. (eds.), Developing Alternative Frameworks for Explaining Tax Compliance (pp.15–32). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kite, M. E., Deaux, K., & Haines, E. L. (2008). Gender stereotypes. In Denmark, F. L. & Paludi, M. A. (eds.), Psychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and Theories, 2nd ed. (pp. 205–236). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Lamberton, C. (2013). A spoonful of choice: How allocation increases satisfaction with tax payments. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32(2), 223–238.Google Scholar

Lamberton, C. P., De Neve, J., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Eliciting taxpayer preferences increases tax compliance. Working Paper, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

LeBoeuf, R. A., & Shafir, E. (2003). Deep thoughts and shallow frames: On the susceptibility to framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(2), 77–92.Google Scholar

Lippa, R. A. (2005). Gender, Nature, and Nurture, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Manuszak, M. D., & Moul, C. C. (2009). How far for a buck? Tax differences and the location of retail gasoline activity in Southeast Chicagoland. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(4), 744–765.Google Scholar

Manzoor, S. H., & Straub, J. D. (2005). The robustness of Kingma’s crowd-out estimate: Evidence from new data on contributions to public radio. Public Choice, 123(3–4), 463–476.Google Scholar

Markowitz, S., & Grossman, M. (2000). The effects of beer taxes on physical child abuse. Journal of Health Economics, 19(2), 271–282.Google Scholar

McCaffery, E. J. (1994). The uneasy case for wealth transfer taxation. Yale Law Journal, 104(2), 283–365.Google Scholar

McCaffery, E. J., & Baron, J. (2004). Framing and taxation: Evaluation of tax policies involving household composition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(6), 679–705.Google Scholar

McCaffery, E. J., & Slemrod, J. (2006). Toward an agenda for behavioral public finance. In McCaffery, E. J. & Slemrod, J. (eds.), Behavioral Public Finance (pp. 3–31). New York: Sage.Google Scholar

McGowan, J. R. (2000). The effect of political affiliation on taxpayers’ attitudes toward alternative tax systems. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 22(1), 111–128.Google Scholar

Mettler, S. (2011). The Submerged State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Miles, M. R. (2014). Process over outcome: How perceptions of procedural fairness influence conservative support for redistributive taxes. Social Science Journal, 51(4), 615–626.Google Scholar

Newman, B. J., & Bartels, B. L. (2011). Politics at the checkout line: Explaining political consumerism in the United States. Political Research Quarterly, 64(4), 803–817.Google Scholar

Nonnemaker, J. M., & Farrelly, M. C. (2011). Smoking initiation among youth: The role of cigarette excise taxes and prices by race/ethnicity and gender. Journal of Health Economics, 30(3), 560–567.Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Studying optimal paternalism, illustrated by a model of sin taxes. American Economic Review, 93(2), 186–191.Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2006). Optimal sin taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 90(10), 1825–1849.Google Scholar

OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2013). What drives tax morale? Retrieved from www.oecd.org/ctp/tax-global/TaxMorale_march13.pdf.Google Scholar

Olivola, C. Y., Kim, Y., Merzel, A., Kareev, Y., Avrahami, J., & Ritov, I. (2014). Diffusion of responsibility across cultures and contexts: The impact of individual, cultural, and contextual factors on responses to the Volunteer’s Dilemma Game. Unpublished Manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar

Olivola, C. Y., & Sussman, A. B. (2014). Many behavioral tendencies associated with right-leaning (conservative) political ideologies are malleable and unrelated to negativity. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 37(3), 323–324.Google Scholar

Orviska, M., & Hudson, J. (2002). Tax evasion, civic duty and the law abiding citizen. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(1), 83–102.Google Scholar

Parker, S. C. (2003). Does tax evasion affect occupational choice? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 379–394.Google Scholar

Payne, A. A. (1998). Does the government crowd-out private donations? New evidence from a sample of non-profit firms. Journal of Public Economics, 69(3), 323–345.Google Scholar

Pestieau, P., & Possen, U. M. (1991). Tax evasion and occupational choice. Journal of Public Economics, 45, 107–125.Google Scholar

Pestieau, P., & Possen, U. M. (1992). How do taxes affect occupational choice? Public Finance, 47, 108–119.Google Scholar

Pickhardt, M., & Prinz, A. (2014). Behavioral dynamics of tax evasion – A survey. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 1–19.Google Scholar

Piketty, T. (1995). Social mobility and redistributive politics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 551–584.Google Scholar

Porcano, T. M. (1988). Correlates of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(1), 47–67.Google Scholar

Poterba, J. M. (2002). Taxation, risk-taking, and household portfolio behavior. Handbook of Public Economics, 3, 1109–1171.Google Scholar

Prinz, A., Muehlbacher, S., & Kirchler, E. (2014). The slippery slope framework on tax compliance: An attempt to formalization. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 20–34.Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. P. (1927). A contribution to the theory of taxation. Economic Journal, 37(145), 47–61.Google Scholar

Reckers, P. M., Sanders, D. L., & Roark, S. J. (1994). The influence of ethical attitudes on taxpayer compliance. National Tax Journal, 47(4), 825–836.Google Scholar

Reimers, S. (2009). A paycheck half-empty or half-full? Framing, fairness and progressive taxation. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(6), 461–466.Google Scholar

Rivers, N., & Schaufele, B. (2014). Salience of carbon taxes in the gasoline market. Working Paper, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar

Roos, J. M. T., & Shachar, R. (2014). When Kerry met Sally: Politics and perceptions in the demand for movies. Management Science, 60(7), 1617–1631.Google Scholar

Sausgruber, R., & Tyran, J. R. (2014). Discriminatory taxes are unpopular—even when they are efficient and distributionally fair. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 108, 463–476.Google Scholar

Schepanski, A., & Shearer, T. (1995). A prospect theory account of the income tax withholding phenomenon. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 174–186.Google Scholar

Schmölders, G. (1959). Fiscal psychology: A new branch of public finance. National Tax Journal, 12(4), 340–345.Google Scholar

Scholz, J. T., & Lubell, M. (1998). Adaptive political attitudes: Duty, trust, and fear as monitors of tax policy. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 903–920.Google Scholar

Schwartz, R., & Orleans, S. (1967). On legal sanctions. University of Chicago Law Review, 34, 282–300.Google Scholar

Scott, W. J., & Grasmick, H. G. (1981). Deterrence and income tax cheating: Testing interaction hypotheses in utilitarian theories. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17(3), 395–408.Google Scholar

Shah, A. M., Bettman, J. R., Ubel, P. A., Keller, P. A., & Britton, J. E. (2014). Surcharges plus unhealthy labels reduce demand for unhealthy menu items. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(6), 773–789.Google Scholar

Shu, L. L., Mazar, N., Gino, F., Ariely, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2012). Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(38), 15197–15200.Google Scholar

Slemrod, J. (2007). Cheating ourselves: The economics of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 25–48.Google Scholar

Soliman, A., Jones, P., & Cullis, J. (2014). Learning in experiments: Dynamic interaction of policy variables designed to deter tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 175–186.Google Scholar

Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. (1995). Masculinity and femininity: Defining the undefinable. In Kalbfleisch, P. J. & Cody, M. J. (eds.), Gender, Power, and Communication in Human Relationships (pp. 105–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Spicer, M. W. (1986). Civilization at a discount: The problem of tax evasion. National Tax Journal, 39(1), 13–20.Google Scholar

Spicer, M. W., & Lundstedt, S. B. (1976). Understanding tax evasion. Public Finance, 31, 295–305.Google Scholar

Stehr, M. (2007). The effect of cigarette taxes on smoking among men and women. Health Economics, 16(12), 1333–1343.Google Scholar

Steinberg, R. (1991). Does government spending crowd out donations? Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62(4), 591–612.Google Scholar

Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1–26.Google Scholar

Sussman, A. B., & Olivola, C. Y. (2011). Axe the tax: Taxes are disliked more than equivalent costs. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, S91–S101.Google Scholar

Tan, F., & Yim, A. (2014). Can strategic uncertainty help deter tax evasion? An experiment on auditing rules. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40(C), 161–174.Google Scholar

Torgler, B. (2003). To evade taxes or not to evade: That is the question. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(3), 283–302.Google Scholar

Torgler, B. (2007). Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Torgler, B., & Valev, N. T. (2010). Gender and public attitudes toward corruption and tax evasion. Contemporary Economic Policy, 28(4), 554–568.Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.Google Scholar

Verboon, P., & Van Dijke, M. (2007). A self-interest analysis of justice and tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(6), 704–727.Google Scholar

Vesterlund, L., Babcock, L., & Weingart, L. (2014). Breaking the glass ceiling with “no”: Gender differences in declining requests for non-promotable tasks. Unpublished Manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar

Wagenaar, A. C., Salois, M. J., & Komro, K. A. (2009). Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: A meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies. Addiction, 104(2), 179–190.Google Scholar

Wahl, I., Kastlunger, B., & Kirchler, E. (2010). Trust in authorities and power to enforce tax compliance: An empirical analysis of the “Slippery Slope Framework.” Law & Policy, 32(4), 383–406.Google Scholar

Wahlund, R. (1992). Tax changes and economic behavior: The case of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 657–677.Google Scholar

Wallschutzky, I. G. (1984). Possible causes of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 5, 371–384.Google Scholar

Warr, P. G. (1982). Pareto optimal redistribution and private charity. Journal of Public Economics, 19, 131–138.Google Scholar

Watson, H. (1985). Tax evasion and labor markets. Journal of Public Economics, 27, 231–246.Google Scholar

Webley, P., Cole, M., & Eidjar, O.-P. (2001). The prediction of self-reported and hypothetical tax-evasion: Evidence from England, France and Norway. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 141–155.Google Scholar

Wenzel, M. (2004). An analysis of norm processes in tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(2), 213–228.Google Scholar

Wenzel, M. (2005). Misperceptions of social norms about tax compliance: From theory to intervention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(6), 862–883.Google Scholar

Whillans, A. V., Wispinski, N. J., & Dunn, E. W. (under review). Seeing wealth as a responsibility improves attitudes toward taxation.Google Scholar

Winter, N. J. (2010). Masculine Republicans and feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans’ explicit and implicit images of the political parties. Political Behavior, 32(4), 587–618.Google Scholar

Abrams, D. (1994). Political distinctiveness: An identity optimising approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 357–365.Google Scholar

Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167.Google Scholar

Altemeyer, B. (1996). The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human Associative Memory. Washington: V. H. Winston; distributed by the Halsted Press Division of Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., Lim, V. K., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123–141.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., McFerran, B., & Laven, M. (2011). Moral identity and the experience of moral elevation in response to acts of uncommon goodness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 703–718.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., & Reed, A. II (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.Google Scholar

Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.Google Scholar

Barclay, L. J., Whiteside, D. B., & Aquino, K. (2014). To avenge or not to avenge? Exploring the interactive effects of moral identity and the negative reciprocity norm. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 15–28.Google Scholar

Barnea, M., & Schwartz, S. (1998). Values and voting. Political Psychology, 19(1), 17–40.Google Scholar

Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1–62.Google Scholar

Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364.Google Scholar

Blasi, A. (1984). Moral identity: Its role in moral functioning. In Kurtines, W. M. & Gurwitz, J. L. (eds.), Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development (pp. 128–139). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Block, J., & Block, J. H. (2006). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 734–749.Google Scholar

Brooks, A. C. (2006). Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth about Compassionate Conservatism: America’s Charity Divide–Who Gives, Who Doesn’t and Why It Matters. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Buttel, F. M., & Flinn, W. L. (1978) The politics of environmental concern: The impacts of party identification and political ideology on environmental attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 10(1), 17–36.Google Scholar

Choi, W. J., & Winterich, K. P. (2013). Can brands move in from the outside? How moral identity enhances out-group brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 96–111.Google Scholar

Cohrs, J. C., Maes, J., Moschner, B., & Kielmann, S. (2007). Determinants of human rights attitudes and behavior: A comparison and integration of psychological perspectives. Political Psychology, 28(4), 441–469.Google Scholar