Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:49:23.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Consumer Psychology of Groups and Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2023

Edited by
Cait Lamberton ,
Derek D. Rucker  and
Stephen A. Spiller
Cait Lamberton
Affiliation:
Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Derek D. Rucker
Affiliation:
Kellogg School, Northwestern University, Illinois
Stephen A. Spiller
Affiliation:
Anderson School, University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Psychology , pp. 271 - 528
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Albrecht, A. K., Walsh, G., Brach, S., Gremler, D. D., & van Herpen, E. (2017). The influence of service employees and other customers on customer unfriendliness: A social norms perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 827–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral, N. B., & Loken, B. (2016). Viewing usage of counterfeit luxury goods: Social identity and social hierarchy effects on dilution and enhancement of genuine luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 483–495.Google Scholar
Amatulli, C., Peluso, A. M., Guido, G., & Yoon, C. (2018). When feeling younger depends on others: The effects of social cues on older consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 45, 691–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argo, J. J. (2019). A contemporary review of three types of social influence in consumer psychology. Consumer Psychology Review, 3(1), 126–140.Google Scholar
Argo, J. J., & Dahl, D. W. (2018). Standards of beauty: The impact of mannequins in the retail context. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 974–990.Google Scholar
Ariely, D., Gneezy, U., & Haruvy, E. (2018). Social norms and the price of zero. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(2), 180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnould, E. J., Price, L., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2004). Consumers, 2nd ed. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Arvidsson, A., & Caliandro, A. (2016). Brand public. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 727–748.Google Scholar
Ashley, C., & Noble, S. M. (2014). It’s closing time: Territorial behaviors from customers in response to front line employees. Journal of Retailing, 90(1), 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barasch, A., & Berger, J. (2014). Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size affects what people share. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(3), 286–299.Google Scholar
Barasch, A., Zauberman, G., & Diehl, K. (2018). How the intention to share can undermine enjoyment: Photo-taking goals and evaluation of experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1220–1237.Google Scholar
Baskin, E., Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., & Novemsky, N. (2014). Why feasibility matters more to gift receivers than to givers: A construal-level approach to gift giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 169–182.Google Scholar
Bastos, W., & Brucks, M. (2017). How and why conversational value leads to happiness for experiential and material purchases. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 598–612.Google Scholar
Bellezza, S., & Keinan, A. (2014). Brand tourists: How non-core users enhance the brand image by eliciting pride. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 397–417.Google Scholar
Berman, J. Z., Levine, E. E., Barasch, A., & Small, D. A. (2015). The braggart’s dilemma: On the social rewards and penalties of advertising prosocial behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(1), 90–104.Google Scholar
Bickart, B., Morrin, M., & Ratneshwar, S. (2015). Does it pay to beat around the bush? The case of the obfuscating salesperson. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(4), 596–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, S. J., Carlson, K. A., & Hyodo, J. D. (2016). The favor request effect: Requesting a favor from consumers to seal the deal. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 985–1001.Google Scholar
Blanchard, S. J., Dyachenko, T. L., & Kettle, K. L. (2020). Locational choices: Modeling consumer preferences for proximity to others in reserved seating venues. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(5), 878–899.Google Scholar
Boothby, E. J., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2014). Shared experiences are amplified. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2209–2216.Google Scholar
Brannon, D. C., & Samper, A. (2018). Maybe I just got (un)lucky: One-on-one conversations and the malleability of post-consumption product and service evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(4), 810–832.Google Scholar
Brick, D. J., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2017). Oppositional brand choice: Using brands to respond to relationship frustration. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(2), 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryksina, O. (2020). When and why choices for others diverge from consumers’ own salient goals. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(4), 579–597.Google Scholar
Buechel, E., & Berger, J. (2018). Microblogging and the value of undirected communication. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(1), 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascio, C. N., O’Donnell, M. B., Bayer, J., Tinney Jr., F. J., & Falk, E. B. (2015). Neural correlates of susceptibility to group opinions in online word-of-mouth recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 559–575.Google Scholar
Chan, C., & Mogilner, C. (2017). Experiential gifts foster stronger social relationships than material gifts. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 913–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, E., & Briers, B. (2019). It’s the end of the competition: When social comparison is not always motivating for goal achievement. Journal of Consumer Research, 46, 351–730.Google Scholar
Chaney, K. E., Sanchez, D. T., & Maimon, M. R. (2019). Stigmatized-identity cues in consumer spaces. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatzidakis, A., Maclaran, P., & Varman, R. (2021). The regeneration of consumer movement solidarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(2), 289–308.Google Scholar
Chen, R., Zheng, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Fickle men, faithful women: Effects of mating cues on men’s and women’s variety-seeking behavior in consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(2), 275–282.Google Scholar
Chen, R. P., Wan, E. W., & Levy, E. (2017). The effect of social exclusion on consumer preference for anthropomorphized brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 23–34.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Van Der Lans, R., & Phan, T. Q. (2017). Uncovering the importance of relationship characteristics in social networks: Implications for seeding strategies. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(2), 187–201.Google Scholar
Chen, Y.‐J., & Kirmani, A. (2015). Posting strategically: The consumer as an online media planner. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(4), 609–621.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. (2017). Social acceptance and word of mouth: How the motive to belong leads to divergent WOM with strangers and friends. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 613–632.Google Scholar
Consiglio, I., De Angelis, M., & Costabile, M. (2018). The effect of social density on word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 45, 511–528.Google Scholar
Costello, J. P., & Reczek, R. W. (2020). Providers versus platforms: Marketing communications in the sharing economy. Journal of Marketing, 84(6), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crockett, D. (2017). Paths to respectability: Consumption and stigma management in the contemporary black middle class. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 554–581.Google Scholar
Dahm, M., Wentzel, D., Herzog, W., & Wiecek, A. (2018). Breathing down your neck!: The impact of queues on customers using a retail service. Journal of Retailing, 94, 217–230.Google Scholar
Dai, H., Chan, C., & Mogilner, C. (2020). People rely less on consumer reviewers for experiential than material purchases. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(6), 1052–1075.Google Scholar
D’Angelo, J. K., Diehl, K., & Cavanaugh, L. A. (2019). Lead by example? Custom-made examples created by close others lead consumers to make dissimilar choices. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 750–773.Google Scholar
Davidson, A., & Theriault, D. A. (2021). How consumer experience is shaped by the political orientation of service providers. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(4), 792–800.Google Scholar
Delre, S. A., Broekhuizen, T. L. J., &. Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2016). The effects of shared consumption on product life cycles and advertising effectiveness: The case of the motion picture market. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(August), 608–627.Google Scholar
De Vries, E. L. E., Fennis, B. M., Bijmolt, T. H. A., Ter Horst, G. J., & Marsman, J.-B. C. (2018). Friends with benefits: Behavioral and fMRI studies on the effect of friendship reminders on self-control for compulsive and non-compulsive buyers. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35, 336–358.Google Scholar
Dimofte, C. V., Goodstein, R. C., & Brumbaugh, A. M. (2015). A social identity perspective on aspirational advertising: Implicit threats to collective self-esteem and strategies to overcome them. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(3), 416–430.Google Scholar
Donnelly, G. E., Wilson, A. V., Whillans, A. V., & Norton, M. I. (2021). Communicating resource scarcity and interpersonal connection. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(4), 726–745.Google Scholar
Dubois, D., Bonezzi, A., & De Angelis, M. (2016). Sharing with friends versus strangers: How interpersonal closeness influences word-of-mouth valence. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 712–727.Google Scholar
Duclos, R., & Barasch, A. (2014). Prosocial behavior in intergroup relations: How donor self-construal and recipient group-membership shape generosity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzhogleva, H., & Lamberton, C. P. (2014). Should birds of a feather flock together? Understanding self-control decisions in dyads. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 361–380.Google Scholar
Eisingerich, A. B., Chun, H. H., Liu, Y., Jia, H., & Bell, S. J. (2015). Why recommend a brand face-to-face but not on Facebook? How word-of-mouth on online social sites differs from traditional word-of-mouth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 120–128.Google Scholar
Esmark, C. L., & Noble, S. M. (2018). Retail space invaders: When employees’ invasion of customer space increases purchase intentions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 477–496.Google Scholar
Esmark, C. L., Noble, S. M., & Breazeale, M. J. (2017). I’ll be watching you: Shoppers’ reactions to perceptions of being watched by employees. Journal of Retailing, 93(3), 336–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etkin, J. (2016). Choosing variety for joint consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(6), 1019–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fei, X., You, Y., & Yang, X. (2020). ‘We’ are different: Exploring the diverse effects of friend and family accessibility on consumers’ product preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(3), 543–550.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. J., & Ma, Y. (2014). The price of being beautiful: Negative effects of attractiveness on empathy for children in need. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 436–450.Google Scholar
Gao, H., Winterich, K. P., & Zhang, Y. (2016). All that glitters is not gold: How others’ status influences the effect of power distance belief on status consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(2), 265–281.Google Scholar
Garbinsky, E. N., & Gladstone, J. J. (2019). The consumption consequences of couples pooling finances. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(3), 353–369.Google Scholar
Garbinsky, E. N., Gladstone, J. J., Nikolova, H., & Olson, J. G. (2019). Love, lies, and money: Financial infidelity in romantic relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 47, 1–24.Google Scholar
Gardete, P. M. (2015). Social effects in the in-flight marketplace: Characterization and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 360–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givi, J., & Galak, J. (2017). Sentimental value and gift giving: Givers’ fears of getting it wrong prevents them from getting it right. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 473–479.Google Scholar
Goode, M. G., Hart, K., & Thomson, M. (2016). Say no more! The liability of strong ties on desire for special experiences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26, 91–97.Google Scholar
Goodman, J. K., & Lim, S. (2018). When consumers prefer to give material gifts instead of experiences: The role of social distance. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), 365–382.Google Scholar
Graul, A. R. H., & Brough, A. R. (2021). Why we don’t rent what others love: The role of product attachment in consumer-to-consumer transactions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(2), 329–341.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R., Ferraro, R., Haws, K. L., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2021). Traveling with companions: The social customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 68–92.Google Scholar
Hanson, S., Jiang, L., & Dahl, D. (2019). Enhancing consumer engagement in an online brand community via user reputation signals: A multi-method analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(2), 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmeling, C. M., Palmatier, R. W., Fang, E., & Wang, D. (2017). Group marketing: Theory, mechanisms, and dynamics. Journal of Marketing, 81(4), 1–24.Google Scholar
Hasford, J., Kidwell, B., & Lopez-Kidwell, V. (2018). Happy wife, happy life: Food choices in romantic relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 1238–1256.Google Scholar
He, D., Melumad, S., & Pham, M. T. (2019). The pleasure of assessing and expressing our likes and dislikes. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 545–563.Google Scholar
He, Y., & Cunha Jr., M. (2020). Love leads to action: Short‐term mating mindset mitigates the status‐quo bias by enhancing promotion focus. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(4), 631–651.Google Scholar
Henkel, A. P., Boegershausen, J., Hoegg, J., Aquino, K., & Lemmink, J. (2018). Discounting humanity: When consumers are price conscious, employees appear less human. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(2), 272–292.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, C., & Schlager, T. (2019). Focusing on others before you shop: Exposure to Facebook promotes conventional product configurations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(2), 291–307.Google Scholar
Hingston, S. T., McManus, J. F., & Noseworthy, T. J. (2017). How inferred contagion biases dispositional judgments of others. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(2), 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, W., & Manier, D. (2008). Towards a psychology of collective memory. Memory, 16, 183–200.Google Scholar
Hock, S. J., & Bagchi, R. (2018). The impact of crowding on calorie consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 1123–1140.Google Scholar
Hofmann, W., Finkel, E. J., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2015). Close relationships and self-regulation: How relationship satisfaction facilitates momentary goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 434–452.Google Scholar
Hofstetter, R., Dahl, D. W., Aryobsei, S., & Herrmann, A. (2021). Constraining ideas: How seeing ideas of others harms creativity in open innovation. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(1), 95–114.Google Scholar
Huang, F., & Fishbach, A. (2021). Feeling lonely increases interest in previously owned products. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(5), 968–980.Google Scholar
Huang, S.-C. (2018). Social information avoidance: When, why, and how it is costly in goal pursuit. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(3), 382–395.Google Scholar
Huang, S.-C., Broniarczyk, S. M., Zhang, Y., & Beruchashvili, M. (2015). From close to distant: The dynamics of interpersonal relationships in shared goal pursuit. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 1252–1266.Google Scholar
Huang, S.-C., Etkin, J., & Jin, L. (2017). How winning changes motivation in multiphase competitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(6), 813–837.Google Scholar
Huang, S.-C., Lin, S. C., & Zhang, Y. (2019). When individual goal pursuit turns competitive: How we sabotage and coast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes, 117(3), 605–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, X., Huang, Z., & WyerJr., R. S (2018). The influence of social crowding on brand attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 1068–1084.Google Scholar
Huang, X., Zhang, M., Hui, M. K., & WyerJr., R. S. (2014) Warmth and conformity: The effects of ambient temperature on product preferences and financial decisions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 241–250.Google Scholar
Huh, Y. E., Vosgerau, J., & Morewedge, C. K. (2014). Social defaults: Observed choices become choice defaults. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 746–760.Google Scholar
Ingram, P., & Morris, M. W. (2007). Do people mix at mixers? Structure, homophily, and the ‘life of the party’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(4), 558–585.Google Scholar
Jiao, J., & Wang, J. (2018). Can lonely people behave morally? The joint influence of loneliness and empathy on moral identity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(4), 597–611.Google Scholar
Kaikati, A. M., Torelli, C. J., Winterich, K. P., & Rodas, M. A. (2017). Conforming conservatives: How salient social identities can increase donations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 422–434.Google Scholar
Kidwell, B., Lopez-Kidwell, V., Blocker, C., & Mas, E. M. (2020). Birds of a feather feel together: Emotional ability similarity in consumer interactions. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(2), 215–236.Google Scholar
Kirk, C. P., Peck, J., & Swain, S. D. (2018). Property lines in the mind: Consumers’ psychological ownership and their territorial responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 45, 148–168.Google Scholar
Kirmani, A., & Ferraro, R. (2017). Social influence and marketing. In Harkins, S., Williams, K., & Burger, J. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Social Influence (pp. 415–430). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, J. G., Lowrey, T. M., & Otnes, C. C. (2015). Identity-based motivations and anticipated reckoning: Contributions to gift-giving theory from an identity-stripping context. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(3), 431–448.Google Scholar
Krishna, A., Herd, K. B., & Aydinoğlu, N. Z. (2015). Wetting the bed at twenty-one: Embarrassment as a private emotion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(3), 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, A., Herd, K. B., & Aydinoğlu, N. Z. (2019). A review of consumer embarrassment as a public and private emotion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(3), 492–516.Google Scholar
Kristofferson, K., & White, K. (2019). Interpersonal influences in consumer psychology. In Norton, M. I., Rucker, D. D., & Lamberton, C. (Eds.). Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Psychology (pp. 419–445). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kristofferson, K., White, K., & Peloza, J. (2014). The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1149–1166.Google Scholar
Laporte, S., & Briers, B. (2019). Similarity as a double-edged sword: The positive and negative effects of showcasing similar previous winners on perceived likelihood of winning in sweepstakes. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(6), 1331–1349.Google Scholar
Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356.Google Scholar
Lee, J. (2018). Can a rude waiter make your food less tasty? Social class differences in thinking style and carryover in consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(3), 450–465.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Shrum, L. J., & Yi, Y. (2017). The role of cultural communication norms in social exclusion effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 108–116.Google Scholar
Lee, J. K., & Kronrod, A. (2020). The strength of weak-tie consensus language. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(2), 353–374.Google Scholar
Lee, S., Baumgartner, H., & Winterich, K. P. (2018). Did they earn it? Observing unearned luxury consumption decreases brand attitude when observers value fairness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(3), 412–436.Google Scholar
Lee, S. H., Rotman, J. D., & Perkins, A. W. (2014). Embodied cognition and social consumption: Self-regulating temperature through social products and behaviors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 234–240.Google Scholar
Li, X., & Zhang, M. (2014). The effects of heightened physiological needs on perception of psychological connectedness. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1078–1088.Google Scholar
Liu, P. J., & Lin, S. C. (2018). Projecting lower competence to maintain moral warmth in the avoidance of prosocial requests. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(1), 23–39.Google Scholar
Liu, P. J., McFerran, B., & Haws, K. L. (2020). Mindful matching: Ordinal versus nominal attributes. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(1), 134–155.Google Scholar
Liu, P. J., & Min, K. E. (2020). Where do you want to go for dinner? A preference expression asymmetry in joint consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1037–1054.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Polman, E., Liu, Y., & Jiao, J. (2018). Choosing for others and its relation to information search. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 147, 65–75.Google Scholar
Lowe, M. L., & Haws, K. L. (2014). (Im)moral support: The social outcomes of parallel self-control decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 489–505.Google Scholar
Lowe, M. L., Nikolova, H., Miller, C. J., & Dommer, S. L. (2019). Ceding and succeeding: How the altruistic can benefit from the selfish in joint decisions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(4), 652–661.Google Scholar
Lu, F.‐C., & Sinha, J. (2017). Speaking to the heart: Social exclusion and reliance on feelings versus reasons in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 409–421.Google Scholar
Luangrath, A., Peck, J., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Should I touch the customer? Rethinking interpersonal touch effects from the perspective of the touch initiator. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(4), 588–607.Google Scholar
LynchJr., J. G., Alba, J. W., Krishna, A., Morwitz, V. G., & Gürhan‐Canli, Z. (2012). Knowledge creation in consumer research: Multiple routes, multiple criteria. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), 473–485.Google Scholar
Ma, Z., Yang, Z., & Mourali, M. (2014). Consumer adoption of new products: Independent versus interdependent self-perspectives. Journal of Marketing, 78(2), 101–117.Google Scholar
Martin, B. A. S., & Nuttall, P. (2017). Tense from touch: Examining accidental interpersonal touch between consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 34(10), 946–955.Google Scholar
Mazodier, M., Henderson, C. M., & Beck, J. T. (2018). The long reach of sponsorship: How fan isolation and identification jointly shape sponsorship performance. Journal of Marketing, 82(6), 28–48.Google Scholar
McFerran, B., & Argo, J. J. (2014). The entourage effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 871–884.Google Scholar
Moldovan, S., Steinhart, Y., & Ofen, S. (2015). ‘Share and scare’: Solving the communication dilemma of early adopters with a high need for uniqueness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Moore, S. G. (2015). Attitude predictability and helpfulness in online reviews: The role of explained actions and reactions. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 30–44.Google Scholar
Morewedge, C. K., Zhu, M., & Buechel, E. C. (2019). Hedonic contrast effects are larger when comparisons are social. Journal of Consumer Research, 46, 286–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdock, M. R., & Rajagopal, P. (2017). The sting of social: How emphasizing social consequences in warning messages influences perceptions of risk. Journal of Marketing, 81(2), 83–98.Google Scholar
Nikiforidis, L., Durante, K. M., Redden, J. P., & Griskevicius, V. (2018). Do mothers spend more on daughters while fathers spend more on sons? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(1), 149–156.Google Scholar
Nikolova, H., & Lamberton, C. (2016). Men and the middle: Gender differences in dyadic compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 355–371.Google Scholar
O’Guinn, T. C., Tanner, R. J., & Maeng, A. (2015). Turning to space: Social density, social class, and the value of things in stores. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 196–213.Google Scholar
Olson, N. J., & Ahluwalia, R. (2021). When sharing isn’t caring: The influence of seeking the best on sharing favorable word of mouth about unsatisfactory purchases. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(6), 1025–1046.Google Scholar
Ordabayeva, N., & Fernandes, D. (2018). Better or different? How political ideology shapes preferences for differentiation in the social hierarchy. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), 227–250.Google Scholar
Otterbring, T., Ringler, C., Sirianni, N. J., & Gustafsson, A. (2018). The Abercrombie & Fitch effect: The impact of physical dominance on male consumers’ status-signaling consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 55, 69–79.Google Scholar
Packard, G., Gershoff, A. D., & Wooten, D. B. (2016). When boastful word of mouth helps versus hurts social perceptions and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(1), 26–43.Google Scholar
Paolacci, G., Straeter, L. M., & de Hooge, I. E. (2015). Give me your self: Gifts are liked more when they match the giver’s characteristics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(3), 487–494.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., Paez, D., & Rimé, B. (1997). Collective Memories of Political Events: Social Psychological Perspectives. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pozharliev, R., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., Van Strien, J. W., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2015). Merely being with you increases my attention to luxury products: Using EEG to understand consumers’ emotional experience with luxury branded products. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 546–558.Google Scholar
Pundak, C., Steinhart, Y., & Goldenberg, J. (2021). Nonmaleficence in shaming: The ethical dilemma underlying participation in online public shaming. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(3), 478–500.Google Scholar
Ratner, R. K., & Hamilton, R. W. (2015). Inhibited from bowling alone. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 266–283.Google Scholar
Reich, T., & Maglio, S. J. (2020). Featuring mistakes: The persuasive impact of purchase mistakes in online reviews. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 52–65.Google Scholar
Rim, S., Min, K. E., Liu, P. J., Chartrand, T. L., & Trope, Y. (2019). The gift of psychological closeness: How feasible versus desirable gifts reduce psychological distance to the giver. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(3), 360–371.Google Scholar
Rodas, M. A., & John, D. R. (2020). The secrecy effect: Secret consumption increases women’s product evaluations and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(6), 1093–1109.Google Scholar
Salerno, A., Laran, J., & Janiszewski, C. (2019). The bad can be good: When benign and malicious envy motivate goal pursuit. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(2), 388–405.Google Scholar
Schlosser, A. E., & Levy, E. (2016). Helping others or oneself: How direction of comparison affects prosocial behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 461–473.Google Scholar
Sezer, O., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. (2018). Humblebragging: A distinct – and ineffective – self-presentation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(1), 52–74.Google Scholar
Shteynberg, G., Hirsh, J. B., Bentley, R. A., & Garthoff, J. (2020). Shared worlds and shared minds: A theory of collective learning and a psychology of common knowledge. Psychological Review, 127(5), 918–931.Google Scholar
Simpson, B., White, K., & Laran, J. (2018). When public recognition for charitable giving backfires: The role of independent self-construal. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1257–1273.Google Scholar
Sinha, J. (2016). We are where we eat: How consumption contexts induce (un)healthful eating for stigmatized overweight consumers. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(2), 289–297.Google Scholar
Sinha, J., & Lu, F.-C. (2019). Ignored or rejected: Retail exclusion effects on construal levels and consumer responses to compensation. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 791–807.Google Scholar
Sobol, K., & Darke, P. R. (2014). ‘I’d like to be that attractive, but at least I’m smart’: How exposure to ideal advertising models motivates improved decision-making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 533–540.Google Scholar
Soderlund, M. (2016). Employee mere presence and its impact on customer satisfaction. Psychology & Marketing, 33(6), 449–464.Google Scholar
Song, X., Huang, F., & Li, X. (2017). The effect of embarrassment on preferences for brand conspicuousness: The roles of self-esteem and self-brand connection. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 69–83.Google Scholar
Steffel, M., & Le Boeuf, R. A. (2014). Overindividuation in gift giving: Shopping for multiple recipients leads givers to choose unique but less preferred gifts. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1167–1180.Google Scholar
Steffel, M., & Williams, E. F. (2018). Delegating decisions: Recruiting others to make choices we might regret. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1015–1032.Google Scholar
Steffel, M., Williams, E. F., & Perrmann-Graham, J. (2016). Passing the buck: Delegating choices to others to avoid responsibility and blame. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 135, 32–44.Google Scholar
Steinhart, Y., Kamins, M., Mazursky, D., & Noy, A. (2014). Effects of product type and contextual cues on eliciting naive theories of popularity and exclusivity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 472–483.Google Scholar
Su, L., Jiang, Y., Chen, Z., & Nathan DeWall, C. (2017). Social exclusion and consumer switching behavior: A control restoration mechanism. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 99–117.Google Scholar
Su, L., Wan, E. W., & Jiang, Y. (2019). Filling an empty self: The impact of social exclusion on consumer preference for visual density. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 808–824.Google Scholar
Sunder, S., Kim, K. H., & Yorkston, E. A. (2019). What drives herding behavior in online ratings? The role of rater experience, product portfolio, and diverging opinions. Journal of Marketing, 83(6), 93–112.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2002). What’s available – social influences and behavioral economics empirical legal realism: A new social scientific assessment of law and human behavior. Northwestern University Law Review, 97(3), 1295–1314.Google Scholar
Taylor, N., & Noseworthy, T. J. (2021). Your fries are less fattening than mine: How food sharing biases fattening judgments without biasing caloric estimates. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(4), 773–783.Google Scholar
Thomas, V. L., & Jewell, R. D. (2019). I can’t get you out of my head: The influence of secrecy on consumers’ self-brand connections. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(3), 463–471.Google Scholar
Thompson, L., & Fine, G. A. (1999). Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 278–302.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. A., Kim, M., & Smith, K. M. (2016). Community participation and consumer-to-consumer helping: Does participation in third party-hosted communities reduce one’s likelihood of helping? Journal of Marketing Research, 53(2), 280–295.Google Scholar
Tifferet, S., Saad, G., Meiri, M., & Ido, N. (2018). Gift giving at Israeli weddings as a function of genetic relatedness and kinship certainty. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(1), 157–165.Google Scholar
To, R. N., & Patrick, V. M. (2021). How the eyes connect to the heart: The influence of eye gaze direction on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(1), 123–146.Google Scholar
Torelli, C. J., Ahluwalia, R., Cheng, S. Y. Y., Olson, N. J., & Stoner, J. L. (2017). Redefining home: How cultural distinctiveness affects the malleability of in-group boundaries and brand preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 44–61.Google Scholar
Tu, Y., Shaw, A., & Fishbach, A. (2016). The friendly taking effect: How interpersonal closeness leads to seemingly selfish yet jointly maximizing choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 669–687.Google Scholar
Umashankar, N., Ward, M. K., & Dahl, D. W. (2017). The benefit of becoming friends: Complaining after service failures leads customers with strong ties to increase loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 81, 79–98.Google Scholar
Vallen, B., Sridhar, K., Rubin, D., Ilyuk, V., Block, L. G., & Argo, J. J. (2019). Shape- and trait-congruency: Using appearance-based cues as a basis for product recommendations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(2), 271–284.Google Scholar
Valsesia, F., Proserpio, D., & Nunes, J. C. (2020). The positive effect of not following others on social media. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1152–1168.Google Scholar
Von Schuckmann, J., Barros, L. S. G., Dias, R. S., & Andrade, E. B. (2018). From slum tourism to smiley selfies: The role of social identity strength in the consumption of morally ambiguous experiences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(2), 192–210.Google Scholar
Wan, E. W., Xu, J., & Ding, Y. (2014). To be or not to be unique? The effect of social exclusion on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1109–1122.Google Scholar
Wan, L. C., & Wyer Jr., R. S. (2015). Consumer reactions to attractive service providers: Approach or avoid? Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 578–595.Google Scholar
Wan, L. C., & Wyer Jr., R. S. (2019). The influence of incidental similarity on observers’ causal attributions and reactions to a service failure. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(6), 1350–1368.Google Scholar
Wang, C., Hoegg, J., & Dahl, D. (2018). The impact of a sales team’s perceived entitativity on customer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 190–211.Google Scholar
Wang, S. S., & Van Der Lans, R. (2018). Modeling gift choice: The effect of uncertainty on price sensitivity. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(4), 524–540.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Lu, S., Li, X., Khamitov, M., & Bendle, N. (2021). Audio mining: The role of vocal tone in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 48(2), 189–211.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., & John, D. R. (2019). Up, up, and away: Upgrading as a response to dissimilar brand users. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(1), 142–157.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Stoner, J. L., & John, D. R. (2019). Counterfeit luxury consumption in a social context: The effects on females’ moral disengagement and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(2), 207–225.Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Mao, H., Li, Y. J., & Liu, F. (2017). Smile big or not? Effects of smile intensity on perceptions of warmth and competence. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 787–805.Google Scholar
Ward, A. F., & Lynch Jr., J. G. (2019). On a need-to-know basis: How the distribution of responsibility between couples shapes financial literacy and financial outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 1013–1036.Google Scholar
Ward, J. C., & Reingen, P. H. (1990). Sociocognitive analysis of group decision making among consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 245–262.Google Scholar
Ward, M. K., & Broniarczyk, S. (2016) Ask and you shall (not) receive: Close friends prioritize relational signaling over recipient preferences in their gift choices. Journal of Marketing Research, 53, 1001–1018.Google Scholar
Ward, M. K., & Dahl, D. W. (2014). Should the Devil sell Prada? Retail rejection increases aspiring consumers’ desire for the brand. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 590–609.Google Scholar
Warren, C., & Mohr, G. S. (2019). Ironic consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(2), 246–266.Google Scholar
Weaver, K., & Hamby, A. (2019). The sounds of silence: Inferences from the absence of word-of-mouth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Weingarten, E., & Berger, J. (2017). Fired up for the future: How time shapes sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), 432–447.Google Scholar
White, K., Simpson, B., & Argo, J. J. (2014). The motivating role of dissociative out-groups in encouraging positive consumer behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 51, 433–447.Google Scholar
White, K., Stackhouse, M., & Argo, J. J. (2018). When social identity leads to the selection of identity-reinforcing options: The role of public self-awareness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 60–73.Google Scholar
Winterich, K. P., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Accepting inequality deters responsibility: How power distance decreases charitable behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 274–293.Google Scholar
Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688.Google Scholar
Woolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2017). A recipe for friendship: Similar food consumption promotes trust and cooperation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Wu, E. C., Moore, S. G., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2019). Wine for the table: Self-construal, group size, and choice for self and others. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 508–527.Google Scholar
Wu, Y., Hamilton, R. W., Kim, N. Y. J., & Ratner, R. K. (2021). Navigating shared consumption experiences: Clarity about a partner’s interests increases enjoyment. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(3), 439–455.Google Scholar
Xu, Q., Zhou, Y., Ye, M., & Zhou, X. (2015). Perceived social support reduces the pain of spending money. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 219–230.Google Scholar
Yeomans, M. (2019). Some hedonic consequences of perspective-taking in recommending. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 22–38.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Chintagunta, P. K., & Kalwani, M. U. (2021). Social media, influencers, and adoption of an eco-friendly product: Field experiment evidence from rural China. Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 10–27.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Li, S., Burke, R. R., & Leykin, A. (2014). An examination of social influence on shopper behavior using video tracking data. Journal of Marketing, 78, 24–41.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Feick, L., & Mittal, V. (2014). How males and females differ in their likelihood of transmitting negative word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1097–1108.Google Scholar
Zwebner, Y., & Schrift, R. Y. (2020). On my own: The aversion to being observed during the preference-construction stage. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(4), 475–499.Google Scholar

References

Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J. S., Spataro, S. E., & Chatman, J. A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1094.Google Scholar
Barker, O. (2004). Everything is so 5 minutes ago. USA Today.Google Scholar
Bellezza, S., Gino, F., & Keinan, A. (2014). The surprising benefits of nonconformity. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3), 10.Google Scholar
Bellezza, S., Paharia, N., & Keinan, A. (2017). Conspicuous consumption of time: When busyness and lack of leisure time become a status symbol. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 118–138.Google Scholar
Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–134.Google Scholar
Berger, J., & Ward, M. (2010). Subtle signals of inconspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), 555–569.Google Scholar
Berry, C. J. (1994). The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butzer, K. W. (1978). Ancient Egypt: Discovering its Splendors. National Geographic Society.Google Scholar
Cannon, C., & Rucker, D. D. (2019). The dark side of luxury: Social costs of luxury consumption. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(5), 767–779.Google Scholar
Charles, K. K., Hurst, E., & Roussanov, N. (2009). Conspicuous consumption and race. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 425–467.Google Scholar
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.Google Scholar
Desmichel, P., & Rucker, D. D. (2022). Social-rank cues: Decoding rank from physical characteristics, behaviors, and possessions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 79–84.Google Scholar
Dion, D., & Borraz, S. (2017). Managing status: How luxury brands shape class subjectivities in the service encounter. Journal of Marketing, 81(5), 67–85.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. (1893/2014). The Division of Labor in Society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Free Press.Google Scholar
Garcia, S. M., Weaver, K., & Chen, P. (2019). The status signals paradox. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(5), 690–696.Google Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392.Google Scholar
Han, Y. J., Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 15–30.Google Scholar
Hanser, A. (2007). Is the customer always right? Class, service and the production of distinction in Chinese department stores. Theory and Society, 36(5), 415–435.Google Scholar
Hudders, L., Pandelaere, M., & Vyncke, P. (2013). Consumer meaning making: The meaning of luxury brands in a democratised luxury world. International Journal of Market Research, 55(3), 391–412.Google Scholar
Ivanic, A. S., Overbeck, J. R., & Nunes, J. C. (2011). Status, race, and money: The impact of racial hierarchy on willingness to pay. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1557–1566.Google Scholar
Kapferer, J.-N., & Bastien, V. (2009). The specificity of luxury management: Turning marketing upside down. Journal of Brand Management, 16(5), 311–322.Google Scholar
Kim, S., & Gal, D. (2014). From compensatory consumption to adaptive consumption: The role of self-acceptance in resolving self-deficits. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 526–542.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Ko, E., & Megehee, C. M. (2015). Social benefits of brand logos in presentation of self in cross and same gender influence contexts. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1341–1349.Google Scholar
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398.Google Scholar
Maner, J. K. (2017). Dominance and prestige: A tale of two hierarchies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 526–531.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1844/1964). Karl Marx: Early Writings (T. B. Bottomore, Trans.). McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mazzocco, P. J., Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Anderson, E. T. (2012). Direct and vicarious conspicuous consumption: Identification with low-status groups increases the desire for high-status goods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), 520–528.Google Scholar
Mittnik, A., Massy, K., Knipper, C., et al. (2019). Kinship-based social inequality in Bronze Age Europe. Science, 366(6466), 731–734.Google Scholar
Nelissen, R. M., & Meijers, M. H. (2011). Social benefits of luxury brands as costly signals of wealth and status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(5), 343–355.Google Scholar
Nolan, Christopher (2020). Tenet. London, Faber & Faber. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Merry-Go-Round-Christopher-Nolan/dp/0571362737.Google Scholar
Plourde, A. M. (2008). The origins of prestige goods as honest signals of skill and knowledge. Human Nature, 19(4), 374–388.Google Scholar
Plourde, A. M. (2010). Human power and prestige systems. In Kappeler, P. M., & Silk, J. (Eds.). Mind the Gap (pp. 139–152). Springer.Google Scholar
Rivera, L. A. (2010). Status distinctions in interaction: Social selection and exclusion at an elite nightclub. Qualitative Sociology, 33(3), 229–255.Google Scholar
Romaniuk, J., & Huang, A. (2020). Understanding consumer perceptions of luxury brands. International Journal of Market Research, 62(5), 546–560.Google Scholar
Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 257–267.Google Scholar
Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 549–555.Google Scholar
Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Magee, J. C. (2018). The agentic–communal model of advantage and disadvantage: How inequality produces similarities in the psychology of power, social class, gender, and race. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 71–125.Google Scholar
Rucker, D. D., Hu, M., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). The experience versus the expectations of power: A recipe for altering the effects of power on behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 381–396.Google Scholar
Rustagi, N., & Shrum, L. (2019). Undermining the restorative potential of compensatory consumption: A product’s explicit identity connection impedes self-repair. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(1), 119–139.Google Scholar
Smith, E. A., & Bird, R. B. (2005). Costly signaling and cooperative behavior. In Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (Eds.).Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life (pp. 115–148). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 664.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. (1899/1981). The Theory of the Leisure Class. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Walasek, L., Bhatia, S., & Brown, G. D. (2018). Positional goods and the social rank hypothesis: Income inequality affects online chatter about high‐ and low‐status brands on Twitter. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(1), 138–148.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., & Griskevicius, V. (2014). Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: Women’s luxury products as signals to other women. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 834–854.Google Scholar
Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1982). Symbolic Self-Completion. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

References

Albrecht, D. (2022). Vaccination, politics, and COVID-19 impacts. BMC Public Health, 22(96), 2469.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., & Angeletos, G. M. (2005). Fairness and redistribution. American Economic Review, 95(4), 960–980.Google Scholar
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right Wing Authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, R. A. (1996). The Authoritarian Specter. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Angle, J. W., Dagogo‐Jack, S. W., Forehand, M. R., & Perkins, A. W. (2017). Activating stereotypes with brand imagery: The role of viewer political identity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 84–90.Google Scholar
Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614.Google Scholar
Ashokkumar, A., Talaifar, S., Fraser, W. T., et al. (2020). Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 91, 104031.Google Scholar
Beattie, P., Chen, R., & Bettache, K. (2022). When left is right and right is left: The psychological correlates of political ideology in China. Political Psychology, 43(3), 457–488.Google Scholar
Berman, R., Melumad, S., Humphrey, C., & Meyer, R. (2019). A tale of two Twitterspheres: Political microblogging during and after the 2016 primary and presidential debates. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(6), 895–917.Google Scholar
Bhagwat, Y., Warren, N. L., Beck, J. T., & Watson IV, G. F. (2020). Corporate sociopolitical activism and firm value. Journal of Marketing, 84(5), 1–21.Google Scholar
Bruell, A. (2019). Political ad spending will approach $10 billion in 2020, new forecast predicts. Wall Street Journal, www.wsj.com/articles/political-ad-spending-will-approach-10-billion-in-2020-new-forecast-predicts-11559642400Google Scholar
Cakanlar, A., Trudel, R., & White, K. (2022). Political ideology and the perceived impact of coronavirus prevention behaviors for the self and others. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 7(1), 36–44.Google Scholar
Campbell, T. H., & Kay, A. C. (2014). Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 809–824.Google Scholar
Cardiff, C. F., & Klein, D. B. (2005). Faculty partisan affiliations in all disciplines: A voter‐registration study. Critical Review, 17(3–4), 237–255.Google Scholar
Chan, E. Y. (2020). Political conservatism and anthropomorphism: An investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(3), 515–524.Google Scholar
Chan, E. Y., & Ilicic, J. (2019). Political ideology and brand attachment. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(4), 630–646.Google Scholar
Chin, M. K., Hambrick, D. C., & Treviño, L. K. (2013). Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 197–232.Google Scholar
Clarkson, J. J., Chambers, J. R., Hirt, E. R., Otto, A. S., Kardes, F. R., & Leone, C. (2015). The self-control consequences of political ideology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(27), 8250–8253.Google Scholar
CMO Survey (2020, February). Highlights and Insights Report. The CMO Survey, https://cmosurvey.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/The_CMO_Survey-Highlights-and_Insights_Report-Feb-2020.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cohen, F., Ogilvie, D. M., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2005). American roulette: The effect of reminders of death on support for George W. Bush in the 2004 presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 177–187.Google Scholar
Coskuner-Balli, G. (2020). Citizen-consumers wanted: Revitalizing the American dream in the face of economic recessions, 1981–2012. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(3), 327–349.Google Scholar
Crimston, C. R., Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., & Bastian, B. (2016). Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 636–663.Google Scholar
Davidson, A., & Theriault, D. A. (2021). How consumer experience is shaped by the political orientation of service providers. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(4), 792–800.Google Scholar
Desmichel, P., Ordabayeva, N., & Kocher, B. (2020). What if diamonds did not last forever? Signaling status achievement through ephemeral versus iconic luxury goods. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 158, 49–65.Google Scholar
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., et al. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 273–291.Google Scholar
Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. (2015). Political diversity will improve social and personality psychological science, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, 1–13.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. (2014, November 10). Is Social Psychology Biased Against Conservatives? Psychology Today, www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sound-science-sound-policy/201411/is-social-psychology-biased-against-conservativesGoogle Scholar
Eilert, M., & Nappier Cherup, A. (2020). The activist company: Examining a company’s pursuit of societal change through corporate activism using an institutional theoretical lens. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4), 461–476.Google Scholar
Eitan, O., Viganola, D., Inbar, Y., et al. (2018). Is research in social psychology politically biased? Systematic empirical tests and a forecasting survey to address the controversy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 188–199.Google Scholar
El Nayal, O., van Oosterhout, J., & van Essen, M. (2021). Ties that bind and grind? Investor reactions to politician appointments to corporate boards. Journal of Management, 47(2), 456–487.Google Scholar
Everett, J. A. (2013). The 12 item social and economic conservatism scale (SECS). PLoS ONE, 8(12), e82131–e82131.Google Scholar
Farmer, A., Kidwell, B., & Hardesty, D. M. (2020). Helping a few a lot or many a little: Political ideology and charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(4), 614–630.Google Scholar
Farmer, A., Kidwell, B., & Hardesty, D. M. (2021). The politics of choice: Political ideology and intolerance of ambiguity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 6–21.Google Scholar
Feinberg, M., Tullett, A. M., Mensch, Z., Hart, W., & Gottlieb, S. (2017). The political reference point: How geography shapes political identity. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0171497–e0171497.Google Scholar
Fernandes, D. (2020). Politics at the mall: The moral foundations of boycotts. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4), 494–513.Google Scholar
Fernandes, D., & Mandel, N. (2014). Political conservatism and variety‐seeking. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), 79–86.Google Scholar
Fernandes, D., Ordabayeva, N., Han, K., Jung, J., & Mittal, V. (2022). How political identity shapes customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 86(6), 116–134.Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Bail, C. A., Cikara, M., et al. (2020). Political sectarianism in America. Science, 370(6516), 533–536.Google Scholar
Fossen, B. L., Mallapragada, G., & De, A. (2021). Impact of political television advertisements on viewers’ response to subsequent advertisements. Marketing Science, 40(2), 305–324.Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., Griffin, B. N., Belsky, J., & Roisman, G. I. (2012). Developmental antecedents of political ideology: A longitudinal investigation from birth to age 18 years. Psychological Science, 23(11), 1425–1431.Google Scholar
Gallup. (2012, January 12). Conservatives remain the largest ideological group in U.S. www.gallup.com/poll/152021/conservatives-remain-largest-ideological-group.aspx.Google Scholar
Geiger, N., Pasek, M. H., Gruszczynski, M., Ratcliff, N. J., & Weaver, K. S. (2020). Political ingroup conformity and pro-environmental behavior: Evaluating the evidence from a survey and mousetracking experiments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101524.Google Scholar
Goenka, S., & van Osselaer, S. M. (2021). Why is it wrong to sell your body? Understanding liberals’ versus conservatives’ moral objections to bodily markets. Journal of Marketing, 00222429211046936.Google Scholar
Gordon, B. R., & Hartmann, W. R. (2013). Advertising effects in presidential elections. Marketing Science, 32(1), 19–35.Google Scholar
Gordon, B. R., Lovett, M. J., Shachar, R., et al. (2012). Marketing and politics: Models, behavior, and policy implications. Marketing Letters, 23(2), 391–403.Google Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.Google Scholar
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385.Google Scholar
Gromet, D. M., Kunreuther, H., & Larrick, R. P. (2013). Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(23), 9314–9319.Google Scholar
Hadani, M., Bonardi, J. P., & Dahan, N. M. (2017). Corporate political activity, public policy uncertainty, and firm outcomes: A meta-analysis. Strategic Organization, 15(3), 338–366.Google Scholar
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116.Google Scholar
Han, K., Jung, J., Mittal, V., Zyung, J. D., & Adam, H. (2019). Political identity and financial risk taking: Insights from social dominance orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(4), 581–601.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2/3), 61–83.Google Scholar
Hersel, M. C., Helmuth, C. A., Zorn, M. L., Shropshire, C., & Ridge, J. W. (2019). The corrective actions organizations pursue following misconduct: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 547–585.Google Scholar
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–256.Google Scholar
Huber, M., Van Boven, L., Park, B., & Pizzi, W. T. (2015). Seeing red: Anger increases how much Republican identification predicts partisan attitudes and perceived polarization. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0139193.Google Scholar
Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Hydock, C., Paharia, N., & Blair, S. (2020). Should your brand pick a side? How market share determines the impact of corporate political advocacy. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1135–1151.Google Scholar
Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 496–503.Google Scholar
Irmak, C., Murdock, M. R., & Kanuri, V. K. (2020). When consumption regulations backfire: The role of political ideology. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(5), 966–984.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2009). “Elective affinities”: On the psychological bases of left–right differences. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2–3), 129–141.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2017). The marketplace of ideology: “Elective affinities” in political psychology and their implications for consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 502–520.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Fitzsimons, G., & Kay, A. C. (2004). The ideological animal: A system justification view. In Greenberg, J., Koole, S. L., & Pyszczynksi, T. (Eds.). Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology (pp. 263–283). Guilford.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Langer, M., & Singh, V. (2017). The politics of buying, boycotting, complaining, and disputing: An extension of the research program by Jung, Garbarino, Briley, and Wynhausen. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 503–510.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 989–1007.Google Scholar
Jung, K., Garbarino, E., Briley, D. A., & Wynhausen, J. (2017). Blue and red voices: Effects of political ideology on consumers’ complaining and disputing behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 477–499.Google Scholar
Jung, J., & Mittal, V. (2021). Political identity and preference for supplemental educational programs. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(3), 559–578.Google Scholar
Kaikati, A. M., Torelli, C. J., Winterich, K. P., & Rodas, M. A. (2017). Conforming conservatives: How salient social identities can increase donations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 422–434.Google Scholar
Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823–837.Google Scholar
Keating, J., Van Boven, L., & Judd, C. M. (2017). Partisan underestimation of the polarizing influence of group discussion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 52–58.Google Scholar
Kettle, K. L., & Salerno, A. (2017). Anger promotes economic conservatism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(10), 1440–1454.Google Scholar
Khan, R., Misra, K., & Singh, V. (2013). Ideology and brand consumption. Psychological Science, 24(3), 326–333.Google Scholar
Kidwell, B., Farmer, A., & Hardesty, D. M. (2013). Getting liberals and conservatives to go green: Political ideology and congruent appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 350–367.Google Scholar
Kim, J. C., Park, B., & Dubois, D. (2018). How consumers’ political ideology and status-maintenance goals interact to shape their desire for luxury goods. Journal of Marketing, 82(6), 132–149.Google Scholar
Kim, K. R., Kang, J. S., & Yun, S. (2012). Moral intuitions and political orientation: Similarities and differences between South Korea and the United States. Psychological Reports, 111(1), 173–185.Google Scholar
Kirzinger, A., Kearney, A., Hamel, L., & Brodie, M. (2021). KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor: The increasing importance of partisanship in predicting COVID-19 vaccination status. Kaiser Family Foundation, www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/poll-finding/importance-of-partisanship-predicting-vaccination-status/Google Scholar
Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 92–109.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 691–704.Google Scholar
Krishna, A., & Sokolova, T. (2017). A focus on partisanship: How it impacts voting behaviors and political attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 537–545.Google Scholar
Kubin, E., Puryear, C., Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2021). Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(6). e2008389118Google Scholar
Kübler, R. V., Langmaack, M., Albers, S., & Hoyer, W. D. (2020). The impact of value-related crises on price and product-performance elasticities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(4), 776–794.Google Scholar
Kwon, M., & Barone, M. J. (2020). A world of mistrust: Fake news, mistrust mind-sets, and product evaluations. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 5(2), 206–219.Google Scholar
Lamberton, C., De Neve, J. E., & Norton, M. I. (2018). The power of voice in stimulating morality: Eliciting taxpayer preferences increases tax compliance. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(2), 310–328.Google Scholar
Landsman, V., & Stremersch, S. (2020). The commercial consequences of collective layoffs: Close the plant, lose the brand? Journal of Marketing, 84(3), 122–141.Google Scholar
Lee, Y., Yoon, S., Lee, Y. W., & Royne, M. B. (2018). How liberals and conservatives respond to equality-based and proportionality-based rewards in charity advertising. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37(1), 108–118.Google Scholar
Luedicke, M. K., Thompson, C. J., & Giesler, M. (2010). Consumer identity work as moral protagonism: How myth and ideology animate a brand-mediated moral conflict. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 1016–1032.Google Scholar
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., Panayiotou, O., Castellanos, K., & Batayneh, J. (2018). Populism as identity politics: Perceived in-group disadvantage, collective narcissism, and support for populism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 151–162.Google Scholar
Martin, J. L. (2001). The authoritarian personality, 50 years later: What questions are there for political psychology? Political Psychology, 22(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Martin, K. D., Josephson, B. W., Vadakkepatt, G. G., & Johnson, J. L. (2018). Political management, research and development, and advertising capital in the pharmaceutical industry: A good prognosis? Journal of Marketing, 82(3), 87–107.Google Scholar
McClintock, C. G., Spaulding, C. B., & Turner, H. A. (1965). Political orientations of academically affiliated psychologists. American Psychologist, 20(3), 211–221.Google Scholar
McDonnell, M. H., & Cobb, J. A. (2020). Take a stand or keep your seat: Board turnover after social movement boycotts. Academy of Management Journal, 63(4), 1028–1053.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, A. (1996). Relations among political attitudes, personality, and psychopathology assessed with new measures of libertarianism and conservatism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18(4), 469–491.Google Scholar
Mittal, V., Malshe, A., & Sridhar, S. (2018, March). The unequal effect of partisanship on brands. Harvard Business Review, https://hbr. org/2018/03/the-unequal-effects-of partisanship-on-brandsGoogle Scholar
Mohan, B., Schlager, T., Deshpandé, R., & Norton, M. I. (2018). Consumers avoid buying from firms with higher CEO‐to‐worker pay ratios. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(2), 344–352.Google Scholar
Nail, P. R., McGregor, I., Drinkwater, A. E., Steele, G. M., & Thompson, A. W. (2009). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 901–907.Google Scholar
Neilson, W. A. (Ed.). (1958). Webster’s New International Dictionary of the English Language (2nd ed., unabridged). Merriam.Google Scholar
Ordabayeva, N. (2019). Similar but unequal: Political polarization in the effects of perceived social similarity on support for redistribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, 103811.Google Scholar
Ordabayeva, N., & Fernandes, D. (2017). Similarity focus and support for redistribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 67–74.Google Scholar
Ordabayeva, N., & Fernandes, D. (2018). Better or different? How political ideology shapes preferences for differentiation in the social hierarchy. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), 227–250.Google Scholar
Paharia, N. (2020). Who receives credit or blame? The effects of made-to-order production on responses to unethical and ethical company production practices. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 88–104.Google Scholar
Paharia, N., & Swaminathan, V. (2019). Who is wary of user design? The role of power-distance beliefs in preference for user-designed products. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 91–107.Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, C., Green, D. P., Krasno, J., Schwam-Baird, M., & Endres, K. (2020). Partisan consumerism: Experimental tests of consumer reactions to corporate political activity. The Journal of Politics, 82(3), 996–1007.Google Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin UK.Google Scholar
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50.Google Scholar
Pereira, B., & Stornelli, J. (2022). Collective health versus individual freedom: Goal centrality and political identity shape COVID-19 prevention behaviors. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 7(1), 17–26.Google Scholar
Peterson, M., & Godby, R. W. (2020). Citizen participation in political markets: Extending service-dominant logic to public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4), 412–429.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2017, October 20). Political Polarization, 1994–2017. www.people-press.org/interactives/political-polarization-1994-2017/Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2019), In a Politically Polarized Era, Sharp Divides in Both Partisan Coalitions. www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/12/17/in-a-politically-polarized-era-sharp-divides-in-both-partisan-coalitions/Google Scholar
Pham, M. T. (2013), The seven sins of consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 411–23.Google Scholar
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlager, T., Mohan, B., DeCelles, K., & Norton, M. (2021). Consumers—especially women—avoid buying from firms with higher gender pay gaps. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(3), 518–531.Google Scholar
Schmitt, B., Brakus, J. J., & Biraglia, A. (2022). Consumption ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(1), 74–95.Google Scholar
Schoenmueller, V., Netzer, O., & Stahl, F. (2021). Polarized America: From political partisanship to preference partisanship. Columbia Business School Working Paper.Google Scholar
Seiders, K., Flynn, A. G., & Nenkov, G. Y. (2022). How industries use direct-to-public persuasion in policy conflicts: Asymmetries in public voting responses. Journal of Marketing, 86(2), 126–146.Google Scholar
Shavitt, S. (2017). Political ideology drives consumer psychology: Introduction to research dialogue. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 500–501.Google Scholar
Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Shepherd, S., & Kay, A. C. (2018). Guns as a source of order and chaos: Compensatory control and the psychological (dis) utility of guns for liberals and conservatives. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 3(1), 16–26.Google Scholar
Silver, I., & Shaw, A. (2020). Political neutrality aversion: When and why ‘staying out of it’ backfires. In Argo, J., Lowrey, T. M., & Schau, H. J. (Eds.). NA – Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 48 (pp. 1086–1090). Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
Sprout Social. (2018). #BrandsGetReal: Championing change in the age of social media. https://sproutsocial.com/insights/data/championing-change-in-the-age-of-social-media/Google Scholar
Statista. (2020, November). U.S. political ad spending during election cycles 2014–2020, by medium. www.statista.com/statistics/1182087/political-advertising-spending-election-cycle-by-medium-united-states/Google Scholar
Tedin, K. L. (1987). Political ideology and the vote. Research in Micropolitics, 2(1), 63–94.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., Hannum, K. A., & Micheletti, P. M. (1984). Stability and change in the complexity of senatorial debate: Testing the cognitive versus rhetorical style hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 979–990.Google Scholar
Trading Economics. (2021, September 25), United States Home Ownership Rate. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/home-ownership-rateGoogle Scholar
Ulver, S., & Laurell, C. (2020). Political ideology in consumer resistance: Analyzing far-right opposition to multicultural marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4), 477–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadakkepatt, G. G., Arora, S., Martin, K. D., & Paharia, N. (2021). Shedding light on the dark side of firm lobbying: A customer perspective. Journal of Marketing, 2224292110230.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018). The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 213–224.Google Scholar
Van Boven, L., Ehret, P. J., & Sherman, D. K. (2018). Psychological barriers to bipartisan public support for climate policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 492–507.Google Scholar
van Esch, P., Cui, Y. G., & Jain, S. P. (2021). The effect of political ideology and message frame on donation intent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Research, 125, 201–213.Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Lee, A., & Polonsky, M. (2018). Egregiousness and boycott intensity: Evidence from the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Management Science, 64(1), 149–163.Google Scholar
Waytz, A., Iyer, R., Young, L., Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2019). Ideological differences in the expanse of the moral circle. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Westfall, J., Van Boven, L., Chambers, J. R., & Judd, C. M. (2015). Perceiving political polarization in the United States: Party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 145–158.Google Scholar
Winterich, K. P., Zhang, Y., & Mittal, V. (2012). How political identity and charity positioning increase donations: Insights from moral foundations theory. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 346–354.Google Scholar

References

Ahuvia, A. C. (2005). Beyond the extended self: Loved objects and consumers’ identity narratives. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 17–84.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443.Google Scholar
Appau, S., Ozanne, J. L., & Klein, J. G. (2020). Understanding difficult consumer transitions: The in/dividual consumer in permanent liminality. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(2), 167–191.Google Scholar
Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(6), 713–730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, J. M., & Sood, J. (1993). The effects of religious affiliation on consumer behavior: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 5(3), 328–352.Google Scholar
Beck, J. T., Rahinel, R., & Bleier, A. (2020). Company worth keeping: Personal control and preferences for brand leaders. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(5), 871–886.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (1992). Moving possessions: An analysis based on personal documents from the 1847–1869 Mormon migration. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 339–361.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W., SherryJr., J. F., & Wallendorf, M. (1988). A naturalistic inquiry into buyer and seller behavior at a swap meet. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 449–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belk, R., & Tumbat, G. (2005). The cult of Macintosh. Consumption Markets & Culture, 8(3), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M., & SherryJr., J. F. (1989). The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: Theodicy on the odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 1–38.Google Scholar
Benjamin, D. J., Choi, J. J., & Fisher, G. (2016). Religious identity and economic behavior. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(4), 617–637.Google Scholar
Benson, P., & Spilka, B. (1973). God image as a function of self-esteem and locus of control. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 12(3), 297–310.Google Scholar
Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: A conflicting values perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 348–370.Google Scholar
Casidy, R., Duhachek, A., Singh, V., & Tamaddoni, A. (2021). Religious belief, religious priming, and negative word-of-mouth in everyday service failure encounters. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(4), 762–781.Google Scholar
Cheng, Y., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Schrift, R. Y. (2017). Do costly options lead to better outcomes? How the Protestant Work Ethic influences the cost–benefit heuristic in goal pursuit. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(4), 636–649.Google Scholar
Coleman, T. J. III, HoodJr., R. W., & Streib, H. (2018). An introduction to atheism, agnosticism, and nonreligious worldviews. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(3), 203–206.Google Scholar
Cutright, K. M. (2012). The beauty of boundaries: When and why we seek structure in consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 775–790.Google Scholar
Cutright, K. M., Erdem, T., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Shachar, R. (2014). Finding brands and losing your religion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2209–2222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolbec, P. Y., Castilhos, R., Fonseca, M. J., & Trez, G. (2022). How established organizations combine logics to reconfigure resources and adapt to marketization: A case study on Brazilian religious schools. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(1), 118–135.Google Scholar
Doran, C. J., & Natale, S. M. (2011). ἐμπάθεια (Empatheia) and caritas: The role of religion in fair trade consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Essoo, N., & Dibb, S. (2004). Religious influences on shopping behaviour: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(7–8), 683–712.Google Scholar
Gallup. (2017). Historical trends. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1690/religion.aspxGoogle Scholar
Garssen, B., Visser, A., & Pool, G. (2021). Does spirituality or religion positively affect mental health? Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 31(1), 4–20.Google Scholar
Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about God increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 298–302.Google Scholar
Grewal, L., Wu, E. C., & Cutright, K. M. (2022). Loved as-is: How God salience lowers interest in self-improvement products. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(1), 154–174.Google Scholar
Hackney, C. H., & Sanders, G. S. (2003). Religiosity and mental health: A meta–analysis of recent studies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(1), 43–55.Google Scholar
Hirschman, E. C., Ruvio, A. A., & Touzani, M. (2011). Breaking bread with Abraham’s children: Christians, Jews and Muslims’ holiday consumption in dominant, minority and diasporic communities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(3), 429–448.Google Scholar
HoodJr., R. W., Hill, P. C., & Spilka, B. (2018). The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach. Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Hyodo, J. D., & Bolton, L. E. (2021). How does religion affect consumer response to failure and recovery by firms? Journal of Consumer Research, 47(5), 807–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izberk-Bilgin, E. (2012). Infidel brands: Unveiling alternative meanings of global brands at the nexus of globalization, consumer culture, and Islamism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 663–687.Google Scholar
James, W. (1902/2002). The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma. Free Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. A., Minton, E. A., & McClernon, M. P. (2021). Recycling, relatedness, and reincarnation: Religious beliefs about nature and the afterlife as predictors of sustainability practices. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/rel0000407Google Scholar
Kalliny, M., Minton, E. A., & Benmamoun, M. (2018). Affect as a driver to religious‐based consumer boycotts: Evidence from qualitative and quantitative research in the United States. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(6), 840–853.Google Scholar
Karataş, M., & Gürhan-Canli, Z. (2020). A construal level account of the impact of religion and God on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(7), 1107–1120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 18.Google Scholar
Keysar, A., & Navarro-Rivera, J. (2017). 36. A world of atheism: Global demographics. In Bullivant, S., & Ruse, M. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Atheism (pp. 553–587). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V. (2001). Utopian enterprise: Articulating the meanings of Star Trek’s culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 67–88.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 691–704.Google Scholar
Kupor, D. M., Laurin, K., & Levav, J. (2015). Anticipating divine protection? Reminders of God can increase nonmoral risk taking. Psychological Science, 26(4), 374–384.Google Scholar
Kurt, D., Inman, J. J., & Gino, F. (2018). Religious shoppers spend less money. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 116–124.Google Scholar
La Barbera, P. A., & Gürhan, Z. (1997). The role of materialism, religiosity, and demographics in subjective well‐being. Psychology & Marketing, 14(1), 71–97.Google Scholar
Lastovicka, J. L., Bettencourt, L. A., Hughner, R. S., & Kuntze, R. J. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: Theory and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 85–98.Google Scholar
Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2012). Divergent effects of activating thoughts of God on self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 4–21.Google Scholar
Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review, 37, 112–118.Google Scholar
Mathras, D., Cohen, A. B., Mandel, N., & Mick, D. G. (2016). The effects of religion on consumer behavior: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(2), 298–311.Google Scholar
McAlexander, J. H., Dufault, B. L., Martin, D. M., & Schouten, J. W. (2014). The marketization of religion: Field, capital, and consumer identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 858–875.Google Scholar
McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310–321.Google Scholar
McGraw, P. A., Schwartz, J. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (2012). From the commercial to the communal: Reframing taboo trade-offs in religious and pharmaceutical marketing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 157–173.Google Scholar
McGregor, I., Nash, K., & Prentice, M. (2010). Reactive approach motivation (RAM) for religion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 148–161.Google Scholar
Mehta, R., & Belk, R. W. (1991). Artifacts, identity, and transition: Favorite possessions of Indians and Indian immigrants to the United States. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 398–411.Google Scholar
Miller, A. J., & WorthingtonJr., E. L. (2013). Connection between personality and religion and spirituality. In Aten, J., O’Grady, K., & Worthington, Jr., E. (Eds.). The Psychology of Religion and Spirituality for Clinicians (pp. 115–144). Routledge.Google Scholar
Minton, E. A., Johnson, K. A., Vizcaino, M., & Wharton, C. (2020). Is it godly to waste food? How understanding consumers’ religion can help reduce consumer food waste. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 54(4), 1246–1269.Google Scholar
Minton, E. A., & Kahle, L. R. (2013). Religion and consumer behaviour. In Jansson-Boyd, C. V., & Zawisza, M. J. (Eds.). Routledge International Handbook of Consumer Psychology (pp. 310–329). Routledge.Google Scholar
Minton, E. A., Kahle, L. R., & Kim, C. H. (2015). Religion and motives for sustainable behaviors: A cross-cultural comparison and contrast. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 1937–1944.Google Scholar
Minton, E. A., Xie, H. J., Gurel‐Atay, E., & Kahle, L. R. (2018). Greening up because of god: The relations among religion, sustainable consumption and subjective well‐being. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(6), 655–663.Google Scholar
Moisio, R., & Beruchashvili, M. (2010). Questing for well-being at Weight Watchers: The role of the spiritual-therapeutic model in a support group. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 857–875.Google Scholar
MunizJr., A. M., & Schau, H. J. (2005). Religiosity in the abandoned Apple Newton brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 737–747.Google Scholar
Netzer, O., Lemaire, A., & Herzenstein, M. (2019). When words sweat: Identifying signals for loan default in the text of loan applications. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(6), 960–980.Google Scholar
Newton, J. D., Wong, J., & Casidy, R. (2018). Deck the halls with boughs of holly to soften evaluations of service failure. Journal of Service Research, 21(4), 389–404.Google Scholar
O’Guinn, T. C., & Belk, R. W. (1989). Heaven on earth: Consumption at Heritage Village, USA. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 227–238.Google Scholar
Park, C. L. (2005). Religion as a meaning‐making framework in coping with life stress. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 707–729.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., & Stone, L. D. (2004). Translating traumatic experiences into language: Implications for child abuse and long-term health. In Koenig, L. J., Doll, L. S., O’Leary, A., & Pequegnat, W. (Eds.). From Child Sexual Abuse to Adult Sexual Risk: Trauma, Revictimization, and Intervention (pp. 201–216). American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2015, November 3). U.S. public becoming less religious. www.pewforum.org/2015/11/03/u-s-public-becoming-less-religious/Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2017, April 5). The changing global religious landscape. www.pewforum.org/2017/04/05/the-changing-global-religious-landscape/Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2021, January 14). Measuring religion in Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel. www.pewforum.org/2021/01/14/measuring-religion-in-pew-research-centers-american-trends-panel/Google Scholar
Powell, L. H., Shahabi, L., & Thoresen, C. E. (2003). Religion and spirituality: Linkages to physical health. American Psychologist, 58(1), 36–52.Google Scholar
Preston, J. L., & Baimel, A. (2021). Towards a psychology of religion and the environment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 145–149.Google Scholar
Preston, J. L., & Ritter, R. S. (2013). Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1471–1483.Google Scholar
Rindfleisch, A., Wong, N., & Burroughs, J. E. (2010). God & Mammon: The influence of religiosity on brand connections. In Wuyts, S. H. K., Dekimpe, M. G., Gijsbrechts, E., & Pieters, F. G. M. (Eds.). The Connected Customer: The Changing Nature of Consumer and Business Markets (pp. 163–202). Routledge.Google Scholar
Rowatt, W., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2002). Two dimensions of attachment to God and their relation to affect, religiosity, and personality constructs. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(4), 637–651.Google Scholar
Rutchick, A. M. (2010). Deus ex machina: The influence of polling place on voting behavior. Political Psychology, 31(2), 209–225.Google Scholar
Rye, M. S., Pargament, K. I., Ali, M. A., et al. (2000). Religious perspectives on forgiveness. In McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (Eds.). Forgiveness: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 17–40). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sandikci, Ö., & Ger, G. (2010). Veiling in style: How does a stigmatized practice become fashionable? Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 15–36.Google Scholar
Sandstrom, A. (2017, August 17). God or the divine is referenced in every state constitution. Pew Research Center, www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/08/17/god-or-the-divine-is-referenced-in-every-state-constitution/Google Scholar
Saroglou, V., & Muñoz‐García, A. (2008). Individual differences in religion and spirituality: An issue of personality traits and/or values. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47(1), 83–101.Google Scholar
Saroglou, V., Corneille, O., & Van Cappellen, P. (2009). “Speak, Lord, your servant is listening”: Religious priming activates submissive thoughts and behaviors. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19(3), 143–154.Google Scholar
Schnabel, L., & Schieman, S. (2022). Religion protected mental health but constrained crisis response during crucial early days of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 61(2), 530–543.Google Scholar
Schonfeld, B., & Winter-Levy, S. (2020, August 27). The pandemic is making people more religious. The Boston Globe, www.bostonglobe.com/2020/08/27/opinion/pandemic-is-making-people-more-religious/Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the structure and content of values. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., & Huismans, S. (1995). Value priorities and religiosity in four Western religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 15(2), 88–107.Google Scholar
Shachar, R., Erdem, T., Cutright, K. M., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2011). Brands: The opiate of the nonreligious masses? Marketing Science, 30(1), 92–110.Google Scholar
Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803–809.Google Scholar
Shariff, A. F., Willard, A. K., Andersen, T., & Norenzayan, A. (2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(1), 27–48.Google Scholar
Shepherd, S., & Kay, A. C. (2019). ‘Jesus, take the wheel’: The appeal of spiritual products in satiating concerns about randomness. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(5–6), 467–490.Google Scholar
Sherry, J. F., & Kozinets, R. V. (2007). Comedy of the commons: Nomadic spirituality and the Burning Man festival. In Belk, R. W., & Sherry, J. F. (Eds.). Consumer Culture Theory (pp. 119–147). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Smith, H. (1991). The World’s Religions: Our Great Wisdom Traditions. Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Soenke, M., Landau, M. J., & Greenberg, J. (2013). Sacred armor: Religion’s role as a buffer against the anxieties of life and the fear of death. In Pargament, K. I., Exline, J. J., & Jones, J. W. (Eds.). APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, Theory, and Research (pp. 105–122). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1660–1672.Google Scholar
Starr, M. (2012). God of Love: A Guide to the Heart of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Monkfish Book Publishing.Google Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., Poehlman, T. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Bargh, J. A. (2011). Implicit Puritanism in American moral cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 312–320.Google Scholar
Van Elk, M., Matzke, D., Gronau, Q., Guang, M., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2015). Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: A skeptical perspective on religious priming. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1365.Google Scholar
Vitell, S. J., Singh, J. J., & Paolillo, J. G. P. (2007). Consumers’ ethical beliefs: The roles of money, religiosity and attitude toward business. Journal of Business Ethics 73, 369–379.Google Scholar
Watanabe, S., & Laurent, S. M. (2021). Past its prime? A methodological overview and critique of religious priming research in social psychology. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 6(1–2), 22–46.Google Scholar
Weinberger, M. F. (2015). Dominant consumption rituals and intragroup boundary work: How non-celebrants manage conflicting relational and identity goals. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(3), 378–400.Google Scholar
Westacott, E. (2016). The Wisdom of Frugality. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkes, R. E., Burnett, J. J., & Howell, R. D. (1986). On the meaning and measurement of religiosity in consumer research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 14(1), 47–56.Google Scholar
WorthingtonJr., E. L. (2005). Initial questions about the art and science of forgiving. In WorthingtonJr., E. L. (Ed.). Handbook of Forgiveness (pp. 1–14). Routledge.Google Scholar
Worthington, Jr., Wade, E. L., Hight, N. G., et al, T. L.. (2003). The Religious Commitment Inventory--10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(1), 84–96.Google Scholar
Wu, E. C., & Cutright, K. M. (2018). In God’s hands: How reminders of God dampen the effectiveness of fear appeals. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(1), 119–131.Google Scholar

References

Adichie, N. C. (2009). The danger of a single story. TED Global, www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_ngozi_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story/transcript?language=enGoogle Scholar
Alaei, R., Deska, J. C., Hugenberg, K., & Rule, N. O. (2022). People attribute humanness to men and women differently based on their facial appearance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(2), 400–422.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice (pp. xviii, 537). Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Amarante, V., Burger, R., Chelwa, G., et al. (2021). Underrepresentation of developing country researchers in development research. Applied Economics Letters, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1965528Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. Culture and Public Action, 59, 62–63.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., & Kreiner, G. E. (2014). Dirty work and dirtier work: Differences in countering physical, social, and moral stigma. Management and Organization Review, 10(1), 81–108.Google Scholar
Aslani, S., Ramirez-Marin, J., Brett, J., et al. (2016). Dignity, face, and honor cultures: A study of negotiation strategy and outcomes in three cultures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(8), 1178–1201.Google Scholar
Atwell, J. E. (1986). The principle of humanity. In Ends and Principles in Kant’s Moral Thought (pp. 105–137). Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Vol. 22. Springer.Google Scholar
Ayers, E. L. (1986). Vengeance and Justice: Crime and Punishment in the 19th-Century American South (Reprint edition). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180.Google Scholar
Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2012). Poor Economics. Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2020). Good Economics for Hard Times: Better Answers to Our Biggest Problems. Penguin.Google Scholar
Beach, M. C., Sugarman, J., Johnson, R. L., Arbelaez, J. J., Duggan, P. S., & Cooper, L. A. (2005). Do patients treated with dignity report higher satisfaction, adherence, and receipt of preventive care? The Annals of Family Medicine, 3(4), 331–338.Google Scholar
Berg, P., & Frost, A. (2005). Dignity at work for low wage, low skill service workers. Industrial Relations, 60(4), 657–682.Google Scholar
Bernard, T., Dercon, S., Orkin, K., & Taffesse, A. (2014). The Future in Mind: Aspirations and Forward-Looking Behaviour in Rural Ethiopia (p. 10224). Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C. (2002). The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms (Illustrated edition). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Block, N. (1995). Some concepts of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(2), Article 2.Google Scholar
Bloustein, E. J. (1984). Privacy as an aspect of human dignity: An answer to Dean Prosser. New York University Law Review, 39, 156–202.Google Scholar
Boeckmann, R. J., & Tyler, T. R. (2002). Trust, respect, and the psychology of political engagement 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(10), 2067–2088.Google Scholar
Boiger, M., De Deyne, S., & Mesquita, B. (2013). Emotions in “the world”: Cultural practices, products, and meanings of anger and shame in two individualist cultures. Frontiers in Psychology, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00867Google Scholar
Bond, M. H., Brislin, R. W., Chiu, C., et al. (2009). The present and future state of cultural research and theory: A dialogue. In Understanding Culture: Theory, Research, and Application (pp. 469–506). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Botti, S., & Iyengar, S. S. (2006). The dark side of choice: When choice impairs social welfare. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 24–38.Google Scholar
Campbell, B., & Manning, J. (2014). Microaggression and moral cultures. Comparative Sociology, 13(6), 692–726.Google Scholar
Chance, P. (2007). The ultimate challenge: Prove B. F. Skinner wrong. The Behavior Analyst, 30(2), 153–160.Google Scholar
Chaney, K. E., Sanchez, D. T., & Maimon, M. R. (2019). Stigmatized-identity cues in consumer spaces. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 130–141.Google Scholar
Chang, H. (2010, October). Poverty, Entrepreneurship and Development. United Nations University Blog. www.wider.unu.edu/publication/povertyentrepreneurship-and-developmentGoogle Scholar
Chmielewski, M., & Kucker, S. C. (2020). An MTurk crisis? Shifts in data quality and the impact on study results. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 464–473.Google Scholar
Chochinov, H. M. (2002). Dignity-conserving care – A new model for palliative care: Helping the patient feel valued. JAMA, 287(17), 2253–2260.Google Scholar
Cohen, D., & Kitayama, S. (2007). Cultural psychology: This stanza and the next. In Kitayama, S., & Cohen, D. (Eds.). Handbook of Cultural Psychology (pp. 847–851). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014). The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 333–371.Google Scholar
Crockett, D. (2017). Paths to respectability: Consumption and stigma management in the contemporary black middle class. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 554–581.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. (1996). The Second Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, A. (2021). Dignity Is the Bedrock for Workplace Belonging. Stanford Social Innovation Review, https://ssir.org/articles/entry/dignity_is_the_bedrock_for_workplace_belongingGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D. (2002). Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: The importance of feeling included. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1335–1341.Google Scholar
De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005a) Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. In Zanna, M. (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37 (pp. 151–218). Academic Press.Google Scholar
De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005b). A matter of intragroup status: The importance of respect for the viability of groups. In Mannix, B., Neal, M., & Thoman-Hunt, M. (Eds.). Research on Managing Groups and Teams (p. 121). (Status and groups; No. 7). Elsevier.Google Scholar
Debes, R. (2017). Dignity: A History. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Major, B., & Crocker, J. (2000). Stigma: Introduction and overview. In Heatherton, T. F., Kleck, R. E., Hebl, M. R., & Hull, J. G. (Eds.). The Social Psychology of Stigma (pp. 1–28). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dunning, D., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (2016). Chapter One – The psychology of respect: A case study of how behavioral norms regulate human action. In Elliot, A. J. (Ed.). Advances in Motivation Science, Vol. 3 (pp. 1–34). Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2013). Justice for Hedgehogs (Reprint edition). Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2004). Sources of respect: The effects of being liked by ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(2), 155–172.Google Scholar
Elshout, M., Nelissen, R. M. A., & van Beest, I. (2017). Conceptualising humiliation. Cognition and Emotion, 31(8), 1581–1594.Google Scholar
Eriksson, K., Strimling, P., Gelfand, M., et al. (2021). Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1481.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (2011). Envy Up, Scorn Down: How Status Divides Us. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & Markus, H. R. (2012). Facing Social Class: How Societal Rank Influences Interaction. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Flitter, E. (2020, February 21). The Price of Wells Fargo’s Fake Account Scandal Grows by $3 Billion. New York Times, www.nytimes.com/2020/02/21/business/wells-fargo-settlement.htmlGoogle Scholar
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2012, January 12) The drive for dignity. Foreign Policy, http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/01/12/the-drive-for-dignity/Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2018). Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Fuller, R. (2003). Somebodies and Nobodies: Overcoming the Abuse of Rank. New Societies Publishers.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., et al. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of a Spoiled Identity. Simon and Schuster Inc.Google Scholar
Hall, C. C., Zhao, J., & Shafir, E. (2014). Self-affirmation among the poor: Cognitive and behavioral implications. Psychological Science, 25(2), 619–625.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K., Piacentini, M., Banister, E., et al. (2014). Poverty in consumer culture: Towards a transformative social representation. Journal of Marketing Management, 30, 1833–1857.Google Scholar
Hamilton, P., Redman, T., & McMurray, R. (2019). ‘Lower than a snake’s belly’: Discursive constructions of dignity and heroism in low-status garbage work. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 889–901.Google Scholar
Harcum, E. R. (1994). A Psychology of Freedom and Dignity: The Last Train to Survival. Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Harmeling, C. M., Mende, M., Scott, M. L., & Palmatier, R. W. (2021). Marketing, through the eyes of the stigmatized. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(2), 223–245.Google Scholar
Hartling, L. M., & Lindner, E. G. (2017). Toward a globally informed psychology of humiliation: Comment on McCauley (2017). American Psychologist, 72(7), 705–706.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4), 766–794.Google Scholar
Henderson, G. R., & Williams, J. D. (2013). From exclusion to inclusion: An introduction to the special issue on marketplace diversity and inclusion. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32, 1–5.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29.Google Scholar
Ho, D. Y. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 867–884.Google Scholar
Hodson, R. (2001). Dignity at Work. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holloway, K. (2019). Dignity in displacement: Case studies from Afghanistan, Colombia, the Philippines and South Sudan Overseas Development Institute. www.odi.org/publications/11285-dignity-displacement-case-studies-afghanistan-colombia-philippines-and-south-sudanGoogle Scholar
Holloway, K., & Grandi, F. (2018, June). Dignity in Displacement: A Review of the LIterature. Overseas Development Institute. www.odi.org/publications/11148-dignity-displacement-review-literatureGoogle Scholar
Hübenthal, C. H. (2014). Human dignity: Can a historical foundation alone suffice? From Joas’ affirmative genealogy to Kierkegaard’s leap of faith. In Düwell, M., Braavig, J., Brownsword, R., & Mieth, D. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 208–214). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huo, Y. J., & Binning, K. R. (2008). Why the psychological experience of respect matters in group life: An integrative account. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(4), 1570–1585.Google Scholar
Huo, Y. J., Binning, K. R., & Begeny, , C. (2014). Respect and the viability of ethnically diverse institutions. In Otten, S., Van der Zee, K. I., & Brewer, M. (Eds.). Toward Inclusive Organizations: Determinants of Successful Diversity Management at Work (pp. 49–66). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Huo, Y. J., Binning, K. R., & Molina, L. E. (2010a). Testing an integrative model of respect: Implications for social engagement and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), 200–212.Google Scholar
Huo, Y. J., Binning, K. R., & Molina, L. E. (2010b). Chapter 4 The Interplay between fairness and the experience of respect: Implications for group life. In Mannix, E. A., Neale, M. A., & Mullen, E. (Eds.). Fairness and Groups, Vol. 13 (pp. 95–120). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Huo, Y. J., & Molina, L. E. (2006). Is pluralism a viable model of diversity? The benefits and limits of subgroup respect. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(3), 359–376.Google Scholar
Hurley, L. (2018, June 4). U.S. Supreme Court backs Christian baker who rebuffed gay couple. Reuters, www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-baker-idUSKCN1J01WUGoogle Scholar
IJzerman, H., & Cohen, D. (2011). Grounding cultural syndromes: Body comportment and values in honor and dignity cultures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 456–467.Google Scholar
Jacobson, N. (2009). Dignity violation in health care. Qualitative Health Research, 19(11), 1536–1547.Google Scholar
Kerbo, H. R. (1976). The stigma of welfare and a passive poor. Sociology & Social Research, 60(2), 173–187.Google Scholar
Khatry, P., Manokara, K., & Harris, L. T. (2021). Socioeconomic status and dehumanization in India: Elaboration of the stereotype content model in a non-WEIRD sample. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(6), 908–919.Google Scholar
Killmister, S. (2010). Dignity: Not such a useless concept. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(3), 160–164.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.-H., Chiu, C.-Y., & Zou, Z. (2010). Know thyself: Misperceptions of actual performance undermine achievement motivation, future performance, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 395–409.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.-H., Cohen, D., & Au, W.-T. (2010). The jury and abjury of my peers: The self in face and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 904.Google Scholar
Laham, S. M., Chopra, S., Lalljee, M., & Parkinson, B. (2010). Emotional and behavioral reactions to moral transgressions: Cross‐cultural and individual variations in India and Britain. International Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 64–71.Google Scholar
Laham, S. M., Tam, T., Lalljee, M., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2010). Respect for persons in the intergroup context: Self – other overlap and intergroup emotions as mediators of the impact of respect on action tendencies. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(3), 301–317.Google Scholar
Lalljee, M., Evans, G., Sarawgi, S., & Voltmer, K. (2013). Respect your enemies: Orientations towards political opponents and political involvement in Britain. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(1), 119–131.Google Scholar
Lalljee, M., Laham, S. M., & Tam, T. (2007). Unconditional respect for persons: A social psychological analysis. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 38(4), 451–464.Google Scholar
Lalljee, M., Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Laham, S., & Lee, J. (2009). Unconditional respect for persons and the prediction of intergroup action tendencies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), 666–683.Google Scholar
Lamberton, C. (2019). Toward a dignity architecture: The critical challenges of stigmatized-identity cues for consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 152–159.Google Scholar
Lamberton, C., Saldanha, N., & Ghai, S. (2020). Introducing System Zero: The Drive for Marketplace Dignity (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3745882). Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
LaVaque-Manty, M. (2006). Dueling for equality. Political Theory, 34(6), 715–740.Google Scholar
Leung, A. K.-Y., & Cohen, D. (2011). Within-and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 507.Google Scholar
LeVine, R. A. (2001). Culture and personality studies, 1918–1960: Myth and history. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 803–818.Google Scholar
Lieberman, E. S. (2016). Can the biomedical research cycle be a model for political science? Perspectives on Politics, 14(4), 1054–1066.Google Scholar
Liu, P. J., Lamberton, C., Bettman, J. R., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2019). Delicate snowflakes and broken bonds: A conceptualization of consumption-based offense. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(6), 1164–1193.Google Scholar
Lynch, D. (1996) The heavy issue: Weight-based discrimination in the airline industry, 62. Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 203.Google Scholar
Macklin, R. (2003). Dignity is a useless concept. BMJ, 327(7429), 1419–1420.Google Scholar
Marcus, L. (2020, February 28). Are fat fliers being discriminated against by airlines? CNN travel, www.cnn.com/travel/article/body-size-airplane-seats-intl-hnk/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Mattson, D. J., & Clark, S. G. (2011). Human dignity in concept and practice. Policy Sciences, 44(4), 303–319.Google Scholar
McCauley, C. (2017). Toward a psychology of humiliation in asymmetric conflict. American Psychologist, 72(3), 255–265.Google Scholar
Metz, T. (2010). Human dignity, capital punishment, and an African moral theory: Toward a new philosophy of human rights. Journal of Human Rights, 9(1), 81–99.Google Scholar
Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 527–553.Google Scholar
Miller, W. I. (1993). Humiliation: And Other Essays on Honor, Social Discomfort, and Violence. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Molefe, M. (2018). Personhood and (rectification) justice in African thought. Politikon, 45(3), 352–367.Google Scholar
Moller, A. C., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-determination theory and public policy: Improving the quality of consumer decisions without using coercion. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 104–116.Google Scholar
Mosel, I., & Holloway, K. (2019). Dignity and Humanitarian Action in Displacement. Overseas Development Institute.www.odi.org/publications/11293-dignity-and-humanitarian-action-displacementGoogle Scholar
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, J., McFerran, B., Morales, A., & Dahl, D. (2016). Wealth and welfare: Divergent moral reactions to ethical consumer choices. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(April), 879–896.Google Scholar
Osborne, D., Huo, Y. J., & Smith, H. J. (2015). Organizational respect dampens the impact of group-based relative deprivation on willingness to protest pay cuts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 159–175.Google Scholar
Pagliaro, S., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2011). Sharing moral values: Anticipated ingroup respect as a determinant of adherence to morality-based (but not competence-based) group norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(8), 1117–1129.Google Scholar
Paller, J. W. (2019). Dignified public expression: A new logic of political accountability. Comparative Politics, 52(1), 85–104.Google Scholar
Patel, N. (2021). Research compensation. The Dignity Project, https://dignityproject.net/research-compensation/Google Scholar
Perry, G. (2013). Behind the Shock Machine: The Untold Story of the Notorious Milgram Psychology Experiments, The New Press.Google Scholar
Pitt-Rivers, J. (1968). Honor. Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 6 (pp. 505–506). Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2008, May 27). The Stupidity of Dignity. The New Republic, https://newrepublic.com/article/64674/the-stupidity-dignityGoogle Scholar
Prestwich, A., & Lalljee, M. (2009). The determinants and consequences of intragroup respect: An examination within a sporting context. Erratum. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(8), 2020.Google Scholar
Quenqua, D. (2017, April 5). Pepsi says ‘sorry’ and removes Kendall Jenner ad from the web. PR Week, www.prweek.com/article/1429761/pepsi-says-sorry-removes-kendall-jenner-adwebGoogle Scholar
Roderick, L. (2017, December 20). Why are advertisers still failing to represent lesbians? Marketing Week, www.marketingweek.com/lesbians-advertising/Google Scholar
Rosen, M. (2012). Dignity: Its History and Meaning. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roussi, A. (2020, September 9). Kenyan borrowers shamed by debt collectors chasing Silicon Valley loans. Financial Times, www.ft.com/content/16c86479-e88d-4a28-8fa4-cd72bace5104Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (1999). Disgust: The body and soul emotion. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, 429, 445.Google Scholar
Saetra, H. S. (2019). When nudge comes to shove: Liberty and nudging in the era of big data. Technology in Society, 59, 101130.Google Scholar
Sayer, A. (2007). Dignity at work: Broadening the agenda. Organization, 14(4), 565–581.Google Scholar
Schaber, P. (2014). Human rights and human dignity: A reply to Doris Schroeder. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17(1), 155–161.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K. (2019). Epistemic Justice and Epistemic Participation. Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 1787. https://doi.org/10.7936/s8g9-5w13Google Scholar
Schroeder, D., & Bani-Sadr, A. H. (2017). Dignity in the 21st century: Middle east and west. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Schroeder, J., & Epley, N. (2020). Demeaning: Dehumanizing others by minimizing the importance of their psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(4), 765–791.Google Scholar
Schultz, H. (n.d.). Management and Leadership Quotes.https://management-quotes.net/authors/Howard_Schultz/quote/2817Google Scholar
Semuels, A. (2018, January, 23). The Internet Is Enabling a New Kind of Poorly Paid Hell. The Atlantic, www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2018/01/amazon-mechanical-turk/551192/Google Scholar
Sen, A. ( 1993). Capability and well-being. In Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (Eds.). The Quality of Life (pp. 30–53). Clarendon Press,Google Scholar
Sensen, O. (2011). Kant on Human Dignity. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. (2019). The impact of recipient choice on aid effectiveness. World Development, 116, 137–149.Google Scholar
Sharkey, A. (2014). Robots and human dignity: A consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people. Ethics and Information Technology, 16, 63–75.Google Scholar
Shipow, A., & Singh, A. (2020, June 26). Is your data inclusive? Optimizing results by eliminating the hidden costs of research participation? Busara Center Blog, https://medium.com/busaracenter-blog/is-your-data-inclusive-ddd59933f108Google Scholar
Simon, B., Eschert, S., Schaefer, C. D., Reininger, K. M., Zitzmann, S., & Smith, H. J. (2019). Disapproved, but tolerated: The role of respect in outgroup tolerance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(3), 406–415.Google Scholar
Simon, B., Mommert, A., & Renger, D. (2015). Reaching across group boundaries: Respect from outgroup members facilitates recategorization as a common group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(4), 616–628.Google Scholar
Simon, B., & Stürmer, S. (2003). Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(2), 183–193.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond Freedom and Dignity. Hackett Publishing Co, Inc.Google Scholar
Sleebos, E., Ellemers, N., & de Gilder, D. (2006). The paradox of the disrespected: Disrespected group members’ engagement in group-serving efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(4), 413–427.Google Scholar
Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1997). Choosing the right pond: The impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2), 146–170.Google Scholar
Sperling, G. (2020). Economic Dignity. Penguin Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In Nelson, C., & Grossberg, L. (Eds.). Marxism and Interpretation of Culture. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2015). Fifty shades of manipulation. Journal of Behavioral Marketing, 213.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2021). Sludge: What Stops Us from Getting Things Done and What to Do about It. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. C., Otis, N. G., Abraham, J. R., Markus, H. R., & Walton, G. M. (2020). Toward a science of delivering aid with dignity: Experimental evidence and local forecasts from Kenya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27), 15546–15553.Google Scholar
Trzaskowski, J. (2021). Your Privacy Is Important to Us! – Restoring Human Dignity in Data-Driven Marketing. Copenhagen Business School, CBS LAW Research Paper No. 21-10, Ex Tuto Publishing, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3979053Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1999). Justice, social identity, and group processes. In Tyler, T. R., Kramer, R. M., & John, O. P. (Eds.).The Psychology of the Social Self (pp. 223–264). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
van Quaquebeke, N., Henrich, D. C., & Eckloff, T. (2007). It’s not tolerance I’m asking for, it’s respect! A conceptual framework to differentiate between tolerance, acceptance and (two types of) respect. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 38(2), 185–200.Google Scholar
Van Susteren, E. (2019). Your respondents want you to start treating them like human beings. Survey Monkey, www.surveymonkey.com/curiosity/your-respondents-want-you-to-start-treating-them-like-human-beings/Google Scholar
Vogt, H. (2018, April 2). You Weren’t Born in 1905? Why People Lie to Facebook. The Wall Street Journal, www.wsj.com/articles/you-werent-born-in-1910-why-people-lie-to-facebook-1522682361Google Scholar
Voltmer, K., & Lalljee, M. (2007). Agree to disagree respect for political opponents. In Park, A., Curtice, J., Thomson, K., Phillips, M., & Johnson, M. (Eds.). British Social Attitudes: The 23rd Report (pp. 95–118). SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Waldron, J., & Dan-Cohen, M. (2012). Dignity, Rank, and Rights. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451.Google Scholar
Weigmann, K. (2015). The ethics of global clinical trials: In developing countries, participation in clinical trials is sometimes the only way to access medical treatment. What should be done to avoid exploitation of disadvantaged populations? EMBO reports, 16(5), 566–570.Google Scholar
Wein, T. (2020a). Dignity and development: A review of the literature on its application, definition and measurement. Working Paper. https://dignityproject.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Wein-Dignity-Literature-Review-291120.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wein, T. (2020b). A research agenda for dignity in international development. Working Paper. https://dignityproject.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wein-Research-Agenda-Working-Paper-041220.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wein, T., Khatry, P., & Bhimani, R. (2022). A five-item survey measure of Felt Respect for Dignity. https://osf.io/vg2ac/Google Scholar
Wein, T., Lanthorn, H., & Fischer, T. (2022). First steps toward building respectful development require overcoming misalignments: three experiments on dignity in aid in Kenya and the United States. IDinsight (working paper). DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/RCWV2Google Scholar
Wherry, D. F. F., & Woodward, D. I. (Eds.). (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Consumption (Illustrated edition). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wherry, F. F., Seefeldt, K. S., Alvarez, A. S., & Quinonez, J. (2019). Credit Where It’s Due: Rethinking Financial Citizenship. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Wofford, B. (2020, July 19). The Heroic Story of How Jose Andres’ Charity Feeds 250,000 People a Day in a Pandemic. Washingtonian, https://www.washingtonian.com/2020/07/19/world-central-kitchen-jose-andres-how-youfeed-250000-people-pandemic/Google Scholar
Wolf, R. (2018). Supreme Court Rules on Narrow Grounds for Baker who Refused to Create Same-Sex Couple’s Wedding Cake. USA Today, www.washingtonian.com/2020/07/19/world-central-kitchen-jose-andres-how-you-feed-250000-people-pandemic/Google Scholar
World Food Program USA. (2019, January 22). What WFP Delivers: Cash, Vouchers and E-Cards. World Food Program, www.wfpusa.org/articles/what-wfp-delivers-cash-vouchers-and-e-cards/Google Scholar
Yao, J., Ramirez-Marin, J., Brett, J., Aslani, S., & Semnani-Azad, Z. (2017). A measurement model for dignity, face, and honor cultural norms. Management and Organization Review, 13(4), 713–738.Google Scholar

References

Andersen, S. M., & Przybylinski, E. (2018). Shared reality in interpersonal relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 42–46.Google Scholar
Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Manchanda, R. V. (2005). The influence of mere social presence in a retail context. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 207–212.Google Scholar
Ariely, D., & Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 279–290.Google Scholar
Bassili, J. N. (2003). The minority slowness effect: Subtle inhibitions in the expression of views not shared by others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 261–276.Google Scholar
Bhargave, R., & Montgomery, N. V. (2013). The social context of temporal sequences: Why first impressions shape shared experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 501–517.Google Scholar
Bhargave, R. P., Montgomery, N. V., & Redden, J. P. (2018). Collective satiation: How coexperience accelerates a decline in hedonic judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 529–546.Google Scholar
Boothby, E. J., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2014). Shared experiences are amplified. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2209–2216.Google Scholar
Boothby, E. J., Smith, L. K., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2016). Psychological distance moderates the amplification of shared experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(10), 1431–1444.Google Scholar
Boothby, E. J., Smith, L. K., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2017). The world looks better together: How close others enhance our visual experiences. Personal Relationships, 24(3), 694–714.Google Scholar
Brick, D. J., Fitzsimons, G. M., Chartrand, T. L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2018). Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand compatibility, relationship power, and life satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 991–1014.Google Scholar
Brick, D. J., Zhou, L., Chartrand, T. L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2022). Better to decide together: Shared consumer decision making, perceived power, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(3), 387–405.Google Scholar
Burnkrant, R. E., & Cousineau, A. (1975). Informational and normative social influence in buyer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3), 206–215.Google Scholar
Caprariello, P. A., & Reis, H. T. (2013). To do, to have, or to share? Valuing experiences over material possessions depends on the involvement of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 199–215.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, L. A. (2016). Consumer behavior in close relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 101–106.Google Scholar
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84.Google Scholar
Dzhogleva, H., & Lamberton, C. P. (2014). Should birds of a feather flock together? Understanding self-control decisions in dyads. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 361–380.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, G. M., Houston, M. B., Jiang, B., Lamberton, C., Rindfleisch, A., & Zervas, G. (2019). Marketing in the sharing economy. Journal of Marketing, 83(5), 5–27.Google Scholar
Epp, A. M., Schau, H. J., & Price, L. L. (2014). The role of brands and mediating technologies in assembling long-distance family practices. Journal of Marketing, 78(3), 81–101.Google Scholar
Etkin, J. (2016). Choosing variety for joint consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(6), 1019–1033.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. J., Grégoire, Y., & Murray, K. B. (2011). The limited effects of power on satisfaction with joint consumption decisions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(3), 277–289.Google Scholar
Garbinsky, E. N., & Gladstone, J. J. (2019). The consumption consequences of couples pooling finances. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(3), 353–369.Google Scholar
Garcia-Rada, X., Anik, L., & Ariely, D. (2019). Consuming together (versus separately) makes the heart grow fonder. Marketing Letters, 30(1), 27–43.Google Scholar
Garcia-Rada, X., & Kim, T. (2021). Shared time scarcity and the pursuit of extraordinary experiences. Psychological Science, 32(12), 1871–1883.Google Scholar
Gorlin, M., & Dhar, R. (2012). Bridging the gap between joint and individual decisions: Deconstructing preferences in relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 320–323.Google Scholar
Guerin, B. (1986). Mere presence effects in humans: A review. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(1), 38–77.Google Scholar
Hagen, L., Krishna, A., & McFerran, B. (2019). Outsourcing responsibility for indulgent food consumption to prevent negative affect. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 4(2), 136–146.Google Scholar
Haj-Mohamadi, P., Fles, E. H., & Shteynberg, G. (2018). When can shared attention increase affiliation? On the bonding effects of co-experienced belief affirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75(March 2018), 103–106.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R., Ferraro, R., Haws, K. L., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2021). Traveling with companions: The social customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 68–92.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. W. (2021). Shared Consumption Experiences. Impact at JMR, www.ama.org/shared-consumption-experiences-2/Google Scholar
Hasford, J., Kidwell, B., & Lopez-Kidwell, V. (2018). Happy wife, happy life: Food choices in romantic relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1238–1256.Google Scholar
Inman, J. J., Campbell, M. C., Kirmani, A., & Price, L. L. (2018). Our vision for the Journal of Consumer Research: It’s all about the consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 955–959.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780.Google Scholar
Kovacheva, A., & Lamberton, C. (2018). Whose experience is it, anyway? Psychological ownership and enjoyment of shared experiences. In Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (Eds.). Psychological Ownership and Consumer Behavior (pp. 195–210). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Kumar, A., & Gilovich, T. (2015). Some “thing” to talk about? Differential story utility from experiential and material purchases. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(10), 1320–1331.Google Scholar
Kurt, D., Inman, J. J., & Argo, J. J. (2011). The influence of friends on consumer spending: The role of agency–communion orientation and self-monitoring. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(4), 741–754.Google Scholar
Kwon, T. A., & Liu, P. J. (2021). Shared-solitary combined experiences: The desire for some solitary time in social consumption experiences. In Bradford, T. W., Keinan, A., & Thomson, M. (Eds.). Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 49 (pp. 593–598). Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96.Google Scholar
Liu, P. J. (2022). Frequency versus intensity: How thinking of a frequent consumption indulgence as social versus solitary affects preferences for how to cut back. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(3), 497–516.Google Scholar
Liu, P. J., Campbell, T. H., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2013). Matching choices to avoid offending stigmatized group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 291–304.Google Scholar
Liu, P. J., Dallas, S. K., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2019). A framework for understanding consumer choices for others. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 407–434.Google Scholar
Liu, P. J., & Kwon, T. A. (2022). Predicting others’ social interaction preferences: What to do, for how long, and how often. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 139–145.Google Scholar
Liu, P. J., Lamberton, C., Bettman, J. R., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2019). Delicate snowflakes and broken bonds: A conceptualization of consumption-based offense. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(6), 1164–1193.Google Scholar
Liu, P. J., McFerran, B., & Haws, K. L. (2020). Mindful matching: Ordinal versus nominal attributes. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(1), 134–155.Google Scholar
Liu, P. J., & Min, K. E. (2020). Where do you want to go for dinner? A preference expression asymmetry in joint consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1037–1054.Google Scholar
Lorenz, T., Griffith, E., & Isaac, M. (2021). We live in Zoom now. New York Times, www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/style/zoom-parties-coronavirus-memes.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lowe, M., Nikolova, H., Miller, C. J., & Dommer, S. L. (2019). Ceding and succeeding: How the altruistic can benefit from the selfish in joint decisions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(4), 652–661.Google Scholar
Lowe, M. L., & Haws, K. L. (2014). (Im)moral support: The social outcomes of parallel self-control decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 489–505.Google Scholar
Lund, S., Madgavkar, A., Manyika, J., et al. (2021). The future of work after COVID-19. McKinsey Global Institute, www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/the-future-of-work-after-covid-19Google Scholar
McFerran, B., & Argo, J. J. (2014). The entourage effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 871–884.Google Scholar
Min, K. E., Liu, P. J., & Kim, S. (2018). Sharing extraordinary experiences fosters feelings of closeness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(1), 107–121.Google Scholar
Morales, A. C., Amir, O., & Lee, L. (2017). Keeping it real in experimental research-understanding when, where, and how to enhance realism and measure consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), 465–476.Google Scholar
Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C. P., & West, P. M. (2012). Beyond the “like” button: The impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings. Journal of Marketing, 76(6), 105–120.Google Scholar
Nikolova, H., & Lamberton, C. (2016). Men and the middle: Gender differences in dyadic compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(3), 355–371.Google Scholar
Nikolova, H., Lamberton, C., & Coleman, N. V. (2018). Stranger danger: When and why consumer dyads behave less ethically than individuals. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 90–108.Google Scholar
Nikolova, H., & Nenkov, G. Y. (2022). We succeeded together, now what: Relationship power and sequential decisions in couples’ joint goal pursuits. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(2), 271–289.Google Scholar
Pozharliev, R., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., Van Strien, J. W., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2015). Merely being with you increases my attention to luxury products: Using EEG to understand consumers’ emotional experience with luxury branded products. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 546–558.Google Scholar
Raghunathan, R., & Corfman, K. (2006). Is happiness shared doubled and sadness shared halved? Social influence on enjoyment of hedonic experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 386–394.Google Scholar
Ramanathan, S., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Consuming with others: Social influences on moment-to-moment and retrospective evaluations of an experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 506–524.Google Scholar
Ratner, R. K., & Hamilton, R. W. (2015). Inhibited from bowling alone. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 266–283.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., O’Keefe, S. D., & Lane, R. D. (2017). Fun is more fun when others are involved. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(6), 547–557.Google Scholar
Ren, D., Stavrova, O., & Loh, W. W. (2022). Nonlinear effect of social interaction quantity on psychological well-being: Diminishing returns or inverted U? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(6), 1056–1074.Google Scholar
Rossignac-Milon, M., Bolger, N., Zee, K. S., Boothby, E. J., & Higgins, E. T. (2021). Merged minds: Generalized shared reality in dyadic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 882–911.Google Scholar
Rossignac-Milon, M., & Higgins, E. T. (2018). Epistemic companions: Shared reality development in close relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 66–71.Google Scholar
Shteynberg, G. (2015). Shared attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(5), 579–590.Google Scholar
Shteynberg, G., Hirsh, J. B., Apfelbaum, E. P., Larsen, J. T., Galinsky, A. D., & Roese, N. J. (2014). Feeling more together: Group attention intensifies emotion. Emotion, 14(6), 1102–1114.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Griskevicius, V., & Rothman, A. J. (2012). Consumer decisions in relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 304–314.Google Scholar
Steffel, M., & Williams, E. F. (2018). Delegating decisions: Recruiting others to make choices we might regret. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1015–1032.Google Scholar
Sun, J., Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2020). Is well-being associated with the quantity and quality of social interactions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1478–1496.Google Scholar
Thomas, T. C., Epp, A. M., & Price, L. L. (2020). Journeying together: Aligning retailer and service provider roles with collective consumer practices. Journal of Retailing, 96(1), 9–24.Google Scholar
Tu, Y., Shaw, A., & Fishbach, A. (2016). The friendly taking effect: How interpersonal closeness leads to seemingly selfish yet jointly maximizing choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 669–687.Google Scholar
Tu, Y., Yang, Y., & Fishbach, A. (2017). Friends with experiential benefits: The experience is more novel when experienced with others. In Gneezy, A., Griskevicius, V., & Williams, P. (Eds.). Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 45 (pp. 181–185). Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
vanDellen, M. R., & Baker, E. (2011). Implicit delegation of responsibility: Joint self-control in close relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(3), 277–283.Google Scholar
Wight, K. G., Liu, P. J., Bettman, J. R., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2022). Social relationships and consumer behavior. In Kahle, L. R., Lowrey, T. M., & Huber, J. (Eds.). APA Handbook of Consumer Psychology (pp. 351–372). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Woolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2017). A recipe for friendship: Similar food consumption promotes trust and cooperation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Woolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2019). Shared plates, shared minds: Consuming from a shared plate promotes cooperation. Psychological Science, 30(4), 541–552.Google Scholar
Wu, E. C., Moore, S. G., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2019). Wine for the table: Self-construal, group size, and choice for self and others. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 508–527.Google Scholar
Wu, Y., Hamilton, R. W., Kim, N. Y. J., & Ratner, R. K. (2021). Navigating shared consumption experiences: Clarity about a partner’s interests increases enjoyment. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(3), 439–455.Google Scholar

References

Airoldi, M. (2021). Digital traces of taste: Methodological pathways for consumer research. Consumption Markets & Culture, 24(1), 97–117.Google Scholar
Alvarez, C., Brick, D. J., & Fournier, S. (2021). Doing relationship work: A theory of change in consumer–brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(4), 610–632.Google Scholar
Arnould, E. J., & Rose, A. S. (2016). Mutuality: Critique and substitute for Belk’s ‘sharing’. Marketing Theory, 16(1), 75–99.Google Scholar
Aspara, J., & Wittkowski, K. (2019). Sharing-dominant logic? Quantifying the association between consumer intelligence and choice of social access modes. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(2), 201–222.Google Scholar
Atanasova, A., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2021). The broadening boundaries of materialism. Marketing Theory, 21(4), 481–500.Google Scholar
Atasoy, O., & Morewedge, C. K. (2018) Digital goods are valued less than physical goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1343–1357.Google Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., & Moore, D. J. (1994). Public service advertisements: Emotions and empathy guide prosocial behavior. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 56–70.Google Scholar
Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881–898.Google Scholar
Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2017) Liquid consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 582–597.Google Scholar
Bardhi, F., Eckhardt, G. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2012). Liquid relationship to possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 510–529.Google Scholar
Bardhi, F., Eckhardt, G. M., & Samsioe, E. (2020). Liquid luxury. In Morhart, F., Wilcox, K., & Czellar, S. (Eds.). Research Handbook on Luxury Branding (pp. 22–42). Research Handbooks in Business and Management series. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Barron, K., Kung, E., & Proserpio, D. (2021). The effect of home-sharing on house prices and rents: Evidence from Airbnb. Marketing Science, 40(1), 23–47.Google Scholar
Baumeister, C., Scherer, A., & Wangenheim, F. v. (2015). Branding access offers: The importance of product brands, ownership status, and spillover effects to parent brands. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(5), 574–588.Google Scholar
Baxter, W., & Aurisicchio, M. (2018). Ownership by design. In Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (Eds.). Psychological Ownership and Consumer Behavior (pp. 119–134). Springer.Google Scholar
Belk, R. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500.Google Scholar
Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (1988) Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (2007). Why not share rather than own? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 126–140.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715–734.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W., Eckhardt, G. M., & Bardhi, F. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of the Sharing Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2014). Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 226–233.Google Scholar
Buhalis, D., Andreu, L., & Gnoth, J. (2020). The dark side of the sharing economy: Balancing value co-creation and value co-destruction. Psychology & Marketing, 37(5), 689–704.Google Scholar
Caldwell, M., Elliot, S., Henry, P., & O’Connor, M. (2020). The impact of political ideology on consumer perceptions of their rights and responsibilities in the sharing economy. European Journal of Marketing, 54(8), 1909–1935.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2009). Possession and access: Consumer desires and value perceptions regarding contemporary art collection and exhibit visits. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 925–940.Google Scholar
Costello, J. P., & Reczek, R. W. (2020). Providers versus platforms: Marketing communications in the sharing economy. Journal of Marketing, 84(6), 22–38.Google Scholar
Cova, B., & Dalli, D. (2009). Working consumers: The next step in marketing theory? Marketing Theory, 9(3), 315–339.Google Scholar
Cova, B., Dalli, D., & Zwick, D. (2011). Critical perspectives on consumers’ role as ‘producers’: Broadening the debate on value co-creation in marketing processes. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 231–241.Google Scholar
Datta, H., Knox, G., & Bronnenberg, B. J. (2017). Changing their tune: How consumers’ adoption of online streaming affects music consumption and discovery. Available at SSRN, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2782911Google Scholar
Datta, H., Knox, G., & Bronnenberg, B. J. (2018). Changing their tune: How consumers’ adoption of online streaming affects music consumption and discovery. Marketing Science, 37(1), 5–21.Google Scholar
Davies, I., Oates, C. J., Tynan, C., et. al. (2020). Seeking sustainable futures in marketing and consumer research. European Journal of Marketing, 54(11), 2911–2939.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, G. M., & Bardhi, F. (2016). The relationship between access practices and economic systems. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(2), 210–225.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, G. M., & Bardhi, F. (2020). New dynamics of social status and distinction. Marketing Theory, 20(1), 85–102.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, G. M., Houston, M. B., Jiang, B., Lamberton, C., Rindfleisch, A., & Zervas, G. (2019). Marketing in the sharing economy. Journal of Marketing, 83(5), 5–27.Google Scholar
Ericson, K., & Fuster, A. (2011). Expectations as endowments: Evidence on reference-dependent preferences from exchange and valuation experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1879–1907.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, B., & Scaraboto, D. (2016). The systemic creation of value through circulation in collaborative consumer networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), 509–533.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, B., & Uncles, M. (2015). Moving across time and space: Temporal management and structuration of consumption in conditions of global mobility. Consumption Markets & Culture, 18(1), 39–54.Google Scholar
Firat, A. F., & Venkatesh, A. (1995). Liberatory postmodernism and the reenchantment of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 239–267.Google Scholar
Furby, L. (1991). Understanding the psychology of possession and ownership: A personal memoir and an appraisal of our progress. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(6), 457–463.Google Scholar
Furby, L. (1980). Collective possession and ownership: A study of its judged feasibility and desirability. Social Behavior and Personality, 8(2), 165–184.Google Scholar
Giesler, M. (2006). Consumer gift systems. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 283–290.Google Scholar
Graul, A. R. H., & Brough, A. R. (2020). Why we don’t rent what others love: The role of product attachment in consumer-to-consumer transactions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(2), 329–341.Google Scholar
Gruen, A. (2017). Design and the creation of meaningful consumption practices in access-based consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(3–4), 226–243.Google Scholar
Guyader, H. (2018). No one rides for free! Three styles of collaborative consumption. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(6), 692–714.Google Scholar
Harding, R. D., Hildebrand, D., Kramer, T., & Lasaleta, J. D. (2019). The impact of acquisition mode on expected speed of product mastery and subsequent consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(1), 140–158.Google Scholar
Hartl, B., Kamleitner, B., & Holub, S. (2020). Take me on a ride: The role of environmentalist identity for carpooling. Psychology & Marketing, 37(5), 663–676.Google Scholar
Hazée, S., Delcourt, C., & Van Vaerenbergh, Y. (2017). Burdens of access: Understanding customer barriers and barrier-attenuating practices in access-based services. Journal of Service Research, 20(4), 441–456.Google Scholar
Hellwig, K., Morhart, F., Girardin, F., & Hauser, M. (2015). Exploring different types of sharing: A proposed segmentation of the market for ‘sharing’ businesses. Psychology & Marketing, 32(9), 891–906.Google Scholar
Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 2056305115603080.Google Scholar
Hennig-Thurau, T., Henning, V., & Sattler, H. (2007). Consumer file sharing of motion pictures. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 1–8.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., et al. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hill, R. P., Cunningham, D., & Gentlemen, G. (2016). Dehumanization and restriction inside a maximum security prison: Novel insights about consumer acquisition and ownership. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(2), 295–313.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., Molesworth, M., & Scullion, R. (2014). The messy social lives of objects: Inter-personal borrowing and the ambiguity of possession and ownership. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(2), 131–139.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.Google Scholar
Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., & Angst, C. (2006). Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 781–804.Google Scholar
Kirk, C. P., Peck, J., & Swain, S. D. (2018). Property lines in the mind: Consumers’ psychological ownership and their territorial responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 148–168.Google Scholar
Kleijnen, M., Lee, N., & Wetzels, M. (2009). An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 344–357.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V., Ferreira, D. A., & Chimenti, P. (2021). How do platforms empower consumers? Insights from the affordances and constraints of Reclame Aqui. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(3), 428–455.Google Scholar
Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of consumer psychology, 22(3), 332–351.Google Scholar
Labrecque, L., vor dem Esche, J., Mathwick, C., Novak, T., & Hofacker, C. (2013) Consumer power: Evolution in the digital age. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 257–269.Google Scholar
Lamberton, C., & Goldsmith, K. (2020). Ownership: A perennial prize or a fading goal? A curation, framework, and agenda for future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(2), 301–309.Google Scholar
Lawson, S. J., Gleim, M. R., Perren, R., & Hwang, J. (2016). Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2615–2623.Google Scholar
Li, H., & Srinivasan, K. (2019). Competitive dynamics in the sharing economy: An analysis in the context of Airbnb and hotels. Marketing Science, 38(3), 365–391.Google Scholar
Lin, M., Miao, L., Wei, W., & Moon, H. (2019). Peer engagement behaviors: Conceptualization and research directions. Journal of Service Research, 22(4), 388–403.Google Scholar
Lovelock, C., & Gummesson, E. (2004). Whither services marketing? In search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. Journal of Services Research, 7(1), 20–41.Google Scholar
MacInnis, D. J., & Folkes, V. S. (2010). The disciplinary status of consumer behavior: A sociology of science perspective on key controversies. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 899–914.Google Scholar
Makkar, M., Yap, S-F., & Belk, R. (2020). Stabilising collaborative consumer networks: How technological mediation shapes relational work. European Journal of Marketing, 55(5), 1385–1410.Google Scholar
Mick, D. G., & Fournier, S. (1998) Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 123–143.Google Scholar
Moeller, S., & Wittkowski, K. (2010). The burdens of ownership: Reasons for preferring renting. Managing Service Quality, 20(2), 176–191.Google Scholar
Molesworth, M., Watkins, R., & Denegri-Knott, J. (2016). Possession work on hosted digital consumption objects as consumer ensnarement. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(2), 246–261.Google Scholar
Moncef, B., & Dupuy, M. M. (2021). Last-mile logistics in the sharing economy: Sustainability paradoxes. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 51(5), 508–527.Google Scholar
Morewedge, C. K., & Giblin, C. E. (2015). Explanations of the endowment effect: An integrative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 339–348.Google Scholar
Morewedge, C. K., Monga, A., Palmatier, R. W. Shu, S. B., & Small, D. A. (2021) Evolution of consumption: A psychological ownership framework. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 196–218.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A., & Kadiyali, V. (2011). Modeling multichannel home video demand in the U.S. motion picture industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(6), 985–995.Google Scholar
Osman, H., D’Acunto, D., & Johns, N. (2019) Home and away: Why do consumers shy away from reporting negative experiences in the peer-to-peer realms? Psychology & Marketing, 36(12), 1162–1175.Google Scholar
Osterhus, T. L. (1997) Pro-social consumer influence strategies: When and how do they work?. Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 16–29.Google Scholar
Oyedele, A., & Simpson, P. (2017) Emerging adulthood, sharing utilities and intention to use sharing services. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(2), 161–174.Google Scholar
Ozanne, L. K., & Ballantine, P. W. (2010) Sharing as a form of anti-consumption? An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 485–498.Google Scholar
Ozanne, L. K., & Ozanne, J. L. (2011). A child’s right to play: The social construction of civic virtues in toy libraries. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(2), 264–278.Google Scholar
Pantano, E., & Stylos, N. (2020). The Cinderella moment: Exploring consumers’ motivations to engage with renting as collaborative luxury consumption mode. Psychology & Marketing, 37(5), 740–753.Google Scholar
Papies, D., Eggers, F., & Wlömert, N. (2011). Music for free? How free ad-funded downloads affect consumer choice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(5), 777–794.Google Scholar
Peck, J., Barger, V. A., & Webb, A. (2013). In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 189–196.Google Scholar
Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003). Individual differences in haptic information processing: The ‘Need for Touch’ scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 430–342.Google Scholar
Peck, J., Kirk, C. P., Luangrath, A. W., & Shu, S. B. (2021). Caring for the commons: Using psychological ownership to enhance stewardship behavior for public goods. Journal of Marketing, 85(2), 33–49.Google Scholar
Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434–447.Google Scholar
Perren, R., & Kozinets, R. V. (2018). Lateral exchange markets: How social platforms operate in a networked economy. Journal of Marketing, 82(1), 20–36.Google Scholar
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107.Google Scholar
Price, L. L., & Belk, R. W. (2016) Consumer ownership and sharing: Introduction to the issue. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(2), 193–197.Google Scholar
Quinn, P. (2022). Global Consumer Media Usage Forecast 2021–2025. PQ Media, 9th annual. www.pqmedia.com/product/global-consumer-media-usage-forecast-2021-2025Google Scholar
Richins, M. L. (1994). Special possessions and the expression of material values. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 522–533.Google Scholar
Richins, M. L. (2017). Materialism pathways: The processes that create and perpetuate materialism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 480–499.Google Scholar
Rodgers, M., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., et al. (2009). Testing methodological guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: Effectiveness of interventions to promote smoke alarm ownership and function. Evaluation, 15(1), 49–73.Google Scholar
Roos, D., & Hahn, R. (2017). Does shared consumption affect consumers’ values, attitudes, and norms? A panel study. Journal of Business Research, 77, 113–123.Google Scholar
Rudmin, F., & Berry, J. (1987). Semantics of ownership: A free-recall study of property. The Psychological Record, 37(2), 257–268.Google Scholar
Scaraboto, D. (2015). Selling, sharing, and everything in between: The hybrid economies of collaborative networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 152–176.Google Scholar
Scaraboto, D., & Figueiredo, B. (2022). How consumer orchestration work creates value in the sharing economy. Journal of Marketing, 86(2), 29–47.Google Scholar
Schaefers, T., Lawson, S. J., & Kukar-Kinney, M. (2016). How the burdens of ownership promote consumer usage of access-based services. Marketing Letters, 27(3), 569–577.Google Scholar
Schaefers, T., Wittkowski, K., Benoit, S., & Ferraro, R. (2016). Contagious effects of customer misbehavior in access-based services. Journal of Service Research, 19(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Schafers, T., Narayanamurthy, G., Moser, R., & Leban, M. (2021). The sharing economy at the base of the economic pyramid: How access-based services can help overcome ownership risks. Psychology & Marketing, 38(11), 2073–2088.Google Scholar
Sharifonnasabi, Z., Bardhi, F., & Luedicke, M. K. (2020). How globalization affects consumers: Insights from 30 years of CCT globalization research. Marketing Theory, 20(3), 273–298.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G., & Tinson, J. (2017). Psychological ownership and music streaming consumption. Journal of Business Research, 71, 1–9.Google Scholar
Snare, F. (1972). The concept of property. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9(2), 200–206.Google Scholar
Stofberg, N., & Bridoux, F. (2019). Consumers’ choice among peer-to-peer sharing platforms: The other side of the coin. Psychology & Marketing, 36(12), 1176–1195.Google Scholar
Styvén, M. E., & Mariani, M. M. (2020). Understanding the intention to buy secondhand clothing on sharing economy platforms: The influence of sustainability, distance from the consumption system, and economic motivations. Psychology & Marketing, 37(5), 724–739.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. J., Henry, P. C., & Bardhi, F. (2018). Theorizing reactive reflexivity: Lifestyle displacement and discordant performances of taste. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 571–594.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.Google Scholar
Verboven, H., & Vanherck, L. (2016). The sustainability paradox of the sharing economy. UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 24(4), 303–314.Google Scholar
Viglia, G. (2020). The sharing economy: Psychological mechanisms that affect collaborative consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 37(5), 627–629.Google Scholar
von Richthofen, G., & Fischer, E. (2019). Airbnb and hybridized logics of commerce and hospitality. In Belk, R. W., Eckhardt, G. M., & Bardhi, F. (Eds.). Handbook of the Sharing Economy (pp. 193–207). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., John, D. R., & Griskevicious, V. (2021). Does the devil wear Prada? Luxury product experiences can affect prosocial behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(1), 104–119.Google Scholar
Watkins, R., & Molesworth, M. (2012). Attachment to digital virtual possessions in videogames. In Belk, R. W., Askegaard, S., & Scott, L. (Eds.). Research in Consumer Behavior (pp. 153–170). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Ellard, J. H. (2012). Belief in a just world: Consumer intentions and behaviors toward ethical products. Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 103–118.Google Scholar
Wlömert, N., & Papies, D. (2016). On-demand streaming services and music industry revenues – Insights from Spotify’s market entry. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(2), 314–327.Google Scholar
Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. W. (2017). The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel Industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(5), 687–705.Google Scholar

References

Alexander, D. L., & Moore, S. G. (2017). Everybody loves it, you’ve got to love it too! The downside of receiving more (and more) positive word of mouth. Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series, Report No. 17-102. www.msi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/MSI_Report_17-102-1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Allard, T., Dunn, L. H., & White, K. (2020). Negative reviews, positive impact: Consumer empathetic responding to unfair word of mouth. Journal of Marketing, 84(4), 86–108.Google Scholar
Ameri, M., Honka, E., & Xie, Y. (2019). Word of mouth, observed adoptions, and anime-watching decisions: The role of the personal vs. the community network. Marketing Science, 38(4), 567–583.Google Scholar
Antonetti, P., & Maklan, S. (2018). Identity bias in negative word of mouth following irresponsible corporate behaviour: A research model and moderating effects. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(1), 1005–1023.Google Scholar
Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79–95.Google Scholar
Arndt, J. (1967a). Word of Mouth Advertising. Advertising Research Foundation, Inc.Google Scholar
Arndt, J. (1967b). Role of product‐related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(3), 291–329.Google Scholar
Babić Rosario, A., de Valck, K., & Sotgiu, F. (2020). Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(3), 422–448.Google Scholar
Babić Rosario, A., Sotgiu, F., De Valck, K., & Bijmolt, T. H. (2016). The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta‐analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(3), 297–318.Google Scholar
Baker, A. M., Donthu, N., & Kumar, V. (2016). Investigating how word-of-mouth conversations about brands influence purchase and retransmission intention. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(2), 225–239.Google Scholar
Bambauer-Sachse, S., & Mangold, S. (2011). Brand equity dilution through negative online word-of-mouth communication. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18, 38–45.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S., Dellarocas, C., & Zervas, G. (2021). Interacting user-generated content technologies: How questions and answers affect consumer reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(4), 742–761.Google Scholar
Barasch, A., & Berger, J. (2014). Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size affects what people share. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(3), 286–299.Google Scholar
Barasch, A., Zauberman, G., & Diehl, K. (2018). How the intention to share can undermine enjoyment: Photo-taking goals and evaluation of experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1220–1237.Google Scholar
Berger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586–607.Google Scholar
Berger, J., Humphreys, A., Ludwig, S., Moe, W. W., Netzer, O., & Schweidel, D. A. (2020). Uniting the tribes: Using text for marketing insight. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Berger, J., & Iyengar, R. (2013). Communication channels and word of mouth: How the medium shapes the message. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 567–579.Google Scholar
Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral?. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205.Google Scholar
Berger, J., Packard, G., Boghrati, R., Hsu, M., Humphreys, A., Luangrath, A., Moore, S., Nave, G., Olivola, C., & Rocklage, M. (2022). Wisdom from words: marketing insights from text. Marketing Letters, 33, 365–377.Google Scholar
Berger, J., & Schwartz, E. M. (2011). What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 869–880.Google Scholar
Bond, S. D., He, S. X., & Wen, W. (2019). Speaking for “free”: Word of mouth in free- and paid-product settings. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(2), 276–290.Google Scholar
Brannon, D. C., & Samper, A. (2018). Maybe I just got (un)lucky: One-on-one conversations and the malleability of post-consumption product and service evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(4), 810–832.Google Scholar
Casidy, R., Duhachek, A., Singh, V., & Tamaddoni, A. (2021). Religious belief, religious priming, and negative word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(4), 762–781.Google Scholar
Chae, I., Stephen, A. T., Bart, Y., & Yao, D. (2017). Spillover effects in seeding word-of-mouth marketing campaigns. Marketing Science, 36(1), 89–104.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. J., & Kirmani, A. (2015). Posting strategically: The consumer as an online media planner. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(4), 609–621.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. (2017). Social acceptance and word of mouth: How the motive to belong leads to divergent WOM with strangers and friends. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 613–632.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., & Berger, J. (2016). How content acquisition method affects word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 86–102.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., & Yuan, M. (2020). Psychology of word of mouth marketing. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 7–10.Google Scholar
Chevalier, J. A., Dover, Y., & Mayzlin, D. (2018). Channels of impact: User reviews when quality is dynamic and managers respond. Marketing Science, 37(5), 688–709.Google Scholar
Choi, B., & Choi, B. J. (2014). The effects of perceived service recovery justice on customer affection, loyalty, and word-of-mouth. European Journal of Marketing, 48(1/2), 108–131.Google Scholar
Consiglio, I., De Angelis, M., & Costabile, M. (2018). The effect of social density on word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 511–528.Google Scholar
Dai, H., Chan, C., & Mogilner, C. (2020). People rely less on consumer reviews for experiential than material purchases. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(6), 1052–1075.Google Scholar
De Langhe, B., Fernbach, P. M., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (2016). Navigating by the stars: Investigating the actual and perceived validity of online user ratings. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 817–833.Google Scholar
Dichter, E. (1966). How word-of-mouth advertising works. Harvard Business Review, 44, 147–166.Google Scholar
Doh, S. J., & Hwang, J. S. (2009). How consumers evaluate eWOM (electronic word-of-mouth) messages. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 12(2), 193–197.Google Scholar
Dubois, D., Bonezzi, A., & De Angelis, M. (2016). Sharing with friends versus strangers: How interpersonal closeness influences word-of-mouth valence. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 712–727.Google Scholar
Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2016). Dynamics of communicator and audience power: The persuasiveness of competence versus warmth. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(1), 68–85.Google Scholar
Fay, B., Keller, E., & Larkin, R. (2019). How measuring consumer conversations can reveal advertising performance. Journal of Advertising Research, 59(4), 433–439.Google Scholar
Fay, B., Keller, E., Larkin, R., & Pauwels, K. (2019). Deriving value from conversations about your brand. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(2), 72–77.Google Scholar
Feick, L. F., & Price, L. L. (1987). The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 83–97.Google Scholar
Fisher, M., Newman, G. E., & Dhar, R. (2018). Seeing stars: How the binary bias distorts the interpretation of customer ratings. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 471–489.Google Scholar
Floyd, K., Freling, R., Alhoqail, S., Cho, H. Y., & Freling, T. (2014). How online product reviews affect retail sales: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 217–232.Google Scholar
Fossen, B. L., & Schweidel, D. A. (2017). Television advertising and online word-of-mouth: An empirical investigation of social TV activity. Marketing Science, 36(1), 105–123.Google Scholar
Frichou, F. (2020, March 15). 4 Things every business owner should know about the state of reviews. https://uk.business.trustpilot.com/reviews/build-trusted-brand/4-things-every-business-owner-should-know-about-the-state-of-reviewsGoogle Scholar
Godes, D., Mayzlin, D., Chen, Y., et al. (2005). The firm’s management of social interactions. Marketing Letters, 16(3–4), 415–428.Google Scholar
Goode, M. R., Hart, K., & Thomson, M. (2016). Say no more! The liability of strong ties on desire for special experiences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(1), 91–97.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, S. A., & Mafael, A. (2017). Cutting through the online review jungle – Investigating selective eWOM processing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 37, 89–104.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.Google Scholar
Grewal, L., & Stephen, A. T. (2019). In mobile we trust: The effects of mobile versus nonmobile reviews on consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(5), 791–808.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P., & Morgan, J. L. (Eds.). Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hamby, A., Daniloski, K., & Brinberg, D. (2015). How consumer reviews persuade through narratives. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1242–1250.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R., Vohs, K. D., & McGill, A. L. (2014). We’ll be honest, this won’t be the best article you’ll ever read: The use of dispreferred markers in word-of-mouth communication. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 197–212.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. W., Schlosser, A., & Chen, Y. J. (2017). Who’s driving this conversation? Systematic biases in the content of online consumer discussions. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(4), 540–555.Google Scholar
He, D., Melumad, S., & Pham, M. T. (2019). The pleasure of assessing and expressing our likes and dislikes. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 545–563.Google Scholar
He, S. X., & Bond, S. D. (2015). Why is the crowd divided? Attribution for dispersion in online word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1509–1527.Google Scholar
Herhausen, D., Ludwig, S., Grewal, D., Wulf, J., & Schoegel, M. (2019). Detecting, preventing, and mitigating online firestorms in brand communities. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 1–21.Google Scholar
Hinz, O., Skiera, B., Barrot, C., & Becker, J. U. (2011). Seeding strategies for viral marketing: An empirical comparison. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 55–71.Google Scholar
Huang, N., Burtch, G., Hong, Y., & Polman, E. (2016). Effects of multiple psychological distances on construal and consumer evaluation: A field study of online reviews. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 474–482.Google Scholar
Humphreys, A., & Wang, R. J. H. (2018). Automated text analysis for consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1274–1306.Google Scholar
Hydock, C., Chen, Z., & Carlson, K. (2020). Why unhappy customers are unlikely to share their opinions with brands. Journal of Marketing, 86(6), 95–112.Google Scholar
Inman, J. J. (2012). The elephant not in the room: The need for useful, actionable insights in behavioural research. In Gürhan-Canli, Z., Otens, C., & Zhu, R. (Eds.). Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 40 (pp. 1–4). Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication. Free Press.Google Scholar
Keller, E. (2020, July 31). Word-Of-Mouth Remains Vital to Consumers during COVID-19. Media Post, www.mediapost.com/publications/article/354241/word-of-mouth-remains-vital-to-consumers-during-co.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., & Gupta, P. (2012). Emotional expressions in online user reviews: How they influence consumers’ product evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 985–992.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Moore, S. G., & Murray, K. (2021). “Don’t buy” or “do not buy”? How negation style in online reviews influences consumer product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 29(3), 308–322.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word‐of‐mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71–89.Google Scholar
Kronrod, A., & Danziger, S. (2013). “Wii will rock you!” The use and effect of figurative language in consumer reviews of hedonic and utilitarian consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 726–739.Google Scholar
Kupor, D., & Tormala, Z. (2018). When moderation fosters persuasion: The persuasive power of deviatory reviews. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 490–510.Google Scholar
Lafreniere, K. C., Moore, S. G., & Fisher, R. J. (2022). The power of profanity: The meaning and impact of swearwords in word-of-mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(5), 908–925.Google Scholar
Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016). A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile marketing: Research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future inquiry. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 146–172.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, A., Tucker, C., & Wiertz, C. (2018). Advertising to early trend propagators: Evidence from Twitter. Marketing Science, 37(2), 177–199.Google Scholar
Lee, J. K., & Kronrod, A. (2020). The strength of weak-tie consensus language. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(2), 353–374.Google Scholar
Li, X., Shi, M., & Wang, X. S. (2019). Video mining: Measuring visual information using automatic methods. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(2), 216–231.Google Scholar
Li, Y., & Xie, Y. (2020). Is a picture worth a thousand words? An empirical study of image content and social media engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Lisjak, M., Bonezzi, A., & Rucker, D. D. (2021). How marketing perks influence word of mouth. Journal of Marketing, 85(5), 128–144.Google Scholar
Liu, A. X., Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Zhang, J. (2018). Agglomeration as a driver of the volume of electronic word of mouth in the restaurant industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(4), 507–523.Google Scholar
López, M., Sicilia, M., & Verlegh, P. W. (2022). How to motivate opinion leaders to spread e-WoM on social media: Monetary vs non-monetary incentives. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(1), 154–171.Google Scholar
Lovett, M. J., Peres, R., & Shachar, R. (2013). On brands and word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 427–444.Google Scholar
Lovett, M. J., & Staelin, R. (2016). The role of paid, earned, and owned media in building entertainment brands: Reminding, informing, and enhancing enjoyment. Marketing Science, 35(1), 142–157.Google Scholar
Luangrath, A. W., Peck, J., & Barger, V. A. (2017). Textual paralanguage and its implications for marketing communications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 98–107.Google Scholar
Luangrath, A., Xu, Y., & Wang, T. (2022). Paralanguage Classifier (PARA): An algorithm for automatic coding of paralinguistic nonverbal parts of speech in text. Journal of Marketing Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437221116058Google Scholar
Luca, M., & Zervas, G. (2016). Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Science, 62(12), 3412–3427.Google Scholar
Mafael, A. (2019). How regulatory orientation and feelings of gratitude shape online review helpfulness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(4), 601–622.Google Scholar
Mafael, A., Gottschalk, S. A., & Kreis, H. (2016). Examining biased assimilation of brand-related online reviews. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 36, 91–106.Google Scholar
Markovic, S., Iglesias, O., Singh, J, J., & Sierra, V. (2018). How does the perceived ethicality of corporate services brands influence loyalty and positive word-of-mouth? Analyzing the roles of empathy, affective commitment, and perceived quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 721–740.Google Scholar
Melumad, S., Inman, J. J., & Pham, M. T. (2019). Selectively emotional: How smartphone use changes user-generated content. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(2), 259–275.Google Scholar
Melumad, S., Meyer, R., & Kim, Y. D. (2021). The dynamics of distortion: How successive summarization alters the retelling of news. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(6), 1058–1078.Google Scholar
Moe, W. W., & Schweidel, D. A. (2012). Online product opinion: Incidence, evaluation and evolution. Marketing Science, 31(3), 372–386.Google Scholar
Moldovan, S., Steinhart, Y., & Ofen, S. (2015). “Share and scare”: Solving the communication dilemma of early adopters with a high need for uniqueness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Moon, S., & Kamakura, W. A. (2017). A picture is worth a thousand words: Translating product reviews into a product positioning map. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 265–285.Google Scholar
Moore, S. G. (2012). Some things are better left unsaid: How word of mouth influences the storyteller. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1140–1154.Google Scholar
Moore, S. G. (2015). Attitude predictability and helpfulness in online reviews: The role of explained actions and reactions. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 30–44.Google Scholar
Moore, S. G., & Lafreniere, K. C. (2020). How online word-of-mouth impacts receivers. Consumer Psychology Review, 3(1), 34–59.Google Scholar
Moore, S. G., & McFerran, B. (2017). She said, she said: Differential interpersonal similarities predict unique linguistic mimicry in online word of mouth. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 229–245.Google Scholar
Murphy, R. (2018). Local Consumer Review Survey: Online Reviews Statistics & Trends (accessed August 15, 2019). Available at: www.brightlocal.com/research/local-consumer-review-survey/Google Scholar
Nguyen, P., Wang, X., Li, X., & Cotte, J. (2021). Reviewing experts’ restraint from extremes and its impact on service providers. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(5), 654–674.Google Scholar
Oh, H., Animesh, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2016). Free versus for-a-fee: The impact of a paywall on the pattern and effectiveness of word-of-mouth via social media. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 31–56.Google Scholar
Olson, N. J., & Ahluwalia, R. (2021). When sharing isn’t caring: The influence of seeking the best on sharing favorable word of mouth about unsatisfactory purchases. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(6), 1025–1046.Google Scholar
Packard, G., & Berger, J. (2017). How language shapes word of mouth’s impact. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(4), 572–588.Google Scholar
Packard, G., Gershoff, A. D., & Wooten, D. B. (2016). When boastful word of mouth helps versus hurts social perceptions and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(1), 26–43.Google Scholar
Packard, G., & Wooten, D. B. (2013). Compensatory knowledge signaling in consumer word‐of‐mouth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 434–450.Google Scholar
Paley, A., Tully, S. M., & Sharma, E. (2019). Too constrained to converse: The effect of financial constraints on word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 889–905.Google Scholar
Park, S., Shin, W., & Xie, J. (2021). The fateful first consumer review. Marketing Science, 40(3), 481–507.Google Scholar
Perez, S. (2016). Amazon cracks down on fake reviews with another lawsuit. Techcrunch.com, https://techcrunch.com/2016/04/26/amazon-cracks-down-on-fake-reviews-with-another-lawsuit/Google Scholar
Proserpio, D., Troncoso, I., & Valsesia, F. (2021). Does gender matter? The effect of management responses on reviewing behaviour. Marketing Science, 40(6), 1009–1216.Google Scholar
Proserpio, D., & Zervas, G. (2017). Online reputation management: Estimating the impact of management responses on consumer reviews. Marketing Science, 36(5), 645–665.Google Scholar
Puranam, D., Narayan, V., & Kadiyali, V. (2017). The effect of calorie posting regulation on consumer opinion: A flexible latent Dirichlet allocation model with informative priors. Marketing Science, 36(5), 726–746.Google Scholar
Ransbotham, S., Lurie, N. H., & Liu, H. (2019). Creation and consumption of mobile word of mouth: How are mobile reviews different? Marketing Science, 38(5), 773–792.Google Scholar
Reich, B. J., & Pittman, M. (2020). An appeal to intimacy: Consumer response to platform‐appeal fit on social media. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(4), 660–670.Google Scholar
Reich, T., & Maglio, S. J. (2020). Featuring mistakes: The persuasive impact of purchase mistakes in online reviews. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 52–65.Google Scholar
Rocklage, M. D., & Fazio, R. H. (2020). The enhancing versus backfiring effects of positive emotion in consumer reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(2), 332–352.Google Scholar
Rocklage, M. D., & Rucker, D. D. (2019). Text analysis in consumer research: An overview and tutorial. In Kardes, F. R., Herr, P. M., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.).Handbook of Research Methods in Consumer Psychology (pp. 385–402). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Rocklage, M. D., Rucker, D. D., & Nordgren, L. F. (2018). Persuasion, emotion, and language: The intent to persuade transforms language via emotionality. Psychological Science, 29(5), 749–760.Google Scholar
Rocklage, M. D., Rucker, D. D., & Nordgren, L. F. (2021a). Emotionally numb: Expertise dulls consumer experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(3), 355–373.Google Scholar
Rocklage, M. D., Rucker, D. D., & Nordgren, L. F. (2021b). Mass-scale emotionality reveals human behaviour and marketplace success. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 1323–1329.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press.Google Scholar
Ruvio, A., Bagozzi, R. P., Hult, G. T. M., & Spreng, R. (2020). Consumer arrogance and word-of-mouth. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(6), 1116–1137.Google Scholar
Sahoo, N., Dellarocas, C., & Srinivasan, S. (2018). The impact of online product reviews on product returns. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 723–738.Google Scholar
Schram, W. (1955). The Process and Effects of Mass Communication. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Schweidel, D. A., & Moe, W. W. (2014). Listening in on social media: A joint model of sentiment and venue format choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 387–402.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1965). What is a speech act? In Black, M. (Ed.). Philosophy in America (pp. 221–239). Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Shen, H., & Sengupta, J. (2018). Word of mouth versus word of mouse: Speaking about a brand connects you to it more than writing does. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 595–614.Google Scholar
Sheth, J. N. (1971). Word-of-mouth in low risk innovations. Journal of Advertising, 11(June), 15–18.Google Scholar
Shoham, M., Moldovan, S., & Steinhart, Y. (2017). Positively useless: Irrelevant negative information enhances positive impressions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(2), 147–159.Google Scholar
Stephen, A. T. (2016). The role of digital and social media marketing in consumer behaviour. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 17–21.Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Dong, X., & McIntyre, S. (2017). Motivation of user-generated content: Social connectedness moderates the effects of monetary rewards. Marketing Science, 36(3), 329–337.Google Scholar
Teeny, J., Deng, X., & Unnava, R. H. (2020). The “buzz” behind the buzz matters: Energetic and tense arousal as separate motivations for word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(3), 429–446.Google Scholar
Tirunillai, S., & Tellis, G. J. (2012). Does chatter really matter? Dynamics of user-generated content and stock performance. Marketing Science, 31(2), 198–215.Google Scholar
Tirunillai, S., & Tellis, G. J. (2017). Does offline TV advertising affect online chatter? Quasi-experimental analysis using synthetic control. Marketing Science, 36(6), 862–878.Google Scholar
Tuk, M. A., Verlegh, P. W., Smidts, A., & Wigboldus, D. H. (2019). You and I have nothing in common: The role of dissimilarity in interpersonal influence. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 151, 49–60.Google Scholar
Valsesia, F., Proserpio, D., & Nunes, J. C. (2020). The positive effect of not following others on social media. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1152–1168.Google Scholar
Van Laer, T., Edson Escalas, J., Ludwig, S., & van den Hende, E. (2019). What happens in Vegas stays on TripAdvisor? A theory and technique to understand narrativity in consumer reviews. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(2), 267–285.Google Scholar
Van Zant, A. B., & Berger, J. (2020). How the voice persuades. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(4), 661.Google Scholar
Vana, P., & Lambrecht, A. (2021). The effect of individual online reviews on purchase likelihood. Marketing Science, 40(4), 708–730.Google Scholar
Varga, M., & Albuquerque, P. (2019). Measuring the Impact of a Single Negative Consumer Review on Online Search and Purchase Decisions through a Quasi-Natural Experiment. Marketing Science Institute, Research Report 19-103-01.Google Scholar
Vásquez, C. (2014). ‘Usually not one to complain but…’: Constructing identities in user-generated online reviews. In Seargeant, P., & Tagg, C. (Eds.). The Language of Social Media (pp. 65–90). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Villarroel Ordenes, F., Grewal, D., Ludwig, S., Ruyter, K. D., Mahr, D., & Wetzels, M. (2019). Cutting through content clutter: How speech and image acts drive consumer sharing of social media brand messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 988–1012.Google Scholar
Wang, X. S., Lu, S., Li, X. I., Khamitov, M., & Bendle, N. (2021). Audio mining: The role of vocal tone in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(2), 198–211.Google Scholar
Weaver, K., & Hamby, A. (2019). The sounds of silence: Inferences from the absence of word‐of‐mouth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Weber, V., Argo, J., & Moore, S. G. (2019). The impact of feedback on recommendations: What happens when others dislike the recommendation. In Bagchi, R., Block, L., & Lee, L. (Eds.). Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 47 (pp. 286–290). Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
Weingarten, E., & Berger, J. (2017). Fired up for the future: How time shapes sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), 432–447.Google Scholar
Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 258–270.Google Scholar
Whitman, R. (2021, February 22). Engagement Labs, Dstillery Team To Target WOM Influencers. Media Post, www.mediapost.com/publications/article/360797/engagement-labs-dstillery-team-to-target-wom-infl.htmlGoogle Scholar
Woolley, K., & Sharif, M. A. (2021). Incentives increase relative positivity of review content and enjoyment of review writing. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(3), 539–558.Google Scholar
Yazdani, E., Gopinath, S., & Carson, S. (2018). Preaching to the choir: The chasm between top‐ranked reviewers, mainstream customers, and product sales. Marketing Science, 37(5), 838–851.Google Scholar
Yelp. (2022). Fact sheet (accessed September 7, 2022). Available at: www.yelp-press.com/company/fast-facts/default.aspxGoogle Scholar
Yeomans, M. (2019). Some hedonic consequences of perspective‐taking in recommending. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 22–38.Google Scholar
Yin, D., Bond, S. D., & Zhang, H. (2017). Keep your cool or let it out: Nonlinear effects of expressed arousal on perceptions of consumer reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(3), 447–463.Google Scholar
You, Y., Vadakkepatt, G. G., & Joshi, A. M. (2015). A meta-analysis of electronic word-of-mouth elasticity. Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 19–39.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. C. (2021). Communication‐based attribute inference. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(2), 342–349.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Godes, D. (2018). Learning from online social ties. Marketing Science, 37(3), 425–444.Google Scholar
Zhang, M., & Luo, L. (2021). Can Consumer-Posted Photos Serve as a Leading Indicator of Restaurant Survival? Evidence from Yelp. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3108288Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Moe, W. W., & Schweidel, D. A. (2017). Modeling the role of message content and influencers in social media rebroadcasting. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 100–119.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Yang, S., Narayan, V., & Zhao, Y. (2013). Modeling consumer learning from online product reviews. Marketing Science, 32(1), 153–169.Google Scholar

References

Akaka, M. A., Schau, H. J., & Vargo, S. L. (2022). Practice diffusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(6), 939–969.Google Scholar
Alvarez, C., Brick, D. J., & Fournier, S. (2021). Doing relationship work: A theory of change in consumer–brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(4), 610–632.Google Scholar
Arnould, E., Press, M., Salminen, E., & Tillotson, J. S. (2019). Consumer culture theory: Development, critique, application and prospects. Foundations and Trends in Marketing, 12(2), 80–166.Google Scholar
Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868–882.Google Scholar
Arnould, E. J., & Wallendorf, M. (1994). Market-oriented ethnography: Interpretation building and marketing strategy formulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(4), 484–504.Google Scholar
Arsel, Z. (2017). Asking questions with reflexive focus: A tutorial on designing and conducting interviews. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(4), 939–948.Google Scholar
Arsel, Z., & Bean, J. (2013). Taste regimes and market-mediated practice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 899–917.Google Scholar
Arsel, Z., & Thompson, C. J. (2011). Demythologizing consumption practices: How consumers protect their field-dependent identity investments from devaluing marketplace myths. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 791–806.Google Scholar
Bajde, D., & Rojas-Gaviria, P. (2021). Creating responsible subjects: The role of mediated affective encounters. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(3), 492–512.Google Scholar
Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881–898.Google Scholar
Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2017). Liquid consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 582–597.Google Scholar
Bardhi, F., Eckhardt, G. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2012). Liquid relationship to possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 510–529.Google Scholar
Barnhart, M., & Peñaloza, L. (2013). Who are you calling old? Negotiating old age identity in the elderly consumption ensemble. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1133–1153.Google Scholar
Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715–734.Google Scholar
Belk, R., Fischer, E., & Kozinets, R. V. (2012). Qualitative Consumer and Marketing Research. Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500.Google Scholar
Beverland, M. B., Eckhardt, G. M., Sands, S., & Shankar, A. (2021). How brands craft national identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(4), 586–609.Google Scholar
Borgerson, J. L. (2005). Materiality, agency, and the constitution of consuming subjects: Insights for consumer research. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 439–443.Google Scholar
Borghini, S., Sherry, J. F., & Joy, A. (2021). Attachment to and detachment from favorite stores: An affordance theory perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(6), 890–913.Google Scholar
Bradford, T. W., & SherryJr., J. F. (2015). Domesticating public space through ritual: Tailgating as vestaval. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 130–151.Google Scholar
Brown, S., McDonagh, P., & Shultz, C. J. (2013). Titanic: Consuming the myths and meanings of an ambiguous brand. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 595–614.Google Scholar
Brunk, K. H., Giesler, M., & Hartmann, B. J. (2018). Creating a consumable past: How memory making shapes marketization. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1325–1342.Google Scholar
Campbell, C., & Schau, H. J. (2019). Let’s make a “deal”: How deal collectives coproduce unintended value from sales promotions. Journal of Marketing, 83(6), 43–60.Google Scholar
Canniford, R., & Shankar, A. (2013). Purifying practices: How consumers assemble romantic experiences of nature. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 1051–1069.Google Scholar
Carrington, M. J., & Ozanne, J. L. (2022). Becoming through contiguity and lines of flight: The four faces of celebrity-proximate assemblages. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 858–884.Google Scholar
Castilhos, R. B., Dolbec, P. Y., & Veresiu, E. (2017). Introducing a spatial perspective to analyze market dynamics. Marketing Theory, 17(1), 9–29.Google Scholar
Cayla, J., & Arnould, E. J. (2008). A cultural approach to branding in the global marketplace. Journal of international Marketing, 16(4), 86–112.Google Scholar
Cayla, J., & Peñaloza, L. (2012). Mapping the play of organizational identity in foreign market adaptation. Journal of Marketing, 76(6), 38–54.Google Scholar
Chatzidakis, A., Maclaran, P., & Bradshaw, A. (2012). Heterotopian space and the utopics of ethical and green consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 494–515.Google Scholar
Chatzidakis, A., Maclaran, P., & Varman, R. (2021). The regeneration of consumer movement solidarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(2), 289–308.Google Scholar
Collins, P. H. (1990/1999). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge.Google Scholar
Coskuner-Balli, G. (2020). Citizen-consumers wanted: Revitalizing the American dream in the face of economic recessions, 1981–2012. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(3), 327–349.Google Scholar
Coskuner-Balli, G., & Thompson, C. J. (2013). The status costs of subordinate cultural capital: At-home fathers’ collective pursuit of cultural legitimacy through capitalizing consumption practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 19–41.Google Scholar
Crockett, D. (2017). Paths to respectability: Consumption and stigma management in the contemporary black middle class. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 554–581.Google Scholar
Crockett, D. (2022). Racial oppression and racial projects in consumer markets: A racial formation theory approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Cross, S. N., & Gilly, M. C. (2014). Cultural competence and cultural compensatory mechanisms in binational households. Journal of Marketing, 78(3), 121–139.Google Scholar
Dion, D., & Borraz, S. (2017). Managing status: How luxury brands shape class subjectivities in the service encounter. Journal of Marketing, 81(5), 67–85.Google Scholar
Dion, D., Sabri, O., & Guillard, V. (2014). Home sweet messy home: Managing symbolic pollution. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 565–589.Google Scholar
Dolbec, P. Y., Castilhos, R., Fonseca, M. J., & Trez, G. (2022). How established organizations combine logics to reconfigure resources and adapt to marketization: A case study on Brazilian religious schools. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(1), 118–135.Google Scholar
Dolbec, P. Y., & Fischer, E. (2015). Refashioning a field? Connected consumers and institutional dynamics in markets. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1447–1468.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, G. M., Houston, M. B., Jiang, B., Lamberton, C., Rindfleisch, A., & Zervas, G. (2019). Marketing in the sharing economy. Journal of Marketing, 83(5), 5–27.Google Scholar
Eichert, C. A., & Luedicke, M. K. (2022). Almost equal: Consumption under fragmented stigma. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(3), 409–429.Google Scholar
Epp, A. M., & Price, L. L. (2011). Designing solutions around customer network identity goals. Journal of Marketing, 75(2), 36–54.Google Scholar
Epp, A. M., Schau, H. J., & Price, L. L. (2014). The role of brands and mediating technologies in assembling long-distance family practices. Journal of Marketing, 78(3), 81–101.Google Scholar
Epp, A. M., & Thomas, T. C. (2018). Family and collective identity. In Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (Eds.). Consumer Culture Theory (pp. 40–60). Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Epp, A. M., & Velagaleti, S. R. (2014). Outsourcing parenthood? How families manage care assemblages using paid commercial services. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 911–935.Google Scholar
Ertimur, B., & Coskuner-Balli, G. (2015). Navigating the institutional logics of markets: Implications for strategic brand management. Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 40–61.Google Scholar
Feiereisen, S., Rasolofoarison, D., Russell, C. A., & Schau, H. J. (2021). One brand, many trajectories: Narrative navigation in transmedia. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(4), 651–681.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, B., & Scaraboto, D. (2016). The systemic creation of value through circulation in collaborative consumer networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), 509–533.Google Scholar
Fischer, E., & Parmentier, M. A. (2010). Doing qualitative research with archival data: Making secondary data a primary resource. ACR North American Advances.Google Scholar
Franzke, A. S., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., & Ess, C. (2020). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers.Google Scholar
Giesler, M. (2012). How doppelgänger brand images influence the market creation process: Longitudinal insights from the rise of botox cosmetic. Journal of Marketing, 76(6), 55–68.Google Scholar
Giesler, M., & Veresiu, E. (2014). Creating the responsible consumer: Moralistic governance regimes and consumer subjectivity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 840–857.Google Scholar
Godfrey, D. M., Price, L. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2022). Repair, consumption, and sustainability: Fixing fragile objects and maintaining consumer practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(2), 229–251.Google Scholar
Golash-Boza, T. (2016). A critical and comprehensive sociological theory of race and racism. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 2(2), 129–141.Google Scholar
Gollnhofer, J. F., Weijo, H. A., & Schouten, J. W. (2019). Consumer movements and value regimes: Fighting food waste in Germany by building alternative object pathways. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 460–482.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Arcos, C., Joubert, A. M., Scaraboto, D., Guesalaga, R., & Sandberg, J. (2021). “How do I carry all this now?” Understanding consumer resistance to sustainability interventions. Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 44–61.Google Scholar
Gopaldas, A. (2014). Marketplace sentiments. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 995–1014.Google Scholar
Grier, S. A., Thomas, K. D., & Johnson, G. D. (2019). Re-imagining the marketplace: Addressing race in academic marketing research. Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(1), 91–100.Google Scholar
Henry, P., & Caldwell, M. (2018). Social class. In Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (Eds.). Consumer Culture Theory (pp. 153–179). Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Higgins, L., & Hamilton, K. (2019). Therapeutic servicescapes and market-mediated performances of emotional suffering. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(6), 1230–1253.Google Scholar
Hill, T., Canniford, R., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2022). The roar of the crowd: How interaction ritual chains create social atmospheres. Journal of Marketing, 86(3), 121–139.Google Scholar
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2018). Consumer and object experience in the internet of things: An assemblage theory approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1178–1204.Google Scholar
Huff, D. A., Humphreys, A., & Wilner, S. J. (2021). The politicization of objects: Meaning and materiality in the US cannabis market. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(1), 22–50.Google Scholar
Humphreys, A., & Carpenter, G. S. (2018). Status games: Market driving through social influence in the US wine industry. Journal of Marketing, 82(5), 141–159.Google Scholar
Humphreys, A., & Thompson, C. J. (2014). Branding disaster: Reestablishing trust through the ideological containment of systemic risk anxieties. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 877–910.Google Scholar
Husemann, K. C., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2019). Consumer deceleration. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(6), 1142–1163.Google Scholar
Izberk-Bilgin, E. (2012). Infidel brands: Unveiling alternative meanings of global brands at the nexus of globalization, consumer culture, and Islamism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 663–687.Google Scholar
Karababa, E., & Ger, G. (2011). Early modern Ottoman coffeehouse culture and the formation of the consumer subject. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 737–760.Google Scholar
Keller, K. L. (2002). Branding and brand equity. In Weitz, B., & Wensley, R. (Eds.). Handbook of Marketing (pp. 151–178). Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Keller, K. L. (2020). Consumer research insights on brands and branding: A JCR curation. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(5), 995–100.Google Scholar
Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61–69.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V. (2008). Technology/ideology: How ideological fields influence consumers’ technology narratives. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 865–881.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V. (2019). Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research. Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V., Ferreira, D. A., & Chimenti, P. (2021). How do platforms empower consumers? Insights from the affordances and constraints of reclame aqui. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(3), 428–455.Google Scholar
Kozinets, R., Patterson, A., & Ashman, R. (2017). Networks of desire: How technology increases our passion to consume. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 659–682.Google Scholar
Kravets, O., & Sandikci, O. (2014). Competently ordinary: New middle class consumers in the emerging markets. Journal of Marketing, 78(4), 125–140.Google Scholar
Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016). A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile marketing: Research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future inquiry. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 146–172.Google Scholar
Liu, C., & Kozinets, R. V. (2022). Courtesy stigma management: Social identity work among China’s “leftover women.” Journal of Consumer Research, 49(2), 312–335.Google Scholar
Luedicke, M. K. (2015). Indigenes’ responses to immigrants’ consumer acculturation: A relational configuration analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 109–129.Google Scholar
Maclaran, P., & Stevens, L. (2019). Thinking through feminist theorising: Poststructuralist feminism, ecofeminism and intersectionality. In Doscha, S. (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Gender and Marketing (pp. 229–251). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Maciel, A. F., & Fischer, E. (2020). Collaborative market driving: How peer firms can develop markets through collective action. Journal of Marketing, 84(5), 41–59.Google Scholar
MacInnis, D. J., & Folkes, V. S. (2010). The disciplinary status of consumer behavior: A sociology of science perspective on key controversies. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 899–914.Google Scholar
Maciel, A. F., & Wallendorf, M. (2017). Taste engineering: An extended consumer model of cultural competence constitution. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 726–746.Google Scholar
Maciel, A. F., & Wallendorf, M. (2021). Space as a resource in the politics of consumer identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(2), 309–332.Google Scholar
Mamali, E. (2019). Researcher’s guilt: Confessions from the darker side of ethnographic consumer research. Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(3), 241–255.Google Scholar
Marcoux, J. S. (2017). Souvenirs to forget. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 950–969.Google Scholar
Martin, D. M., & Schouten, J. W. (2014). Consumption-driven market emergence. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 855–870.Google Scholar
McAlexander, J. H., Dufault, B. L., Martin, D. M., & Schouten, J. W. (2014). The marketization of religion: Field, capital, and consumer identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 858–875.Google Scholar
Mick, D. G., & Fournier, S. (1998). Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 123–143.Google Scholar
Mimoun, L., & Bardhi, F. (2021). Chronic consumer liminality: Being flexible in precarious times. Journal of Consumer Research, ucab073.Google Scholar
Mimoun, L., Trujillo-Torres, L., & Sobande, F. (2022). Social emotions and the legitimation of the fertility technology market. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(6), 1073–1095.Google Scholar
Moisio, R., Arnould, E. J., & Gentry, J. W. (2013). Productive consumption in the classmediated construction of domestic masculinity: Do-it-yourself (DIY) home improvement in men’s identity work. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 298–316.Google Scholar
Parmentier, M. A., & Fischer, E. (2015). Things fall apart: The dynamics of brand audience dissipation. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(5), 1228–1251.Google Scholar
Parmentier, M. A., & Fischer, E. (2021). Working it: Managing professional brands in prestigious posts. Journal of Marketing, 85(2), 110–128.Google Scholar
Perren, R., & Kozinets, R. V. (2018). Lateral exchange markets: How social platforms operate in a networked economy. Journal of Marketing, 82(1), 20–36.Google Scholar
Puntoni, S., Reczek, R. W., Giesler, M., & Botti, S. (2021). Consumers and artificial intelligence: An experiential perspective. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 131–151.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. D., Veresiu, E., & Babić Rosario, A. (2022). Consumer timework. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(1), 96–111.Google Scholar
Roux, D., & Belk, R. (2019). The body as (another) place: Producing embodied heterotopias through tattooing. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 483–507.Google Scholar
Russell, C. A., & Levy, S. J. (2012). The temporal and focal dynamics of volitional reconsumption: A phenomenological investigation of repeated hedonic experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 341–359.Google Scholar
Russell, C. A., & Schau, H. J. (2014). When narrative brands end: The impact of narrative closure and consumption sociality on loss accommodation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1039–1062.Google Scholar
Saatcioglu, B., & Ozanne, J. L. (2013). Moral habitus and status negotiation in a marginalized working-class neighborhood. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 692–710.Google Scholar
Sassatelli, R. (2007). Consumer Culture: History, Theory and Politics. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., et al. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907.Google Scholar
Scaraboto, D. (2015). Selling, sharing, and everything in between: The hybrid economies of collaborative networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 152–176.Google Scholar
Scaraboto, D., & Figueiredo, B. (2021). How consumer orchestration work creates value in the sharing economy. Journal of Marketing, 86(2), 29–47.Google Scholar
Scaraboto, D., & Fischer, E. (2013). Frustrated fatshionistas: An institutional theory perspective on consumer quests for greater choice in mainstream markets. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1234–1257.Google Scholar
Schau, H. J. (2018). Identity projects and the marketplace. In Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (Eds.). Consumer Culture Theory (pp. 19–39). Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Schmitt, B. (2012). The consumer psychology of brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 7–17.Google Scholar
Scott, R., Cayla, J., & Cova, B. (2017). Selling pain to the saturated self. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 22–43.Google Scholar
Seregina, A., & Weijo, H. A. (2017). Play at any cost: How cosplayers produce and sustain their ludic communal consumption experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 139–159.Google Scholar
Shankar, A., & Patterson, M. (2001). Interpreting the past, writing the future. Journal of Marketing Management, 17(5–6), 481–501.Google Scholar
Siebert, A., Gopaldas, A., Lindridge, A., & Simoes, C. (2020). Customer experience journeys: loyalty loops versus involvement spirals. Journal of Marketing, 84(4), 45–66.Google Scholar
Tan, T., & Ming, M. (2003). Leveraging on symbolic values and meanings in branding. Journal of brand Management, 10(3), 208–218.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. D., Cross, S. N. N., & HarrisonIII, R. L. (2018). Race and ethnicity. In Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (Eds.). Consumer Culture Theory (pp. 206–224). Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Thomas, T. C., & Epp, A. M. (2019). The best laid plans: Why new parents fail to habituate practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 564–589.Google Scholar
Thomas, T. C., Price, L. L., & Schau, H. J. (2013). When differences unite: Resource dependence in heterogeneous consumption communities. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 1010–1033.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. J., Henry, P. C., & Bardhi, F. (2018). Theorizing reactive reflexivity: Lifestyle displacement and discordant performances of taste. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 571–594.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. J., & Üstüner, T. (2015). Women skating on the edge: Marketplace performances as ideological edgework. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 235–265.Google Scholar
Tian, K., Sautter, P., Fisher, D., et al. (2014). Transforming health care: Empowering therapeutic communities through technology-enhanced narratives. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 237–260.Google Scholar
Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016). Social media research: A guide to ethics. University of Aberdeen, 1, 16.Google Scholar
Tumbat, G., & Belk, R. W. (2011). Marketplace tensions in extraordinary experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 42–61.Google Scholar
Türe, M., & Ger, G. (2016). Continuity through change: Navigating temporalities through heirloom rejuvenation. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Üstüner, T., & Thompson, C. J. (2012). How marketplace performances produce interdependent status games and contested forms of symbolic capital. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 796–814.Google Scholar
Valor, C., Lloveras, J., & Papaoikonomou, E. (2021). The role of emotion discourse and pathic stigma in the delegitimization of consumer practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(5), 636–653.Google Scholar
Veresiu, E., & Giesler, M. (2018). Beyond acculturation: Multiculturalism and the institutional shaping of an ethnic consumer subject. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 553–570.Google Scholar
Visconti, L. M., Maclaran, P., & Bettany, S. (2018). Gender(s), consumption, and markets. In Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (Eds.). Consumer Culture Theory (pp. 180–205). Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Weijo, H. A., Martin, D. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2018). Consumer movements and collective creativity: The case of Restaurant Day. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), 251–274.Google Scholar
Weinberger, M. F. (2015). Dominant consumption rituals and intragroup boundary work: How non-celebrants manage conflicting relational and identity goals. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(3), 378–400.Google Scholar
Weinberger, M. F., & Crockett, D. (2018). Critical reflections on consumer identity. In Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (Eds.). Consumer Culture Theory (pp. 62–84). Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Weinberger, M. F., & Wallendorf, M. (2012). Intracommunity gifting at the intersection of contemporary moral and market economies. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 74–92.Google Scholar
Weinberger, M. F., Zavisca, J. R., & Silva, J. M. (2017). Consuming for an imagined future: Middle-class consumer lifestyle and exploratory experiences in the transition to adulthood. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), 332–360.Google Scholar
Wieser, V. E., Luedicke, M. K., & Hemetsberger, A. (2021). Charismatic entrainment: How brand leaders and consumers co-create charismatic authority in the marketplace. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(4), 731–751.Google Scholar
Woermann, N., & Rokka, J. (2015). Timeflow: How consumption practices shape consumers’ temporal experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1486–1508.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×