Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-xc2pj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-31T15:02:07.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Representation

from Part II - Modalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2025

Richard Bellamy
Affiliation:
University College London
Jeff King
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

In democracies based on elections, representation brings a novel kind of freedom to the fore, one that does not need to be associated with the citizen’s direct action or presence in the place where decisions are made, as is the case in direct democracy. It enlarges the space and meaning of politics in ways that cannot easily be reduced to electoral authorization and consent, and it invariably connects with both the lawmaking institution and the citizens’ voluntary participation, their equal right to define the political direction of their country but also claim, vindicate, and monitor their representatives. This chapter analyzes “political representation” in its actors, components and processes and compared it to other forms (as statistical sample and embodiment) and finally discusses the implications of the mixture of representation and democracy in contemporary politics.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Ankersmit, F. (2002). Political Representation, Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito Vieira, M. & Runciman, D. (2008). Representation, London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Disch, L., de Sande, M., Urbinati, U., eds. (2019). The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation, Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.Google Scholar
Gerbaudo, P. (2019). The Digital Party: Political Organization and Online Democracy, London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., Jay, J., Madison, J. (1987 [1787]). The Federalist. A Commentary on The Constitution of the United States, Edited Earl, E. M., New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1992). Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory: A Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1999 [1945]). General Theory of Law and State, Translated by A. Wedberg, Union, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (2013 [1929]). The Essence and Value of Democracy, Edited by Urbinati, N. and Accetti, C. Invernizzi, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking Representation. American Political Science Review, 97 (4), 515528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, H. F. (2004). Representation and Democracy: Uneasy Alliance. Scandinavian Political Studies, 27 (2004), 335342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotke, D. (1997). Representation is Democracy. Constellations, 4 (1), 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saward, M. (2010). The Representative Claim, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sintomer, Y. (2013). The Meanings of Political Representation: Uses and Misuses of a Notion. Raisons Politiques, 50 (2), 1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2006). Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy, London and Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2014). Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth and The People, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, N. & Warren, M. (2008). The concept of Representation in Contemporary Political Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11 (1), 387412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (1999). Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Representation
  • Edited by Richard Bellamy, University College London, Jeff King, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
  • Online publication: 27 March 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868143.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Representation
  • Edited by Richard Bellamy, University College London, Jeff King, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
  • Online publication: 27 March 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868143.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Representation
  • Edited by Richard Bellamy, University College London, Jeff King, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
  • Online publication: 27 March 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868143.017
Available formats
×