Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-bmd9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-07T22:37:34.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2025

Richard Bellamy
Affiliation:
University College London
Jeff King
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Dyson, K. (2009). The State Tradition in Western Europe. A Study of an Idea and Institution, 2nd edn., Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, B. (2019). The Public’s Law: Origins and Architecture of Progressive Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D. (1986). The Modern State: Continental Traditions. In Kaufmann, F.-X., Majone, G., and Ostrom, V., eds., Guidance, Control, and Evaluation in the Public Sector. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 89109.Google Scholar
Jellinek, G. (1914). Allgemeine Staatslehre, 3rd edn., Berlin: O. Häring.Google Scholar
Levy, J. D., Leibfried, S., & Nullmeier, F. (2015). Changing Perspectives on the State. In Leibfried, S., Huber, E. and Lange, M. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3358.Google Scholar
Loughlin, M. (2022). Against Constitutionalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McLean, J. (2012). Searching for the State in British Legal Thought. Competing Conceptions of the Public Sphere, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möllers, C. (2011b). Staat als Argument, 2nd edn, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Poggi, G. (1990). The State. Its Nature, Development and Prospects, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2009). A Genealogy of the Modern State, Proceedings of the British Academy, 162, pp. 325370.Google Scholar
Troper, M. (1994). Pour une théorie juridique de l’Etat, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Ackerman, B. (1998). We the People: Transformations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beaud, O. (1994). La Puissance de l’État, Paris: PUF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colón-Ríos, J. (2020). Constituent Power and Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldoni, M., & Wilkinson, M. (2018). The Material Constitution. Modern Law Review, 81 (4), 567597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassalle, F. (1942). On the Essence of Constitutions. Marxist Archive. Available from: www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/fi/vol03/no01/lassalle.htm.Google Scholar
Lindahl, H. (2013). Fault Lines of Globalisation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M. (2010). Foundations of Public Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortati, C. (2025). The Constitution in the Material Sense, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neves, M. (2013). Transconstitutionalism, Hart: Oxford.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, N. (2000). State, Power, Socialism, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Romano, S. (2017). The Legal Order, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2008). Constitutional Theory, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (2012). Constitutional Fragments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, C. (2011). A Sociology of Constitutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Althusius, J. (1995 [1603]). Politica Methodice Digesta, Atque Exemplis Sacris et Profanis Illustrata. Edited and translated by Carney, Frederick S.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Aroney, N. (2019). The Federal Condition. In Lev, Amnon, ed., The Federal Idea: Public Law between Governance and Political Life. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 2951Google Scholar
Burgess, M. (2012). In Search of the Federal Spirit: New Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives in Comparative Federalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, D., ed. (1994). Federal Systems of the World: A Handbook of Federal, Confederal and Autonomy Arrangements, 2nd edn, Harlow: Longmans.Google Scholar
Gagnon, A-G. & Tully, J., eds. (2001). Multinational Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., Madison, J, & Jay, J. (1961). The Federalist Papers. Edited by Rossiter, Clinton. New York: New American Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hueglin, T. O. & Fenna, A. (2015). Comparative federalism: A Systematic Enquiry, 2nd edn, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Karmis, D. & Norman, W., eds (2005). Theories of Federalism, New York: Palgrave-Macmillan Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaCroix, A. (2011). The Ideological Origins of American Federalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, S. R. (2021). The Constitutional Theory of the Federation and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev, A., ed. (2019). The Federal Idea: Public Law between Governance and Political Life, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 126Google Scholar
Palermo, F. & Kössler, K. (2017). Comparative Federalism: Constitutional Arrangements and Case Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Tierney, S. (2004). Constitutional Law and National Pluralism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, R. L. (2008). Comparing Federal Systems, 3rd edn, Kingston/Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Wheare, K. C. (1946). Federal Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bogaards, M. & Ludger, H. (2020). Half a Century of Consociationalism – Cases and Comparisons. Special Issue of Swiss Political Science Review, 25 (4): 341574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks Kelly, B. (2019). Power-Sharing and Consociational Theory, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Horowitz, D. L. (1991). A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakala, M., Kuzu, D., & Qvortrup, M., eds. (2018). Consociationalism and Power-Sharing in Europe. Arend Lijphart’s Theory of Political Accommodation, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lacey, J. (2017). Centripetal Democracy: Democratic Legitimacy and Political Identity in Belgium, Switzerland and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (2008). Introduction: Developments in power-sharing theory. In Lijphart, Arend (ed.) Thinking about Democracy: Power-Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge, 322.Google Scholar
Reilly, B. (2001). Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Canning, J. P. (1980). The Corporation in the Political Thought of the Italian Jurists of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries. History of Political Thought, 1 (1), 932.Google Scholar
Cole, G. D. H. (2011 [1920]). Guild Socialism Restated. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1997 [1893]). The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by W. D. Hall. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (2018). Professional Ethics and Civic Morals, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gierke, O. (1900). The Political Theories of Middle Ages. Translated by Frederic William Maitland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (2019 [1889]). The Social Role of Private Law. (Translated by Ewan McGaughey). German Law Journal 19 (4), 10171116.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1992 [1962]). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991 [1821]). Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Edited by Wood, Allen W.. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, P. Q., ed. (1989). The Pluralist Theory of the State: Selected Writings of G. D. H. Cole, J. N. Figgis, and H. J. Laski, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laborde, C. (2000). Pluralist Thought and the State in Britain and France, 1900–25, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Molina, O. & Rhodes, M. (2002). Corporatism: The Past, Present, and Future of a Concept. Annual Review of Political Science, 5 (1), 305331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, A. C., ed. (2017). Corporatism and Fascism: The Corporatist Wave in Europe, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runciman, D. (1997). Pluralism and the Personality of the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, P. (1974). Still the Century of Corporatism? Review of Politics, 36 (1), 85131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Ackerman, B. (2000). The New Separation of Powers. Harvard Law Review, 113 (3), 633729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, M. A. (2023). Between Trust and Democracy: The Election Commission of India and the Question of Constitutional Accountability. In Jhaveri, S., Khaitan, T. and Samararatne, D., eds, Constitutional Resilience Beyond Courts: Views from South Asia. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Brown, A. J. (2014). The Integrity Branch: A ‘System’, An ‘Industry’, Or a Sensible Emerging Fourth Arm of Government? In Groves, M., ed., Modern Administrative Law in Australia: Concepts and Context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 301325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, B. (2019). Independent Regulatory and Oversight (Fourth Branch) Institutions. IDEA. Available at: www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/independent-regulatory-and-oversight-fourth-branch-institutions (Accessed: 4 January 2022).Google Scholar
Federal Data Protection Act (2017). (Germany).Google Scholar
Fombad, C. M. (2018). The Diffusion of South African-Style Institutions? A Study in Comparative Constitutionalism. In Dixon, R. and Roux, T., eds, Constitutional Triumphs, Constitutional Disappointments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 359387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaitan, T. (2021). Guarantor Institutions. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 16 (S1), S40S59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, H. (2019). Transformative Constitutions and the Role of Integrity Institutions in Tempering Power: The Case of Resistance to State Capture in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Buffalo Law Review, 67 (3), 701742.Google Scholar
Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act (2013) (India).Google Scholar
Pal, M. (2023). The South Asian Fourth Branch. In Jhaveri, S., Khaitan, T. and Samararatne, D., eds, Constitutional Resilience Beyond Courts: Views from South Asia. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Right to Information Act (2005). (India).Google Scholar
Samararatne, D. (2023). Sri Lanka’s Guarantor Branch. In Jhaveri, S., Khaitan, T. and Samararatne, D., eds, Constitutional Resilience Beyond Courts: Views from South Asia. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
The Electoral Commission Act (1996) (South Africa).Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2021). The New Fourth Branch: Institutions for Protecting Constitutional Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Adolph, C. (2013). Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics: The Myth of Neutrality, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baradaran, M. (2017). The Color of Money: Black Banks and the Racial Wealth Gap, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, W. (2020). Public Finance and Parliamentary Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernanke, B., Laubach, T., Mishkin, F., & Posen, A. (2001). Inflation targeting: Lessons from the international experience, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Braun, B., & Downey, L. (2020). Against Amnesia: Re-Imagining Central Banking (Discussion Note No. 2020/01). Zürich: Council on Economic Policies.Google Scholar
Bunn, P., Pugh, A, & Yeates, C. (2018). “The Distributional Impact of Monetary Policy Easing in the UK between 2008 and 2014.” Staff Working Papers. Bank of England, March 27.Google Scholar
Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., Kueng, L., & Silvia, J. (2017). Innocent Bystanders? Monetary policy and inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics, 88, 7089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti-Brown, P. (2016). The Power and Independence of the Federal Reserve, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desan, C. (2014). Making Money: Coin, Currency, and the Coming of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietsch, P., Claveau, F., & Fontan, C. (2018). Do Central Banks Serve the People? Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1962). Should there be an independent monetary authority? In Yeager, L., ed., In Search of a Monetary Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 219243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, R., & Omarova, S. (2017). The Finance Franchise. Cornell Law Review, 102 (5), 1143.Google Scholar
Mehrling, P. (2010). The New Lombard Street: How the Fed Became the Dealer of Last Resort, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Monnet, E. (2021). La Banque Providence: Démocratiser les banques centrales et la monnaie, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Pistor, K. (2013). A Legal Theory of Finance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41 (2), 315330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, P. (2018). Unelected Power: The Quest for Legitimacy in Central Banking and the Regulatory State, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Ackerman, B. (2000). The New Separation of Powers. Harvard Law Review, 113 (3), 633729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, J. A. (2006). Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constitutional Reform Committee (1992[1848]). Report on the 1848 Draft Constitution of Switzerland. In Lijphart, Arend ed., Parliamentary versus Presidential Government. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 173174.Google Scholar
Elgie, R. (2011). Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-Types and Democratic Performance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (2008 [1787/88]). The Federalist Papers. Edited by L. Goldman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Khaitan, T. (2021). Balancing Accountability and Effectiveness: A Case for Moderated Parliamentarism. Canadian Journal of Comparative and Contemporary Law, 7 (1) 81–155.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A., ed. (1992). Parliamentary versus Presidential Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, J., & Valenzuela, A., eds. (1994). The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, D., & Shugart, M. (2010). Presidents, Parties, and Prime MinistersHow the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shugart, M., & Carey, J. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies. Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strøm, K., Müller, W., & Bergman, T., eds. (2003). Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tavits, M. (2009), Presidents with Prime Ministers. Do Direct Elections Matter? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Blackstone, W. (1979). Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol. I. Edited by Katz, S.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, London: VersoGoogle Scholar
Dicey, A. V. (2013). The Law of the Constitution. Edited by Allison, J. W. F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fatovic, C. (2009). Outside the Law: Emergency and Executive Power, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (2017). The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1988). Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Laslett, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, H. (1989). Taming the Prince: The Ambivalence of Modern Executive Power, New York: Free Press; London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Meinecke, F. (1957). Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d’État and Its Place in Modern History. Translated by D. Scott. Introduction by W. Stark. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Naudé, G. (2020). Political Considerations upon Refin’d Politicks, and the Master-Strokes of State. Translated by W. King. Edited by Watson, K.. Independently published.Google Scholar
Plato, (1992). Statesman. Translated by J. B. Skemp. Edited by Ostwald, M.. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Poole, T. (2015). Reason of State: Law, Prerogative and Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1985). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by G Schwab. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Emerson, B. (2019). The Public’s Law: Origins and Architecture of Progressive Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, D. R. (2014). Tocqueville’s Nightmare: The Administrative State Emerges in America, 1914–1940, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, E. (2001). Presidential Administration. Harvard Law Review, 114(8), 22452385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. Z. (2010). Race, Sex, and Rulemaking: Administrative Constitutionalism and the Workplace, 1960 to the Present. Virginia Law Review, 96(4), 799886.Google Scholar
Mashaw, J. L. (2012). Creating the Administrative Constitution: The Lost One Hundred Years of American Administrative Law, New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Michaels, J. D. (2018). Constitutional Coup: Privatization’s Threat to the American Republic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rahman, K. S. (2016). Democracy Against Domination, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (2021). Democracy and Executive Power: Policymaking Accountability in the US, the UK, Germany, and France, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, W. E. (1994). Between the Norm and the Exception: The Frankfurt School and the Rule of Law, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, S., Dearborn, J. A., & King, D. (2021). Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic: The Deep State and the Unitary Executive, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Broeksteeg, H., Verhey, L., & Van den Driessche, I., eds. (2008). Political Accountability in Europe: Which Way Forward? Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
Carpenter, D. & Moss, D. A. eds. (2014). Preventing Regulatory Capture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eifert, M. (2014). Conceptualizing Administrative Law–Legal Protection Versus Regulatory Approach. In Pünder, H. and Waldhoff, C., eds., Debates in German Public Law. Oxford: Hart, pp. 203218.Google Scholar
Harlow, C. (2002). Accountability in the European Union. In Alston, P. and de Witte, B., eds., Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, E. (2001). Presidential Administration. Harvard Law Review, 114 (8), 22452319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashaw, J. L. (2018). Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. (1987). Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 3 (2), 243277.Google Scholar
Nicholas, B. (1970). Loi, Règlement and Judicial Review in the Fifth Republic. Public Law, 1970, 251276.Google Scholar
Reitz, J. C. (2006). Political Economy and Separation of Powers. Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, 15 (2), 579625.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (2021). Democracy and Executive Power: Policymaking Accountability in the US, the UK, Germany, and France, New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., Egidy, S. & Fowkes, J. (2015). Due Process of Lawmaking: The United States, South Africa, Germany, and the European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., Lindseth, P., & Emerson, B., eds. (2017). Comparative Administrative Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 284301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. & Perroud, T. (2014). Policymaking and Public Law in France: Public Participation, Agency Independence, and Impact Assessment. The Columbia Journal of European Law, 19 (2), 225312.Google Scholar
Ruffert, M., ed., (2007). The Transformation of Administrative Law in Europe, Munich: Sellier.Google Scholar
Shane, P. M. (2009). Madison’s Nightmare: How Executive Power Threatens American Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, P. L. (2007). Overseer or “the Decider”? The President in Administrative Law. George Washington Law Review, 75 (4), 696760.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Arato, A. (2016). Post Sovereign Constitution Making, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, A. (2017). Adventures of the Constituent Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (2006). Legislatures as Constituent Assemblies. In Bauman, R. and Kahana, T., eds., The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J., Gargarella, R., Naresh, V., Rasch, B. E., eds. (2018). Constituent Assemblies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghai, Y. (2012). The Role of Constituent Assemblies in Constitution Making. International IDEA. https://constitutionnet.org/vl/item/role-constituent-assemblies-constitution-making-yash-ghai-international-idea-2012Google Scholar
Hoar, R. S. (2004). Constitutional Conventions: Their Nature, Powers and Limitations, Kessinger Publishing.Google Scholar
Jameson, J. A. (1887). A Treatise on Constitutional Conventions: Their History, Powers, and Modes of Proceeding, Chicago: Callaghan and Co.Google Scholar
Kruman, M. (1997). Between Authority and Liberty: State Constitution Making in Revolutionary America, Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Landau, D. & Lerner, H. (2019). Comparative Constitution-Making, Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. (2006). Our Undemocratic Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M. (2007). Constituent Power Subverted: From English Constitutional Argument to British Constitutional Practice. In Loughlin, M. and Walker, N., eds., The Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 2748.Google Scholar
Negretto, G., ed. (2020). Redrafting Constitutions in Democratic Regimes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2008). Constitutional Theory, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sieyès, E. (2003). Political Writings, Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2015). Peasants with Pitchforks, and Toilers with Twitter: Constitutional Revolutions and the Constituent Power. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13 (3), 639654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bauböck, R. (2006). Migration and Citizenship: Legal Status Rights, and Political Participation, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2008). Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, S. (2004). The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carens, J. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, N. M. (2019). American While Black: African Americans, Immigration, and the Limits of Citizenship, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, E. F. (2009). Semi-Citizenship in Democratic Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, E. F. & Ghosh, C. (2019). Citizenship (Key Concepts in Political Theory), Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Cooper, F. (2018). Citizenship, Inequality, and Difference: Historical Perspectives, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Donald, A. (2016). Immigration points-based systems compared. The British Broadcasting Service [online]. 1 June. [Viewed 19 August 2018]. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20180819133654/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-29594642.Google Scholar
Isin, E. F. & Turner, B. S., eds. (2002). Handbook of Citizenship Studies, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, C. (2010). Citizenship and Immigration, Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kingston, L. N. (2019). Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, R. (2003). Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, 2nd edn, New York: NYU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lori, N. (2019). Offshore Citizens: Permanent Temporary Status in the Gulf, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamdani, M. (2018). Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shachar, A. et al., eds. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, Oxford: Oxford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Achen, C. & Bartels, L. (2016). Democracy for Realists. Why Elections do not Produce Responsive Government, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, J. & Hill, L. (2014). Compulsory Voting, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, M. (1984). Voting Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1997). Principles of Electoral Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastil, J. & Olin Wright, E., eds. (2019). Legislature by Lot, London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Lafont, C. (2020). Democracy without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. (2020). Open Democracy. Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lopez-Guerra, C. (2014). Democracy and Disenfranchisement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maskikver, J. (2020). The Duty to Vote, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, J. (2020). Let the People Rule. How Direct Democracy Can Meet the Populist Challenge, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCall Rosenbluth, F. & Shapiro, S. (2018). Responsible Parties. Saving Democracy from Itself, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (2018). Why Bother with Elections? Cambridge, UK; Medford, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Strangers in their Own Land. (2016). Anger and Mourning on the American Right, New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. (2002). Just Elections. Creating a Fair Electoral Process in the United States, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Biezen, I. & Saward, M. (2008). Democratic Theorists and Party Scholars: Why They Don’t Talk to Each Other, and Why They Should. Perspectives on Politics, 6 (1), 2135.Google Scholar
Bonotti, M. (2017). Partisanship and Political Liberalism in Diverse Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, L. (2017). Democratic Partisanship: From Theoretical Ideal to Empirical Standard. American Political Science Review, 111 (4), 738754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Invernizzi Accetti, C. & Wolkenstein, F. (2017). The crisis of party democracy, cognitive mobilization and the case for making parties more deliberative. American Political Science Review, 111 (1), 97109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. (2013). The Essence and Value of Democracy. Edited by Urbinati, N. and Invernizzi-Accetti, C.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Muirhead, R. (2006). A Defence of Party Spirit. Perspectives on Politics, 4 (4), 713727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead, R. (2014). The Promise of Party in a Polarized Age, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead, R. & Rosenblum, N. (2020). The Political Theory of Parties and Partisanship: Catching Up. Annual Review of Political Science, 23 (1), 95110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblum, N. (2008). On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1942). Party Government, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
White, J. & Ypi, L. (2016). The Meaning of Partisanship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolkenstein, F. (2019). Rethinking Party Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bauman, R. & Kahana, T. eds. (2006). The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekins, R. (2012). The Nature of Legislative Intent, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, D., ed. (2013). Law in Politics, Politics in Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, J. (2010). Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilbert, C. (1901). Legislative Methods and Forms, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1865). Considerations on Representative Government, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Norton, P. ed. (1990). Legislatures, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nourse, V. (2016). Misreading Law, Misreading Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (1999a). Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, G., Yowell, P, & Ekins, R. et al. (2018). Legislated Rights: Securing Human Rights through Legislation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wintgens, L. ed (2005). The Theory and Practice of Legislation: Essays in Legisprudence, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Yowell, P. (2018). Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design: Moral and Empirical Reasoning in Judicial Review, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Albert, R. & Stacey, R. eds. (2022). The Limits and Legitimacy of Referendums, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baume, S., Boillet, V., & Martenet, V., eds. (2021). Misinformation in Referenda, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2023). Political Constitutionalism and Referendums: The Case of Brexit. Social & Legal Studies. 32 (6), 973–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, L. (2012). Campaign Strategy in Direct Democracy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carolan, E. (2020). Constitutional Change Outside the Courts: Citizen Deliberation and Constitutional Narrative(s) in Ireland’s Abortion Referendum. Federal Law Review, 48 (4), 497510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cetra, D., Casanas-Adam, E., & Tarrega, M. (2018). The 2017 Catalan Independence Referendum: A Symposium. Scottish Affairs, 27 (1), 126143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, S. B. (2009). Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. (2019). The Democratic Case for a Written Constitution. Current Legal Problems, 72 (1), 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, L. (2015). Referendums and Deliberative Democracy. Electoral Studies, 38, 139148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, J. (2020). Let the People Rule: How Direct Democracy Can Meet the Populist Challenge, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moeckli, D. (2011). Of Minarets and Foreign Criminals: Swiss Direct Democracy and Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 11 (4), 774794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, L. & Qvortrup, M., eds. (2017). The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, J. (2020). The Roles of Referendums in Deliberative Systems. Representation: Journal of Representative Democracy, 56 (4), 485500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suteu, S. & Tierney, S. (2018). Squaring the Circle? Bringing Deliberation and Participation Together in Processes of Constitution-Making. In Levy, R. et al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 282294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiss Political Science Review (2018) Debate: Do Referendums Enhance or Threaten Democracy? Swiss Political Science Review, 24 (3), 291358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, S. (2012). Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Crosby, N. & Nethercut, D. (2005). Citizen Juries: Creating a Trustworthy Voice of the People. In Gastil, J., and Levine, P., eds., The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 111119.Google Scholar
Dienel, P. C. & Ortwin, R. (1995). Planning Cells: A Gate to “Fractal Mediation.” In Renn, O., Webler, T., and Wiedeman, P., eds. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 117140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elstub, S. & Escobar, O., eds., (2019). Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, J. (2019). Democracy when the People are Thinking, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fournier, P., van der Kolk, H., & Carty, R. K. (2011). When Citizens Decide: Lessons from Citizen Assemblies on Electoral Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastil, J. & Wright, E. O. (2018). Legislature by Lot: Envisioning Sortition within a Bicameral System. Politics & Society, 46 (3), 303330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, E. (2010). Deliberative Democracy and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Considering Constitutional Juries. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (2), 327359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. E. & Dryzek, J. S. (2006). Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics. Politics & Society, 34 (2), 219244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grönlund, K., Bächtiger, A. & Setälä, M., eds. (2014). Deliberative Mini-publics: Practices and Prospects, Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Lafont, C. (2020). Democracy without Shortcuts. A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. (2013). Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Leib, E. J. (2004). Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, M. K. & Warren, M. E. (2012). Two Trust-Based Uses of Minipublics in Democratic Systems. In Parkinson, J., and Mansbridge, J., eds., Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 95124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemeyer, S. (2014). Scaling Up Deliberation to Mass Publics: Harnessing Mini-Publics in a Deliberative System. In Grönlund, K., Bächtiger, A., and Setälä, M., eds., Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 177201.Google Scholar
Smith, G. & Setälä, M. (2019). Mini-Publics and Deliberative Democracy. In Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J., and Warren, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 300314.Google Scholar
Spector, H. (2009). The Right to a Constitutional Jury. Legisprudence, 3 (1), 111123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurn, C. (2011). Judicial Review, Constitutional Juries and Civic Constitutional Fora: Rights, Democracy and Law. Theoria, 58 (2), 6394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bellamy, R. (2007). Political Constitutionalism. A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, J. H. (1982). Democracy and Distrust. A Theory of Judicial Review, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 4th printing.Google Scholar
Fiss, O. M. (1979). Forms of Justice. Harvard Law Review, 93 (1), 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fombad, C. M. (2017). An Overview of Contemporary Models of Constitutional Review in Africa. In Fombad, C. M., ed., Constitutional Adjudication in Africa, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1748.Google Scholar
Garlicki, L. (2007). Constitutional courts versus supreme courts, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5 (1), 4468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D. (2009). Constitutions, Constitutional Courts and Constitutional Interpretation at the Interface of Law and Politics. In Iancu, B., ed., The Law/Politics Distinction in Contemporary Public Law Adjudication, Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, pp. 2134.Google Scholar
Häcker, B. & Ernst, W., eds. (2020). Collective Judging in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge: Intersentia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, S. (2015). Fragile Democracies. Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landfried, C., ed. (2019). Judicial Power. How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lübbe-Wolff, G. (2016). Cultures of Deliberation in Constitutional Courts. In Maraniello, P., ed., Justicia Constitucional, Vol. 1, Resistencia – Chaco: ConTexto Libreria, pp. 3752.Google Scholar
Lübbe-Wolff, G. (2022). Beratungskulturen. Wie Verfassungsgerichte arbeiten, und wovon es abhängt, ob sie integrieren oder polarisieren, Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Morrison, T., Weiler, J. H. H. (2009). Introduction to the Art Collection of 22, Washington Square North, New York.Google Scholar
Saunders, C. (2017). Constitutional Review in Asia: A Comparative Perspective. In Chen, A. H. Y., Harding, A., eds., Constitutional Courts in Asia: A Comparative Perspective, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3259.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. & Shapiro, M. (2002). Abstract and Concrete Review in the United States. In Shapiro, M., Sweet, A. Stone, eds., On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 347375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Brinks, D. M., & Blass, A. (2017). Rethinking Judicial Empowerment: The New Foundations of Constitutional Justice. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 15 (2), 296331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbank, S. B. (2007). Judicial Independence, Judicial Accountability and Interbranch Relations. The Georgetown Law Journal, 95 (4), pp. 909927.Google Scholar
Castagnola, A. (2018). Manipulating Courts in New Democracies: Forcing Judges off the Bench in Argentina, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, J. (1999). Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence. Southern California Law Review, 72 (2–3), pp. 353384.Google Scholar
Garoupa, N. & Ginsburg, T. (2009). Guarding the Guardians: Judicial Councils and Judicial Independence. American Journal of Comparative Law, 57 (1), pp. 103134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlan, P. S. (2007). Judicial Independences. Georgetown Law Journal, 95 (4), pp. 10411059.Google Scholar
Kosař, D., & Šipulová, K. (2023). Comparative Court-Packing. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 21 (1), 80–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popova, M. (2012). What is Judicial Independence? In Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, P. H. (2001). Toward a General Theory of Judicial Independence. In Russell, P. H. and O’Brien, D. M. O., eds., Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from around the World. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, pp. 124.Google Scholar
Tiede, L. B. (2006). Judicial Independence: Often Cited, Rarely Understood. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 15 (1), pp. 129161.Google Scholar
Voigt, S., Gutmann, J., & Feld, L. P. (2015). Economic growth and judicial independence, a dozen years on: Cross-country evidence using and updated set of indicators. European Journal of Political Economy, 38 (C), pp. 197211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bellamy, R. (2011). Political Constitutionalism and the Human Rights Act. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9 (1), 86111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2012). Rights as Democracy, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 15 (4), 449471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1996a). Does Britain Need a Bill of Rights? In Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 352372.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1996b). Introduction: The Moral Reading and the Majoritarian Premise. In Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 138.Google Scholar
Ely, J. H. (1980). Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fabre, C. (2000). A Philosophical Argument for a Bill of Rights. British Journal of Political Science, 30 (1), 7798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1995). On the Internal Relation between the Rule of Law and Democracy. European Journal of Philosophy, 3 (1), 1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, L. (1958). The Bill of Rights, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiebert, J. L. (2006). Parliamentary Bills of Rights: An Alternative Model? Modern Law Review, 69 (1), 728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, M. (1980). Darkness on the Edge of Town: The Contribution of John Hart Ely to Constitutional Theory, Yale Law Journal, 89 (6), 10371062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (1999). Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ch. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Allan, T. (1994). Law, Liberty and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, P. (1996). Administrative Law, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2000). Form and Substance in the Rule of Law: A Democratic Justification for Judicial Review? In Forsyth, C., ed., Judicial Review and the Constitution. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Elliott, M. (2001). The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Elliott, M., & Varuhas, J. (2017). Administrative Law: Text and Materials, 5th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, C. (2000). Judicial Review and the Constitution, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Harlow, C., & Rawlings, R. (2009). Law and Administration, 3rd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M. (2010). Foundations of Public Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. (2012). Searching for the State in British Legal Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, D. (1999). Common Values and the Public-Private Divide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawlings, R. (2008). Modelling Judicial Review. Current Legal Problems, 61(1), 95123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunkin, M., & Payne, S. (1999). The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political Analysis, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Alexy, R. (2010). A Theory of Constitutional Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press (esp. pp. 349364).Google Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W. (2017). Fundamental Rights as Constitutional Principles. In Constitutional and Political Theory. Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 235265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. (2014). On the (In)compatibility of Human Rights Discourse and Private Law. In Micklitz, H., ed., Constitutionalization of European Private Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 2660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, S. (2011). The Structure and Scope of Constitutional Rights. In Ginsburg, T. and Dixon, R., eds., Comparative Constitutional Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 387405.Google Scholar
Gerstenberg, O. (2004). What Constitutions Can Do (but Courts Sometimes Don’t): Property, Speech, and The Influence of Constitutional Norms on Private Law. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 17 (1), 6181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D. (2016). Constitutionalism. Past, Present, and Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press (esp. Chapter IV).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D. (2017). Verfassung und Privatrecht im 19. Jahrhundert. Die Formationsphase, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2011). A Transnational Genealogy of Proportionality in Private Law. In Brownsword, R., Micklitz, H.-W., Niglia, L., and Weatherill, S., eds., The Foundations of European Private Law. London: Hart Publishing, pp. 185220.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2019). A Political Economy of Contemporary Legality, forthcoming. In Kjaer, Poul Fritz, ed., The Law of Political Economy: Transformations of the Function of Law. Cambridge University Press. At https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3334107.Google Scholar
King, J. (2024). The Rule of Law. In R. Bellamy and J. King, eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 297315.Google Scholar
Michelman, F. (2011). The Interplay of Constitutional and Ordinary Jurisdiction. In Ginsburg, T., and Dixon, R., eds., Comparative Constitutional Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 278297.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2005). The Relationship between Judicial Review of Legislation and the Interpretation of Non-Constitutional Law, with Reference to Third Party Effect. In Sajó, A. and Uitz, R., eds., The constitution in private law relations. Expanding constitutionalism. Utrecht: Eleven Int’l Publ., pp. 167182.Google Scholar
van der Walt, J. (2014). The Horizontal Effect Revolution and the Question of Sovereignty, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bellamy, R. (2007). Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, J. & Sager, L. (2002). Commitment and Constitutionalism. Texas Law Review, 81 (7), 19291963.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. & Versteeg, M. (2014). Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review? The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 30 (3), 587622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, A. (2013). International Organizations and the Frankenstein Problem. European Journal of International Law, 24 (4), 9991025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isiksel, T. (2016). Europe’s Functional Constitution: A Theory of Constitutionalism Beyond the State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinlein, T. & Peters, A. (2018). International Constitutional Law. In Oxford Bibliographies. Available from: www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199796953/obo-9780199796953-0039.xml.Google Scholar
Krisch, N. (2012). Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kumm, M. (2005). The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty. European Law Journal, 11 (3), 262307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavel, C. (2021). Law Beyond the State: Dynamic Coordination, State Consent, and Binding International Law, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavel, C. (2021). The Rule of Law and the Limits of Anarchy. Legal Theory, 27 (1), 7095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, S. (2015). The Thin Justice of International Law: A Moral Reckoning of the Law of Nations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (1999a). Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walen, A. (2009). Judicial Review in Review: A Four-Part Defense of Legal Constitutionalism. A Review Essay on Political Constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7 (2), 329354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Alter, K. (2001). Establishing the Supremacy of European Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. & Castiglione, D. (2018). From Maastricht to Brexit: Democracy, Constitutionalism and Citizenship in the EU, London: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, C. (2012). European Integration: From Nation-States to Member States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, T. A. & Risse, T. (2019). Grand Theories of Integration and the Challenges of Comparative Regionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 26 (8) pp. 12311252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, T. A. & Risse, T. (2021). Grand Theories of Integration and the Challenges of Comparative Regionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 26 (8) pp. 12311252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Burca, G. & Weiler, J. H. H., eds. (2012). The Worlds of European Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunoff, J. & Trachtman, J., eds. (2009). Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eleftheriadis, P. (2020). A Union of Peoples. Europe as a Community of Principle, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, J. & Sager, L. Commitment and Constitutionalism. Texas Law Review, vol. 81, pp. 19291963.Google Scholar
Grimm, D. (2017). The Constitution of European Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isiksel, T. (2016). Europe’s Functional Constitution. A Theory of Constitutionalism beyond the State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, P. J. (2005). A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Larsen, S. (2021). The Constitutional Theory of the Federation and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindseth, P. (2010). Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maduro, M. P. (2005). The importance of being called a constitution: Constitutional authority and the authority of constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3 (3), pp. 332356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. (2004). The Judicial Construction of Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versteeg, M. & Zackin, E. (2016). Constitutions Unentrenched: Toward an Alternative Theory of Constitutional Design. American Political Science Review, 110 (4), pp. 657674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N. (2008). Taking constitutionalism beyond the state. Political Studies, 56 (3), pp. 519543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J. (1999). The Constitution of Europe. Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, J. (2019). Politics of Last Resort: Governing by Emergency in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bernstorff, J. von (2019). The Decay of the International Rule of Law Project (1990–2015). In Krieger, H., Nolte, G., & Zimmermann, A., eds., The International Rule of Law – Rise or Decline? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boysen, S. (2021). Die postkoloniale Konstellation, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottier, T. (2000). Limits to International Trade: The Constitutional Challenge. In The American Society of International Law (ed.), International Law in Ferment: A New Vision for Theory and Practice, Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting (5–8 April), pp. 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daugirdas, K. (2016). How and Why International Law Binds International Organizations. Harvard Journal of International Law, 57 (2), 325381.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. von (1851). Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Grenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen, written in 1792, Breslau: Trewendt.Google Scholar
Joseph, S. (2011). Blame it on the WTO?: A Human Rights Critique, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochi, T. (2020). Global Justice and Social Conflict: The Foundations of Liberal Order and International Law, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krajewski, M. (2019). International Organizations or Institutions, Democratic Legitimacy. In Peters, A., & Wolfrum, R., eds., Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lagarde, C. (2016). Making Globalisation Work for All, Sylvia Ostry Lecture, Toronto (13 September).Google Scholar
Ley, I. (2015). Opposition in International Law: Alternativity and Revisibility as Elements of a Legitimacy Concept for Public International Law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 28 (3), 717742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. (2009). Dual Democracy. In Klabbers, J., Peters, A., & Ulfstein, G., The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 263341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. (2016). International Organizations and International Law. In Katz Cogan, J., Hurd, I., & Johnstone, I., eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3359.Google Scholar
Peters, A. (2018). Global Constitutionalism: The Social Dimension. In Suami, T., Peters, A., Vanoverbeke, D., & Kumm, M., eds., Global Constitutionalism from European and East Asian Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 277350.Google Scholar
Saunders, C. (2019). Global Constitutionalism – Myth and Reality. In Varuhas, J. N. E., & Wilson Stark, S., eds., The Frontiers of Public Law, Oxford: Hart, pp. 1940.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. F. (2017). To Reform the World: International Organizations and the Making of Modern States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Jönsson, C. (2013). The Opening up of International Organizations: Transnational Access in Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, C. (2012). Why Global Constitutionalism Does not Live up to its Promises. Goettingen Journal of International Law, 4 (2), 551574.Google Scholar
Zacklin, R. (1968). The Amendment of the Constitutive Instruments of the United Nations and Specialised Agencies, Brill (reprint 2005).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Institutions
  • Edited by Richard Bellamy, University College London, Jeff King, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
  • Online publication: 27 March 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Institutions
  • Edited by Richard Bellamy, University College London, Jeff King, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
  • Online publication: 27 March 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Institutions
  • Edited by Richard Bellamy, University College London, Jeff King, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
  • Online publication: 27 March 2025
Available formats
×