Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:23:08.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

62 - Biopharmaceutical Compliance

from Part IX - Analysis of Particular Fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2021

Benjamin van Rooij
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Amsterdam
D. Daniel Sokol
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Abstract: The global pharmaceutical market is projected to approach $1170 billion by the year 2021; the US market alone currently accounts for 45 percent of the market, at nearly $500 billion. International legal frameworks share fundamental characteristics governing the development, evaluation, and approval of drugs and biological products, including clinical trials demonstrating safety and efficacy; good laboratory, clinical, and manufacturing practices; appropriate labeling; and robust reporting and post-market surveillance. This chapter explores regulatory compliance in the pharmaceutical industry drawing from recent scholarship, federal agency reports and materials, and publicly available corporate resources. Coverage will focus specifically on the US market, with general discussion of international trends as well.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayres, Ian, and Braithwaite, John. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chrai, Suffly S., and Burd, Michelle. 2004. “Consent Decrees: Effects on Consumers, Companies, and Investors.” Pharmaceutical Technology 28: 168–82.Google Scholar
Deloitte Center for Regulatory Strategy, Americas. 2019. Leading in Times of Change: Life Sciences Regulatory Outlook 2019, www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/regulatory/us-insurance-regulatory-outlook-2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Glicksman, Robert L., and Earnhart, Dietrich. 2015. “Coercive vs. Cooperative Enforcement: Effect of Enforcement Approach on Environmental Management.” International Review of Law & Economy 42: 135–46.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Wendy C., and Snyder, Lynn Shapiro. 2003. “The OIG’s Draft Compliance Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers: One More Compliance ‘Script’ for the Healthcare Industry.” Food and Drug Law Institute Update 2630.Google Scholar
Green, Michael D. 1997. “Statutory Compliance and Tort Liability: Examining the Strongest Case.” University of Michigan Journal of Legal Reform 30: 461510.Google Scholar
Hale, Andrew, Borys, David, and Adams, Mark. 2011. “Regulatory Overload: A Behavioral Analysis of Regulatory Compliance.” Working Paper No. 11–47, Mercatus Center: George Mason University, 131.Google Scholar
Hans, Mohit, and Gupta, Suresh Kumar. 2018. “Comparative Evaluation of Pharmacovigilence Regulation of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India, and the Need for Global Harmonized Practices.” Perspectives in Clinical Research 9(4): 170–4.Google Scholar
Hindin, David A., and Silberman, D.. 2016. “Designing More Effective Rules and Permits.” George Washington Journal of Energy and Environmental Law 7: 103–23.Google Scholar
Miller, Jennifer E., Wilenzick, Marc, Ritcey, Nolan, Ross, Joseph S., and Mello, Michelle M.. 2017. “Measuring Clinical Trial Transparency: An Empirical Analysis of Newly Approved Drugs and Large Pharmaceutical Companies.” British Medical Journal Open 7: e017917. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/12/e017917.Google Scholar
Niedelman, Steven M. 2005. “Remarks at the Food and Drug Law Institute’s 48th Annual Conference.” Food and Drug Law Journal 60: 117.Google ScholarPubMed
Noah, Lars. 2000. “Rewarding Regulatory Compliance: The Pursuit of Symmetry in Products Liability.” Georgetown Law Journal 88: 2147–65.Google Scholar
Olson, Mary K. 1995. “Regulatory Discretion Among Competing Industries: Inside the FDA.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 11: 379405.Google Scholar
Olson, Mary K. 1996. “Substitution in Regulatory Agencies: FDA Enforcement Alternatives.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 12: 376407.Google Scholar
Olson, Mary K. 1999. “Agency Rulemaking, Political Influences, Regulation, and Industry Compliance.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15: 573601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Robert A. Jr. et al. 2015. “Sustainability and Stratified Noncompliance in the Pharmaceutical Industry.” Journal of International Business Disciplines 1: 1840.Google Scholar
Poska, Richard, and Graham, Ballard. 2009. “FDA 483 Responses-Suggestions for Industry.” Journal of Validation Technology 5762.Google Scholar
Prayle, Andrew P., Hurly, Matthew N., and Smyth, Alan R.. 2012. “Compliance with Mandatory Reporting of Clinical Trials Results on ClinicalTrials.gov: Cross Sectional Study.” British Medical Journal Open 344: d7373. www.bmj.com/content/bmj/344/bmj.d7373.full.pdf.Google Scholar
Rabin, Robert L. 2000. “Reassessing Regulatory Compliance.” Georgetown Law Journal 88: 2147–65.Google Scholar
Sclar, David, and Keilty, Gary. 2012. “Sunshine and Strategy: Managing and Monitoring Compliance with PPACA’s Sunshine Provisions – Evolving Legal Requirements and Operational Considerations.” Health Lawyer 24: 1424.Google Scholar
Tyler, Ralph S. 2013. “The Goals of FDA Regulation and the Challenges of Meeting Them.” Health Matrix 22: 423–6.Google Scholar
Wiktorowicz, Mary E. 2003. “Emergent Patterns in the Regulation of Pharmaceuticals: Institutions and Interests in the United States, Canada, Britain and France.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 28(4): 615–58.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×