Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Competition Law Sanctions
- The Cambridge Handbook of Competition Law Sanctions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Authors’ Affiliations
- Acknowledgment
- Part I General Chapters
- Part II Country Reports
- 17 Competition Law Sanctions in Austria
- 18 Antitrust Enforcement in Belgium
- 19 The Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions: Brazil
- 20 The Present Situation and Improvement Direction of the Sanction System in China’s Anti-monopoly Law
- 21 Application of the 2006 Guidelines on Fines by the European Commission and the Union Courts
- 22 Competition Law Sanctions in Germany
- 23 Competition Law Sanctions in Hungary
- 24 Competition Law Sanctions in Indonesia and a Comparison to Other ASEAN Member States
- 25 Competition Law Sanctions in Italy
- 26 Competition Law Sanctions in Japan
- 27 Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions: Kenya
- 28 The Enforcement of Competition Law in the Netherlands
- 29 A Barking Dog Seldom Bites
- 30 Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions
- 31 Competition Law Sanctions in Spain
- 32 The Swedish Competition Law Enforcement System
- 33 Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions: Turkey
- 34 Competition Law Sanctions in the United Kingdom
21 - Application of the 2006 Guidelines on Fines by the European Commission and the Union Courts
from Part II - Country Reports
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2022
- The Cambridge Handbook of Competition Law Sanctions
- The Cambridge Handbook of Competition Law Sanctions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Authors’ Affiliations
- Acknowledgment
- Part I General Chapters
- Part II Country Reports
- 17 Competition Law Sanctions in Austria
- 18 Antitrust Enforcement in Belgium
- 19 The Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions: Brazil
- 20 The Present Situation and Improvement Direction of the Sanction System in China’s Anti-monopoly Law
- 21 Application of the 2006 Guidelines on Fines by the European Commission and the Union Courts
- 22 Competition Law Sanctions in Germany
- 23 Competition Law Sanctions in Hungary
- 24 Competition Law Sanctions in Indonesia and a Comparison to Other ASEAN Member States
- 25 Competition Law Sanctions in Italy
- 26 Competition Law Sanctions in Japan
- 27 Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions: Kenya
- 28 The Enforcement of Competition Law in the Netherlands
- 29 A Barking Dog Seldom Bites
- 30 Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions
- 31 Competition Law Sanctions in Spain
- 32 The Swedish Competition Law Enforcement System
- 33 Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions: Turkey
- 34 Competition Law Sanctions in the United Kingdom
Summary
The imposition of effective cartel sanctions is shaped by the policy of and guidelines from enforcing authorities, such as the European Commission, as well as the Union Courts. The application of the 2006 Guidelines on Fines has been guided by the jurisprudence of the Union Courts. The Courts have in general upheld the fining methodology expressed in the guidelines and have clarified the way it should be applied in specific situations. The fact that the system of setting and reviewing EU competition fines was found lawful adds to the legitimacy of such fines and their enhanced deterrent effect. The aim of authorities and reviewing courts is to impose adequate and deterrent sanctions, while respecting the rights of defence of the undertakings.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Competition Law Sanctions , pp. 367 - 380Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022