Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:38:07.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - Literacy

Understanding Normal and Impaired Reading Development through Personalized Large-Scale Neurocomputational Models

from Part III - Education and School-Learning Domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

Olivier Houdé
Affiliation:
Université de Paris V
Grégoire Borst
Affiliation:
Université de Paris V
Get access

Summary

How do children learn to read? How do deficits in various components of the reading network affect learning outcomes? How does remediating one or several components change reading performance? In this chapter, we summarize what we know about learning-to-read and how previous computational models have tackled this issue. We then present our developmentally plausible computational model of reading acquisition and show how it helps to understand both normal and impaired reading development (dyslexia). In particular, we show that it is possible to simulate individual learning trajectories and intervention outcomes on the basis of three component skills: orthography, phonology and vocabulary. The work advocates a multi-factorial computational approach of understanding reading that has practical implications for dyslexia and intervention.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19, 551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DfE (2013). (Department for Education) Statutory guidance: National curriculum in England: Framework for key stages 1 to 4. Available from www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4. Last accessed 18 August 2021.Google Scholar
Di Bono, M., & Zorzi, M. (2013). Deep generative learning of location-invariant visual word recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentaz, E., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Theurel, A., & Colé, P. (2013). Reading comprehension in a large cohort of French first graders from low socio-economic status families: A 7-month longitudinal study. PLoS ONE, 8, e78608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J. (1992). Orthographic neighborhoods and visual word recognition. In Frost, R., & Katz, L. (eds.), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning. Advances in Psychology (Vol. 94, pp. 131146). Oxford: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1994). A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 11581176.Google Scholar
Hannagan, T., Ziegler, J. C., Dufau, S., Fagot, J., & Grainger, J. (2014). Deep learning of orthographic representations in baboons. PLoS ONE, 9, e84843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huey, E. B. (1908/1968). The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., Bowyer-Crane, C., Carroll, J. M., Duff, F. J., & Snowling, M. J. (2012). The causal role of phoneme awareness and letter-sound knowledge in learning to read: Combining intervention studies with mediation analyses. Psychological Science, 23(6), 572577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-p: An interactive activation, multiple readout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (eds.), Localist Connectionist Approaches to Human Cognition (Scientific Psychology Series, pp. 147188). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kohnen, S., Nickels, L., Castles, A., Friedmann, N., & McArthur, G. (2012). When ‘slime’ becomes ‘smile’: Developmental letter position dyslexia in English. Neuropsychologia, 50, 36813692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landerl, K., Ramus, F., Moll, K., Lyytinen, H., Leppanen, P. H., Lohvansuu, K., et al., (2013). Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 686694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88, 375407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menghini, D., Finzi, A., Benassi, M., Bolzani, R., Facoetti, A., Giovagnoli, S., et al. (2010). Different underlying neurocognitive deficits in developmental dyslexia: A comparative study. Neuropsychologia, 48, 863872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulesu, E., Danelli, L., & Berlingeri, M. (2014). Reading the dyslexic brain: Multiple dysfunctional routes revealed by a new meta-analysis of PET and fMRI activation studies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennington, B. F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101, 385413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 106151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, C., Zorzi, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2019). Understanding dyslexia through personalized large-scale computational models. Psychological Science, 30, 386395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, R. L., Pennington, B. F., & Olson, R. K. (2012). Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Testing the predictions of the dual-route and connectionist frameworks. Cognition, 126, 2038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2009). Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, S. C., Coltheart, M., Marinus, E., & Castles, A. (2018). A computational model of the self-teaching hypothesis based on the dual-route cascaded model of reading. Cognitive Science, 42, 722770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Testolin, A., Stoianov, I., & Zorzi, M. (2017). Letter perception emerges from unsupervised deep learning and recycling of natural image features. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 657664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woollams, A. M. (2014). Connectionist neuropsychology: Uncovering ultimate causes of acquired dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20120398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, J. C. (2006). Do differences in brain activation challenge universal theories of dyslexia? Brain & Language, 98, 341343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, J. C. (2018). Différences inter-linguistiques dans l’apprentissage de la lecture. Langue Francaise, 119, 3549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., et al. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Castel, C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario, F. X., & Perry, C. (2008). Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition, 107, 151178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2006). Becoming literate in different languages: Similar problems, different solutions. Developmental Science, 9, 429436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., & Lorenzi, C. (2009). Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia. Developmental Science, 12, 732745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20120397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2019). Modeling the variability of developmental dyslexia. In Perfetti, C., Pugh, K., & Verhoeven, L. (eds.), Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems (pp. 350371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2020). Learning to Read and Dyslexia: From Theory to Intervention Through Personalized Computational Models. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 293300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29, 600618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 11311161.Google Scholar
Zorzi, M., Testolin, A., & Stoianov, I. P. (2013). Modeling language and cognition with deep unsupervised learning: A tutorial overview. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×