Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis
- The Cambridge Handbook of Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction to the Handbook of Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis
- Part I General Issues in Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis
- 2 Psychometrics and Psychological Assessment
- 3 Multicultural Issues in Clinical Psychological Assessment
- 4 Ethical and Professional Issues in Assessment
- 5 Contemporary Psychopathology Diagnosis
- 6 Assessment of Noncredible Reporting and Responding
- 7 Technological Advances in Clinical Assessment
- 8 Psychological Assessment as Treatment
- 9 Writing a Psychological Report Using Evidence-Based Psychological Assessment Methods
- Part II Specific Clinical Assessment Methods
- Part III Assessment and Diagnosis of Specific Mental Disorders
- Part IV Clinical Assessment in Specific Settings
- Index
- References
4 - Ethical and Professional Issues in Assessment
from Part I - General Issues in Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 December 2019
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis
- The Cambridge Handbook of Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction to the Handbook of Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis
- Part I General Issues in Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis
- 2 Psychometrics and Psychological Assessment
- 3 Multicultural Issues in Clinical Psychological Assessment
- 4 Ethical and Professional Issues in Assessment
- 5 Contemporary Psychopathology Diagnosis
- 6 Assessment of Noncredible Reporting and Responding
- 7 Technological Advances in Clinical Assessment
- 8 Psychological Assessment as Treatment
- 9 Writing a Psychological Report Using Evidence-Based Psychological Assessment Methods
- Part II Specific Clinical Assessment Methods
- Part III Assessment and Diagnosis of Specific Mental Disorders
- Part IV Clinical Assessment in Specific Settings
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter addresses the essential ethical and professional considerations when conducting psychological assessments. Testing impacts the life of examinees in a variety of ways from licensing examinations and screening for certain professions to custody evaluations and competency to be executed. Ethical practice in the area of assessment reflects good clinical practice. Topics include informed consent, confidentiality, the involvement of third parties in assessment, external consequences, test construction, test revisions, obsolete tests and outdated test results, cultural competence, test data and test security, assessment in the digital age, as well as the less frequently addressed topic of report writing and providing assessment feedback. A good ethical decision-making framework as well as the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (APA 2017a) and the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (AERA et. al. 2014) provide guidance on preventing ethical issues from becoming ethical challenges both currently and as new ethical issues in assessment continue to emerge.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Adams, K. A. (2000). Practical and ethical issues pertaining to test revisions Psychological Assessment, 12(3),281–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AERA (American Educational Research Association), APA (American Psychological Association), & NCME (National Council on Measurement in Education). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
APA (American Psychological Association). (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.Google Scholar
APA (American Psychological Association). (2017a). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. www.apa.org./ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
APA (American Psychological Association). (2017b). Multicultural guidelines: An ecological approach to context, identity, and intersectionality. www.apa.org/about/policy/multicultural-guidelines.pdfGoogle Scholar
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory – II. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar
Behnke, S. (2005). Thinking ethically as psychologists: Reflections on Ethical Standards 2.01, 3.07, 9.08, and 10.04. Monitor on Psychology, 36(6). www.apa.org/monitor /jun05/ethics.htmlGoogle Scholar
Berk, S. N. (2005). Consumers speak. We need to listen. The Pennsylvania Psychologist Quarterly, 68(5), 2, 20.Google Scholar
Bersoff, D. N., & Hoffer, P. J. (2003). Legal issues in computerized psychological testing. In Bersoff, D. N. (Ed.), Ethical conflicts in psychology (3rd ed., pp. 300–302). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Bersoff, D. N., De Matteo, D., & Foster, E. E. (2012). Assessment and testing. In Knapp, S. J. (Ed.), APA handbook of ethics in psychology. Vol. 2: Practice, teaching, research (pp. 45–74). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. M., & Ponirakis, A. (2000). Computer-administered interviews with children about maltreatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 682–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brabender, V. (2018). Ethics in diversity-sensitive assessment. In Smith, S. R. & Krishnamurthy, R. (Eds.), Diversity-sensitive personality assessment (pp. 333–348). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buchanan, T. (2002). Online assessment: Desirable of dangerous? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 148–154.Google Scholar
Bush, S. S. (2010). Determining whether or when to adopt new versions of psychological and neuropsychological tests: Ethical and professional considerations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24, 7–16.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. N. (1992). Introduction to the special section: Providing psychological test feedback to clients. Psychological Assessment, 4(3), 267.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, L., Vasquez, M., Behnke, S., & Kinscherff, R. (2010). APA ethics code commentary and case illustrations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Chan, A. S., Shum, D., & Cheung, R. W. Y. (2003). Recent development of cognitive and neuropsychological assessment in Asian countries. Psychological Assessment, 15, 257–267.Google Scholar
Finn, S. E., & Tonsager, M. E. (1992). Therapeutic effects of providing MMPI-2 test feedback to college students awaiting therapy. Psychological Assessment, 4(3), 278–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, C. B. (2017). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Sage.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B., & Fried, A. L. (2003). Internet-mediated psychological services and the American Psychological Association Ethics Code. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 40, 103–111.Google Scholar
Flynn, J. R. (1999). Searching for justice: The discovery of IQ gains over time. American Psychologist, 54, 5–20.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. J. (2004). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Jacob, S., & Hartshorne, T.S. (2007). Ethics and law for school psychologists (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Knapp, S. J., & Vandecreek, L. D. (2012). Practical ethics for psychologists: A positive approach (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, S. J., VandeCreek, L. D., & Fingerhut, R. (2017). Practical ethics for psychologists: A positive approach (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Knapp, S., Younggren, J. N., VandeCreek, L., Harris, E., & Martin, J. N. (2013). Assessing and managing risk in psychological practice: An individualized approach (2nd ed.). Rockville, MD: The Trust.Google Scholar
Knauss, L. K. (2007). Our ethical responsibility to provide culturally competent personality assessment. SPA Exchange, 19(2), 4, 12–13.Google Scholar
Knauss, L. K. (2009a). Are you informed about informed consent? SPA Exchange, 21(1), 4, 14, 15.Google Scholar
Knauss, L. K. (2009b). Informed consent, part II: Ideas for your informed consent agreement. SPA Exchange, 21(2), 4, 14.Google Scholar
Knauss, L. K. (2011). Ethics, assessment, and the internet. SPA Exchange, 23(1), 4, 12, 13.Google Scholar
Knauss, L. K. (2012). Ethical considerations in assessment report writing. SPA Exchange, 24(1), 4, 13, 14.Google Scholar
Knauss, L. K. (2013). The pros and cons of computerized assessment. SPA Exchange, 25(1), 4, 12, 13.Google Scholar
Knauss, L. K. (2015). Ethical considerations in assessment feedback. SPA Exchange, 27(2), 4, 16, 17.Google Scholar
Knauss, L. K. (2017). Response to article by Williams and Lally: What is the best test to use. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 48(4), 279–281.Google Scholar
Koocher, G. P. (2007). Twenty-first century ethical challenges for psychology. American Psychologist, 62(5), 375–384.Google Scholar
Koocher, G. P., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2008). Ethics is psychology and the mental health profession: Standards and cases (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leach, M. M., & Oakland, T. (2007). Ethics standards impacting test development and use: A review of 31 ethics codes impacting practices in 35 countries. International Journal of Testing, 7(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, S. (1997). Cultural competence in psychotherapy: A guide for clinicians and their supervisors. In Watkins, C. E. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 570–588). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35, 1012–1027.Google Scholar
Naglieri, J. A., Drasgow, F., Schmidt, M., Handler, L., Prifitera, A., Margolis, A., & Velasquez, R. (2004). Psychological testing on the Internet: New problems, old issues. America Psychologist, 59, 150–162.Google Scholar
Pelco, L. E., Ward, S. B., Coleman, L., & Young, J. (2009). Teacher ratings of three psychological report styles. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(1), 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, K. S. (1992). Responsibilities in providing psychological test feedback to clients. Psychological Assessment, 4(3), 268–271.Google Scholar
Schulenberg, S. E., & Yutrzenka, B. A. (2004). Ethical issues in the use of computerized assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 477–490.Google Scholar
Tharinger, D. J., Finn, S. E., Hersh, B., Wilkinson, A., Christopher, G. B., & Tran, A. (2008). Assessment feedback with parents and preadolescent children: A collaborative approach. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(6), 600–609.Google Scholar
Wolber, G. J., & Carne, W. F. (2002). Writing psychological reports: A guide for clinicians (2nd ed.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.Google Scholar
Wright, A. J. (2011). Conducting psychological assessment: A guide for practitioners. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by