Amengual, M. (2019). Type of early bilingualism and its effect on the acoustic realization of allophonic variants: Early sequential and simultaneous bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(5), 954–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archibald, J. (2009). Phonological feature re-assembly and the importance of phonetic cues. Second Language Research, 25(2), 231–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archibald, J. (2021). Ease and difficulty in L2 phonology: A mini-review. Frontiers in Communication, 6. www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2021.626529/full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berwick, R. (1985). The Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Best, C. & Tyler, A. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J., eds., Second Language Speech Learning: The Role of Language Experience in Speech Perception and Production. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boersma, P. (1998). Functional Phonology. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam]. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar

Boersma, P. & Hayes, B. (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 45–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bordag, D., Gor, K., & Opitz, A. (2021). Ontogenesis model of the L2 lexical representation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brannen, K. (2002). The role of perception in differential substitution. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 47, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broselow, E. (2004). Unmarked structures and emergent rankings in second language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8(1), 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broselow, E. (2018). Laryngeal contrasts in second language phonology. In Hyman, L. & Plank, F., eds., Linguistic Typology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 312–340.Google Scholar

Broselow, E., Chen, S., & Wang, C. (1998). The emergence of the unmarked in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broselow, E. & Finer, D. (1991). Parameter setting in second language phonology. Second Language Research, 7(1), 35–59.Google Scholar

Broselow, E. & Xu, Z. (2004). Differential difficulty in the acquisition of second language phonology. International Journal of English Studies, 4(2), 145–163.Google Scholar

Browman, C. & Goldstein, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6, 201–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, C. (2000). Speech perception and phonological acquisition. In Archibald, J., ed., Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 4–63.Google Scholar

Cardoso, W. (2007). The variable development of English word-final stops by Brazilian Portuguese speakers: A stochastic optimality theoretic account. Language Variation and Change, 19, 219–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardoso, W., Collins, L., & Cardoso, W. (2021). Developmental sequences in second language phonology: Effects of instruction on the acquisition of foreign sC onsets. Frontiers in Communication, 6. www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2021.662934/full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardoso, W., John, P., & French, L. (2008). The variable perception of /s/ + coronal onset clusters in Brazilian Portuguese English. In Watkins, M. A., Rauber, A. S., & Baptista, B. O., eds., Recent Research in Second Language Phonetics/Phonology: Perception and Production. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 203–231.Google Scholar

Cardoso, W. & Liakin, D. (2008). When input frequency patterns fail to drive learning: The acquisition of sC onset clusters. In Watkins, M. A., Rauber, A. S., & Baptista, B. O., eds., Recent Research in Second Language Phonetics/Phonology: Perception and Production. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 174–202.Google Scholar

Chang, C. (2019). Phonetic drift. In Schmid, M. S. & Köpke, B., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language Attrition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 191–207.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Clements, N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook, 2, 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, L. (2005). Addressing phonological questions with ultrasound. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 619–633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davidson, L. (2006). Phonotactics and articulatory coordination interact in phonology: Evidence from nonnative production. Cognitive Science, 30, 837–862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davidson, L. (2010). Phonetic bases of similarities in cross-language production: Evidence from English and Catalan. Journal of Phonetics, 38(2), 272–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Jong, K., Hao, Y.-C., & Park, H. (2009). Evidence for featural units in the acquisition of speech production skills: Linguistic structure in foreign accent. Journal of Phonetics, 37(4), 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Jong, K., Silbert, N. H., & Park, H. (2009). Generalization across segments in second language identification. Language Learning, 59(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27(2), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckman, F. R. (1981). On the naturalness of interlanguage phonological rules. Language Learning, 31, 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckman, F. (2004). From phonemic differences to constraint rankings: Research on second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 513–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edge, B. (1991). The production of word-final voiced obstruents in English by L1 speakers of Japanese and Cantonese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, J. G. H. (2014). The role of input frequency, universals, and L1 transfer in the acquisition of English L2 onsets by native speakers of Cantonese, Mandarin Chinese, and Vietnamese. In Yavas, M., ed., Unusual Productions in Phonology: Universals and Language-Specific Considerations. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 206–225.Google Scholar

Escudero, P. & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1988). Chinese subjects’ perception of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast: Performance before and after training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1684–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1991). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(1), 395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore, MD: York Press, pp. 233–273.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. & Davidian, R. D. (1984). Transfer and developmental processes in adult foreign language speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E. & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frisch, S. (2009). Language processing and segmental OCP effects. In Hayes, B., Kirchner, R., & Steriade, D., eds., Phonetically-Based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346–371.Google Scholar

Gafos, A. (2002). A grammar of gestural coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20, 269–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, J. (1979). Autosegmental Phonology. [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar

Gonzales, K. & Lotto, A. J. (2013). A Bafri, un Pafri: Bilinguals’ pseudoword identifications support language-specific phonetic systems. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2135–2142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guion, S. (2005). Knowledge of English word stress patterns in early and late Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 27(4), 503–533.Google Scholar

Guion, S., Harada, T., & Clark, J. J. (2004). Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(3), 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hancin-Bhatt, B. (1994). Segmental transfer: A consequence of a dynamic system. Second Language Research, 10, 241–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hancin-Bhatt, B. & Bhatt, R. (1998). Optimal L2 syllables: Interactions of transfer and developmental effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 331–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayes, B. (1985). A Metrical Theory of Stress Rules. [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, B. & Wilson, C. (2008). A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonological learning. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(3), 379–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kager, R. (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kager, R., Pater, J., & Zonneveld, W. (2004). Constraints in Phonological Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, Y. (2008). Interlanguage segmental mapping as evidence for the nature of lexical representation. Language and Linguistic Compass, 2, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kisseberth, C. (1970). On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry, 1, 291–306.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P. K. & Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic experience and the “perceptual magnet effect.” In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore, MD: York Press, pp. 121–154.Google Scholar

Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics Across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Larson-Hall, J. (2004). Predicting perceptual success with segments: A test of Japanese speakers of Russian. Second Language Research, 20, 32–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lombardi, L. (2003). Second language data and constraints on manner: Explaining substitutions for the English interdentals. Second Language Research, 19, 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macleod, A. N. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (2005). Are bilinguals different? What VOT tells us about simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 3(2), 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Major, R. (1987). A model for interlanguage phonology. In Ioup, G. & Weinberger, S., eds., Interlanguage Phonology: The Acquisition of a Second Language Sound System. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House, pp. 101–124.Google Scholar

Martinez, R. M., Goad, H., & Dow, M. (2023). L1 phonological effects on L2 (non-)naïve vowel perception: A cross-language investigation of the oral-nasal vowel contrast in Brazilian Portuguese. Second Language Research, 39(2), 387–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moreton, E. (2002). Structural constraints in the perception of English stop-sonorant clusters. Cognition, 84, 55–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Olson, D. J. (2019a). Feature acquisition in L2 phonetic development: Evidence from phonetic training. Language Learning, 69(2), 366–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, D. J. (2019b). Phonological processes across word and language boundaries: Evidence from code-switching. Journal of Phonetics, 77, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Özçelik, Ö. (2018). Universal grammar and second language phonology: Full transfer/prevalent access in the L2 acquisition of Turkish “stress” by English and French speakers. Language Acquisition, 25(3), 231–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sagey, E. (1986). The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].Google Scholar

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selkirk, E. (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, M. & Oehrle, R., eds., Language Sound Structure: Studies in Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 107–136.Google Scholar

Song, J. Y. & Eckman, F. (2021). Using ultrasound tongue imaging to study covert contrasts in second-language learners’ acquisition of English vowels. Language Acquisition, 28(4), 344–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stampe, D. (1979). How I Spent My Summer Vacation (A Dissertation on Natural Phonology). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago]. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar

Trofimovich, P., Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2007). A dynamic look at L2 phonological learning: Seeking processing explanations for implicational phenomena. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 407–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Leussen, J. W. & Escudero, P. (2015). Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1000. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wang, C. (1995). The acquisition of English word-final obstruents by Chinese speakers. [Doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University].Google Scholar

Weinberger, S. H. (1987). The influence of linguistic context on syllable simplification. In Ioup, G. & Weinberger, S. H., eds., Interlanguage Phonology: The Acquisition of a Second Language Sound System. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 401–417.Google Scholar

Wester, F., Gilbers, D., & Lowie, W. (2007). Substitution of dental fricatives in English by Dutch L2 speakers. Language Sciences, 29, 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, C. & Davidson, L. (2013). Bayesian analysis of non-native cluster production. In Kan, S., Moore-Cantwell, C., & Staubs, R., eds, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Student Association, pp. 265–278.Google Scholar

Wiltshire, C. (2006). Word-final consonant and cluster acquisition in Indian English(es). In Bamman, D., Magnitskaia, T., & Zaller, C., eds., Boston University Conference on Language Development 30 Online Proceedings Supplement. www.bu.edu/bucld/files/2011/05/30-WiltshireBUCLD2005.pdf.Google Scholar

Wissing, D. & Zonneveld, W. (1996). Final devoicing as a robust phenomenon in second language acquisition: Tswana, English, and Afrikaans. South African Journal of Linguistics, 14, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yavas, M. (1997). The effects of vowel height and place of articulation in interlanguage final stop devoicing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 35(2), 115–125.Google Scholar

Zhang, H. (2016). Dissimilation in the second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones. Second Language Research, 32(3), 427–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zsiga, E. (2003). Articulatory timing in a second language: Evidence from Russian and English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 399–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamou, E., Feltgen, Q., & Padure, C. (2021). A unified approach to the study of language contact: Cross-language priming and change in adjective/noun order. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(6), 1635–1654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambridge, B. (2020a). Against stored abstractions: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition. First Language, 40(5–6), 509–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambridge, B. (2020b). Abstractions made of exemplars or “You’re all right, and I’ve changed my mind”: Response to commentators. First Language, 40(5–6), 640–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amengual, M. (2012). Interlingual influence in bilingual speech: Cognate status effect in a continuum of bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 517–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amengual, M. (2016). Cross-linguistic influence in the bilingual mental lexicon: Evidence of cognate effects in the phonetic production and processing of a vowel contrast. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 617. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baayen, R. H., Beaman, K. V., & Ramscar, M. (2021). Deconfounding the effects of competition and attrition on dialect across the lifespan: A panel study investigation of Swabian. In Beaman, K. V. & Buchstaller, I., eds., Language Variation and Language Change Across the Lifespan. New York: Routledge, pp. 235–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backus, A. (2013). A usage-based approach to borrowability. In Zenner, E. & Kristiansen, G., eds., New Perspectives on Lexical Borrowing: Onomasiological, Methodological and Phraseological Innovations. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backus, A. (2021). Usage-based approaches. In Adamou, E. & Matras, Y., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Language Contact. New York: Routledge, pp. 110–126.Google Scholar

Barlow, M. & Kemmer, S. (2000). Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar

Barnes, S. (2015). Perceptual salience and social categorization of contact features in Asturian Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8(2), 213–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, S. (2019). The role of social cues in the perception of final vowel contrasts in Asturian Spanish. In Chappell, W., ed., Recent Advances in the Study of Spanish Sociophonetic Perception. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 16–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., et al. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59, 1–26.Google Scholar

Bérces, K. B. & Honeybone, P. (2020). Representation-based models in the current landscape of phonological theory. Acta Linguistica Academica, 67(1), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, E. K. & Copple, M. T. (2018). Constructing two phonological systems: A phonetic analysis of /p/, /t/, /k/ among early Spanish-English bilingual speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(1), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, E. L. (2015). The role of discourse context frequency in phonological variation: A usage-based approach to bilingual speech production. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(4), 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, E. L. (2018). Cumulative exposure to phonetic reducing environments marks the lexicon: Spanish /d-/ words spoken in isolation. In Smith, K. A. & Nordquist, D., eds., Functionalist and Usage-Based Approaches to the Study of Language: In Honor of Joan L. Bybee. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, E. L. & Amengual, M. (2015). Fine-grained and probabilistic cross-linguistic influence in the pronunciation of cognates: Evidence from corpus-based spontaneous conversation and experimentally elicited data. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8(1), 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, E. L. & Harper, D. (2009). Phonological evidence of interlingual exemplar connections. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 2(2), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, E. L., Raymond, W. D., Brown, E. K., & File-Muriel, R. J. (2021). Lexically specific accumulation in memory of word and segment speech rates. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 17(3), 625–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bullock, B. E. & Gerfen, C. (2004). Phonological convergence in a contracting language variety. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, J. (1999). Usage-based phonology. In Darnell, M., Moravcsik, E., Newmeyer, F., Noonan, M., & Wheatly, K., eds., Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 212–242.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, J. (2002a). Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change, 14(3), 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, J. (2002b). Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In Givón, T. & Mall, B. F., eds., The Evolution of Language Out of Pre-language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 109–135.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. (2006). Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, J. (2012). Patterns of lexical diffusion and articulatory motivations for sound change. In Josep-Sole, M. & Recasens, D., eds., The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production, and Social Factors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Carrasco-Ortiz, H., Amengual, M., & Gries, S. T. (2021). Cross-language effects of phonological and orthographic similarity in cognate word recognition: The role of language dominance. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(3), 389–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohn, A. C. & Renwick, M. E. (2021). Embracing multidimensionality in phonological analysis. Linguistic Review, 38(1), 101–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Vogelaer, G. & Seiler, G. (2012). The dialect laboratory: Introductory remarks. In The Dialect Laboratory: Dialects as a Testing Ground for Theories of Language Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Divjak, D. (2017). The role of lexical frequency in the acceptability of syntactic variants: Evidence from that‐clauses in Polish. Cognitive Science, 41(2), 354–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Docherty, G. J. & Foulkes, P. (2014). An evaluation of usage-based approaches to the modelling of sociophonetic variability. Lingua, 142, 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drager, K. & Kirtley, M. J. (2016). Awareness, salience, and stereotypes in exemplar-based models of speech production and perception. In Babel, A., ed., Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Dussias, P. E. & Sagarra, N. (2007). The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. (2012). What can we count in language, and what counts in language acquisition, cognition, and use? In Gries, S. Th. & Divjak, D., eds., Frequency Effects in Language Learning and Processing, Volume 1. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forrest, J. (2017). The dynamic interaction between lexical and contextual frequency: A case study of (ING). Language Variation and Change, 29(2), 129–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gahl, S. (2008). Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language, 84(3), 474–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gampe, A., Quick, A. E., & Daum, M. M. (2021). Does linguistic similarity affect early simultaneous bilingual language acquisition? Journal of Language Contact, 13(3), 482–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaskins, D. (2020). Input-output effects in the bilingual first language acquisition of English and Polish: A usage-based perspective. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 10(4), 471–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Givón, T. (1998). The functional approach to grammar. In Tomasello, M., ed., The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 41–66.Google Scholar

Gradoville, M., Waltermire, M., & Long, A. (2021). Cognate similarity and intervocalic /d/ production in Riverense Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(3), 727–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haiman, J. (1994). Ritualization and the development of language. In Pagliuca, W., ed., Perspectives on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hakimov, N. (2021). Lexical frequency and frequency of co-occurrence predict the use of embedded-language islands in bilingual speech: Adjective-modified nominal constituents in Russian-German code-mixing. Journal of Language Contact, 13(3), 501–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hakimov, N. & Backus, A. (2021). Usage-based contact linguistics: Effects of frequency and similarity in language contact. Journal of Language Contact, 13(3), 459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, M., Miglio, V., & Gries, S. Th. (2015). Mexican and Chicano Spanish prosody: Differences related to information structure. In Levis, J., Mohammed, R., Qian, M., & Zhou, Z., eds., Proceedings of the 6th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Ames: Iowa State University, pp. 38–48.Google Scholar

Hay, J. & Foulkes, P. (2016). The evolution of medial /t/ over real and remembered time. Language, 92(2), 298–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinskens, F. (2011). Koineization in the present-day Dutch dialect landscape: Postvocalic /r/ and more. Taal en Tongval, 63(1), 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopper, P. J. (1987). Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 139–157.Google Scholar

Hopper, P. & Traugott, E. (1993). Grammaticalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jaeger, T. F. & Weatherholtz, K. (2016). What the heck is salience? How predictive language processing contributes to sociolinguistic perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1115. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Johnson, K. & Mullenix, J. W., eds., Talker Variability in Speech Processing. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 145–165.Google Scholar

Johnson, K. (2007). Decisions and mechanisms in exemplar-based phonology. In Solé, M., Beddor, P., & Ohala, M., eds., Experimental Approaches to Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanwit, M. & Terán, V. (2020). Ideas buenas o buenas ideas: Phonological, semantic, and frequency effects on variable adjective ordering in Rioplatense Spanish. Languages, 5(4), 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemmer, S. & Barlow, M. (2000). Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In Kemmer, S. & Barlow, M., eds., Usage-Based Models of Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 7–28.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., Bogulski, C. A., & McClain, R. (2012). Psycholinguistic perspectives on second language learning and bilingualism: The course and consequence of cross-language competition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langacker, R. (2016). Entrenchment in cognitive grammar. In Schmid, H. J., ed., Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How We Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 39–56.Google Scholar

Levy, H. & Hanulíková, A. (2019). Variation in children’s vowel production: Effects of language exposure and lexical frequency. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 10(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lin, Y., Yao, Y., & Luo, J. (2021). Phonetic accommodation of tone: Reversing a tone merger-in-progress via imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 87, 101060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

López-Beltrán, P. & Carlson, M. T. (2020). How usage-based approaches to language can contribute to a unified theory of heritage grammars. Linguistics Vanguard, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2019-0072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mora, J. C. & Nadeu, M. (2009). Experience effects on the categorization of a native vowel contrast in highly proficient Catalan-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 2775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mompean, J. A., Fregier, A., & Valenzuela, J. (2020). Iconicity and systematicity in phonaesthemes: A cross-linguistic study. Cognitive Linguistics, 31(3), 515–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morford, J. P., Occhino, C., Zirnstein, M., et al. (2019). What is the source of bilingual cross-language activation in deaf bilinguals? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 24(4), 356–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Onysko, A. (2019). Reconceptualizing language contact phenomena as cognitive processes. In Zenner, E., Backus, A., & Winter-Froemel, E., eds., Cognitive Contact Linguistics: Placing Usage, Meaning and Mind at the Core of Contact-Induced Variation and Change. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 23–50.Google Scholar

Piccardi, D. (2019). Bilingual frequency in a favorable context (BFFC) in the Italian dialectal area: Theoretical preliminaries to the analysis of geminate lateral retroflexion and voiceless plosives aspiration in Antona (MS). In Piccardi, D., Ardolino, F., & Calamai, S., eds, Gli archivi sonori al crocevia tra scienze fonetiche, informatica umanistica e patrimonio digitale. Naples: Associazione Italiana Scienze della Voce, pp. 329–351.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P., eds., Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N., eds., Laboratory Phonology, Vol. 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 101–140.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2003). Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In Rens, B., Hay, J., & Jannedy, S., eds., Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 177–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poplack, S. (2020). A variationist perspective on language contact. In Adamou, E. & Matras, Y., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Language Contact. London: Routledge, pp. 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, M. T., Carlson, M., & Reitter, D. (2018). Integrated, not isolated: Defining typological proximity in an integrated multilingual architecture. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Quick, A. E. & Verschik, A. (2019). Usage-based contact linguistics: An introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics Review, 12, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raymond, W. D., Brown, E. L., & Healy, A. F. (2016). Cumulative context effects and variant lexical representations: Word use and English final t/d deletion. Language Variation and Change, 28(2), 175–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmid, H. J. (2016). Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How We Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Shenk, P. S. (2006). The interactional and syntactic importance of prosody in Spanish-English bilingual discourse. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(2), 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sherkina, M. (2003). The cognate facilitation effect in bilingual speech processing. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 21, 135–151.Google Scholar

Simonet, M. (2014). Phonetic consequences of dynamic cross-linguistic interference in proficient bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 43, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomason, S. G. & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, R. & Ferreira, F. (2000). Lexical frequency and voiced labiodental-bilabial variation in new Mexican Spanish. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 19(2), 1–17.Google Scholar

Van Coetsem, F. (1988). Loan Phonology and the Two Transfer Types in Language Contact. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waltermire, M. & Gradoville, M. (2020). The interaction of social factors in the acoustically gradient realization of intervocalic /d/ in Border Uruguayan Spanish. In Rao, R., ed., Spanish Phonetics and Phonology in Contact: Studies from Africa, the Americas, and Spain. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wasserscheidt, P. (2021). A usage-based approach to “language” in language contact. Applied Linguistics Review, 12(2), 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinreich, U. (1952). Languages in Contact. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Winford, D. (2003). An Introduction to Contact Linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar

Amengual, M. (2019). Type of early bilingualism and its effect on the acoustic realization of allophonic variants: Early sequential and simultaneous bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(5), 954–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amengual, M., & Chamorro, P. (2015). The effects of language dominance in the perception and production of the Galician mid vowel contrasts. Phonetics, 72, 207–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ansaldo, A. I., Marcotte, K., Scherer, L., & Raboyeau, G. (2008). Language therapy and bilingual aphasia: Clinical implications of psycholinguistic and neuroimaging research. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 539–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, B., Farrar, D., & Bradford, G. (1974). Evaluation reactions of college students to dialect differences in the English of Mexican-Americans. Language and Speech, 17(3), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baird, B. (2015). Pre-nuclear peak alignment in the Spanish of Spanish-K’ichee’ (Mayan) bilinguals. In Willis, E. W., Butragueño, P. M., & Zendejas, E. H., eds., Selected Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 163–174.Google Scholar

Barnes, S. (2016). Variable back vowels in urban Asturian Spanish. Spanish in Context, 13(1), 1-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, A. (2013). The Guidebook to Sociolinguistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, A. (2016). Succeeding waves: Seeking sociolinguistic theory for the twenty-first century. In Coupland, N., ed., Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berrebi, S., Bassel, N., & Gafter, R. J. (2022). Hearing Hebrew pharyngeals: Experimental evidence for a covert phonemic distinction. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 28(2) (selected papers from NWAV 49 [2021]), article 3. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol28/iss2/3.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 240–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Birdsong, D. (2015). Dominance in bilingualism: Foundations of measurement, with insights from the study of handedness. In Silva-Corvalán, C. & Traffers-Dallers, J., eds., Language Dominance in Bilingualism: Issues of Measurement and Operationalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birdsong, D., Gertken, L. M., & Amengual, M. (2012). Bilingual Language Profile: An Easy-to-Use Instrument to Assess Bilingualism. Austin: COERLL, University of Texas at Austin. https://sites.la.utexas.edu/bilingual.Google Scholar

Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bullock, B. & Toribio, A. J. (2009). The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code-Switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chappell, W. (2019a). The sociophonetic perception of heritage Spanish speakers in the United States: Reactions to labiodentalized in the speech of late immigrant and U.S.-born voices. In Chappell, W., ed., Recent Advances in the Study of Spanish Sociophonetic Perception. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chappell, W. (2019b). Recent Advances in the Study of Spanish Sociophonetic Perception. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, M. (2022). Sociolinguistics and language shift in Ecuador: A case study of palatals. [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University].Google Scholar

Coupland, N. (2001). Language, situation, and the relational self: Theorizing dialect-style in sociolinguistics. In Eckert, P. & Rickford, J. R., eds., Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 185–210.Google Scholar

Davidson, J. (2019). Covert and overt attitudes towards Catalonian Spanish laterals and intervocalic fricatives. In Chappell, W., ed., Recent Advances in the Study of Spanish Sociophonetic Perception. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 39–84.Google Scholar

De Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s “speaking” model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Delgado-Diaz, G., Galarza, I., & Díaz-Campos, M. (2021). Complex attitudes towards two sociolinguistic variables and their social meanings: Providing evidence from production and perception data in a speech community. In Díaz-Campos, M. & Sessarego, S., eds., Aspects of Latin American Spanish Dialectology: In Honor of Terrell A. Morgan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 125–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Díaz-Campos, M. (2013). Segmental phonology in L2 Spanish. In Geeslin, K., ed., The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley–Blackwell, pp. 146–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Díaz-Campos, M. (2014). Introducción a la sociolingüística hispánica. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Díaz-Campos, M., & Dickinson, S. (2019). Using statistics as a tool in the analysis of sociolinguistic variation: A comparison of current and traditional methods. In Rei-Doval, G. & Tejedo-Herrero, F., eds., Lusophone, Galician, and Hispanic Linguistics: Bridging Frames and Traditions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Díaz-Campos, M., Escalona Torres, J. M., & Filimonova, V. (2020). Sociolinguistics of the Spanish-speaking world. Annual Review of Linguistics, 6, 363–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, P. (1989). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change, 1, 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, P. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erker, D. & Bruso, J. (2017). Uh, bueno, em … Filled pauses as a site of contact-induced change in Boston Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 29(2), 205–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15(2), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 233–277.Google Scholar

Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 409–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freed, B., Dewey, D., Segalowitz, N., & Halter, R. (2004). The language contact profile. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingual: Life and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guión, S. (2003). The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals: Age of acquisition effects on the mutual influence of the first and second languages. Phonetica, 60(2), 98–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Henriksen, N. & Fafulas, S. (2017). Prosodic timing and language contact: Spanish and Yagua in Amazonian Peru. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 10(2), 225–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirson, A. & Sohail, N. (2007). Variability of rhotics in Punjabi-English bilinguals. In Trouvain, J. & Barry, W., eds., Proceedings ICPhS XVI. Saabrücken, pp. 1501–1504. www.icphs2007.de/conference/Papers/1623/1623.pdf.Google Scholar

Hoffman, M. & Walker, J. (2010). Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto. Language Variation and Change, 22(1), 37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, D. E. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, J. Y. (2011). Discrepancy between the perception and production of stop consonants by Spanish heritage speakers in the United States. [Master’s thesis, Korea University].Google Scholar

Lambert, W., Hodgson, R., Gardner, R., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 44–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Li, W. (2000). The Bilingualism Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lindholm-Leary, K. (2020). Developing Spanish in dual language programs. In Potowski, K. & Muñoz-Basols, J., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Spanish as a Heritage Language. New York: Routledge, pp. 433–444.Google Scholar

Lipski, J. M. (2019). Field-testing code-switching constraints: A report on a strategic languages project. Languages, 4(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4010007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masgoret, A. M. & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and Associates. Language Learning, 53(1), 123–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKinnon, S. (2020). Quantifying propagation in language contact: A variationist analysis of stops in bilingual (Spanish-Kaqchikel Maya) Guatemalan Spanish. [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University].Google Scholar

Michnowicz, J. & Carpenter, L. (2013). Voiceless stop aspiration in Yucatan Spanish: A sociolinguistic analysis. Spanish in Context, 10(3), 410–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milroy, L. (1980). Language and Social Networks. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mohamed, S., González, C., & Muntendam, A. (2019). Arabic-Spanish language contact in Puerto Rico: A case of glottal stop epenthesis. Languages, 4(4), 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Rourke, E. (2010). Dialect differences and the bilingual vowel space in Peruvian Spanish. In Ortega-Llebaria, M., ed., Selected Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 20–30.Google Scholar

O’Rourke, E. (2012). The realization of contrastive focus in Peruvian Spanish intonation. Lingua, 122(5), 494–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollock, M., Willis, E., & Díaz-Campos, M. (2023). The perception of coda /ɾ/ and /l/ in Dominican Spanish: Diversity, geography, and sociolinguistic variation [La percepción de la coda /ɾ/ y /l/ en el español dominicano: diversidad, geografía y variación sociolingüística]. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana [International Journal of Ibero-American Linguistics], 21(42), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.31819/rili-2023-214209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potowski, K. (2005). Fundamentos de la enseñanza del español a los hablantes nativos en los Estados Unidos [Foundations in Teaching Spanish to Native Speakers in the United States]. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar

R Foundation. (2022). The R Project for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar

Romaine, S. (1994). Language and Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schilling-Estes, N. (2013). Investigating stylistic variation. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., & Schilling-Estes, N., eds., The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

Sharma, D. (2018). Style dominance: Attention, audience, and the “real me.” Language in Society, 47, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shea, C. (2019). Dominance, proficiency, and Spanish heritage speakers’ production of English and Spanish vowels. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silva-Corvalán, C. (2014). Bilingual Language Acquisition: Spanish and English in the First Six Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonet, M. (2010). Dark and clear laterals in Catalan and Spanish: Interaction of phonetic categories in early bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 663–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strandberg, J. A. E., Gooskens, C., & Schüppert, A. (2021). Simultaneous bilingualism and speech style as predictors of variation in allophone production: Evidence from Finland-Swedish. Journal of Phonetics, 88, 101095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagliamonte, S. A. (2015). Making Waves: The Story of Variationist Sociolinguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valdés, G. (2000). Introduction. In Sandstedt, L., ed., Spanish for Native Speakers. New York: Harcourt College.Google Scholar

Valdés, G. & Geoffrion-Vinci, M. (2011). Heritage language students: The case of Spanish. In Díaz-Campos, M., ed., The Handbook of Hispanic Sociolinguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 598–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zentella, A. C. (1995). La hispanofobia del movimiento “Inglés oficial” en los Estados Unidos por la oficialización del inglés. Alteridades, 5(10), 55–65.Google Scholar

Zentella, A. C. (1997). Growing Up Bilingual: Puerto Rican Children in New York. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Amengual, M. (2012). Interlingual influence in bilingual speech: Cognate status effect in a continuum of bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 517–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amengual, M. (2018). Asymmetrical interlingual influence in the production of Spanish and English laterals as a result of competing activation in bilingual language processing. Journal of Phonetics, 69, 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balukas, C. & Koops, C. (2015). Spanish-English bilingual voice onset time in spontaneous code-switching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(4), 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, C., Hirsh, K. W., Johnston, R. A., & Williams, C. L. (2001). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the locus of repetition priming of picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 350–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Munro, M. J. & Bohn, O.-S., eds., Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, E. (2014). The role of discourse context frequency in phonological variation: A usage-based approach to bilingual speech production. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(4), 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1283–1296.Google ScholarPubMed

Cummins, R. (2000). “How does it work?” vs. “What are the laws?” Two conceptions of psychological explanation. In Keil, F. & Wilson, R., eds., Explanation and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 117–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81, B77–B86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Bruin, A., Samuel, A. G., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2018). Voluntary language switching: When and why do bilinguals switch between their languages? Journal of Memory and Language, 103, 28–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Declerck, M. & Philipp, A. M. (2015). A review of control processes and their locus in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 1630–1645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dell, G. S., Kelley, A. C., Hwang, S., & Bian, Y. (2021). The adaptable speaker: A theory of implicit learning in language production. Psychological Review, 128, 446–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deuchar, M., Davies, P., Herring, J., Parafita Couto, M. C., & Carter, D. (2014). Building bilingual corpora. In Thomas, E. M. & Mennen, I., eds., Advances in the Study of Bilingualism. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emmorey, K., Borinstein, H. B., Thompson, R., & Gollan, T. H. (2008). Bimodal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 233–277.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In Wayland, R., ed., Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fibla, L., Sebastian-Galles, N., & Cristia, A. (2022). Is there a bilingual disadvantage for word segmentation? A computational modeling approach. Journal of Child Language, 49(6), 1119–1146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000921000568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fink, A. & Goldrick, M. (2015). The influence of word retrieval and planning on phonetic variation: Implications for exemplar models. Linguistics Vanguard, 1, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gade, M., Declerck, M., Philipp, A. M., Rey-Mermet, A., & Koch, I. (2021). Assessing the evidence for asymmetrical switch costs and reversed language dominance effects – A meta-analysis. Journal of Cognition, 4, 55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldrick, M. & Blumstein, S. E. (2006). Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(6), 649–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldrick, M., Runnqvist, E., & Costa, A. (2014). Language switching makes pronunciation less nativelike. Psychological Science, 25(4), 1031–1036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gollan, T. H. & Ferreira, V. S. (2009). Should I stay or should I switch? A cost-benefit analysis of voluntary language switching in young and aging bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 640.Google ScholarPubMed

Gollan, T. H. & Goldrick, M. (2016). Grammatical constraints on language switching: Language control is not just executive control. Journal of Memory and Language, 90, 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gollan, T. H. & Goldrick, M. (2018). A switch is not a switch: Syntactically-driven bilingual language control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(1), 143.Google Scholar

Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, D. W. & Wei, L. (2014). A control process model of code-switching. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(4), 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grosjean, F. (1997). Processing mixed language: Issues, findings, and models. In de Groot, A. M. B. & Kroll, J. F., eds., Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 225–254.Google Scholar

Johnson, K. (2021). SPiCE: Speech in Cantonese and English. Scholars Portal Dataverse, V1. https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/MJOXP3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kilbourn-Ceron, O. & Goldrick, M. (2021). Variable pronunciations reveal dynamic intra-speaker variation in speech planning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 28, 1365–1380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kleinman, D. & Gollan, T. H. (2018). Inhibition accumulates over time at multiple processing levels in bilingual language control. Cognition, 178, 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W. (2011). Knowledge of a second language influences auditory word recognition in the native language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 952.Google ScholarPubMed

Lauro, J. & Schwartz, A. I. (2017). Bilingual non-selective lexical access in sentence contexts: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, C. & Gollan, T. H. (2021). What cognates reveal about default language selection in bilingual sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language, 118, 104214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Li, P. (2013). Computational modeling of bilingualism: How can models tell us more about the bilingual mind? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 241–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lisker, L. & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marian, V. & Spivey, M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within-and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonald, M. & Kaushanskaya, M. (2020). Factors modulating cross-linguistic co-activation in bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 81, 100981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meuter, R. F. I. & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mousikou, P. & Rastle, K. (2015). Lexical frequency effects on articulation: A comparison of picture naming and reading aloud. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Myers-Scotton, C. & Jake, J. (2009). A universal model of code-switching and bilingual language processing and production. In Bullock, B. & Toribio, A. J., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Codeswitching. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 336–357.Google Scholar

Roelofs, A. (2004). Seriality of phonological encoding in naming objects and reading their names. Memory & Cognition, 32, 212–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Runnqvist, E., Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2014). Bilingual word access. In Goldrick, M., Ferreira, V. S., & Miozzo, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language Production. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 182–198.Google Scholar

Sharma, D. & Sankaran, L. (2011). Cognitive and social forces in dialect shift: Gradual change in London Asian speech. Language Variation and Change, 23(3), 399–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shook, A. & Marian, V. (2013). The bilingual language interaction network for comprehension of speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 304–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smolensky, P. (1999). Grammar-based connectionist approaches to language. Cognitive Science, 23, 589–613.Google Scholar

Van Leussen, J. & Escudero, P. (2015). Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abutalebi, J. & Green, D. (2007). Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(3), 242–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexandrou, A. M., Saarinen, T., Kujala, J., & Salmelin, R. (2020). Cortical entrainment: What we can learn from studying naturalistic speech perception. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(6), 681–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arredondo, M. M., Hu, X.-S., Satterfield, T., & Kovelman, I. (2017). Bilingualism alters children’s frontal lobe functioning for attentional control. Developmental Science, 20(3), e12377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barac, R., Moreno, S., & Bialystok, E. (2016). Behavioral and electrophysiological differences in executive control between monolingual and bilingual children. Child Development, 87(4), 1277–1290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beres, A. M. (2017). Time is of the essence: A review of electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in language research. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 42(4), 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bidelman, G. M. (2018). Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech. NeuroImage, 175, 56–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blanco-Elorrieta, E., Ding, N., Pylkkänen, L., & Poeppel, D. (2020). Understanding requires tracking: Noise and knowledge interact in bilingual comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(10), 1975–1983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bohland, J. W., Tourville, J. A., & Guenther, F. H. (2019). Neural bases of speech production. In Katz, W. F. & Assmann, P. F., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Phonetics. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 126–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouchard, K. E., Mesgarani, N., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2013). Functional organization of human sensorimotor cortex for speech articulation. Nature, 495(7441), 327–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Callan, D. E., Tajima, K., Callan, A. M., et al. (2003). Learning-induced neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic contrast. NeuroImage, 19(1), 113–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cavanagh, J. F. & Frank, M. J. (2014). Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(8), 414–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cavanagh, J. F., Frank, M. J., Klein, T. J., & Allen, J. J. (2010). Frontal theta links prediction errors to behavioral adaptation in reinforcement learning. NeuroImage, 49(4), 3198–3209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chandrasekaran, B., Gandour, J. T., & Krishnan, A. (2007). Neuroplasticity in the processing of pitch dimensions: A multidimensional scaling analysis of the mismatch negativity. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25(0), 195–210.Google ScholarPubMed

Coffey, E. B. J., Herholz, S. C., Chepesiuk, A. M. P., Baillet, S., & Zatorre, R. J. (2016). Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG. Nature Communications, 7(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffey, E. B. J., Nicol, T., White-Schwoch, T., et al. (2019). Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response. Nature Communications, 10(1), 5036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crosse, M. J., Di Liberto, G. M., Bednar, A., & Lalor, E. C. (2016). The multivariate Temporal Response Function (mTRF) toolbox: A MATLAB toolbox for relating neural signals to continuous stimuli. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Danylkiv, A. & Krafnick, A. J. (2020). A meta-analysis of gray matter differences between bilinguals and monolinguals. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dupoux, E., & Gout, A. (2000). Electrophysiological correlates of phonological processing: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 635–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Di Liberto, G. M., Crosse, M. J., & Lalor, E. C. (2018). Cortical measures of phoneme-level speech encoding correlate with the perceived clarity of natural speech. eNeuro, 5(2), https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0084-18.2018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Di Liberto, G. M., Nie, J., Yeaton, J., et al. (2021). Neural representation of linguistic feature hierarchy reflects second-language proficiency. NeuroImage, 227, 117586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di Liberto, G. M., O’Sullivan, J. A., & Lalor, E. C. (2015). Low-frequency cortical entrainment to speech reflects phoneme-level processing. Current Biology, 25(19), 2457–2465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ding, N., Chatterjee, M., & Simon, J. Z. (2014). Robust cortical entrainment to the speech envelope relies on the spectro-temporal fine structure. NeuroImage, 88, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ding, N., Melloni, L., Yang, A., et al. (2017). Characterizing neural entrainment to hierarchical linguistic units using electroencephalography (EEG). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2016). Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature Neuroscience, 19(1), 158–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ding, N. & Simon, J. Z. (2014). Cortical entrainment to continuous speech: Functional roles and interpretations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fedorenko, E. & Blank, I. A. (2020). Broca’s area is not a natural kind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4), 270–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feng, G., Li, Y., Hsu, S.-M., et al. (2021). Emerging native-similar neural representations underlie non-native speech category learning success. Neurobiology of Language, 2(2), 280–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feng, G., Yi, H. G., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2019). The role of the human auditory corticostriatal network in speech learning. Cerebral Cortex, 29(10), 4077–4089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ferrari, M. & Quaresima, V. (2012). A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application. NeuroImage, 63(2), 921–935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Friederici, A. D. (2015). White-matter pathways for speech and language processing. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 129, 177–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ganushchak, L., Christoffels, I., & Schiller, N. O. (2011). The use of electroencephalography in language production research: a review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

García-Pentón, L., Pérez Fernández, A., Iturria-Medina, Y., Gillon-Dowens, M., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Anatomical connectivity changes in the bilingual brain. NeuroImage, 84, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

García-Sierra, A., Ramírez-Esparza, N., Silva-Pereyra, J., Siard, J., & Champlin, C. A. (2012). Assessing the double phonemic representation in bilingual speakers of Spanish and English: An electrophysiological study. Brain and Language, 121(3), 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrido, M. I., Friston, K. J., Kiebel, S. J., et al. (2008). The functional anatomy of the MMN: A DCM study of the roving paradigm. NeuroImage, 42(2), 936–944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garrido, M. I., Kilner, J. M., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2009). The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(3), 453–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Giordano, V., Alexopoulos, J., Spagna, A., et al. (2021). Accent discrimination abilities during the first days of life: An fNIRS study. Brain and Language, 223, 105039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Giraud, A.-L. & Poeppel, D. (2012). Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience, 15(4), 511–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Giroud, N., Baum, S. R., Gilbert, A. C., Phillips, N. A., & Gracco, V. (2020). Earlier age of second language learning induces more robust speech encoding in the auditory brainstem in adults, independent of amount of language exposure during early childhood. Brain and Language, 207, 104815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gnanateja, G. N., Rupp, K., Llanos, F., et al. (2021). Frequency-following responses to speech sounds are highly conserved across species and contain cortical contributions. ENeuro, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0451-21.2021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Golestani, N. & Zatorre, R. J. (2004). Learning new sounds of speech: Reallocation of neural substrates. NeuroImage, 21(2), 494–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Golestani, N. & Zatorre, R. J. (2009). Individual differences in the acquisition of second language phonology. Brain and Language, 109(2–3), 55–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grant, A., Dennis, N. A., & Li, P. (2014). Cognitive control, cognitive reserve, and memory in the aging bilingual brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hamilton, L. S. & Huth, A. G. (2020). The revolution will not be controlled: Natural stimuli in speech neuroscience. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(5), 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, P., Kringelbach, M., & Salmelin, R. (2010). MEG: An Introduction to Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haxby, J. V. (2012). Multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI: The early beginnings. NeuroImage, 62(2), 852–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hernandez, A. E. (2013). The Bilingual Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(5), 393–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. (2016). Neural basis of speech perception. In Hickok, G. & Small, S. L., eds., Neurobiology of Language. New York: Academic Press, pp. 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huettel, S. A. (2012). Event-related fMRI in cognition. NeuroImage, 62(2), 1152–1156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jakoby, H., Goldstein, A., & Faust, M. (2011). Electrophysiological correlates of speech perception mechanisms and individual differences in second language attainment: Speech perception and individual differences. Psychophysiology, 48(11), 1517–1531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jasińska, K. K. & Guei, S. (2018). Neuroimaging field methods using functional near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) neuroimaging to study global child development: Rural sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 132, 57165.Google Scholar

Kaan, E. (2007). Event‐related potentials and language processing: A brief overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 571–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krishnan, A., Xu, Y., Gandour, J., & Cariani, P. (2005). Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(1), 161–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krizman, J., Marian, V., Shook, A., Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2012). Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(20), 7877–7881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuhl, P. K., Stevenson, J., Corrigan, N. M., et al. (2016). Neuroimaging of the bilingual brain: Structural brain correlates of listening and speaking in a second language. Brain and Language, 162, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonard, M. K. & Chang, E. F. (2014). Dynamic speech representations in the human temporal lobe. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(9), 472–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Li, P., Legault, J., & Litcofsky, K. A. (2014). Neuroplasticity as a function of second language learning: Anatomical changes in the human brain. Cortex, 58, 301–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lloyd-Fox, S., Moore, S., Darboe, M., et al. (2016). fNIRS in Africa & Asia: An objective measure of cognitive development for global health settings. FASEB Journal, 30(S1), 1149.18. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.1149.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luck, S. J. (2014). An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mesgarani, N., Cheung, C., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2014). Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus. Science, 343(6174), 1006–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morales, J., Yudes, C., Gómez-Ariza, C. J., & Bajo, M. T. (2015). Bilingualism modulates dual mechanisms of cognitive control: Evidence from ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 66, 157–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(12), 2544–2590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nourski, K. V., Reale, R. A., Oya, H., et al. (2009). Temporal envelope of time-compressed speech represented in the human auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(49), 15564–15574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Olsen, R. K., Pangelinan, M. M., Bogulski, C., et al. (2015). The effect of lifelong bilingualism on regional grey and white matter volume. Brain Research, 1612, 128–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peelle, J. E. & Davis, M. H. (2012). Neural oscillations carry speech rhythm through to comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peltola, M. S., Tamminen, H., Toivonen, H., Kujala, T., & Näätänen, R. (2012). Different kinds of bilinguals – Different kinds of brains: The neural organisation of two languages in one brain. Brain and Language, 121(3), 261–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peng, C. & Hou, X. (2021). Applications of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in neonates. Neuroscience Research, 170, 18–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Petitto, L. A., Berens, M. S., Kovelman, I., et al. (2012). The “Perceptual Wedge Hypothesis” as the basis for bilingual babies’ phonetic processing advantage: New insights from fNIRS brain imaging. Brain and Language, 121(2), 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Picton, T., Rodriguez, R. T., Linden, R. D., & Maiste, A. C. (1985). The neurophysiology of human hearing. Human Communication Canada, 9, 127–136.Google Scholar

Pinti, P., Tachtsidis, I., Hamilton, A., et al. (2020). The present and future use of functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for cognitive neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1464(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pliatsikas, C. (2020). Understanding structural plasticity in the bilingual brain: The Dynamic Restructuring Model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(2), 459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poldrack, R. A., Mumford, J. A., & Nichols, T. E. (2011). Handbook of Functional MRI Data Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poline, J.-B. & Brett, M. (2012). The general linear model and fMRI: Does love last forever? NeuroImage, 62(2), 871–880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Raizada, R. D. S., Tsao, F.-M., Liu, H.-M., et al. (2010). Linking brain-wide multivoxel activation patterns to behaviour: Examples from language and math. NeuroImage, 51(1), 462–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reetzke, R., Gnanateja, G. N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2021). Neural tracking of the speech envelope is differentially modulated by attention and language experience. Brain and Language, 213, 104891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reetzke, R., Xie, Z., Llanos, F., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2018). Tracing the trajectory of sensory plasticity across different stages of speech learning in adulthood. Current Biology, 28(9), 1419–1427, e1–e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ressel, V., Pallier, C., Ventura-Campos, N., et al. (2012). An effect of bilingualism on the auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(47), 16597–16601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rimmele, J. M., Zion Golumbic, E., Schröger, E., & Poeppel, D. (2015). The effects of selective attention and speech acoustics on neural speech-tracking in a multi-talker scene. Cortex, 68, 144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodriguez-Fornells, A., van der Lugt, A., Rotte, M., et al. (2005). Second language interferes with word production in fluent bilinguals: Brain potential and functional imaging evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(3), 422–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosen, S., Carlyon, R. P., Darwin, C. J., & Russell, I. J. (1992). Temporal information in speech: Acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 336(1278), 367–373.Google ScholarPubMed

Saba, L. (2016). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Saliba, J., Bortfeld, H., Levitin, D. J., & Oghalai, J. S. (2016). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for neuroimaging in cochlear implant recipients. Hearing Research, 338, 64–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270(5234), 303–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Skoe, E., Burakiewicz, E., Figueiredo, M., & Hardin, M. (2017). Basic neural processing of sound in adults is influenced by bilingual experience. Neuroscience, 349, 278–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Skoe, E. & Kraus, N. (2010). Auditory brainstem response to complex sounds: A tutorial. Ear and Hearing, 31(3), 302–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Song, J. & Iverson, P. (2018). Listening effort during speech perception enhances auditory and lexical processing for non-native listeners and accents. Cognition, 179, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stilp, C. E. (2020). Evaluating peripheral versus central contributions to spectral context effects in speech perception. Hearing Research, 392, 107983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sugiura, L., Ojima, S., Matsuba-Kurita, H., et al. (2015). Effects of sex and proficiency in second language processing as revealed by a large-scale fNIRS study of school-aged children. Human Brain Mapping, 36(10), 3890–3911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sussman, E., Kujala, T., Halmetoja, J., et al. (2004). Automatic and controlled processing of acoustic and phonetic contrasts. Hearing Research, 190(1), 128–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tadel, F., Baillet, S., Mosher, J. C., Pantazis, D., & Leahy, R. M. (2011). Brainstorm: A user-friendly application for MEG/EEG. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 879716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tamminen, H., Peltola, M. S., Toivonen, H., Kujala, T., & Näätänen, R. (2013). Phonological processing differences in bilinguals and monolinguals. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(1), 8–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Teng, X., Tian, X., Rowland, J., & Poeppel, D. (2017). Concurrent temporal channels for auditory processing: Oscillatory neural entrainment reveals segregation of function at different scales. PLoS Biology, 15(11), e2000812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tourville, J. A. & Guenther, F. H. (2011). The DIVA model: A neural theory of speech acquisition and production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(7), 952–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, Y., Sereno, J. A., Jongman, A., & Hirsch, J. (2003). FMRI evidence for cortical modification during learning of Mandarin lexical tone. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(7), 1019–1027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Winkler, I., Kujala, T., Tiitinen, H., et al. (1999). Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. Psychophysiology, 36(5), 638–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolfe, J. M., Kluender, K. R., Levi, D. M., et al. (2006). Sensation & Perception. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Wong, P. C. M., Perrachione, T. K., & Parrish, T. B. (2007). Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults. Human Brain Mapping, 28(10), 995–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Worden, F. G. & Marsh, J. T. (1968). Frequency-following (microphonic-like) neural responses evoked by sound. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 25(1), 42–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Xie, S., Wu, D., Yang, J., et al. (2021). An fNIRS examination of executive function in bilingual young children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(3), 516–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yeung, M. K. (2021). An optical window into brain function in children and adolescents: A systematic review of functional near-infrared spectroscopy studies. NeuroImage, 227, 117672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yi, H. G., Leonard, M. K., & Chang, E. F. (2019). The encoding of speech sounds in the superior temporal gyrus. Neuron, 102(6), 1096–1110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zinszer, B. D., Chen, P., Wu, H., Shu, H., & Li, P. (2015). Second language experience modulates neural specialization for first language lexical tones. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 33, 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zinszer, B. D., Yuan, Q., Zhang, Z., Chandrasekaran, B., & Guo, T. (2022). Continuous speech tracking in bilinguals reflects adaptation to both language and noise. Brain and Language, 230, 105128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed