Agbetsoamedo, Yvonne and Di Garbo, Francesca, 2015. Unravelling temperature terms in Sɛlɛɛ. In Koptjevskaja-Tamm, (ed.), pp. 107–127.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Aleksandra Y., 2009. ‘Eating’, ‘drinking’ and ‘smoking’: A generic verb and its semantics in Manambu. In Newman, John (ed.), The Linguistics of Eating and Drinking, pp. 91–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Akhunzada, Fakhruddin and Liljegren, Maarit, 2009. Kalkatak: A Crossroads of Cultures in Chitral. FLI Language and Culture Series, vol. 4. Islamabad: Forum for Language Initiatives.Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix K., 2006. Grammars in contact in the Volta Basin (West Africa): On contact induced grammatical change in Likpe. In Aikhenvald, Aleksandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds), Grammars in Contact: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, pp. 114–142. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix K., 2011. ‘When I die don’t cry’: The ethnopragmatics of ‘gratitude’ in West African languages. In Goddard, Cliff (ed.), Ethnopragmatics: Understanding Discourse in Natural Context, pp. 231–266. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix K., 2015. ‘Hard sun, hot weather, skin pain’: The cultural semantics of temperature expressions in Ewe and Likpe (West Africa). In Koptjevskaja-Tamm, (ed.), pp. 43–72.Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix K. and Breedveld, Anneke, 2004. Areal cultural scripts for social interaction in West African communities. Intercultural Pragmatics 1 (2): 167–187.Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix K. and Wilkins, David P., 1996. Semantics. In Goebl, Hans, Nelde, Peter H., Starý, Zdeněk and Wölck, Wolfgang (eds), Contact Linguistics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, pp. 130–138. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Austin, Peter, Ellis, Robert and Hercus, Luise, 1976. ‘Fruit of the eyes’: Semantic diffusion in the Lakes languages of South Australia. Papers in Australian Linguistics 10: 51–77.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, 1998. Phasal adverbials. In van der Auwera, Johan (ed.) with Ó Baoill, Dónall P., Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, pp. 25–145. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, 2011. Standard Average European. In Kortmann, Bernd and van der Auwera, Johan (eds), The Languages and Linguistics of Europe: A Comprehensive Guide, pp. 291–306. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Baart, Joan L. G., 1999. A Sketch of Kalam Kohistani Grammar. Studies in Languages of Northern Pakistan, vol. 5. Islamabad: National Institute of Pakistan Studies and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Baart, Joan L. G., 2003. Tonal features in languages of Northern Pakistan. In Baart, Joan L. G. and Sindhi, Ghulam Hyder (eds), Pakistani Languages and Society: Problems and Prospects, pp. 132–144. Islamabad and High Wycombe: National Institute of Pakistan Studies, Quaid-i-Azam University and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Bashir, Elena, 1996. The areal position of Khowar: South Asian and other affinities. In Bashir, Elena and Israr-ud-Din, (eds), Proceedings of the Second International Hindukush Cultural Conference, pp. 167–179. Hindukush and Karakoram Studies, vol. 1. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bashir, Elena, 2003. Dardic. In Cardona, George and Jain, Danesh (eds), The Indo-Aryan Languages, pp. 818–894. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bashir, Elena, 2009. Wakhi. In Windfuhr, Gernot (ed.), The Iranian Languages, pp. 825–862. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Berger, Hermann, 1998. Die Burushaski-Sprache von Hunza und Nager, vol. 1: Grammatik. Neuindische Studien, vol. 13. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar and Nichols, Johanna, 2006. Oceania, the Pacific Rim, and the theory of linguistic areas. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 32: 3–15.Google Scholar

Bielmeier, Roland, 1985. Das Märchen vom Prinzen Čobzaṅ: Eine tibetische Erzählung aus Baltistan: Text, Übersetzung, Grammatik und Westtibetisch vergleichendes Glossar. Beiträge zur Tibetischen Erzählforschung, vol. 6. Sankt Augustin: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert, 2011. ‘Eye of the day’: A response to Urban (2010). Oceanic Linguistics 50 (2): 524–535.Google Scholar

Boyeldieu, Pascal, 2008. From semantic change to polysemy: The cases of ‘meat/animal’ and ‘drink’. In Vanhove, (ed.), pp. 303–315.Google Scholar

Brown, Cecil, 2011. The role of Nahuatl in the formation of Mesoamerica as a linguistic area. Language Dynamics and Change 1: 171–204.Google Scholar

Cacopardo, Alberto M. and Cacopardo, Augusto S., 2001. Gates of Peristan: History, Religion and Society in the Hindu Kush. Reports and Memoirs, vol. 5. Rome: IsIAO.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard, 2013. Numeral bases. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/131Google Scholar

Croft, William, 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar

Edelberg, Lennart and Jones, Schuyler, 1979. Nuristan. Graz: Akadem. Druck- u. Verlagsanst.Google Scholar

Edelman, Dzhoi Iosifovna, 1980. K substratnomu naslediju Central’no-Asiatskogo jazykogo sojuza [Towards the substrate heritage of the Central Asian Sprachbund]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 5: 21–32.Google Scholar

Edelman, Dzhoi Iosifovna, 1983. The Dardic and Nuristani Languages, translated from Russian by Tsipan, E. H.. Moscow: Nauka, Central Department of Oriental Literature.Google Scholar

Enfield, Nicholas J. (ed.), 2003. Linguistic Epidemiology: Semantics and Grammar of Language Contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar

Enfield, Nicholas J., 2011. Taste in two tongues: A Southeast Asian study of semantic convergence. In Majid, Asifa and Levinson, Stephen C. (eds), The Senses in Language and Culture, pp. 30–37. Special issue of The Senses and Society 6 (1).Google Scholar

Epps, Patience, 2013. Inheritance, calquing or independent innovation? Reconstructing morphological complexity in Amazonian numerals. Journal of Language Contact 6: 329–357.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas, 1992. Multiple semiotic systems, hyperpolysemy, and the reconstruction of semantic change in Australian languages. In Austin, Peter, Dixon, R. M. W., Dutton, Tom and White, Isobel (eds), Language and History: Essays in Honour of Luise A. Hercus, pp. 137–155. Pacific Linguistics, vol. C-116. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas and Wilkins, David P., 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76: 546–592.Google Scholar

François, Alexandre, 2008. Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In Vanhove, (ed.), pp. 163–215.Google Scholar

François, Alexandre, 2010. Des valeurs en héritage: Les isomorphismes sémantiques et la reconstruction des langues. In Choi-Jonin, Injoo, Duval, Marc and Soutet, Olivier (eds), Typologie et comparatisme, pp. 129–145. Orbis-Supplementa, vol. 29. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar

Gast, Volker and van der Auwera, Johan, 2012. What is contact-induced grammaticalization? Evidence from Mayan and Mixe-Zoquean languages. In Wiemer, Björn, Wälchli, Bernhard and Hansen, Björn (eds), Grammatical Replication and Borrowability in Language Contact, pp. 381–426. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Gil, David, 2015. The Mekong-Mamberamo linguistic area. In Enfield, Nicholas and Comrie, Bernard (eds), The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, pp. 266–355. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 649. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin and Tadmor, Uri (eds), 2009. Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hayward, Richard J., 1991. A propos patterns of lexicalization in the Ethiopian language area. In Mendel, Daniela and Claudi, Ulrike (eds), Ägypten im afro-orientalischen Kontext, pp. 139–156. Special issue of Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere. Köln: Institute of African Studies.Google Scholar

Hayward, Richard J., 2000. Is there a metric for convergence? In Renfrew, Colin, McMahon, April and Trask, R. L. (eds), Time Depth in Historical Linguistics, pp. 621–640. Papers in the Prehistory of Languages, vol. 2. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania, 2003. On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27 (3): 529–572.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania, 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Leyew, Zelealem, 2008. Is Africa a linguistic area? In Heine, Bernd and Nurse, Derek (eds), A Linguistic Geography of Africa, pp. 15–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, 2011. Linguistic typology and language contact. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, pp. 568–590. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (ed.), 2015. The Linguistics of Temperature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Divjak, Dagmar and Rakhilina, Ekaterina V., 2010. Aquamotion verbs in Slavic and Germanic: A case study in lexical typology. In Hasko, Victoria and Perelmutter, Renee (eds), New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion, pp. 315–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. and Vanhove, Martine, 2015. The semantics of lexical typology. In Riemer, Nick (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, pp. 434–454. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Koul, Omkar N., 2003. Kashmiri. In Cardona, George and Jain, Danesh (eds), The Indo-Aryan Languages, pp. 895–952. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

List, Johann-Mattis, Mayer, Thomas, Terhalle, Anselm and Urban, Matthias, 2014. Database of Cross-Linguistic Colexifications, Version 1.0. Marburg: Forschungszentrum Deutscher Sprachatlas. http://CLICS.lingpy.orgGoogle Scholar

Majid, Asifa, Gullberg, Marianne, van Staden, Miriam and Bowerman, Melissa, 2007. How similar are semantic categories in closely related languages? A comparison of cutting and breaking in four Germanic languages. In Majid, Asifa and Bowerman, Melissa (eds), Cutting and Breaking Events: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, pp. 179–194. Special issue of Cognitive Linguistics 18 (2).Google Scholar

Markan, LaRaw, 1979. A dictionary of modern Jinghpaw. Unpublished manuscript, quoted in Matisoff (2004).Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A., 1978. Variational Semantics in Tibeto-Burman: The ‘Organic’ Approach to Linguistic Comparison. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A., 2004. Areal semantics: Is there such a thing? In Saxena, Anju (ed.), Himalayan Languages: Past and Present, pp. 347–393. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron and Sakel, Jeanette, 2007. Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence, Studies in Language 31: 829–865.Google Scholar

Morgenstierne, Georg, 1942. Notes on Dameli: A Kafir-Dardic dialect of Chitral. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 12: 115–198.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna, 1995. The spread of language around the Pacific Rim. Evolutionary Anthropology 3: 206–215.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna and Petterson, David A., 1996. The Amerind personal pronouns. Language 72: 336–371.Google Scholar

Noonan, Michael, 2003. Recent language contact in the Nepal Himalaya. In Bradley, David, LaPolla, Randy, Michailovsky, Boyd and Thurgood, Graham (eds), Language Variation: Papers on Variation and Change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in Honour of James A. Matisoff, pp. 65–87. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Pardeshi, Prashant, Hook, Peter, Masica, Colin P. et al., 2006. Toward a geotypology of EAT-expressions in the languages of Asia: Visualizing areal patterns through WALS. Gengo Kenkyu 130: 89–108.Google Scholar

Parkin, Robert, 1987. Kin classification in the Karakorum. Man 22 (1): 157–170.Google Scholar

Perder, Emil, 2013. A Grammatical Description of Dameli. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar

Piirainen, Elisabeth, 2012. Widespread Idioms in Europe and Beyond: Toward a Lexicon of Common Figurative Units. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Read, Alfred F. C., 1934. Balti Grammar. London: James G. Forlong Fund.Google Scholar

Ricca, Davide, 1993. I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 2007. Calquing and metatypy. Journal of Language Contact 1 (1): 116–143.Google Scholar

Schapper, Antoinette, 2015. Temperature terms in Kamang and Abui, two Papuan languages of the Timor-Alor-Pantar family. In Koptjevskaja-Tamm, (ed.), pp. 860–887.Google Scholar

Schapper, Antoinette, San Roque, Lila and Hendery, Rachel, 2016. Tree, firewood and fire in the languages of Sahul. In Juvonen, Päivi and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (eds), The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts, pp. 355–422. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Ruth Laila and Kohistani, Razwal, 2008. A Grammar of the Shina Language of Indus Kohistan. Beiträge zur Kenntnis Südasiatischer Sprachen und Literaturen, vol. 17. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Smith-Stark, Thomas C., 1994. Mesoamerican calques. In MacKay, Carolyn J. and Vásques, Verónica (eds), Investigaciones lingüísticas en Mesoamérica, pp. 15–50. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar

Steingass, Francis Joseph, 2000. A Comprehensive Persian, English Dictionary: Including the Arabic Words and Phrases to Be Met with in Persian Literature Being Johnson and Richardson’s Persian, Arabic and English Dictionary. Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publications.Google Scholar

Strand, Richard F., 2013. Richard Strand’s Nuristân Site: Lexicons of Kâmviri, Khowar, and Other Hindu-Kush Languages. http://nuristan.info/lngFrameL.htmlGoogle Scholar

Sweetser, Eve, 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tent, Jan, 1998. The structure of deictic day-name systems. Studia Linguistica 52 (2): 112–148.Google Scholar

Tikkanen, Bertil, 1999. Archaeological-linguistic correlations in the formation of retroflex typologies and correlating areal features in South Asia. In Blench, Roger (ed.), Archaeology and Language, pp. 138–148. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Tikkanen, Bertil, 2008. Some areal phonological isoglosses in the transit zone between South and Central Asia. In Israr-ud-Din, (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Hindu Kush Cultural Conference, pp. 250–262. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Toporov, Vladimir Nikolayevich, 1970. About the phonological typology of Burushaski. In Jakobson, Roman and Kawamoto, Shigeo (eds), Studies in General and Oriental Linguistics Presented to Shiro Hattori on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, pp. 632–647. Tokyo: TEC Corporation for Language and Educational Research.Google Scholar

Trail, Ronald L. and Cooper, Gregory R., 1999. Kalasha Dictionary with English and Urdu. Islamabad and High Wycombe: National Institute of Pakistan Studies, Quaid-i-Azam University and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Treis, Yvonne, 2010. Perception verbs and taste adjectives in Kambaata and beyond. In Storch, Anne (ed.), Perception of the Invisible: Religion, Historical Semantics and the Role of Perceptive Verbs, pp. 313–346. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika, vol. 21. Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar

Sir Turner, Ralph Lilley, 1966. A Comparative Dictionary of the Indo-Aryan Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Urban, Matthias, 2009. ‘Sun’ and ‘moon’ in the Circum-Pacific language area. Anthropological Linguistics 51 (3/4): 328–346.Google Scholar

Urban, Matthias, 2010. ‘Sun’ = ‘Eye of the day’: A linguistic pattern of Southeast Asia and Oceania. Oceanic Linguistics 49 (2): 568–579.Google Scholar

Urban, Matthias, 2012. Analyzability and Semantic Associations in Referring Expressions: A Study in Comparative Lexicology. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar

Vanhove, Martine (ed.), 2008a. From Polysemy to Semantic Change: Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Vanhove, Martine, 2008b. Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Vanhove, (ed.), pp. 341–370.Google Scholar

Viberg, Åke, 1984. The verbs of perception: A typological study. In Butterworth, Brian, Comrie, Bernard and Dahl, Östen (eds), Explanations for Language Universals, pp. 123–162. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar

Wälchli, Bernhard, 2005. Co-Compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wälchli, Bernhard, 2009. Motion Events in Parallel Texts. Habilitationsschrift, Philosophisch-historische Fakultät der Universität Bern.Google Scholar

Wälchli, Bernhard, 2015. Co-compounds. In Müller, Peter O., Ohnheiser, Ingeborg, Olsen, Susan and Rainer, Franz (eds), Word Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, vol. 1, pp. 707–726. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel, 1953. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York. Reprinted 1963, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Willson, Stephen R., 1999. Basic Burushaski Vocabulary. Islamabad and High Wycombe: National Institute of Pakistan Studies, Quaid-i-Azam University and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Wohlgemuth, Jan, 2009. A Typology of Verbal Borrowings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Zalizniak, Anna A., 2008. A catalogue of semantic shifts: Towards a typology of semantic derivation. In Vanhove, (ed.), pp. 217–238.Google Scholar

Zalizniak, Anna A., Bulakh, Maria, Ganenkov, Dmitrij et al., 2012. The catalogue of semantic shifts as a database for lexical semantic typology. In Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria and Vanhove, Martine (eds), New Directions in Lexical Typology, pp. 633–669. Special issue of Linguistics 50 (3).Google Scholar

Zemp, Marius, 2013. A Historical Grammar of the Tibetan Dialect spoken in Kargil (Purik). PhD Dissertation, University of Bern.Google Scholar