Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Applied School Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Applied School Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Contributor Biographies
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Broadening the Focus of School Psychology Practice
- Part I Individual-Level Academic Interventions
- Part II Teacher- and System-Level Interventions
- Part III Interventions from Educational and Social/Personality Psychology
- Part IV Behavioral and Social-Emotional Interventions
- 19 Internalizing Problems and Disorders of Childhood
- 20 Adolescent Suicidal Behavior in Schools: What to Know and What to Do
- 21 Emotional Disturbance versus Social Maladjustment
- 22 Autism Spectrum Disorder and Illegal Acts
- 23 Effective Bullying Prevention and Intervention Strategies for School Professionals
- 24 Principles of Prevention and Intervention to Close Discipline Gaps in Schools
- 25 Social and Emotional Learning in Schools
- Part V Health and Pediatric Interventions
- Part VI Family Connections and Life Transitions
- Part VII Special Populations
- Part VIII Conclusion
- Index
- References
25 - Social and Emotional Learning in Schools
from Part IV - Behavioral and Social-Emotional Interventions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Applied School Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Applied School Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Contributor Biographies
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Broadening the Focus of School Psychology Practice
- Part I Individual-Level Academic Interventions
- Part II Teacher- and System-Level Interventions
- Part III Interventions from Educational and Social/Personality Psychology
- Part IV Behavioral and Social-Emotional Interventions
- 19 Internalizing Problems and Disorders of Childhood
- 20 Adolescent Suicidal Behavior in Schools: What to Know and What to Do
- 21 Emotional Disturbance versus Social Maladjustment
- 22 Autism Spectrum Disorder and Illegal Acts
- 23 Effective Bullying Prevention and Intervention Strategies for School Professionals
- 24 Principles of Prevention and Intervention to Close Discipline Gaps in Schools
- 25 Social and Emotional Learning in Schools
- Part V Health and Pediatric Interventions
- Part VI Family Connections and Life Transitions
- Part VII Special Populations
- Part VIII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Although parents and educators have identified student social and emotional development as an important educational outcome, this domain has not received as much emphasis in educational policy or practice as academic achievement. Recognition of the contributions of social and emotional learning (SEL) to students’ social and academic success, however, has increased interest in promoting SEL in schools over the last decade. This chapter begins with a brief introduction to SEL constructs and definitions, followed by a synopsis of current SEL assessment and intervention practices. We also highlight the current state of empirical evidence for these practices and then turn to several important necessary future directions to advance school-based SEL practices.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Applied School Psychology , pp. 428 - 450Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2013). 2013 CASEL guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs: Preschool and elementary school edition. Chicago, IL: Author. Retrieved from www.casel.org/preschool-and-elementary-edition-casel-guide/Google Scholar
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2015). 2015 CASEL guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs: Middle and high school edition. Chicago, IL: Author. Retrieved from http://secondaryguide.casel.org/Google Scholar
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2019a). Core SEL competencies. Retrieved from www.casel.org/core-competencies/Google Scholar
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2019b). Approaches. Retrieved from www.casel.org/what-is-sel/approaches/Google Scholar
Institute for Education Sciences. (n.d.). What works clearinghouse; Behavior. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/FWW/Results?filters=,BehaviorGoogle Scholar
References
Bear, G. G. (2010). School discipline and self-discipline: A practical guide to promoting student prosocial behavior. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Becker, K. D., Darney, D., Domitrovich, C., Keperling, J. P., & Ialongo, N. S. (2013). Supporting universal prevention programs: A two-phased coaching model. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 16, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-013-0134-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beets, M. W., Flay, B. R., Vuchinich, S., et al. (2009). Use of a social and character development program to prevent substance use, violent behaviors, and sexual activity among elementary-school students in Hawaii. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1438–1445. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.142919CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bierman, K. L., Domitrovich, C. E., Nix, R. L., et al. (2008). Promoting academic and social-emotional school readiness: The Head Start REDI Program. Child Development, 79, 1802–1817. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01227.xGoogle Scholar
Blad, E. (2015). Survey: Student success calls for more than academic skills. Education Week. Retrieved from www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/06/10/survey-student-success-calls-for-more-than.htmlGoogle Scholar
Blad, E. (2016, Aug 1). Social-emotional learning: States collaborate to craft standards, policies. Education Week Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/rulesforengagement/2016/08/social-emotional_learning_states_collaborate_to_craft_standards_policies.html#commentsGoogle Scholar
Briesch, A. M., Chafouleas, S. M., & Riley-Tillman, T. C. (2010). Generalizability and dependability of behavior assessment methods to estimate academic engagement: A comparison of systematic direct observation and Direct Behavior Rating. School Psychology Review, 39, 408–421.Google Scholar
Brown, E. C., Low, S., Smith, B. H., & Haggerty, K. P. (2011). Outcomes from a school-randomized controlled trial of Steps to Respect: A bullying prevention program, School Psychology Review, 40, 423–443.Google Scholar
Caemmerer, J. M., & Keith, T. Z. (2015). Longitudinal, reciprocal effects of social skills and achievement from kindergarten to eighth grade. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.05.001Google Scholar
Castro-Olivo, S. M., Cramer, K., & Garcia, N. M. (2016). Manualized school-based social-emotional curricula for ethnic minority populations. In Graves, S. L. & Blake, J. J. (Eds.), Psychoeducational assessment and intervention for ethnic minority children: Evidence-based approaches (pp. 183–196). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14855-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafouleas, S. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Christ, T. J. (2009). Direct Behavior Rating (DBR): an emerging method for assessing social behavior within a tiered intervention system. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508409340391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafouleas, S. M., Sanetti, L. M. H., Kilgus, S. P., & Maggin, D. M. (2012). Evaluating sensitivity to behavioral change across consultation cases using Direct Behavior Rating Single-Item Scales (DBR-SIS). Exceptional Children, 78, 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800406Google Scholar
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45, 283–292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16656615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2013). 2013 CASEL guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs: Preschool and elementary school edition. Chicago, IL: Author. Retrieved from www.casel.org/preschool-and-elementary-edition-casel-guide/Google Scholar
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2015). 2015 CASEL guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs: Middle and high school edition. Chicago, IL: Author. Retrieved from http://secondaryguide.casel.org/Google Scholar
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2019a). Core SEL competencies. Retrieved from www.casel.org/core-competencies/Google Scholar
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2019b). Approaches. Retrieved from www.casel.org/what-is-sel/approaches/Google Scholar
Committee for Children. (1992). Second Step: A violence prevention curriculum (2nd ed.). Seattle, WA: Author.Google Scholar
Committee for Children. (2001). Steps to Respect: A bullying prevention program. Seattle, WA: Author.Google Scholar
Crowe, L. M., Beauchamp, M. H., Catroppa, C., & Anderson, V. (2011). Social function assessment tools for children and adolescents: A systematic review from 1988 to 2010. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 767–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.008Google Scholar
Denham, S. A. (2015). Assessment of SEL in educational contexts. In Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Gullotta, T. P. (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 285–319). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Desai, P., Karahalios, V., Persuad, S., & Reker, K. (2014). A social justice perspective on social-emotional learning. Communique: National Association of School Psychologists, 43, 14–16.Google Scholar
DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Bellinger, J., & Cheng, W. (2015). Efficacy of the Social Skills Improvement System Classwide Intervention Program (SSIS-CIP) primary version. School Psychology Quarterly, 30, 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000079Google Scholar
DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Bellinger, J., & Cheng, W. (2016). Effects of a universal positive classroom behavior program on student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 53, 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21891Google Scholar
Domitrovich, C., Bradshaw, C., Greenberg, M., Embry, D., Poduska, J., & Ialongo, N. (2010). Integrated models of school-based prevention: Logic and theory. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20452CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44, 237–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15584327Google Scholar
Durlak, J. A. (2015). Studying program implementation is not easy but it is essential. Prevention Science, 16, 1123–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0606-3Google Scholar
Durlak, J. A., Taylor, R. D., Kawashima, K., et al. (2007). Effects of positive youth development programs on school, family, and community systems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9112-5Google Scholar
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.xGoogle Scholar
Dusenberry, L., Weissberg, R. P., Goren, P., & Domitrovich, C. (2014). State standards to advance social and emotional learning. Findings from CASEL’s state scan of social and emotional learning standards, preschool – high school, 2014. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic Social and Emotional Learning.Google Scholar
Elliott, S. N., Frey, J. R., & Davies, M. (2015). Systems for assessing and improving students’ social skills to achieve academic competence. In Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Gullotta, T. P. (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 301–319). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (2007). Social Skills Improvement System: Classwide Intervention Program. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
Evans, R., Murphy, S., & Scourfield, J. (2015). Implementation of a school-based social and emotional learning intervention: Understanding diffusion processes within complex systems. Prevention Science, 16, 754–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0552-0Google Scholar
Flay, B. R., Allred, C. G., & Ordway, N. (2001). Effects of the Positive Action Program on achievement and discipline: Two matched-control comparisons. Prevention Science, 2, 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011591613728Google Scholar
Fleischman, S., Scott, C., & Sargrad, S. (2016). Better evidence, better choices, better schools: State supports for evidence-based school improvement and the Every Student Succeeds Act. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Retrieved from www.americanprogress.org/issues/education/reports/2016/08/31/143223/better-evidence-better-choices-better-schools/Google Scholar
Frey, J. R., Elliott, S. N., & Miller, C. F. (2014). Best practices in social skills training. In Thomas, A. & Harrison, P. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology – Student level services (pp. 213–224). Bethesda, MD: National Association for School Psychologists.Google Scholar
Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston, MA: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology, Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 38, 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., et al. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58, 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.6-7.466CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gresham, F. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & Hallahan, D. P. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467–519). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (2008). Social Skills Improvement System – Rating Scales. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (2017). Social Skills Improvement System Social-Emotional Learning Edition. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
Gresham, F., Elliott, S., Metallo, S., et al. (2018). Psychometric fundamentals of the Social Skills Improvement System Social-Emotional Learning Edition Rating Forms. Assessment for Effective Intervention. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418808598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griggs, M. S., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Merritt, E. G., & Patton, C. L. (2013). The Responsive Classroom approach and fifth grade students’ math and science anxiety and self-efficacy. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000026Google Scholar
Haggerty, K., Elgin, J., & Woolley, A. (2011). Social-emotional learning assessment measures for middle school youth. Seattle, WA: Social Development Research Group, University of Washington, Commissioned by the Raikes Foundation. Retrieved from www.search-institute.org/sites/default/files/a/DAP-Raikes-Foundation-Review.pdfGoogle Scholar
Halle, T. G., & Darling-Churchill, K. E. (2016). Review of measures of social and emotional development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 45, 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.02.003Google Scholar
Hazel, C. (2016). Empowered learning in secondary schools: Promoting positive youth development through a multi-tiered system of supports. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14896-000Google Scholar
Hoffman, D. M. (2009). Reflecting on social emotional learning: A critical perspective on trends in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 79, 533–556. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325184Google Scholar
Humphrey, N., Kalambouka, A., Wigelsworth, M., Lendrum, A., Deighton, J., & Wolpert, M. (2011). Measures of social and emotional skills for children and young people: A systematic review. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410382896Google Scholar
Jenkins, L. N., Demaray, M. K., Smit Wren, N., et al. (2014). A critical review of five commonly used social-emotional and behavioral screeners for elementary or secondary schools. Contemporary School Psychology, 18, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-014-0026-6Google Scholar
Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Hoglund, W. L. G., & Aber, J. L. (2010). A school-randomized clinical trial of an integrated social-emotional learning and literacy intervention: Impacts after 1 school year. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 829–842. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021383Google Scholar
Jones, S. M., Zaslow, M., Darling-Churchill, K. E., & Halle, T. G. (2016). Assessing early childhood social and emotional development: Key conceptual and measurement issues. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 45, 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.02.008Google Scholar
Kam, C. M., Greenberg, M. T., & Walls, C. T. (2003). Examining the role of implementation quality in school-based prevention using the PATHS curriculum. Prevention Science, 4, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021786811186Google Scholar
Kusche, C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1994). The PATHS curriculum. Seattle, WA: Developmental Research and Programs.Google Scholar
Lendrum, A., Humphrey, N., & Wigelsworth, M. (2013). Social and emotional aspects of learning (SEAL) for secondary schools: Implementation difficulties and their implications for school-based mental health promotion. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 18, 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12006Google Scholar
Low, S., Smolkowski, K., & Cook, C. (2016). What constitutes high-quality implementation of SEL programs? A latent class analysis of Second Step implementation. Prevention Science, 17, 981–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0670-3Google Scholar
Malecki, C. K., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). Children’s social behaviors as predictors of academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.17.1.1.19902Google Scholar
Masten, A. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2010). Developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000222Google Scholar
McGoey, K. E., Rispoli, K. M., Venesky, L. G., et al. (2014). A preliminary investigation into teacher perceptions of the barriers to behavior intervention implementation. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 30, 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2014.950441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKevitt, B. C. (2012). School psychologists’ knowledge and use of evidence-based, social-emotional learning interventions. Contemporary School Psychology, 16, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKown, C. (2015). Challenges and opportunities in the direct assessment of children’s social and emotional comprehension. In Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Gullotta, T. P. (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 320–335). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Merrell, K. W., & Gueldner, B. A. (2010). Social and emotional learning in the classroom: Promoting mental health and academic success. London, England: Guilford.Google Scholar
Merriweather, T. R. (2016). Multicultural education is/as/in prosocial education. In Brown, P. M., Corrigan, M. W., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (Eds.), Handbook of prosocial education (pp. 635–664). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Miller, F. G., Patwa, S., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2014). Using direct behavior rating–single item scales to assess student behavior within multi-tiered systems of support. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 27, 77–85.Google Scholar
Morningside Center for Teaching Social Responsibility (n.d.). Reading, Writing, Respect, and Resolution Program (4Rs). New York, NY: Author.Google Scholar
Nagle, R. J., & Gagnon, S. G. (2008). Best practices in planning and conducting needs assessment. In Thomas, A. & Grimes, J. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 2207–2223). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
National Association of School Psychologists. (2010). Model for comprehensive and integrated school psychological services. Bethesda, MD: Author.Google Scholar
National Association of School Psychologists. (2016). Ensuring high quality, comprehensive, and integrated specialized instructional support services [Position statement]. Bethesda, MD: Author.Google Scholar
Northeast Foundation for Children. (2007). Responsive classroom. Turner Falls, MA: Author.Google Scholar
Oberle, E., Domitrovich, C. E., Meyers, D. C., & Weissberg, R. P. (2016). Establishing systemic social and emotional learning approaches in schools: A framework for schoolwide implementation. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46, 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1125450Google Scholar
Perie, M., Marion, S., & Gong, B. (2009). Moving toward a comprehensive assessment system: A framework for considering interim assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00149.xGoogle Scholar
Phi Delta Kappan. (2016). Why school? The 48th annual PDK poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Bloomington, IN: PDK International.Google Scholar
Riley-Tillman, T. C., Chafouleas, S. M., Sassu, K. A., Chanese, J. A. M., & Glazer, A. D. (2008). Examining the agreement of Direct Behavior Ratings and Systematic Direct Observation for on-task and disruptive behavior. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 10, 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300707312542Google Scholar
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Fan, X., Chiu, Y. J., & You, W. (2007). The contribution of the Responsive Classroom approach on children’s academic achievement: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Larsen, R. A. A., Baroody, A. E., et al. (2014). Efficacy of the Responsive Classroom approach: Results from a 3-year, longitudinal randomized controlled trial. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 567–603. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214523821Google Scholar
Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Lawlor, M. S. (2010). The effects of a mindfulness-based education program on pre- and early adolescents’ wellbeing and social and emotional competence. Mindfulness, 1, 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-010-0011-8Google Scholar
Shakman, K., & Rodriguez, S. M. (2015). Logic models for program design, implementation, and evaluation: Workshop toolkit (REL 2015–057). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, and Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabsGoogle Scholar
Strein, W., Hoagwood, K., & Cohn, A. (2003). School psychology: A public health perspective: I. Prevention, populations, and systems change. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(02)00142-5Google Scholar
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2002). Introduction to the special series on positive behavior support in schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266020100030101Google Scholar
US Department of Education. (2016). Non-regulatory guidance: Using evidence to strengthen education investments. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/guidanceuseseinvestment.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, S., & Swanson, E. A. (2015). Special education research advances knowledge in education. Exceptional Children, 82, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598781Google Scholar
Wanless, S. B., & Domitrovich, C. E. (2015). Readiness to implement school-based social-emotional learning interventions: Using research on factors related to implementation to maximize quality. Prevention Science, 16, 1037–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0612-5Google Scholar
Watson, M., & Battistich, V. (2006). Building and sustaining caring communities. In Evertson, C. M. & Weinstein, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 253–279). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Webster-Stratton, C., & Reid, M. J. (2004). Strengthening social and emotional competence in young children: The foundation for early school readiness and success: Incredible Years Classroom Social Skills and Problem-Solving Curriculum. Infants and Young Children, 17, 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001163-200404000-00002Google Scholar
Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M. J., & Stoolmiller, M. (2008). Preventing conduct problems and improving school readiness: Evaluation of the Incredible Years Teacher and Child Training Programs in high-risk schools. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01861.xGoogle Scholar
Weikart, D. P., Epstein, A. S., Schweinhart, L. J., & Bond, J. T. (1978). The Ypsilanti Preschool Curriculum Demonstration Project: Preschool years and longitudinal results through fourth grade (Monographs of the HighScope Educational Research Foundation, 4). Ypsilanti, MI: HighScope Press.Google Scholar
Wentzel, K. R. (1993). Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.357Google Scholar
Zins, J. E., Bloodworth, M. R., Weissberg, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). The scientific base linking social and emotional learning to school success. In Zins, J., Weissberg, R., Wang, M., & Walberg, H. (Eds.), Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar