Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:23:24.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Doing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2024

Edited by
Tracy C. Davis  and
Paul Rae
Tracy C. Davis
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Paul Rae
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Guide to Mixed Methods Research for Theatre and Performance Studies , pp. 123 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Allington, D., Brouillette, S., & Golumbia, D. (2016). ‘Neoliberal Tools (and Archives): A Political History of Digital Humanities’. Los Angeles Review of Books, 1 May.Google Scholar
Arnold, T., & Tilton, L. (2015). Humanities Data in R: Exploring Networks, Geospatial Data, Images, and Text. Cham: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bay-Cheng, S., Parker-Starbuck, J., & Saltz, D. Z. (2015). Performance and Media: Taxonomies for a Changing Field. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bench, H., & Elswit, K. (2022). ‘Visceral Data for Dance Histories: Katherine Dunham’s People, Places, and Pieces’. TDR: The Drama Review, 66(1), 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, G., Kemp, S., Toothman, N., & Buswell, E. (2016). ‘“A Whole Theatre of Others”: Amateur Acting and Immersive Spectatorship in the Digital Shakespeare Game Play the Knave’. Shakespeare Quarterly, 67(4), 408–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, J. (2016). ‘Data Models for Theatre Research: People, Places, and Performance’. Theatre Journal, 68(4), 615–32.Google Scholar
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Broadway League. (n.d.). ‘Internet Broadway Database’. Accessed 25 February 2023. www.ibdb.com.Google Scholar
Brown, L., & O’Connor, J., eds. (1978). Free, Adult, Uncensored: The Living History of the Federal Theatre Project. Washington, DC: New Republic Books.Google Scholar
Cahn, J., & Leighton, R. V. (1913). The Cahn–Leighton Official Theatrical Guide, vol. 17. New York: New Amsterdam Theatre Building.Google Scholar
D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. (2020). Data Feminism. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Hart, J. (1967). The Federal Theatre, 1935–1939: Plays, Relief, and Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Escobar Varela, M. (2021). Theatre as Data: Computational Journeys into Theatre Research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar Varela, M., & Hernández-Barraza, L. (2020). ‘Digital Dance Scholarship: Biomechanics and Culturally Situated Dance Analysis’. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 35(1), 160–75.Google Scholar
Escobar Varela, M., & Miller, D. (2002). ‘Rethinking the Canon through the Digital’. In Mantoan, L., Moore, M., & Farr Schiller, A., eds., Troubling Traditions: Canonicity, Theatre, and Performance in the US. New York: Routledge, pp. 245–56.Google Scholar
Folger Shakespeare Library. (n.d.). ‘Shakespeare’s Works’. Accessed 25 February 2023. https://shakespeare.folger.edu.Google Scholar
Fraden, R. (1994). Blueprints for a Black Federal Theatre, 1935–1939. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gitelman, L., ed. (2013). ‘Raw’ Data Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graban, T. S., Marty, P., Romano, A., & Vandegrift, M., eds. (2019). ‘Invisible Work in Digital Humanities’. Special issue, DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 13(2).Google Scholar
Guyot, S., & Ravel, J. S., eds. (2020). Databases, Revenues, and Repertory: The French Stage Online, 1680–1793. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Herbert, I. (1986). ‘Computer Databases for Theatre Studies’. New Theatre Quarterly, 2(6), 175–80.Google Scholar
Jockers, M. (2014). Text Analysis with R for Students of Literature. Cham: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as Theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
LOC (Library of Congress). (n.d.). ‘Collection: Federal Theatre Project, 1935 to 1939’. Accessed 25 February 2023. www.loc.gov/collections/federal-theatre-project-1935-to-1939/.Google Scholar
Losh, E., & Wernimont, J. (2019). Bodies of Information: Intersectional Feminism and the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, W. (2014). Humanities Computing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2016). ‘Average Broadway’. Theatre Journal, 68(4), 529–53.Google Scholar
Montfort, N. (2016). Exploratory Programming for the Arts and Humanities. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moore, C. (2017). The Federal Theatre Project in the American South: The Carolina Playmakers and the Quest for American Drama. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Osborne, E. A. (2011). Staging the People: Community and Identity in the Federal Theatre Project. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pearson, R., ed. (2007). ‘Victorian Plays Project’. Site discontinued as of February 2023. https://victorian.nuigalway.ie.Google Scholar
PH (Programming Historian). (2023). ‘Homepage’. https://programminghistorian.org/.Google Scholar
Rawson, K., & Muñoz, T. (2019). ‘Against Cleaning’. In Gold, M. K. & Klein, L. F., eds., Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Digital book, accessed 11 October 2023. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/projects/debates-in-the-digital-humanities-2019.Google Scholar
Risam, R. (2018). New Digital Worlds: Postcolonial Digital Humanities in Theory, Praxis, and Pedagogy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roh, D. S. (2019). ‘The DH Bubble: Startup Logic, Sustainability, and Performativity’. In Gold, M. K. & Klein, L. F., eds., Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Digital book, accessed 11 October 2023. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/projects/debates-in-the-digital-humanities-2019.Google Scholar
Tompkins, J. (2014). ‘Making the Invisible Visible: Virtual Stage Props and Christopher Marlowe’s Dr. Faustus’. In Schweitzer, M. & Zerdy, J., eds., Performing Objects and Theatrical Things. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 161–72.Google Scholar
Tufte, E. R. (2001). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. 2nd ed. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
Vareschi, M., & Burkert, M. (2016). ‘Archives, Numbers, Meaning: The Eighteenth-Century Playbill at Scale’. Theatre Journal, 68(4), 597–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witham, B. B. (2003). The Federal Theatre Project: A Case Study. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Anderson, D. A. (2017). ‘Personal interview with author’. New York, 11 January.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. A. (n.d.). ‘readwithjoy (blog)’. Last updated 27 February 2023. https://readwithjoy.tumblr.com/.Google Scholar
Babbage, F. H. (2016). ‘Active Audiences: Spectatorship as Research Practice’. Studies in Theatre and Performance, 36(1), 48–51.Google Scholar
Balzer, D. (2015). Curationism: How Curating Took Over the Art World and Everything Else. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
behindawhitemask. (n.d.). ‘Behind a White Mask (blog)’. Tumblr. Accessed 25 February 2023. https://behindawhitemask.tumblr.com/.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld-Jones, D. (2008). ‘Dance, Choreography, and Social Science Research’. In Knowles, J. G. & Cole, A. L., eds., Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 75–184.Google Scholar
Brown, A. S., Novak-Leonard, J. L., & Gilbride, S. (2011). Getting In on the Act: How Arts Groups Are Creating Opportunities for Active Participation. San Francisco, CA: James Irvine Foundation.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2003). ‘Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods’. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S., eds., Strategies for Qualitative Inquiry, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 249–91.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Cobb, E. M. (2022). ‘They Have Scorched the Snake (blog)’. Tumblr. Accessed 11 August 2023. https://scorchedthesnake.tumblr.com/.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. (1989). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Doyle, Maxine. (2013). ‘Interview with Julia M. Ritter, 10 October’. Transcript.Google Scholar
Eisner, E. (1982). Cognition and Curriculum: A Basis for Deciding What to Teach. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Fayard, A.-L. (2017). ‘Bricolage in the Field: Experimenting in Ethnography’. In Mir, R. & Jain, S., eds., The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Research in Organization Studies. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, pp. 141–53.Google Scholar
Finore, C. (2014). Personal interview with author. New York, 30 June.Google Scholar
Freshwater, H. (2009). Theatre and Audience. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heddon, D., Iball, H., & Zerihan, R. (2012). ‘Come Closer: Confessions of Intimate Spectators in One to One Performance’. Contemporary Theatre Review, 22(1), 120–33.Google Scholar
Knowles, J. G., & Cole, A. L., eds. (2008). Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Merriam, Sharan B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Reason, M., & Reynolds, D. (2010). ‘Kinesthesia, Empathy, and Related Pleasures: An Inquiry into Audience Experiences of Watching Dance’. Dance Research Journal, 42(2), 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, J. M. (2015). ‘Danse en tandem: Étude du mouvement des spectateurs et des performeurs dans Sleep No More de Punchdrunk’. La Revue Tangence: Revue d’Études Littéraires, 108, 51–76.Google Scholar
Ritter, J. M. (2016). ‘The Body of the Beholder: Insider Dynamics Transform Dance Spectatorship in Sleep No More’. In Frieze, J., ed., Reframing Immersive Theatre: The Politics and Pragmatics of Participatory Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Ritter, J. M. (2017). ‘Fandom and Punchdrunk’s Sleep No More: Audience Ethnography of Immersive Dance’. TDR: The Drama Review, 61(4), 59–77.Google Scholar
Ritter, J. M. (2021). Tandem Dances: Choreographing Immersive Performance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Thanem, T., & Knights, D. (2019). Embodied Research Methods. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Maanen, J. E. (2011). Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Asiedu, A. M. (2014). ‘Constructing Social Realities on Stage: Ebo Whyte at the Ghana National Theatre’. In Budde, A., ed., Fiebach: Theater. Wissen. Machen. Berlin: Verlag Theater der Zeit, pp. 67–72.Google Scholar
Asiedu, A. M. (2016). ‘“The Money Was Real Money”: Talking with Audiences about Corruption, Domestic Violence and Aesthetic Values during the Roverman Festival of Plays at the Ghana National Theatre’. Theatre Research International, 41(2), 151–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asiedu, A. M. (2022). ‘Audience Engagement and the Production of Efficacious Theatre: A Case Study from Ghana’. In Reason, M., Conner, L., Johanson, K., & Walmsley, B., eds., Routledge Companion to Audiences and the Performing Arts. London: Routledge, pp. 217–28.Google Scholar
Asiedu, A. M., Dorgbadzi, S., & Ekumah, E. (2011). ‘Language and Body in Performance: Working across Languages in the Ghanaian Production I Told You So’. Contemporary Theatre Review, 21(1), 50–9.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. (1997). Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freshwater, H. (2009). Theatre & Audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, K. (2013). ‘Listening to the Audience: Methods for a New Era of Audience Research’. In Radbourne, J., Glow, H., & Johanson, K., eds., Audience Experience. New York: Intellect, pp. 159–71.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2009). The Spectator and the Spectacle: Audiences in Modernity and Postmodernity. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sauter, W. (2000). ‘Theatre Talks: How to Find Out What the Spectator Thinks’. In Sauter, W., The Theatrical Event: Dynamics of Performance and Perception. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, pp. 174–86.Google Scholar
Sedgman, K. (2018). ‘Audience Experience in an Anti-Expert Age: A Survey of Theatre Audience Research’. Theatre Research International, 42(3), 307–22.Google Scholar

References

Asad, T. (1986). ‘The Concept of Cultural Translation in British Social Anthropology’. In Clifford, J. & Marcus, G. E., Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 141–64.Google Scholar
Bautista, J. (2019). The Way of the Cross: Suffering Selfhoods in the Roman Catholic Philippines. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Bautista, J., & Bräunlein, P. J. (2014). ‘Ethnography as an Act of Witnessing: Doing Fieldwork on Passion Rituals in the Philippines’. Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints, 62(3), 501–28.Google Scholar
Behar, R. (1996). The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology That Breaks Your Heart. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Bowman, G. (1997). ‘Radical Empiricism: Anthropological Fieldwork after Psychoanalysis and the “Année Sociologique”’. Anthropological Journal on European Cultures, 6(2), 79–107.Google Scholar
Cannell, F. (1995). ‘The Imitation of Christ in Bicol, Philippines’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 1, 377–94.Google Scholar
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E., eds. (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Conquergood, D. (1991). ‘Rethinking Ethnography: Towards a Critical Cultural Politics’. Communication Monographs, 58(2), 179–94.Google Scholar
Conquergood, D. (2002). ‘Performance Studies: Interventions and Radical Research’. TDR: The Drama Review, 46(2), 145–56.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cupitt, R. (2018). ‘We Have Never Been Digital Anthropologists’. Anthro{dendum} (blog), 3 February. Accessed 11 October 2023. https://anthrodendum.org/2018/02/03/we-have-never-been-digital-anthropologists/.Google Scholar
Desjarlais, R. R. (1992). Body and Emotion: The Aesthetics of Illness and Healing in the Nepal Himalayas. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Droogers, A., & Knibbe, K. (2011). ‘Methodological Ludism and the Academic Study of Religion’. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 23(3), 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1976 [1937]). Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Farrer, D. (2007). ‘The Perils and Pitfalls of Performance Ethnography’. International Sociological Association E-Bulletin, 6, 17–26.Google Scholar
Farrer, D. (2009). Shadows of the Prophet: Martial Arts and Sufi Mysticism. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gatt, C. (2015). ‘The Anthropologist as Ensemble Member: Anthropological Experiments with Theatre Makers’. In Flynn, A. & Tinius, J., eds., Anthropology, Theatre, and Development: The Transformative Potential of Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 334–56.Google Scholar
Gold, R. L. (1958). ‘Roles in Sociological Field Observations’. Social Forces, 36(3), 217–23.Google Scholar
Harrop, P., & Njaradi, D. (2013). Performance and Ethnography: Dance, Drama, Music. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Hastrup, K. (1995). A Passage to Anthropology: Between Experience and Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. D. (1989). Paths toward a Clearing: Radical Empiricism and Ethnographic Enquiry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. D. (2007). Excursions. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, J. L. (2002). ‘Performance Ethnography: The Role of Embodiment in Cultural Authenticity’. Theatre Topics, 12(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Junker, B. H. (1960). Field Work: An Introduction to the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Larocco, S. (2016). ‘Pain as Semiosomatic Force: The Disarticulation and Rearticulation of Subjectivity’. Subjectivity, 9(4), 343–62.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1986). Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nabhan-Warren, K. (2011). ‘Embodied Research and Writing: A Case for Phenomenologically Oriented Religious Studies Ethnographies’. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 79(2), 378–407.Google Scholar
Nordling, L. (2020). ‘Who Gets to Study Whom?’ SAPIENS: Anthropology Magazine, 17 July. Accessed 11 October 2023. www.sapiens.org/culture/anthropology-colonial-history/.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, R. (1989). Culture & Truth. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Scarry, E. (1985). The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scarry, E. (2000). ‘On Evil, Pain, and Beauty’. Interview by J. L. Geddes. Hedgehog Review, 2(2). Accessed 11 October 2023. https://hedgehogreview.com/issues/evil/articles/on-evil-pain-and-beauty-a-conversation-with-elaine-scarry.Google Scholar
Sharma, D. (2012). ‘Indigenous Performance Art Forms as Spaces for Social Reflection and Participatory Communication in Directed Social Change’. In Melkote, S. R., ed., Development Communication in Directed Social Change: A Reappraisal of Theory and Practice. Singapore: Asian Media Information and Communication Centre, pp. 169–96.Google Scholar
Shilling, C., & Mellor, P. A. (2010). ‘Saved from Pain or Saved through Pain? Modernity, Instrumentalization and the Religious Use of Pain as a Body Technique’. European Journal of Social Theory, 13(4), 521–37.Google Scholar
Spry, T. (2001). ‘Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis’. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 706–32.Google Scholar
Tyler, S. (1986). ‘Post-Modern Ethnography: From Document of the Occult to Occult Document’. In Clifford, J. & Marcus, G. E., eds., Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 122–40.Google Scholar

References

Alexander, J. C. (2011). The Performance of Politics: Obama’s Victory and the Democratic Struggle for Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baert, P. (2015). The Existentialist Moment: The Rise of Sartre as a Public Intellectual. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Baert, P., & Morgan, M. (2015). Conflict in the Academy: A Study in the Sociology of Intellectuals. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Balme, C., & Szymanski-Düll, B., eds. (2020). Methoden der Theaterwissenschaft. Tübingen, Germany: Narr Francke.Google Scholar
Banu, G. (2005). Les répétitions: de Stanislavski à aujourd’hui. Arles: Actes Sud.Google Scholar
Barber, K. (2000). The Generation of Plays: Yorùbá Popular Life in Theater. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, K. (2007). The Anthropology of Texts, Persons and Publics: Oral and Written Culture in Africa and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baumann, R., & Briggs, C. L. (1990). ‘Poetics and Performances as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life’. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59–88.Google Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1982). Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Beeman, W. O. (1993). ‘The Anthropology of Theatre and Spectacle’. Annual Review of Anthropology, 22, 369–93.Google Scholar
Bloch, N., & Heimböckel, D., eds. (2016). Theater und Ethnologie: Beiträge zu einer produktiven Beziehung. Tübingen, Germany: Narr Francke.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, T. (2012). Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Methods. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Born, G. (1995). Rationalizing Culture: IRCAM, Boulez, and the Institutionalization of the Musical Avant-Garde. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977 [1972]). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984 [1979]). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boyer, D. (2019). ‘Foucault in the Bush: The Social Life of Post-Structuralist Theory in East Berlin’s Prenzlauer Berg’. Ethnos, 66(2), 207–36.Google Scholar
Boyer, D., & Marcus, G. E., eds. (2021). Collaborative Anthropology Today: A Collection of Exceptions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Breidenstein, G., Hirschauer, S., Kalthoff, H., & Niewsand, B., eds. (2015). Ethnografie: Die Praxis der Feldforschung. 2nd ed. Konstanz, Germany: UTB.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carrithers, M. (2007 [1996]). ‘Fieldwork’. In Barnard, A. & Spencer, J., eds., Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology. London: Routledge, p. 262.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. (1986). ‘Introduction: Partial Truths’. In Clifford, J. & Marcus, G. E., eds., Writing Culture: The Politics and Poetics of Ethnography. Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E., eds. (1986). Writing Culture: The Politics and Poetics of Ethnography. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cole, C. M. (2001). Ghana’s Concert Party Theatre. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, S. G., Durington, M., & Gill, H. (2017). ‘Multimodality: An Invitation’. American Anthropologist, 119(1), 142–53.Google Scholar
Conquergood, D. (1989). ‘Poetics, Play, Process, and Power: The Performative Turn in Anthropology’. Text and Performance Quarterly, 1, 82–95.Google Scholar
Conquergood, D. (1991). ‘Rethinking Ethnography: Towards a Critical Cultural Politics’. Communication Monographs, 58(2), 179–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conquergood, D. (2002). ‘Performance Studies: Interventions and Radical Research’. TDR: The Drama Review, 46(2), 145–56.Google Scholar
Cowan, J. (1990). Dance and the Body Politic in Northern Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Das, V. (2007). Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Davis, T. C. (2020). ‘Setasidedness’. In Davis, T. C. & Marx, P. W., eds., The Routledge Companion to Theatre and Performance Historiography. London: Routledge, pp. 118–40.Google Scholar
Davis, T. C., & Marx, P. W. (2021). ‘Introduction: On Critical Media History’. In Davis, T. C. & Marx, P. W., eds., The Routledge Companion to Theatre and Performance Historiography. London: Routledge, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Davis, T. C., & Postlewait, T. (2003). ‘Theatricality: An Introduction’. In Davis, T. C. & Postlewait, T., eds., Theatricality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Devlieger, C. (2018). ‘Disability’. Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 14 June. http://doi.org/10.29164/18disab.Google Scholar
Donkor, D. (2007). ‘Performance, Ethnography and the Radical Intervention of Dwight Conquergood’. Cultural Studies, 21(6), 821−5.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1976). Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Faubion, J., & Marcus, G. E., eds. (2011). Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, E., Risi, C., & Roselt, J., eds. (2004). Kunst der Aufführung. Aufführung der Kunst. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1980). Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1983). ‘Blurred Genres: The Refiguration of Social Thought’. In Geertz, C., Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. London: Basic Books, pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (2000). Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gell, A. (1996). ‘Vogel’s Net: Traps as Artworks and Artworks as Traps’. Journal of Material Culture, 1(1), 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell, A. (2006 [1992]). ‘The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology’. In A. Gell, The Art of Anthropology: Essays and Diagrams, ed. Hirsch, E.. Oxford: Athlone Press, pp. 159–86.Google Scholar
Gennep, A. van. (2004 [1909]). The Rites of Passage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Harvie, J. & Lavender, A., eds. (2010). Making Contemporary Theatre: International Rehearsal Processes. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M. (1998). Portrait of a Greek Imagination: An Ethnographic Biography of Andreas Nenedakis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hinz, M. & Roselt, J. (2011). Chaos und Konzept. Proben und Probieren im Theater. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.Google Scholar
Howell, S. (2018). ‘Ethnography’. Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 18 February. http://doi.org/10.29164/18ethno.Google Scholar
Huizinga, J. (1950). Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2014). ‘That’s Enough about Ethnography!’ HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 383–95.Google Scholar
Irving, A. (2007). ‘Ethnography, Art, Death’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13(1), 185–208.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. (1996). ‘Introduction: Phenomenology, Radical Empiricism and Anthropological Critique’. In Jackson, M., ed., Things as They Are: New Directions in Phenomenological Anthropology. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1997). ‘Gesture’. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 109–28.Google Scholar
Kershaw, B. & Nicholson, H. (2011). Research Methods in Theatre and Performance. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Korom, F. J., ed. (2013). The Anthropology of Performance: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kreuder, F. (2016). ‘Schauspieler_innen als Ethnograph_innen’. In Cairo, M., Hannemann, M., Haß, U., & Schäfer, J., eds., Episteme des Theaters: Aktuelle Kontexte von Wissenschaft, Kunst und Öffentlichkeit. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript, pp. 539–50.Google Scholar
Kreuder, F., Bachmann, M., Pfahl, J., & Voz, D. (2012). ‘Vorwort’. In Kreuder, F., Bachmann, M., Pfahl, J., & Volz, D., eds., Theater und Subjektkonstitution: Theatrale Praktiken zwischen Affirmation und Subversion. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript, pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
Lambek, M., ed. (2010). Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language and Action. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2003). ‘A Dialog on Actor Network Theory with a (Somewhat) Socratic Professor’. In Avgerou, C., Ciborra, C., & Land, F., eds., The Social Study of Information and Communications Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 62–76.Google Scholar
Macdonald, S. (2001). ‘Ethnography in the Science Museum, London’. In Gellner, D. & Hirsch, E., eds., Inside Organisations: Anthropologists at Work. Oxford: Berg, pp. 77–96.Google Scholar
Madison, D. S. (2010). Acts of Activism: Human Rights as Radical Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1989 [1967]). A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (2005 [1922]). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Matzke, A. (2012a). Arbeit am Theater: Eine Diskursgeschichte der Probe. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.Google Scholar
Matzke, A. (2012b). ‘Hildesheimer Thesen V: Das Freie Theater gibt es nicht’. Nachtkritik.de, 21 November. Accessed 11 October 2023. https://nachtkritik.de/index.php?view=article&id=7472.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1936). ‘Les techniques du corps’. Journal de Psychologie, 32, 3–4.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1990 [1923]). The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McAuley, G. (1988). ‘Towards an Ethnography of Rehearsal’. New Theatre Quarterly, 14(53), 75–85.Google Scholar
McAuley, G. (2012). Not Magic but Work: An Ethnographic Account of a Rehearsal Process. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1997). Capitalism: An Ethnographic Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morris, R. C. (1995). ‘All Made Up: Performance Theory and the New Anthropology of Sex and Gender’. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 567–92.Google Scholar
Muñoz, J. E. (2006). ‘Feeling Brown, Feeling Down: Latina Affect, the Performativity of Race, and the Depressive Position’. New Feminist Theories of Visual Culture, 31(1), 675–88.Google Scholar
Nader, L. (1969). ‘Up the Anthropologist: Perspectives Gained from Studying Up’. In Hymes, D., ed., Reinventing Anthropology. New York: Pantheon Books (Random House), pp. 284–311.Google Scholar
Nader, L. (2011). ‘Ethnography as Theory’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 1(1), 211–19.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. (2016). ‘Dark Anthropology and Its Others: Theory since the Eighties’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 47−73.Google Scholar
Oswald, M. & Tinius, J., eds. (2022). Awkward Archives: Ethnographic Drafts for a Modular Curriculum. Berlin/Dakar/Milan: Archive Books.Google Scholar
Rabinow, P. (1977). Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rae, P. (2018). Real Theatre: Essays in Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, S. A. (1998). ‘The Politics and Poetics of Dance’. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27, 503–32.Google Scholar
Robbins, J. (2013). ‘Beyond the Suffering Subject: Toward an Anthropology of the Good’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 19(3), 447−62.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, R. (1986). ‘From the Door of His Tent: The Fieldworker and the Inquisitor’. In Clifford, J. & Marcus, G. E., eds., Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 77–97.Google Scholar
Sanjek, R. (1990). Fieldnotes: The Making of Anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sansi, R. (2015). Art, Anthropology and the Gift. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sansi, R. (2020). ‘Introduction: Anthropology and Curation through the Looking Glass’. In Sansi, R., ed., The Anthropologist as Curator. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Sansi, R., & Strathern, M. (2016). ‘Art and Anthropology after Relations’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(2), 425–39.Google Scholar
Sax, W. S. (2002). Dancing the Self: Personhood and Performance in the Pāṇḍav līlāof Garhwal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schechner, R. (1985). Between Anthropology and Theatre. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, P. (1985). Society and the Dance: The Social Anthropology of Process and Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C. (1988). ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ In Nelson, C. & Grossberg, L., eds., Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, pp. 271–316.Google Scholar
Sundén, J. (2003). Material Virtualities: Approaching Online Textual Embodiment. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Taussig, M. (2011). I Swear I Saw This: Drawings in Fieldwork Notebooks, Namely My Own. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. (1988). ‘The Rhetoric of Ethnographic Holism: “Postmodernism” and the Social Reproduction of Texts’. Cultural Anthropology, 3(3), 285–303.Google Scholar
Tinius, J. (2015a). ‘Between Professional Precariousness and Creative Self-Organisation: The Free Performing Arts Scene in Germany’. In Dockx, N. & Gielen, P., eds., Mobile Autonomy: Exercises in Artists’ Self-Organisation. Amsterdam: Valiz, pp. 171–93.Google Scholar
Tinius, J. (2015b). ‘Institutional Formation and Artistic Critique in German Ensemble Theatre’. Performance Research, 20(4), 71–7.Google Scholar
Tinius, J. (2016). ‘Rehearsing Detachment: Refugee Theatre and Dialectical Fiction’. Cadernos de Arte e Antropologia, 5(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
Tinius, J. (2017a). ‘Anthropologische Beobachtungen zu künstlerischer Subjektivierung und institutioneller Reflexivität: Das Theaterprojekt Ruhrorter mit Geflüchteten am Theater an der Ruhr’. In Wartstat, M., Evers, F., Flade, K., Lempa, F., & Seuberling, L., eds., Applied Theatre: Rahmen und Positionen. Berlin: Theater der Zeit, pp. 205–35.Google Scholar
Tinius, J. (2017b). ‘Art as Ethical Practice: Anthropological Observations on and beyond Theatre’. World Art, 7(2), 227–51.Google Scholar
Tinius, J. (2018). ‘Capacity for Character: Fiction, Ethics, and the Anthropology of Conduct’. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 26(3), 345–60.Google Scholar
Tinius, J. (2020). ‘Die Ethnografie als Methode der Theaterwissenschaften?’ In Balme, C. & Szymanski-Düll, B., eds., Methoden der Theaterwissenschaften. Tübingen, Germany: Narr Francke, pp. 315–36.Google Scholar
Tinius, J. (2021). ‘The Anthropologist as Sparring Partner: Instigative Public Fieldwork, Curatorial Collaboration, and German Colonial Heritage’. Berliner Blätter, 83, 65–85.Google Scholar
Tinius, J. (2023). State of the Arts: An Ethnography of German Theatre and Migration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tinius, J., & Wewerka, A., eds. (2020). Der fremde Blick. Roberto Ciulli und das Theater an der Ruhr. 2 vols. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.Google Scholar
Turner, V. (1970). The Forest of Symbols: Essays on Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, V. (1986). The Anthropology of Performance. New York: Performing Arts Journal.Google Scholar
Weber, C. (1967/8). ‘Brecht as Director’. TDR: The Drama Review, 1, 101–7.Google Scholar
Weiner, J. F. (1996). ‘Introduction: Aesthetics Is a Cross-Cultural Category’. In Ingold, T., ed., Key Debates in Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp. 251–4.Google Scholar
Wihstutz, B., & Hoesch, B., eds. (2020). Neue Methoden der Theaterwissenschaft. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Doing
  • Edited by Tracy C. Davis, Northwestern University, Illinois, Paul Rae, University of Melbourne
  • Book: The Cambridge Guide to Mixed Methods Research for Theatre and Performance Studies
  • Online publication: 01 February 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009294904.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Doing
  • Edited by Tracy C. Davis, Northwestern University, Illinois, Paul Rae, University of Melbourne
  • Book: The Cambridge Guide to Mixed Methods Research for Theatre and Performance Studies
  • Online publication: 01 February 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009294904.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Doing
  • Edited by Tracy C. Davis, Northwestern University, Illinois, Paul Rae, University of Melbourne
  • Book: The Cambridge Guide to Mixed Methods Research for Theatre and Performance Studies
  • Online publication: 01 February 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009294904.008
Available formats
×