Book contents
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors to Volume I
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Introduction to Volume I
- Part I Regional Developments
- 1 Britain, the Industrial Revolution, and Modern Economic Growth
- 2 Continental Europe
- 3 Tokugawa Japan and the Foundations of Modern Economic Growth in Asia
- 4 China: The Start of the Great Divergence
- 5 From the Mughals to the Raj: India 1700–1858
- 6 Sustainable Development in South East Asia
- 7 The Ottoman Empire, 1700–1870
- 8 The Economic History of North America, 1700–1870
- 9 Latin America: 1700–1870
- 10 Africa: Slavery and the World Economy, 1700–1870
- 11 Australia: Geography and Institutions
- Part II Factors Governing Differential Outcomes in the Global Economy
- Index
- References
5 - From the Mughals to the Raj: India 1700–1858
from Part I - Regional Developments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 June 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors to Volume I
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Introduction to Volume I
- Part I Regional Developments
- 1 Britain, the Industrial Revolution, and Modern Economic Growth
- 2 Continental Europe
- 3 Tokugawa Japan and the Foundations of Modern Economic Growth in Asia
- 4 China: The Start of the Great Divergence
- 5 From the Mughals to the Raj: India 1700–1858
- 6 Sustainable Development in South East Asia
- 7 The Ottoman Empire, 1700–1870
- 8 The Economic History of North America, 1700–1870
- 9 Latin America: 1700–1870
- 10 Africa: Slavery and the World Economy, 1700–1870
- 11 Australia: Geography and Institutions
- Part II Factors Governing Differential Outcomes in the Global Economy
- Index
- References
Summary
In 1700 the Mughals controlled much of the Indian subcontinent. By 1858 the British Crown ruled. Why did this transition occur? How did the relationship between the state and economic activity change? And how did the economy perform? This chapter provides an overview, discussing competing perspectives on the breakdown of the Mughal Empire, the rise of the East India Company, the increasing commercialization of the economy, and changes in the economic structure. The literature suggests that the East India Company’s political and military success partly came from more successful fiscal administration compared to its Indian rivals. After consolidating its rule, British policy favoured the export of Indian primary products and the import of manufactured goods, contributing to deindustrialization. In agriculture, the area cultivated increased with population, but technology stagnated. Per capita income, which was already low, may have fallen slightly. Conflicts between the state and local users of forests and other resources emerged, especially in conjunction with the introduction of a major technological innovation, the railways. Our period ends with the Mutiny, a formidable challenge to British rule, following which British policy became conservative, seeking to preserve the existing social order.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World , pp. 123 - 145Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Alam, M. (1986). The Crisis of Empire in Mughal North India: Awadh and Punjab, 1707–48, Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alam, M. (1991). ‘Eastern India in the Early Eighteenth Century “Crisis”: Some Evidence from Bihar’, in Marshall, P. J. (ed.) (2003). The Eighteenth Century: Evolution or Revolution?, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 43–71. First published in 1991 in Indian Economic and Social History Review, 27.Google Scholar
Alam, M. and Subrahmanyam, S. (eds.) 1998. The Mughal State: 1526–1750, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alavi, S. (ed.) (2002). The Eighteenth Century in India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ali, A. M. (1993). ‘The Mughal Polity: A Critique of Revisionist Approaches’, Modern Asian Studies 27(4), 699–710.Google Scholar
Allen, R. C. (2007). ‘India in the Great Divergence’, in Williamson, J. G., Hatton, T. J., O’Rourke, K. H. and Taylor, A. M. (eds.), The New Comparative Economic History: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey G. Williamson, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagchi, A. (1976). ‘Deindustrialization in Gangetic Bihar 1809–1901’, in Das Gupta, A., De, B., Ray, N. R., Sarkar, J. and Chakrabarty, P. (eds.), Essays in Honour of Prof. S. C. Sarkar. New Delhi: People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Bayly, C. (1992). Rulers, Townsmen and Bazaars: North India Society in the Age of British Expansion 1770–1870, Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhargava, M. (ed.) (2014). The Decline of the Mughal Empire, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. and Gupta, B. (2006). ‘The Early Modern Great Divergence: Wages, Prices and Economic Development in Europe and Asia, 1500–1800’, Economic History Review, 59(1), 2–31.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S., Custodis, J. and Gupta, B. (2015). ‘India and the Great Divergence: An Anglo-Indian Comparison of GDP Per Capita, 1600–1871’, Explorations in Economic History, 55, 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, B. B. (1984). ‘Eastern India’, in Kumar, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Economic History of India, vol. 2: c.1757–c.1970, Delhi: Orient Longman, 86–176.Google Scholar
Chaudhury, S. (1995). From Prosperity to Decline: Eighteenth Century Bengal. Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar
Clingingsmith, D. and Williamson, J. G. (2008). ‘Deindustrialization in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century India: Mughal Decline, Climate Shocks, and British Industrial Ascent’, Explorations in Economic History, 45(3), 209–34.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, A. (1970). ‘Trade and Politics in Eighteenth Century India’, in Alam, M. and Subrahmanyam, S. (eds.), (1998). The Mughal State: 1526–1750, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 361–397. First published in Richards, D. S. (ed.), (1970). Islam and the Trade of Asia, Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, S. (1998). The New Cambridge History of India: The Marathas, 1600–1818, New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guha, R. (1983). ‘Forestry in British and Post-British India: A Historical Analysis’, Economic and Political Weekly, 44(June), 1882–1896.Google Scholar
Guha, S. (2015). ‘Rethinking the Economy of Mughal India: Lateral Perspectives’, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 58, 532–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habib, I. (1997). ‘India during the Mughal Period’, in Sridhar, S. N. and Mattoo, N. K. (eds.), Ananya: A Portrait of India, New York: The Association of Indians in America, 87–102.Google Scholar
Hossain, H. (1988). The Company Weavers of Bengal: The East India Company and the Organization of Textile Production in Bengal, 1750–1813, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, D. (1984). ‘South India’, in Kumar, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Economic History of India, vol. 2: c.1757–c.1970, Delhi: Orient Longman, 352–375.Google Scholar
Leonard, K. (1979). ‘The “Great Firm” Theory of the Decline of the Mughal Empire’, in Alam, M. and Subrahmanyam, S. (eds.), (1998), The Mughal State: 1526–1750, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 398–418. First published in 1979 in Comparative Studies in Society and History, 21(2).Google Scholar
Marshall, P. J. (ed.) (2003). The Eighteenth Century: Evolution or Revolution? New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parthasarathi, P. (1998). ‘Rethinking Wages and Competitiveness in the Eighteenth Century: Britain and South India’, Past and Present, 158, 79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parthasarathi, P. (2011). Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600–1850, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pathak, A. (2002). Law, Strategies, Ideologies: Legislating Forests in Colonial India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, M. N. (1976). ‘Shivaji and the Decline of the Mughal Empire’, Journal of Asian Studies, 35(2), 221–335.Google Scholar
Prakash, O. (1976). ‘Bullion for Goods International Trade and the Economy of Early Eighteenth Century Bengal’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 13, 159–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, O. (2002). ‘Trade and Politics in Eighteenth Century Bengal’, in Alavi, S. (ed.), The Eighteenth Century in India, New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 136–164.Google Scholar
Raychaudhuri, T. (1982). ‘The State and the Economy: The Mughal Empire’, in Raychaudhuri, T. and Habib, I. (eds), The Cambridge Economic History of India, vol. I: c.1200–c.1750, Cambridge University Press, 172–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. F. (1981). ‘The Indian Empire and Peasant Production of Opium in the Nineteenth Century’, Modern Asian Studies, 15, 59–82.Google Scholar
Richards, J. F (2002). ‘The Opium Industry in British India’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 39, 149–179.Google Scholar
Roy, T. (2010). ‘Economic Conditions in Early Modern Bengal: A Contribution to the Divergence Debate’. Journal of Economic History, 70 (1), 179–194.Google Scholar
Roy, T. (2011). The Economic History of India 1857–1947, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, T. (2013a). ‘Rethinking the Origins of British India: State Formation and Military-Fiscal Undertakings in an Eighteenth Century World Region’, Modern Asian Studies, 47(4), 1125–1146.Google Scholar
Roy, T. and Swamy, A. (2016). Law and the Economy in Colonial India, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sivaramkrishnan, K. (1995). ‘Colonialism and Forestry in India: Imagining the Past in Present Politics’, Comparative Studies in History and Society, 37(1), 3–40.Google Scholar
Sivramkrishna, S. (2009). ‘Ascertaining Living Standards in Erstwhile Mysore, Southern India, from Francis Buchanan’s Journey of 1800–01: An Empirical Contribution to the Great Divergence Debate’, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 52(4–5), 695–733.Google Scholar
Stein, B. (1985). ‘State Formation and Economy Reconsidered: Part One’, Modern Asian Studies, 19(3), 387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studer, R. (2015). The Great Divergence Reconsidered: Europe, India, and the Rise to Global Economic Power, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subramanian, L. (2010). History of India, 1707–1857, New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan Private Limited.Google Scholar
Vicziany, M. (1979). ‘The Deindustrialization of India in the Nineteenth Century: A Methodological Critique of Amiya Kumar Bagchi’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 16(2), 105–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washbrook, D. (1981). ‘Law, State and Agrarian Society in Colonial India’, Modern Asian Studies, 15, 649–721.Google Scholar
Washbrook, D. (2004). ‘South India, 1770–1840: The Transition’, Modern Asian Studies, 38(3), 479–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazdani, K. (2017). India, Modernity, and the Great Divergence: Mysore and Gujarat (17th to 19th C.), Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar