Book contents
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors to Volume I
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Introduction to Volume I
- Part I Regional Developments
- 1 Britain, the Industrial Revolution, and Modern Economic Growth
- 2 Continental Europe
- 3 Tokugawa Japan and the Foundations of Modern Economic Growth in Asia
- 4 China: The Start of the Great Divergence
- 5 From the Mughals to the Raj: India 1700–1858
- 6 Sustainable Development in South East Asia
- 7 The Ottoman Empire, 1700–1870
- 8 The Economic History of North America, 1700–1870
- 9 Latin America: 1700–1870
- 10 Africa: Slavery and the World Economy, 1700–1870
- 11 Australia: Geography and Institutions
- Part II Factors Governing Differential Outcomes in the Global Economy
- Index
- References
8 - The Economic History of North America, 1700–1870
from Part I - Regional Developments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 June 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors to Volume I
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Introduction to Volume I
- Part I Regional Developments
- 1 Britain, the Industrial Revolution, and Modern Economic Growth
- 2 Continental Europe
- 3 Tokugawa Japan and the Foundations of Modern Economic Growth in Asia
- 4 China: The Start of the Great Divergence
- 5 From the Mughals to the Raj: India 1700–1858
- 6 Sustainable Development in South East Asia
- 7 The Ottoman Empire, 1700–1870
- 8 The Economic History of North America, 1700–1870
- 9 Latin America: 1700–1870
- 10 Africa: Slavery and the World Economy, 1700–1870
- 11 Australia: Geography and Institutions
- Part II Factors Governing Differential Outcomes in the Global Economy
- Index
- References
Summary
In 1700 about 250,000 European colonists and enslaved Africans lived in North America, primarily along a thin strip of land bordering the Atlantic Ocean. By 1870 these scattered colonial settlements had been consolidated into two continental nations – the United States and Canada – with a combined population of more than 40 million. Although agriculture remained the leading employer in North America in 1870, the rapid growth of industry was transforming these nations into increasingly urban and industrial societies and contributing to the accelerating growth of living standards. This chapter locates the sources of this remarkable growth in the interactions of abundant natural resources, a responsive economic and political system, and sustained technological progress. Yet the story of these years is not solely one of economic success. From the perspective of the aboriginal peoples of North America, European settlement and expansion had tragic consequences. So, too, the experience of enslaved Africans and their descendants was one of remarkable hardships. Slavery proved a source of continuing political tensions that resulted in a destructive and costly civil war and left a legacy of racial segregation and tensions that are still palpable today.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Economic History of the Modern World , pp. 193 - 218Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Abramovitz, M. and David, P. A. (2000). ‘American Macroeconomic Growth in the Era of Knowledge-Based Progress: The Long-Run Perspective’, in Engerman, S. L. and Gallman, R. E. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, vol. 3, Cambridge University Press, 1–92.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Allen, R. C., Murphy, T. E. and Schneider, E. B. (2012). ‘Colonial Origins of the Divergence in the Americas: A Labor Market Approach’, Journal of Economic History, 72(4), 863–894.Google Scholar
Atack, J. and Bateman, F. (1987). To Their Own Soil: Agriculture in the Antebellum North, Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Atack, J., Bateman, F., Haines, M. and Margo, R. A. (2010). ‘Did Railroads Induce or Follow Economic Growth? Urbanization and Population Growth in the American Midwest, 1850–1860’, Social Science History, 32(2), 171–197.Google Scholar
Beard, C. A. (1913). An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States, New York: Dover, reprinted 2004.Google Scholar
Cain, L. (2006). ‘Transportation’, in Carter, S. B., Gartner, S. S., Haines, M. R., Omstead, A. L., Sutch, R. and Wright, G. (eds.), Historical Statistics of the United States, Earliest Times to the Present: Millennial Edition, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, S. B., Gartner, S. S., Haines, M. R., Omstead, A. L., Sutch, R. and Wright, G. (eds.) (2006). Historical Statistics of the United States, Earliest Times to the Present: Millennial Edition, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engerman, S. L. and Sokoloff, K. L. (2012). ‘Factor Endowments and Institutions’, in Engerman, S. L., Sokoloff, K. L. and Haber, S. (eds.), Economic Development in the Americas since 1500: Endowments and Institution, National Bureau of Economic Research Series on Long Term Factors in Economic Development, Cambridge University Press, 31–56.Google Scholar
Field, A. J. (1978). ‘Sectoral Shift in Antebellum Massachusetts: A Reconsideration’, Explorations in Economic History 15, 146–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galenson, D. (1981). White Servitude in Colonial America, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galenson, D (1996). ‘The Settlement and Growth of the Colonies: Population, Labor, and Economic Development’, in Engerman, S. L. and Gallman, R. E. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, vol. 1: The Colonial Era, Cambridge University Press, 135–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geloso, V. (2019). ‘Distinct within North America: Living Standards in French Canada, 1688–1775’, Cliometrica, 13, 277–321.Google Scholar
Goldin, C. D. (1973). ‘The Economics of Emancipation’, Journal of Economic History, 33(1), 66–85.Google Scholar
Goldin, C. D. and Lewis, F. D. (1975). ‘The Economic Costs of the American Civil War: Estimates and Implications’, Journal of Economic History, 35(2), 299–326.Google Scholar
Haines, M. R. and Sutch, R. (2006). ‘Population: 1790–2000 [Annual estimates], Table Aa6–8’, in Carter, S. B., Gartner, S. S., Haines, M. R., Olmstead, A. L., Sutch, R. and Wright, G. (eds.), Historical Statistics of the United States, Earliest Times to the Present: Millennial Edition, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heckelman, J. C. and Dougherty, K. L. (2013). ‘A Spatial Analysis of Delegate Voting at the Constitutional Convention’, Journal of Economic History 73(2), 407–444.Google Scholar
Johnston, L. and Williamson, S. H. (2016). ‘What Was the U.S. GDP Then?’, MeasuringWorth, measuringworth.com/usgdp/#Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. (1980). Wealth of a Nation to Be: The American Colonies on the Eve of the Revolution, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lindert, P. H. and Williamson, J. G. (2016). Unequal Gains: American Growth and Inequality since 1700, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maddison Project Database, version 2013, Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J. L. (2014). ‘The Maddison Project: Collaborative Research on Historical National Accounts’, Economic History Review, 67(3): 627–651, working paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, G. L. and Main, J. T. (1988). ‘Economic Growth and the Standard of Living in Southern New England, 1640–1774’, Journal of Economic History, 48(3), 27–46.Google Scholar
Mancall, P. C. and Weiss, T. (1999). ‘Was Economic Growth Likely in Colonial British North America?’, Journal of Economic History, 59(1), 17–40.Google Scholar
Mancall, P. C., Rosenbloom, J. L. and Weiss, T. (2002). ‘Agricultural Labor Productivity in the Lower South, 1720 to 1800’, Explorations in Economic History, 39, 390–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancall, P. C., Rosenbloom, J. L. and Weiss, T (2004). ‘Conjectural Estimates of Economic Growth in the Lower South, 1720 to 1800’, in Guinnane, T. W., Sundstrom, W. and Whatley, W. (eds.), History Matters: Economic Growth, Technology, and Population, Essays in Honor of Paul A. David, Stanford University Press, 387–424.Google Scholar
McClelland, P. (1969). ‘The Cost to America of British Imperial Policy’, American Economic Review, 59, 370–381.Google Scholar
McCusker, J. J. (2006). ‘Population by Race and by Colony or Locality: 1620–1780: Table Eg1-59’, in Carter, S. B., Gartner, S. S., Haines, M. R., Olmstead, A. L., Sutch, R. and Wright, G. (eds.), Historical Statistics of the United States, Earliest Times to the Present: Millennial Edition, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mittal, S., Rakove, J. N. and Weingast, B. R. (2010). ‘The Constitutional Choices of 1787 and their Consequences’, in Irwin, D. and Sylla, R. (eds.), Founding Choices: American Economic Policy in the 1790s, University of Chicago Press, 25–56.Google Scholar
North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olmstead, A. L. and Rhode, P. W. (2002). ‘The Red Queen and the Hard Reds: Productivity Growth in American Wheat, 1800–1940’, Journal of Economic History, 62(4), 929–966.Google Scholar
Olmstead, A. L. and Rhode, P. W. (2008). ‘Biological Innovation and Productivity Growth in the Antebellum Cotton Economy’, Journal of Economic History, 68(4), 1123–1169.Google Scholar
Rhode, P. W. and Sutch, R. (2006). ‘Estimates of National Product Before 1929’ in Carter, S. B., Gartner, S. S., Haines, M. R., Olmstead, A. L., Sutch, R. and Wright, G. (eds.), Historical Statistics of the United States, Earliest Times to the Present: Millennial Edition, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (1963). ‘Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910’, Journal of Economic History, 23 (4), 414–443.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, J. L. (1993). ‘Anglo American Technological Differences in Small Arms Manufacturing’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 23, 683–698.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, J. L. (2004). ‘Path Dependence and the Origins of Cotton Textile Manufacturing in New England’, in Farnie, D. A. and Jeremy, D. J. (eds.), The Fibre that Changed the World: The Cotton Industry in International Perspective, 1600–1990s, Oxford University Press, 365–391.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, J. L. and Weiss, T. (2014). ‘Economic Growth in the Mid-Atlantic Region: Conjectural Estimates for 1720 to 1800’, Explorations in Economic History, 51, 41–59.Google Scholar
Rousseau, P. L. and Sylla, R. (2005). ‘Emerging Financial Markets and Early US Growth’, Explorations in Economic History, 42, 1–25.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. (2016). American Revolutions: A Continental History, 1750–1804, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Temin, P (1976). ‘The Post-Bellum Recovery of the South and the Cost of the Civil War’, Journal of Economic History, 36, 898–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubelaker, D. H. (1988). ‘North American Indian Population Size, A.D. 1500 to 1985’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 77, 289–294.Google Scholar
Walton, G. M. and Shepherd, J. F. (1979). The Economic Rise of Early America, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, G. (1986). Old South, New South: Revolutions in the Southern Economy since the Civil War, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wright, G (2006). Slavery and American Economic Development, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar