Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Part I The Economic Background
- Part II Natural Resources and Factor Endowments
- Part III Economic Organization and Sectoral Performance
- Part IV The Economic Impact of Independence
- 13 The Economic Consequences of Independence in Latin America
- Bibliographical Essays
- Index
- References
13 - The Economic Consequences of Independence in Latin America
from Part IV - The Economic Impact of Independence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Part I The Economic Background
- Part II Natural Resources and Factor Endowments
- Part III Economic Organization and Sectoral Performance
- Part IV The Economic Impact of Independence
- 13 The Economic Consequences of Independence in Latin America
- Bibliographical Essays
- Index
- References
Summary
In his classic work on Latin America, Victor Bulmer-Thomas concludes, “The economic development of Latin America since independence is a story of unfulfilled promise,” and stresses that “the gap between living standards in Latin America and those in the developed countries has steadily widened since the early nineteenth century.” This view has been qualified by Stephen Haber, who pointed out that the income gap between Latin America and Anglo-Saxon America “is not a product of the twentieth century.” John Coatsworth, in turn, added that today’s Latin American underdevelopment arose during the colonial era and in the aftermath of independence. Evidence on levels of per capita income supports the view that Latin America as a whole did not worsen its position relative to the United States during the twentieth century (Table 13.1).
Independence, achieved in most of Latin America between 1808 and 1825, and the resulting insertion into the international economy (a long process that gathered momentum between 1850 and 1873) appear as the two most important events in assessments of economic performance in nineteenth-century Latin America.
However, no consensus exists on how independence came about. Was it the result of an external shock, such as the Napoleonic Wars and the French invasion of the Iberian peninsula? Was it a consequence of institutional inefficiency or, conversely, a reaction against reforms and modernization associated with the introduction of new liberal ideas and institutions in the metropolis and, hence, an endogenous phenomenon? Was it, perhaps, the outcome of the struggle against liberal reform and modernization in central colonies (Mexico and Peru), whereas in peripheral colonies (New Granada and the Rio de la Plata), it resulted from militaristic opportunism, stimulated by smuggling interests, at the time of the Napoleonic invasion of the Iberian peninsula?
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Economic History of Latin America , pp. 461 - 504Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
,
, and
, “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation,”American Economic Review 91, 5 (2001):CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,
, and
, “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 4 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Republic of Capital. Buenos Aires and the Legal Transformation of the Atlantic World (Stanford, CA, 1999)Google Scholar
, South America and the World Economy from Independence to 1930 (London, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Farm to Factory: A Reinterpretation of the Soviet Industrial Revolution (London, 2002)Google Scholar
, “Del mercantilismo a la libertad: Las consecuencias económicas de la independencia argentina,” in
and
, eds., La independencia americana: Consecuencias económicas (Madrid, 1993).Google Scholar
, “Immiserizing Growth: A Geometric Note,” Review of Economic Studies 25, 3 (1957-1958).Google Scholar
, Cities and Economic Development. From the Dawn of History to the Present (Chicago, 1988)Google Scholar
and
, “The Breakup of Nations: A Political Economy Analysis,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (1997).Google Scholar
, Hispanic American Historical Review 81, 3–4 (2001).
, The Economic History of Latin America since Independence, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Failure of Export-Led Growth in Brazil and Mexico c. 1870–1930” (University of London Institute of Latin American Studies Research Papers No. 31, 1992)Google Scholar
, “Notes on the Comparative Economic History of Latin America and the United States,” in
and
, eds., Development and Underdevelopment in America: Contrasts in Economic Growth in North America and Latin America in Historical Perspective (New York, 1993).Google Scholar
and
, “Institutions and Long-Run Economic Performance in Mexico and Spain, 1800–2000” (Working Papers on Latin America, no. 02103.1, David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University, 2002).Google Scholar
, “Obstacles to Economic Growth in Nineteenth-Century Mexico,” American Historical Review 83, 1 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Decline of the Mexican Economy, 1800–1860,” in
, ed., América Latina en la epoca de Simon Bolívar. La formacion de las economías nacionalesy los intereses económicos europeos, 1800–1850 (Berlin, 1989).Google Scholar
and
, “Why Has Africa Grown Slowly?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 13, 3 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and
, “Explaining African Economic Performance,” Journal of Economic Literature 37, 1 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and
, “Argentina: From Colony to Nation. Fiscal and Monetary Experiences from the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries,” in
and
, eds., Transferring Wealth and Power from the Old to the New World. Monetary and Fiscal Institutions in the 17th through the 19th Centuries (Cambridge, 2001).Google Scholar
and
, on the other hand, argue that there was export-led growth in colonial Mexico in “Minería, crecimiento y costes de la independencia en México,” Revista de Historia Economica 19, 3 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,
, and
, “Inequality, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth among New World Economies,” in
, ed. Institutions, Contracts, and Organizations (Cheltenham, 2000).Google Scholar
, De imperio a nación. Crecimiento y atraso económico en España, 1780–1930 (Madrid, 1988), chap. 1.Google Scholar
, “International Comparisons of Real Product, 1820–1990: An Alternative Data Set,” Explorations in Economic History 37, 1 (2000).Google Scholar
, “Terms of Trade and Backwardness: Testing the Prebisch Doctrine for Spain and Britain during Industrialization” (Universidad Carlos III Working Papers Series 94/46, 1994).Google Scholar
, “International Trade and Factor Mobility with an Endogenous Land Frontier. Some General Equilibrium Implications of Christopher Colombus,” in
and
, eds., Theory, Policy and Dynamics in International Trade (Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar
,
, and
, “Geography and Economic Development,” International Regional Science Review, 22, 2 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed., How Latin America Fell Behind. Essays on the Economic Histories of Brazil and Mexico, 1800–1914 (Stanford, CA, 1997).Google Scholar
and
, “Industrial Prosperity under Political Instability: An Analysis of Revolutionary Mexico,” in
and
, eds., Governing for Prosperity (New Haven, CT, 2000),Google Scholar
,
,
, and
, “Economía chilena 1810–1995: Evolucion cuantitativa del producto total y sectorial” (Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Instituto de Economía, Documento de Trabajo no. 186, 1998).Google Scholar
, “La economía de la Nueva España, 1680–1809: Un análisis a partir de las cajas reales,” Historia Mexicana 34, 136 (1985):Google Scholar
, “Trade as a Handmaiden of Growth: Similarities between the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries,” Economic Journal 80 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and
, “Globalization and the Inequality of Nations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 4 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor (New York, 1998).Google Scholar
and
, “Was Economic Growth Likely in Colonial British North America?” Journal of Economic History 59, 1 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Beneficios y costes fiscales del colonialismo: las remesas americanas a España, 1760–1814,” Revista de Historia Económica 15, 3 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, La bancarrota del virreinato. Nueva España y las finanzas del imperio español, 1780–1810 (Mexico, 1999).Google Scholar
, ed., Las inversiones extranjeras en América Latina, 1850–1930. Nuevos debates y problemas en historia económica comparada (México, 1995)Google Scholar
and
, “Institutions and Geography: Comment on Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson (2000)” (NBER Working Paper Series, no. 8114, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and
, “Governance and Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 13, 3 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Exports and Terms of Trade in Argentina, 1811–1870,” Bulletin of Latin American Research 17, 3 (1998).Google Scholar
and
, “The Economic Consequences of Argentine Independence,” Cuadernos de Economía 115 (2001).Google Scholar
, “Economic Development and Population Change: Argentina, 1810–1870,” in
and
, eds., Latin America and the World Economy since 1800 (Cambridge, MA, 1998),Google Scholar
and
, “Purely Animal: Pastoral Production and Early Argentine Economic Growth 1825–1865,” Explorations in Economic History 35, 3 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “La educación elemental en Hispanoamérica: Desde la independencia hasta la centralización de los sistemas educativos nacionales,” Hispanic American Historical Review 71, 2 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Institutions and Economic Growth: An Historical Introduction,” World Development 17, 9 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,
, and
, “Order, Disorder, and Economic Change: Latin America versus North America,” in
and
, eds., Governing for Prosperity (New Haven, CT, 2000)Google Scholar
and
, Economic Growth in Britain and France, 1780–1914. Two Paths to the Twentieth Century (London, 1978).Google Scholar
, “Dependency in Nineteenth-Century Latin America: An Historian Objects,” Latin American Research Review 15 (1980).Google Scholar
, The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems (New York, 1950).Google Scholar
,
, and
, “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Integration and Geography in Economic Development” (IMF Working Paper 02/189, November 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and
, “Cuba and the Latin American Terms of Trade: Old Theories, New Evidence,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 31, 2 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Origins and Progress of U.S.–Mexican Trade, 1825–1884: ‘Hoc opus, hic labor est,’” Hispanic American Historical Review 71, 4 (November 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and
, “Cuba and the Latin American Terms of Trade,” 216. Paul Gootenberg, Between Silver and Guano. Commercial Policy and the State in Postindependence Peru (Princeton, NJ, 1989).Google Scholar
, “L’evolution seculaire des taux de fret et d’assurance maritimes 1819–1940,” Bulletin de l’Institute de Recherches Économiques et Sociales 17, 5 (1951).Google Scholar
, “The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Borrowing Countries,” American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings 11, 2 (1950).Google Scholar
and
, “Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14, 3 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and
, The Colonial Heritage of Latin America. Essays on Economic Dependence in Perspective (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
and
, “D. C. M. Platt: The Anatomyof ‘Autonomy,’” Latin American Research Review 15 (1980).Google Scholar
, “British Direct and Portfolio Investment in Latin America before 1914,” Journal of Economic History 37, 3 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Progress, Poverty and Exclusion. An Economic History of Latin America in the 20th Century (Washington, DC, 1998)Google Scholar
, “Real Wages, Inequality, and Globalization in Latin America before 1940,” Revista de Historia Económica 17 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by