Commercial policy between the wars

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521225045.003

CHAPTER II - Commercial policy between the wars

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Charles P. Kindleberger

Edited by

Peter Mathias and

Sidney Pollard

Show author details

Charles P. Kindleberger: Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Brandeis University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

War and post-war reconstruction

The First World War marked the end of an era in the history of commercial relations among countries. New boundaries set in the peace treaties, especially with Austria and Hungary, converted pre-1914 internal trade to international trade. Trade relations interrupted by war could not always be restored. Extended fighting and disruption of peacetime economic intercourse produced substantial changes in the economic capacities and interests of major trading nations. Monetary disturbance evoked responses in trade policy, especially increases in tariffs, to offset effects of exchange depreciation abroad. A loosely concerted attempt was made after the war to patch up the fabric of trade relationships, but with nothing like the fervour exhibited after the Second World War. There was virtually no planning of post-war trade policies, despite President Wilson's third of the fourteen points that called for ‘removal, as far as possible, of all economic barriers and the establishment of an equality of trade conditions among all nations consenting to the peace and associating themselves with its maintenance’.

Exigencies of war led to changes in commercial policy. The McKenna budget in Britain in 1915 imposed duties of 33⅓ per cent on motor cars and parts, musical instruments, clocks, watches, and cinematographic film in an effort to reduce imports of luxuries and to save shipping space – although the point has been made that the shipping space taken by watches is minimal (Kreider, 1943, p. 13). Unlike previous luxury taxes in Britain, these duties on imports were not matched by domestic excises to eliminate the protective effect.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Economic History of Europe from the Decline of the Roman Empire , pp. 161 - 196

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521225045.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andersen, F. Nyboe. Bilateral Exchange Clearing Policy. Copenhagen, 1946.Google Scholar

Arndt, H. W.The Economic Lessons of the Nineteen-Thirties. London, 1944.Google Scholar

,Australia: Committee on Economics (Brigden, J. B.) The Australian Tariff, An Economic Enquiry. Melbourne, Melbourne University Press, 1929.Google Scholar

Benham, Frederic C.Great Britain under Protection. New York, 1941.Google Scholar

Bergsten, C. Fred. Completing the GATT: Toward New International Rules to Govern Export Controls. No place stated, British–North-American Committee, 1974.Google Scholar

Beveridge, William H.Tariffs, The Case Examined by a Committee of Economists under the Chairmanship of Sir William Beveridge. New York, 1931.Google Scholar

Bidwell, Percy W.The Invisible Tariff. A Study of Control of Imports into the United States. New York, 1939.Google Scholar

Bidwell, Percy W.Raw Materials: A Study of American Policy. New York, 1958.Google Scholar

Brigden, J. L. ‘The Australian Tariff and the Standard of Living’, Economic Record, vol. I, no. 1 (November 1925).Google Scholar

Brown, William Adams Jr.The United States and the Restoration of World Trade. Washington, DC, 1950.Google Scholar

Childs, Frank C.The Theory and Practice of Exchange Control in Germany. The Hague, 1958.CrossRef Google Scholar

Condliffe, J. B.The Reconstruction of World Trade: A Survey of International Economic Relations. New York, 1940.Google Scholar

Copland, Douglas B. and James, C. V.Australian Tariff Policy: A Book of Documents, 1932–1937. Melbourne, 1937.Google Scholar

Davis, Joseph S.The World Between the Wars, 1919–1939: An Economist's View. Baltimore, Md., 1975.Google Scholar

Dohan, Michael and Hewett, Edward. Two Studies in Soviet Terms of Trade, 1918–1970. Bloomington, Ind., 1973.Google Scholar

Drummond, Ian M.British Economic Policy and the Empire, 1919–1939. London, 1972.Google Scholar

Drummond, Ian M.Imperial Economic Policy, 1917–1939: Studies in Expansion and Protection. Toronto, 1975.Google Scholar

Einzig, Paul J.Bloodless Invasion: German Penetration into the Danube States and the Balkans. London, 1938.Google Scholar

Elliott, William Y., May, Elizabeth S., Rowe, J. F. W., Skelton, Alex and Wallace, Donald H.International Control in Non-ferrous Metals. New York, 1937.Google Scholar

,Federal Trade Commission. The International Petroleum Cartel, US Senate Select Committee on Small Business, 82nd Congress, Committee Print no. 6. Washington, DC, August 1952.

Feis, Herbert. Three International Episodes seen from E.A.New York, 1946.Google Scholar

Feis, Herbert. 1933, Characters in Crisis. Boston, 1966.Google Scholar

Friedman, Philip. The Impact of Trade Destruction on National Income: A Study of Europe, 1924–38. Gainesville, Fla., 1974.Google Scholar

Furnivall, J. S.Netherlands India: A Study of Plural Economy. Cambridge, 1939.Google Scholar

Gordon, Margaret S.Barriers to World Trade: A Study of Recent Commercial Policy. New York, 1941.Google Scholar

Haight, Frank Arnold. A History of French Commercial Policies. New York, 1941.Google Scholar

Hancock, W. Keith. Survey of British Commonwealth Affairs, vol. II: Problems of Economic Policy. London, 1940.Google Scholar

Hexner, Erwin. International Cartels. Durham, NC, 1946.Google Scholar

Hoover, Herbert. The Memoirs of Herbert Hoover, vol. III, The Great Depression, 1929–1941. New York, 1952.Google Scholar

Hull, Cordell. The Memoirs of Cordell Hull. New York, 1948.Google Scholar

Johnson, Alvin S. ‘Protection and the Formation of Capital’, Political Science Quarterly, vol. XXIII (June 1908).Google Scholar

Johnson, D. Gale. Trade and Agriculture; A Study of Inconsistent Policies. New York, 1950.Google Scholar

Jones, Joseph M. Jr.Tariff Retaliation, Repercussions of the Hawley-Smoot Bill. Philadelphia, 1934.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles P.The Terms of Trade: A European Case Study. New York, 1956.Google Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles P.The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Berkeley, 1973; revised edn, 1986.Google Scholar

Knorr, Klaus E.World Rubber and its Regulation. Stanford, 1946.Google Scholar

Kreider, Carl. The Anglo-American Trade Agreement: A Study of British and American Commercial Policies, 1934–39. Princeton, 1943.Google Scholar

Lary, Hal B. (,US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce). The United States in the World Economy, Economic Series, no. 23. Washington, DC, 1943.Google Scholar

,League of Nations. Enquiry into Clearing Agreements. Geneva, 1935.

,League of Nations. Commercial Policy in the Interwar Period: International Proposals and National Policies. Geneva, 1942.

,League of Nations. Economic Committee. Considerations on the Present Evolution of Agricultural Tariffs. Geneva, 1935.

,League of Nations. (Hilgerdt, Folke). Europe's Trade, A Study of the Trade of European Countries with Each Other and with the Rest of the World. Geneva, 1941.Google Scholar

,League of Nations. (Hilgerdt, Folke). The Network of World Trade, A Companion Volume to ‘Europe's Trade’. Geneva, 1942.Google Scholar

,League of Nations. (Meade, James E.). World Economic Survey, 1937/38. Geneva, 1938.Google Scholar

,League of Nations. (Meade, James E.). World Economic Survey, 1936/39. Geneva, 1939.Google Scholar

,League of Nations. (Page, W. T.). Memorandum on European Bargaining Tariffs. Geneva, 1927.Google Scholar

,League of Nations. (Viner, Jacob). Trade Relations between Free-market and Controlled Economies. Geneva, 1943.Google Scholar

Lewis, Cleona. Nazi Europe and World Trade. Washington, DC, 1941.Google Scholar

Lewis, W. Arthur. Economic Survey, 1919–1939. Philadelphia, 1950.Google Scholar

Liepmann, H.Tariff Levels and the Economic Unity of Europe. London, 1938.Google Scholar

Malenbaum, Wilfrid. The World Wheat Economy, 1895–1939. Cambridge, Mass., 1953.CrossRef Google Scholar

Manoilesco, Mihail. The Theory of Protection and International Trade. London, 1931.Google Scholar

Mason, Edward S.Controlling World Trade, Cartels and Commodity Agreements. New York, 1946.Google Scholar

McDiarmid, Orville J.Commercial Policy in the Canadian Economy. Cambridge, Mass., 1946.CrossRef Google Scholar

,Office of the Chief Counsel for Prosecution of Nazi Criminality. Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, vols. I and VII. Washington, DC, 1946.

Petzina, Dieter. Autarkiepolitik im dritten Reich, Der national-sozialistiche Vierjahresplan. Stuttgart, 1968.CrossRef Google Scholar

Reitsama, A. J. ‘Trade and Redistribution of Income: Is There Still an Australian Case?’, Economic Record, vol. XXIV, no. 68 (August 1958).Google Scholar

Richardson, J. H.British Economic Foreign Policy. London, 1936.Google Scholar

Roepke, Wilhelm. German Commercial Policy. London, 1934.Google Scholar

Roepke, Wilhelm. International Economic Disintegration. London, 1942.Google Scholar

Rowe, J. W. F.Markets and Men: A Study of Artificial Control Schemes. New York, 1936.Google Scholar

Salter, Arthur Sir. Recovery, the Second Effort. London and New York, 1932.Google Scholar

Schacht, Hjalmar. ‘Germany's Colonial Demand’, Foreign Affairs, vol. XIV (January 1937).Google Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E.Politics, Pressures and Tariffs: A Study of Free Private Enterprise in Pressure Politics as Shown by the 1929–30 Revision of the Tariff. New York, 1935.Google Scholar

Schuker, Stephen A.The End of French Predominance in Europe: The Financial Crisis of 1924 and the Adoption of the Dawes Plan. Chapel Hill, NC, 1976.Google Scholar

Smith, Mark A. ‘The United States Flexible Tariff’, in Explorations in Economics, Notes and Essays Contributed in Honor of F. W. Taussig. New York, 1936.Google Scholar

Stolper, W. F. and Samuelson, P. A. ‘Protection and Real Wages’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. IX (November 1941).Google Scholar

Suetens, M.Histoire de lapolitique commercial de la Belgique jusqu' à nos jours. Brussels, 1955.Google Scholar

Tasca, Henry J.The Reciprocal Trade Agreement Policy of the United States: A Study in Trade Philosophy. Philadelphia, 1938.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thorbecke, Erik. The Tendency toward Regionalization in International Trade, 1928–1956. The Hague, 1960.Google Scholar

,United Nations, Department of Economic Affairs. Customs Union: A League of Nations Contribution to the Study of Custom Union Problems. Lake Success, NY, 1947.

,United States Department of State. Tariff Commission. Foreign Trade and Exchange Controls, Report no. 150. Washington, DC, 1942.

Van Gelderen, J.The Recent Development of Economic Foreign Policy in the Netherlands East Indies. London, 1939.Google Scholar

Viner, Jacob. The Customs Union Issue. New York, 1950.Google Scholar

Viner, Jacob. Dumping: A Problem in International Trade. 1923, rep. New York, 1966.Google Scholar

Winslow, E. M. ‘Administrative Protection: A Problem in Commercial Policy’, in Explorations in Economics: Notes and Essays in Honor ofF. W. Taussig. New York, 1936.Google Scholar