Book contents
- The Cambridge Economic History of China
- The Cambridge Economic History of China
- The Cambridge Economic History of China
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors to Volume I
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Citations
- Introduction to Volume I
- Part I Before 1000
- Interlude
- Part II 1000 to 1800
- Bibliography of Primary Works Cited
- Index
- References
Interlude
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 February 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Economic History of China
- The Cambridge Economic History of China
- The Cambridge Economic History of China
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors to Volume I
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Citations
- Introduction to Volume I
- Part I Before 1000
- Interlude
- Part II 1000 to 1800
- Bibliography of Primary Works Cited
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Economic History of China , pp. 241 - 256Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Further Reading
Clark, Hugh, “Why Does the Tang–Song Interregnum Matter?”, Journal of Song–Yuan Studies 46 (2016), 1–28; 47 (2017–2018), 1–31; 49 (2020), 1–44.Google Scholar
Elvin, Mark, The Pattern of the Chinese Past (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Fogel, Joshua A., Politics and Sinology: The Case of Naitō Konan (1866–1934) (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Council on East Asian Studies, 1984).Google Scholar
Hartwell, Robert M., “Demographic, Political, and Social Transformations of China, 750–1550,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 42.2 (1982), 365–442.Google Scholar
Nap-yin, Lau 柳立言, “Hewei Tang Song biange?” 何謂唐宋變革, Zhonghua wenshi luncong 中華文史論叢 81 (2006), 125–71.Google Scholar
Huarui, Li 李华瑞, “‘Tang Song biange’ lunde youlai yu fazhan” 『唐宋变革』论的由来与发展, Hebei xuekan 河北学刊 2010.4, 57–65; 2010.5, 67–77.Google Scholar
Luo, Yinan, “A Study of the Changes in the Tang–Song Transition Model,” Journal of Song–Yuan Studies 35 (2005), 99–127.Google Scholar
Miyakawa, Hisayuki, “The Naitō Hypothesis and Its Effects on Japanese Studies of China,” Far Eastern Quarterly 14.3 (1955), 533–52.Google Scholar
Yasuhiko, Satake 佐竹靖彦, “Zōsetsu” 総説, in Yasuhiko, Satake et al. (eds.), Sō Gen jidaishi no kihon mondai 宋元時代史の基本問題 (Tokyo, Kyūko shoin, 1996), pp. 3–42.Google Scholar
Tackett, Nicolas, “A Tang–Song Turning Point,” in Szonyi, Michael (ed.), A Companion to Chinese History (Hoboken, Wiley Blackwell, 2017), pp. 118–28.Google Scholar
von Glahn, Richard, “Imagining Pre-modern China,” in Smith, Paul J. and von Glahn, Richard (eds.), The Song–Yuan–Ming Transition in Chinese History (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Council on East Asian Studies, 2003), pp. 35–70.Google Scholar