Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-86b6f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T21:50:48.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Idea

from ENTRIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2016

By
Alan Nelson
Edited by
Lawrence Nolan
Alan Nelson
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lawrence Nolan
Affiliation:
California State University, Long Beach
Get access

Summary

Ideas are modes of thought that function in various important ways in Descartes’ philosophy. It is in virtue of ideas that thought is intentional and gives meaning to words. Ideas are the subject matter for true and false judgments that are expressed in propositional forms, and they are the basis of the certain foundations of knowledge (scientia). This variety of functions is correlated with a complex set of theoretical distinctions that apply to ideas. Most of these are first explained rather than just used in the Third Meditation of the Meditations on First Philosophy:

First, however, considerations of order appear to dictate that I now classify my thoughts into definite kinds, and ask which of them can properly be said to be the bearers of truth and falsity. Some of my thoughts are as it were the images of things [tanquam rerum imagines], and it is only in these cases that the term “idea” is strictly appropriate – for example when I think of a man, or a chimera, or the sky, or an angel, or God.

(AT VII 36–37, CSM II 25–26)

This passage continues by noting that some thoughts have “additional forms,” which include volitional aspects. So all modes of thought include an ideational aspect in the “strictly appropriate” sense, while some include volitional aspects as well (AT VIIIA 17, CSM I 204; cf. AT III 295, CSMK 172). That contrast is important in the Fourth Meditation's theodicy of error (see error, theodicies of). The quoted Third Meditation passage goes on to introduce the question of truth and falsity:

Now as far as ideas are concerned, provided they are considered solely in themselves and I do not refer them to anything else, they cannot strictly speaking be false; for whether it is a goat or a chimera that I am imagining, it is just as true that I imagine the former as the latter.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon , pp. 387 - 395
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alanen, Lilli. 2003. Descartes's Concept of Mind.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael. 1998. “Ideas and Objective Being,” in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Garber, D. and Ayers, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1062–107.Google Scholar
Beck, L. J. 1952. The Method of Descartes.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beyssade, Jean-Marie. 1992. “Descartes on Material Falsity,” in Minds, Ideas, and Objects, ed. Cummings, P. and Zoeller, G.. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing, 5–20.Google Scholar
Brown, Deborah. 2008. “Descartes on True and False Ideas,” in A Companion to Descartes, ed. Broughton, J. and Carriero, J.. Oxford: Blackwell, 196–215.Google Scholar
Carriero, John. 2009. Between Two Worlds. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Vere. 1986. “The Theory of Ideas,” in Essays on Descartes’ Meditations, ed. Rorty, A.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 177–221.Google Scholar
Cunning, David. 2003. “True and Immutable Natures and Epistemic Progress in Descartes's Meditations,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11: 235–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, Martial. 1953. Descartes selon l'ordre des raisons, 2 vols. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Jolley, Nicholas. 1990. The Light of the Soul.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 1968. Descartes. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Landy, David. 2011. “Descartes’ Compositional Theory of Mental Representation,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92: 214–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennon, Thomas. 1974. “The Inherence Pattern and Descartes’ Ideas,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12: 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. 1999. Cartesian Questions.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McRae, Robert. 1972. “Innate Ideas,” in Cartesian Studies, ed. Butler, R. J.. New York: Barnes and Noble, 32–54.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. 2006. “The Doctrine of Ideas,” in The Blackwell Guide to Descartes’ Meditations, ed. Gaukroger, S.. Oxford: Blackwell, 86–103.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alan. 2013. “The Structure of Cartesian Sensations,” Analytic Philosophy 54: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Alan. 2008. “Cartesian Innateness,” in A Companion to Descartes, ed. Broughton, J. and Carriero, J.. Oxford: Blackwell, 319–33.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alan. 1997. “Descartes’ Ontology of Thought,” Topoi 16: 163–78.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alan. 1996. “The Falsity in Sensory Ideas: Descartes and Arnauld,” in Interpreting Arnauld, ed. Kremer, E.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 13–32.Google Scholar
Newman, Lex. Forthcoming. “Theories of Ideas,” in The Routledge Companion to Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Kaufman, D.. New York: Routledge.
Nolan, Lawrence. 1997. “The Ontological Status of Cartesian Natures,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78: 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normore, Calvin. 1986. “Meaning and Objective Being: Descartes and His Sources,” in Essays on Descartes’ Meditations, ed. Rorty, A.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 223–42.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Amy. 2014. “The Third Meditation on Objective Being: Representation and Intentional Content,” in The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations, ed. Cunning, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149–67.Google Scholar
Simmons, Alison. 2014. “Sensory Perception of Bodies: Meditation 6.5,” in The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations, ed. Cunning, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 258–76.Google Scholar
Simmons, Alison. 1999. “Are Cartesian Sensations Representational?,” Noûs 33: 347–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Kurt. 2005. “Rationalism and Representation,” in A Companion to Rationalism, ed. Nelson, A.. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 206–23.Google Scholar
Sowaal, Alice. 2011. “Descartes's Reply to Gassendi,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19: 419–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Margaret. 1999. Ideas and Mechanism.Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Margaret. 1978. Descartes. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Idea
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.139
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Idea
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.139
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Idea
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.139
Available formats
×