Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T04:52:06.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distinction (Real, Modal, and Rational)

from ENTRIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2016

Dominik Perler
Affiliation:
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Philosophie
Lawrence Nolan
Affiliation:
California State University, Long Beach
Get access

Summary

Descartes famously claims that mind and body are really distinct substances, a view known as substance dualism (AT VII 78, 169–70; CSM II 54, 119–20). This claim is part of a larger theory of distinctions, which has both a metaphysical and an epistemological side. On the one hand, it explains what kinds of entities there are in the world and how they are related to each other; on the other, it also spells out how we can gain knowledge of these relations and how we are thereby able to provide an adequate description of the world – a description that fits not only human beings but also purely material substances (e.g., plants and animals) and purely mental substances (God and angels) as well as their attributes and modes.

The theory of distinctions has Scholastic roots. It was originally developed to resolve various theological puzzles (e.g., the connection between the three divine persons and the relation between God's essence and his attributes) but soon became a general instrument for distinguishing different types of metaphysical relations (Adams 1987, 16–29). Descartes came to know it through late Scholastic authors, among them Francisco Suárez and Eustachius a Sancto Paulo (Ariew 2011), and used it primarily in a nontheological context (for an application to some theological problems, see Armogathe 1977). On his view, which he sets forth in detail in Principles I.60–62, there are three types of distinction.

First, there is a real distinction. It obtains between two or more substances, and we can recognize it “from the fact that we can clearly and distinctly understand one apart from the other” (AT VIIIA 28, CSM I 213). This is precisely the distinction that exists between mind and body, but also between two (or more) minds and, should there be more than one, between two (or more) bodies (see individuation and substance).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Suárez, Francisco. 1597. Disputationes metaphysicae. Salamanca (reprint, Hildesheim: Olms 1965).Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord. 1991. “Aristotle and the Sacrament of the Altar: A Crisis in Medieval Aristotelianism,” in Aristotle and His Medieval Interpreters, ed. Bosley, R. and Tweedale, M.. Canadian Journal of Philosophy (suppl.) 17: 195–249.Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord. 1987. William Ockham. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger. 2011. Descartes among the Scholastics. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armogathe, Jean-Robert. 1977. Theologia cartesiana: L'explication physique de l'Eucharistie chez Descartes et Dom Desgabets. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, John. 2009. Between Two Worlds: A Reading of Descartes's Meditations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Paul. 2002. “Descartes's Theory of Distinction,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64: 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Stephen. 1997. “Suárez, Nominalism, and Modes,” in Hispanic Philosophy in the Age of Discovery, ed. White, K.. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 226–56.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Dugald. 1993. “Exclusion and Abstraction in Descartes’ Metaphysics,” Philosophical Quarterly 43: 38–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, Lawrence. 1998. “Descartes’ Theory of Universals,” Philosophical Studies 89: 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, Lawrence. 1997. “Reductionism and Nominalism in Descartes's Theory of Attributes,” Topoi16: 129–40.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin. 2010. “Accidents and Modes,” in The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, ed. Pasnau, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 674–85.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin. 2008. “Descartes and the Metaphysics of Extension,” in A Companion to Descartes, ed. Broughton, J. and Carriero, J.. Oxford: Blackwell, 271–87.Google Scholar
Rozemond, Marleen. 1998. Descartes's Dualism. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Secada, Jorge. 2000. Cartesian Metaphysics: The Scholastic Origins of Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wippel, John F. 1984. “Essence and Existence,” in The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, ed. Pasnau, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 622–34.Google Scholar
Wolter, Alan B. 1990. “The Formal Distinction,” in The Philosophical Theology of John Duns Scotus, ed. Adams, M. M.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 27–41.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×