Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T07:49:10.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Like a finger pointing to the moon: exploring the Trinity in/and the New Testament

from Part II - Retrieving the sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2011

By
Elaine M. Wainwright
Edited by
Peter C. Phan
Elaine M. Wainwright
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Peter C. Phan
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

Exploring “Trinity in/and the New Testament” is a challenging task. Francis Watson points to some of those challenges when he summarizes certain trends in recent New Testament scholarship in relation to Trinity:

Modern biblical scholarship has no great love for the doctrine of the Trinity. It likes to warn its customers that, if they read a biblical text in the light of what was to become the orthodox Nicene theology of the fourth century, they will inevitably be committing the sin of anachronism. The doctrine of the Trinity should be left to church historians and systematic theologians: it has no place in “our” field.

Addressing the question of Trinity in the New Testament could, therefore, be seen among some biblical scholars as a retrospective act, one which entails a looking back anachronistically at first-century texts through the lens of a fourth-century doctrine. Such an approach can lead to survey articles which gather texts across the New Testament containing or hinting at “trinitarian formulae” or the naming of G*d as Father, Son, and Spirit. Recent scholarship has, however, challenged biblical scholars to undertake a more nuanced approach to the task. In this chapter, I propose to explore and lay out some of the contemporary hermeneutical and interpretive issues involved in the naming of G*d as Trinity and/in the New Testament, leading to an articulation of a multi-layered approach. The limitations of this chapter will, however, allow me the space to explore only the first layer of the approach, and I will do this through the gospel of Matthew. It is my hope that this limited beginning will encourage readers to explore further the rich and complex imaging of G*d in the New Testament, only some of which drew later theologians into naming G*d as triune.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to the Trinity , pp. 33 - 48
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Trible, Phyllis, God and the Rhetoric of Sexuality, Overtures to Biblical Theology (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1978), 16Google Scholar
Kapleau, Philip, Three Pillars of Zen (Boston: Beacon, 1965), 167, 174Google Scholar
Watson, Francis, “Trinity and Community: A Reading of John 17,” International Journal of Systematic Theology, 1:2 (1999), 168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorenza, Elisabeth Schüssler, Jesus – Miriam's Child, Sophia's Prophet: Critical Issues in Feminist Christology (New York: Continuum, 1994), 191 n. 3)Google Scholar
Wainwright, Arthur, The Trinity in the New Testament (London: SPCK, 1962), 237–67Google Scholar
Fortman, Edmund J., The Triune God: A Historical Study of the Doctrine of the Trinity (London: Hutchinson, 1972), 3–33Google Scholar
McFague, Sallie, “Mother God,” in Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza, ed., The Power of Naming: A Concilium Reader in Feminist Liberation Theology (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1996), 324Google Scholar
Johnson, Elizabeth A., She Who Is: The Mystery of God in Feminist Theological Discourse (New York: Crossroad, 1992), 42–57Google Scholar
Soskice, Janet Martin, Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985), 15Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke, “Metaphors He Lives By,” Semeia, 61 (1993), 205Google Scholar
Volf, Miroslav, Exclusion and Embrace: A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1996), 172Google Scholar
Hall, W. David, “The Economy of the Gift: Paul Ricoeur's Poetic Redescription of Reality,” Literature and Theology, 20:2 (2006), 195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, Alan G., “The Canonical Sense of Scripture: Trinitarian or Christocentric?,” Dialog, 45:1 (2006), 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Vernon K., Exploring the Texture of Texts: A Guide to Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1996)Google Scholar
Heron, Alasdair, “The Biblical Basis for the Doctrine of the Trinity,” in Alasdair I. C. Heron, ed., The Forgotten Trinity, iii: A Selection of Papers Presented to the BCC Study Commission on Trinitarian Doctrine Today (London: BCC/CCBI, 1991), 38Google Scholar
Hammerton-Kelly, Robert, God the Father: Theology and Patriarchy in the Teaching of Jesus, Overtures to Biblical Theology (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979), 71Google Scholar
D'Angelo, Mary Rose, “Abba and ‘Father’: Imperial Theology and the Jesus Traditions,” Journal of Biblical Literature, 111:4 (1992), 622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Warren, Matthew and the Margins: A Sociopolitical and Religious Reading (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2000), 139Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Jack Dean, “The Composition and Christology of Matt 28:16–20,” Journal of Biblical Literature, 93 (1974), 573–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duling, Dennis, “Matthew's Plurisignificant ‘Son of David’ in Social Science Perspective: Kinship, Kingship, Magic, and Miracle,” Biblical Theology Bulletin, 22 (1992), 99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Leander E., “The Spirit and the Dove,” New Testament Studies, 17 (1970–71), 41–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy-O'Connor, Jerome, “What Really Happened at the Transfiguration: A Literary Critic Deepens our Understanding,” Bible Review, 3:3 (1987), 8–21Google Scholar
Schaberg, Jane, The Father, The Son and the Holy Spirit: The Triadic Phrase in Matthew 28:19b, Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series, 61 (Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1982)Google Scholar
D'Angelo, Mary Rose, “Abba and ‘Father’: Imperial Theology and the Jesus Traditions,” Journal of Biblical Literature, 111:4 (1992), 611–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Angelo, Mary Rose, “Intimating Deity in the Gospel of John: Theology Language and ‘Father’ in ‘Prayers of Jesus,’” in Adele Reinhartz, ed., God the Father in the Gospel of John, Semeia, 85 (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 1999), 83–104.Google Scholar
Johnson, Elizabeth A., She Who Is: The Mystery of God in Feminist Theological Discourse (New York: Crossroad, 1992).Google Scholar
Padgett, Alan G., “The Canonical Sense of Scripture: Trinitarian or Christocentric?,” Dialog, 45:1 (2006), 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhartz, Adele, ed., God the Father in the Gospel of John, Semeia, 85 (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 1999).Google Scholar
Schaberg, Jane, The Father, The Son and the Holy Spirit: The Triadic Phrase in Matthew 28:19b, Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series, 61 (Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Schüssler Fiorenza, Elisabeth, Jesus – Miriam's Child, Sophia's Prophet: Critical Issues in Feminist Christology (New York: Continuum, 1994).Google Scholar
Sheffield, Julian, “The Father in the Gospel of Matthew,” in Amy-Jill Levine, ed., A Feminist Companion to Matthew, Feminist Companion to the New Testament and Early Christian Writings, 1 (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001), 52–69.Google Scholar
Wainwright, Arthur, The Trinity in the New Testament (London: SPCK, 1962).Google Scholar
Watson, Francis, “Trinity and Community: A Reading of John 17,” International Journal of Systematic Theology, 1:2 (1999), 168–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Frances, “The Trinity and the New Testament,” in Christopher Rowland and Christopher Tuckett, eds., The Nature of New Testament Theology: Essays in Honour of Robert Morgan (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006), 286–305.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×