Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:18:57.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Art

from Part II - Structure and materiality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Mette Birkedal Bruun
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

The Cistercian Order has sometimes been unfairly disparaged as hostile to art, or as embracing an aesthetic so profoundly plain that the interiors of their monasteries would have seemed oases of visual repose, free from distracting artistic ornament. The legislation promulgated by many of the earliest generations of Cistercians, and the shells of surviving Cistercian abbeys, might reinforce this impression. Nonetheless, despite legislative prohibitions against colourful, figurative decorations in glass, manuscripts or sculpture which were enacted by the middle of the twelfth century, Cistercian monks lived and worshipped in a visually lush environment. Their churches, typically emptied of original furniture, windows and pavements after the Reformation or the French Revolution, would once have been carpeted with patterned tiles and the windows filled with decorative glass. Their liturgical readings were furnished by colourful illuminated manuscripts, the texts of which were highlighted with giant painted initials, and their charters were guaranteed with delicately wrought figurative seals. Monasteries sometimes received manuscripts enhanced with complex painted figural scenes from wealthy non-Cistercian patrons, or noble postulants to the Order. Furthermore, by two centuries after the Order’s foundation, enthusiasm for strict aesthetic asceticism had waned in many houses, where monks and nuns installed elaborate representational stained-glass panels, embroidered lavish figurative vestments and commissioned luxurious liturgical manuscripts for personal use. Thus while the Cistercians’ artistic legislation may have set the Order apart from the mainstream, by and large the art which characterised it did not.

As with Cistercian architecture, Cistercian art is typified by a certain degree of uniformity engendered by the Order’s well-developed bureaucracy, the lively exchange of monks, manuscripts and correspondence between houses and the artistic legislation intended to delimit some artistic production. Yet from the earliest days of the Order, the pioneer monks of Cîteaux embraced the artistic models provided by their local environment and the aesthetic heritage of the individual monks attracted to its houses from all over Europe. They also, by choice or necessity, bought and were given artworks made by artists who were not Cistercians. Both phenomena led to such artistic diversity that it is difficult to identify a ‘Cistercian’ type or style of art.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

William of Saint Thierry, St. Bernard of Clairvaux: The Story of His Life as Recorded in the Vita Prima Bernardi, trans. G. Webb and A. Walker (London, 1960)
Norton, C., ‘Table of Cistercian Legislation on Art and Architecture’, in Cistercian Art and Architecture in the British Isles, ed. Norton, C. and Park, D. (Cambridge, 1986)Google Scholar
Brisac, C., ‘Grisailles from the Former Abbey Churches of Obazine and Bonlieu’, in Studies in Cistercian Art and Architecture, 1, ed. M.P. Lillich, CS 66 (Kalamazoo, MI, 1982)Google Scholar
Kinder, T. N., ‘Medieval Tiles and Bricks at Pontigny’, in Studies in Cistercian Art and Architecture, 4, ed. M.P. Lillich, CS 134 (Kalamazoo, MI, 1993)Google Scholar
Peyrafort-Huin, M., La bibliothèque médiévale de l’abbaye de Pontigny (XIIe–XIXe siècles) (Paris, 2001)
Hayward, J., ‘Glazed Cloisters and Their Development in the Houses of the Cistercian Order’, Gesta, 12 (1973), 93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moessner, V.J., ‘The Medieval Embroideries of Convent Wienhausen’, in Studies in Cistercian Art and Architecture, 3, ed. M.P. Lillich, CS 89 (Kalamazoo, MI, 1987)Google Scholar
Hamburger, J.F., ‘Art, Enclosure and the Cura Monialium: Prolegomena in the Guise of a Postscript’, Gesta, 31 (1992), 108–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France, J., Medieval Images of Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, CS 210 (Kalamazoo, MI, 2007)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Art
  • Edited by Mette Birkedal Bruun, University of Copenhagen
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to the Cistercian Order
  • Online publication: 05 December 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9780511735899.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Art
  • Edited by Mette Birkedal Bruun, University of Copenhagen
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to the Cistercian Order
  • Online publication: 05 December 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9780511735899.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Art
  • Edited by Mette Birkedal Bruun, University of Copenhagen
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to the Cistercian Order
  • Online publication: 05 December 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9780511735899.013
Available formats
×